Micturition in the toilet compared with bedpan in laboring Nulliparas: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Bladder overdistension in labor may lead to prolonged postpartum urinary retention. We hypothesized that nulliparas mobilizing to toilet is more likely to achieve satisfactory micturition. METHODS: One hundred sixteen (58 in each arm) term nulliparas in labor with filled bladders were randomized to mobilizing to the toilet or using bedpan to micturate. Primary outcome was satisfactory micturition defined as ultrasound derived post-void bladder volume < 150 ml. Following unsatisfactory micturition, participants crossover to the opposed intervention. Participants were catheterized if after crossover, residual bladder volume was ≥250 ml. RESULTS: Satisfactory micturition rates were 55/58 (95%) vs. 43/58 (74%) RR 1.28 95%CI 1.08-1.51 NNTb 4.8 95%CI 3.0-12.4 P = 0.008, failure to micturate 1/58 (2%) vs. 8/58 (14%) RR 0.13 95%CI 0.02-0.97 NNTb 8.3 95%CI 4.6-38.7 P = 0.047. After cross over following unsatisfactory bladder voiding, satisfactory micturition rates were 0/3 (0%) vs 13/15 (87%) P = 0.024, bladder catheterization rates were 3/58 (5%) vs. 2/58 (4%) RR 95%CI 1.5 (0.26-8.65) P = 0.648, maternal satisfaction with allocated intervention 55/58 (95%) vs. 9/58 (16%) RR 95%CI 6.1 (3.3-11.2) NNTb 95%CI 1.3 (1.1-1.5) P <  0.0001 and preference for mobilizing to the toilet if micturition was needed again during labor 55/58 (95%) vs. 53/58 (92%) for mobilizing to the toilet compared to bedpan use arms respectively. Labor and neonatal outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION: Satisfactory micturition was more frequently achieved with mobilization to the toilet than bedpan use. Women in both arms overwhelmingly prefer to mobilize to the toilet to urinate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with ISRCTN on 17/07/2019 with trial identification number: ISRCTN17787339 . First participant was recruited on 31/07/2019. The last patient was recruited on 18/12/2019.

Washer disinfector and alkaline detergent efficacy against C. difficile on plastic bedpans.

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile is a major cause of infectious antibiotic resistant diarrhea. C. difficile spores are shed in patient stool, are hearty and difficult to kill. Bedpans are often used by patients with C. difficile infections and require proper handling and cleaning or disposal to prevent the transmission of C. difficile spores and other infectious microorganisms into the environment. Disposable bedpans are often used for convenience, which has consequences from an environmental sustainability perspective. AIM: This study evaluates the ability for a washer-disinfector device (WD) to efficaciously clean and disinfect C. difficile spores and Escherichia coli from bedpans for sanitary reuse. METHODS: A commercially available WD device was evaluated for both efficacy and thermal disinfection against C. difficile spores and Escherichia coli using one disinfection cycle per test. Bedpans were not rinsed or dumped prior to placement in the WD. Bedpans were sampled using swabs. Microorganisms were eluted from the swabs and log-kill was calculated. FINDINGS: The average log-kill for C. difficile spores was 3.99 and >7.69 for E. coli. Thermal disinfection results showed an average log kill of 4.31 for C. difficile and >7.23 for E. coli. CONCLUSIONS: The WD was efficacious against both C. difficile spores and E. coli when used according to manufacturer's instructions for use, suggesting a viable alternative to disposable bedpan waste management.

A Project to Increase Nurses' Comfort in Offering Bedpans to Women Laboring With Epidural Analgesia.

OBJECTIVE: To improve nurses' comfort in helping laboring woman void on a bedpan after initiation of epidural analgesia, to increase the frequency of bedpan use in the labor and birth unit, and to decrease the use of continuous indwelling Foley catheters during the intrapartum period. DESIGN: Quality improvement project. SETTING: A single large, midwestern U.S. hospital (>3,000 births annually), where bedpans are infrequently used after epidural placement. PARTICIPANTS: Registered nurses on a labor and birth unit. INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS: A 20-minute educational presentation that included current urinary catheter evidence-based practice, preferential use of bedpans, and methods to help women void successfully was taught to all registered nurses in the author's labor unit. Nurses rated on a scale of 0 (not comfortable at all) to 10 (extremely comfortable) their comfort level at helping a woman with a bedpan. Primary data were collected through a convenience sample of anonymous surveys (n = 52) completed by registered nurses regarding their experience with bedpan and catheter use during labor and their comfort level helping women be successful with voiding. This was followed by a retrospective chart audit for women with term, singleton pregnancies who labored with epidural analgesia. RESULTS: Nurses' comfort levels increased from an average of 5.7 to 7.2 (p = .067). Postepidural bedpan use increased from 5.5% (n = 12) to 19% overall (n = 20; p < .001), with five women using bedpans exclusively. When assisted with bedpan use, 38% (n = 12) of women were able to void 34 of the 53 times it was offered (64%). Use of continuous indwelling Foley catheters decreased from 61.7% (n = 137) to 54.7% (n = 58), and use of intermittent catheterization increased from 30.6% (n = 68) to 37.7% (n = 40). CONCLUSION: When assisted by nurses educated in and comfortable with different voiding techniques, women may be able to avoid medically unnecessary use of urinary catheters during labor.

Reproducible elimination of Clostridium difficile spores using a clinical area washer disinfector in 3 different health care sites.

BACKGROUND: Following a Clostridium difficile infection outbreak, the Infection Prevention and Control team at our institution queried the risk of transmission via bedpans reprocessed in washer disinfectors (WDs). This study's objective was to determine the effectiveness of the mechanical action, detergent, and temperature on the eradication of C difficile spores in 1 type of WD model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three types of reusable bedpans/pots were inoculated with sterile human feces that contained 1 × 10(7) CFU/mL C difficile spores. The 0.3 mL fecal-spore suspension was inoculated in sealed cryovials. These items were reprocessed using the longest wash cycle of WDs in 9 clinical units, and then tested for residual C difficile spores. The number of colonies on each replicate organism detection and counting plate was recorded after anaerobic incubation at 35°C for 48 hours, and the log reduction was calculated. RESULTS: All 9 WDs met the manufacturer's operational specifications. Forty-three (96%) of 45 bedpans had no viable spores (>5.9 log10C difficile spore reduction). Two bedpans had 1 to 2 spores remaining. Viable C difficile spores were isolated from all 9 cryovials. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrated that when operating the WD as stipulated, C difficile spores were satisfactorily eliminated from bedpan surfaces. Temperature alone was insufficient to kill C difficile spores. It also suggested the importance of staff training, machine maintenance, and WD purchase specifications.

Disposable single-use receptacles in a tertiary hospital: A large survey of staff after a hospital-wide implementation.

In March 2014, our 1,100-bed tertiary hospital fully converted from a traditional system of reusable receptacles to a single-use disposable pulp receptacle system. Almost 12 months later, in February 2015, we undertook a large survey questionnaire to investigate user acceptance, perceptions, and any areas for improvement. The disposable pulp receptacle system was seen to be more convenient, more hygienic, and less of a risk in spreading infectious diseases. Occasional human error in its use was featured in the rare negative feedback.

Toward a Safer and Cleaner Way: Dealing With Human Waste in Healthcare.

Organizations must evaluate their infection control plans in a holistic and inclusive manner to continue reducing healthcare-associated infection (HAI) rates, including giving consideration to the manner of collecting and disposing of patient waste. Manual washing of bedpans and other containers poses a risk of spreading infection via caregivers, the environment, and the still-contaminated bedpan. Several alternative disposal methods are available and have been tested in some countries for decades, including options such as bedpan washer-disinfector machines, macerator machines, and disposable bedpans. This article reviews methods and issues related to human waste disposal in healthcare settings. Healthcare organizations must evaluate the options thoroughly and then consistently implement the option most in line with its goals and culture.

Evaluation of excreta management in a large French multi-hospital institution.

BACKGROUND: Excreta are a major source of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae including strains that produce extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL). The increase of ESBL incidence in Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) hospitals prompted an evaluation of the equipment and practices used to dispose of excreta. AIM: To evaluate the use of equipment for the management of excreta and to review practices of healthcare workers in their disposal. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2012. FINDINGS: A total of 28 AP-HP hospitals including 536 units (342 acute care units and 194 rehabilitation and long-term care units) were evaluated. Among the patients on the day of the survey, 5697 (43%) wore diapers and 1767 (13%) were using a bedpan. Sixty-one percent of the beds were equipped with shared toilets and 43% of the toilets were equipped with hand sprayers, a device favouring the spread of faecal material in the environment. Sixty eight percent of the units were equipped with bedpan washer-disinfectors. Only 52% of the bedpan washer-disinfectors were located in rooms where alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) were available. In 71% of the units the bedpan was rinsed before disinfection, mostly in the patient's bathroom (62%). Finally, only 9% of questioned healthcare workers said they followed an educational programme about excreta disposal. CONCLUSION: This survey shows that, in the field of multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae control and the promotion of hand hygiene with ABHRs, excreta management is a concerning but neglected subject.

Patient experience with bedpans in acute care: a cross-sectional study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To describe individual experiences of patients using the bedpan in an acute care setting. BACKGROUND: Patients describe the use of the bedpan often as uncomfortable and painful, and nurses mention difficulties using standard-sized bedpans for obese patients or removing a bedpan without soiling the bed. Although the bedpan is still regularly used in hospitals, there are few empirical studies that confirm these experiences. DESIGN: A descriptive quantitative research design. METHODS: A convenience sample of 78 patients was recruited, and data were collected using a standardised questionnaire (German version of the Bedpan Ongemak Schaal). Descriptive statistics were used to analyse frequency (scale A) and extent of inconvenient experiences (scale B). Internal consistency of the scales was tested using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: A major finding of the study was that most patients felt dependent on other persons and no autonomous movement was possible on the bedpan. Patients were frequently confronted with pain, inconvenient characteristics of the bedpan (e.g. coldness, hardness), uncomfortable positions and hygiene inconveniences (e.g. wet backside, fear that urination may miss the bedpan). CONCLUSION: As the bedpan is still regularly used in acute care hospitals, innovations in bedpan models are necessary to address the problems. But there are also several courses of action nurses should consider when caring for patients who are dependent on the bedpan. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: The discomfort of the bedpan, the feeling of dependency and embarrassment could lead to undesirable patient reactions, such as avoidance of fluid intake or leaving the bed. If nurses know the reasons for this behaviour, they could meet these problems with empathetic understanding.