SAFESTEREO: phase II randomized trial to compare stereotactic radiosurgery with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a frequently chosen treatment for patients with brain metastases and the number of long-term survivors is increasing. Brain necrosis (e.g. radionecrosis) is the most important long-term side effect of the treatment. Retrospective studies show a lower risk of radionecrosis and local tumor recurrence after fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS, e.g. five fractions) compared with stereotactic radiosurgery in one or three fractions. This is especially true for patients with large brain metastases. As such, the 2022 ASTRO guideline of radiotherapy for brain metastases recommends more research to fSRS to reduce the risk of radionecrosis. This multicenter prospective randomized study aims to determine whether the incidence of adverse local events (either local failure or radionecrosis) can be reduced using fSRS versus SRS in one or three fractions in patients with brain metastases. METHODS: Patients are eligible with one or more brain metastases from a solid primary tumor, age of 18 years or older, and a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70. Exclusion criteria include patients with small cell lung cancer, germinoma or lymphoma, leptomeningeal metastases, a contraindication for MRI, prior inclusion in this study, prior surgery for brain metastases, prior radiotherapy for the same brain metastases (in-field re-irradiation). Participants will be randomized between SRS with a dose of 15-24 Gy in 1 or 3 fractions (standard arm) or fSRS 35 Gy in five fractions (experimental arm). The primary endpoint is the incidence of a local adverse event (local tumor failure or radionecrosis identified on MRI scans) at two years after treatment. Secondary endpoints are salvage treatment and the use of corticosteroids, bevacizumab, or antiepileptic drugs, survival, distant brain recurrences, toxicity, and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Currently, limiting the risk of adverse events such as radionecrosis is a major challenge in the treatment of brain metastases. fSRS potentially reduces this risk of radionecrosis and local tumor failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov, trial registration number: NCT05346367 , trial registration date: 26 April 2022.

Optimal image guided radiation therapy strategy for organs at risk sparing in radiotherapy of the prostate including pelvic lymph nodes.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Purpose of this study was to quantify the OAR dose for different position correction strategies, and to determine which strategy is most optimal for treating patients on the prostate and pelvic lymph nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 30 patients, four different treatment plans were made reflecting different correction strategies: online correction on bony anatomy; offline correction on bony anatomy; online correction on the prostate fiducials; using 1 cm margins around both CTVs. The dose to the PTVs and OARs was quantified and a pairwise statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed in the dose to the PTVs, ensuring that any OAR sparing is not caused by differences in PTV coverage. Dose to the rectum and anal canal was lowest when applying an online correction on prostate fiducials, although the total PTV volume was higher. Dose to the small bowel bag and femoral heads was slightly higher compared to online correction on bony structures, but well within clinically acceptable limits. CONCLUSION: Although the total PTV volume is higher when applying an online correction on the prostate, this strategy leads to the most optimal sparing of relevant OARs, at the cost of a slightly higher dose to the femoral heads and small bowel bag.

A comprehensive evaluation of treatment accuracy, including end-to-end tests and clinical data, applied to intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A methodology is presented to quantify the uncertainty associated with linear accelerator-based frameless intracranial stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) combining end-to-end phantom tests and clinical data. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The following steps of the SRT chain were analysed: planning computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) scans registration, target volume delineation, CT and cone beam CT (CBCT) registration and intrafraction-patient displacement. The overall accuracy was established with an end-to-end test. The measured uncertainties were combined, deriving the total systematic (ΣT) and random (σT) error components, to estimate the GTV-PTV margin. RESULTS: The uncertainty in the MR-CT registration was on average 0.40mm (averaged over AP, CC and LR directions). Rotational variations were smaller than 0.5° in all directions. Interobser variation in GTV delineation was on average 0.29mm. The uncertainty in the CBCT-CT registration was on average 0.15mm. Again, rotational variations were smaller than 0.5° in all directions. The systematic and random intrafraction displacement errors were on average 0.55mm and 0.45mm, respectively. The systematic and random positional errors from the end-to-end test were on average 0.49mm and 0.53mm, respectively. Combining these uncertainties resulted in an average ΣT=0.9mm and σT=0.7mm and an average GTV-PTV margin of 2.8mm. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive methodology including end-to-end tests enabled a GTV-PTV margin calculation considering all sources of uncertainties. This generic method can also be used for other treatment sites.

Mapping of resection margins of oral cancer for p53 overexpression and chromosome instability to detect residual (pre)malignant cells.

Oral squamous cell cancers (OSCCs) have a high local recurrence rate, partly due to problems in the recognition of minimal residual disease. The use of molecular markers is shown to increase the sensitivity of detection of residual malignant cells in tumour margins of OSCC. p53 immunohistochemistry was combined with in situ hybridization for chromosomes 1 and 7 to determine the presence of genetically unstable cells in resection specimens of OSCC containing invasive cancer. An increased frequency of genetically aberrant cells was observed, as detected by p53 overexpression and/or aneusomy, with histological progression of normal mucosa via hyperplasia to dysplasia. Of clinical importance was the finding that 11 of 20 resection margins, all of which were initially diagnosed as being tumour-free, were found to contain genetically aberrant (pre)malignant cells. In these areas, closer histological examination of the genetically aberrant compartment within these margins often also revealed small dysplastic areas that were missed in the initial diagnosis, showing that this genetic approach can assist in diagnosis.

Pain characteristics help to predict the analgesic efficacy of radiotherapy for the treatment of cancer pain.

It is recognised that radiotherapy provides relief for intractable pain in approximately 50% of patients with cancer pain. Unfortunately, traditional explanatory variables, such as age, gender, histology or radiation dose, do not help to predict which individuals will benefit from palliative radiotherapy. A non-randomised prospective clinical trial was conducted on 51 patients to evaluate the value of pain characteristics as new explanatory variables for predicting the efficacy of palliative radiotherapy for providing cancer pain relief. Two new explanatory variables were identified: the presence of radiating pain and the pain score before radiotherapy.