Kinect-based objective assessment of the acute levodopa challenge test in parkinsonism: a feasibility study.

INTRODUCTION: The acute levodopa challenge test (ALCT) is an important and valuable examination but there are still some shortcomings with it. We aimed to objectively assess ALCT based on a depth camera and filter out the best indicators. METHODS: Fifty-nine individuals with parkinsonism completed ALCT and the improvement rate (IR, which indicates the change in value before and after levodopa administration) of the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS III) was calculated. The kinematic features of the patients' movements in both the OFF and ON states were collected with an Azure Kinect depth camera. RESULTS: The IR of MDS-UPDRS III was significantly correlated with the IRs of many kinematic features for arising from a chair, pronation-supination movements of the hand, finger tapping, toe tapping, leg agility, and gait (rs = - 0.277 ~ - 0.672, P < 0.05). Moderate to high discriminative values were found in the selected features in identifying a clinically significant response to levodopa with sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) in the range of 50-100%, 47.22%-97.22%, and 0.673-0.915, respectively. The resulting classifier combining kinematic features of toe tapping showed an excellent performance with an AUC of 0.966 (95% CI = 0.922-1.000, P < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value was 21.24% with sensitivity and specificity of 94.44% and 87.18%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility of measuring the effect of levodopa and objectively assessing ALCT based on kinematic data derived from an Azure Kinect-based system.

Kinect-based objective evaluation of bradykinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Objective: To quantify bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD) with a Kinect depth camera-based motion analysis system and to compare PD and healthy control (HC) subjects. Methods: Fifty PD patients and twenty-five HCs were recruited. The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (MDS-UPDRS III) was used to evaluate the motor symptoms of PD. Kinematic features of five bradykinesia-related motor tasks were collected using Kinect depth camera. Then, kinematic features were correlated with the clinical scales and compared between groups. Results: Significant correlations were found between kinematic features and clinical scales (P < 0.05). Compared with HCs, PD patients exhibited a significant decrease in the frequency of finger tapping (P < 0.001), hand movement (P < 0.001), hand pronation-supination movements (P = 0.005), and leg agility (P = 0.003). Meanwhile, PD patients had a significant decrease in the speed of hand movements (P = 0.003) and toe tapping (P < 0.001) compared with HCs. Several kinematic features exhibited potential diagnostic value in distinguishing PD from HCs with area under the curve (AUC) ranging from 0.684-0.894 (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the combination of motor tasks exhibited the best diagnostic value with the highest AUC of 0.955 (95% CI = 0.913-0.997, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Kinect-based motion analysis system can be applied to evaluate bradykinesia in PD. Kinematic features can be used to differentiate PD patients from HCs and combining kinematic features from different motor tasks can significantly improve the diagnostic value.

Technology-based therapy-response evaluation of axial motor symptoms under daily drug regimen of patients with Parkinson's disease.

Background: Axial disturbances are the most disabling symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Kinect-based objective measures could extract motion characteristics with high reliability and validity. Purpose: The present research aimed to quantify the therapy-response of axial motor symptoms to daily medication regimen and to explore the correlates of the improvement rate (IR) of axial motor symptoms based on a Kinect camera. Materials and methods: We enrolled 44 patients with PD and 21 healthy controls. All 65 participants performed the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III and the Kinect-based kinematic evaluation to assess arising from a chair, gait, posture, and postural stability before and after medication. Spearman's correlation analysis and multiple linear regression model were performed to explore the relationships between motor feature IR and clinical data. Results: All the features arising from a chair (P = 0.001), stride length (P = 0.001), velocity (P < 0.001), the height of foot lift (P < 0.001), and turning time (P = 0.001) improved significantly after a daily drug regimen in patients with PD. In addition, the anterior trunk flexion (lumbar level) exhibited significant improvement (P = 0.004). The IR of the axial motor symptoms score was significantly correlated with the IRs of kinematic features for gait velocity, stride length, foot lift height, and sitting speed (r s = 0.345, P = 0.022; r s = 0.382, P = 0.010; r s = 0.314, P = 0.038; r s = 0.518, P < 0.001, respectively). A multivariable regression analysis showed that the improvement in axial motor symptoms was associated with the IR of gait velocity only (ß = 0.593, 95% CI = 0.023-1.164, P = 0.042). Conclusion: Axial symptoms were not completely drug-resistant, and some kinematic features can be improved after the daily medication regimen of patients with PD.

A summary index derived from Kinect to evaluate postural abnormalities severity in Parkinson's Disease patients.

Postural abnormalities are common disabling motor complications affecting patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). We proposed a summary index for postural abnormalities (IPA) based on Kinect depth camera and explored the clinical value of this indicator. Seventy individuals with PD and thirty age-matched healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. All participants were tested using a Kinect-based system with IPA automatically obtained by algorithms. Significant correlations were detected between IPA and the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) total score (rs = 0.369, p = 0.002), MDS-UPDRS-III total score (rs = 0.431, p < 0.001), MDS-UPDRS-III 3.13 score (rs = 0.573, p < 0.001), MDS-UPDRS-III-bradykinesia score (rs = 0.311, p = 0.010), the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) (rs = 0.272, p = 0.0027) and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score (rs = -0.350, p = 0.006). The optimal cut-off value of IPA for distinguishing PD from HCs was 12.96 with a sensitivity of 97.14%, specificity of 100.00%, area under the curve (AUC) of 0.999 (0.997-1.002, p < 0.001), and adjusted AUC of 0.998 (0.993-1.000, p < 0.001). The optimal cut-off value of IPA for distinguishing between PD with and without postural abnormalities was 20.14 with a sensitivity, specificity, AUC and adjusted AUC of 77.78%, 73.53%, 0.817 (0.720-0.914, p < 0.001), and 0.783 (0.631-0.900, p < 0.001), respectively. IPA was significantly correlated to the clinical manifestations of PD patients, and could reflect the global severity of postural abnormalities in PD with important value in distinguishing PD from HCs and distinguishing PD with postural abnormalities from those without.

Automated and accurate assessment for postural abnormalities in patients with Parkinson's disease based on Kinect and machine learning.

BACKGROUND: Automated and accurate assessment for postural abnormalities is necessary to monitor the clinical progress of Parkinson's disease (PD). The combination of depth camera and machine learning makes this purpose possible. METHODS: Kinect was used to collect the postural images from 70 PD patients. The collected images were processed to extract three-dimensional body joints, which were then converted to two-dimensional body joints to obtain eight quantified coronal and sagittal features (F1-F8) of the trunk. The decision tree classifier was carried out over a data set established by the collected features and the corresponding doctors' MDS-UPDRS-III 3.13 (the 13th item of the third part of Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale) scores. An objective function was implanted to further improve the human-machine consistency. RESULTS: The automated grading of postural abnormalities for PD patients was realized with only six selected features. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the machine's and doctors' score was 0.940 (95%CI, 0.905-0.962), meaning the machine was highly consistent with the doctors' judgement. Besides, the decision tree classifier performed outstandingly, reaching 90.0% of accuracy, 95.7% of specificity and 89.1% of sensitivity in rating postural severity. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an intelligent evaluation system to provide accurate and automated assessment of trunk postural abnormalities in PD patients. This study demonstrates the practicability of our proposed method in the clinical scenario to help making the medical decision about PD.