[Current views on pathogenesis and treatment of neovascular glaucoma]. / Sovremennye vzglyady na patogenez i lechenie neovaskulyarnoi glaukomy.

Neovascular glaucoma is a type of secondary glaucoma characterized by the most severe course, and ranking second among the causes of irreversible blindness. This review summarizes the results of numerous studies devoted to the search for prevention measures and the most effective treatment strategy. The main ways of preventing the development of neovascular glaucoma are timely diagnosis and elimination of ischemic processes in the retina, combined with adequate control of intraocular pressure and treatment of the underlying disease.

Long-term Treatment Patterns for Diabetic Macular Edema: Up to 6-Year Follow-up in the IRIS® Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize anti-VEGF intravitreal therapy (IVT) patterns and long-term visual outcomes among patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in routine clinical practice in the United States. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the American Academy of Ophthalmology's IRIS® (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry. PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-naïve patients with DME (no previous IVT in the past 12 months) initiating anti-VEGF IVT from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2021. METHODS: Baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and long-term visual acuity (VA) outcomes were reported for up to 6 years of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes included the annualized number of injections, change in VA, and anti-VEGF agents. RESULTS: A total of 190 345 eyes met the inclusion criteria. After 1 year of anti-VEGF IVT initiation, eyes received a mean of 3.9 (±2.8) injections and gained +3.2 (±16.4) letters of vision. Of the 1236 eyes with year 6 data, eyes received a mean of 2.9 (±2.1) injections in year 6 and gained +0.5 (±19.7) letters from baseline. The number of injections decreased, and injection intervals increased year over year up to 6 years regardless of baseline VA initiation. The average injection interval was 10 weeks in year 1 and increased to 13.2 weeks in year 2 before plateauing in years 3 to 6 (12.6, 12.3, 12.2, and 12.3 weeks, respectively). Improvements in VA from baseline were greatest in eyes that received 5 or more injections each year. At the end of follow-up, eyes with good baseline vision (>20/25) lost vision, whereas those with worse baseline vision (<20/25) gained vision. Although 51.7% of patients with DME discontinued IVT after a mean of 6 months, 32.8% reinitiated anti-VEGF IVT. Worse VA outcomes were associated with patients of Hispanic ethnicity (-1.08; 95% confidence interval: -1.34, -0.83] compared with non-Hispanic), Medicaid insurance (-1.15; 95% confidence interval: -1.48, -0.81 compared with commercial), and older age (-0.06; 95% confidence interval: -0.07, -0.05] each additional year). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with DME in routine clinical settings receive fewer injections than those in clinical trials and fewer than recommended per the label of US Food and Drug Administration-approved anti-VEGF IVT. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

AI-driven discovery of blood xenobiotic biomarkers in neovascular age-related macular degeneration using iterative random forests.

PURPOSE: To investigate the xenobiotic profiles of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal therapy (IVT) to identify biomarkers indicative of clinical phenotypes through advanced AI methodologies. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, we analyzed 156 peripheral blood xenobiotic features in a cohort of 46 nAMD patients stratified by choroidal neovascularization (CNV) control under anti-VEGF IVT. We employed Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for measurement and leveraged an AI-driven iterative Random Forests (iRF) approach for robust pattern recognition and feature selection, aligning molecular profiles with clinical phenotypes. RESULTS: AI-augmented iRF models effectively refined the metabolite spectrum by discarding non-predictive elements. Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and Ethyl ß-glucopyranoside were identified as significant biomarkers through this process, associated with various clinically relevant phenotypes. Unlike single metabolite classes, drug metabolites were distinctly correlated with subretinal fluid presence. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the enhanced capability of AI, particularly iRF, in dissecting complex metabolomic data to elucidate the xenobiotic landscape of nAMD and environmental impact on the disease. The preliminary biomarkers discovered offer promising directions for personalized treatment strategies, although further validation in broader cohorts is essential for clinical application.

Diabetic Macular Edema Management: A Review of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Therapies.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision impairment in diabetic individuals, characterized by fluid accumulation in the macula due to a breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB). This review article explores the role of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies in the management of DME. Anti-VEGF treatments, including ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept, have revolutionized DME management by targeting VEGF, a key mediator in DME pathogenesis. We critically examined the efficacy of these therapies in reducing macular edema and improving visual acuity, assessed their safety and tolerability, and explored the variability in treatment response. The review highlights the latest advancements and future directions in anti-VEGF therapy, including novel drug delivery systems and emerging treatment paradigms. By providing a comprehensive overview of current anti-VEGF therapies, this review seeks to inform clinical practice, guide future research, and contribute to improved patient outcomes in DME management.

Long-Term Outcomes in Early versus Limited Response to Anti-VEGF Treatment for Retinal Vein Occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: Macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a sight-threatening condition. Previous studies showed that early responders (ERs) who respond well to anti-VEGF injections within 3 months of treatment have better outcomes, as measured by best visual acuity (BVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) at 12 months postinjection initiation compared with limited early responders (LERs). This study analyzed whether ER eyes continue to respond better than LER eyes over longer periods. This study also aimed to identify baseline comorbidities associated with response status. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged > 18 years with RVO-related macular edema treated with anti-VEGF injections. METHODS: Patients were categorized as ERs or LERs. Limited early responder eyes were defined as having CST reduction < 10%, BVA gain < 5 ETDRS letters, or both at 3 months after anti-VEGF initiation. Best visual acuity and CST changes over the 24- and 36-month period after the first anti-VEGF treatment were compared between ERs and LERs. Patient characteristics and systemic comorbidities were identified by chart review. Statistical analysis involved the Levene test, Welch t test, and Welch analysis of variance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best visual acuity and CST changes over the initial 24-month and 36-month periods after treatment. RESULTS: The 24-month cohort included 68 ERs and 39 LERs, and the 36-month cohort included 58 ERs and 33 LERs. At the 24-month time point, there were significant differences in BVA and CST gains between ERs (+19.8 letters, -221.2 um) and LERs (-2.4 letters, -90.1 um; P < 0.001, P < 0.01). Similarly, at 36 months, there were significant differences in BVA and CST gains between ERs (+17.7 letters, -229.3 um) and LERs (+1.3 letters, -128 um; P < 0.001, P < 0.05). After controlling for differences in baseline BVA and CST, only the 24-month change in BVA remained significant (P < 0.001). There were no significant associations between response status and cardiopulmonary, endocrine, and oncologic comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Early responder eyes with branched retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) have better functional responses to anti-VEGF injections at 24 months compared with LER eyes, even after controlling for baseline differences. Early identification of eyes as ERs or LERs in BRVO and CRVO may predict long-term functional prognoses. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Immediate effect of anti-VEGF injections on optic nerve head: Correlation between intraocular pressure and anatomical peripapillary changes.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and radial peripapillary capillaries (RPC) changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography and OCT thickness alterations associated with acutely increased intraocular pressure after intravitreal injections. METHODS: This observational clinical study was conducted on 35 eyes (35 patients) with treatment-naïve age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and type 1 or type 2 MNV were enrolled. All patients underwent anti-vascular endothelial grow factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections with 0.05-mL aflibercept (2 mg) between January 2022 and October 2022. Peripapillary OCT angiography perfusion density, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured before and immediately after intravitreal injections. In particular, the analysis was performed at the following visits: (T0) 5 to 15 min before the injection of aflibercept; (T1) 2 to 5 min after the injection of aflibercept. Paired t-test was used to compare pre-injection and post-injection values. RESULTS: The mean baseline IOP (T0) value was 17.26 ± 2.4 mmHg and the immediate post-injection IOP (T1) mean value was 34.7 ± 11.50 mmHg (P < 0.01). The mean global RNFL thickness before and immediately after the injection was 100.9 ± 18.8 m and 98.6 ± 17.4 m (P = 0.001). Furthermore, the topographical RNFL analysis showed significant thickness reduction of the nasal and inferior sectors after the procedure when compared to T0 (P = 0.046 and P = 0.001). On the contrary, the mean RCP density changes at T1 did not reach statistically significant (P = 0.636). Furthermore, we found a significant negative correlation between the retinal nerve fiber layer global thickness and the IOP changes (Pearson's correlation = -0.126; P = 0.031). In particular, the nasal RNFL region showed a significant negative correlations with IOP values (Pearson's correlation = -0.198, P = 0,046). CONCLUSIONS: We reported acute IOP changes that are associated with reduced RNFL thickness in a group of patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF drugs for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Moreover, topographical sub-analysis revealed that the nasal RNFL region is most prone to IOP fluctuations. This finding may explain the sudden visual acuity change in patients immediately after injection and may sustain injuries to optic nerve head structures producing glaucomatous damage.

Systemic Blood Proteome Patterns Reflect Disease Phenotypes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

There is early evidence of extraocular systemic signals effecting function and morphology in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The prospective, cross-sectional BIOMAC study is an explorative investigation of peripheral blood proteome profiles and matched clinical features to uncover systemic determinacy in nAMD under anti-vascular endothelial growth factor intravitreal therapy (anti-VEGF IVT). It includes 46 nAMD patients stratified by the level of disease control under ongoing anti-VEGF treatment. Proteomic profiles in peripheral blood samples of every patient were detected with LC-MS/MS mass spectrometry. The patients underwent extensive clinical examination with a focus on macular function and morphology. In silico analysis includes unbiased dimensionality reduction and clustering, a subsequent annotation of clinical features, and non-linear models for recognition of underlying patterns. The model assessment was performed using leave-one-out cross validation. The findings provide an exploratory demonstration of the link between systemic proteomic signals and macular disease pattern using and validating non-linear classification models. Three main results were obtained: (1) Proteome-based clustering identifies two distinct patient subclusters with the smaller one (n = 10) exhibiting a strong signature for oxidative stress response. Matching the relevant meta-features on the individual patient's level identifies pulmonary dysfunction as an underlying health condition in these patients. (2) We identify biomarkers for nAMD disease features with Aldolase C as a putative factor associated with superior disease control under ongoing anti-VEGF treatment. (3) Apart from this, isolated protein markers are only weakly correlated with nAMD disease expression. In contrast, applying a non-linear classification model identifies complex molecular patterns hidden in a high number of proteomic dimensions determining macular disease expression. In conclusion, so far unconsidered systemic signals in the peripheral blood proteome contribute to the clinically observed phenotype of nAMD, which should be examined in future translational research on AMD.

Cost consequences of task-shifting intravitreal injections from physicians to nurses in a tertiary hospital in Norway.

BACKGROUND: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor is a medicine administered intravitreally by an injection to maintain visual acuity in patients with a variety of retinal diseases. The demand for this treatment has grown considerably in the westernized world the last two decades and will continue to increase due to an aging population. Because of the high volume, injections seize enormous resources and represent high costs for both hospitals and society. Task-shifting of injections from physicians to nurses may be a means to reduce such costs, however the magnitude of possible savings has been poorly investigated. To this end we investigated changes in the hospital costs per injection, six-year cost projections of physician- versus nurse-administered injections for a Norwegian tertiary hospital and we compared the societal costs per patient per year. METHODS: Patients (n = 318) were randomized to either physician- or nurse administered injections, and data were prospectively collected. Hospital costs per injection were calculated as the sum of training costs, personnel time and running expenses. The number of injections for the years 2014 - 21 from a Norwegian tertiary hospital was combined with age group specific injection prevalence and population projections to calculate cost projections for 2022 - 27. Societal costs per patient were calculated as the sum of hospital costs, transport costs for patients, caregivers' use of time, costs of ophthalmology consultations and community-based homecare. RESULTS: The hospital costs per injection were 5.5 € higher for physicians compared to nurses (281.6 € versus 276.1 €). Cost projections estimated an annual hospital saving of task-shifting of 48 921 € for 2022 - 27. Societal costs per patient did not differ significantly between the two groups (mean 4988 € vs 5418 €, p = 0.398). CONCLUSION: Task-shifting of injections from physicians to nurses can reduce hospital costs and increase the flexibility of physician resources. The annual savings are modest, but increased demand for injections might increase future cost savings. To achieve future savings for society, organizing ophthalmology consultations and injections on the same day to reduce the number of visits might be a solution. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02359149 (09/02/2015).

Evaluating Adherence to Diabetic Retinopathy Care in an Urban Ophthalmology Clinic Utilizing the Compliance With Annual Diabetic Eye Exams Survey.

Introduction The objective of this study was to identify barriers that affect adherence to the management of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in an urban ophthalmology clinic. Patient beliefs regarding diabetic eye care, transportation to the eye clinic, the COVID-19 pandemic, and treatment with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections were investigated. Materials and methods The original Compliance with Annual Diabetic Eye Exams Survey (CADEES) included 44 statements designed with a 5-point Likert scale to assess patients' beliefs and understanding of their eye health and the importance of diabetic eye examinations. This survey was modified to include additional statements regarding the COVID-19 pandemic and free-response questions about transportation barriers and patients' subjective experiences with PRP or anti-VEGF injections. A total of 365 patients with a diagnosis of any stage of DR from SLUCare Ophthalmology were identified as potential participants to complete the telephone survey. Patients were classified as non-adherent if they did not have a dilated eye examination within the past year, missed a scheduled follow-up appointment for DR care within the past year, or missed an appointment for anti-VEGF injections or PRP. The mean Likert scores for each CADEES statement were compared between the adherent and non-adherent groups using independent samples t-tests. Demographics and clinical indicators were also reported and compared between the two groups. Results Out of 365 patients, 68 completed the modified CADEES. Twenty-nine patients were adherent, and 39 patients were non-adherent. Results from six of the 54 CADEES statements were significantly different between the adherent and non-adherent groups. These statements addressed patients' perception of their eye health, self-confidence in making an eye appointment, knowing someone with diabetic eye complications, self-confidence in controlling blood sugar, ability to use public transportation during the COVID-19 pandemic, and prioritizing eye health during the pandemic. There were no significant differences in clinical indicators or demographics between the adherent and non-adherent groups. Of the participants, 39.7% offered reasons for why transportation to the eye clinic was difficult. Patients suggested three novel reasons for missing eye appointments that were not specifically addressed in the CADEES. Fourteen unique barriers were reported for non-adherence with PRP or anti-VEGF injections. Conclusions The CADEES is a thorough tool for evaluating social barriers impacting adherence with DR appointments in an urban ophthalmology clinic. The survey did not identify any clinical or demographic risk factors for non-adherence in this patient population. Decreased patient self-efficacy may lead to non-adherence with the management of DR. The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the adherence of a small percentage of patients.

Glaucoma progression in patients receiving intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate how often glaucoma and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) occur in the same patient and to evaluate whether glaucoma progression is faster in eyes treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF medications for nAMD. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective real-world data (RWD) consists of medical records of 6314 glaucoma and 2166 nAMD patients treated in 2008-2017 in Tays Eye Centre, Finland. To study glaucoma progression, changes in visual fields (mean deviation [MD], dB/year), IOP (mmHg/year) and fundus photographs (progression, yes/no) were compared in glaucoma eyes with and without anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD and ≥1 year follow-up. RESULTS: During the 10-year period, 147 patients with glaucoma received intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD corresponding to 2% of glaucoma and 7% of nAMD patients. The mean change in MD was -0.70 dB/year (SD 1.8) vs. -0.27 dB/year (SD 1.7) (p = 0.027) in glaucoma eyes with (n = 37) and without (n = 4304) anti-VEGF injections, respectively. In patients with bilateral glaucoma and unilateral nAMD treated with anti-VEGF injections (n = 20), MD declined at -0.62 dB/year (SD 1.9) vs 0.33 dB/year (SD 1.5) (p = 0.654), and glaucoma progression was detected in 14/20 vs 10/20 (p = 0.219) fundus photographs in eyes with anti-VEGF treatment compared with their untreated fellow eyes. CONCLUSION: nAMD and glaucoma were found co-existing in the same eye at rates that were similar to the age-corrected prevalence of the two diseases in the general population. Our results suggest that intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD may accelerate glaucoma progression.