Client-therapist temporal congruence in perceiving immediate therapist self-disclosure and its association with treatment outcome.

Objective: Immediate therapist self-disclosure (Im-TSD) can be a powerful intervention. When engaged in judiciously, it can provide clients with a unique opportunity to explore their interpersonal relationship in real time. Relational theories suggest that for Im-TSD to be effective, both client and therapist must have temporally congruent perceptions of its occurrence. The present study examined (a) whether clients and therapists are temporally congruent in their session-by-session ratings of Im-TSD; and (b) whether this congruence is associated with therapy outcomes. Method: After each session, clients (n = 102) and therapists (n = 60) at a university-based clinic indicated whether Im-TSD was present during the session. Before each session, clients self-reported their functioning. They rated session quality after each session. Results: Therapists' ratings of their Im-TSD tended to be temporally congruent with their clients' Im-TSD ratings. Greater temporal congruvdence was associated with greater improvement over time in clients' experience of the session as helpful, but not with changes in clients' functioning. Conclusion: The findings highlight the importance of establishing a stronger temporal congruence of Im-TSD ratings between therapists and clients to further improve clients' experiences in treatment. The findings' implications are discussed as well as situations in which temporal congruence may not be beneficial.

Client-therapist congruence in session-helpfulness ratings and its association with therapy outcomes.

Objective: The present study aimed to explore client-therapist congruence in helpfulness evaluations session-by-session and its association with therapy outcomes. As suggested by West and Kenny's truth and bias model, we constructed congruence as both temporal congruence (i.e., the correlation between therapists' and clients' helpfulness judgments over time) and directional discrepancy (i.e., the average difference between therapists' and clients' helpfulness judgments).Method: Seventy-eight clients were treated by 22 experienced therapists within a 12-session course of integrative psychotherapy. At the end of each session, clients and therapists rated their perceptions of session helpfulness and, at the beginning of the next session, clients rated their own psychological functioning.Results: Therapists' and clients' helpfulness judgments were temporally congruent across treatment, and therapists' judgments were lower than those of their clients. Moreover, we found that therapists' negative directional discrepancy, but not temporal congruence, was associated with improvement in clients' psychological functioning as well as with clients' global treatment evaluations.Conclusion: Our results highlight the importance of therapists' vigilant assessment of session helpfulness in a course of brief integrative psychotherapy. As such, they strengthen the importance of further research regarding client-therapist congruence (in different aspects of the therapeutic process) and its association with therapy outcomes.Clinical or methodological significance of this article In this study, we found that therapists' tendency to provide lower session-helpfulness assessments than did their clients was associated with better therapeutic outcomes. These results may highlight the importance of therapists' cautious and humble stance when assessing their perception of session helpfulness across treatment.

When to disclose and to whom? examining within- and between-client moderators of therapist self disclosure-outcome associations in psychodynamic psychotherapy.

Objective: While previous studies have indicated that therapists' self-disclosure (TSD) can have curative effects, the contextual variables that may moderate the link between TSD and treatment outcome have not been sufficiently explored. Using session-by-session psychotherapy data, we examined the extent to which within-client distress and between-clients emotion regulation difficulties moderated the associations between TSD and session outcomes.Method: The sample comprised 68 clients treated according to the principles of psychodynamic psychotherapy by 47 therapists in a university clinic. Emotion regulation difficulties were assessed at the beginning of treatment, and functioning and distress levels as well as symptoms were assessed at the beginning of each session. After each session, therapists completed a measure of frequency and centrality of their immediate and non- immediate self-disclosure interventions during the session.Results: At the within-client level, in sessions marked by high pre-session client distress, immediate TSD was associated with a better next session outcome. At the between-clients level, for clients who had low emotion regulation difficulties, immediate TSD was marginally associated with better outcomes.Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of considering within-client level as well as between-clients level variables when deciding upon self-disclosure.

Using termination as an intervention (UTAI): A view from an integrative, cognitive-existential psychodynamics perspective.

Treatment termination is, arguably, one of the most important events in the course of psychotherapy. In the present article, we present an approach to termination that views the latter as a key intervention. Developed from an integrated, cognitive-existential psychodynamics (CEP) perspective (Shahar & Govrin, 2017), Using Termination as an Intervention (UTAI) is a prescheduled, albeit tentative, treatment termination that may be used as an intervention for patients' remoralization (Howard, Kopta, Krause, & Orlinsky, 1986). Specifically, for some psychotherapy patients, prescheduling a treatment termination is useful in instilling a sense of responsibility and agency and in deepening a therapeutic examination of patients' interpersonal schemas and scripts (i.e., "object relations"). The integrative nature of Using Termination as an Intervention is delineated, and caveats are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Therapeutic technique diversity is linked to quality of working alliance and client functioning following alliance ruptures.

OBJECTIVE: The current investigation aimed to examine the possible association between therapists' flexibility in use of therapeutic techniques from different therapy orientations (i.e., therapeutic technique diversity; TTD) and subsequent improvement in client-reported (a) global functioning, as well as (b) quality of the working alliance, following sessions in which alliance ruptures occurred. METHOD: Clients (n = 81) who received time-limited psychodynamic therapy in a community clinic, completed session-by-session reports of working alliance and global functioning. Therapists (n = 56) completed session-by-session reports of working alliance and their use of therapeutic techniques across different therapeutic orientations, using the Multitheoretical List of Interventions (MULTI-30). RESULTS: We found a curvilinear association between TTD in rupture sessions and client-reported global functioning at the sessions subsequent to rupture sessions, such that moderate levels of TTD were associated with greater subsequent improvement in functioning, compared with low and high levels of TTD. However, TTD was not significantly associated with subsequent changes in the quality of working alliance. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that moderate levels of TTD in the face of alliance ruptures are tied to clients' global functioning improvement during psychodynamic psychotherapy. These findings highlight the importance of further investigation of a varied delivery of therapeutic techniques, especially in the face of alliance ruptures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Immediate therapist self-disclosure bolsters the effect of brief integrative psychotherapy on psychiatric symptoms and the perceptions of therapists: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: We report a first randomized clinical trial examining the effect of immediate and non-immediate therapist self-disclosure in the context of a brief integrative psychotherapy for mild to moderate distress. METHOD: A total of 86 patients with mild to moderate forms of distress were randomly divided into three 12-session integrative psychotherapy conditions based primarily on [Hill, C. E. (2009). Helping skills: Facilitating, exploration, insight, and action (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.] three-stage model. Therapists trained in this treatment modality were instructed to use either immediate self-disclosure (expressing feelings towards the patient/treatment/therapeutic relationship) or non-immediate self-disclosure (expressing personal or factual information regarding the therapist's life outside the treatment). In the comparison condition, the therapists were instructed to refrain from self-disclosure altogether. RESULTS: Immediate therapist self-disclosure reduced psychiatric symptoms among patients with elevated pretreatment symptoms (as assessed by the Brief Symptoms Inventory) and bolstered a favorable perception of the therapist. Therapists in both the immediate and non-immediate self-disclosure group evaluated themselves more favorably than their counterparts in the non-disclosure group. CONCLUSIONS: Therapist self-disclosure, particularly of the immediate type, might enhance the effect of brief integrative treatment on psychiatric symptoms of high symptomatic patients and contribute to favorable perception of therapists.

Therapeutic self-disclosure in integrative psychotherapy: When is this a clinical error?

Ascending to prominence in virtually all forms of psychotherapy, therapist self-disclosure (TSD) has recently been identified as a primarily integrative intervention (Ziv-Beiman, 2013). In the present article, we discuss various instances in which using TSD in integrative psychotherapy might constitute a clinical error. First, we briefly review extant theory and empirical research on TSD, followed by our preferred version of integrative psychotherapy (i.e., a version of Wachtel's Cyclical Psychodynamics [Wachtel, 1977, 1997, 2014]), which we title cognitive existential psychodynamics. Next, we provide and discuss three examples in which implementing TSD constitutes a clinical error. In essence, we submit that using TSD constitutes an error when patients, constrained by their representational structures (object relations), experience the subjectivity of the other as impinging, and thus propels them to "react" instead of "emerge." (PsycINFO Database Record