RESUMEN
Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (Haplo-SCT) and cord blood transplantation (CBT) are both effective alternative treatments in patients suffering from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and lacking a matched HLA donor. In the last years, many centers have abandoned CBT procedures mostly due to concern about poorer immune recovery compared with Haplo-SCT. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study comparing the outcomes using both alternative approaches in AML. A total of 122 transplants (86 Haplo-SCTs and 36 CBTs) from 12 Spanish centers were collected from 2007 to 2021. Median age at hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was 7 years (0.4-20). Thirty-nine patients (31.9%) showed positive minimal residual disease (MRD) at HSCT and a previous HSCT was performed in 37 patients (30.3%). The median infused cellularity was 14.4 × 106/kg CD34+ cells (6.0-22.07) for Haplo-SCT and 4.74 × 105/kg CD34+ cells (0.8-9.4) for CBT. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 14 days (7-44) for Haplo-SCT and 17 days (8-29) for CBT (P = .03). The median time to platelet engraftment was 14 days (6-70) for Haplo-SCT and 43 days (10-151) for CBT (P < .001). Graft rejection was observed in 13 Haplo-SCTs (15%) and in 6 CBTs (16%). The cumulative incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GvHD) grades II-IV was 54% and 51% for Haplo-SCT and CBT, respectively (P = .50). The cumulative incidence of severe acute GvHD (grades III-IV) was 22% for Haplo-SCT and 25% for CBT (P = .90). There was a tendency to a higher risk of chronic GvHD in the Haplo-SCT group being the cumulative incidence of 30% for Haplo-SCT and 12% for CBT (P = .09). The cumulative incidence of relapse was 28% and 20% for Haplo-SCT and CBT, respectively (P = .60). We did not observe statistically significant differences in outcome measures between Haplo-SCT and CBT procedures: 5-year overall survival (OS) was 64% versus 57% (P = .50), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) 58% versus 57% (P = .80), GvHD-free and relapse-free survival (GFRFS) 41% versus 54% (P = .30), and cumulative incidence of transplant-related mortality (TRM) 14% versus 15% (P = .80), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, MRD positivity and a disease status >CR1 at the time of HSCT were significantly associated with poorer outcomes (P < .05). In conclusion, our study supports that both haploidentical and cord blood transplantation show comparable outcomes in pediatric AML patients. We obtained comparable survival rates, although CBT showed a trend to lower rates of chronic GvHD and higher GFRFS, demonstrating that it should still be considered a valuable option, particularly for pediatric patients.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: ECLIM-SEHOP platform was created in 2017. Its main objective is to establish the infrastructure to allow Spanish participation into international academic collaborative clinical trials, observational studies, and registries in pediatric oncology. The aim of this manuscript is to describe the activity conducted by ECLIM-SEHOP since its creation. METHODS: The platform's database was queried to provide an overview of the studies integrally and partially supported by the organization. Data on trial recruitment and set-up/conduct metrics since its creation until November 2023 were extracted. RESULTS: ECLIM-SEHOP has supported 47 studies: 29 clinical trials and 18 observational studies/registries that have recruited a total of 5250 patients. Integral support has been given to 25 studies: 16 trials recruiting 584 patients and nine observational studies/registries recruiting 278 patients. The trials include front-line studies for leukemia, lymphoma, brain and solid extracranial tumors, and other key transversal topics such as off-label use of targeted therapies and survivorship. The mean time from regulatory authority submission to first patient recruited was 12.2 months and from first international site open to first Spanish site open was 31.3 months. DISCUSSION: ECLIM-SEHOP platform has remarkably improved the availability and accessibility of international academic clinical trials and has facilitated the centralization of resources in childhood cancer treatment. Despite the progressive improvement on clinical trial set-up metrics, timings should still be improved. The program has contributed to leveling survival rates in Spain with those of other European countries that presented major differences in the past.