Clinical and Radiological Results after Endoscopic Treatment for Gluteal Tendon Injuries with a Minimum Follow-Up of 12 Months.

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological results after endoscopic repair of gluteus medius muscle injuries and proposed an anatomical classification for the different injury classes. Methods: A retrospective case series, including patients who had undergone endoscopic repair of the hip abductor tendon. The surgical procedure was standardized. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were analyzed, and the injuries were classified into three types: nontransfixing partial-extension (nTPE) tear, transfixing partial-extension (TPE) tear, and transfixing full-extension (TFE) tear. TPE and TFE were considered high-grade tears. The postoperative outcomes were as follows: duration of walking aid requirement, duration of physical therapy, time to return to daily activities, modified Harris Hip score (mHHS) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS) functional scores, pain visual analog scale (VAS), satisfaction, claudication, Trendelenburg test, and reoperation. Results: Sixteen patients were included (94% women; mean age 65 years), with a mean follow-up of 42 months (12-131, range). Out of the cases with preoperative exams available for analysis, four cases (31%) were nTPE, three (23%) TPE, and six (46%) TFE tears. Thus, 69% of the patients had high-grade injuries. These patients had a higher degree of fat infiltration (P = 0.034), but this was not correlated with inferior postoperative clinical or radiological results. One patient required reoperation due to a recurrent injury. Conclusion: Isolated extra-articular injuries to the tendons of the gluteus medius and minimus evolved satisfactorily after endoscopic repair. Due to the small number of cases, it was not possible to observe differences in outcomes between high-and low-grade injuries.

Hip arthroscopy.

Hip arthroscopy is a safe method for treating a variety of pathological conditions that were unknown until a decade ago. Femoroacetabular impingement is the commonest of these pathological conditions and the one with the best results when treated early on. The instruments and surgical technique for hip arthroscopy continue to evolve. New indications for hip arthroscopy has been studied as the ligamentum teres injuries, capsular repair in instabilities, dissection of the sciatic nerve and repair of gluteal muscles tears (injuries to the hip rotator cuff), although still with debatable reproducibility. The complication rate is low, and ever-better results with fewer complications should be expected with the progression of the learning curve.

A artroscopia de quadril é um método seguro para o tratamento de diversas patologias desconhecidas até a última década. O impacto femoroacetabular é a patologia mais comum e com melhores resultados quando tratada precocemente. O instrumental e a técnica cirúrgica da artroscopia de quadril continuam em evolução. Novas indicações de artroscopia de quadril vem sendo estudadas, como o tratamento das lesões do ligamento redondo, capsulorrafia nas instabilidades, dissecação do nervo ciático e reparo de lesões dos músculos glúteos (lesões do manguito rotador do quadril), porém ainda com reprodutibilidade discutível. A taxa de complicações é baixa e resultados cada vez melhores e com menor número de complicações devem ser esperados com a progressão da curva de aprendizado.