RESUMEN
(±)-Hypecurvone A (1) and B (2), two new undescribed phenyl polyketides, along with seven known analogues (3-9) were isolated from the whole plant of Hypericum curvisepalum. Chiral separation of 1 and 2 yielded two pairs of enantiomers 1a/1b and 2a/2b, respectively. The structures of these compounds were elucidated by extensive spectroscopic analyses and ECD spectra simulations. All isolates exhibited moderate cytotoxicity against human hepatocellular carcinoma SMMC-7721 cells, and compound 3 also showed weak cytotoxicity toward MGC-803 cells. The cytotoxicity of these compounds was found to be related to enhanced mitochondria-mediated apoptosis and inhibition of the G2/M phase of the cell cycle.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis (OP) is characterized as low bone mass, bone microarchitecture breakdown and bone fragility. The increase of oxidative stress could lead to breakdown in the balance of bone formation and resorption which gives rise to OP. Nrf2 is a transcription factor which takes part in oxidative stress and recently was reported that it can regulate the occurrence of OP. Salidroside (SAL) with the efficacies of anti-oxidation, anti-aging and bone-protection is one of the active ingredients in Ligustri Lucidi Fructus, a traditional Chinese medicinal herb. Nevertheless, few studies have explored the potential mechanism of SAL preventing OP development from the perspective of oxidative stress intervention. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the pharmacological effect and molecular mechanisms of SAL on OP. STUDY DESIGNS AND METHODS: A tert-butyl hydroperoxide (t-BHP)-induced oxidative stress model was applied for investigating the effects of SAL in vitro, and an ovariectomized (OVX) model was used for in vivo study on the effect of SAL for OP. Related pharmacodynamic actions and molecular mechanisms of SAL were explored in both rat osteoblasts (ROBs) and OVX rats. Network biology and cell metabolomics were performed for further investigating the correlation and association among potential biomarkers, targets and pathways. RESULTS: SAL reduced levels of ROS and lipid peroxidation (LPO), increased activities of antioxidant enzymes like GPx and SOD, and enhanced osteogenic differentiation in t-BHP-induced ROBs and OVX rats. Mechanistic studies showed SAL prevented OP development and reduced oxidative damage in ROBs and OVX rats through up-regulating Nrf2 expression and facilitating its nuclear translocation. The joint analysis of network biology and cell metabolomics revealed that galactose metabolism and fatty acid metabolism could be the major influenced pathways following treatment with SAL. CONCLUSION: SAL could protect against OP by inhibiting oxidative stress, promoting osteogenesis through the up-regulation of Nrf2 and intervening galactose metabolism and fatty acid metabolism. Our study implied that SAL may be a potential drug to treat OP.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Our aim was to search for clinical predictors of good glycemic control in patients starting or intensifying oral hypoglycemic pharmacological therapy. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective cohort of 499 diabetic subjects was enrolled in this study: patients with newly diagnosed diabetes (NDM group) or poor glycemic control with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) (PDM group). All subjects then started or intensified OADs therapy and followed up for 91â¯days. Glycemic control was determined according to HbA1c at day 91 with HbA1c <7% considered good. RESULTS: The proportions of patients with good glycemic control after follow up for 91â¯days were 66.9% and 34.8% in NDM group and PDM group respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that the change in GA at 28â¯days was the only predictor of good glycemic control in NDM patients (ORâ¯=â¯1.630, 95% CI 1.300-2.044, Pâ¯<â¯0.001). In PDM patients, changes in GA at 28â¯days, CPI, baseline HbA1c, diabetic duration, and BMI were all independent predictors of good glycemic control (All Pâ¯<â¯0.05). CONCLUSIONS: GA decline is a good predictor of future success in newly diagnosed patients. In patients intensifying therapy, beside GA decline, other individualized clinical characteristics should also be considered.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Control Glucémico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Albúmina Sérica/análisis , Administración Oral , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Glucemia/análisis , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Productos Finales de Glicación Avanzada , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/sangre , Hiperglucemia/diagnóstico , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Albúmina Sérica GlicadaRESUMEN
Doxorubicin (DOX) is a wide spectrum antitumor drug. However, its clinical application is limited due to the cardiotoxicity. Carvedilol (CAR) is a ß-blocker used to treat high blood pressure and heart failure. Accordingly, supplementation with natural antioxidants or plant extracts exerts protective effects against various injury in vivo. Carnosic acid (CAA), the principal constituent of rosemary, has various biological activities, including antioxidant, antitumor, and anti-inflammatory. Here, heart injury mouse model was established using DOX (20 mg/kg) in vivo. And cardiac muscle cell line of H9C2 was subjected to 0.5⯵M of DOX for 24 h in vitro. Then, the protective effects of CAA and CAR alone, or the two in combination on DOX-induced cardiotoxicity in vivo and in vitro were explored. The results indicated that both CAA and CAR, when used alone, were moderately effective in attenuating DOX-induced cardiotoxicity. The combination of two drugs functioned synergistically to ameliorate cardiac injury caused by DOX, as evidenced by the significantly reduced collagen accumulation and improved dysfunction of heart. CAA and CAR exhibited stronger anti-oxidative role in DOX-treated mice partly by augmenting the expression and activities of the anti-oxidative enzymes. In addition, inflammatory response was significantly suppressed by the two in combination, proved by the decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines (COX2, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1ß and IL-18), which was associated with the inactivation of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB). Furthermore, DOX-stirred apoptosis and autophagy were dramatically attenuated by the co-treatments of CAA and CAR through down-regulating cleaved Caspase-3 and LC3B signaling pathways. The effects of CAA and CAR combination against cardiotoxicity were observed in H9C2 cells with DOX stimulation. Our findings above suggested that the use of CAR and CAA in combination could be expected to have synergistic efficacy and significant potential against cardiotoxicity induced by DOX.
Asunto(s)
Abietanos/farmacología , Cardiotoxicidad/prevención & control , Carvedilol/farmacología , Doxorrubicina/toxicidad , Abietanos/administración & dosificación , Animales , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/toxicidad , Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Antioxidantes/farmacología , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Autofagia/efectos de los fármacos , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Carvedilol/administración & dosificación , Línea Celular , Citocinas/metabolismo , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Inflamación/inducido químicamente , Inflamación/prevención & control , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Ratas , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
AIMS: This study was to determine whether serum glycated albumin (GA) was a better indicator of glycemic control than hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) when starting a new treatment regimen for type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients, or patients who had poor glycemic control with oral hypoglycemic agents, were enrolled at 10 hospitals in Beijing. Serum GA, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), and C-peptide were assayed on Days 0, 14, 28, and 91 after treatment. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled. Mean FBG, GA and HbA1c decreased significantly in patients at Days 14, 28, and 91. In patients with improved glycemic control, the reduction of GA and HbA1c levels was 10.5±13.3% vs. 5.1±5.4% on Day 14, 16.0±13.4% vs. 9.0±7.0% on Day 28, and 18.0±16.7% vs. 18.3±9.4% on Day 91, respectively, compared with baseline values. Changes in GA on Day 14, 28 and 91 were all closely correlated with changes in HbA1c on Day 91. Change in GA on Day 14 was correlated with treatment effectiveness evaluated by HbA1c on Day 91. CONCLUSIONS: GA may be a useful marker for assessing glycemic control at an early stage of new diabetes treatment and assist in guiding adjustments to treatment and therapy.