One decade of point-prevalence surveys for carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacterales: whole genome sequencing based prevalence and genetic characterization in a large Dutch teaching hospital from 2013 to 2022.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence, trends, and potential nosocomial transmission events of the hidden reservoir of rectal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E). METHODS: From 2013 to 2022, yearly point prevalence surveys were conducted in a large Dutch teaching hospital. On the day of the survey, all admitted patients were screened for ESBL-E rectal carriage using peri-anal swabs and a consistent and sensitive selective culturing method. All Enterobacterales phenotypically suspected of ESBL production were analysed using whole genome sequencing for ESBL gene detection and clonal relatedness analysis. RESULTS: On average, the ESBL-E prevalence was 4.6% (188/4,119 patients), ranging from 2.1 to 6.6% per year. The ESBL-prevalence decreased on average 5.5% per year. After time trend correction, the prevalence in 2016 and 2020 was lower compared to the other year. Among the ESBL-E, Escherichia coli (80%) and CTX-M genes (85%) predominated. Potential nosocomial transmission events could be found in 5.9% (11/188) of the ESBL-E carriers. CONCLUSIONS: The ESBL-E rectal carriage prevalence among hospitalized patients was 4.6% with a downward trend from 2013 to 2022. The decrease in ESBL-E prevalence in 2020 could have been due to the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent countrywide measures as no nosocomial transmission events were detected in 2020. However, the persistently low ESBL-E prevalences in 2021 and 2022 suggest that the decline in ESBL-E prevalence goes beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, indicating that overall ESBL-E carriage rates are declining over time. Continuous monitoring of ESBL-E prevalence and transmission rates can aid infection control policy to keep antibiotic resistance rates in hospitals low.

Performance of the Diasorin SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay on the LIAISON XL.

BACKGROUND: The current reference standard to diagnose a SARS-CoV-2 infection is real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). This test poses substantial challenges for large-scale community testing, especially with respect to the long turnaround times. SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests are an alternative, but typically use a lateral flow assay format rendering them less suitable for analysis of large numbers of samples. METHODS: We conducted an evaluation of the Diasorin SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay (DAA) compared to real-time RT-PCR (Abbott). The study was performed on 248 (74 qRT-PCR positive, 174 qRT-PCR negative) clinical combined oro-nasopharyngeal samples of individuals with COVID-19-like symptoms obtained at a Municipal Health Service test centre. In addition, we evaluated the analytical performance of DAA with a 10-fold dilution series of SARS-CoV-2 containing culture supernatant and compared it with the lateral flow assay SARS-CoV-2 Roche/SD Biosensor Rapid Antigen test (RRA). RESULTS: The DAA had an overall specificity of 100% (95%CI 97.9%-100%) and sensitivity of 73% (95%CI 61.3%-82.7%) for the clinical samples. Sensitivity was 86% (CI95% 74.6%-93.3%) for samples with Ct-value below 30. Both the DAA and RRA detected SARS-CoV-2 up to a dilution containing 5.2 × 102 fifty-percent-tissue-culture-infective-dose (TCID50)/ml. DISCUSSION: The DAA performed adequately for clinical samples with a Ct-value below 30. Test performance may be further optimised by lowering the relative light unit (RLU) threshold for positivity assuming the in this study used pre-analytical protocol . The test has potential for use as a diagnostic assay for symptomatic community-dwelling individuals early after disease onset in the context of disease control.

[The first 29 COVID-19-patients in a clinic: early experiences from a Dutch hospital]. / De eerste 29 COVID-19-patiënten in de kliniek.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19 disease is of pandemic proportions and reached the Netherlands on February 27 2020. Here we present the first Dutch cohort of 29 hospitalized patients during the first two weeks of the epidemic in the Netherlands. Demographic characteristics of patients, clinical presentation and course of disease up to the moment of analysis showed similarity with what has been described in Chinese and Italian literature. However the higher proportion of patients presenting with gastro-intestinal symptoms and the high number of patients with overweight and obesity stood out. Based on the experience in our hospital very early on in the epidemic COVID-19 impresses as a severe illness with risk of acute respiratory deterioration.

Added diagnostic value of broad-range 16S PCR on periprosthetic tissue and clinical specimens from other normally sterile body sites.

AIMS: Evaluation of 16S PCR in addition to the standard culture to improve the pathogen detection rate in clinical specimens. METHODS AND RESULTS: Microbiological culture and direct 16S PCR was performed on specimens from suspected prosthetic joint infection patients (cohort-1) and on tissues and fluids from other normally sterile body sites (cohort-2). Based on clinical and microbiological data, the detection rate for both methods was assessed, assuming no superiority of either 16S PCR or culture. In cohort-1, 469 specimens were obtained. Culture was positive in 170 (36·2%) specimens, 16S PCR detected 70 (41·2%) of those pathogens. Additionally, 16S PCR detected pathogens in 13 of 299 (4·3%) culture-negative specimens. In cohort-2, pathogens were cultured in 52 of 430 (12·1%) specimens and 16S PCR revealed those pathogens in 32 (61·5%) specimens. 16S PCR detected pathogens in 31 of 378 (8·2%) culture-negative specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the yield with 16S PCR was low. For cohort-1 16S PCR detected pathogens in 4·3% of culture-negative specimens, where this was 8·2% for cohort-2. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Although direct 16S PCR cannot replace culture, it may offer a valuable additional diagnostic option for detection of difficult to culture micro-organisms in culture-negative clinical specimens.

Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) polymerase chain reaction assay on rectal swabs and enrichment broth for detection of ESBL carriage.

BACKGROUND: Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) screening and contact precautions on patients at high risk for ESBL carriage are considered important infection control measures. Since contact precautions are costly and may negatively impact patient care, rapid exclusion of ESBL carriage and therefore earlier discontinuation of contact precautions are desired. AIM: In the present study, the performance of an ESBL polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting blaCTX-M genes was evaluated as a screening assay for ESBL carriage. METHODS: Two methods were assessed: PCR performed directly on rectal swabs and PCR on enrichment broth after incubation overnight. The reference standard was culture of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae on selective agar after overnight enrichment and confirmation by the combination disc diffusion method. Microarray was used for discrepancy analysis. A secondary analysis was performed to evaluate the added value of including a blaSHV target in the PCR. FINDINGS: A total of 551 rectal swabs from 385 patients were included, of which 28 (5%) were ESBL positive in culture. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 86%, 98%, 67%, and 99%, respectively, for PCR directly on swabs, and 96%, 98%, 75%, and 100%, respectively, for PCR on enrichment broth. Adding a blaSHV target to the assay resulted in a lower PPV without increasing the sensitivity and NPV. CONCLUSION: Screening for ESBL by PCR directly on rectal swabs has a high negative predictive value, is up to 48h faster than traditional culture and therefore facilitates earlier discontinuation of contact precautions, thereby improving patient care and saving valuable resources in the hospital.

Rapid clearance of Giardia lamblia DNA from the gut after successful treatment.

To assess the time it takes for a real-time PCR to become negative after treatment of a Giardia lamblia infection, we evaluated two consecutive follow-up samples from 75 infected patients. Approximately 1 week after treatment all samples tested negative, indicating rapid clearance of parasitic DNA after successful treatment.