Online mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for fatigue in patients with sarcoidosis (TIRED): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis-associated fatigue is highly prevalent and is often reported as the most burdensome symptom of sarcoidosis. Management of fatigue is challenging, and evidence-based therapies are lacking. In this TIRED trial, we aimed to assess the effects of a 12-week online mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (eMBCT) on fatigue. METHODS: This study was a prospective, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial, conducted at three centres in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had stable sarcoidosis, and a score of more than 21 points on the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). Patients were randomised into either the eMBCT or the control group. Participants completed patient-reported outcome measures at baseline, after intervention (T1), and 12 weeks after completion of eMBCT (T2). The primary outcome was the change in FAS score at T1 in the eMBCT group compared with the control group, assessed with the independent students't test in all patients who started the study. Secondary outcomes included within-group difference in FAS score at T1 and T2, between-group difference in FAS score at T2, and changes in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory-Short Form, and the Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire. The study was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register, NL7816. FINDINGS: Between June 5, 2019, and Oct 28, 2021, 99 patients were randomly assigned to the eMBCT (n=52) or the control (n=47) groups. Six patients withdrew consent after psychological screening before the start of eMBCT. Baseline FAS score was similar in both groups (34·57 [SD 6·07] for 46 patients in the eMBCT group and 35·51 [4·65] for 47 patients in the control group). Mean change in FAS score at T1 was -4·53 (SD 5·77; p<0·0001) in the eMBCT group and -1·28 (3·80; p=0·026) in the control group (between-group difference 3·26 [95% CI 1·18 to 5·33; p=0·0025]). Furthermore, the eMBCT group had a significant improvement in anxiety (mean between-group difference 1·69, 95% CI 0·22-3·16; p=0·025), depressive symptoms (1·52, 0·08-2·95; p=0·039), mindfulness (3·1, 0·70-5·49; p=0·022), and general health status (6·28, 2·51-10·06; p=0·002) at T1, compared with the control group. INTERPRETATION: 12 week eMBCT improves fatigue, anxiety, depression, mindfulness, and health status in patients with sarcoidosis-associated fatigue. FUNDING: Dutch Sarcoidosis Patient Association (Sarcoidose.nl). TRANSLATION: For the Dutch translation of the summary see Supplementary Materials section.

What is the prevalence of fear of cancer recurrence in cancer survivors and patients? A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Care for fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is considered the most common unmet need among cancer survivors. Yet the prevalence of FCR and predisposing factors remain inconclusive. To support targeted care, we provide a comprehensive overview of the prevalence and severity of FCR among cancer survivors and patients, as measured using the short form of the validated Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory (FCRI-SF). We also report on associations between FCR and clinical and demographic characteristics. METHODS: This is a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis on the prevalence of FCR. In the review, we included all studies that used the FCRI-SF with adult (≥18 years) cancer survivors and patients. Date of search: 7 February 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. RESULTS: IPD were requested from 87 unique studies and provided for 46 studies comprising 11,226 participants from 13 countries. 9311 respondents were included for the main analyses. On the FCRI-SF (range 0-36), 58.8% of respondents scored ≥13, 45.1% scored ≥16 and 19.2% scored ≥22. FCR decreased with age and women reported more FCR than men. FCR was found across cancer types and continents and for all time periods since cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: FCR affects a considerable number of cancer survivors and patients. It is therefore important that healthcare providers discuss this issue with their patients and provide treatment when needed. Further research is needed to investigate how best to prevent and treat FCR and to identify other factors associated with FCR. The protocol was prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD42020142185).

Patient perspectives in sarcoidosis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The review presents an overview of the scientific publications about patient perspectives in sarcoidosis. RECENT FINDINGS: The literature on patient perspectives in sarcoidosis is limited. Patient perspectives in sarcoidosis encompass a myriad of topics that have been addressed to some degree in the literature: patient needs and perceptions, patient-reported burden of sarcoidosis, and patient treatment priorities. Similar findings across studies were high levels of reported fatigue, a need to incorporate psychological support into the treatment plan and easy access to sarcoidosis expert centers. Furthermore, largely similar results were found across countries. SUMMARY: There is a growing focus in patient perspectives in terms of sarcoidosis treatment. A multidisciplinary approach including psychological support and attention to fatigue, may better reflect the needs of sarcoidosis patients. Further research on sarcoidosis patient perspectives in sarcoidosis is needed to optimize care.

The distressed (Type D) personality mediates the relationship between remembered parenting and psychological distress in cardiac patients.

OBJECTIVE: Both the distressed (Type D) personality (i.e. the combination of negative affectivity and social inhibition traits) and dysfunctional parenting styles are associated with anxiety and depression. As parenting styles have been related to personality development, dysfunctional parenting styles may also be associated with Type D personality. We examined whether remembered parenting was associated with anxiety and depression in cardiac patients and whether Type D personality mediated this relationship. METHODS: Our sample comprised 435 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and 123 patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Patients completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Type D Scale (DS14), and Remembered Relationship with Parents (RRP(10)) scale. RESULTS: Remembered parenting was significantly associated with higher anxiety and depression levels and Type D personality. In multivariable linear regression analyses, Type D personality accounted for 25-29% of the variance in anxiety and 23-46% of the variance in depression, while remembered parenting was no longer significantly associated with these domains. Sobel tests and bootstrapping indicated that Type D personality mediated the relationship between remembered parenting and anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: Type D personality mediated the relationship between remembered parenting and anxiety and depression in both PCI and CHF patients.