Utilization of 3D mapping systems in interventional electrophysiology and its impact on procedure time and fluoroscopy-Insights from the "Go for Zero Fluoroscopy" project.

AIM: The implementation of 3D mapping systems plays an important role in interventional electrophysiology (EP) in recent years. The aim of the present study was to evaluate use of 3D mapping systems regarding fluoroscopy and procedure duration. METHOD: In the "Go for Zero Fluoroscopy" project 25 European centers provided data of consecutive EP procedures. Data on use of 3D mapping systems as well as utilization of contact force catheters and multipolar mapping catheters were associated with fluoroscopy time, dose area product (DAP), and procedure duration. RESULT: A 3D mapping system was used in 966 (54%) cases. Use of 3D mapping for atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) was associated with reduced fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001), DAP (p = 0.04) but increased procedure time (p = 0.029). Moreover, fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001) and DAP (p = 0.005) were significantly lower in the 3D mapping group in ablation of typical atrial flutter. However, the procedure time (p < 0.001) increased. Use of 3D mapping in the ablation of accessory pathway (AP) was associated with reduced fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001) and DAP (p < 0.001) with no significant increase in procedure time (p = 0.066). In the case of atrial fibrillation, a 3D mapping system was used in 485 patients (75.8%). Additional use of a contact force catheter was associated with lower fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001) and DAP (p < 0.001). Use of a multipolar mapping catheter was associated with lower fluoroscopy time (p = 0.002). The implementation of 3D mapping systems in the ablation of ventricular tachycardias resulted in a significant increase in the procedure time (p = 0.001) without significant differences regarding the DAP (p = 0.773) and fluoroscopy time (p = 0.249). CONCLUSION: Use of 3D mapping systems in ablation of supraventricular tachycardias is associated with lower radiation exposure. Nevertheless, the procedure time often increases, except in the case of ablation for AP. Use of contact force catheters and multipolar mapping catheters is associated with yet lower radiation exposure values. Prospective randomized studies are needed to further elucidate potential benefit of these technological tools.

Changes in eligibility for a subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillator after implantation of a left ventricular assist device-A prospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: The number of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) implanted in patients with end-stage heart failure is increasing. In this patient cohort, subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) could be a promising alternative to transvenous ICDs due to lower infection rates and avoidance of venous access. However, eligibility for the S-ICD depends on ECG features that may be influenced by an LVAD. The aim of the present study was a prospective evaluation of S-ICD eligibility before and after LVAD implantation. METHODS: The study recruited all patients presenting at Hannover Medical School for LVAD implantation between 2016 and 2020. S-ICD eligibility was evaluated using the ECG-based and the device-based S-ICD screening test before and after LVAD implantation. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (57.3 ± 8.7 years of age, 95.5% male) were included in the analysis. The most common underlying diseases were dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 16, 72.7%) and ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 5, 22.7%). Before LVAD implantation 16 patients were found eligible for the S-ICD according to both screening tests (72.7%), but only 7 patients were eligible after LVAD, 31.8%; p = 0.05). Oversensing due to electromagnetic interference was observed in 6 patients (66.6%) found ineligible for S-ICD after LVAD implantation. A lower S wave amplitude in leads I (p = 0.009), II (p = 0.006) and aVF (p = 0.006) before LVAD implantation was associated with higher rate of S-ICD ineligibility after LVAD implantation. CONCLUSION: LVAD implantation can impair S-ICD eligibility. Patients with lower S wave amplitude in leads I, II and aVF were more likely to be ineligible for S-ICD implantation after LVAD implantation. Thus, S-ICD therapy should be carefully considered in patients who are candidates for LVAD therapy.

Depressive Symptoms and Quality of Life in Patients With Heart Failure and an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is associated with development of depressive symptoms and reduced quality of life (QoL). Patients with HF and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) were evaluated regarding depressive symptoms and QoL. Methods: The present study included 446 patients with HF and an ICD. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), QoL was evaluated using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). Functional ability and exercise tolerance were assessed at inclusion and after 6 months with help of the 6-min walking test (6MWT). Results: Patients included in the study had a mean age of 65.8 years and were predominantly male (83.6%), with mostly ischemic (n = 277; 62.1%) or dilated (n = 150; 33.6%) cardiomyopathy. One hundred ninety-three (43.2%) patients had depressive symptoms, of whom 75 patients (16.8%) were classified as moderate to severe depression according to the PHQ-9 at baseline. Depressive symptoms were associated with low QoL independent of NYHA functional class. High NYHA functional class, high PHQ-9 score, age and body mass index (BMI) were associated with a lower 6MWT at enrollment, while depressive symptoms (expressed as higher PHQ-9 score) and age were associated with a lower 6MWT after 6 months. Patients with history of smoking and a higher BMI showed higher PHQ-9 scores after 6 months. Patients under antidepressant medication showed improved PHQ-9 score after 6 months, indicating controlled/treated depression. However, patients with low QoL at inclusion remained with low QoL after 6 months. Conclusion: Depressive symptoms correlate with low QoL and lower long-term functional status in patients with HF and an ICD. Depressive symptoms are associated with smoking and obesity, which themselves are risk factors for a poor prognosis in HF. Only a small fraction of patients with HF and ICD showing depressive symptoms receives appropriate treatment. Assessing depressive symptoms and lifestyle factors should be part of a multimodal treatment plan in patients with HF and an ICD.

Delayed Improvement of Left Ventricular Function in Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure Depends on Etiology-A PROLONG-II Substudy.

In patients with newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), three months of optimal therapy are recommended before considering a primary preventive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). It is unclear which patients benefit from a prolonged waiting period under protection of the wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) to avoid unnecessary ICD implantations. This study included all patients receiving a WCD for newly diagnosed HFrEF (n = 353) at our center between 2012 and 2017. Median follow-up was 2.7 years. From baseline until three months, LVEF improved in patients with all peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM), myocarditis, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), or ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). Beyond this time, LVEF improved in PPCM and DCM only (10 ± 8% and 10 ± 12%, respectively), whereas patients with ICM showed no further improvement. The patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF were compared to 29 patients with a distinct WCD indication, which is an explantation of an infected ICD. This latter group had a higher incidence of WCD shocks and poorer overall survival. All-cause mortality should be considered when deciding on WCD prescription. In patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF, the potential for delayed LVEF recovery should be considered when timing ICD implantation, especially in patients with PPCM and DCM.

Stereotactic radioablation for ventricular tachycardia.

Non-invasive stereotactic radioablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate has been proposed as a novel treatment modality for patients not eligible for catheter-based ablation or in whom this approach has failed. Initial clinical results are promising with good short-term efficacy in VT suppression and tolerable side effects. This article reviews the current clinical evidence for cardiac radioablation and gives an overview of important preclinical and translational results. Practical guidance is provided, and a cardiac radioablation planning and treatment workflow based on expert consensus and the authors' institutional experience is set out.

Feasibility and First Results of Heart Failure Monitoring Using the Wearable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Newly Diagnosed Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction.

The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is used in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In addition to arrhythmic events, the WCD provides near-continuous telemetric heart failure monitoring. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of additionally recorded parameters, such as heart rate or step count. We included patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF prescribed with a WCD. Via the WCD, step count and heart rate were acquired, and an approximate for heart rate variability (HRV5) was calculated. Multivariate analysis was performed to analyze predictors for an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Two hundred and seventy-six patients (31.9% female) were included. Mean LVEF was 25.3 ± 8.5%. Between the first and last seven days of usage, median heart rate fell significantly (p < 0.001), while median step count and HRV5 significantly increased (p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, a delta of HRV5 > 23 ms was an independent predictor for LVEF improvement of ≥10% between prescription and 3-month follow-up. Patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF showed significant changes in heart rate, step count, and HRV5 between the beginning and end of WCD prescription time. HRV5 was an independent predictor for LVEF improvement and could serve as an early indicator of treatment response.

[The ECG is the key]. / Das EKG ist der Schlüssel.

A 35-year-old man experienced respiratory agony while sleeping followed by a generalized seizure. Subsequent exclusively neurological diagnostics showed no pathological findings. Four months later, the patient suffered a sudden cardiac death due to ventricular fibrillation, which he survived without neurological deficit. After initially unremarkable diagnostics, the diagnosis could be made electrocardiographically. Following a special pharmacological therapy, the patient remained free from further episodes of ventricular fibrillation in the long-term follow-up.

Extended follow-up after wearable cardioverter-defibrillator period: the PROLONG-II study.

AIM: The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is used for temporary protection from sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure with reduced ejection fraction before considering an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). However, the prognostic significance of the WCD remains controversial due to conflicting evidence. The aim of the present study was to evaluate prognosis of patients receiving life-saving WCD shocks. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients receiving a WCD at Hannover Medical School for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction between 2012 and 2017 were included. Data were acquired at baseline, at 3 months and at last available follow-up (FU). Three hundred and fifty-three patients were included (69% male; age 56 ± 15 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 25 ± 8%). FU after the WCD was 2.8 ± 1.5 years with a maximum of 6.8 years. Daily WCD wear time was 22 ± 4 h. Fourteen patients (4%) received appropriate WCD shocks. Two patients (0.6%) died during the WCD period. Thirty patients (9%) died during extended FU. Mean estimated survival after the WCD was similar between patients with and without WCD shocks. Patients without an ICD recommendation after WCD prescription did not experience SCD during FU. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with WCD shocks showed a favourable survival. Patients without an ICD recommendation after WCD prescription had no SCD during FU. These findings support the practice of careful risk stratification before considering an ICD and the use of the WCD for temporary protection from SCD.

A Novel SCN5A Variant Causes Temperature-Sensitive Loss Of Function in a Family with Symptomatic Brugada Syndrome, Cardiac Conduction Disease, and Sick Sinus Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited arrhythmia syndrome associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. SCN5A is the most important disease-modifying gene for BrS, but many SCN5A variants have not been functionally characterized. Furthermore, the temperature dependency of SCN5A is only rarely explored in in vitro analyses. METHODS: The clinical phenotype of the affected family was assessed by medical history, ECGs and ajmaline challenge. Whole-cell patch clamp recordings were performed on HEK 293T cells expressing Nav1.5-G1712S, a novel SCN5A variant found in the symptomatic family. RESULTS: Three male family members had experienced sudden cardiac death, sudden cardiac arrest, and rhythmogenic syncopes. Beside a positive ajmaline challenge with demarcation of a Brugada type 1 ECG, 1 patient also showed evidence of symptomatic cardiac conduction disease and sick sinus syndrome (SSS). In patch clamp analyses, Nav1.5-G1712S generated reduced peak currents as compared to the wild type. At body temperature, Nav1.5-G1712S additionally exhibited an enhanced slow inactivation and an impaired recovery from inactivation. CONCLUSION: We conclude that G1712S is a pathogenic SCN5A loss-of function mutation at physiological temperature associated with an overlapping presentation of BrS, SSS, and cardiac conduction disease.

Eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in adults with congenital heart disease.

AIMS: Patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) carry an increased risk for sudden cardiac death. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy may be challenging in these patients due to anatomical barriers, repeated cardiac surgery, or complicated transvenous access. Thus, the subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) can be a promising alternative in this patient population. Patients with ACHD show significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, which could affect S-ICD sensing because it depends on surface ECG. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients with ACHD were screened for S-ICD eligibility. Standard ECG-based screening test and automated S-ICD screening test were performed in all patients. Sixty-six patients (66%) were male. Underlying congenital heart disease (CHD) was mainly CHD of great complexity (71%) and moderate complexity (29%), including repaired tetralogy of Fallot (20%), which was the most common entity. Thirty-seven patients (37%) already had a pacemaker (23%) or ICD (14%) implanted. Automated screening test identified 83 patients (83%) eligible for S-ICD implantation in either left parasternal position (78%) or right parasternal position (75%). Absence of sinus rhythm, QRS duration, and a paced QRS complex were associated with S-ICD screening failure in univariate analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve and multivariate analysis revealed a QRS duration ≥148 ms as the only independent predictor for S-ICD screening failure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ACHD show satisfactory eligibility rates (83%) for S-ICD implantation utilizing the automated screening test, including patients with CHD of high complexity. S-ICD therapy should be considered with caution in ACHD patients with a QRS duration ≥148 ms and/or need for ventricular pacing.

Eligibility for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with left ventricular assist device.

PURPOSE: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) could be a promising alternative to the conventional transvenous ICD in patients with LVAD due to its reduced risk of infection. However, surface ECG is altered following LVAD implantation and, since S-ICD detection is based on surface ECG, S-ICD could be potentially affected. The aim of the present study was to analyze S-ICD eligibility in patients with LVAD. METHODS: Seventy-five patients implanted with an LVAD were included in this prospective single-center study. The ECG-based screening test and the automated screening test were performed in all patients. RESULTS: Fifty-five (73.3%) patients had either a positive ECG-based or automated screening test. Out of these, 28 (37.3%) patients were found eligible for S-ICD implantation with both screening tests performed. ECG-based screening test was positive in 50 (66.6%) patients; automated screening test was positive in 33 (44.0%) patients. Three ECG-based screening tests could not be evaluated due to artifacts. With the automated screening test, in 9 (12.0%) patients, the test yielded no result. CONCLUSIONS: Patients implanted with an LVAD showed lower S-ICD eligibility rates compared with patients without LVAD. With an S-ICD eligibility rate of maximal 73.3%, S-ICD therapy may be a feasible option in these patients. Nevertheless, S-ICD implantation should be carefully weighed against potential device-device interference. Prospective studies regarding S-ICD eligibility before and after LVAD implantation are required to further elucidate the role of S-ICD therapy in this population.

A novel screening tool to unmask potential interference between S-ICD and left ventricular assist device.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) can be an alternative to transvenous ICD systems due to reduced risk of systemic infection, which could lead to extraction of the ICD as well as the LVAD. S-ICD eligibility is lower in patients with LVAD than in patients with end-stage heart failure without LVAD. Several reports have shown inappropriate S-ICD therapy in the coexistence of LVAD and S-ICD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate S-ICD eligibility in patients with LVAD using the established electrocardiogram (ECG)-based screening test as well as a novel device-based screening test to identify potentially inappropriate S-ICD sensing in this specific patient cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present study included 115 patients implanted with an LVAD. The standard ECG-based screening test and a novel device-based screening test were performed in all patients. Eighty patients (70%) were eligible for S-ICD therapy with the standard ECG-based screening test. Performance of the novel device-based screening test identified device-device interference in 14 of these 80 patients (12%). CONCLUSION: Using a novel extended device-based S-ICD screening method, a small number of patients with LVAD deemed eligible for S-ICD with the standard ECG-based screening test exhibit device-device interference. Careful S-ICD screening should be performed in patients with LVAD, who are candidates for S-ICD therapy, to prevent inappropriate sensing or ICD therapy.

[It's all over! : Complications in the EP lab and their solutions]. / Jetzt ist alles aus! : Komplikationen im EPU-Labor und ihre Lösungen.

In cardiac electrophysiology, invasive procedures like catheter ablations or device implantations are getting increasingly complex. This poses challenges especially for electrophysiologists in training, not only to learn how to perform the procedure, but also how to manage possible complications. The present article uses exemplary case studies to present how to control complications and how to avoid them. The presented cases deal with complications such as air embolism in left atrial procedures, iatrogenic vascular injuries such as aortic dissection or dissection of the coronary sinus, complications and challenges with lead revisions, and pericardial tamponade. In each case, measures for avoidance as well as practical guidance for management are shown when the respective complication occurs.

A novel open-source software-based high-precision workflow for target definition in cardiac radioablation.

INTRODUCTION: Noninvasive ablative radiotherapy of cardiac arrhythmias (stereotactic ablative body radiation) has shown promising initial results. Precise targeting of the arrhythmogenic substrate is paramount to limit adverse effects to healthy myocardium, organs at risk, and cardiac implantable electronic devices. Using electroanatomic maps for treatment planning is technically challenging. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the free open-source 3D Slicer software platform we established a workflow for high-precision target definition based on electroanatomic maps. An import plug-in for 3D Slicer has been designed that reads electroanatomic maps generated with three mapping systems in widespread clinical use. Using our proposed workflow in a real-world patient case we were able to align the map to the computed tomography (CT) with a mean distance of 3.1 mm. Thus, points defined on the map were translated into CT space with high accuracy and a radiotherapy treatment volume was defined in CT space based on these map-derived points. CONCLUSION: We describe a novel high-precision target definition method for stereotactic ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Multimodal integration of the electroanatomic map with the planning CT allows for highly accurate localization of previously identified electrophysiological features in CT space. It remains to be shown whether this novel planning workflow leads to superior ablation outcomes when compared with other approaches.

When two hearts do not beat as one - An unusual cause of pacemaker related tachycardia.

We describe an unusual cause of intermittent rapid ventricular paced rhythm in a patient implanted with a dual chamber pacemaker due to sinus node dysfunction after heart transplantation. During implantation of the pacemaker lead measurements were reported normal, atrial sensing was not documented because of sinus arrest. After implantation the patient complained about intermittent palpitations. Via pacemaker interrogation we could demonstrate electrical isolation of the atrial lead, which was implanted in the donor's atrial myocardium. This led to intermittent pacemaker related tachycardia and AV-dissociation. This case report highlights the difficulty of atrial lead placement in heart transplanted patients using the biatrial surgical technique.

Electrocardiographic changes after implantation of a left ventricular assist device - Potential implications for subcutaneous defibrillator therapy.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) leads to a diverse spectrum of changes on the twelve-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG). We aimed to elucidate the changes of the surface ECG in patients after LVAD implantation potentially impacting ECG based screening tests of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD). METHODS: Patients from 2005 until 2017 with a documented twelve-lead ECG before and after LVAD implantation were included. Baseline parameters were obtained through hospital records. The twelve-lead ECGs registered before and after LVAD implantation were analyzed. RESULTS: From 415 patients undergoing an LVAD implantation, complete datasets were available for 253 patients. 216 patients (85%) were male. Mean age at time of LVAD implantation was 54.7 ±â€¯12.4 years. The underlying etiology was ischemic cardiomyopathy in 119 (47%), dilated cardiomyopathy in 112 (44%), myocarditis in 8 (3%) and other in 14 (6%). We observed a reduction in the amplitude of the R wave in lead I (p < 0.0001), lead II (p < 0.0001), lead III (p < 0.004), lead aVL (p < 0.001) and lead aVF (p < 0.0001) as well as of the S wave in lead III (p < 0.001) and lead aVR (p < 0.0001) after LVAD implantation. We also noticed a reduction of the R:T ratio in lead I (p < 0.0001) as well as in lead II (p = 0.100) and lead aVF (p = 0.292) although statistically non-significant. CONCLUSION: LVAD implantation leads to significant alterations of the surface ECG, especially the R:T ratio in leads I, II and aVF. These leads correlate with the vectors of the ECG based S-ICD screening test. Thus, these ECG changes may impact the continuous eligibility for subcutaneous ICD therapy in patients after LVAD implantation.

[Syncopes and channelopathies]. / Synkopen und Ionenkanalerkrankungen.

Syncope can be the first manifestation of cardiac channelopathies, namely Brugada syndrome, long QT syndrome, short QT syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). Patients affected by these rare diseases are at increased risk for sudden cardiac death due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias and require specific therapy and follow-up. As syncope is common in the general population, only few cases are caused by an underlying channelopathy. Nevertheless, the diagnosis should be considered in young patients with structurally normal hearts, especially if the history of syncope is typical for an arrhythmogenic cause, in the presence of characteristic echocardiogram (ECG) patterns, and if there is a family history of channelopathies or sudden cardiac death. On the other hand, syncope plays an important role in the management of patients with diagnosed channelopathies, as they may indicate an increased risk for sudden cardiac death. The predictive value and consequences for treatment vary between the different channelopathies. However, data on this issue are scarce due to the low prevalence of these diseases. This review highlights typical findings in the medical history and diagnostic tests that may point towards an underlying channelopathy in patients with syncope. It also discusses the prognostic and therapeutic implications of a history of syncope in patients with known channelopathies.