RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify socioeconomic gaps in the administration of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for patients with atypical meningioma (AM) and secondarily to determine differences in survival between patients receiving radiation and those not receiving radiation at 12 and 60 months. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients receiving AM surgery between 2004 and 2019. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the association between receipt of adjuvant radiation and social determinants. Secondarily, Kaplan-Meir curves were used to compare overall patient survival between those that received radiation and those that did not. RESULTS: Adjuvant radiation was less likely to be administered to patients over 65 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53-22 0.77) and more likely to be administered to males (95% CI = 1.07-1.38). Compared to the Southern USA, patients were more likely to receive RT in the Northeastern (95% CI 24 = 1.40-2.05), Midwestern (95% CI = 1.06-1.54), and Western parts of the USA (95% 25 CI = 1.31-2.00). Patients residing furthest from their facility were less likely to receive radiation (95% CI = 0.65-0.98). Insured patients were more likely to receive radiation (P = 0.048) than uninsured patients. On multivariate analysis, no differences were found between racial groups regarding adjuvant radiation. For patients unstratified, radiation was shown to improve survival at 12 and 60 months. CONCLUSIONS: Disparities exist in the administration of adjuvant RT for AM. Patients over 65, women, those residing in the Southern USA, those living further from their facilities and uninsured patients are less likely to receive radiation than their counterparts.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Humanos , Meningioma/cirugía , Meningioma/radioterapia , Masculino , Radioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Meníngeas/cirugía , Neoplasias Meníngeas/radioterapia , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Adulto , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
Importance: The association of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with survival in the general population of patients with resected biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains controversial. As such, the role of this treatment in the treatment of older adult patients (aged ≥70 years) needs to be evaluated. Objective: To describe the patterns of use of AC and compare survival outcomes of AC and observation in older adult patients following resection of BTC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included 8091 older adult patients with resected BTC with data available in the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2019. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: AC and observation. The AC cohort was subdivided into single-agent and multiagent AC treatment. Exposures: Adjuvant chemotherapy vs observation following BTC resection. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) of patients who received AC compared with observation following resection of BTC as evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Inverse probability of treatment weighting and propensity score matching were performed to address indication bias. Results: Between 2004 and 2019, of 8091 older adult patients with resected BTC identified (median [range] age, 77 [70-90] years; 5136 women [63.5%]; 2955 men [36.5%]), only one-third (2632 [32.5%]) received AC. There was an increase in the use of AC across the study period from 20.7% (n = 495) in 2004 to 2009 to 41.2% (n = 856) in 2016 to 2019. Age 80 years or older (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.25-0.33; P < .001) and gallbladder primary site (odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.83; P < .001) were associated with a lower odds of AC. Following inverse probability of treatment weighting, as a composite, AC was not associated with improved survival (median OS, 20.5 months; 95% CI, 19.2-21.7 months) compared with observation (median OS, 19.0 months; 95% CI, 18.1-20.3 months). A longer median OS was associated with single-agent AC (21.5 months; 95% CI, 19.9-24.0 months) but not multiagent AC (19.1 months; 95% CI, 17.5-21.1 months) compared with observation (median OS, 17.3 months; 95% CI, 16.1-18.4 months). This improvement in OS with single-agent AC was not apparent on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.89-1.05; P = .44). However, age at diagnosis of 80 years or older (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.28-1.42; P < .001) and treatment at nonacademic centers (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20, P < .001) were associated with worse OS. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of older adult patients, AC was not associated with an improvement in survival compared with observation following BTC resection. These findings suggest the need for further study of AC for older adult patients who may benefit after curative intent surgery for BTC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Sistema Biliar/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Puntaje de PropensiónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder is a prevalent and life-threatening illness in modern society. The susceptibility to major depressive disorder is profoundly influenced by environmental factors, such as stressful lifestyle or traumatic events, which could impose maladaptive transcriptional program through epigenetic regulation. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain elusive. Here, we examined the role of histone crotonylation, a novel type of histone modification, and chromodomain Y-like protein (CDYL), a crotonyl-coenzyme A hydratase and histone methyllysine reader, in this process. METHODS: We used chronic social defeat stress and microdefeat stress to examine the depressive behaviors. In addition, we combined procedures that diagnose behavioral strategy in male mice with histone extraction, viral-mediated CDYL manipulations, RNA sequencing, chromatin immunoprecipitation, Western blot, and messenger RNA quantification. RESULTS: The results indicate that stress-susceptible rodents exhibit lower levels of histone crotonylation in the medial prefrontal cortex concurrent with selective upregulation of CDYL. Overexpression of CDYL in the prelimbic cortex, a subregion of the medial prefrontal cortex, increases microdefeat-induced social avoidance behaviors and anhedonia in mice. Conversely, knockdown of CDYL in the prelimbic cortex prevents chronic social defeat stress-induced depression-like behaviors. Mechanistically, we show that CDYL inhibits structural synaptic plasticity mainly by transcriptional repression of neuropeptide VGF nerve growth factor inducible, and this activity is dependent on its dual effect on histone crotonylation and H3K27 trimethylation on the VGF promoter. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that CDYL-mediated histone crotonylation plays a critical role in regulating stress-induced depression, providing a potential therapeutic target for major depressive disorder.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas Co-Represoras/metabolismo , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/metabolismo , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Histonas/metabolismo , Hidroliasas/metabolismo , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Acil-CoA Deshidrogenasas/metabolismo , Acilación , Adenoviridae/genética , Animales , Proteínas Co-Represoras/biosíntesis , Proteínas Co-Represoras/genética , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/complicaciones , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/prevención & control , Epigénesis Genética , Técnicas de Silenciamiento del Gen , Vectores Genéticos , Hidroliasas/biosíntesis , Hidroliasas/genética , Masculino , Metilación , Ratones , Factores de Crecimiento Nervioso/biosíntesis , Plasticidad Neuronal , Corteza Prefrontal/metabolismo , Ratas , Estrés Psicológico/complicaciones , Estrés Psicológico/metabolismo , Regulación hacia ArribaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Effective communication and education formats between health care providers and patients about medication use are associated with patients' satisfaction, recall of information, and eventually their health status. Limited research exists on physician-delivered education interventions, as well as on whether the current content of medication education and delivery formats satisfies the needs of both patients and physicians. Our objective was to identify the practice gaps regarding medication education content and delivery. METHODS: Separate surveys were obtained from ambulatory care patients presenting to the outpatient pharmacy for medication pickups, and physicians working at the hospital clinics. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients completed the patient survey, and 116 hospital clinic physicians completed the physician survey. Female patients had a higher degree of concern regarding medication information compared with male patients (4.04±0.65 versus 3.58±0.66, P=0.001). Physicians were less likely to educate patients regarding their medications' on drug-drug interactions (24.3%), drug-food interactions (24.3%), and what to do about their prescriptions if an adverse reaction is experienced (24.3%) during physician-patient encounters. Patients' most desired education format was physician counseling (82.4%) and the second most desired education format was pharmacist counseling (50.9%). Medication device demonstration (7.0%) was the least used educational format delivered to patients by physicians, and patients would like to see an increased education delivery format through medication device demonstration (Method desired [MD] - Method received [MR] =12.0%). Patients would like to see expanded roles of patient focused handout (MD-MR=22.2%), telephone consultation (21.2%), pharmacist counseling (12.9%), the use of medication database embedded within the hospital information system (12.2%) and device demonstration (12.0%). CONCLUSION: This study illustrates that there are practice gaps in current medication education both in terms of content and delivery format. The study provided valuable information in designing and implementing future education activities that are drivers of good medication use and adherence.