RESUMEN
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Chemo-radiotherapy can improve the oncological outcome of esophageal cancer (EC) patients, but may cause long term radiation-induced toxicity, including an increased risk of non-cancer related death. For lung cancer patients, a model to predict 2-year total mortality using mean heart dose (MHD) and gross tumor volume (GTV) has previously been developed and validated. This project aimed to externally validate this model in EC patients. METHODS: Five EC patient cohorts from 3 different Dutch centres were used for model validation. External validity of the model was assessed separately in definitive (nâ¯=â¯170) and neo-adjuvant (nâ¯=â¯568) chemoradiotherapy (dCRT and nCRT) patients. External validity was assessed in terms of calibration by calibration plots, calibration-in-the-large (CITL) and calibration slope (CS), and discrimination by assessment of the c-statistic. If suboptimal model performance was observed, the model was further updated accordingly. RESULTS: For the dCRT patients, good calibration was found after adjustment of the intercept (CITL 0.00; CS 1.08). The c-statistic of the adjusted model was 0.67 (95%CI: 0.58 to 0.75). For nCRT patients the model needed adjustment of both the slope and the intercept because of initial miscalibration in the validation population (CITL 0.00; CS 1.72). After recalibration, the model showed perfect calibration (i.e., CITL 0, CS 1), as is common after recalibration. The c-statistic of the recalibrated model equaled 0.62 (95%CI: 0.57 to 0.67). CONCLUSION: The existing model for 2-year mortality prediction in lung cancer patients, based on the predictive factors MHD and GTV, showed good performance in EC patients after updating the intercept and/or slope of the original model.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the era of individualized gastric cancer (GC) treatment, accurate determination of histological subtype becomes increasingly relevant. As yet, it is unclear whether preoperative chemotherapy may affect the histological subtype. The aim of this study was to assess concordance in histological subtype between pretreatment biopsies and surgical resection specimens before and after the introduction of perioperative treatment. METHODS: Histological subtype was centrally determined in paired GC biopsies and surgical resection specimens of patients treated with either surgery alone (SA) in the Dutch D1/D2 study or with preoperative chemotherapy (CT) in the CRITICS trial. The histological subtype as determined in the resection specimen was considered the gold standard. Concordance rates and sensitivity and specificity of intestinal, diffuse, mixed, and "other" subtypes of GC were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 105 and 515 pairs of GC biopsies and resection specimens of patients treated in the SA and CT cohorts, respectively, were included. Overall concordance in the histological subtype was 72% in the SA and 74% in the CT cohort and substantially higher in the diffuse subtype (83% and 86%) compared to the intestinal (70% and 74%), mixed (21% and 33%) and "other" subtypes (54% and 54%). In the SA cohort, sensitivities and specificities were 0.88 and 0.71 in the intestinal, 0.67 and 0.93 in the diffuse, 0.20 and 0.98 in the mixed, and 0.50 and 0.93 in the "other" subtypes, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that accurate determination of histological subtype on gastric cancer biopsies is suboptimal but that the impact of preoperative chemotherapy on histological subtype is negligible.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , BiopsiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) account for ≤1% of all GISTs. Consequently, evidence to guide clinical decision-making is limited. METHODS: Clinicopathological features and outcomes in patients with primary oesophageal GIST from seven European countries were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were identified, and median follow up was 55.0 months. At diagnosis, 59.0% had localized disease, 25.3% locally advanced and 13.3% synchronous metastasis. A biopsy (Fine Needle aspiration n = 29, histological biopsy n = 31) was performed in 60 (72.3%) patients. The mitotic count was low (<5 mitoses/50 High Power Fields (HPF)) in 24 patients and high (≥5 mitoses/50 HPF) in 27 patients. Fifty-one (61.4%) patients underwent surgical or endoscopic resection. The most common reasons to not perform an immediate resection (n = 31) were; unresectable or metastasized GIST, performance status/comorbidity, patient refusal or ongoing neo-adjuvant therapy. The type of resections were enucleation (n = 11), segmental resection (n = 6) and oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction (n = 33), with median tumour size of 3.3 cm, 4.5 cm and 7.7 cm, respectively. In patients treated with enucleation 18.2% developed recurrent disease. The recurrence rate in patients treated with segmental resection was 16.7% and in patients undergoing oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction 36.4%. Larger tumours (≥4.0 cm) and high (>5/5hpf) mitotic count were associated with worse disease free survival. CONCLUSION: Based on the current study, enucleation can be recommended for oesophageal GIST smaller than 4 cm, while oesophagectomy should be preserved for larger tumours. Patients with larger tumours (>4 cm) and/or high mitotic count should be treated with adjuvant therapy.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía , Esofagoscopía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/secundario , Humanos , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice Mitótico , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The PERISCOPE I study was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of (sub)total gastrectomy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with oxaliplatin and docetaxel for gastric cancer patients who have limited peritoneal dissemination. The current analysis investigated changes in perioperative management together with their impact on postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Patients with resectable gastric cancer and limited peritoneal dissemination were administered (sub)total gastrectomy, CRS, and HIPEC with oxaliplatin (460 mg/m2) and docetaxel (escalating scheme: 0, 50, 75 mg/m2). Of the 25 patients who completed the study protocol, 14 were treated in the dose-escalation cohort and 11 were treated in the expansion cohort (to optimize perioperative management). RESULTS: A significant proportion of the patients in the dose-escalation cohort (n = 7, 50%) had ileus-related complications. In this cohort, enteral nutrition was started immediately after surgery at 20 ml/h, which was increased on day 1 to meet nutritional needs. In the expansion cohort, enteral nutrition was administered at 10 ml/h until day 3, then restricted to 20 ml/h until day 6, supplemented with total parenteral nutrition to meet nutritional needs. Ileus-related complications occurred for two patients (18%) of the expansion cohort. The intensive care unit (ICU) readmission rate decreased from 50 (n = 7) to 9% (n = 1; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a strict nutritional protocol during the PERISCOPE I study was associated with a decrease in postoperative complications. Based on these results, a perioperative care path was described for the gastric cancer HIPEC patients in the PERISCOPE II study.
Asunto(s)
Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Neoplasias Gástricas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapiaRESUMEN
In the PERISCOPE I study, gastric cancer patients with limited peritoneal dissemination were treated with systemic chemotherapy followed by (sub)total gastrectomy, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with 460 mg/m2 hyperthermic oxaliplatin followed by normothermic docetaxel in escalating doses (0, 50, 75 mg/m2). In total, 25 patients completed the study protocol. Plasma samples were collected before the start of the HIPEC procedure, after oxaliplatin washing, after docetaxel washing and the following morning. Median peak plasma concentrations were 5.5∗10-3 mg/ml for oxaliplatin, 89∗10-6 mg/ml for docetaxel (dose 50 mg/m2) and 113∗10-6 mg/ml for docetacel (dose 75 mg/m2). The following morning median plasma concentrations were 32% and 4% of the measured peak concentrations for oxaliplatin and docetaxel, respectively. For both cytostatic agents, no correlation was found between intraperitoneal fluid concentration and peak plasma concentration. High doses oxaliplatin and docetaxel can be given intraperitoneally without causing potentially toxic systemic concentrations.
Asunto(s)
Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Peritonitis/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Terapia Combinada , Docetaxel/farmacocinética , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Inyecciones Intraperitoneales , Oxaliplatino/farmacocinética , Neoplasias Peritoneales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Peritoneales/metabolismo , Peritonitis/etiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Intergroup 0116 and the MAGIC trials changed clinical practice for resectable gastric cancer in the Western world. In these trials, overall survival improved with post-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and perioperative chemotherapy (CT). Intention-to-treat analysis in the CRITICS trial of post-operative CT or post-operative CRT did not show a survival difference. The current study reports on the per-protocol (PP) analysis of the CRITICS trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The CRITICS trial was a randomized, controlled trial in which 788 patients with stage Ib-Iva resectable gastric or esophagogastric adenocarcinoma were included. Before start of preoperative CT, patients from the Netherlands, Sweden and Denmark were randomly assigned to receive post-operative CT or CRT. For the current analysis, only patients who started their allocated post-operative treatment were included. Since it is uncertain that the two treatment arms are balanced in such PP analysis, adjusted proportional hazards regression analysis and inverse probability weighted analysis were used to minimize the risk of selection bias and to estimate and compare overall and event-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 788 patients, 478 started post-operative treatment according to protocol, 233 (59%) patients in the CT group and 245 (62%) patients in the CRT group. Patient and tumor characteristics between the groups before start of the post-operative treatment were not different. After a median follow-up of 6.7 years since the start of post-operative treatment, the 5-year overall survival was 57.9% (95% confidence interval: 51.4% to 64.3%) in the CT group versus 45.5% (95% confidence interval: 39.2% to 51.8%) in the CRT group (adjusted hazard ratio CRT versus CT: 1.62 (1.24-2.12), P = 0.0004). Inverse probability weighted analysis resulted in similar hazard ratios. CONCLUSION: After adjustment for all known confounding factors, the PP analysis of patients who started the allocated post-operative treatment in the CRITICS trial showed that the CT group had a significantly better 5-year overall survival than the CRT group (NCT00407186).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Gástricas , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , SueciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The Lauren classification of gastric adenocarcinoma describes three histological subtypes, the intestinal, the diffuse and the mixed type carcinoma. The metastatic pattern of gastric adenocarcinoma by histological subtype has not been studied. METHODS: Gastric adenocarcinoma patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis between 1999 and 2017 were identified through the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The Lauren classification was determined based on pathology reports archived in the Dutch Pathology Registry and was linked to individual cases in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. RESULTS: Among 8 231 newly diagnosed, metastatic and evaluable gastric adenocarcinoma patients, 57 % had an intestinal type carcinoma, 38 % patients had a diffuse type carcinoma and 5 % had a mixed type carcinoma. Intestinal type carcinomas more often metastasized to the liver (57 % versus 21 %, p < 0.0001) and lungs (13 % versus 7 %, p < 0.0001), whereas diffuse type carcinomas more often metastasized to the peritoneum (58 % versus 29 %, p < 0.0001) and bones (9 % versus 6 %, p < 0.0001). Patients with a diffuse type carcinoma had a worse survival perspective regardless of the number or the location of the metastases. CONCLUSION: In this national cohort study, metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma of the intestinal type had a predilection for the liver and that of the diffuse type for the peritoneum.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas/complicaciones , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Análisis de SupervivenciaAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Peritoneales , Peritonitis , Neoplasias Gástricas , Docetaxel , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Peritonitis/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in gastric cancer is unknown. This non-randomized dose-finding phase I-II study was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of HIPEC, following systemic chemotherapy, in patients with gastric cancer and limited peritoneal dissemination. The maximum tolerated dose of normothermic intraperitoneal docetaxel in combination with a fixed dose of intraperitoneal oxaliplatin was also explored. METHODS: Patients with resectable cT3-cT4a gastric adenocarcinoma with limited peritoneal metastases and/or tumour-positive peritoneal cytology were included. An open HIPEC technique was used with 460 mg/m2 hyperthermic oxaliplatin for 30 min followed by normothermic docetaxel for 90 min in escalating doses (0, 50, 75 mg/m2 ). RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2017, 37 patients were included. Of 25 patients who completed the full study protocol, four were treated at dose level 1 (0 mg/m2 docetaxel), six at dose level 2 (50 mg/m2 ) and four at dose level 3 (75 mg/m2 ). At dose level 3, two dose-limiting toxicities occurred, both associated with postoperative ileus. Thereafter, another 11 patients were treated at dose level 2, with no more dose-limiting toxicities. Based on this, the maximum tolerated dose was 50 mg/m2 intraperitoneal docetaxel. Serious adverse events were scored in 17 of 25 patients. The reoperation rate was 16 per cent (4 of 25) and the treatment-related mortality rate was 8 per cent (2 patients, both in dose level 3). CONCLUSION: Gastrectomy combined with cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC was feasible using 460 mg/m2 oxaliplatin and 50 mg/m2 normothermic docetaxel.
ANTECEDENTES: El papel de la cirugía citorreductora (cytoreductive surgery, CRS) combinado con la quimioterapia intraperitoneal hipertérmica (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, HIPEC) en el cáncer gástrico no está definido. Este estudio fase I-II no aleatorizado de escalado de dosis fue diseñado para evaluar la seguridad y la viabilidad de HIPEC, después de la quimioterapia sistémica, en pacientes con cáncer gástrico con diseminación peritoneal limitada. Además, se exploró la máxima dosis tolerada (maximum tolerated dose, MTD) de docetaxel intraperitoneal normotérmico en combinación con una dosis fija de oxaliplatino intraperitoneal. MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron pacientes con adenocarcinoma gástrico cT3-cT4a resecable con metástasis peritoneales limitadas y/o citología peritoneal positiva. Se utilizó una técnica HIPEC abierta con 460 mg/m2 de oxaliplatino hipertérmico (30 minutos) seguido de docetaxel normotérmico (90 minutos) en dosis crecientes (0, 50, 75 mg/m2 ). RESULTADOS: Entre 2014 y 2017, se incluyeron 37 pacientes. De los 25 pacientes que completaron la totalidad del protocolo del estudio, 4 pacientes fueron tratados en el nivel de dosis 1 (0 mg/m2 de docetaxel), 6 pacientes en el nivel de dosis 2 (50 mg/m2 ) y 4 pacientes en el nivel de dosis 3 (75 mg/m2 ). En el nivel de dosis 3, se produjeron dos casos de toxicidad limitante de dosis (dose-limiting toxicities, DLTs), ambas asociadas con un íleo postoperatorio. Posteriormente, otros 11 pacientes fueron tratados con el nivel de dosis 2, y no se produjeron más DLTs. La MTD de docetaxel intraperitoneal fue de 50 mg/m2 . Se registraron efectos adversos graves en 17 de 25 pacientes. La tasa de reoperación fue del 16% (n = 4) y la mortalidad relacionada con el tratamiento fue del 8% (n = 2; ambos en el nivel de dosis 3).
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Anciano , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Docetaxel/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: At present, palliative systemic chemotherapy is the standard treatment in the Netherlands for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal dissemination. In contrast to lymphatic and haematogenous dissemination, peritoneal dissemination may be regarded as locoregional spread of disease. Administering cytotoxic drugs directly into the peritoneal cavity has an advantage over systemic chemotherapy since high concentrations can be delivered directly into the peritoneal cavity with limited systemic toxicity. The combination of a radical gastrectomy with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has shown promising results in patients with gastric cancer in Asia. However, the results obtained in Asian patients cannot be extrapolated to Western patients. The aim of this study is to compare the overall survival between patients with gastric cancer with limited peritoneal dissemination and/or tumour positive peritoneal cytology treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy, and those treated with gastrectomy, CRS and HIPEC after neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: In this multicentre randomised controlled two-armed phase III trial, 106 patients will be randomised (1:1) between palliative systemic chemotherapy only (standard treatment) and gastrectomy, CRS and HIPEC (experimental treatment) after 3-4 cycles of systemic chemotherapy.Patients with gastric cancer are eligible for inclusion if (1) the primary cT3-cT4 gastric tumour including regional lymph nodes is considered to be resectable, (2) limited peritoneal dissemination (Peritoneal Cancer Index < 7) and/or tumour positive peritoneal cytology are confirmed by laparoscopy or laparotomy, and (3) systemic chemotherapy was given (prior to inclusion) without disease progression. DISCUSSION: The PERISCOPE II study will determine whether gastric cancer patients with limited peritoneal dissemination and/or tumour positive peritoneal cytology treated with systemic chemotherapy, gastrectomy, CRS and HIPEC have a survival benefit over patients treated with palliative systemic chemotherapy only. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03348150 ; registration date November 2017; first enrolment November 2017; expected end date December 2022; trial status: Ongoing.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/economía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/economía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Gastrectomía/economía , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Hipertermia Inducida/economía , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Cuidados Paliativos/economía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/economía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Peritoneo/patología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias Gástricas/economía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the impact of age and comorbidity on choice and outcome of definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery. METHODS: In this population-based study, all patients with potentially curable EC (cT1N+/cT2-3, TX, any cN, cM0) diagnosed in the South East of the Netherlands between 2004 and 2014 were included. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank tests and multivariable Cox regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 702 patients was included. Age ≥ 75 years and multiple comorbidities were associated with a higher probability for dCRT (odds ratio [OR] 8.58; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.72-15.58; and OR 3.09; 95% CI 1.93-4.93). The strongest associations were found for the combination of hypertension plus diabetes (OR 3.80; 95% CI 1.97-7.32) and the combination of cardiovascular with pulmonary comorbidity (OR 3.18; 95% CI 1.57-6.46). Patients with EC who underwent dCRT had a poorer prognosis than those who underwent nCRT plus surgery, irrespective of age, number, and type of comorbidities. In contrast, for patients with squamous cell carcinoma with ≥ 2 comorbidities or age ≥ 75 years, OS was comparable between both groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52; 95% CI 0.78-2.97; and HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.13-4.14). CONCLUSIONS: Histological tumor type should be acknowledged in treatment choices for patients with esophageal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery should basically be advised as treatment of choice for operable esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. For patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with ≥ 2 comorbidities or age ≥ 75 years, dCRT may be the preferred strategy.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Quimioradioterapia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Esofagectomía/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Comorbilidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Background: Benchmarking on an international level might lead to improved outcomes at a national level. The aim of this study was to compare treatment and surgical outcome data from the Swedish National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer (NREV) and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA). Methods: All patients with primary oesophageal or gastric cancer who underwent a resection and were registered in NREV or DUCA between 2012 and 2014 were included. Differences in 30-day mortality were analysed using case mix-adjusted multivariable logistic regression. Results: In total, 4439 patients underwent oesophagectomy (2509 patients) or gastrectomy (1930 patients). Estimated resection rates were comparable. Swedish patients were older but had less advanced disease and less co-morbidity than Dutch patients. Neoadjuvant treatment rates were lower in Sweden than in the Netherlands, both for patients who underwent oesophagectomy (68·6 versus 90·0 per cent respectively; P < 0·001) and for those having gastrectomy (38·3 versus 56·6 per cent; P < 0·001). In Sweden, transthoracic oesophagectomy was performed in 94·7 per cent of patients, whereas in the Netherlands, a transhiatal approach was undertaken in 35·8 per cent. Higher annual procedural volumes per hospital were observed in the Netherlands. Adjusted 30-day and/or in-hospital mortality after gastrectomy was statistically significantly lower in Sweden than in the Netherlands (odds ratio 0·53, 95 per cent c.i. 0·29 to 0·95). Conclusion: For oesophageal and gastric cancer, there are differences in patient, tumour and treatment characteristics between Sweden and the Netherlands. Postoperative mortality in patients with gastric cancer was lower in Sweden.
Asunto(s)
Benchmarking , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/normas , Gastrectomía/normas , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomía/métodos , Esofagectomía/mortalidad , Esofagectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gastrectomía/mortalidad , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Suecia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preoperative randomization for postoperative treatment might affect quality of surgery. In the CRITICS trial (ChemoRadiotherapy after Induction chemotherapy In Cancer of the Stomach), patients were randomized before treatment to receive chemotherapy prior to a D1 + gastrectomy (removal of lymph node station (LNS) 1-9 + 11), followed by either chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In this analysis, the influence of upfront randomization on the quality of surgery was evaluated. METHODS: Quality of surgery was analyzed in both study arms using surgicopathological compliance (removal of ≥ 15 lymph nodes), surgical compliance (removal of the indicated LNS), and surgical contamination (removal of LNS that should be left in situ). Furthermore, the 'Maruyama Index of Unresected disease' (MI) was evaluated in both study arms, and validated with overall survival. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2015, 788 patients with gastric cancer were included in the CRITICS study of which 636 patients were operated with curative intent. No difference was observed between the CT and CRT group regarding surgicopathological compliance (74.8% vs 70.9%, P = 0.324), surgical compliance (43.2% vs 39.2%, P = 0.381), and surgical contamination (59.4% vs 59.9%, P = 0.567). Median MI was 1 in both groups (range CT 0-88 and CRT 0-136, P = 0.700). A MI below 5 was associated with better overall survival (CT: P = 0.009 and CRT: P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Surgical quality parameters were similar in both study arms in the CRITICS gastric cancer trial, indicating that upfront randomization for postoperative treatment had no impact on the quality of surgery. A Maruyama Index below five was associated with better overall survival.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Gastrectomía/métodos , Gastrectomía/normas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nearly one third of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for locally advanced esophageal cancer have a pathologic complete response (pCR) of the primary tumor upon histopathological evaluation of the resection specimen. The primary aim of this study is to develop a model that predicts the probability of pCR to nCRT in esophageal cancer, based on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET-CT). Accurate response prediction could lead to a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future in case of predicted pCR or additional neoadjuvant treatment in case of non-pCR. METHODS: The PRIDE study is a prospective, single arm, observational multicenter study designed to develop a multimodal prediction model for histopathological response to nCRT for esophageal cancer. A total of 200 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer - of which at least 130 patients with adenocarcinoma and at least 61 patients with squamous cell carcinoma - scheduled to receive nCRT followed by esophagectomy will be included. The primary modalities to be incorporated in the prediction model are quantitative parameters derived from MRI and 18F-FDG PET-CT scans, which will be acquired at fixed intervals before, during and after nCRT. Secondary modalities include blood samples for analysis of the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at 3 time-points (before, during and after nCRT), and an endoscopy with (random) bite-on-bite biopsies of the primary tumor site and other suspected lesions in the esophagus as well as an endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration of suspected lymph nodes after finishing nCRT. The main study endpoint is the performance of the model for pCR prediction. Secondary endpoints include progression-free and overall survival. DISCUSSION: If the multimodal PRIDE concept provides high predictive performance for pCR, the results of this study will play an important role in accurate identification of esophageal cancer patients with a pCR to nCRT. These patients might benefit from a patient-tailored approach with omission of surgery in the future. Vice versa, patients with non-pCR might benefit from additional neoadjuvant treatment, or ineffective therapy could be stopped. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The article reports on a health care intervention on human participants and was prospectively registered on March 22, 2018 under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03474341 .
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/epidemiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to provide insight in accuracy of diagnosing, current treatment and survival in patients with resectable esophageal and gastric neuroendocrine- and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC, MANEC). METHODS: All patients with esophageal or gastric (MA)NEC, who underwent surgical resection between 2006 and 2016, were identified from the Dutch national registry for histo- and cytopathology (PALGA). Patients with a neuroendocrine tumor lower than grade 3 were excluded. Data on patients, treatment and outcomes were retrieved from the patient records. Diagnosis by endoscopic biopsy was compared with diagnosis by resection specimen. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were identified in 25 hospitals, including 21 patients with esophageal (MA)NEC and 26 patients with gastric (MA)NEC on resection specimen. Biopsy diagnosis of (MA)NEC was correct in 23/27 patients. However, 20/47 patients with definitive diagnosis of (MA)NEC, were misdiagnosed on biopsy. Neoadjuvant therapy was administered in 13 (62%) esophageal (MA)NECs and 12 (46%) gastric (MA)NECs. Survival curves were similar with and without neoadjuvant therapy. One (4.8%) esophageal (MA)NEC and 4 (15%) gastric (MA)NECs died within 90 days postoperatively. For esophageal (MA)NEC the median overall survival (OS) after surgery was 37 months and 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were 71%, 50% and 35%, respectively. For gastric (MA)NEC, the median OS was 23 months and 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were 62%, 50% and 39%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Localized esophageal and gastric (MA)NEC are often misdiagnosed on endoscopic biopsies. After resection, long-term survival was achieved in respectively 35% and 39% of patients.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Anciano , Biopsia , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/mortalidad , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Clasificación del Tumor , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the association between hospital volume and quality of gastric cancer surgery are lacking. In the present study, the effect of hospital volume on quality of gastric cancer surgery was evaluated by analysing data from the CRITICS (ChemoRadiotherapy after Induction chemotherapy In Cancer of the Stomach) trial. METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent in the Netherlands were selected from the CRITICS trial database. Annual hospital volume of participating centres was derived from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Hospital volume was categorized into very low (1-10 gastrectomies per year per institution), low (11-20), medium (21-30) and high (31 or more), and linked to the CRITICS database. Quality of surgery was analysed by surgicopathological compliance (removal of at least 15 lymph nodes), surgical compliance (removal of indicated lymph node stations) and the Maruyama Index. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were also compared between hospital categories. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2015, 788 patients were included in the CRITICS study, of whom 494 were analysed. Surgicopathological compliance was higher (86·7 versus 50·4 per cent; P < 0·001), surgical compliance was greater (52·9 versus 19·8 per cent; P < 0·001) and median Maruyama Index was lower (0 versus 6; P = 0·006) in high-volume hospitals compared with very low-volume hospitals. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative complications or mortality between the hospital volume categories. CONCLUSION: Surgery performed in high-volume hospitals was associated with better surgical quality than surgery carried out in lower-volume hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Gastrectomía/normas , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/normas , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Initial staging of gastric cancer consists of computed tomography (CT) and gastroscopy. In locally advanced (cT3-4) gastric cancer, fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with CT (FDG-PET/CT or PET) and staging laparoscopy (SL) may have a role in staging, but evidence is scarce. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness of PET and SL in addition to initial staging in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: This prospective observational cohort study will include all patients with a surgically resectable, advanced gastric adenocarcinoma (cT3-4b, N0-3, M0), that are scheduled for treatment with curative intent after initial staging with gastroscopy and CT. The modalities to be investigated in this study is the addition of PET and SL. The primary outcome of this study is the proportion of patients in whom the PET or SL lead to a change in treatment strategy. Secondary outcome parameters are: diagnostic performance, morbidity and mortality, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness of these additional diagnostic modalities. The study recently started in August 2017 with a duration of 36 months. At least 239 patients need to be included in this study to demonstrate that the diagnostic modalities are break-even. Based on the annual number of gastrectomies in the participating centers, it is estimated that approximately 543 patients are included in this study. DISCUSSION: In this study, it is hypothesized that performing PET and SL for locally advanced gastric adenocarcinomas results in a change of treatment strategy in 27% of patients and an annual cost-reduction in the Netherlands of 916.438 in this patient group by reducing futile treatment. The results of this study may be applicable to all countries with comparable treatment algorithms and health care systems. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03208621 . This trial was registered prospectively on June 30, 2017.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Flujo de TrabajoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In order to determine the optimal combination of perioperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for Western patients with advanced resectable gastric cancer, the international multicentre CRITICS trial (ChemoRadiotherapy after Induction chemotherapy In Cancer of the Stomach) was initiated. In this trial, patients with resectable gastric cancer were randomised before start of treatment between adjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus gastric cancer resection. The purpose of this study was to report on surgical morbidity and mortality in this trial, and to identify factors associated with surgical morbidity. METHODS: Patients who underwent a gastrectomy with curative intent were selected. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess risk factors for developing postoperative complications. RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2015, 788 patients were included in the CRITICS trial, of whom 636 patients were eligible for current analyses. Complications occurred in 296 patients (47%). Postoperative mortality was 2.2% (n = 14). Complications due to anastomotic leakage was cause of death in 5 patients. Failure to complete preoperative chemotherapy (OR = 2.09, P = 0.004), splenectomy (OR = 2.82, P = 0.012), and male sex (OR = 1.55, P = 0.020) were associated with a greater risk for postoperative complications. Total gastrectomy and oesophago-cardia resection were associated with greater risk for morbidity compared with subtotal gastrectomy (OR = 1.88, P = 0.001 and OR = 1.89, P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Compared to other Western studies, surgical morbidity in the CRITICS trial was slightly higher whereas mortality was low. Complications following anastomotic leakage was the most important factor for postoperative mortality. Important proxies for developing postoperative complications were failure to complete preoperative chemotherapy, splenectomy, male sex, total gastrectomy, and oesophago-cardia resection.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Gastrectomía , Mortalidad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Epirrubicina/administración & dosificación , Esofagectomía , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Modelos Logísticos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , EsplenectomíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of these studies was to examine the influence of hospital of diagnosis on the probability of receiving curative treatment and its impact on survival among oesophageal and gastric cancer. DESIGN: Although oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery is centralised in the Netherlands, the disease is often diagnosed in hospitals that do not perform this procedure. METHOD: Patients with potentially curable oesophageal or gastric cancer tumours diagnosed between 2005 and 2013 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The probability to undergo curative treatment was examined for each hospital of diagnosis after adjustment for case-mix. Effects of variation in probability of undergoing curative treatment among these hospitals on survival were investigated Cox regression. RESULTS: All 13,017 patients with potentially curable oesophageal and 5,620 patients with potentially curable gastric cancer, diagnosed in 91 hospitals, were included. After adjustment, the proportion of oesophageal cancer patients receiving curative treatment ranged from 50% to 82% and from 48% to 78% for patients with gastric cancer in 2010-2013, depending on hospital of diagnosis (both P < 0.001). Furthermore, patients diagnosed in hospitals with a low probability of undergoing curative treatment had a worse overall survival in the period 2010-2013 (oesophageal cancer hazard ratio (HR): 1,15; 95%-CI: 1,07-1,24; gastric cancer HR: 1,21; 95%-CI: 1,04-1,41). CONCLUSION: The variation in probability of undergoing potentially curative treatment for oesophageal and gastric cancer between hospitals of diagnosis and its impact on survival indicates that treatment decision-making for these patients may be improved. Regional expert multidisciplinary team meetings in this field may improve the selection of patients for curative treatment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Anciano , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Probabilidad , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dutch national guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer recommend the use of perioperative chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy is often not administered. The aim of this study was to evaluate hospital variation on the probability to receive adjuvant chemotherapy and to identify associated factors with special attention to postoperative complications. METHODS: All patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent an elective surgical resection for stage IB-IVa (M0) gastric adenocarcinoma between 2011 and 2015 were identified from a national database (Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit). A multivariable linear mixed model was used to evaluate case-mix adjusted hospital variation and to identify factors associated with adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: Of all surgically treated gastric cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 882), 68% received adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. After adjusting for case-mix and random variation, a large hospital variation in the administration rates for adjuvant was observed (OR range 0.31-7.1). In multivariable analysis, weight loss, a poor health status and failure of neoadjuvant chemotherapy completion were strongly associated with an increased likelihood of adjuvant therapy omission. Patients with severe postoperative complications had a threefold increased likelihood of adjuvant therapy omission (OR 3.07 95% CI 2.04-4.65). CONCLUSION: Despite national guidelines, considerable hospital variation was observed in the probability of receiving adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. Postoperative complications were strongly associated with adjuvant chemo(radio)therapy omission, underlining the need to further reduce perioperative morbidity in gastric cancer surgery.