Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neth J Med ; 78(2): 83-86, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332173

RESUMEN

This case report presents a patient with vasculitis as a presenting symptom of type I cryoglobulinaemia due to lymphoproliferative disease. This is an uncommon cause of vasculitis, but important to recognise, as it influences treatment decisions. We discuss the differential diagnosis and extensive diagnostic approach of vasculitis. Above all, this case emphasizes that even a limited quantity of paraproteins can cause severe symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Crioglobulinemia/diagnóstico , Vasculitis/diagnóstico , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/diagnóstico , Anciano , Crioglobulinemia/etiología , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Vasculitis/etiología , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenström/complicaciones
2.
Endoscopy ; 41(7): 603-9, 2009 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19588288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastrointestinal endoscopy investigations are frequently requested by gastroenterologists, general practitioners and other physicians. In addition to the classic methods of report writing, several electronic endoscopic report systems are currently available. The aim of the study was to evaluate the costs of three different ways of producing reports; by hand, by dictation, or by computer. METHODS: Three methods of report writing were compared, with special attention to costs. The endoscopy process was analyzed, from arrival of the patient to sending the report to the referring doctor, and including production of endoscopic images or video, logging of used endoscopes and their disinfection, and storage costs for endoscopy data. RESULTS: During the first 5 years, the mean costs per procedure were Euro 4.78 for handwritten, Euro 6.39 for dictated and Euro 8.90 for computerized reports. Due to depreciation, after this initial period, the respective costs declined to Euro 4.37, Euro 5.20 and Euro 5.13, respectively. Despite high initial costs, a cost-benefit analysis already revealed a financial benefit from a computerized system after 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The electronic production of an endoscopic report turned out to be the most expensive way of report writing during the first 5 years, due to high initial costs. After 5 years the costs of the different systems were comparable with each other. Cost-benefit analysis showed a positive financial benefit for computerized reports after 3 years.


Asunto(s)
Costos Directos de Servicios , Endoscopía/economía , Control de Formularios y Registros/economía , Control de Formularios y Registros/métodos , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Inversiones en Salud , Países Bajos , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA