Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Tijdschr Psychiatr ; 66(1): 36-41, 2024.
Artículo en Holandés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38380486

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To promote quality improvement in Dutch mental health care, it is imperative to line up methods of quality improvement with daily care practice. In value-based healthcare the joint vision of medical professionals and patients is leading in the design and execution of care improvements. AIM: To demonstrate the value of value-based care. METHOD: Description of a practical example of the application of value based healthcare in mental healthcare, including a practical example of value-based improvement of patient care. RESULTS: A multidisciplinary improvement team was formed, consisting of patients and employees who were involved in the depression care pathway. The team determined important outcomes of care from the patient’s perspective, and successfully executed several improvement initiatives. CONCLUSION: The bottom-up approach of value-based healthcare is in line with day-to-day care practice and provides opportunities for effectively improving the quality of mental health care.


Asunto(s)
Salud Mental , Atención Médica Basada en Valor , Humanos , Atención a la Salud
2.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 69: 104461, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36563595

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Currently, outcomes of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are not standardized and it is unclear which outcomes matter most to people living with MS. A consensus between patients and healthcare professionals on which outcomes to measure and how, would facilitate a move towards value-based MS care. OBJECTIVE: to develop an internationally accepted, patient-relevant Standard Outcome Set for MS (S.O.S.MS). METHODS: A mixed-method design was used, including a systematic literature review, four patient focus groups (n=30) and a RAND-modified Delphi process with seventeen MS experts of five disciplines from seven countries (the Netherlands, United States of America, Portugal, Ireland, India, New Zealand, Switzerland and Turkey). RESULTS: A standard outcome set for MS was defined, consisting of fourteen outcomes divided in four domains: disease activity (n=3), symptoms (n=4), functional status (n=6), and quality of life (n=1). For each outcome, an outcome measure was selected and the measurement protocol was defined. In addition, seven case-mix variables were selected. CONCLUSION: This standard outcome set provides a guideline for measuring outcomes of MS in clinical practice and research. Using this set to monitor and (inter)nationally benchmark real-world outcomes of MS can support improvement of patient value and ultimately guide the transition towards value-based MS care.


Asunto(s)
Esclerosis Múltiple , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Atención Dirigida al Paciente
3.
Mult Scler Int ; 2020: 5463451, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32607256

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recently, ocrelizumab (Ocrevus®) was approved for the treatment of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) based on data from the ORATORIO clinical trial. Real-world data about the clinical effectiveness of ocrelizumab has yet to be gathered. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide data about the clinical effectiveness of ocrelizumab for patients diagnosed with PPMS in a real-world setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients with PPMS who started ocrelizumab treatment (n = 21) in St. Antonius Hospital (Utrecht/Nieuwegein, the Netherlands) between April 2018 and December 31, 2018. Primary outcome was pre- versus post-ocrelizumab disability worsening rate (from 96 weeks prior to first ocrelizumab administration up to 24 weeks post first ocrelizumab administration). RESULTS: Disability worsening rate while on treatment significantly differed (lower) from disability worsening rate in pre-treatment period (Z = -2.81, p ≤ .01). Three out of 17 patients showed a clinically relevant improvement in disability status after treatment start. CONCLUSION: Ocrelizumab can stabilize disability progression in patients with PPMS. Some patients even showed a clinically relevant improvement in disability status. Further research should help to identify which patients benefit most from ocrelizumab.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA