T cell involvement in cutaneous drug eruptions.

BACKGROUND: The most frequent side-effects of drug therapy are skin eruptions. Their pathomechanism is rather unclear. OBJECTIVE: In this prospective study we investigated the T cell activation and drug specificity in different forms of drug-induced exanthemas from 22 patients. METHODS: During acute drug allergy, liver parameters and T cell subset activation in the circulation (up-regulation of CD25 and HLA-DR) were evaluated and skin biopsies of the acute lesion performed. After recovery, the causative drug was identified by lymphocyte transformation (LTT) and scratch-patch tests. RESULTS: Seventeen of 22 (17/22) patients had maculo-papular exanthema, 4/22 bullous exanthema and 1/22 urticaria. The causative drugs were mainly antibiotics, anti-epileptics and anti-hypertensives. Up-regulation of HLA-DR on circulating CD4(+) and/or CD8(+) T cells was detected in 17 patients, being most marked in patients with bullous reactions or hepatic involvement. The LTT was positive in 14/21 analysed and the patch test in 7/15. All patients showed lymphocytic infiltration in the skin biopsy of the acute lesion. Generally CD4(+) T cells dominated; a higher percentage of circulating CD8(+) T cells was found in patients with bullous skin reactions or hepatic involvement. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate activation and drug specificity of T cells in drug-induced skin eruptions. A predominant CD8(+) T cell activation leads to more severe (bullous) skin symptoms or liver involvement, while predominant activation of CD4(+) cells elicits mainly maculo-papular reactions.

T-cell reaction to local anaesthetics: relationship to angioedema and urticaria after subcutaneous application--patch testing and LTT in patients with adverse reaction to local anaesthetics.

BACKGROUND: Local anaesthetics are known to elicit T-cell reactions after epicutaneous application, namely contact dermatitis. In addition, adverse reactions like urticaria and angioedema are rather common after submucosal or subcutaneous injection. The pathogenesis of these side-effects, which appear frequently hours after application, is unknown, but thought to be not immunoglobulin E-mediated, since immediate skin tests are mostly negative. OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether patients who developed urticaria and angioedema after subcutaneous application have a T-cell sensitization to local anaesthetics, which might be responsible for the symptoms. METHODS: Twenty patients with generalized and/or local cutaneous reactions after LA were examined with intradermal testing using a standard panel of six LAs and patch testing using between seven and nine LAs in vaseline and four LAs in PBS. In 10 patients, a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was performed. RESULTS: Only 2/20 patients had an immediate skin reaction (positive intradermal test), whereas 6/20 patients had a positive delayed skin reaction (positive patch test). In 6/10 subjects the LTT was positive. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed appearance of urticaria and angioedema after subcutaneous application of local anaesthetics may be related to a T cell- mediated sensitization, which might be detected by patch testing or LTT.

Recognition of local anesthetics by alphabeta+ T cells.

Patients with drug allergy show a specific immune response to drugs. Chemically nonreactive drugs like, for example, local anesthetics are directly recognized by alphabeta+ T cells in an HLA-DR restricted way, as neither drug metabolism nor protein processing is required for T cell stimulation. In this study we identified some of the structural requirements that determine cross-reactivity of T cells to local anesthetics, with the aim to improve the molecular basis for the selection of alternatives in individuals sensitized to a certain local anesthetic and to better understand presentation and T cell recognition of these drugs. Fifty-five clones (52 lidocaine specific, three mepivacaine specific from two allergic donors) were analyzed. Stimulatory compounds induced a down-regulation of the T cell receptor, demonstrating that these non-peptide antigens are recognized by the T cell receptor itself. A consistent cross-reactivity between lidocaine and mepivacaine was found, as all except one lidocaine specific clone proliferated to both drugs tested. Sixteen chemically related local anesthetics (including ester local anesthetics, OH- and desalkylated metabolites) were used to identify structural requirements for T cell recognition. Each of the four clones examined in detail was uniquely sensitive to changes in the structures of the local anesthetic: clone SFT24, i.e., did not recognize any of the tested OH- or desalkylated metabolites, while the clone OFB2 proliferated to all OH-metabolites and other differently modified molecules. The broadly reactive clone OFB2 allowed us to propose a model, suggesting that the structure of the amine side chain of local anesthetics is essential for recognition by the T cell receptor.

Interaction of sulfonamide derivatives with the TCR of sulfamethoxazole-specific human alpha beta+ T cell clones.

Drugs like sulfamethoxazole (SMX) or lidocaine can be presented to specific human alphabeta+ T cell clones (TCC) by undergoing a noncovalent association with MHC-peptide complexes on HLA-matched APCs. For a better understanding of the molecular basis of the recognition of such drugs by specific TCC, we investigated 1) the fine specificity of the recognizing TCR, 2) the dose-response relationship for the induction of proliferation or cytokine production, and 3) the mechanism of TCR triggering. For that purpose, we tested the reactivity of 11 SMX-specific CD4+ TCC and 2 SMX-specific CD8+ TCC to a panel of 13 different sulfonamide derivatives bearing the same core structure. Five of 13 clones recognized only SMX, while all other clones were responding to as many as 6 different compounds. Some of the compounds needed up to two orders of magnitude higher concentrations than SMX to stimulate TCC, thereby displaying features of weak agonists. Different clones showed clear differences in the minimal drug concentration required for the induction of a proliferative response. Therefore, weaker or stronger agonistic properties were not a characteristic of a given sulfonamide derivative but rather an intrinsic property of the reacting TCR. Finally, the number of down-regulated TCRs was a logarithmic function of the ligand concentration, implicating that specific T cells were activated by serial TCR engagement. Our data demonstrate that, despite the special way of presentation, nonpeptide Ag like drugs appear to interact with the TCR of specific T cells in a similar way as peptide Ags.

HLA-restricted, processing- and metabolism-independent pathway of drug recognition by human alpha beta T lymphocytes.

T cell recognition of drugs is explained by the hapten-carrier model, implying covalent binding of chemically reactive drugs to carrier proteins. However, most drugs are nonreactive and their recognition by T cells is unclear. We generated T cell clones from allergic individuals specific to sulfamethoxazole, lidocaine (nonreactive drugs), and cef-triaxone (per se reactive beta-lactam antibiotic) and compared the increase of intracellular free calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) and the kinetics of T cell receptor (TCR) downregulation of these clones by drug-specific stimulations. All drugs tested induced an MHC-restricted, dose- and antigen-presenting cell (APC)-dependent TCR downregulation on specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell clones. Chemically nonreactive drugs elicited an immediate and sustained [Ca2+]i increase and a rapid TCR downregulation, but only when these drugs were added in solution to APC and clone. In contrast, the chemically reactive hapten ceftriaxone added in solution needed > 6 h to induce TCR downregulation. When APC were preincubated with ceftriaxone, a rapid downregulation of the TCR and cytokine secretion was observed, suggesting a stable presentation of a covalently modified peptide. Our data demonstrate two distinct pathways of drug presentation to activated specific T cells. The per se reactive ceftriaxone is presented after covalent binding to carrier peptides. Nonreactive drugs can be recognized by specific alphabeta+ T cells via a nonconventional presentation pathway based on a labile binding of the drug to MHC-peptide complexes.

Allele-unrestricted presentation of lidocaine by HLA-DR molecules to specific alphabeta+ T cell clones.

T cells recognize peptide and non-peptide antigens. Drugs represent typical examples of non-peptide antigens. The majority of drug-specific T cells are alphabeta+ TCR T cells and are MHC class I or II restricted. Here we show the existence of drug (lidocaine)-specific T cell clones which proliferate in the presence of antigen-presenting cells (APC) with different HLA alleles. Two clones (SFT24 and E20) were analyzed in detail. They show a narrow dose-dependent proliferation to lidocaine, but not to procaine. With the use of a panel of HLA-typed allogeneic APC, we observed that certain allogeneic APC plus lidocaine lead to a similar, others to partial and some to no proliferation of the lidocaine-specific T cell clones. An APC-independent proliferation could be excluded since both clones proliferated only marginally without APC and increasing the number of APC resulted in a higher proliferation. Blocking experiments with anti-DP, -DQ and -DR antibodies showed that lidocaine is presented in a HLA-DR-restricted way both with autologous or allogeneic APC. Mouse fibroblasts transfected with an allogeneic HLA-DRB1*01 but not HLA-DR-negative mouse fibroblasts could serve as presenting cells. Fixation of APC did not hamper drug presentation, but pulsing of APC with the drug was not possible, indicating that processing is not required and that lidocaine binds in an unstable way to the MHC-peptide complex. This degenerate drug recognition has certain features of superantigen recognition, such as the ability of drugs to bind from the outside to multiple HLA-DR alleles. Such features of drug recognition may open new therapeutic possibilities to intervene with TCR-MHC interactions in a selective way.

[Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome. A review and presentation of 2 personal cases]. / Medikamenteninduzierte Hypersensitivitätssyndrome. Eine Ubersicht und Vorstellung von 2 eigenen Fällen.

Hypersensitivity syndromes are severe drug induced side effects with skin rashes, fever and/or multiorgan-system abnormalities which are not pharmacologically related. They are well known in relation to allopurinol, anticonvulsants and sulfonamides, but only rarely described with other drugs. These reactions are considered to be immune-mediated but the precise mechanisms are not completely understood. Clinical features, which resemble an EBV infection, and some immunological studies suggest that T-cell mediated immunity is involved in the pathogenesis of this rare disease. In the literature, allopurinol and anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndromes are clinically well characterized entities, while the definition of hypersensitivity syndrome elicited by other drugs is rather confusing. We present two patients, one with sulfamethoxazole- and one with allopurinol-induced hypersensitivity syndrome. In both cases a lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was performed and we analyzed the T-cell activation parameters CD25 and HLA-DR on CD4- and CD8- T-cells to demonstrate in vivo activation of T-cells during the active disease. Both patients show increased activation of T-cells with elevated levels of HLA-DR on CD8+ cells. The T-cell activation correlated with the clinical course. Our data support an immunological pathogenesis for hypersensitivity syndromes and the concept that drug specific T-cells are involved in hypersensitivity syndromes.

Characterization of lidocaine-specific T cells.

To investigate the cellular immune response to the drug lidocaine, we generated T cell lines and clones from the peripheral blood of four patients with proven allergy to lidocaine. The patients had contact dermatitis after topical application of lidocaine, and local swelling or generalized erythema exudativum multiforme after submucosal/subcutaneous injection of lidocaine. Two of three lidocaine-specific T cell lines were oligoclonal and one even became monoclonal, while the simultaneously analyzed immune response to tetanus toxoid was polyclonal. The lidocaine-specific T cell lines cross-reacted to mepivacaine, but not to other local anesthetics (bupivacaine, procaine, oxybuprocaine, and tetracaine). The majority of reactive T cells belonged to the CD4 cell lineage and were MHC class II restricted, but cloning also revealed some MHC class I-restricted CD8+ clones. A total of 2 of 56 lidocaine-specific T cell clones were CD4-CD8- and expressed TCR-gammadelta. The majority of 13 analyzed CD4 clones produced a rather polarized cytokine pattern, with a dominance of Th2-like cytokines showing a high IL-5 production. In addition, three CD4+ and all CD8+ (n = 7) clones secreted high IFN-gamma and low levels of IL-5/IL-4 (Th1-like). The data illustrate that a drug that sensitizes via the skin elicits a heterogeneous T cell response. The high IL-5 production and the participation of specific CD4+CD8+ and even gammadelta+ T cells appear to be distinguishing features of this hapten-specific immune response.

Functional expression of the eotaxin receptor CCR3 in T lymphocytes co-localizing with eosinophils.

BACKGROUND: The chemokine eotaxin is produced at sites of allergic inflammation, binds selectively to the chemokine receptor CCR3 and attracts eosinophil and basophil leukocytes, which express high numbers of this receptor. Responses of T lymphocytes to eotaxin have not been reported so far. We have investigated the expression of CCR3 in T lymphocytes and analysed the properties and in vivo distribution of T lymphocytes expressing this receptor. RESULTS: In search of chemokine receptors with selective expression in T lymphocytes, we have isolated multiple complementary DNAs (cDNAs) encoding CCR3 from a human CD4+ T-cell cDNA library. T-lymphocyte clones with selectivities for protein and non-protein antigens were analysed for expression of CCR3 and production of Th1- and Th2-type cytokines. Of 13 clones with surface CCR3, nine secreted enhanced levels of interleukin-4 and/or interleukin-5, indicating that CCR3 predominates in Th2-type lymphocytes. CCR3+ T lymphocytes readily migrated in response to eotaxin, and showed the characteristic changes in cytosolic free calcium. Immunostaining of contact dermatitis, nasal polyp and ulcerative colitis tissue showed that CCR3+ T lymphocytes are recruited together with eosinophils and, as assessed by flow cytometry, a large proportion of CD3+ cells extracted from the inflamed skin tissue were CCR3+. By contrast, CCR3+ T lymphocytes were absent from tissues that lack eosinophils, as demonstrated for normal skin and rheumatoid arthritis synovium. CONCLUSIONS: We show that T lymphocytes co-localizing with eosinophils at sites of allergic inflammation express CCR3, suggesting that eotaxin/CCR3 represents a novel mechanism of T-lymphocyte recruitment. These cells are essential in allergic inflammation, as mice lacking mature T lymphocytes were insensitive to allergen challenge. Surface CCR3 may mark a subset of T lymphocytes that induce eosinophil mobilization and activation through local production of Th2-type cytokines.

T cell reactions in patients showing adverse immune reactions to drugs.

OBJECTIVE AND DESIGN: To better understand how T cells react to small compounds, we investigated the in vitro T cell reactivity to drugs from drug allergic patients. MATERIAL AND SUBJECTS: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of three drug allergic individuals were stimulated in vitro by different drugs. METHODS: Proliferation was assayed by 3H-thymidine incorporation. Upregulation of activation parameter on T cells was done by immunofluorescence and cytokine release determined via standard ELISA. RESULTS: Drugs can stimulate both CD4 and CD8 T-cell subsets. PenG-stimulated PBMC showed a heterogenous cytokine pattern and clones secreted high amounts of INF gamma. In contrast, sulfamethoxazole and lidocaine-stimulated PBMC secreted high levels of IL-5 and lidocaine-specific clones can be Th1 or Th2-like. CONCLUSION: Drug specific T cells play a pivotal role in drug hypersensitivity reactions, both by regulating the immune response and probably also as specific effector cells with different patterns of cytokine release.