RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Intravenous lidocaine is increasingly used as a nonopioid analgesic, but how it acts in the brain is incompletely understood. We conducted a functional MRI study of pain response, resting connectivity, and cognitive task performance in volunteers to elucidate the effects of lidocaine at the brain-systems level. METHODS: We enrolled 27 adults (age 22-55 yr) in this single-arm, open-label study. Pain response task and resting-state functional MRI scans at 3 T were obtained at baseline and then with a constant effect-site concentration of lidocaine. Electric nerve stimulation, titrated in advance to 7/10 intensity, was used for the pain task (five times every 10 s). Group-level differences in pain task-evoked responses (primary outcome, focused on the insula) and in resting connectivity were compared between baseline and lidocaine conditions, using adjusted P<0.05 to account for multiple comparisons. Pain ratings and performance on a brief battery of computer-based tasks were also recorded. RESULTS: Lidocaine infusion was associated with decreased pain-evoked responses in the insula (left: Z=3.6, P<0.001, right: Z=3.6, P=0.004) and other brain areas including the cingulate gyrus, thalamus, and primary sensory cortex. Resting-state connectivity showed significant diffuse reductions in both region-to-region and global connectivity measures with lidocaine. Small decreases in pain intensity and unpleasantness and worse memory performance were also seen with lidocaine. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine was associated with broad reductions in functional MRI response to acute pain and modulated whole-brain functional connectivity, predominantly decreasing long-range connectivity. This was accompanied by small but significant decreases in pain perception and memory performance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05501600.
RESUMEN
Introduction Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is a minimally invasive surgical technique though effective analgesia remains a challenge. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has gained popularity due to its ease and safety of placement. In this study, we evaluated the analgesic efficacy of ESPB in patients undergoing VATS through a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome is the total opioid use in the first 12 postoperative hours. Methods We used binomial logistic regression to model whether patients received ESPB as a function of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, and surgery type to generate a propensity score for each patient for matching. Results After screening 286 patients, 55 patients each in the ESPB and no-block groups were matched. ESPB was associated with a 1.2 mg (95% CI: -2.2 to -0.2) reduction in opioid use in IV hydromorphone equivalents when compared to no block. However, there was no reduction in the 12-hour pain score area under the curve or incidence of complications between the two groups. Conclusions ESPB was associated with a modest reduction in total opioid consumption although not a difference in pain score. While its analgesic efficacy may be limited, ESPB could be considered a component of multi-modal analgesia in VATS.
RESUMEN
Although previous studies suggest that Piezo2 regulates chronic pain in the orofacial area, few studies have reported the direct evidence of Piezo2's involvement in inflammatory and neuropathic pain in the orofacial region. In this study, we used male Sprague Dawley rats to investigate the role of the Piezo2 pathway in the development of inflammatory and neuropathic pain. The present study used interleukin (IL)-1ß-induced pronociception as an inflammatory pain model. Subcutaneous injection of IL-1ß produced significant mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. Subcutaneous injection of a Piezo2 inhibitor significantly blocked mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia induced by subcutaneously injected IL-1ß. Furthermore, the present study also used a neuropathic pain model caused by the misplacement of a dental implant, leading to notable mechanical allodynia as a consequence of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Western blot analysis revealed increased levels of Piezo2 in the trigeminal ganglion and the trigeminal subnucleus caudalis after inferior alveolar nerve injury. Furthermore, subcutaneous and intracisternal injections of a Piezo2 inhibitor blocked neuropathic mechanical allodynia. These results suggest that the Piezo2 pathway plays a critical role in the development of inflammatory and neuropathic pain in the orofacial area. Therefore, blocking the Piezo2 pathway could be the foundation for developing new therapeutic strategies to treat orofacial pain conditions.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Facial , Hiperalgesia , Neuralgia , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Animales , Masculino , Hiperalgesia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperalgesia/metabolismo , Neuralgia/metabolismo , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia/etiología , Ratas , Dolor Facial/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Facial/metabolismo , Inflamación/metabolismo , Inflamación/tratamiento farmacológico , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Canales Iónicos/metabolismo , Canales Iónicos/antagonistas & inhibidores , Ganglio del Trigémino/metabolismo , Ganglio del Trigémino/efectos de los fármacos , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Transducción de Señal/fisiologíaRESUMEN
COVID-19 infections have been linked with multiple neurological manifestations. One of the infrequent complications of post-COVID-19 infection is trigeminal neuropathy. Despite its infrequency, few cases of trigeminal neuropathy following COVID-19 infection have been documented in the literature. However, there remains a paucity of evidence regarding isolated trigeminal neuropathy following COVID-19, particularly in cases devoid of pain but characterized by sensory deficits such as loss of sensation and paresthesia only. We describe a clinical case of trigeminal neuropathy that emerged after a COVID-19 infection at our institution. Our case report delves into the clinical presentation of such trigeminal neuropathy that would aid clinicians in including this pathology in their differential diagnosis.
RESUMEN
AIM: To implement strategies to improve the care of patients with acute pain in the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Pre-post implementation study using a Type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation design. METHODS: Implementation strategies were introduced and monitored through the Ottawa Model of Research Uses' assessment, monitoring and evaluation cycles, supported by focused and sustained facilitation. RESULTS: Improvements in time-to-analgesia within 30 min (21%-27%), administration of nurse-initiated analgesia (NIA) (17%-27%) and measurement of pain (65%-75%) were achieved post-implementation. NIA was the strongest predictor of receiving analgesia within 30 min. Adoption of pain interventions into practice was not immediate yet responded to sustained facilitation of implementation strategies. CONCLUSION: Collaboration with local clinicians to introduce simple interventions that did not disrupt workflow or substantially add to workload were effective in improving analgesia administration rates, and the proportion of patients receiving analgesia within 30 min. The assessment, monitoring and evaluation cycles enabled agile and responsive facilitation of implementation activities within the dynamic ED environment. Improvements took time to embed into practice, trending upward over the course of the implementation period, supporting the sustained facilitation approach throughout the study. IMPLICATIONS: Sustained adoption of evidence-based pain interventions into the care of people presenting to the ED with acute pain can be achieved through sustained facilitation of implementation. NIA should be at the centre of acute pain management in the ED. IMPACT: This study addressed the lingering gap between evidence and practice for patients with acute pain in the ED. Implementation of locally relevant/informed implementation strategies supported by focused and sustained facilitation improved the care of patients with acute pain in the ED. This research will have an impact on people presenting to EDs with acute pain, and on clinicians treating people with acute pain in the ED. Relevant equator guidelines were followed and the StaRI reporting method used. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution in this study.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines for pain treatment recommend a personalized, multimodal and interdisciplinary approach as well as the use of a combination of drug and non-drug therapies. Risk factors for chronification should already be reduced in patients with acute pain, e.g., after surgery or trauma. Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) could be an effective non-drug therapy in the multimodal treatment of chronic and acute pain. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of aVNS in treating chronic and acute pain conditions. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed regarding the application of auricular electrical stimulation in chronic and acute pain. Studies were classified according to their level of evidence (Jadad scale), scientific validity and risk of bias (RoB 2 tool) and analyzed regarding indication, method, stimulation parameters, duration of treatment and efficacy and safety. A meta-analysis on (randomized) controlled trials (using different comparators) was performed for chronic and acute pain conditions, respectively, including subgroup analysis for percutaneous (pVNS-needle electrodes) and transcutaneous (tVNS-surface electrodes) aVNS. The visual analog pain scale (VAS) was defined as primary efficacy endpoint. RESULTS: A total of n = 1496 patients were treated with aVNS in 23 identified and analyzed studies in chronic pain, 12 studies in acute postoperative pain and 7 studies in experimental acute pain. Of these, seven studies for chronic pain and six studies for acute postoperative pain were included in the meta-analysis. In chronic pain conditions, including back pain, migraine and abdominal pain, a statistically significant reduction in VAS pain intensity for active compared to sham aVNS or control treatment with an effect size Hedges' g/mean difference of - 1.95 (95% confidence interval [CI]: - 3.94 to 0.04, p = 0.008) could be shown and a more favorable effect in pVNS compared to tVNS (- 5.40 [- 8.94; - 1.85] vs. - 1.00 [- 1.55; - 0.44]; p = 0.015). In acute pain conditions, single studies showed significant improvements with aVNS, e.g., in kidney donor surgery or tonsillectomy but, overall, a non-statistically significant reduction in VAS pain intensity for active compared to sham aVNS or control with - 0.70 [- 2.34; 0.93] (p = 0.15) could be observed in the meta-analysis. In acute pain results vary greatly between studies depending especially on co-medication and timepoints of assessment after surgery. A significant reduction in analgesics or opiate intake was documented in most studies evaluating this effect in chronic and acute pain. In 3 of the 12 randomized controlled trials in patients with chronic pain, a sustainable pain reduction over a period of up to 12 months was shown. Overall, aVNS was very well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that aVNS can be an effective and safe non-drug treatment in patients with specific chronic and acute postoperative pain conditions. Further research is needed to identify the influence of simulation parameters and find optimal and standardized treatment protocols while considering quality-of-life outcome parameters and prolonged follow-up periods. A more standardized approach and harmonization in study designs would improve comparability and robustness of outcomes.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Acupuncture's role in surgical and postoperative contexts is gaining traction. However, the evidence remains patchy and is often of low-grade quality, particularly in the context of postintestinal surgery. Purpose: To assess acupuncture's efficacy in pain relief and functional recovery after abdominal surgery. Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for randomized trials using manual acupuncture as the main intervention. Outcomes included postoperative pain, analgesic use, nausea, gastrointestinal (GI) regeneration, and length of hospital stay. For risk of bias assessment Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 was employed. Registered with PROSPERO: CRD42022311718. Results: Of 700 records till May 2023, 8 trials (551 patients; 16-200/trial) were included. Due to factors such as varying experimental settings and unpublished protocols, there was high risk of bias and heterogeneity, making meta-analysis unfeasible. Safety data were documented sufficiently by two trials. However, acupuncture showed marked benefits in pain relief, less analgesic use, fewer nausea cases, and improved GI recovery. One study reported reduced hospitalization time. Conclusion: Due to the varied methodologies and potential biases in existing studies, the definitive effectiveness of acupuncture remains unclear. To confirm the potential benefits of acupuncture as suggested by the reviewed studies, it's imperative to have more standardized study protocols, well-defined interventions and controls, and objective measures of efficacy.
RESUMEN
Chronic back or limb pain is often debilitating and disabling resulting in loss of efficiency, depression, and low self-esteem. Diagnosis usually suggests arthritis or nerve root pathology and patients receive long-term oral analgesics and invasive procedures with little or no relief. Hypothyroidism may present as peripheral neuropathy which may be clinically indistinguishable from entrapment neuropathy as occurs with neural canal stenosis. Muscle cramps, aches, proximal symmetrical muscle weakness, stiffness, polymyositis, and exercise intolerance may be the only presenting symptom indicating hypothyroidism. We present five cases of acute on chronic pain that improved significantly on treatment with thyroxine. Neuromuscular pain may be the only presenting symptom of hypothyroidism. Thyroid profile (TSH, FT3, FT4) and anti-thyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) antibodies should be screened before subjecting the patient to multiple analgesics and procedures.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) reduces postoperative discomfort and expedites recovery compared to open thoracotomy. Effective postoperative pain management is crucial to enhance recovery and reduce complications. Ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist, has shown promise, though its efficacy in VATS remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ketamine in reducing acute pain in VATS patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE (PubMed), CENTRAL, Embase, Science Direct, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov was conducted. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intraoperative intravenous ketamine with normal saline in VATS patients and reporting postoperative pain scores. Statistical analyses were performed using R version 4.3.3. Cochrane risk of bias (RoB2) tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. RESULTS: A total of 10 RCTs with 1,151 participants were included. Ketamine was associated with a significant reduction in postoperative pain at 12 (MD -0.65, p = 0.04) and 48 hours (MD -0.55 points, p < 0.01) post-surgery. No significant difference was observed in pain scores within the first 3 hours, at 6 and 12 hours, 24-h postoperative opioid consumption, urine output, surgery duration, rescue analgesia, mean arterial pressure, infusion volume, heart rate, extubation time, and blood loss. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to low across the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative intravenous ketamine effectively reduces acute postoperative pain in VATS patients but does not significantly impact opioid consumption, hemodynamic parameters, and adverse events. Large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore ketamine's potential benefits for chronic pain management. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42024527858).
RESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Newer regional anesthesia techniques and minimally invasive surgeries have yielded decreased postoperative pain scores, potentially leading to decreased need for perioperative epidural analgesia. Limited literature is available on trends in usage rates of epidurals. The objective of this study was to identify trends in perioperative epidural analgesia rates among multiple fields of surgery. METHODS: All patients undergoing general, thoracic, urologic, plastic, vascular, orthopedic, or gynecological surgery in 2014-2020 were included from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database of over 700 hospitals in the U.S. and 11 different countries. Annual trends in epidural analgesia for all surgeries and each surgical specialty were assessed by mixed effects multivariable logistic regression. The odds ratios (OR) and 99 % confidence intervals (CI) were reported. RESULTS: There were 3,111,435 patients from 2014 to 2020 that were included in the final analysis, in which 107,209 (3.4 %) received perioperative epidural analgesia. Among all surgeries combined, epidural use throughout the study period decreased (OR 0.98 per year, 99 % CI 0.97-0.98, P < 0.001). When only analyzing the surgeries with the top 5 most frequent epidural use per specialty, there was no statistically significant trend in epidural utilization (OR 0.99 per year, 99 % CI 0.99-1.00, P = 0.09). However, there was an increasing trend in epidural utilization in general surgery (OR 1.05 per year, 99 % CI 1.03-1.07, P < 0.001) and vascular surgery (OR 1.08 per year, 99 % CI 1.05-1.10, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Rates of perioperative epidural analgesia use has decreased in recent years overall, however, among surgeries within the general surgery and vascular surgery specialty, utilization has increased for procedures that have the highest rates of usage.
RESUMEN
The transition from acute to chronic low back pain (LBP) in community settings is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of recruitment and estimate the transition and continuation of chronic LBP. We also explored characteristics associated with this transition to chronic LBP. We enrolled n=131 participants, of which n=118 (90%) completed 3-month outcomes and n=111 (85%) completed 6-month outcomes. Acute LBP was defined by a duration of <4 weeks and a 30-day LBP-free period before the current acute episode. Chronic LBP was defined as pain most or every day over the past 3 months. The transition from acute to chronic LBP at 3 months was 32.2% (38/118), and at 6 months, 80.6% (25/31) of participants who transitioned at 3 months continued to have chronic LBP at 6 months. Participants with more frequent acute LBP and at an intensity of 30/100 were more likely to transition to chronic LBP (Risk Ratio (RR)=3.13, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.84, 5.30) and continue to have chronic LBP at 6-months (RR=3.10, 95% CI 1.48, 6.08). Higher risk on the STarT Back Screening Tool was associated with the transition to chronic LBP at 3 months (RR=1.73, 95% CI 1.28, 2.35) and continuation of chronic LBP at 6 months (RR=1.26, 95% CI 1.10, 1.45). The recruitment of acute LBP was feasible in a community setting. Acute LBP is a common condition in the community and frequently transitions to chronic LBP, suggesting the potential for substantial burden in the community. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the feasibility of conducting a community-based study to describe the transition, continuation, and psychosocial predictors of acute to chronic low back pain. These findings could help identify community participants at high risk of incident and continued chronic low back pain. DATA AVAILABILITY: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [AG], upon reasonable request.
RESUMEN
Background: Each year in England, 450,000 children and young people (CYP) under 18 years of age are transported by ambulance to emergency departments. Approximately 20% of these suffer acute pain caused by illness or injury. Pain is a highly complex sensory and emotional experience. The intersection between acute pain, unwell CYP and the unpredictable pre-hospital environment is convoluted. Studies have shown that prehospital pain management in CYP is poor, with 61% of those suffering acute pain not achieving effective pain relief (abolition or reduction of pain score by 2 or more out of 10) when attended by ambulance. Consequences of poor acute pain management include altered pain perception, post-traumatic stress disorder and the development of chronic pain. This realist review will aim to understand how ambulance clinicians can provide improved prehospital acute pain management for CYP. Methods: A realist review will be conducted in accordance with the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) guidance. A five-stage approach will be adopted; 1) Developing an Initial Programme Theory (IPT): develop an IPT with key stakeholder input and evidence from informal searching; 2) Searching and screening: conduct a thorough search of relevant research databases and other literature sources and perform screening in duplicate; 3) Relevance and rigour assessment: assess documents for relevance and rigour in duplicate; 4) Extracting and organising data: code relevant data into conceptual "buckets" using qualitative data analysis software; and 5) Synthesis and Programme Theory (PT) refinement: utilise a realist logic of analysis to generate context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) within and across conceptual "buckets", test and refine the IPT into a realist PT. Conclusion: The realist PT will enhance our understanding of what works best to improve acute prehospital pain management in CYP, which will then be tested and refined within a realist evaluation. Registration: PROSPERO Registration: CRD42024505978.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The outcome domains pain intensity, pain-related interference, side effects, (treatment) information, participation and personal interaction have all been identified as relevant factors in the management of perioperative pain. However, it is not yet clear which of these are particularly significant for the subjectively perceived overall quality of postoperative pain management. AIM: A newly developed questionnaire was used in this cross-sectional study to assess the relevance of these domains for patients and compare the relevance to healthcare professionals (HCP). METHODS: The patient survey (nâ¯= 40) was conducted on the first postoperative day at Jena University Hospital, Germany. In order to investigate group differences, 63 HCP (disciplines: nâ¯= 15 anaesthesiology, nâ¯= 17 surgery, nâ¯= 31 nursing) were recruited. The questionnaire primarily included all pairwise comparisons between the domains with regard to the overall quality of postoperative pain management. The resulting sum scores for each domain were the primary outcome measure, which were analysed using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Within the group of patients, there were significant differences in the prioritization of the six outcome domains, with personal interaction followed by intensity and interference having received the highest ratings. There were also significant differences within the domains between the perspectives of patients and HCP, as well as between the HCP themselves. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that personal interaction and the reduction of pain intensity and interference are three key factors that are significant for patients' experience of postoperative pain management. However, the extent to which the harmonisation of these three factors with those given prominence by HCP would positively impact postoperative pain management remains unclear and should be investigated further.
RESUMEN
The opioid epidemic continues to have a staggering impact on millions of individuals and families across all socioeconomic levels and communities. Recent studies suggest high numbers of patients presenting for surgery with reported opioid misuse and/or opioid use disorder (OUD). Anesthesiologists often lack basic education to treat patients suffering with OUD or patients in recovery from this treatable disease. This manuscript will provide a review of the American Society of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Multisociety Working Group Practice Advisory recommendations on existing OUD treatment barriers and perioperative management best practices; it will also demonstrate the benefits that greater involvement of the anesthesiologist can have in managing patients with OUD perioperatively.
RESUMEN
Innervation of the shoulder joint is complex and remains poorly understood among regional anesthesiologists and chronic pain specialists. Current literature supports the important contribution of the axillary nerve to the total innervation of the shoulder, as well as its blockade for perioperative pain and denervation for chronic shoulder pain. However, a description of the entire course of the axillary nerve, the corresponding optimal targets, and the sonoanatomy pertinent to pain intervention is lacking. This educational article discusses in detail the functional anatomy and sonographic identification of possible windows for axillary nerve intervention. We discuss the contribution, extent, and type of innervation the axillary nerve provides to the shoulder joint, which is often misunderstood. Ultimately, this article serves to stimulate thoughts and ideas for future research in an area where literature is scarce.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ability of socially assistive robots (SARs) to treat dementia and Alzheimer's disease has been verified. Currently, to increase the range of their application, there is an increasing amount of interest in using SARs to relieve pain and negative emotions among children in routine medical settings. However, there is little consensus regarding the use of these robots. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of SARs on pain and negative affectivity among children undergoing invasive needle-based procedures. DESIGN: This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook guidelines. METHODS: The PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and WanFang databases were searched from inception to January 2024 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0 (RoB2.0) to assess the risk of bias among the included studies, and we used RevMan 5.4 software to conduct the meta-analysis. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to assess the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: Ten RCTs involving 815 pediatric subjects were selected for this review and reported outcomes related to pain and emotions during IV placement, port needle insertion, flu vaccination, blood sampling, and dental treatment. Children undergoing needle-related procedures with SARs reported less anxiety (SMD= -0.36; 95% CI= -0.64, -0.09) and fewer distressed avoidance behaviors (SMD= -0.67; 95% CI= -1.04, -0.30) than did those receiving typical care. There were nonsignificant differences between these groups in terms of in pain (SMD = -0.02; 95% CI = - 0.81, 0.78) and fear (SMD = 0.38; 95% CI= -0.06, 0.82). The results of exploratory subgroup analyses revealed no statistically significant differences based on the intervention type of robots or anesthetic use. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SARs is a promising intervention method for alleviating anxiety and distress among children undergoing needle-related procedures. However, additional high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate these conclusions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of this study has been registered in the database PROSPERO (registration ID: CRD42023413279).
Asunto(s)
Agujas , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos , Robótica , Niño , Humanos , Agujas/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/etiología , Dolor Asociado a Procedimientos Médicos/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is scarce literature regarding the use of continuous peripheral nerve blocks in acute burn patients, who may be at higher risk for catheter-related complications, including infection. We sought to describe our center's experience and infection rate with continuous perineural catheters in the setting of pain management for patients suffering from burns. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed including all patients admitted to an American Burn Association-verified regional burn center between January 2018 and July 2023 who received a continuous peripheral nerve block for an acute burn injury. RESULTS: There were 281 patients in the study cohort who received 484 perineural catheters. The cohort was 52% men with a median age of 39 years (IQR 30-55). A catheter-associated infection, defined as a clinical diagnosis by the treating physicians requiring the need for treatment with antibiotics or surgical debridement, was identified in six perineural catheters (1.2%, 95% CI 0% to 2.2%) involving six different patients (2.1%, 95% CI 0% to 3.8%). The median total body surface area burned was 5% (IQR 2-9%) and 20% of patients had full-thickness burns. The most commonly used catheters were infraclavicular (49%), popliteal sciatic (29%), femoral (19%), and adductor canal (17%). One-third (33%) of patients did not require operating room debridement as the block provided sufficient analgesia for bedside debridement. The median duration of catheter use was 6 days (IQR 4-8). There were no documented cases of nerve injury or toxicity, vascular injury, or local anesthetic systemic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: In our practice, continuous perineural catheters in the setting of acute burns are associated with an infection rate comparable to other surgical populations.
RESUMEN
Virtual reality (VR) needs to be implemented in clinical settings to improve pediatric patient care during painful medical procedures. Engaging doctors and nurses to lead the adoption of new clinical techniques can facilitate the transition from research to routine practice. Integrating VR into routine clinical practice could reduce patient pain and anxiety, making medical procedures smoother and more efficient. This feasibility pilot quality improvement (QI) project provides evidence for broader expansion and implementation of VR into different clinical areas. Medical providers (doctors and nurses) implemented VR during brief pediatric medical procedures and completed a demographics and feasibility survey. Qualitative feedback from semi-structured interviews indicated VR's ease of use and effectiveness in reducing anxiety and easing medical procedures. Patients (n = 30) played the VR game during either their medically necessary pin-pulling or needlestick procedures within three clinical environments. Children ranged from 5-16 years and were 50% male. The majority of patients reported enjoyment (mean 8.2 out of 10) with VR during the procedure, and only one minor technical issue was reported. Qualitative semi-structured interview data showed the benefits of using VR, including its ease of use, decreased observed anxiety, and patients having an easier time getting through the medical procedures. Feedback from medical providers regarding the dissemination of VR into pediatric clinical environments showed promising results. Standardized guidelines are needed to further implement VR pain alleviation into standard care in real-world clinical settings. This pilot study suggests that VR could be a valuable tool in pediatric pain management, warranting further research and broader clinical implementation.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With the ongoing opioid crisis, there is a continued need to develop multimodal pain management strategies inclusive of non-pharmacological treatments. Virtual reality (VR) offers a non-invasive treatment approach for the management of acute and chronic pain including postoperative pain. The aim of this review is to describe the use of VR and its effect on pain-related outcome measures compared to routine care in various types of surgical procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: Severe postoperative pain is associated with an increased risk of medical complications and may lead to the development of chronic pain. VR-based interventions are a form of distraction therapy that attenuates pain perception and have been shown to reduce activity in central pain-processing regions. In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, VR may reduce postoperative pain and improve physiological parameters such as heart rate and blood pressure. VR technology was found to have a high satisfaction rate in patients undergoing laparoscopic abdominal surgeries. Three-dimensional (3D) VR interventions may be useful for postoperative pain control in patients undergoing head and neck surgery. VR technology has revealed mixed results for postoperative pain control following orthopedic procedures although it has beneficial effects on functional outcomes during postoperative rehabilitation. In the pediatric population, VR is notable for its applicability in postoperative pain control and anxiety. VR technology is a novel, non-pharmacologic adjunct in the management of postoperative pain. Current studies are limited regarding therapy adaptations for the elderly population. High-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the clinical effectiveness of VR-based therapies in the postoperative setting.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability for individuals and societies globally. Prior investigations have predominantly centered around biological and psychological factors. Addressing social determinants is critical for enhancing the effectiveness and equity of pain interventions. We aimed to characterize social factors, sleep, and pain among adults with acute LBP, focusing on perceived community control. METHODS: A community-based sample of adults with acute LBP was recruited from two cities in North Carolina, United States, and followed up at 3 months. We used descriptive statistics to characterize social factors, sleep, and pain, overall and by levels of perceived community control. RESULTS: In total, 110/131 enrolled participants had data on perceived community control (lower scores indicate higher control). Overall, the median perceived community control was 14 (interquartile range [IQR] = 11, 15). People with high perceived community control also had, on average, higher perceived individual control, better-perceived neighborhood walkability, lower number of sites with bothersome comorbid pain, and higher sleep quality. A higher proportion of participants with high perceived community control were of male sex, White race, and had a higher socioeconomic position. CONCLUSIONS: Community control and related constructs may be further explored in future intervention development as potentially modifiable social factors that may reduce pain burden.