Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing one- and two-level minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) is one of the most common lumbar spine conditions treated surgically, often through a minimally invasive surgery (MIS) microdiscectomy approach. This technique attempts to reduce damage to the paraspinal muscular-ligamentous envelope. However, there are currently limited data regarding comparative outcomes using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for one- and two-level MIS discectomies. The aim of this study was to quantify comparative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing one-level and two-level MIS lumbar microdiscectomy for HNP using PROMs. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing MIS lumbar microdiscectomy between 2004 and 2019 for the primary diagnosis of HNP at a single academic institution. All patients had a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patient demographics and comorbidities were collected to establish baselines between cohorts. PROMs and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) were used to examine the patient's perception of operative success. Bivariate and multivariate linear/logistic regression analyses were used to compare one- and two-level discectomies. The bivariate analysis included the t-test and chi-square test, which were used to assess continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 293 patients underwent one-level (n = 250) or two-level (n = 43) MIS discectomies. The mean follow-ups for the one- and two-level cohorts were 50.4 (SD 35.5) months and 61.6 (SD 39.8) months, respectively. Fewer female patients underwent two-level discectomies, and BMI and operative duration were higher in the two-level group (p < 0.001). Recurrent herniation requiring reoperation was recorded at rates of 6.80% and 11.6% in the one- and two-level groups, respectively (p = 0.270). Pre- and postoperative PROMs were largely similar between the cohorts; however, patients undergoing one-level discectomy had greater improvement in leg pain, and a significantly greater proportion of these patients achieved MCID for the leg pain visual analog scale score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: At the 1-year clinical follow-up, patients who underwent two-level discectomy had significantly less improvement in leg pain scores with lower achievement of MCID for leg pain improvement than patients undergoing one-level procedures. At the 1-year follow-up, there were no other significant differences in PROMs between the two cohorts. Given these findings, patients should be counseled regarding the anticipated outcomes to better manage expectations. Further studies are warranted to examine the long-term clinical outcomes associated with single- and multilevel MIS discectomy.

YouTube as a source of information on pediatric scoliosis: a reliability and educational quality analysis.

PURPOSE: To assess the reliability and educational quality of YouTube videos related to pediatric scoliosis. METHODS: In December 2020, searches of "pediatric scoliosis", "idiopathic scoliosis", "scoliosis in children", and "curved spine in children" were conducted using YouTube. The first 50 results of each search were analyzed according to upload source and content. The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Benchmark Criteria were used to assess reliability (score 0-4), and educational quality was evaluated using the Global Quality Score (GQS; score 0-5) and Pediatric Scoliosis-Specific Score (PSS; score 0-15). Differences in scores based on upload source and content were determined by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariate linear regressions identified any independent predictors of reliability and educational quality. RESULTS: After eliminating duplicates, 153 videos were analyzed. Videos were viewed 28.5 million times in total, averaging 186,160.3 ± 1,012,485.0 views per video. Physicians (54.2%) and medical sources (19.0%) were the most common upload sources, and content was primarily categorized as disease-specific (50.0%) and patient experience (25.5%). Videos uploaded by patients achieved significantly lower JAMA scores (p = 0.004). Conversely, academic or physician-uploaded videos scored higher on PSS (p = 0.003) and demonstrated a trend towards improved GQS (p = 0.051). Multivariate analysis determined longer video duration predicted higher scores on all measures. However, there were no independent associations between upload source or content and assessment scores. CONCLUSION: YouTube contains a large repository of videos concerning pediatric scoliosis; however, the reliability and educational quality of these videos were low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Assessing the Quality and Credibility of Publicly Available Videos on Cervical Fusion: Is YouTube a Reliable Educational Tool?

BACKGROUND: YouTube has become a popular source for patient education, though there are concerns regarding the quality and reliability of videos related to orthopaedic and neurosurgical procedures. This study aims to evaluate the credibility and educational content of videos on YouTube related to cervical fusion. Secondarily, the study aims to identify factors predictive of higher or lower quality videos. METHODS: A YouTube query using the search terms "cervical fusion" was performed, and the first 50 videos were included for analysis. Reliability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria. Educational quality was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and the Cervical Fusion Content Score (CFCS). Videos were stratified by content and source, and differences in JAMA, GQS, and CFCS scores were assessed. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify predictors of higher or lower JAMA, GQS, and CFCS scores. Statistical significance was established at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Total number of views was 6 221 816 with a mean of 124 436.32 ± 412 883.32 views per video. Physicians, academic, and medical sources had significantly higher mean JAMA scores (P = 0.042). Exercise training and nonsurgical management videos had significantly higher mean CFCS scores (P = 0.018). Videos by physicians (ß = 0.616; P = 0.025) were independently associated with higher JAMA scores. Advertisements were significant predictors of worse CFCS (ß = -3.978; P = 0.030), and videos by commercial sources predicted significantly lower JAMA scores (ß = -1.326; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: While videos related to cervical fusion amassed a large viewership, they were poor in both quality and reliability. Videos by physicians were associated with higher reliability scores relative to other sources, whereas commercial sources and advertisements had significantly lower reliability and educational content scores. Currently, YouTube seems to be an unreliable source of information on cervical fusion for patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of this study aid surgeons in counseling patients interested in cervical fusion, and suggest that publicly available videos regarding cervical fusion may not be an adequate tool for patient education at this time.