RESUMEN
Introduction C-reactive protein (CRP) is a widely used laboratory test for assessing infections, inflammatory diseases, and malignancies, playing a critical role in clinical diagnosis and management. Despite its utility, CRP measurement practices vary among physicians, often influenced by training and clinical experience. This study explores general physicians' perceptions of CRP measurement in clinical practice, focusing on its diagnostic value, associated dilemmas, and impact on clinical growth and decision-making. Methods This qualitative study employed thematic analysis to examine the perceptions of general physicians at Unnan City Hospital, Unnan, Japan regarding CRP measurement. Sixteen general physicians were selected through purposive sampling and participated in one-on-one semi-structured interviews. The interviews were conducted in Japanese, recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed inductively to identify themes. The analysis involved iterative coding and extensive discussion among the research team to ensure the reliability and validity of the findings. Results Three main themes emerged from the analysis: the usefulness of CRP for diagnosis and collaboration, dilemmas associated with CRP usage, and clinical growth through reconsideration of CRP's importance. Physicians highlighted CRP's value in distinguishing inflammatory from non-inflammatory diseases, predicting clinical courses, and facilitating communication with specialists. However, dilemmas arose from discrepancies between CRP levels and clinical symptoms, the influence of various non-specific factors, and habitual testing driven by training, leading to unnecessary tests and diminished clinical skills. Participants recognized the need to view CRP as one of many diagnostic tools, cultivate a habit of questioning its necessity, and reflect on its use to enhance clinical reasoning and professional growth. Conclusions CRP measurement is a valuable diagnostic tool, but effective use requires a balanced and critical approach. Discrepancies between CRP levels and clinical symptoms can lead to over-reliance on laboratory results and unnecessary testing. General physicians should integrate CRP within a broader diagnostic framework, combining it with patient history, physical examination, and other tests. Reflecting on the necessity and implications of CRP measurements can improve clinical reasoning and decision-making, ultimately enhancing patient care and resource management. Future research should explore similar perceptions in diverse healthcare settings and develop strategies to optimize CRP use in clinical practice.
RESUMEN
Con el objetivo de priorizar políticas públicas para disminuir el consumo de bebidas azucaradas en Argentina, Brasil, El Salvador y Trinidad y Tobago e identificar las necesidades de información relacionadas con la carga de enfermedad atribuible a su consumo se realizó un diálogo de políticas en el que participaron miembros de gobierno, organizaciones de la sociedad civil, investigadores y comunicadores de países de Latinoamérica y el Caribe. Se llevaron a cabo exposiciones y talleres deliberativos utilizándose herramientas de recolección de datos semiestructuradas y discusiones grupales facilitadas. Las intervenciones priorizadas fueron el incremento de impuestos, el etiquetado frontal, la restricción de la publicidad, promoción y patrocinio y las modificaciones del entorno escolar. La principal barrera percibida fue la interferencia de la industria alimentaria. La realización de este diálogo de decisores permitió la identificación de las políticas públicas prioritarias para disminuir el consumo de bebidas azucaradas en la región.
In order to prioritize public policies to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in Argentina, Brazil, El Salvador and Trinidad and Tobago and to identify information gaps related to the burden of disease attributable to their consumption, a policy dialogue was held with government members, civil society organizations, researchers and communicators from Latin American and Caribbean countries. Presentations and deliberative workshops were conducted using semi-structured data collection tools and group discussions. The prioritized interventions were tax increases, front labeling, restriction of advertising, promotion and sponsorship, and modifications regarding the school environment. The main perceived barrier was the interference from the food industry. This dialogue among decision-makers led to the identification of priority public policies to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in the region.