RESUMEN
Epilepsy is a complex and common neurological disorder characterized by spontaneous and recurrent seizures, affecting ~75 million individuals worldwide. Numerous studies have been conducted to develop new pharmacological drugs for the effective treatment of epilepsy. In recent years, numerous experimental and clinical studies have focused on the role of the adrenergic receptor (AR) system in the regulation of epileptogenesis, seizure susceptibility and convulsions. α1-ARs (α1A, α1B and α1D), α2-ARs (α2A, α2B and α2C) and ß-ARs (ß1, ß2 and ß3), known to have convulsant or anticonvulsant effects, have been isolated. Norepinephrine (NE), the key endogenous agonist of ARs, is considered to play a crucial role in the pathophysiology of epileptic seizures. However, the effects of NE on different ARs have not been fully elucidated. Although the activation of some AR subtypes produces conflicting results, the activation of α1, α2 and ß receptor subtypes, in particular, produces anticonvulsant effects. The present review focuses on NE and ARs involved in epileptic seizure formation and discusses therapeutic approaches.
RESUMEN
Cardiac disease is marked by sympathoexcitation and elevated levels of noradrenaline (NA) and cotransmitter neuropeptide Y (NPY). Increased NPY levels are associated with a greater risk of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality. Nonetheless, the factors that cause NPY release remain poorly understood. We hypothesized that circulating catecholamines might lead to NPY release from myocardial sympathetic nerve terminals via a ß-receptor-mediated mechanism that enhances sympathoexcitation. Ventricular interstitial NA and NPY levels were measured in six Yorkshire pigs after i.v. administration of NA (1 mg) and before and after propranolol infusion (1 mg/kg). Real-time interstitial NPY levels were measured using ventricular capacitive immunoprobes (CIs) affixed with NPY antibodies and quantified as the change in CI input current (INPY ) upon binding of NPY. Interstitial NA was measured with adjacent fast-scan cyclic voltammetry probes (INA ). A left ventricular pressure catheter and continuous ECGs were used for haemodynamic recordings, and an epicardial 56-electrode sock was used for measurements of activation recovery interval, a surrogate of action potential duration. Upon administration of NA, heart rate and left ventricular pressure increased, and activation recovery interval shortened. Notably, NA significantly increased interstitial myocardial NPY levels. After propranolol, changes in heart rate and activation recovery interval were largely mitigated. The INA increased to a similar extent post-propranolol vs. pre-propranolol, but changes in INPY were significantly reduced post-propranolol. Coronary sinus plasma analyses confirmed fast-scan cyclic voltammetry and CI findings. Hence, this study demonstrates that circulating NA induces NPY release from ventricular sympathetic nerve terminals, the mechanism for which is mediated via ß-adrenergic receptors and can be blocked by the non-selective ß-blocker, propranolol. KEY POINTS: Cardiovascular disease is characterized by sympathovagal imbalance, with increased plasma noradrenaline (NA) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) concentrations. Increased NPY levels are associated with increased ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in heart failure. Limited data are available on the specific factors that cause NPY release. In this study, fast-scan cyclic voltammetry and capacitive immunoprobes were used to allow for real-time in vivo measurements of interstitial myocardial neurotransmitters and neuropeptides, respectively. Using an in vivo porcine model with cardiac fast-scan cyclic voltammetry and capacitive immunoprobes, it was shown that systemic NA can increase ventricular interstitial NPY levels, suggesting that NA induces NPY release from postganglionic sympathetic nerves. The release of NPY was blocked by administration of the non-selective ß-blocker propranolol, suggesting that release of NPY is dependent on activation of ß-adrenergic receptors by NA.
RESUMEN
Memories of adverse events can be maladaptive when they lead to exaggerated fear, as observed in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Fear conditioning and fear sensitization are learning processes thought to play a role in fear-related disorders, and only few animal studies have evaluated the relationship between the associative and non-associative fear memory components on the development and maintenance of PTSD-like behavioral changes. Here we assessed the effects of a single dose of propranolol (10 mg/kg) or saline after fear memory retrieval on the long-term behavioral responses induced by severe stress in male rats. Animals were submitted to contextual fear conditioning (delayed shock group) or not (non-shock group) and underwent fear memory retrieval followed by propranolol or saline administration two weeks later. Rats were then evaluated in different behavioral tests to assess the expression of the conditioned fear response, anxiety-like and exploratory behaviors, and fear response after the presentation of unknown acoustic stimulus. Post-retrieval propranolol did not disrupt the subsequent expression of neither conditioned fear response nor the exploratory deficit and fear sensitization response, indicating that propranolol failed to mitigate long-term behavioral changes induced by severe stress in rats.