Radio-pathological characteristics of primary neuroendocrine breast carcinoma: Series of 4 cases.

Neuroendocrine breast cancers (NEBCs) are a rare and distinct subtype of breast tumors, characterized by their neuroendocrine differentiation. Despite accounting for less than 1% of all breast cancers, NEBCs present unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their heterogeneous nature and variable prognosis. Accurate imaging plays a crucial role in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and follow-up of NEBCs, yet remains a complex area due to the rarity of these tumors and overlapping features with more common breast cancers. We present a series of 4 cases of primary NEBC, emphasizing the imaging features and their histopathological correlations. All patients presented with breast lump. Diagnostic Mammography followed by Ultrasound was performed in each case. All 4 cases were categorized as Breast Imaging- Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS)-4. Trucut biopsy was performed and histopathological analysis revealed the diagnosis of NEBC. Patients underwent Surgery followed by Chemotherapy, Hormonal Therapy or Radiation therapy alone or in combination with each other depending upon the histopathological characteristics.

Age­integrated breast imaging reporting and data system assessment model to improve the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis.

Early diagnosis is an effective strategy for decreasing breast cancer mortality. Ultrasonography is one of the most predominant imaging modalities for breast cancer owing to its convenience and non-invasiveness. The present study aimed to develop a model that integrates age with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon to improve diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in breast cancer. This retrospective study comprised two cohorts: A training cohort with 975 female patients from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (Wuhan, China) and a validation cohort with 500 female patients from Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province (Wuhan, China). Logistic regression was used to construct a model combining BI-RADS score with age and to determine the age-based prevalence of breast cancer to predict a cut-off age. The model that integrated age with BI-RADS scores demonstrated the best performance compared with models based solely on age or BI-RADS scores, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.872 (95% CI: 0.850-0.894, P<0.001). Furthermore, among participants aged <30 years, the prevalence of breast cancer was lower than the lower limit of the reference range (2%) for BI-RADS subcategory 4A lesions but within the reference range for BI-RADS category 3 lesions, as indicated by linear regression analysis. Therefore, it is recommended that management for this subset of participants are categorized as BI-RADS category 3, meaning that biopsies typically indicated could be replaced with short-term follow-up. In conclusion, the integrated assessment model based on age and BI-RADS may enhance accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosing breast lesions and young patients with BI-RADS subcategory 4A lesions may be exempted from biopsy.

Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Automated Breast Ultrasound (AB US) has shown good application value and prospects in breast disease screening and diagnosis. The aim of the study was to explore the ability of AB US to detect and diagnose mammographically Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 microcalcifications. METHODS: 575 pathologically confirmed mammographically BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications from January 2017 to June 2021 were included. All patients also completed AB US examinations. Based on the final pathological results, analyzed and summarized the AB US image features, and compared the evaluation results with mammography, to explore the detection and diagnostic ability of AB US for these suspicious microcalcifications. RESULTS: 250 were finally confirmed as malignant and 325 were benign. Mammographic findings including microcalcifications morphology (61/80 with amorphous, coarse heterogeneous and fine pleomorphic, 13/14 with fine-linear or branching), calcification distribution (189/346 with grouped, 40/67 with linear and segmental), associated features (70/96 with asymmetric shadow), higher BI-RADS category with 4B (88/120) and 4 C (73/38) showed higher incidence in malignant lesions, and were the independent factors associated with malignant microcalcifications. 477 (477/575, 83.0%) microcalcifications were detected by AB US, including 223 malignant and 254 benign, with a significantly higher detection rate for malignant lesions (x2 = 12.20, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed microcalcifications with architectural distortion (odds ratio [OR] = 0.30, P = 0.014), with amorphous, coarse heterogeneous and fine pleomorphic morphology (OR = 3.15, P = 0.037), grouped (OR = 1.90, P = 0.017), liner and segmental distribution (OR = 8.93, P = 0.004) were the independent factors which could affect the detectability of AB US for microcalcifications. In AB US, malignant calcification was more frequent in a mass (104/154) or intraductal (20/32), and with ductal changes (30/41) or architectural distortion (58/68), especially with the both (12/12). BI-RADS category results also showed that AB US had higher sensitivity to malignant calcification than mammography (64.8% vs. 46.8%). CONCLUSIONS: AB US has good detectability for mammographically BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications, especially for malignant lesions. Malignant calcification is more common in a mass and intraductal in AB US, and tend to associated with architectural distortion or duct changes. Also, AB US has higher sensitivity than mammography to malignant microcalcification, which is expected to become an effective supplementary examination method for breast microcalcifications, especially in dense breasts.

The application of computer-aided diagnosis in Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ultrasound training for residents-a randomized controlled study.

Background: The consistency of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification among experienced radiologists is different, which is difficult for inexperienced radiologists to master. This study aims to explore the value of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) (AI-SONIC breast automatic detection system) in the BI-RADS training for residents. Methods: A total of 12 residents who participated in the first year and the second year of standardized resident training in Ningbo No. 2 Hospital from May 2020 to May 2021 were randomly divided into 3 groups (Group 1, Group 2, Group 3) for BI-RADS training. They were asked to complete 2 tests and questionnaires at the beginning and end of the training. After the first test, the educational materials were given to the residents and reviewed during the breast imaging training month. Group 1 studied independently, Group 2 studied with CAD, and Group 3 was taught face-to-face by experts. The test scores and ultrasonographic descriptors of the residents were evaluated and compared with those of the radiology specialists. The trainees' confidence and recognition degree of CAD were investigated by questionnaire. Results: There was no statistical significance in the scores of residents in the first test among the 3 groups (P=0.637). After training and learning, the scores of all 3 groups of residents were improved in the second test (P=0.006). Group 2 (52±7.30) and Group 3 (54±5.16) scored significantly higher than Group 1 (38±3.65). The consistency of ultrasonographic descriptors and final assessments between the residents and senior radiologists were improved (κ3 > κ2 > κ1), with κ2 and κ3 >0.4 (moderately consistent with experts), and κ1 =0.225 (fairly agreed with experts). The results of the questionnaire showed that the trainees had increased confidence in BI-RADS classification, especially Group 2 (1.5 to 3.5) and Group 3 (1.25 to 3.75). All trainees agreed that CAD was helpful for BI-RADS learning (Likert scale score: 4.75 out of 5) and were willing to use CAD as an aid (4.5, max. 5). Conclusions: The AI-SONIC breast automatic detection system can help residents to quickly master BI-RADS, improve the consistency between residents and experts, and help to improve the confidence of residents in the classification of BI-RADS, which may have potential value in the BI-RADS training for radiology residents. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400081672).

A Prospective Multicenter Study on the Additive Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Biopsy Decision of Ultrasound BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: The main aim of this study was to determine whether the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) could improve the categorization of suspicious breast lesions based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), thereby reducing the number of benign breast lesions referred for biopsy. METHODS: This prospective study, conducted between January 2017 and December 2018, enrolled consenting patients from eight teaching hospitals in China, who had been diagnosed with solid breast lesions classified as BI-RADS 4 using conventional ultrasound. CEUS was performed within 1 wk of diagnosis for reclassification of breast lesions. Histopathological results obtained from core needle biopsies or surgical excision samples served as the reference standard. The simulated biopsy rate and cancer-to-biopsy yield were used to compare the accuracy of CEUS and conventional ultrasound (US). RESULTS: Among the 1490 lesions diagnosed as BI-RADS 4 with conventional ultrasound, 486 malignant and 1004 benign lesions were confirmed based on histology. Following CEUS, 2, 395, and 211 lesions were reclassified as CEUS-based BI-RADS 2, 3, and 5, respectively, while 882 (59%) remained as BI-RADS 4. The actual cancer-to-biopsy yield based on US was 32.6%, which increased to 43.4% when CEUS-based BI-RADS 4A was used as the cut-off point to recommend biopsy. The simulated biopsy rate decreased to 73.4%. Overall, in this preselected BI-RADS 4 population, only 2.5% (12/486) of malignant lesions would have been miscategorized as BI-RADS 3 using CEUS-based reclassification. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of contrast-enhanced ultrasound reclassification were 57.65%, 97.53%, and 38.35%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our collective findings indicate that CEUS is a valuable tool in further triage of BI-RADS category 4 lesions and facilitates a reduction in the number of biopsies while increasing the cancer-to-biopsy yield.

The utility of quantifying the orientation of breast masses in ultrasound imaging.

The aim of this study was to quantify the orientation of breast masses and determine whether it can enhance the utility of a not parallel orientation in predicting breast mass malignancy. A total of 15,746 subjects who underwent breast ultrasound examinations were initially enrolled in the study. Further evaluation was performed on subjects with solid breast masses (≤ 5 cm) intended for surgical resection and/or biopsy. The orientation angle, defined as the acute angle between the align of the maximal longitudinal diameter of the breast mass and the surface of the breast skin, was measured. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted, and various performance measures including sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, odds ratio, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine if the orientation angle was an independent predictor of breast malignancy. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was also conducted to assess the net benefit of adopting the orientation angle for predicting breast mass malignancy. The final analysis included 83 subjects with breast cancer and 135 subjects with benign masses. The intra-group correlation coefficient for the measurement of the orientation angle of breast masses was 0.986 (P = 0.001), indicating high reproducibility. The orientation angles of malignant and benign breast masses were 36.51 ± 14.90 (range: 10.7-88.6) degrees and 15.28 ± 8.40 (range: 0.0-58.7) degrees, respectively, and there was a significant difference between them (P < 0.001). The cutoff value for the orientation angle was determined to be 22.9°. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, odds ratio, and AUC for the prediction of breast malignancy using the orientation angle were 88.0%, 87.4%, 81.1%, 92.2%, 87.6%, 50.67%, and 0.925%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the orientation angle (> 22.9°), not circumscribed margin, and calcifications of the breast mass were independent factors predicting breast malignancy. The net benefit of adopting the orientation angle for predicting breast malignancy was 0.303. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that quantifying the orientation angle of breast masses is useful in predicting breast malignancy, as it demonstrates high sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and standardized net benefit. It optimizes the utility of the not parallel orientation in assessing breast mass malignancy.

Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System evaluation of breast lesions improved with virtual touch tissue imaging average grayscale values.

BACKGROUND: Early breast cancer diagnosis is of great clinical importance for selecting treatment options, improving prognosis, and enhancing the quality of patients' survival. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the value of virtual touch tissue imaging average grayscale values (VAGV) helper Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) in diagnosing breast malignancy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 141 breast tumors in 134 patients. All breast lesions were diagnosed pathologically by biopsy or surgical excision. All patients first underwent conventional ultrasound (US) followed by virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI). The measurement of the VAGV of the lesion was performed by Image J software. BI-RADS classification was performed for each lesion according to the US. We performed a two-by-two comparison of the diagnostic values of VAGV, BI-RADS, and BI-RADS+VAGV. RESULTS: VAGV was lower in malignant tumors than in benign ones (35.82 ± 13.39 versus 73.58 ± 42.69, P< 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value, sensitivity, and specificity of VAGV was 0.834, 84.09%, and 69.07%, respectively. Among BI-RADS, VAGV, and BI-RADS+VAGV, BI-RADS+VAGV had the highest AUC (0.926 versus 0.882, P= 0.0066; 0.926 versus 0.834, P= 0.0012). There was perfect agreement between the two radiologists using VAGV (ICC= 0.9796) and substantial agreement using BI-RADS (Kappa= 0.725). CONCLUSION: Our study shows that VAGV can accurately diagnose breast cancer. VAGV effectively improves the diagnostic performance of BI-RADS.

Exploring the Relationship Between CD 166 Expression and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Scores in Breast Cancer Patients and Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: This research embarked on a crucial endeavor to clarify the connection between levels of CD166 expression and the established Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) grading system. Through a comprehensive exploration of this correlation, the objective was to ascertain if CD166 could function as an additional biomarker, enhancing the predictive effectiveness of the BI-RADS classification. METHOD: This prospective observational study involved 81 women with histopathologically confirmed early breast tumors and 81 radiologically confirmed healthy breast volunteers. The BI-RADS scores of all the participants included in the study were recorded. Before starting treatment, serum, saliva, and urine samples were collected. The CD166 levels were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: The study involved the analysis and comparison of the mean and standard deviations of CD166 expression in serum, saliva, and urine across various BI-RADS categories. Notably, statistically significant differentiation was found (p=0.00) across all samples spanning the spectrum of BI-RADS categories. CONCLUSION: A progressive rise in CD166 concentration coincides with the increasing gradient of the BI-RADS category, implying a possible link between CD166 and breast cancer progression and severity.

Preoperative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings for Prediction of Lymphovascular Invasion of the Lesions in Node-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer.

Purpose: Our single-center retrospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) findings and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status of the lesions in patients with clinically-radiologically lymph node-negative invasive breast cancer. Methods: A total of 250 breast lesions diagnosed in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging were identified. All patients were divided into 2 subgroups: LVI-negative and LVI-positive according to the pathological findings of surgical specimens. The 2 groups' DCE-MRI findings, ADC values, and histopathological results of lesions were compared. Results: LVI was detected in 100 of 250 lesions. Younger age than 45 years and larger lesion size than 20 mm were found to be associated with the presence of LVI (P < .001). High histological and nuclear grade (P = .001), HER2-enriched molecular subtype (P = .001), and Ki-67 positivity (P = .016) were significantly associated with LVI. The LVI positivity rate was significantly higher in the lesions with medium-rapid initial phase kinetic curve and washout delayed phase kinetic curve (P = .001). The presence of LVI was significantly associated with the presence of peritumoral edema, sentinel lymph node metastasis, adjacent vessel sign, and increased whole breast vascularity (P < .001). When diffusion-weighted imaging findings were evaluated, it was determined that tumoral ADC values lower than 1068 × 10-6 mm2/second (P = .002) and peritumoral-tumoral ADC ratios higher than 1.5 (P = .001) statistically increased the probability of LVI. Conclusion: The patient's age, various histopathological and DCE-MRI findings, tumoral ADC value, and peritumoral-tumoral ADC ratio may be useful in the preoperative prediction of LVI status in breast cancer lesions.

Value of inversion imaging to diagnosis in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the added value of inversion imaging in differentiating between benign and malignant breast masses when combined with the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). METHODS: A total of 364 patients with 367 breast masses (151 benign and 216 malignant) who underwent conventional ultrasound and inversion imaging prior to breast surgery were included. A 5-point inversion score (IS) scale was proposed based on the masses' internal echogenicity and distribution characteristics in the inversion images. The combination of IS and BI-RADS was compared with BI-RADS alone to evaluate the value of inversion imaging for breast mass diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of the BI-RADS and its combination with IS for breast masses were analyzed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: The IS for malignant breast masses (3.96 ± 0.77) was significantly higher than benign masses (2.58 ± 0.98) (P < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of BI-RADS were 86.1%, 81.5%, 84.2%, 86.9%, and 80.4%, respectively, and an AUC was 0.909. By compared with BI-RADS, 72 breast masses were downgraded from suspected malignancy to benign, and 6 masses were upgraded from benign to suspected malignancy. Thus, the specificity was increased from 81.5 to 84.8%, it allows 72 benign masses avoid biopsy. CONCLUSION: The combination of inversion imaging with BI-RADS can effectively improve the diagnostic efficacy of breast masses, and inversion imaging could help benign masses avoid biopsy.

Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant BI-RADS 4 Breast Masses by Contrastenhanced Ultrasound Combined with Shear Wave Elastography.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer, one of the most prevalent malignant tumors in females, usually occurs in the breast epithelial tissues. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to explore the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses in BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) 4. METHODS: Examination outcomes and clinical information of 83 patients with BI-RADS 4 breast masses were analyzed retrospectively. These included patients who received CEUS, SWE, and pathological examinations. The difference of CEUS in determining the classification of BI-RADS 4 breast masses was evaluated using histopathological outcomes of breast masses as a reference standard. The diagnostic value of CEUS, SWE, and CEUS combined with SWE in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses in BI-RADS 4 was also explored. RESULTS: Pathological biopsy results revealed 63 malignant masses and 20 benign masses among 83 BI-RADS 4 breast masses, with a 75.9% incidence of malignant masses. After the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast masses with CEUS, SWE, and CEUS+SWE, the incidence of malignancy was 56.6%, 78.3%, and 73.5%, respectively. CEUS+SWE showed higher sensitivity (93.7% vs. 81% and 68.3%), specificity (90% vs. 30% and 80%), positive predictive value (96.7% vs. 78.5% and 91.5%), negative predictive value (81.8% vs. 33.3% and 44.4%), and diagnostic coincidence rate (92.8% vs. 68.7% and 71.1%) than SWE and CEUS alone in diagnosing pathological type of breast masses. Moreover, CEUS combined with SWE exhibited a larger area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (0.918) than SWE (0.741, p = 0.028) and CEUS (0.555, p < 0.001) alone in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast masses. CONCLUSION: Overall, the diagnostic value of CEUS+SWE for the pathological type of BI-RADS is preferred over CEUS and SWE alone. CEUS+SWE showed higher values than CEUS and SWE alone in diagnosing BI-RADS 4 breast masses. Specifically, CEUS+SWE can correctly identify benign and malignant masses, reduce unnecessary trauma, and avoid misdiagnosis. In summary, CEUS combined with SWE can serve as an effective diagnostic method and avoid delaying the best treatment opportunity for some malignant lesions.

Quantitative evaluation of Kaiser score in diagnosing breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for patients with high-grade background parenchymal enhancement.

Background: High-grade background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), including moderate and marked, poses a considerable challenge for the diagnosis of breast disease due to its tendency to increase the rate of false positives and false negatives. The purpose of our study was to explore whether the Kaiser score can be used for more accurate assessment of benign and malignant lesions in high-grade BPE compared with the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) scans from 2 medical centers. Included were patients who underwent DCE-MRI demonstrating high-grade BPE and who had a pathology-confirmed diagnosis. Excluded were patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or who had undergone biopsy prior to MRI examination. Two physicians with more than 7 years of experience specializing in breast imaging diagnosis jointly reviewed breast magnetic resonance (MR) images. The Kaiser score was used to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the BI-RADS from different BPE groups and different enhancement types. The performance of the Kaiser score and BI-RADS were compared according to diagnostic accuracy. Results: A total of 126 cases of high-grade BPE from 2 medical centers were included in this study. The Kaiser score had a higher specificity and PPV than did the BI-RADS (87.5% vs. 46.3%) as well as a higher PPV (94.3% vs. 79.8%). The value of diagnostic accuracy and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the Kaiser score (accuracy 0.928; 95% CI: 0.883-0.973) was larger than that for BI-RADS (accuracy 0.810; 95% CI: 0.741-0.879). Moreover, the Kaiser score had a significantly higher value of diagnostic accuracy for both mass and non-mass enhancement, especially mass lesions (Kaiser score: accuracy 0.947, 95% CI: 0.902-0.992; BI-RADS: accuracy 0.821, 95% CI: 0.782-0.860), with a P value of 0.006. Conclusions: The Kaiser score is a useful diagnostic tool for the evaluation of high-grade BPE lesions, with a higher specificity, PPV, and diagnostic accuracy as compared to the BI-RADS.

Rosai-Dorfman disease of the breast: a clinicoradiologic and pathologic study.

Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) is an uncommon histiocytic disorder typically involving lymph nodes and less frequently extranodal tissues. RDD involving the breast is rare and may clinically and radiologically mimic neoplastic and non-neoplastic disorders. We report seven patients with breast RDD, describe their clinicoradiologic and pathologic features, and discuss the differential diagnosis. Patients, ranging from 15 to 74 years of age, presented with unilateral and unifocal (5/7) or bilateral and multifocal (2/7) masses. RDD was either confined to the breast (6/7) or concurrently involved a lymph node (1/7). Masses ranged from 8 to 31 mm, categorized as Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 (6/7) or 5 (1/7). All cases showed similar morphology with many large histiocytes displaying emperipolesis with associated fibrosis and dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. The abnormal histiocytes co-expressed CD68/CD163, S100, OCT2, and Cyclin D1 (7/7), and were negative for CK AE1/AE3 (7/7), CD1a (7/7), and BRAF V600E (6/6). Flow cytometry (n = 3), kappa/lambda in situ hybridization (n = 5), and IgG4/IgG immunohistochemistry (n = 1) did not reveal lymphoma or IgG4-related disease. No mycobacterial or fungal organisms were identified on acid-fast bacillus (AFB) and Grocott methenamine silver (GMS) stains (n = 5). Three patients underwent complete excision and none recurred or progressed to systemic disease during follow-up (88-151 months). In summary, breast RDD should be included in the differential diagnosis of a mass-forming breast lesion. Histopathology with ancillary studies and clinicoradiologic correlation is essential for accurate diagnosis and optimal clinical management. Patients with RDD of the breast have an excellent prognosis after complete excision.

Vacuum-assisted biopsy system for breast lesions: a potential therapeutic approach.

Purpose: The primary objective is to optimize the population eligible for Mammotome Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) by refining selection criteria. This involves maximizing procedure benefits, minimizing malignancy risk, and reducing the rate of malignant outcomes. Patients and methods: A total of 1158 female patients who came to our hospital from November 2016 to August 2021 for the Mammotome MIS were analyzed retrospectively. Following χ2 tests to screen for risk variables, binary logistic regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictors of malignant lesions. In addition, the correlation between age and lesion diameter was investigated for BI-RADS ultrasound (US) category 4a lesions in order to better understand the relationship between these variables. Results: The malignancy rates of BI-RADS US category 3, category 4a and category 4b patients who underwent the Mammotome MIS were 0.6% (9/1562), 6.4% (37/578) and 8.3% (2/24) respectively. Malignant lesions were more common in patients over the age of 40, have visible blood supply, and BI-RADS category 4 of mammography. In BI-RADS US category 4a lesions, the diameter of malignant tumor was highly correlated with age, and this correlation was strengthened in patients over the age of 40 and with BI-RADS category 4 of mammography. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that the clinical data and imaging results, particularly age, blood supply, and mammography classification, offer valuable insights to optimize patients' surgical options and decrease the incidence of malignant outcomes.

High-temporal resolution DCE-MRI improves assessment of intra- and peri-breast lesions categorized as BI-RADS 4.

BACKGROUND: BI-RADS 4 breast lesions are suspicious for malignancy with a range from 2 to 95%, indicating that numerous benign lesions are unnecessarily biopsied. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether high-temporal-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (H_DCE-MRI) would be superior to conventional low-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI (L_DCE-MRI) in the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. METHODS: This single-center study was approved by the IRB. From April 2015 to June 2017, patients with breast lesions were prospectively included and randomly assigned to undergo either H_DCE-MRI, including 27 phases, or L_DCE-MRI, including 7 phases. Patients with BI-RADS 4 lesions were diagnosed by the senior radiologist in this study. Using a two-compartment extended Tofts model and a three-dimensional volume of interest, several pharmacokinetic parameters reflecting hemodynamics, including Ktrans, Kep, Ve, and Vp, were obtained from the intralesional, perilesional and background parenchymal enhancement areas, which were labeled the Lesion, Peri and BPE areas, respectively. Models were developed based on hemodynamic parameters, and the performance of these models in discriminating between benign and malignant lesions was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included in the study and underwent H_DCE-MRI (n = 62) or L_DCE-MRI (n = 78) scans; 56 of these 140 patients had BI-RADS 4 lesions. Some pharmacokinetic parameters from H_DCE-MRI (Lesion_Ktrans, Kep, and Vp; Peri_Ktrans, Kep, and Vp) and from L_DCE-MRI (Lesion_Kep, Peri_Vp, BPE_Ktrans and BPE_Vp) were significantly different between benign and malignant breast lesions (P < 0.01). ROC analysis showed that Lesion_Ktrans (AUC = 0.866), Lesion_Kep (AUC = 0.929), Lesion_Vp (AUC = 0.872), Peri_Ktrans (AUC = 0.733), Peri_Kep (AUC = 0.810), and Peri_Vp (AUC = 0.857) in the H_DCE-MRI group had good discrimination performance. Parameters from the BPE area showed no differentiating ability in the H_DCE-MRI group. Lesion_Kep (AUC = 0.767), Peri_Vp (AUC = 0.726), and BPE_Ktrans and BPE_Vp (AUC = 0.687 and 0.707) could differentiate between benign and malignant breast lesions in the L_DCE-MRI group. The models were compared with the senior radiologist's assessment for the identification of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. The AUC, sensitivity and specificity of Lesion_Kep (0.963, 100.0%, and 88.9%, respectively) in the H_DCE-MRI group were significantly higher than those of the same parameter in the L_DCE-MRI group (0.663, 69.6% and 75.0%, respectively) for the assessment of BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. The DeLong test was conducted, and there was a significant difference only between Lesion_Kep in the H_DCE-MRI group and the senior radiologist (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetic parameters (Ktrans, Kep and Vp) from the intralesional and perilesional regions on high-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI, especially the intralesional Kep parameter, can improve the assessment of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions to avoid unnecessary biopsy.

Value of ultrasound BI­RADS classification in preoperative evaluation of the ultrasound­guided Mammotome­assisted minimally invasive resection of breast masses: A retrospective analysis.

The American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification has been used for the diagnosis of breast masses for several decades and constantly updated, but the terminology used to describe breast ultrasound findings is still evolving and a great amount of large sample data is necessary to verify and improve ultrasound BI-RADS. The objective of the present study was to explore the value of ultrasound Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (US BI-RADS) classification in the preoperative evaluation of the US-guided Mammotome-assisted minimally invasive resection of breast masses. A total of 1,028 patients with 1,341 breast masses from a single hospital were selected for retrospective analysis. All patients underwent minimally invasive resection using a US-guided Mammotome device, and postoperative pathological examinations were performed for all samples. The preoperative US BI-RADS classification and postoperative pathological examination results were compared and analyzed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the preoperative evaluation efficacy of the US BI-RADS classification in US-guided Mammotome-assisted minimally invasive breast mass resection. Among the 1,341 breast masses that underwent resection, 1,307 were benign and 34 were malignant. The specificity, sensitivity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the US BI-RADS classification in the preoperative diagnosis of malignant breast masses were 83.47, 100.00, 83.89, 13.60 and 100.00%, respectively, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.917. It may be concluded that the US BI-RADS classification has a good preoperative diagnostic performance and can provide an accurate assessment prior to Mammotome-assisted minimally invasive resection. It may help surgeons to make reasonable decisions for subsequent therapy and therefore is worthy of further clinical use.

Primary angiosarcoma of the breast: Two case reports and brief review of the literature.

Angiosarcoma is a rare but very aggressive tumor. It occurs in all organs of the body, and approximately 8% of all angiosarcomas arise in the breast. We reported 2 cases of primary breast angiosarcomas in young women. The 2 patients showed similar clinical features, but were quite different in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. The 2 patients were treated with mastectomy and axillary sentinel lymph node dissection and confirmed by post-operative pathological test. We suggested that dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging was the most helpful imaging tool in the diagnosis and pre-operative evaluation of the breast angiosarcoma.

Can magnetic resonance imaging texture analysis change the breast imaging reporting and data system category of breast lesions?

PURPOSE: This study aimed to reveal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) texture analysis (TA)'s contribution to categorizing breast lesions according to the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) lexicon. METHOD: Two hundred and seventeen women with BI-RADS category 3, 4, and 5 lesions on breast MRI were included in the study. For TA, the region of interest was drawn manually to encompass the entire lesion on the fat-suppressed T2W and the first post-contrast T1W images. To identify the independent predictors of breast cancer, multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed using texture parameters. Estimated benign and malignant groups were formed according to the TA regression model. RESULTS: Texture parameters extracted from T2WI, including median, gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) contrast, GLCM correlation, GLCM joint entropy, GLCM sum entropy, and GLCM sum of squares, and parameters extracted from T1WI, including maximum, GLCM contrast, GLCM joint entropy, GLCM sum entropy, were independent predictors of breast cancer. In the estimated new groups according to the TA regression model, 19 (91%) of the benign 4a lesions were downgraded to BI-RADS category 3. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of quantitative parameters obtained by MRI TA to BI-RADS criteria significantly increased the accuracy rate in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. When categorizing BI-RADS 4a lesions, the use of MRI TA in addition to conventional imaging findings may reduce unnecessary biopsy rates.

Combination of ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI-based radiomics and artificial neural network in assessing BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: Potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Objectives: To investigate whether combining radiomics extracted from ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) with an artificial neural network enables differentiation of MR BI-RADS 4 breast lesions and thereby avoids false-positive biopsies. Methods: This retrospective study consecutively included patients with MR BI-RADS 4 lesions. The ultrafast imaging was performed using Differential sub-sampling with cartesian ordering (DISCO) technique and the tenth and fifteenth postcontrast DISCO images (DISCO-10 and DISCO-15) were selected for further analysis. An experienced radiologist used freely available software (FAE) to perform radiomics extraction. After principal component analysis (PCA), a multilayer perceptron artificial neural network (ANN) to distinguish between malignant and benign lesions was developed and tested using a random allocation approach. ROC analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Results: 173 patients (mean age 43.1 years, range 18-69 years) with 182 lesions (95 benign, 87 malignant) were included. Three types of independent principal components were obtained from the radiomics based on DISCO-10, DISCO-15, and their combination, respectively. In the testing dataset, ANN models showed excellent diagnostic performance with AUC values of 0.915-0.956. Applying the high-sensitivity cutoffs identified in the training dataset demonstrated the potential to reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies by 63.33%-83.33% at the price of one false-negative diagnosis within the testing dataset. Conclusions: The ultrafast DCE-MRI radiomics-based machine learning model could classify MR BI-RADS category 4 lesions into benign or malignant, highlighting its potential for future application as a new tool for clinical diagnosis.

Evaluation of breast lesions based on modified BI-RADS using high-resolution readout-segmented diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging and T2/T1-weighted image.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol combining high-resolution diffusion-weighted images (HR-DWI) using readout-segmented echo planar imaging, T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), using our modified Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (modified BI-RADS). METHODS: Two experienced radiologists, blinded to the final pathological diagnosis, categorized a total of 108 breast lesions (61 malignant and 47 benign) acquired with the above protocol using the modified BI-RADS with a diagnostic decision tree. The decision tree included subcategories of category 4, as in mammography (categories 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, and 5). These results were compared with the pathological diagnoses. RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83-0.95) for reader 1, and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.82-0.96) for reader 2. When categories 4C and above were classified as malignant, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 73.8%, 93.6%, and 82.4%, for reader 1; and 82.0%, 89.4%, and 85.2% for reader 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that using HR-DWI, T1WI/T2WI analyzed with a modified BI-RADS and a decision tree showed promising diagnostic performance in breast lesions, and is worthy of further study.