Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the elderly: 5-Year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Older adults remain active for longer and continue sports and activities that require rotation on one leg later in life. The rate of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears is therefore increasing in those over 40 years old, with an associated increase in the rate of surgical reconstruction (ACLR), but there is limited literature on its effectiveness. Our aim was to compare the outcomes of elderly patients who have undergone ACLR with those of a younger group of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent ACLR with bone-patella tendon-bone grafting (BPTB) at a level I trauma center between 2015 and 2017 were included in the study with a 5-year follow-up. Patients were divided into 4 groups: below 40 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years and over 60 years. The graft function was evaluated by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Objective Score, the anteroposterior (AP) displacement was measured by arthrometer (KT-1000; MEDMetric) and the Lysholm scale was used for subjective evaluation. RESULTS: 195 patients were included in the final analysis. The IKDC score showed significantly poorer scores in the 50-59 years and over 60 years group than in the younger groups, however in 83 % and 66 % of cases reached normal or nearly normal grades, respectively. A significant difference was found in the knee AP displacement (measured in mm) between the below 40 years group and 50-59 years as well as over 60 years old groups; however, the number of graft failure (laxity >5 mm) and elongation (>3 mm) did not increased in these senior groups. The patient-reported Lysholm scores in the 40-49 years, 50-59 years and 60 years groups was lower than in the below 40 years group, but the average score was "good". CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results of ACL reconstruction in older athletes are comparable to those of younger patients, both in terms of knee function and patient satisfaction. Furthermore, there is no difference in outcomes for older patients over the age of 40 compared to those in their 50 s or even 60 s. There is still insufficient published evidence to define an upper age limit for ACL reconstruction in older athletes.

Synthetic Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery in Professional Female Handball Players-A Viable Option?

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACR) rupture is a frequent injury in professional sports players. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including 41 professional female handball players, undergoing ACR reconstruction surgery, using a Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) graft (n = 12) or a Soft Tissue (ST) graft (n = 29). After return-to-play, the patients were asked to take a survey, reporting subjective and objective performance indexes before the injury and after return-to-play. Time from surgery to first practice and to return-to-play were significantly shorter in the LARS group (3.92 ± 1.14 vs. 6.93 ± 2.19 months, p < 0.001 and 4.71 ± 1.2 vs. 8.81 ± 2.9, respectively). While there was no difference between postoperative mean time on court, number of goals/match, number of matches played at 6 months return-to-play and 50 m, 100 m and gate-to-gate sprint times, there was a significantly greater increase in preoperative times in the ST group than in the LARS group (1.45 ± 1.05 s vs. 0.21 ± 0.58 s slower than preoperatively, p < 0.001 for 50 m; 1.09 ± 0.95 s vs. 0.08 ± 1 s, p = 0.01 for 100 m; 1.66 ± 1 s vs. 0.21 ± 0.66 s for gate-to-gate). In conclusion, LARS grafts provide a faster recovery time and better functional outcome, significantly impacting the performance of professional handball players.

Clinical Outcomes of a Novel Hybrid Transtibial Technique for Femoral Tunnel Drilling in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Large Single-Center Case Series With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Background: A novel hybrid transtibial (HTT) approach to femoral tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been developed that circumvents the need for knee hyperflexion and orients the graft in the most anatomic position without sacrificing the tunnel length or aperture. Hypothesis: Patients who underwent ACLR utilizing the HTT technique would achieve excellent patient-reported outcome scores and experience low rates of graft failure and reoperations. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent primary ACLR at a single institution between 2005 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients treated with the HTT, anteromedial portal (AMP), and transtibial (TT) approaches were matched based on age, sex, and body mass index ±3 kg/m2. Demographic and surgical data as well as femoral tunnel angle measurements on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were collected for the 3 groups. However, clinical outcomes were only reported for the HTT group because of concerns of graft heterogeneity. Results: A total of 170 patients (median age, 26.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 18.0-35.0 years]) who underwent ACLR using the HTT approach were included. The median coronal- and sagittal-plane femoral tunnel angles were 47° (IQR, 42°-53°) and 40° (IQR, 34°-46°), respectively. The sagittal-plane femoral tunnel angles in the HTT group were significantly more horizontal compared with those in the TT group (P < .0001), whereas the coronal-plane femoral tunnel angles in the HTT group were found to be significantly more vertical compared with those in the AMP group (P = .001) and more horizontal compared with those in the TT group (P < .0001). The graft failure and reoperation rates in the HTT group at a minimum 2-year follow-up were 1.8% (3/170) and 4.7% (8/170), respectively. The complication rate was 6.5% (11/170), with the most common complication being subjective stiffness in 7 patients. The median Lysholm score was 89.5 (IQR, 79.0-98.0); the median International Knee Documentation Committee score was 83.9 (IQR, 65.5-90.8); and the median Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey physical and mental component summary scores were 55.0 (IQR, 52.6-55.9) and 56.2 (IQR, 49.1-59.3), respectively. Conclusion: ACLR using the HTT technique was associated with low graft retear and revision surgery rates and good patient-reported outcome scores at medium-term follow-up and demonstrated femoral tunnel obliquity on postoperative radiographs that correlated with optimal parameters previously reported in cadaveric and biomechanical studies.

The effectiveness of quadrupled semitendinosus graft technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A network meta-analysis assessing various graft preparation techniques.

PURPOSE: This study aims to perform a network meta-analysis of hamstring graft preparation techniques to enhance anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction guidelines and inform clinical decision-making in patients with primary ACL rupture. METHODS: A review of the literature, from 1 January 1990, to 31 August 2023, was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, focusing on the clinical outcomes of various hamstring graft preparation techniques. Forty-six studies (over 4800 knees) were analysed. Eight graft compositions: doubled hamstring (ST/G)-1978 grafts, doubled hamstring with augmentation (ST/G+A)-586 grafts, tripled semitendinosus (3ST)-124 grafts, quadrupled semitendinosus (4ST)-1273 grafts, five-strand tripled semitendinosus + doubled gracilis (3ST/2GR-839 grafts, six-strand tripled semitendinosus + tripled gracilis (3ST/3GR)-335 grafts, seven-strand quadrupled semitendinosus + tripled gracilis (4ST/3GR)-11 grafts and ≥eight strands-24 grafts were compared, considering graft sizes, laxity, muscle strength, range-of-motion, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sport (RTS) and adverse events. RESULTS: The 4ST grafts fared better than the ST/G grafts in the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Sport, KOOS Q and RTS (mean difference [MD], -1.69; p = 0.0159; MD, -1.55; p = 0.0325; MD, -1.93; p = 0.001; odds ratio: 3.13; p < 0.0001). The IKDC differed significantly between the 4ST and ST/G+A groups (MD, 1.88; p = 0.046). The ST/G+A resulted in the lowest knee laxity, surpassing the ST/G, 3ST and 4ST. The ST/G had the smallest diameter (ST/G vs. ST/G+A: MD, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-1.86, p < 0.0001). Reduced failure rates were noted with the 3ST/2GR (3ST/2GR vs. ST/G: MD, 6.93; p = 0.009) and 3ST/3GR (3ST/3GR vs. ST/G: MD, 53.64; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The ideal hamstring graft for ACLR should be individualized. A 4ST graft is likely to yield good PROMs. For high stability and rapid RTS, adding augmentation to the graft is advisable. The ST/G is the thinnest graft possible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Network meta-analysis of level I-III studies.

Hop distance to body height ratio outperforms limb symmetry index in predicting second anterior cruciate ligament injury.

PURPOSE: The ability of current return-to-sport (RTS) tests to predict second anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries (ACLI) in athletes with a history of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is unclear. This study aimed to prospectively assess the risk of a second ACLI by identifying the most significant deviation in hop test results in professional athletes after ACLR compared to healthy peers. METHODS: A total of 30 professional athletes with a history of ACLR and 30 healthy professional athletes participated in this study. Participants performed 10 functional hop tests, and the subsequent limb symmetry index (LSI) was compared between the groups. After a 3-year follow-up, the re-injury rate was assessed among the ACLR group. Fourteen ACLR athletes who sustained a second ACLI were included and matched with 14 controls from the healthy group. The LSI and the hop distance to body height percentage (D/H) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Statistical analyses confirmed a significant decrease in LSI in the ACLR group compared to the healthy group in the triple hop for distance (p = .023). In re-injured ACLR athletes, seven different hop tests showed a significant decrease in the D/H index compared to the healthy controls. Meanwhile, for LSI, only the triple cross-over hop for distance (p = .045) showed a significant increase in the healthy group. CONCLUSION: Before clearing athletes for RTS, assessing functional hop test results using the hop distance to body height ratio, aligned with normative data from healthy controls, could further enhance the prediction of reduced graft rupture risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and risk of meniscus injury: Exploring the safest delay interval.

Purpose: The duration for which anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can be delayed without resulting in a risk of subsequent meniscus injury has remained a debatable topic. The main purpose of this study was to determine the safest delay interval for a delayed ACLR. Methods: This retrospective study included all patients who underwent ACLR between January 2020 and January 2022. The patients were divided into four groups based on the delay interval: <3 months, 3-6 months, 6-12 months and >12 months. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) at 1-year postoperatively. Results: A total of 95 patients were included in this study. ACLR delay of 3-6 months was not associated with the risk of meniscus injury, while a delay of 6-12 months (odds ratio [OR] = 4.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-16.79; p = 0.031) and >12 months (OR = 10.68; 95% CI = 2.55-42.22; p = 0.001) was associated with a likelihood of developing meniscus injury. Meniscus injury risk increased by 12% for each month of ACLR delay (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.04-1.22; p = 0.003). Regarding clinical outcomes at 1-year postoperatively, all groups exhibit the same clinical results. Conclusion: ACLR can be safely delayed up to 6 months after the initial injury. However, a delay for >6 months must be avoided, as it was found to significantly increase the likelihood of developing a meniscus injury. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Increased anterior tibial subluxation and differences between anterior tibial subluxation in the lateral and medial compartments are associated with failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether increased anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) and differences between ATS in the lateral and medial compartments (ATSL-M) are associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) failure. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched from their inception through 21 November 2023. The focus was on comparative studies reporting ATS in patients who experienced primary ACLR failure, in contrast to patients after primary ACLR with no evidence of graft failure. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the overall standardized mean difference between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of eight studies involving 963 patients were included in the final review. Three studies (64 cases and 171 controls) measured ATS on radiographs. The failed ACLR group exhibited a significantly increased ATS on radiographs compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Six studies (324 cases and 488 controls) measured lateral ATS on magnetic resonance imaging and five of them (285 cases and 374 controls) also measured medial ATS. The average values of lateral and medial ATS, as well as ATSL-M, were calculated and compared between the two groups. The failed ACLR group demonstrated significantly increased lateral (p < 0.001) and medial ATS (p < 0.001), the average value of lateral and medial ATS (p < 0.001) and ATSL-M (p = 0.039) compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Increased ATS and ATSL-M are associated with primary ACLR failure. The measurement of tibiofemoral position shows promise for its application in preoperative planning and postoperative management of ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Effectiveness of psychological intervention following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of psychological interventions in postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) compared to standard rehabilitation. METHODS: The databases searched were PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature, and EMBASE were searched from each database inception to May 2023 for published studies. The methodological quality was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment (RoB 2.0) tool. The evidence quality was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. RESULTS: Six papers were included in the meta-analysis. Psychological intervention significantly improved Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia at 3 months (Standard Mean Difference [SMD], -0.51. 95% Confidence Interval [CI], -0.85 to -0.17) and pain (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Pain, Numeric Rating Scale, Visual Analog Scale) at 3 months (SMD, -0.92. 95%CI, -1.69 to -0.15) and at 6 months following ACLR (MD, -1.25. 95%CI, -1.82 to -0.68) when compared with the standard rehabilitation, according to very low-quality data. Self-efficacy and knee strength did not show significant differences. CONCLUSION: Very low-quality evidence suggests that psychological intervention following ACLR yields better short-term outcomes compared to standard rehabilitation, with uncertainty about its clinically significant benefits over standard rehabilitation.

Longitudinal Analysis of Knee Articular Cartilage Degeneration After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of T1rho and T2 Mapping.

OBJECTIVE: To assess articular cartilage degeneration in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructed knees as detected by MR T1rho and T2 mapping relative to controls and longitudinally at 3 months and 1 year after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN: Twenty-five patients with acute ACL injury were enrolled (13 women and 12 men; mean age 30.8), and 14 healthy controls were selected by sex and age matching. The affected knees of the ACLR participants were imaged using a 3.0T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner 3 months and 1 year after ACLR. Cartilage T1rho and T2 values were quantified for subcompartments in the full-thickness, superficial, and deep layers and were compared with the matched subcompartments of control knees. The influence of concomitant meniscal tears identified using proton density-weighted imaging (PDWI) was also investigated. RESULTS: In the posterior lateral tibia, T1rho and T2 values were significantly higher in ACLR participants at 3 months and slightly decreased at 1-year compared to the control group. T1rho values in the medial compartment exhibited a significant increase at 1-year compared with those of control knees, while T2 showed no significance. In cartilage with medial meniscal tears, the T1rho values in multiple medial subcompartments were significantly higher than those in cartilage without medial meniscal tears, and this alteration was relatively detectable by T1rho. CONCLUSIONS: T1rho and T2 mapping is effective in evaluating cartilage degeneration following ACLR. T1rho may exhibit greater sensitivity for assessing the progression of early degeneration in the medial compartment after ACLR.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction Augmentation With Bone Marrow Aspirate, Demineralized Bone Matrix, and Suture Tape Demonstrates No Difference In Outcomes, But Faster Functional Recovery, Versus Non-augmented ACL Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), demineralized bone matrix (DBM), and suture tape augmentation (STA) vs. ACLR without biologic augmentation or STA. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled trial at a single institution was performed to compare ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA (Group A) vs. ACLR without biologic or STA (Group NA). One hundred patients were required. Skeletally mature patients <25 years old received quadriceps tendon autografts, while patients ≥25 years old received allograft ACLR with an all-inside technique. Concomitant meniscal pathologies were included. Primary outcomes compared were range-of-motion (ROM), limb symmetry, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Secondary outcomes included radiographic outcomes and surgical complications. Univariate and mixed-model regression analysis were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included (Group A: 29 patients, 11 females, 38%; Group NA: 30 patients, 15 females, 50%). Early range-of-motion at 6 weeks (125° vs 109° flexion, p<0.0001) and limb symmetry testing at 12 weeks (80.6 % vs. 36.7% [Delta 43.9%], p<0.001) were significantly improved in Group A. At two years, International Knee Documentation (IKDC) scores were similar (91.1 ± 12.7 vs. 85.3 ± 10.8, p=0.109). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) Quality of Life (QOL) scores were significantly enhanced in Group A (85.2 ± 20.9 vs. 72.1 ± 20.4, p=0.042). Twenty-two patients (12 Group A, 10 Group NA) underwent CT scans at 6-months to compare bone tunnel healing. Overall, the mean increase in bone tunnel diameter was significantly smaller in Group A vs. NA. No difference in graft re-ruptures or re-operations was observed. Seven of 59 patients (11.9%) underwent re-operation for stiffness (A: 3 (10%) vs. NA: 4 (13%), p=1.0). CONCLUSION: There were no differences in IKDC scores between groups at 2-year follow-up. Functional outcomes including early range-of-motion and limb symmetry were significantly improved in patients who received ACLR with BMAC, DBM, and STA. ACLRACLR.ACLR.

Does Combined Reconstruction of the Medial Collateral and Anterior Cruciate Ligaments Provide Better Knee Function? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: This study aimed to determine if medial collateral ligament reconstruction (MCLR) alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) preserves knee functionality better than isolated ACLR in combined ACL and MCL tears. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched systematically on 31 March 2023. Studies reporting post-operative function after ACLR and ACLR + MCLR in combined injuries were included. Outcomes included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, side-to-side difference (SSD), Lysholm, and Tegner scale values. Results: Out of 2362 papers, 8 studies met the criteria. The analysis found no significant difference in outcomes (MD = 3.63, 95% CI: [-5.05, 12.3] for IKDC; MD = -0.64, 95% CI: [-3.24, 1.96] for SSD at 0° extension; MD = -1.79, 95% CI: [-4.61, 1.04] for SSD at 30° extension; MD = -1.48, 95% CI: [-16.35, 13.39] for Lysholm scale; MD = -0.21, 95% CI: [-4.29, 3.87] for Tegner scale) between treatments. Conclusions: This meta-analysis found no significant difference in outcomes between ACLR and ACLR + MCLR, suggesting that adding MCLR does not provide additional benefits. Due to the heterogeneity and quality of the included studies, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the optimal treatment for combined severe MCL-ACL injuries.

The 45° and 60° of sagittal femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction provide similar knee stability.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare 45° and 60° of sagittal femoral tunnel angles in terms of anterior tibial translation (ATT), valgus angle and graft in situ force following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: Ten porcine knees were subjected to the following loading conditions: (1) 89 N anterior tibial load at 35° (full extension), 60° and 90° of knee flexion and (2) 5 N m valgus tibial moment at 35° and 45° of knee flexion. ATT and graft in situ force of the intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and ACLR were collected using a robotic universal force/moment sensor (UFS) testing system for (1) ACL intact, (2) ACL-deficient (ACLD) and (3) two different ACLR using different sagittal femoral tunnel angles (coronal 45°/sagittal 45° and coronal 45°/sagittal 60°). RESULTS: During the anterior tibial load, the femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 45° and 60° had significantly higher ATT than that of the ACL-intact knees at 60° of knee flexion (p < 0.05). The femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 60° had significantly lower graft in situ force than that of the ACL-intact knees at 60° and 90° of knee flexion (p < 0.05). During the valgus tibial moment, the femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 45° and 60° had significantly lower graft in situ force than that of the ACL-intact knees at all knee flexions (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The femoral tunnel angle of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 45° provided similar ATT, valgus angle and graft in situ force to that of ACLR knees at coronal 45°/sagittal 60°. Therefore, both femoral tunnel angles could be used in ACLR, as the sagittal femoral tunnel angle does not appear to be relevant in post-operative knee stability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.

No increased complication rate with the use of soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft for primary ACL reconstruction - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The autograft of choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains debateable. Recently there has been increased popularity of soft tissue quadriceps tendon (s-QT) autograft due to less donor site morbidity, reduced anterior knee pain and comparable re-operation and complication rates. The aim of this review was to analyse functional outcomes of primary ACLR using s-QT in adult population without the bone plug and to report its complication profile against other autografts. PATIENT AND METHODS: This systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and a review of literature was conducted on four online databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane and Google Scholar). Clinical studies reporting on patients undergoing primary ACLR with s-QT autograft or in comparison to BPTB or HS autografts with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included. The studies were inclusive of only all soft tissue QT autograft regardless of the implants or fixation method used. Critical appraisal of studies was conducted using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were eligible. There were three randomised control studies (RCT) and 11 non-randomised comparative studies with 1543 patients who underwent ACLR. 682 underwent s-QT, 498 had hamstring tendon (HT) and 174 had bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB). 60% (n = 930) were males and mean follow up was 23.6 months (6-65). Eight studies reported post-operative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). The mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 91.5 ± 15.1 whereas mean Lysholm score was 90 ± 3.9. Five studies reported on laxity with mean anterior tibial translation (ATT) of 1.28 ± 1.09 mm. Overall complication rate of s-QT ACLR was 6% with 3% graft failure, 0.52% arthrofibrosis, 0.2% infection, 0.75% revision ACLR. There was no significant difference in functional outcome scores, knee stability and range of motion (ROM) between s-QT, HT and BPTB. CONCLUSION: s-QT for ACLR has a comparable functional outcome, laxity, failure and with overall graft failure rate of 3%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; Systematic review and meta-analysis.

High rates of donor site healing using quadriceps tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A case series.

Purpose: To investigate the healing of the quadriceps tendon donor site after partial thickness graft harvesting through ultrasound imaging at a short-term follow-up of 6-month following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to investigate the clinical outcomes. Methods: Between March 2019 and August 2020, 61 knees were retrospectively included in this study. Intraoperatively, the length, width and thickness of the harvested QT graft were measured. At a 6-month follow-up, patients were assessed by one of five radiologists, following the same protocol to calculate the defect volume, and patients performed a self-evaluation of pain on the Visual Analogue Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS). Results: Intraoperatively, the QT grafts had a volume of 4635.4 ± 912.5 mm3. Postoperatively, ultrasound was performed at 6.5 ± 0.7 months, and the defect volume was 323.3 ± 389.2 mm3, representing a healing rate of 93% ± 9% of the donor site. At a minimum 6-month follow-up, IKDC was 61.6 ± 16 and KOOS was 70.2 ± 16.6. Age was significantly associated with the healing rate (ß: -0.005; p = 0.032). Conclusion: At 6 months follow-up, the defect size of the QT donor site had healed by 93 ± 9% leaving a mean defect volume of 323.3 mm3 according to ultrasound measurements. This suggests that the QT has a high capacity for healing after graft harvesting, with 10 patients reaching full defect closure 6 months after surgery. The clinical relevance of these findings is that the quadriceps tendon donor site has high rates of healing, but surgeons should be aware of lower healing rates in older patients. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Male sex, revision surgery, low volume of anterior cruciate ligament remnant, and significant instability are risk factors for Posterior Root Tear of the Lateral Meniscus in patients undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: This multicenter study aimed to determine the incidence of lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction and identify associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study using data from the Francophone Arthroscopic Society's registry. The study included all the patients in the registry who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery between June 2020 and June 2023, we excluded incomplete data. We compared delay from injury to surgery between LMPRTs group and No LMPRTs group. Variables investigated as potential risk factors for LMPRTs included age, sex, nature of surgery (primary or revision), pivot shift test result, side-to-side laxity under anesthesia, presence of ACL remnant, occurrence of medial meniscal tear, and presence of collateral ligament injury. Risk factors were analyzed using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Among the 5359 patients analyzed, LMPRTs occurred in 7.0% (n=375) of cases during ACL reconstruction. Mean age at surgery was 29.3 +/- 10.3 years old [11-77]. Concerning delay to surgery, the mean time was 8.4 +/- 23.1 weeks [0.0-347.2] in the No LMPRTs group and 6.5 +/- 10.2 weeks [0.2-61.6] in the LMPRTs group (p = 0.109). Univariate analysis revealed that male sex (p < 0.001), revision surgery (p < 0.001), medial meniscal injury (p = 0.007), ACL remnant (0% vs > 70%, <10% vs > 70%, 10 to 30% vs > 70%, 30 to 50% vs > 70%, 50 to 70% vs > 70%; p < 0.001) and higher pivot shift grade (p = 0.011) were significantly associated with a presence of LMPRTs. Age, side-to-side laxity, and collateral ligament injury were not found to be significant risk factor In multivariate analysis : male sex, revision surgery, pivot shift test result and a low volume of ACL remnant remained significant. Side to side laxity was also a significant factor in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study identified male sex, revision surgery, low volume of ACL remnant, side to side laxity and higher grade of pivot shift as significant risk factors for LMPRTs during ACL reconstruction.

Double-Bundle Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Improves Anteromedial Rotatory Instability.

BACKGROUND: New techniques have been proposed to better address anteromedial rotatory instability in a medial collateral ligament (MCL)-injured knee that require an extra graft and more surgical implants, which might not be feasible in every clinical setting. PURPOSE: To investigate if improved resistance to anteromedial rotatory instability can be achieved by using a single-graft, double-bundle (DB) MCL reconstruction with a proximal fixation more anteriorly on the tibia, in comparison with the gold standard single-bundle (SB) MCL reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator in intact knee, superficial MCL/deep MCL-deficient, and reconstruction states. Three different reconstructions were tested: DB MCL no proximal tibial fixation and DB and SB MCL reconstruction with proximal tibial fixation. Knee kinematics were recorded at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion for the following measurements: 8 N·m of valgus rotation (VR), 5 N·m of external tibial rotation, 5 N·m of internal tibial rotation, combined 89 N of anterior tibial translation and 5 N·m of external rotation for anteromedial rotation (AMR) and anteromedial translation (AMT). The differences between each state for every measurement were analyzed with VR and AMR/AMT as primary outcomes. RESULTS: Cutting the superficial MCL/deep MCL increased VR and AMR/AMT in all knee positions except at 90° for VR (P < .05). All reconstructions restored VR to the intact state except at 90° of knee flexion (P < .05). The DB MCL no proximal tibial fixation reconstruction could not restore intact AMR/AMT kinematics in any knee position (P < .05). Adding an anterior-based proximal tibial fixation restored intact AMR/AMT kinematics at ≥30° of knee flexion except at 90° for AMT (P < .05). The SB MCL reconstruction could not restore intact AMR/AMT kinematics at 0° and 90° of knee flexion (P < .05). CONCLUSION: In this in vitro cadaveric study, a DB MCL reconstruction with anteriorly placed proximal tibial fixation was able to control AMR and AMT better than the gold standard SB MCL reconstruction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In patients with anteromedial rotatory instability and valgus instability, a DB MCL reconstruction may be superior to the SB MCL reconstruction, without causing extra surgical morbidity or additional costs.

Conditioning of Motor Evoked Responses After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Effects of Stimulus Intensity.

BACKGROUND: Operant conditioning of motor evoked torque (MEPTORQUE) can directly target the corticospinal pathway in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, it remains unclear whether operant conditioning can elicit short-term improvements in corticospinal excitability and whether these improvements are influenced by stimulus intensity. HYPOTHESIS: Quadriceps MEPTORQUE responses can be upconditioned in a single session and will elicit short-term adaptations in corticospinal excitability, with higher stimulus intensities eliciting greater effects. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled laboratory study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. METHODS: Thirty-six participants were assessed during a single session of an operant conditioning protocol. Participants were randomized into 1 of 3 groups for stimulus intensity used during operant conditioning based on the participant's active motor threshold (AMT: 100%, 120%, and 140%). Quadriceps MEPTORQUE amplitude was evaluated during a block of control transcranial magnetic stimulation trials (CTRL) to establish baseline corticospinal excitability, and 3 blocks of conditioning trials (COND) during which participants trained to upcondition their MEPTORQUE. MEPTORQUE recruitment curves were collected to evaluate the effect of operant conditioning on acute corticospinal adaptations. RESULTS: Participants with ACL reconstruction could upcondition their MEPTORQUE in a single session (P < 0.01; CTRL, 17.27 ± 1.28; COND, 21.35 ± 1.28 [mean ± standard error [SE] in N·m]), but this ability was not influenced by the stimulus intensity used during training (P = 0.84). Furthermore, significant improvements in corticospinal excitability were observed (P = 0.05; PRE, 687.91 ± 50.15; POST, 761.08 ± 50.15 [mean ± SE in N·m %AMT]), but stimulus intensity did not influence corticospinal adaptations (P = 0.67). CONCLUSION: Operant conditioning can elicit short-term neural adaptations in ACL-reconstructed patients. Future operant conditioning paradigms may effectively use any of the 3 stimulus intensities studied herein. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Operant conditioning may be a feasible approach to improve corticospinal excitability after ACL reconstruction.

Load Sharing of the Deep and Superficial Medial Collateral Ligaments, the Effect of a Partial Superficial Medial Collateral Injury, and Implications on ACL Load.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the deep medial collateral ligament (dMCL) and partial superficial MCL (psMCL) can cause anteromedial rotatory instability; however, the contribution of each these injuries in restraining anteromedial rotatory instability and the effect on the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) load remain unknown. PURPOSE: To investigate the contributions of the different MCL structures in restraining tibiofemoral motion and to evaluate the load through the ACL after MCL injury, especially after combined dMCL/psMCL injury. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Sixteen fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested using a 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator. Tibiofemoral kinematic parameters were recorded at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion for the following measurements: 8-N·m valgus rotation, 4-N·m external tibial rotation (ER), 4-N·m internal tibial rotation, and a combined 89-N anterior tibial translation and 4-N·m ER for both anteromedial rotation (AMR) and anteromedial translation (AMT). The kinematic parameters of the 3 different MCL injuries (dMCL; dMCL/psMCL; dMCL/superficial MCL (sMCL)) were recorded and reapplied either in an ACL-deficient joint (load sharing) or before and after cutting the ACL (ACL load). The loads were calculated by applying the principle of superposition. RESULTS: The dMCL had the largest effect on reducing the force/torque during ER, AMR, and AMT in extension and the psMCL injury at 30° to 90° of knee flexion (P < .05). In a comparison of the load through the ACL when the MCL was intact, the ACL load increased by 46% and 127% after dMCL injury and combined dMCL/psMCL injury, respectively, at 30° of knee flexion during ER. In valgus rotation, a significant increase in ACL load was seen only at 90° of knee flexion. CONCLUSION: The psMCL injury made the largest contribution to the reduction of net force/torque during AMR/AMT at 30° to 90° of flexion. Concomitant dMCL/psMCL injury increased the ACL load, mainly during ER. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: If a surgical procedure is being considered to treat anteromedial rotatory instability, then the procedure should focus on restoring sMCL function, as injury to this structure causes a major loss of the knee joint's capacity to restrain AMR/AMT.

The Role of Osteotomy in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Coronal and sagittal plane knee malalignments have been shown to increase the forces on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Studies have shown the benefit of high tibial osteotomy to address coronal and sagittal imbalance in revision ACLR. The purpose of this article is to further describe the use of osteotomy by reviewing preoperative planning, indications, techniques, and outcomes of high tibial opening and closing wedge as well as anterior tibial closing wedge osteotomies in the setting of ACLR.

Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Associated Procedures.

Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common yet devastating complication due to inferior clinical outcomes associated with revision ACLR. Identifying the cause and associated risk factors for failure is the most important consideration during preoperative planning. Special attention to tunnel quality, concomitant injuries, and modifiable risk factors will help determine the optimal approach and staging for revision ACLR. Additional procedures including lateral extra-articular tenodesis and osteotomy may be considered for at-risk populations. The purpose of this review is to explore causes of ACLR failure, clinical indications and appropriate patient evaluation, and technical considerations when performing revision ACLR.