Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vet Parasitol ; 284: 109199, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32801106

RESUMEN

Fecal egg counts are the cornerstone of equine parasite control programs. Previous work led to the development of an automated, image-analysis-based parasite egg counting system. The system has been further developed to include an automated reagent dispenser unit and a custom camera (CC) unit that generates higher resolution images, as well as a particle shape analysis (PSA) algorithm and machine learning (ML) algorithm. The first aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive comparison of method precision between the original smartphone (SP) unit with the PSA algorithm, CC/PSA, CC/ML, and the traditional McMaster (MM) and Wisconsin (MW) manual techniques. Additionally, a Bayesian analysis was performed to estimate and compare sensitivity and specificity of all five methods. Feces were collected from horses, screened with triplicate Mini-FLOTAC counts, and placed into five categories: negative (no eggs seen), > 0 - ≤ 200 eggs per gram (EPG), > 200 - ≤ 500 EPG, > 500 - ≤ 1000 EPG, and > 1000 EPG. Ten replicates per horse were analyzed for each technique. Technical variability for samples > 200 EPG was significantly higher for MM than CC/PSA and CC/ML (p <  0.0001). Biological variability for samples> 0 was numerically highest for CC/PSA, but with samples > 200 EPG, MM had a significantly lower CV than MW (p =  0.001), MW had a significantly lower CV than CC/PSA (p <  0.0001), CC/ML had a significantly lower CV than both MW and SP/PSA (p <  0.0001, p =  0.0003), and CC/PSA had a significantly lower CV than CC/SP (p =  0.0115). Sensitivity was> 98 % for all five methods with no significant differences. Specificity, however, was significantly the highest for CC/PSA, followed numerically by SP/PSA, MM, CC/ML, and finally MW. Overall, the automated counting system is a promising new development in equine parasitology. Continued refinement to the counting algorithms will help improve precision and specificity, while additional research in areas such as egg loss, analyst variability at the counting step, and accuracy will help create a complete picture of its impact as a new fecal egg count method.


Asunto(s)
Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/veterinaria , Infecciones Equinas por Strongyloidea/diagnóstico , Infecciones Equinas por Strongyloidea/parasitología , Animales , Heces/parasitología , Caballos , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/instrumentación , Recuento de Huevos de Parásitos/normas , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Teléfono Inteligente
2.
Vet Parasitol ; 273: 86-89, 2019 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31449972

RESUMEN

Cyathostomins are pervasive equine parasites in horses across the world, and larval stages are known to cause the deadly disease larval cyathostominosis. The mucosal digestion technique is widely used for enumeration of encysted larval stages. Previous studies have investigated the spatial variation of encysted larvae, however current protocols lack a description of a standardized area from which to take the tissue sample. This study sought to evaluate spatial variation in encysted cyathostomin larval counts among the large intestinal organs and their subsections. Following humane euthanasia, ceca, ventral, and dorsal colons were harvested from 8 foals (aged 4-8 months) raised in an anthelmintic naïve parasitology research herd. Each organ was weighed and separated into 3 equal sections by length: the orad, intermediate, and aborad portions. From each of those sections, two 5% weight tissue samples were collected and digested to quantify the early third stage larvae (EL3) and late third stage larvae/fourth stage larvae (LL3/L4). A mixed model statistical analysis was carried out to evaluate for differences of larval counts among the different organs, sections, and the interaction term between the organs and sections. There were significant differences among organs (P < 0.0001), with the ceca having higher counts than the ventral and dorsal colons. However, there were no significant differences among the three defined organ sections (P = 0.1076). Coefficients of variation (CV) were all calculated to be greater than 1, suggesting a high level of variability among the samples; the least amount of variation can be found in the cecal data with a CV of 1.4024 compared with the ventral colon's 1.529845 and dorsal colon's 3.339135 within the respective organ. The following sections had the highest mean counts of encysted larvae: intermediate cecum, orad ventral colon, and aborad dorsal colon. Though only a portion of the results were significant, trends were observed and these should be investigated further in future studies and potentially employed in larvicidal efficacy evaluations.


Asunto(s)
Intestino Grueso/parasitología , Infecciones Equinas por Strongyloidea/parasitología , Animales , Caballos , Larva , Membrana Mucosa/parasitología , Carga de Parásitos , Strongyloidea
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA