Megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome: don't forget the bladder.

PURPOSE: Megacystis-microcolon-intestinal hypoperistalsis syndrome (MMIHS) is a well described clinical condition, but reports are focused on microcolon and intestinal hypoperistalsis, while data on bladder management are scant. Aim of the study is to present urological concerns in MMIHS. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation of clinical data on urological management of MMIHS patients treated in the last 10 years. RESULTS: Six patients were enrolled (3 male, 3 female). Three girls had prenatal diagnosis of megacystis (1 vesicoamniotic shunt was placed). All patients had genetic diagnosis: 5 had ACTG2 gene mutations and 1 MYH11 mutation. All patients were addressed to our attention for urinary symptoms, such as urinary retention, urinary tract infections, acute renal injury. Two patients presented frequent stoma prolapses. All children underwent a complete urological evaluation, and then started a bladder management protocol (clean intermittent catheterization, via urethra or cystostomy-tube placement), with improvement of urinary infections, upper urinary tract dilation and stoma prolapses, if present. All patients had good renal function at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: We believe that MMIHS patients must be addressed soon and before onset of symptoms for a multidisciplinary evaluation, including an early assessment by a pediatric urologist expert in functional disorder, to preserve renal function at its best.

Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in Pediatric Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Diagnostic and Management Concerns.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is increasing in the pediatric population and, as in adults, symptoms vary among patients. In children the first manifestations can sometimes overlap with acute neurological symptoms. Urological symptoms have not been much studied in childhood. We shared our experience with MS urological manifestation in children. METHODS: This article is a retrospective evaluation of all children with MS, according to the Krupp criteria, who also present with urological symptoms. We collected demographic and clinical history, the MR localization of demyelinating lesions, urological symptoms, and exams. RESULTS: We report on six MS pediatric cases with urological manifestation. Urinary symptoms, characterized by urinary incontinence in five patients and urinary retention in one patient, appeared in a different time frame from MS diagnosis. Urodynamic exams showed both overactive and underactive bladder patterns. Treatment was defined according to lower urinary tract dysfunction, using clean intermittent catheterization, oxybutynin, and intradetrusor Onabotulinum Toxin-A injection. A low acceptance rate of invasive evaluation and urological management was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The MS diagnosis was traumatic for all our patients. We believe it is important to address urological care in young people from the time of diagnosis for prompt management; it could be useful to include a pediatric urologist in multidisciplinary teams.

Anorectal malformation, urethral duplication, occult spinal dysraphism (ARM-UD-OSD): a challenging uncommon association.

PURPOSE: Urethral duplication (UD) is a rare malformation, which can be associated with other anomalies, like anorectal malformations (ARM). ARM has been described with occult spinal dysraphism (OSD). No ARM-UD-OSD combination has been reported. AIM: To share our experience and to discuss the management of ARM-UD-OSD association. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of five boys with UD. Four of these had ARM-UD-OSD association. ARM was the first diagnosis in all; OSD and UD was detected during screening for associated malformation. RESULTS: All patients underwent ARM correction, 3 after colostomy. All reached fecal continence, 3 are performing bowel management. Three patients underwent UD surgical correction. Because of symptoms' worsening, 2 children had detethering surgery. At a mean follow-up of 9.5 years, all patients have normal renal function, 3 are on clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) for neurogenic bladder (1 has a cystostomy, another one an appendicostomy). CONCLUSIONS: UD and OSD should be considered in patients with ARM. Children with these conditions associated must be centralized in a third-level Center and management carefully planned; in particular, urethral reconstruction should be weighed, considering CIC could be required. Suspicion of neurogenic bladder must be present in OSD patient.

Button Cystostomy: Is it Really a Safe and Effective Therapeutic Option in Pediatric Patients With Neurogenic Bladder?

OBJECTIVE: To define safety and effectiveness of cystostomy button in the management of bladder drainage in pediatric patients with neurogenic bladder, and report our personalized surgical technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing cystostomy button placement for bladder drainage from October 2009 to December 2015. Endoscopic and open surgical techniques and medium-term complication were analyzed and indications were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients, 16 (45.7%) females and 19 (54.3%) males, underwent cystostomy button placement for bladder drainage with a mean age of 8.6 ± 4.8 years (standard deviation) and a mean follow-up time of 37 months. There were 91.4% of patients who had a neurogenic bladder; a nonobstructive urinary retention was diagnosed in the remainder of cases. A medium-term complication was mostly represented by urinary tract infection observed in 10 of 35 patients that was the most representative cause of button removal (4 of 35). Other observed complications were button leakage (n = 2), decubitus (n = 1), and bladder stone (n = 1). No postoperative complication was observed and no differences were found in terms of complications in the two surgical approaches performed. CONCLUSION: Cystostomy button is a safe and effective treatment for bladder drainage in neurogenic pediatric patients and it is also well accepted by patients and caregivers. Cystostomy button, which may avoid mechanical concerns and most of the social discomfort, should be considered an alternative method to other bladder drainage modalities.

Prenatal Features of Bladder Agenesis in a Female Fetus with Genital Transposition.

Bladder agenesis is a rare condition, mostly affecting females, where diagnosis is usually made in infancy when investigating urinary incontinence. Neonatal cases are uncommon, and none have been reported antenatally. The few male patients with this condition rarely survive: among associated anomalies, different degrees of penoscrotal transposition are the most evident feature. The association of genital transposition in a female infant with prenatal description of bladder agenesis has not been previously reported. Early diagnosis is important, enabling planning of surgical reconstruction early in life and appropriate parental counseling.

Spinal ultrasound in patients with anorectal malformations: is this the end of an era?

PURPOSE: Even if lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard in the diagnosis of occult spinal dysraphism (SD) in patients with anorectal malformations (ARMs), spinal ultrasound (US) performed up to 5 months of life have been largely used as a screening test. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy in terms of sensibility and specificity of neonatal US to detect occult SD in patients with ARMs. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all patients treated for ARMs between 1999 and 2013 at our institution who underwent both spinal US (up to 5 months of life) and MRI. Sensibility and specificity have been calculated for US based on MRI results. RESULTS: Of 244 patients treated for ARMs at our institution, 82 (34 females, 48 males) underwent both the imaging studies and have been included in this study. ARMs types were: anal stenosis (7), recto-vestibular fistula (19), recto-perineal fistula (3) and cloaca (5) in female and imperforate anus (7) recto-perineal fistula (14), recto-urethral fistula (22), recto-vesical fistula (5) in males. Forty-seven patients (57, 3 % of total, 18 females, 29 males) had some occult SD (tethered spinal cord, spinal lipoma, syringomyelia) at MRI. Only 7 (14, 8 %) patients of those with spinal anomalies at MRI had pathological US studies. In our population, sensibility and specificity of US for diagnosis of occult SD were, respectively, 14, 8 and 100 %. CONCLUSION: Since it is well known that a screening test must have a high sensibility, our data suggest that spinal ultrasound is not suitable as a screening test for occult spinal dysraphism in patients with ARMs. Furthermore, we strongly advise against the use of US as a screening test for spinal dysraphism to prevent a false sense of security in physician and patients' families.

A simplified technique for botulinum toxin injections in children with neurogenic bladder.

PURPOSE: Botulinum toxin type A has revolutionized the treatment of neurogenic bladder dysfunction. The original injection technique used a rigid cystoscope and a flexible collagen needle. To date botulinum toxin type A injection techniques have not been standardized. We present our experience in pediatric patients using a new flexible injection system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 24 patients 3.8 to 17.5 years old who had neurogenic bladder dysfunction with botulinum toxin type A bladder and/or sphincter injection using a rigid cystoscope and the new N-DO™ endo-injector needle system. Another 24 patients 3.6 to 17.8 years old were treated with a 3.7Fr standard flexible needle and served as controls. Operative time, hospital stay, complications and efficacy were considered. Selection criteria and treatment were the same in the 2 groups. The 10 IU/kg dose was determined according to European Association of Urology guidelines. RESULTS: All patients received botulinum toxin type A bladder injection while 11 patients in the endo-injector group and 5 controls also received urethral injection. In the endo-injector needle and control groups average operative time was 12.4 and 17.3 minutes for the bladder, and 5.1 and 10.1 minutes for the urethra, respectively (each p <0.05). All patients were discharged home the day after the procedure. No complications were observed. Urodynamics revealed an average maximum detrusor pressure decrease of 25 and 21 cm H(2)O, and an average bladder capacity increase of 75 and 80 ml in the endo-injector and control groups, respectively (p not significant). CONCLUSIONS: While retaining efficacy, the endo-injector needle technique appears to be more rapid than the standard procedure for botulinum toxin type A injection for neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Whether patients may be treated with sedation only remains to be clarified.