Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 62
Filtrar
1.
Therapie ; 78(5S): S59-S65, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27793421

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Adverse drug events are the sixth-leading cause of death in Western countries and are also more frequent in emergency departments (EDs). In some hospitals or on some occasions, ED physicians prescribe for patients who they have admitted. These prescriptions are then followed by the wards and can persist for several days. Our objectives were to determine the frequency of prescription errors for patients over 18years old hospitalized from ED to medical or surgical wards, and whether there exists a relationship between those prescription errors and ED LOS. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective study that was conduct in the ED of a university hospital with an annual census of 65 000 patients. The population studied consisted of patients over 18years old hospitalized from ED to medical or surgical wards between January 1st, 2012 and January 21st, 2012. RESULTS: Six hundred eight patients were included. One hundred fifty-four (25%) patients had prescription errors. Prescription errors were associated with increased ED length of stay (OR=2.47; 95% CIs [1.58; 3.92]) and polypharmacy (OR=1.78; 95% CIs [1.20; 2.66]). Fewer prescription errors were found when the patient was examined in the ED by a consultant (OR=0.61; 95% CIs [0.41; 0.91]) and when the medical history was known (OR=0.28; 95% CIs [0.10; 0.88]). CONCLUSION: Prescription errors occurred frequently in the ED. We assume that a clear communication and cooperation between EPs and consultants may help improve prescription accuracy.

2.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 12(8): 4248-4258, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35919065

RESUMEN

Background: Ultra-low dose computed tomography (ULD-CT) was shown to be a good alternative to digital radiographs in various locations. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of ULD-CT versus digital radiographs in patients consulting for extremity traumas in emergency room. Methods: Digital radiography and ULD-CT scan were performed in patients consulting at the emergency department (February-August 2018) for extremity traumas. Fracture detection was evaluated retrospectively by two blinded independent radiologists. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using best value comparator (BVC) and a Bayesian latent class model (LCM) approaches and clinical follow-up. Image quality, quality diagnostic and diagnostic confidence level were evaluated (Likert scale). The effective dose received was calculated. Results: Seventy-six consecutive patients (41 men, mean age: 35.2±13.2 years), with 31 wrists/hands and 45 ankles/feet traumas were managed by emergency physicians. According to clinical data, radiography had 3 false positive and 10 false negative examinations, and ULD-CT, 2 of each. Radiography and ULD-CT specificities were similar; sensitivities were lower for radiography, with BVC and Bayesian. With Bayesian, ULD-CT and radiography sensitivities were 90% (95% CI: 87-93%) and 76% (95% CI: 71-81%, P<0.0001) and specificities 96% (95% CI: 93-98%) and 93% (95% CI: 87-97%, P=0.84). The inter-observer agreement was higher for ULD-CT for all subjective indexes. The effective dose for ULD-CT and radiography was 0.84±0.14 and 0.58±0.27 µSv (P=0.002) for hand/wrist, and 1.50±0.32 and 1.44±0.78 µSv (P=NS) for foot/ankle. Conclusions: With an effective dose level close to radiography, ULD-CT showed better detection of extremities fractures in the emergency room and may allow treatment adaptation. Further studies need to be performed to assess impact of such examination in everyday practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04832490.

3.
J Clin Ultrasound ; 49(3): 212-217, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33196110

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound-guidance of radial artery catheter insertion improves the first attempt success and reduces the occurrence of hematomas. Needle-tracking devices optimize needle-ultrasound beam alignment by displaying in real-time the needle tip position. We compared the median time need by experienced physicians to achieve radial artery puncture using either a conventional ultrasonography device (CUD) or a magnetic needle-tracking ultrasound device (MUD) in a simulation training arm model. METHODS: Fifty experienced residents and physicians performed two punctures in randomized order with the CUD and the MUD. The primary outcome was puncture duration; the secondary outcomes were puncture success, rate of accidental vein puncture, and practitioner's comfort (subjective scale 0-10). RESULTS: The median [lower-upper quartile] puncture time was 10 [6-14] seconds when using CUD and 4 [3-7] seconds when using MUD (P < .01). In the multivariate analysis, MUD use was associated with decreased puncture duration whatever the puncture order (OR 1.13 [1.07-1.20], P < .01). The participants performed 99 (99%) successful punctures: 50 with the MUD (100%) and 49 with the CUD (98%). There was no accidental venous puncture. The practitioner's comfort level was 6.5 [6, 7] with the CUD and 8 [7-9] with the MUD (P < .01). CONCLUSION: MUD reduced radial artery puncture time and improved physician comfort in a simulation training arm model.


Asunto(s)
Fenómenos Magnéticos , Agujas , Punciones/instrumentación , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Radial/cirugía , Entrenamiento Simulado , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/educación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/instrumentación , Ultrasonografía
4.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(10): 2081-2087, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33142179

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound is a feasible and reproducible method for measuring right diaphragmatic excursion (RDE) in ED patients with acute dyspnea (AD). In AD patients, the correlation between the RDE value and the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) is not known. MATERIALS: This was a bicentric, observational prospective study. The RDE measurement was done at admission. The need for MV was defined by the use of MV within 4 h of AD management. An optimal threshold for RDE was determined as the value that minimized the incorrect predictions of the use of MV in the first 4 h as the highest Youden index. RESULTS: We analyzed 102 patients (79 [70; 86] years), 38 (37%) of whom had been ventilated. The RDE value was 1.7 cm [1.4; 2.0] and 2.2 cm [1.8; 2.6] in the ventilated and non-ventilated groups, respectively (p = 0.06). The AUC was 0.68 95% CI [0.57; 0.80]. With a threshold of 2 cm, the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) were 76% [60%; 89%], 59% [46%; 71%], 81% [67%; 91%], and 53% [39%; 66%], respectively. In the non-COPD patients, the RDE values were 1.5 cm [1.2; 1.9] and 2.2 cm [1.8; 2.6] (p < 0.01) in the ventilated and not-ventilated groups, respectively. The AUC was 0.77 95% CI [0.64; 0.90]. With a threshold of 2.18 cm, the sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV were 91% [71%; 99%], 51% [36%; 66%], 92% [75%; 99%], and 54% [38%; 69%], respectively. CONCLUSION: The RDE values at ED admission were unable to define a prognostic threshold value associated with subsequent MV need in the AD patients. In non-COPD patients, the NPV was 92%.


Asunto(s)
Diafragma/anomalías , Disnea/complicaciones , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Área Bajo la Curva , Diafragma/diagnóstico por imagen , Diafragma/fisiopatología , Disnea/fisiopatología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Ultrasonografía/estadística & datos numéricos
5.
Turk J Emerg Med ; 20(3): 97-104, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32832728

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) appears sensitive and reproducible to identify left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The main objective was to analyze the GLS changes in an anesthetized-piglet model of controlled hemorrhagic shock (HS). The secondary objective was to evaluate if GLS changes was different depending on the expansion fluid treatment with or without norepinephrine. METHODS: Eighteen anesthetized and ventilated piglets were bled until the mean arterial pressure reached 40 mmHg. Controlled hemorrhage was maintained for 30 min before randomizing the piglets to three resuscitation groups: control group, LR group (resuscitated with lactated ringer), and NA group (resuscitated with lactated ringer and norepinephrine). RESULTS: There was no difference in the baseline hemodynamic, biological, and ultrasound data among the three groups. During the hemorrhagic phase, the GLS increased significantly from 25 mL/kg of depletion. During the resuscitation phase, the GLS decreased significantly from 20 mL/kg of fluid administration. There was no difference in GLS variation among the groups during the hemorrhagic, maintenance, and resuscitation phases. CONCLUSION: In our HS model, GLS increased with hemorrhage and decreased during resuscitation, showing its preload dependence.

8.
PLoS One ; 14(3): e0213683, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30893349

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) guidance has yet to prove its applicability in radial arterial blood gas analysis (ABGA) punctures. The main objective of our study was to compare the number of first-attempt successes (NFAS) for radial arterial puncture in difficult patients with or without US guidance. The Secondary aims were to compare the number of punctures (NOP), puncture time, and patient pain. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized controlled trial, patients who required a radial ABGA and in whom the arterial puncture was assessed as difficult (because of non-palpable radial arteries or two previous puncture failures by a nurse) were assigned to the US group or no-US (NUS) group (procedure performed by a trained physician). RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included in the US group and 37 in the NUS groups. The NFAS was 7 (19%) in the NUS group and 19 (53%) in the US group. The relative risk of success in the US group was 2.79 (95% CI,1.34 to 5.82), p = 0.01. In the NUS and US groups, respectively, the median NOP was 3 [2; 6] vs. 1 [1; 2], estimated difference -2.0 (95%CI, -3.4 to -0.6), p < 0.01; the respective puncture time was 3.1 [1.6; 5.4] vs. 1.4 [0.6; 3.1] min, estimated difference -1.45 (95%CI, -2.57 to -0.39), p = 0.01; the respective median patient pain was 6 [4; 8] vs. 2 [1; 4], estimated difference -4.0 (95%CI, -5.8 to -2.3); p < 0.01. CONCLUSION: US guidance by a trained physician significantly improves the rate of success in difficult radial ABGA patients.


Asunto(s)
Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/métodos , Punciones/métodos , Arteria Radial/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Arterias , Recolección de Muestras de Sangre/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Punciones/efectos adversos , Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
9.
Air Med J ; 38(2): 100-105, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30898280

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Minimizing out-of-hospital time reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with severe trauma, acute coronary syndrome, or acute stroke. Our objective was to compare out-of-hospital times by helicopter versus ground services when the estimated time of arrival on the scene was over 20 minutes. METHODS: We proposed a retrospective observational monocentric study following 2 cohorts. The helicopter group and the ground group included patients with severe trauma, acute coronary syndrome, or acute stroke transported by helicopter or ground services. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-nine patients were included; 118 were in the ground group, and 121 were in the helicopter group. Distances for the helicopter group were higher (62.1 ± 22.5 km vs. 27.6 ± 10.4 km, P < .001). When distances were over 35 km, the helicopter group was faster. We identified distance, need for surgery, and intensive care hospitalization as 3 predicting factors for choosing helicopters over ground modes of transport. CONCLUSION: In cases of severe trauma, acute coronary syndrome, or acute stroke, emergency medical helicopter transport can be chosen over ground transport when patients are in a severe state and when the distance is further than 35 km from the hospital.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Ambulancias Aéreas/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Heridas y Lesiones , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados Críticos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Heridas y Lesiones/cirugía
10.
Ann Emerg Med ; 73(6): 665-670, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30665773

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest ultralow-dose computed tomography (CT) compared with chest radiograph for minor blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: One hundred sixty patients with minor blunt thoracic trauma were evaluated first by chest radiograph and subsequently with a double-acquisition nonenhanced chest CT protocol: reference CT and ultralow-dose CT with iterative reconstruction. Two study radiologists independently assessed injuries with a structured report and subjective image quality and calculated certainty of diagnostic confidence level. RESULTS: Ultralow-dose CT had a sensitivity and specificity of 100% compared with reference CT in the detection of injuries (187 lesions) in 104 patients. Chest radiograph detected abnormalities in 82 patients (79% of the population), with lower sensitivity and specificity compared with ultralow-dose CT (P<.05). Despite an only fair interobserver agreement for ultralow-dose CT image quality (κ=0.26), the diagnostic confidence level was certain for 95.6% of patients (chest radiograph=79.3%). Ultralow-dose CT effective dose (0.203 mSv [SD 0.029 mSv]) was similar (P=.14) to that of chest radiograph (0.175 mSv [SD 0.155 mSv]) and significantly less (P<.001) than that of reference CT (1.193 mSv [SD 0.459 mSv]). CONCLUSION: Ultralow-dose CT with iterative reconstruction conveyed a radiation dose similar to that of chest radiograph and was more reliable than a radiographic study for minor blunt thoracic trauma assessment. Radiologists, regardless of experience with ultralow-dose CT, were more confident with chest ultralow-dose CT than chest radiograph.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Radiografía Torácica , Traumatismos Torácicos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Dosis de Radiación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
11.
J Vasc Access ; 20(4): 404-408, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30457029

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aims of our study were to compare the performance of experienced emergency physicians for internal jugular vein puncture using a conventional ultrasound device versus a pocket-sized ultrasound in a training model. METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, randomized study, emergency physicians performed one puncture with each device in a randomized order. No emergency physicians used a pocket-sized ultrasound for central vascular catheter insertion in clinical practice. A medium-fidelity training model was used. Each image was judged based on an image quality scale from 0 to 5. RESULTS: Twenty emergency physicians were included: nine females (45%), median experience 2.5 years [2.0;4.3]. The median time to achieve a puncture with the conventional ultrasound device was 22 s [17;26] versus 28 s [13;43] with the pocket-sized ultrasound (p = 0.43). Eighteen (90%) emergency physician punctures were successful with the conventional ultrasound device versus 18 (90%) with the pocket-sized ultrasound (p = 1). The image quality was 4 [3;5] in the conventional ultrasound device group versus 4 [3;5] in the pocket-sized ultrasound group (p = 0.32). CONCLUSION: Pocket-sized ultrasound and conventional ultrasound device performances are not statistically different for internal jugular vein-guided ultrasonography in a training model. These results must be confirmed in a clinical study.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/instrumentación , Venas Yugulares/diagnóstico por imagen , Médicos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Entrenamiento Simulado/métodos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/instrumentación , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Diseño de Equipo , Francia , Humanos , Maniquíes , Estudios Prospectivos , Punciones , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Factores de Tiempo
12.
Shock ; 52(4): 449-455, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30300317

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The correlation between cardiac output (CO) evaluated by echocardiography and CO measured by thermodilution (COth) varies according to different studies. A new transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) tool allows automatic calculation of the subaortic velocity time index (VTIauto) and CO (COauto). The main objective was to evaluate the correlation between COth and COauto in an anesthetized, ventilated piglet hemorrhagic shock (HS) model. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the correlation between COth and CO evaluated by manual measurements of VTI, and the preload-dependency of VTIvaresp. METHODS: Eighteen piglets were bled until mean arterial pressure reached 40 mm Hg. Controlled hemorrhage was maintained for 30 min before a resuscitation phase. CO was measured by Pulse index Contour Cardiac Output thermodilution methods. At each time of the experiment, three VTI values were measured (min, med, max) and the average value was calculated. COs were calculated by TTE (COmax, COmed, COmin, COave). RESULTS: For the 204 measures attempted, the success rate was 197 (97%) manually and 122 (60%) automatically (P < 0.01). The correlation coefficients (r) between COth and, respectively, COauto, COave, COmax, COmed, and COmin were: 0.83 (95% CI [0.76; 0.88]; P < 0.01), 0.54 (95% CI [0.43; 0.63]; P < 0.01), 0.43 (95% CI [0.31; 0.54]; P < 0.01), 0.58 (95% CI [0.48; 0.67]; P < 0.01), and 0.52 (95% CI [0.41; 0.62]; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In an experimental model of HS, a new ultrasound tool, COauto, seems better correlated with COth than manual echocardiographic measurements.


Asunto(s)
Gasto Cardíaco , Ecocardiografía/instrumentación , Choque Hemorrágico , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Choque Hemorrágico/diagnóstico por imagen , Choque Hemorrágico/fisiopatología , Porcinos
13.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(7): 1262-1264, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29653786

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Compression ultrasonography (CUS) is a validated technique for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), but has never been studied with pocket-sized ultrasound device (PUD). The main objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of CUS made by emergency physicians (EPs) using a PUD. MATERIALS: This was a prospective, diagnostic test assessment, single-center study. Patients underwent VCU performed by a trained EP with PUD (CUS-PUD) for searching proximal DVT (PDVT) and were then seen by an expert vascular physician who blindly performed a duplex venous ultrasound, which was the criterion standard. CUS-PUD's diagnostic performance was evaluated by sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV). RESULTS: The sample included 57 patients of whom 56 were analyzed. Eleven (20%) PDVT were diagnosed with CUS-PUD: 7 (64%) femoral and 4 (36%) popliteal. The CUS-PUD's Se was 100% [72%; 100%], Sp 100% [92%; 100%]. The PPV was 100% [74%; 100%], and the NPV was 100% [90%; 100%]. CONCLUSION: CUS-PUD performed with a pocket-sized ultrasound appears to be feasible in emergency practice for the diagnosis of proximal DVT. A study with a larger sample size will have to describe the accuracy.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Vena Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Vena Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/instrumentación , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presión , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
14.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(7): 1265-1269, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29650397

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The present study was aimed at comparing the diagnosis concordance of five echo probes of lung ultrasound (LUS) with CT scans in intensive care and emergency patients with acute respiratory failure. MATERIALS: This prospective, observational, pilot study involved 10 acute patients in whom a thoracic CT scan was performed. An expert performed an LUS reference exam using five different probes: three probes with a high-quality conventional echo machine (cardiac phased-array probe, abdominal convex probe, linear probe) and two probes (cardiac and linear) with a pocket ultrasound device (PUD). Then, a trained physician and a resident performed 'blinded' analyses by viewing the video results on a computer. The primary objective was to test concordance between the blinded echo diagnosis and the CT scan. RESULTS: In the 100 LUS performed, the phased-array probe of the conventional machine and linear array probe of the PUD have the best concordance with the CT scan (Kappa coefficient=0.75 [CI 95%=0.54-0.96] and 0.62 [CI 95%=0.37-0.86], respectively) only for experts and trained physicians. The agreement was always poor for residents. Convex (abdominal) and linear transducers of conventional machines and the phased-array transducers (cardiac) of PUD have poor or very poor agreement, regardless of the physician's experience. CONCLUSION: Among the probes tested for LUS in acute patients, the cardiac probe of conventional machines and the linear probes of PUDs provide good diagnosis concordance with CT scans when performed by an expert and trained physician, but not by residents.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Transductores , Ultrasonografía/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
15.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(9): 1597-1602, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29366658

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Misdiagnosis in acute dyspneic patients (ADP) has consequences on their outcome. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an accurate tool to improve diagnostic performance. The main goal of this study was to assess the determinants of increased diagnostic accuracy using LUS. MATERIALS: Multicentre, prospective, randomized study including emergency physicians and critical care physicians treating ADP on a daily basis. Each participant received three difficult clinical cases of ADP: one with only clinical data (OCD), one with only LUS data (OLD), and one with both. Ultrasound video loops of A, B and C profiles were associated with the cases. Which physician received what data for which clinical case was randomized. Physicians assessed the diagnostic probability from 0 to 10 for each possible diagnosis. The number of uncertain diagnoses (NUD) was the number of diagnoses with a diagnostic probability between 3 and 7, inclusive. RESULTS: Seventy-six physicians responded to the study cases (228 clinical cases resolved). Among the respondents, 28 (37%) were female, 64 (84%) were EPs, and the mean age was 37±8 years. The mean NUDs, respectively, when physicians had OCD, OLD, and both were 2.9±1.8, 2.2±1.7, 2.2±1.8 (p = 0.02). Ultrasound data and ultrasound frequency of use were the only variables related to the NUD. Higher frequency of ultrasound use by physicians decreased the number of uncertain diagnoses in difficult clinical cases with ultrasound data (OLD or associated with clinical data). CONCLUSION: LUS decreases the NUD in ADP. The ultrasound frequency of use decreased the NUD in ADP clinical cases with LUS data.


Asunto(s)
Disnea/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Competencia Clínica/normas , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Cuidados Críticos , Errores Diagnósticos , Medicina de Emergencia/normas , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Marruecos , Médicos/normas , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Ultrasonografía
16.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 37(2): 147-153, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28882741

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: After general anaesthesia (GA) in adults, the optimal tracheal extubation technique (positive pressure or suctioning) remains debated. The primary endpoint of this study was to assess the effects of these techniques on onset time of desaturation (SpO2<92%). METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with a body mass index<30 scheduled for elective orthopaedic surgery were allocated to positive pressure (PP) or suctioning (SUC) group. GA was standardised with propofol and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion. A morphine bolus of 0.15mg/kg was administered 20-30mins before the end of surgery. The effect of extubation technique on onset time of desaturation (T92) was assessed during the first 10mins after extubation during the spontaneous air breathing. Secondary endpoints included: frequency of desaturation, respiratory complications, need to use oxygen therapy and SpO2 at the end of the first hour while breathing in air (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01323049). RESULTS: Baseline patient characteristics and intraoperative management data for the 68 patients included had no relevant clinical difference between groups. T92 (sec) after tracheal extubation was 214 (168) vs. 248 (148) in the PP and SUC groups, respectively (P=0.44). In the PP and SUC groups, 50 and 43% reached a SpO2<92% within the first 10mins after extubation respectively (P=0.73). There were no statistically significant differences between groups for any secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Positive pressure extubation as compared with suctioning extubation did not seem to delay onset time of desaturation after GA in standard weight adult patients.


Asunto(s)
Extubación Traqueal/métodos , Anestesia General/métodos , Respiración con Presión Positiva/métodos , Succión , Adulto , Determinación de Punto Final , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Oxígeno/sangre , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Análisis de Supervivencia
17.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 36(6): 383-389, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28412493

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of our study were to evaluate the prevalence of emergency point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) use and to assess the impact of POCUS on: diagnostic, therapeutic, patient orientation and imaging practices. METHODS: This was a one-day, prospective, observational study carried out across multiple centers. Fifty emergency departments (EDs) recorded all POCUS performed over a 24h period. The prevalence of POCUS was defined as the number of POCUS/number of patients seen in all units. The "diagnostic impact" was defined as a POCUS-induced confirmation or change to the initial clinical diagnosis. The "therapeutic impact" was defined as a POCUS-induced change in treatment. The "orientation impact" was defined as an ultrasound-induced confirmation or change in the initial orientation. The "imaging change" was defined as a radiologic imaging prescription modification. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine (5%) POCUS were performed on 192 patients (4%) from among the 4671 patients seen on the study day in the 50 EDs. No ultrasound procedural guidance was given during the study day. The diagnostic, therapeutic and orientation impacts were respectively 82%, 47% and 85%. In 101 cases (44%), POCUS led to at least one imaging change. The clinical value of POCUS, i.e. considering at least one impact and/or imaging change, was assessed at 95%. CONCLUSION: This study shows that POCUS is used on a minority of emergency patients. However, when used, it significantly affects diagnostic and therapeutic practices in the emergency setting.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia
19.
Clin Chim Acta ; 464: 182-188, 2017 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27889429

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Presepsin (sCD14-ST) is an emerging biomarker for infection. We hypothesized that presepsin could specifically increase during acute pyelonephritis and correlate with severity. METHODS: We compared presepsin values in patients with acute pyelonephritis and controls, and we assessed its capacity to predict bacteraemia and admission in patients. RESULTS: In 312 patients with acute pyelonephritis (median age 33years), presepsin concentrations were higher than in controls (476 vs 200ng/L, p<0.001). ROC curve indicated an AUC at 0.90 [for presepsin (vs. 0.99 and 0.98 for CRP and PCT, respectively; p<0.05) and an optimal threshold at 340ng/L (74% sensitivity, 94% specificity). Presepsin concentrations increased in acute pyelonephritis patients with bacteraemia (614 vs. 461ng/L, p,=0.001) and in those requiring admission (614ng/L vs. 320ng/L, p<0.001). Performance of presepsin to predict bacteraemia [AUC=0.63, 95%CI: 0.55-0.72] was similar to CRP (AUC=0.64, p=0.87) and less accurate than PCT (AUC=0.78, p<0.001). AUC for presepsin to detect the need for admission was 0.67, and comparable to CRP (p=0.26) and PCT (p=0.18). CONCLUSION: Presepsin is a valuable biomarker to detect patients with acute pyelonephritis. However, it presents mild performance to predict bacteraemia and the need for admission, and offers no advantage as compared to CRP and PCT.


Asunto(s)
Receptores de Lipopolisacáridos/sangre , Fragmentos de Péptidos/sangre , Pielonefritis/sangre , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Bacteriemia/complicaciones , Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pielonefritis/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA