Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Eur Urol Open Sci ; 50: 70-77, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37101774

RESUMEN

Background: Culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis is a plausible strategy to reduce infections after transrectal prostate biopsy (PB) related to fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens. Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of rectal culture-based prophylaxis compared with empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. Design setting and participants: The study was performed alongside a trial in 11 Dutch hospitals investigating the effectiveness of culture-based prophylaxis in transrectal PB between April 2018 and July 2021 (trial registration number: NCT03228108). Intervention: Patients were 1:1 randomized for empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (oral) or culture-based prophylaxis. Costs for both prophylactic strategies were determined for two scenarios: (1) all infectious complications within 7 d after biopsy and (2) culture-proven Gram-negative infections within 30 d after biopsy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Differences in costs and effects (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) were analyzed from a healthcare and societal perspective (including productivity losses, and travel and parking costs) using a bootstrap procedure presenting uncertainty surrounding the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in a cost-effectiveness plane and acceptability curve. Results and limitations: For the 7-d follow-up period, culture-based prophylaxis (n = 636) was €51.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.52-96.63) more expensive from a healthcare perspective and €16.95 (95% CI -54.29 to 88.18) from a societal perspective than empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (n = 652). Ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria were detected in 15.4%. Extrapolating our data, from a healthcare perspective, 40% ciprofloxacin resistance would lead to equal cost for both strategies. Results were similar for the 30-d follow-up period. No significant differences in QALYs were observed. Conclusions: Our results should be interpreted in the context of local ciprofloxacin resistance rates. In our setting, from a healthcare perspective, culture-based prophylaxis was significantly more expensive than empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. From a societal perspective, culture-based prophylaxis was somewhat more cost effective against the threshold value customary for the Netherlands (€80.000). Patient summary: Culture-based prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy was not associated with reduced costs compared with empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis.

2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(7): 1188-1196, 2023 04 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36419331

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An increase in infections after transrectal prostate biopsy (PB), related to an increasing number of patients with ciprofloxacin-resistant rectal flora, necessitates the exploration of alternatives for the traditionally used empirical prophylaxis of ciprofloxacin. We compared infectious complication rates after transrectal PB using empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis versus culture-based prophylaxis. METHODS: In this nonblinded, randomized trial, between 4 April 2018 and 30 July 2021, we enrolled 1538 patients from 11 Dutch hospitals undergoing transrectal PB. After rectal swab collection, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive empirical prophylaxis with oral ciprofloxacin (control group [CG]) or culture-based prophylaxis (intervention group [IG]). Primary outcome was any infectious complication within 7 days after biopsy. Secondary outcomes were infectious complications within 30 days, and bacteremia and bacteriuria within 7 and 30 days postbiopsy. For primary outcome analysis, the χ2 test stratified for hospitals was used. Trial registration number: NCT03228108. RESULTS: Data from 1288 patients (83.7%) were available for analysis (CG, 652; IG, 636). Infection rates within 7 days postbiopsy were 4.3% (n = 28) (CG) and 2.5% (n = 16) (IG) (P value = .08; reduction: -1.8%; 95% confidence interval, -.004 to .040). Ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria were detected in 15.2% (n = 1288). In the CG, the presence of ciprofloxacin-resistant rectal flora resulted in a 6.2-fold higher risk of early postbiopsy infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the use of culture-based prophylaxis to reduce infectious complications after transrectal PB. Despite adequate prophylaxis, postbiopsy infections can still occur. Therefore, culture-based prophylaxis must be weighed against other strategies that could reduce postbiopsy infections. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03228108.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Recto/microbiología , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos
3.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 19(10): 1069-1079, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31451419

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Use of single-bed rooms for control of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae is under debate; the added value when applying contact precautions has not been shown. We aimed to assess whether an isolation strategy of contact precautions in a multiple-bed room was non-inferior to a strategy of contact precautions in a single-bed room for preventing transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. METHODS: We did a cluster-randomised, crossover, non-inferiority study on medical and surgical wards of 16 Dutch hospitals. During two consecutive study periods, either contact precautions in a single-bed room or contact precautions in a multiple-bed room were applied as the preferred isolation strategy for patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae cultured from a routine clinical sample (index patients). Eligible index patients were aged 18 years or older, had no strict indication for barrier precautions in a single-bed room, had a culture result reported within 7 days of culture and before discharge, and had no wardmate known to be colonised or infected with an ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolate of the same bacterial species with a similar antibiogram. Hospitals were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio by computer to one of two sequences of isolation strategies, stratified by university or non-university hospital. Allocation was masked for laboratory technicians who assessed the outcomes but not for patients, treating doctors, and infection-control practitioners enrolling index patients. The primary outcome was transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae to wardmates, which was defined as rectal carriage of an ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolate that was clonally related to the index patient's isolate in at least one wardmate. The primary analysis was done in the per-protocol population, which included patients who were adherent to the assigned room type. A 10% non-inferiority margin for the risk difference was used to assess non-inferiority. This study is registered with Nederlands Trialregister, NTR2799. FINDINGS: 16 hospitals were randomised, eight to each sequence of isolation strategies. All hospitals randomised to the sequence single-bed room then multiple-bed room and five of eight hospitals randomised to the sequence multiple-bed room then single-bed room completed both study periods and were analysed. From April 24, 2011, to Feb 27, 2014, 1652 index patients and 12 875 wardmates were assessed for eligibility. Of those, 693 index patients and 9527 wardmates were enrolled and 463 index patients and 7093 wardmates were included in the per-protocol population. Transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae to at least one wardmate was identified for 11 (4%) of 275 index patients during the single-bed room strategy period and for 14 (7%) of 188 index patients during the multiple-bed room strategy period (crude risk difference 3·4%, 90% CI -0·3 to 7·1). INTERPRETATION: For patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae cultured from a routine clinical sample, an isolation strategy of contact precautions in a multiple-bed room was non-inferior to a strategy of contact precautions in a single-bed room for preventing transmission of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Non-inferiority of the multiple-bed room strategy might change the current single-bed room preference for isolation of patients with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and, thus, broaden infection-control options for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in daily clinical practice. FUNDING: Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/transmisión , Enterobacteriaceae/metabolismo , Hospitales Universitarios , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Aislamiento de Pacientes/métodos , Habitaciones de Pacientes , beta-Lactamasas , Anciano , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Estudios Cruzados , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Distribución Aleatoria
4.
Mycoses ; 59(2): 101-7, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26648179

RESUMEN

A survey of diagnosis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis was conducted in eight University Medical Centers (UMCs) and eight non-academic teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Against a background of emerging azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus routine resistance screening of clinical isolates was performed primarily in the UMCs. Azole resistance rates at the hospital level varied between 5% and 10%, although rates up to 30% were reported in high-risk wards. Voriconazole remained first choice for invasive aspergillosis in 13 out of 16 hospitals. In documented azole resistance 14 out of 16 centres treated patients with liposomal amphotericin B.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico , Aspergilosis/diagnóstico , Aspergilosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Aspergillus fumigatus/efectos de los fármacos , Voriconazol/uso terapéutico , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Aspergilosis/epidemiología , Aspergillus fumigatus/aislamiento & purificación , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Voriconazol/farmacología
5.
PLoS One ; 7(10): e47707, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23082197

RESUMEN

We determined the prevalence and spread of antibiotic resistance and the characteristics of ESBL producing and/or multi drug resistant (MDR) Escherichia coli isolates collected from urine samples from urology services in the Euregio Meuse-Rhine, the border region of the Netherlands (n=176), Belgium (n=126) and Germany (n=119). Significant differences in resistance between the three regions were observed. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid resistance ranged from 24% in the Netherlands to 39% in Belgium (p=0.018), from 20% to 40% (p<0.004) for the fluoroquinolones and from 20% to 40% (p=0.018) for the folate antagonists. Resistance to nitrofurantoin was less than 5%. The prevalence of ESBL producing isolates varied from 2% among the Dutch isolates to 8% among the German ones (p=0.012) and were mainly CTX-M 15. The prevalence of MDR isolates among the Dutch, German and Belgian isolates was 11%, 17% and 27%, respectively (p< =0.001 for the Belgian compared with the Dutch isolates). The majority of the MDR and ESBL producing isolates belonged to ST131. This study indicates that most antibiotics used as first choice oral empiric treatment for UTIs (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, fluoroquinolones and folate antagonists) are not appropriate for this purpose and that MDR strains such as CTX-M producing ST131 have spread in the entire Euregion. Our data stress the importance of ward specific surveillance to optimize empiric treatment. Also, prudent use of antibiotics and further research to alternative agents are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/aislamiento & purificación , Manejo de Especímenes , Urología , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Bélgica/epidemiología , Escherichia coli/clasificación , Escherichia coli/enzimología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/microbiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Países Bajos/epidemiología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismo
6.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 66(10): 2418-24, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21719471

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Using data from an observational study in which the effectiveness of a guideline for eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage was evaluated, we identified variables that were associated with treatment failure. METHODS: A multivariate logistic regression model was performed with subgroup analyses for uncomplicated and complicated MRSA carriage (the latter including MRSA infection, skin lesions, foreign-body material, mupirocin resistance and/or exclusive extranasal carriage) and for those treated according to the guideline (i.e. mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine soap solution for uncomplicated carriage, in combination with two oral antibiotics for complicated carriage). RESULTS: Six hundred and thirteen MRSA carriers were included, of whom 333 (54%) had complicated carriage; 327 of 530 patients (62%) with known complexity of carriage were treated according to the guideline with an absolute increase in treatment success of 20% (95% confidence interval 12%-28%). Among those with uncomplicated carriage, guideline adherence [adjusted odds ratio (OR(a)) 7.4 (1.7-31.7)], chronic pulmonary disease [OR(a) 44 (2.9-668)], throat carriage [OR(a) 2.9 (1.4-6.1)], perineal carriage [OR(a) 2.2 (1.1-4.4)] and carriage among household contacts [OR(a) 5.6 (1.2-26)] were associated with treatment failure. Among those with complicated carriage, guideline adherence was associated with treatment success [OR(a) 0.2 (0.1-0.3)], whereas throat carriage [OR(a) 4.4 (2.3-8.3)] and dependence in activities of daily living [OR(a) 3.6 (1.4-8.9)] were associated with failure. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline adherence, especially among those with complicated MRSA carriage, was associated with treatment success. Adding patients with extranasal carriage or dependence in daily self-care activities to the definition of complicated carriage, and treating them likewise, may further increase treatment success.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Portador Sano/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Asintomáticas , Portador Sano/microbiología , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Resistencia a la Meticilina , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mupirocina/administración & dosificación , Mupirocina/uso terapéutico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
7.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 66(10): 2409-17, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21719473

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the effectiveness of eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage in the Netherlands after the introduction of a guideline in 2006. The guideline distinguishes complicated (defined as the presence of MRSA infection, skin lesions, foreign-body material, mupirocin resistance and/or exclusive extranasal carriage) and uncomplicated carriage (not meeting criteria for complicated carriage). Mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine soap solution are recommended for uncomplicated carriers and the same treatment in combination with two oral antibiotics for complicated carriage. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in 18 Dutch centres from 1 October 2006 until 1 October 2008. RESULTS: Six hundred and thirteen MRSA carriers underwent one or more decolonization treatments during the study period, mostly after hospital discharge. Decolonization was achieved in 367 (60%) patients with one eradication attempt and ultimately 493 (80%) patients were decolonized, with a median time until decolonization of 10 days (interquartile range 7-43 days). Three hundred and twenty-seven (62%) carriers were treated according to the guideline, which was associated with an absolute increase in treatment success of 20% [from 45% (91/203) to 65% (214/327)]. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty percent of MRSA carriers were successfully decolonized after the first eradication attempt and 62% were treated according to the guideline, which was associated with an increased treatment success.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Portador Sano/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Asintomáticas , Portador Sano/microbiología , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mupirocina/administración & dosificación , Mupirocina/uso terapéutico , Países Bajos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 15(5): 727-34, 2009 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19402958

RESUMEN

Because the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) differs among the 3 countries forming the Euregio Meuse-Rhin (EMR) region (Belgium, Germany, and the Netherlands), cross-border healthcare requires information about the spread of MRSA in the EMR. We investigated the emergence, dissemination, and diversity of MRSA clones in the EMR by using several typing methods. MRSA associated with clonal complexes 5, 8, 30, and 45 was disseminated throughout the EMR. Dutch isolates, mainly associated with sequence types (ST) ST5-MRSA-II, ST5-MRSA-IV, ST8-MRSA-IV, and ST45-MSRA-IV had a more diverse genetic background than the isolates from Belgium and Germany, associated with ST45-MRSA-IV and ST5-MRSA-II, respectively. MRSA associated with pigs (ST398-MRSA-IV/V) was found in the Dutch area of the EMR. Five percent of the MRSA isolates harbored Panton-Valentine leukocidin and were classified as community-associated MRSA associated with ST1, 8, 30, 80, and 89.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/transmisión , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/transmisión , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Bélgica/epidemiología , Clonación Molecular , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Prevalencia , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Factores de Virulencia/genética
10.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 49(10): 4263-71, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16189107

RESUMEN

The Euregio Meuse-Rhine (EMR) is formed by the border regions of Belgium, Germany, and The Netherlands. Cross-border health care requires infection control measures, in particular since the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) differs among the three countries. To investigate the dissemination of MRSA in the EMR, 152 MRSA isolates were characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), SCCmec typing, and multilocus sequence typing. PFGE revealed major clonal groups A, G, L, and Q, suggesting dissemination of MRSA in the EMR. Group A harbored mainly SCCmec type III and sequence types (STs) 239 and 241. The majority of the strains from group G harbored SCCmec type I and ST8 and ST247, whereas most strains from group L carried either SCCmec type IV or type I. Within group L, ST8 and ST228 were found, belonging to clonal complexes 8 and 5, respectively. Most strains from group Q included SCCmec type II and were sequence typed as ST225. Both ST225-MRSA-II and ST241-MRSA-III were novel findings in Germany. In addition, the SCCmec type of two isolates has not been described previously. One strain was classified as SCCmec type III but harbored the pls gene and the dcs region. Another strain was characterized as SCCmec type IV but lacked the dcs region. In addition, one isolate harbored both SCCmec type V and Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Finally, the SCCmec type of the strains was found to be correlated with the antibiotic susceptibility pattern.


Asunto(s)
Resistencia a la Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Bélgica/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Alemania/epidemiología , Epidemiología Molecular , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Prevalencia , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Serotipificación , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos
11.
Anal Quant Cytol Histol ; 24(6): 337-41, 2002 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12508692

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the number of cells to be counted in cytocentrifuged bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid preparations in order to reach a reliable enumeration of each cell type. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 136 BAL fluid samples for patients with suspected pneumonia or interstitial lung disease were investigated. Differential cell counts were performed on May-Grünwald-Giemsa-stained cytocentrifuged preparations by 2 observers, each differentiating 500 cells. Reliability for the enumeration of each cell type was expressed as phi value, as calculated in generalizability theory. RESULTS: For polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), alveolar macrophages, lymphocytes and eosinophils, an acceptable phi value of > or = .95 was reached at a count of 300 cells by 1 observer. Mast cells reached a phi value of only .674 at a count of 500 cells by 1 observer, precluding a reliable count. At a count of 500 cells by 1 observer, squamous epithelial cells, bronchial epithelial cells and plasma cells displayed phi values of .868, .903 and .816, respectively. CONCLUSION: At a count of 300 cells, PMNs, alveolar macrophages, lymphocytes and eosinophils are reliably enumerated in cytocentrifuged BAL fluid samples.


Asunto(s)
Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/citología , Recuento de Leucocitos/métodos , Recuento de Células/métodos , Centrifugación , Eosinófilos/citología , Células Epiteliales/citología , Humanos , Linfocitos/citología , Macrófagos Alveolares/citología , Mastocitos/citología , Neutrófilos/citología , Células Plasmáticas/citología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA