Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
1.
Br J Pain ; 18(2): 137-147, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38545495

RESUMEN

Objective: Incremental healthcare costs attributed to back pain, and characterisation by patient and clinical factors have rarely been documented. This study aimed to assess annual healthcare resource utilisation and costs associated with back pain in primary care. Methods: Using the IQVIA Medical Research Data (IMRD), patients with back pain were identified (study period: 01 January 2006 to 31 December 2015) using diagnostic records and analgesics prescriptions (n = 133,341), and propensity score matched 1:1 to patients without back pain. The annual incremental costs of back pain associated with consultations and prescriptions were estimated and extrapolated to a national level. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by restricting the study population to the most recent diagnosis of back pain. Variations in cost were assessed stratified by gender, age-groups, deprivation, and comorbidity categories. Results: The mean age was 57 years, and 62% were females in both the case and control groups. The total incremental healthcare costs associated with back pain was £32.5 million in 2015 (£35.9 million in 2020), with per-patient cost of £244 (£265 in 2020) per year. On a national level, this translated to an estimated £3.2 billion (£3.5 billion in 2020). Eighty percent of the costs were attributed to consultations; and female gender, older age, higher deprivation, and higher comorbidity were all associated with increased mean healthcare costs of patients with back pain. Conclusion: Our findings confirm the substantial healthcare costs attributed to back pain, even with primacy care costs only. The data also revealed significant cost variations across socio-demographic and clinical factors.

2.
BMC Prim Care ; 24(1): 245, 2023 11 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37986044

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The economic impact of managing long COVID in primary care is unknown. We estimated the costs of primary care consultations associated with long COVID and explored the relationship between risk factors and costs. METHODS: Data were obtained on non-hospitalised adults from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum primary care database. We used propensity score matching with an incremental cost method to estimate additional primary care consultation costs associated with long COVID (12 weeks after COVID-19) at an individual and UK national level. We applied multivariable regression models to estimate the association between risk factors and consultations costs beyond 12 weeks from acute COVID-19. RESULTS: Based on an analysis of 472,173 patients with COVID-19 and 472,173 unexposed individuals, the annual incremental cost of primary care consultations associated with long COVID was £2.44 per patient and £23,382,452 at the national level. Among patients with COVID-19, a long COVID diagnosis and reporting of longer-term symptoms were associated with a 43% and 44% increase in primary care consultation costs respectively, compared to patients without long COVID symptoms. Older age, female sex, obesity, being from a white ethnic group, comorbidities and prior consultation frequency were all associated with increased primary care consultation costs. CONCLUSIONS: The costs of primary care consultations associated with long COVID in non-hospitalised adults are substantial. Costs are significantly higher among those diagnosed with long COVID, those with long COVID symptoms, older adults, females, and those with obesity and comorbidities.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Derivación y Consulta , Atención Primaria de Salud , Obesidad/epidemiología , Obesidad/terapia , Reino Unido/epidemiología
3.
Clin Ther ; 45(11): 1087-1091, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37914585

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, affecting over 523 million people globally. Atherosclerotic diseases, particularly ischemic heart disease (IHD) and stroke, are the primary mediators of CVD burden and trends, with half of CVD deaths attributed to IHD, and another quarter to ischemic stroke. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of world-wide trends in the burden of atherosclerotic CVD. METHODS: A literature review of published studies reporting regional or global trends or burden of CVD was undertaken, with a specific focus on atherosclerotic-mediated CVDs. FINDINGS: While long-term trends in age-standardized rates of CVD mortality and incidence indicate substantial declines in disease burden, the impact of population growth and ageing has contributed to a continued increase in the absolute number of people living with CVD. Additionally, when data are restricted to the most recent decade, there are indications that even declines in age-standardized CVD rates may have attenuated. Trends are also heterogeneous across countries and regions, with a relative increase in CVD burden in developing countries and differing trends within countries. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in substantial short-term reductions in hospitalization rates for major atherosclerotic CVDs including acute coronary syndromes and heart failure in some countries. IMPLICATIONS: Recent attenuation of declines in atherosclerotic CVDs with increasing absolute burden has significant implications for health systems and resource availability, with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on longer-term trends in CVD yet to be clearly established.


Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis , COVID-19 , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Isquemia Miocárdica , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Pandemias , Salud Global , Aterosclerosis/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología
4.
Neuroepidemiology ; 57(6): 423-432, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37751719

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Researchers apply varying definitions when measuring stroke incidence using administrative data. We aimed to investigate the sensitivity of incidence estimates to varying definitions of stroke and lookback periods and to provide updated incidence rates and trends for Western Australia (WA). METHODS: We used linked state-wide hospital and death data from 1985 to 2017 to identify incident strokes from 2005 to 2017. A standard definition was applied which included strokes coded as the principal hospital diagnosis or the underlying cause of death, with a 10-year lookback used to clear prevalent cases. Alternative definitions were compared against the standard definition by percentage difference in case numbers. Age-standardised incidence rates were calculated, and age- and sex-adjusted Poisson regression models were used to estimate incidence trends. RESULTS: The standard definition with a 10-year lookback period captured 31,274 incident strokes. Capture increased by 19.3% when including secondary diagnoses, 4.1% when including nontraumatic subdural and extradural haemorrhage, and 8.1% when including associated causes of death. Excluding death records reduced capture by 11.1%. A 20-year lookback reduced over-ascertainment by 2.0%, and a 1-year lookback increased capture by 13.3%. Incidence declined 0.6% annually (95% confidence interval -0.9, -0.3). Annual reductions were similar for most definitions except when death records were excluded (-0.1%, CI: -0.4, 0.2) and with the shortest lookback periods (greatest annual reduction). CONCLUSION: Stroke incidence has declined in WA. Differing methods of identifying stroke influence estimates of incidence to a greater extent than estimates of trends. Reductions in stroke incidence over time are primarily driven by declines in fatal strokes.


Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Incidencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Hospitales , Factores Sexuales
5.
Patient Educ Couns ; 112: 107713, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37003160

RESUMEN

First-degree relatives (FDRs) of people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are increasingly recruited to prediction and prevention studies. Access to FDRs is usually via their proband with RA. Quantitative data on predictors of family risk communication are lacking. RA patients completed a questionnaire assessing likelihood of communicating RA risk information to their FDRs, demographic variables, disease impact, illness perceptions, autonomy preferences, interest in FDRs taking a predictive test for RA, dispositional openness, family functioning, and attitudes towards predictive testing. Ordinal regression examined associations between patients' characteristics and their median likelihood of communicating RA risk to FDRs. Questionnaires were completed by 482 patients. The majority (75.1%) were likely/extremely likely to communicate RA risk information to FDRs, especially their children. Decision-making preferences, interest in FDRs taking a predictive test, and beliefs that risk knowledge would increase people's empowerment over their health increased patients' odds of being likely to communicate RA risk information to FDRs. Beliefs that risk information would cause stress to their relatives decreased odds that patients would be likely to communicate RA risk. These findings will inform the development of resources to support family communication about RA risk.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Autoanticuerpos , Niño , Humanos , Artritis Reumatoide/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Familia , Pacientes
6.
HIV Med ; 24(5): 640-647, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35934808

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The impact of HIV infection on the aging process is disputed and largely unknown. We aimed to identify whether people living with HIV experience premature, accelerated, and/or accentuated aging by investigating the development of four age-related non-communicable diseases in people living with versus without HIV. METHODS: This population-based matched cohort study design used UK-based primary care electronic health records from the IQVIA Medical Research Database. Between January 2000 and January 2020, all people living with and without HIV aged ≥18 years were eligible. Outcomes included cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and chronic kidney disease (CKD), which were identified by Read codes. We used age at diagnosis to investigate premature aging and age at exit date to investigate accentuation and acceleration. For each outcome, people with and without HIV were excluded if they had the outcome of interest at baseline. Participants were matched based on propensity scores (1:1 ratio). Linear regression was used to report any difference in age at diagnosis between the two groups and to report the prevalence trends for age at exit date. RESULTS: In total, 8880 people living with HIV were matched with 8880 people without HIV and were found to have an earlier onset of CVD (54.5 vs. 56.8; p = 0.002). Similarly, people living with HIV had an earlier onset of hypertension (49.7 vs. 51.4; p = 0.002). No difference was found for T2DM or CKD (53.4 vs. 52.6; p = 0.368 and 57.6 vs. 58.1; p = 0.483, respectively). The burden of CKD increased over time, whereas no difference in the burden was found for the other conditions. CONCLUSION: The earlier development of CVD and hypertension in people living with HIV than in those without HIV indicates premature aging, whereas the increased burden of CKD indicates accelerated aging.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento Prematuro , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Infecciones por VIH , Hipertensión , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Envejecimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Envejecimiento , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología
7.
BMC Med ; 20(1): 346, 2022 10 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36224602

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of some immune-mediated diseases (IMDs) shows distinct differences between populations of different ethnicities. The aim of this study was to determine if the age at diagnosis of common IMDs also differed between different ethnic groups in the UK, suggestive of distinct influences of ethnicity on disease pathogenesis. METHODS: This was a population-based retrospective primary care study. Linear regression provided unadjusted and adjusted estimates of age at diagnosis for common IMDs within the following ethnic groups: White, South Asian, African-Caribbean and Mixed-race/Other. Potential disease risk confounders in the association between ethnicity and diagnosis age including sex, smoking, body mass index and social deprivation (Townsend quintiles) were adjusted for. The analysis was replicated using data from UK Biobank (UKB). RESULTS: After adjusting for risk confounders, we observed that individuals from South Asian, African-Caribbean and Mixed-race/Other ethnicities were diagnosed with IMDs at a significantly younger age than their White counterparts for almost all IMDs. The difference in the diagnosis age (ranging from 2 to 30 years earlier) varied for each disease and by ethnicity. For example, rheumatoid arthritis was diagnosed at age 49, 48 and 47 years in individuals of African-Caribbean, South Asian and Mixed-race/Other ethnicities respectively, compared to 56 years in White ethnicities. The earlier diagnosis of most IMDs observed was validated in UKB although with a smaller effect size. CONCLUSION: Individuals from non-White ethnic groups in the UK had an earlier age at diagnosis for several IMDs than White adults.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Población Blanca , Adolescente , Adulto , Población Negra , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
8.
Arthritis Res Ther ; 24(1): 231, 2022 10 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36229868

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common chronic condition but its association with other chronic conditions and mortality is largely unknown. This study aimed to use latent class analysis (LCA) of 30 comorbidities in patients with OA and matched controls without OA to identify clusters of comorbidities and examine the associations between the clusters, opioid use, and mortality. METHODS: A matched cohort analysis of patients derived from the IQVIA Medical Research Data (IMRD-UK) database between 2000 and 2019. 418,329 patients with newly diagnosed OA were matched to 243,170 patients without OA to identify comorbidity phenotypes. Further analysis investigated the effect of opioid use on mortality in individuals with OA and their matched controls. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range (IQR)) number of comorbidities was 2 (1-4) and 1 (0-3) in the OA and control groups respectively. LCA identified six comorbidity phenotypes in individuals with and without OA. Clusters with a high prevalence of comorbidities were characterised by hypertension, circulatory, and metabolic diseases. We identified a comorbidity cluster with the aforementioned comorbidities plus a high prevalence of chronic kidney disease, which was associated with twice the hazard of mortality in hand OA with a hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) of 2.53 (2.05-3.13) compared to the hazard observed in hip/knee OA subtype 1.33 (1.24-1.42). The impact of opioid use in the first 12 months on hazards of mortality was significantly greater for weak opioids and strong opioids across all groups HR (95% CI) ranging from 1.11 (1.07-11.6) to 1.80 (1.69-1.92)). There was however no evidence of association between NSAID use and altered risk of mortality. CONCLUSION: This study identified six comorbidity clusters in individuals with OA and matched controls within this cohort. Opioid use and comorbidity clusters were differentially associated with the risk of mortality. The analyses may help shape the development of future interventions or health services that take into account the impact of these comorbidity clusters.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Análisis de Clases Latentes , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/tratamiento farmacológico , Fenotipo , Reino Unido/epidemiología
9.
Arthritis Res Ther ; 24(1): 201, 2022 08 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35986399

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is small vessel vasculitis with heterogeneous clinical presentation. In the present population-based cohort study, we classified patients with GPA based on clinical features at presentation using an unsupervised clustering approach and compared their mortality, infections and frequency of comorbidities. METHODS: In this open cohort study, de-identified primary care data of patients with GPA included in the IQVIA Medical Research Data database between 1 January 1995 and 25 September 2019 was analysed retrospectively. Latent class analysis was performed to create symptom clusters of patients based on 16 categories of symptoms representing various organ involvement. All-cause mortality of resultant clusters was compared after adjusting for age, sex, Townsend deprivation quintile and smoking status at index date using extended Cox proportional hazards models. Prescription of antibiotics, considered as an indirect indicator of recurrent bacterial infection, was compared using a recurrent event model, after adjusting for quarterly use of steroid as a time-dependent covariate. Cumulative frequencies of common comorbidities were compared among the clusters at index visit, 1-year and 3-year follow-up. RESULTS: Altogether, 649 patients with GPA [median age 60.0 (IQR: 49.6-70.1)] were included. Three clusters were identified: patients with limited disease mainly with involvement of ENT and cough were classified into cluster 1 (n = 426); cluster 2 had generalised non-renal disease (n = 176); while patients in cluster 3 had renal-predominant disease (n = 47). Many patients in cluster 1 developed generalised disease at the end of 1 year. Mortality in clusters 2 and 3 was higher compared with cluster 1. Mortality in cluster 1 itself was 68% higher than the general population without GPA. The duration of antibiotics prescription and frequency of coexisting medical illnesses was also higher in clusters 2 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: In a primary care setting, patients with GPA can be classified into three distinct clusters with different prognosis, susceptibility to recurrent infections and presence of comorbidities. The tendency of cluster 1 to evolve into a more generalised disease raises questions about current immunosuppressive treatment approaches in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Granulomatosis con Poliangitis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Análisis por Conglomerados , Estudios de Cohortes , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/epidemiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
10.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 56(5): 814-822, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35770611

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and mental illnesses experience worse IBD outcomes. AIM: To describe the incidence of mental illnesses, including deliberate self-harm, in IBD patients. METHODS: A population-based retrospective cohort study using IQVIA medical research data of a primary care database covering the whole UK, between January 1995 and January 2021. IBD patients of all ages were matched 4:1 by demographics and primary care practice to unexposed controls. Following exclusion of patients with mental ill health at study entry, adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of developing depression, anxiety, deliberate self-harm, severe mental illness and insomnia were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We included 48,799 incident IBD patients: 28,352 with ulcerative colitis and 20,447 with Crohn's disease. Incidence rate ratios of mental illness were higher in IBD patients than controls (all p < 0.001): deliberate self-harm 1.31 (95% CI 1.16-1.47), anxiety 1.17 (1.11-1.24), depression 1.36 (1.31-1.42) and insomnia 1.62 (1.54-1.69). Patients with Crohn's disease were more likely to develop deliberate self-harm HR 1.51 (95% CI 1.28-1.78), anxiety 1.38 (1.16-1.65), depression 1.36 (1.26-1.47) and insomnia 1.74 (1.62-1.86). Patients with IBD are at increased risk of deliberate self-harm (HR 1.20 [1.07-1.35]). The incidence rate ratios of mental illnesses were particularly high during the first year following IBD diagnosis: anxiety 1.28 (1.13-1.46), depression 1.62 (1.48-1.77) and insomnia 1.99 (1.78-2.21). CONCLUSION: Deliberate self-harm, depression, anxiety and insomnia were more frequent among patients with IBD. IBD is independently associated with an increased risk of deliberate self-harm.


Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedad de Crohn , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Crohn/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/complicaciones , Reino Unido/epidemiología
11.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 88(9): 4199-4210, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35474585

RESUMEN

AIMS: Several observational studies have examined the potential protective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) use on the risk of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and have reported contradictory results owing to confounding and time-related biases. We aimed to assess the risk of AMD in a base cohort of patients aged 40 years and above with hypertension among new users of ACE-I compared to an active comparator cohort of new users of calcium channel blockers (CCB) using data obtained from IQVIA Medical Research Data, a primary care database in the UK. METHODS: In this study, 53 832 and 43 106 new users of ACE-I and CCB were included between 1995 and 2019, respectively. In an on-treatment analysis, patients were followed up from the time of index drug initiation to the date of AMD diagnosis, loss to follow-up, discontinuation or switch to the comparator drug. A comprehensive range of covariates were used to estimate propensity scores to weight and match new users of ACE-I and CCB. Standardized mortality ratio weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios of developing AMD. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 2 years (interquartile range 1-5 years), the incidence rate of AMD was 2.4 (95% confidence interval 2.2-2.6) and 2.2 (2.0-2.4) per 1000 person-years among the weighted new users of ACE-I and CCB, respectively. There was no association of ACE-I use on the risk of AMD compared to CCB use in either the propensity score weighted or matched, on-treatment analysis (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.07 [95% confidence interval 0.90-1.27] and 0.87 [0.71-1.07], respectively). CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that the use of ACE-I is associated with risk of AMD in patients with hypertension.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Degeneración Macular , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Incidencia , Degeneración Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Degeneración Macular/epidemiología
12.
BMJ Open ; 12(4): e060413, 2022 04 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35473737

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with COVID-19 frequently experience symptoms and impaired quality of life beyond 4-12 weeks, commonly referred to as Long COVID. Whether Long COVID is one or several distinct syndromes is unknown. Establishing the evidence base for appropriate therapies is needed. We aim to evaluate the symptom burden and underlying pathophysiology of Long COVID syndromes in non-hospitalised individuals and evaluate potential therapies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A cohort of 4000 non-hospitalised individuals with a past COVID-19 diagnosis and 1000 matched controls will be selected from anonymised primary care records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, and invited by their general practitioners to participate on a digital platform (Atom5). Individuals will report symptoms, quality of life, work capability and patient-reported outcome measures. Data will be collected monthly for 1 year.Statistical clustering methods will be used to identify distinct Long COVID-19 symptom clusters. Individuals from the four most prevalent clusters and two control groups will be invited to participate in the BioWear substudy which will further phenotype Long COVID symptom clusters by measurement of immunological parameters and actigraphy.We will review existing evidence on interventions for postviral syndromes and Long COVID to map and prioritise interventions for each newly characterised Long COVID syndrome. Recommendations will be made using the cumulative evidence in an expert consensus workshop. A virtual supportive intervention will be coproduced with patients and health service providers for future evaluation.Individuals with lived experience of Long COVID will be involved throughout this programme through a patient and public involvement group. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Solihull Research Ethics Committee, West Midlands (21/WM/0203). Research findings will be presented at international conferences, in peer-reviewed journals, to Long COVID patient support groups and to policymakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 1567490.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Síndrome , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19
13.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 61(8): 3223-3233, 2022 08 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34850849

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: There is increasing interest in prediction and prevention of RA. It is important to understand the views of those at risk to inform the development of effective approaches. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of RA patients are at increased risk of RA. This study assessed predictors of their interest in predictive testing for RA. METHODS: Questionnaires were completed by RA patients (provided with their questionnaire by a healthcare professional) and their FDRs (provided with their questionnaire by their RA proband). FDR surveys assessed interest in taking a predictive test, demographic variables, perceived RA risk, attitudes about predictive testing, autonomy preferences, illness perceptions, avoidance coping and health anxiety. Patient surveys included demographic variables, disease impact, RA duration and treatment. Ordinal logistic regression examined the association between FDRs' characteristics and their interest in predictive testing. Generalized estimating equations assessed associations between patient characteristics and FDRs' interest in predictive testing. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-six FDRs responded. Paired data from the RA proband were available for 292. The proportion of FDRs interested in predictive testing was 91.3%. Information-seeking preferences, beliefs that predictive testing can increase empowerment over health and positive attitudes about risk knowledge were associated with increased interest. Beliefs that predictive testing could cause psychological harm predicted lower interest. Patient characteristics of the proband were not associated with FDRs' interest. CONCLUSIONS: FDRs' interest in predictive testing for RA was high, and factors associated with interest were identified. These findings will inform the development of predictive strategies and informational resources for those at risk.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Artritis Reumatoide/genética , Familia/psicología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
RMD Open ; 8(2)2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36597990

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To define variables associated with perceived risk of developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with RA. METHODS: Patients with RA and their FDRs were invited to complete cross-sectional surveys. FDR and index patient responses were linked. FDRs' perceived absolute risk, comparative risk, experiential risk and worry about risk were assessed using 5-point Likert scales. FDR predictor variables included demographics, illness perceptions and psychosocial variables. Patient predictors of FDR perceived risk were assessed. Binary logistic regression examined the relationship between FDR characteristics and perceived risk of RA. Generalised estimating equations assessed whether patient variables predicted FDR's perceived risk. RESULTS: 396 FDRs returned a survey. 395 FDRs provided sufficient data and were included in analysis. Paired data from 213 patients were available for 291 of these FDRs. All measures of perceived risk were inter-correlated. 65.2% of FDRs perceived themselves to be 'likely' or 'very likely' to develop RA in their lifetime. Relationship with index patient, high health anxiety, female gender, long perceived RA duration, high perceived concern about RA, negative perceived emotional impact of RA and low perceptions of how well treatment would control RA were all associated with increased FDRs' perceived risk. Patient characteristics did not associate with FDRs' risk perceptions. CONCLUSIONS: FDRs' perceived risk of RA was high. Key predictors included being a child of a patient with RA, higher health anxiety and lower perceptions of RA treatment control. An understanding of these predictors will inform the development of tailored risk communication resources and preventive clinical strategies for RA.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Autoanticuerpos , Niño , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Artritis Reumatoide/etiología , Modelos Logísticos
15.
BMJ Open ; 11(12): e048296, 2021 12 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34924359

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To identify the association between periodontal diseases (gingivitis and periodontitis) and chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease, cardiometabolic disease, autoimmune disease and mental ill health. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: IQVIA Medical Research Data-UK between 1 January 1995 and 1 January 2019. PARTICIPANTS: 64 379 adult patients with a general practitioner recorded diagnosis of periodontal disease (exposed patients) were matched to 251 161 unexposed patients by age, sex, deprivation and registration date. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic regression models accounting for covariates of clinical importance were undertaken to estimate the adjusted OR (aOR) of having chronic diseases at baseline in the exposed compared with the unexposed group. Incidence rates for each outcome of interest were then provided followed by the calculation of adjusted HRs using cox regression modelling to describe the risk of outcome development in each group. RESULTS: The average age at cohort entry was 45 years and the median follow-up was 3.4 years. At study entry, the exposed cohort had an increased likelihood of having a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (aOR 1.43; 95% CI 1.38 to 1.48), cardiometabolic disease (aOR 1.16; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.19), autoimmune disease (aOR 1.33; 95% CI 1.28 to 1.37) and mental ill health (aOR 1.79; 95% CI 1.75 to 1.83) compared with the unexposed group. During the follow-up of individuals without pre-existing outcomes of interest, the exposed group had an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.23), cardiometabolic disease (HR 1.07; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.10), autoimmune disease (HR 1.33; 95% CI 1.26 to 1.40) and mental ill health (HR 1.37; 95% CI 1.33 to 1.42) compared with the unexposed group. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, periodontal diseases appeared to be associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular, cardiometabolic, autoimmune diseases and mental ill health. Periodontal diseases are very common; therefore, an increased risk of other chronic diseases represent a substantial public health burden.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Enfermedades Periodontales , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Enfermedades Periodontales/complicaciones , Enfermedades Periodontales/epidemiología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
16.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251406, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33974661

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Back pain is a common and costly health problem worldwide. There is yet a lack of consistent methodologies to estimate the economic burden of back pain to society. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the methodologies used in the published cost of illness (COI) literature for estimating the direct and indirect costs attributed to back pain, and to present a summary of the estimated cost burden. METHODS: Six electronic databases were searched to identify COI studies of back pain published in English up to February 2021. A total of 1,588 abstracts were screened, and 55 full-text studies were subsequently reviewed. After applying the inclusion criteria, 45 studies pertaining to the direct and indirect costs of back pain were analysed. RESULTS: The studies reported data on 15 industrialised countries. The national cost estimates of back pain in 2015 USD ranged from $259 million ($29.1 per capita) in Sweden to $71.6 billion ($868.4 per capita) in Germany. There was high heterogeneity among the studies in terms of the methodologies used for analysis and the resulting costs reported. Most of the studies assessed costs from a societal perspective (n = 29). The magnitude and accuracy of the reported costs were influenced by the case definition of back pain, the source of data used, the cost components included and the analysis method. Among the studies that provided both direct and indirect cost estimates (n = 15), indirect costs resulting from lost or reduced work productivity far outweighed the direct costs. CONCLUSION: Back pain imposes substantial economic burden on society. This review demonstrated that existing published COI studies of back pain used heterogeneous approaches reflecting a lack of consensus on methodology. A standardised methodological approach is required to increase credibility of the findings of COI studies and improve comparison of estimates across studies.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de Espalda/economía , Costo de Enfermedad , Costos y Análisis de Costo/métodos , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Japón , América del Norte
17.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 262, 2021 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33722197

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors have been postulated to influence susceptibility to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study investigated whether there is an association between their prescription and the incidence of COVID-19 and all-cause mortality. METHODS: We conducted a propensity-score matched cohort study comparing the incidence of COVID-19 among patients with hypertension prescribed angiotensin-converting enzyme I (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers (ARBs) to those treated with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in a large UK-based primary care database (The Health Improvement Network). We estimated crude incidence rates for confirmed/suspected COVID-19 in each drug exposure group. We used Cox proportional hazards models to produce adjusted hazard ratios for COVID-19. We assessed all-cause mortality as a secondary outcome. RESULTS: The incidence rate of COVID-19 among users of ACE inhibitors and CCBs was 9.3 per 1000 person-years (83 of 18,895 users [0.44%]) and 9.5 per 1000 person-years (85 of 18,895 [0.45%]), respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio was 0.92 (95% CI 0.68 to 1.26). The incidence rate among users of ARBs was 15.8 per 1000 person-years (79 out of 10,623 users [0.74%]). The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.38 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.95). There were no significant associations between use of RAS inhibitors and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Use of ACE inhibitors was not associated with the risk of COVID-19 whereas use of ARBs was associated with a statistically non-significant increase compared to the use of CCBs. However, no significant associations were observed between prescription of either ACE inhibitors or ARBs and all-cause mortality.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/complicaciones , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , COVID-19/mortalidad , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/efectos adversos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina , Reino Unido , Adulto Joven
18.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 106(5): 1255-1268, 2021 04 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33560344

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes has emerged as an important risk factor for mortality from COVID-19. Metformin, the most commonly prescribed glucose-lowering agent, has been proposed to influence susceptibility to and outcomes of COVID-19 via multiple mechanisms. We investigated whether, in patients with diabetes, metformin is associated with susceptibility to COVID-19 and its outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a propensity score-matched cohort study with active comparators using a large UK primary care dataset. Adults with type 2 diabetes patients and a current prescription for metformin and other glucose-lowering agents (MF+) were compared to those with a current prescription for glucose-lowering agents that did not include metformin (MF-). Outcomes were confirmed COVID-19, suspected/confirmed COVID-19, and associated mortality. A negative control outcome analysis (back pain) was also performed. RESULTS: There were 29 558 and 10 271 patients in the MF+ and MF- groups, respectively, who met the inclusion criteria. In the propensity score-matched analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios for suspected/confirmed COVID-19, confirmed COVID-19, and COVID-19-related mortality were 0.85 (95% CI 0.67, 1.08), 0.80 (95% CI 0.49, 1.30), and 0.87 (95% CI 0.34, 2.20) respectively. The negative outcome control analysis did not suggest unobserved confounding. CONCLUSION: Current prescription of metformin was not associated with the risk of COVID-19 or COVID-19-related mortality. It is safe to continue prescribing metformin to improve glycemic control in patients with.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , COVID-19/complicaciones , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos
19.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 60(12): 5567-5575, 2021 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33590842

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incident risk of RA in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to explore the role of glycaemic control and associated therapeutic use in the onset of RA. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort study using patients derived from the IQVIA Medical Research Data (IMRD-UK) database between 1995 and 2019. A total of 224 551 newly diagnosed patients with T2DM were matched to 449 101 patients without T2DM and followed up to assess their risk of RA. Further analyses investigated the effect of glycaemic control, statin use and anti-diabetic drugs on the relationship between T2DM and RA using a time-dependent Cox regression model. RESULTS: During the study period, the incidence of RA was 8.1 and 10.6 per 10 000 person-years in the exposed and unexposed groups, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 0.73 (95% CI 0.67, 0.79). In patients who had not used statins in their lifetime, the aHR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.69, 1.14). When quantifying the effects of glycaemic control, anti-diabetic drugs and statins using time-varying analyses, there was no association with glycaemic control [aHR 1.00 (95% CI 0.99, 1.00)], use of metformin [aHR 1.00 (95% CI 0.82, 1.22)], dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors [DPP4is; aHR 0.94 (95% CI 0.71, 1.24)] and the development of RA. However, statins demonstrated a protective effect for progression of RA in those with T2DM [aHR 0.76 (95% CI 0.66, 0.88)], with evidence of a duration-response relationship. CONCLUSION: There is a reduced risk of RA in patients with T2DM that may be attributable to the use of statins.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/etiología , Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Control Glucémico/métodos , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Artritis Reumatoide/prevención & control , Bases de Datos Factuales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
20.
Arthritis Rheumatol ; 73(5): 731-739, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33185016

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify whether active use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) increases susceptibility to developing suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to the use of other common analgesics. METHODS: We performed a propensity score-matched cohort study with active comparators, using a large UK primary care data set. The cohort consisted of adult patients age ≥18 years with osteoarthritis (OA) who were followed up from January 30 to July 31, 2020. Patients prescribed an NSAID (excluding topical preparations) were compared to those prescribed either co-codamol (paracetamol and codeine) or co-dydramol (paracetamol and dihydrocodeine). A total of 13,202 patients prescribed NSAIDs were identified, compared to 12,457 patients prescribed the comparator drugs. The primary outcome measure was the documentation of suspected or confirmed COVID-19, and the secondary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: During follow-up, the incidence rates of suspected/confirmed COVID-19 were 15.4 and 19.9 per 1,000 person-years in the NSAID-exposed group and comparator group, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios for suspected or confirmed COVID-19 among the unmatched and propensity score-matched OA cohorts, using data from clinical consultations in primary care settings, were 0.82 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.62-1.10) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.57-1.11), respectively, and adjusted hazard ratios for the risk of all-cause mortality were 0.97 (95% CI 0.75-1.27) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.61-1.20), respectively. There was no effect modification by age or sex. CONCLUSION: No increase in the risk of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 or mortality was observed among patients with OA in a primary care setting who were prescribed NSAIDs as compared to those who received comparator drugs. These results are reassuring and suggest that in the absence of acute illness, NSAIDs can be safely prescribed during the ongoing pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Mortalidad , Osteoartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Causas de Muerte , Codeína/análogos & derivados , Codeína/uso terapéutico , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA