Comparison of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the experimental model of rheumatoid arthritis in rats.

In this study, we wanted to investigate the effectiveness of combining disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in reducing inflammation in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) model using rats. We divided 56 male Sprague-Dawley rats into seven groups and induced RA using complete Freund's adjuvant. Some groups received HBOT, whereas others were given etanercept or leflunomide. We started the treatment on the 10th day after inducing RA and continued it for 18 days. To evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments, we measured paw swelling and used X-rays to examine the joints before and after the treatment. We also analysed the levels of two inflammatory markers, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α and interleukin (IL)-1ß, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Additionally, we conducted histological analysis and assessed the expressions of anti-IL-1ß and anti-TNF-α antibodies. All the treatment groups showed a significant decrease in arthritis scores, paw swelling and levels of TNF-α and IL-1ß. The X-ray images revealed improvements in joint structure, and the histopathological analysis showed reduced inflammation and collagen abnormalities. Combining DMARD with HBOT had similar effects to individual therapies, suggesting a cost-effective and potentially safer approach for improving outcomes in rats with RA.

Comparative efficacy of five approved Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background: The European League of Rheumatology(EULAR)guidelines recommend Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are insensitive or under-responsive to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). But there was no recommendation for which one was preferred in five currently approved JAK inhibitors. The objective of this network meta-analysis study was to evaluate the efficacy of five JAK inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and peficitinib as monotherapy or combined with csDMARD in the treatment of active RA were searched in database of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library, up to December 2023. The control group included placebo or csDMARD. Outcome indicators included American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20), ACR50, ACR70 and the percentage of patients achieving 28-joint disease activity score using C-reactive protein (DAS28(CRP))<2.6 at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. The statistical analysis was performed by Stata14 and RevMan5.4. Data processing, network evidence plots, surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranking, league plots and funnel plots were generated. Risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) as effect sizes to analyze the statistics. Results: This study included thirty-six RCTs with 16,713 patients. All JAK inhibitors were more effective than placebo in ACR20 (RRs ranging between 1.74 and 3.08), ACR50 (RRs ranging between 2.02 and 7.47), ACR70 (RRs ranging between 2.68 and 18.13), DAS28(CRP) < 2.6 (RRs ranging between 2.70 and 7.09) at 12 weeks. Upadacitinib 30 mg and upadacitinib 15 mg showed relatively good efficacy according to their relative SUCRA ranking. All JAK inhibitors were more effective than csDMARD or placebo in ACR20 (RRs ranging between 1.16 and 1.86), ACR50 (RRs ranging between 1.69 and 2.84), ACR70 (RRs ranging between 1.50 and 4.47), DAS28(CRP) < 2.6 (RRs ranging between 2.28 and 7.56) at 24 weeks. Upadacitinib 15 mg + csDMARD and baricitinib 4 mg + csDMARD showed relatively good efficacy according to their relative SUCRA ranking. The safety analysis results such as serious infection, malignancy, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and venous thromboembolic events (VTE) showed no statistical difference. Conclusion: This NMA study indicated that all JAK inhibitors performed better than placebo. Based on the results of this study, upadacitinib 30 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 15 mg + csDMARD and baricitinib 4 mg + csDMARD were recommended treatment options with relatively good efficacy and safety. However, attention should be paid to monitoring the occurrence of adverse events in high-risk RA patients with medication. Combination therapy with csDMARD might be more suitable for the maintenance of long-term efficacy. However, in clinical practice, it is still necessary to select the appropriate therapeutic regimen based on the actual clinical situation.

Incidence and predisposing factors of extra-articular manifestations in contemporary rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis [RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease, with potential for extra-articular manifestations (ExRA). The incidence and predisposing factors for ExRA and the mortality were evaluated in an early RA inception cohort. METHODS: Patients (n = 1468; 69 % females, mean age (SD) 57.3(16.3) years) were consecutively included at the date of diagnosis, between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2016, and assessed prospectively. In December 2016 development of ExRA was evaluated by a patient questionnaire and a review of medical records. Cumulative incidence and incidence rates were compared between 5-year periods and between patients included before and after 1 January 2001. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify predictors for ExRA, and models with ExRA as time-dependent variables to estimate the mortality. RESULTS: After a mean (SD) follow-up of 9.3(4.9) years, 238 cases (23.3 %) had ExRA and 151 (14.7 %) had ExRA without rheumatoid nodules. Most ExRA developed within 5 years from diagnosis. Rheumatoid nodules (10.5 %) and keratoconjunctivitis sicca (7.1 %) were the most frequent manifestations, followed by pulmonary fibrosis (6.1 %). The ExRA incidence among more recently diagnosed patients was similar as to the incidence among patients diagnosed before 2001. Seropositivity, smoking and early biological treatment were associated with development of ExRA. After 15 years 20 % had experienced ExRA. ExRA was associated with increased mortality, HR 3.029 (95 % CI 2.177-4.213). CONCLUSIONS: Early development of ExRA is frequent, particularly rheumatoid nodules. Predisposing factors were age, RF positivity, smoking and early biological treatment. The patients with ExRA had a 3-fold increase in mortality.

Real-world effectiveness of a single conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (cDMARD) plus an anti-TNF agent versus multiple cDMARDs in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective observational study.

Objective: The objective of this prospective, observational multicenter study (NCT03264703) was to compare the effectiveness of single conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (cDMARD) plus anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy versus multiple cDMARD treatments in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following cDMARD failure in the real-world setting in South Korea. Methods: At the treating physicians' discretion, patients received single cDMARD plus anti-TNF therapy or multiple cDMARDs. Changes from baseline in disease activity score 28-joint count with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), corticosteroid use, and Korean Health Assessment Questionnaire (KHAQ-20) scores were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months. Results: Of 207 enrollees, the final analysis included 45 of 73 cDMARD plus anti-TNF and 91 of 134 multiple-cDMARD recipients. There were no significant between-group differences (BGDs) in ANCOVA-adjusted changes from baseline in DAS28-ESR at 3, 6 (primary endpoint), and 12 months (BGDs -0.18, -0.38, and -0.03, respectively). More cDMARD plus anti-TNF than multiple-cDMARD recipients achieved a >50% reduction from baseline in corticosteroid dosage at 12 months (35.7% vs 14.6%; p=0.007). Changes from baseline in KHAQ-20 scores at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly better with cDMARD plus anti-TNF therapy than with multiple cDMARDs (BGD -0.18, -0.19, and -0.19 points, respectively; all p≤0.024). Conclusion: In the real-world setting, relative to multiple cDMARDs, single cDMARD plus anti-TNF therapy significantly improved quality-of-life scores and reduced corticosteroid use, with no significant BGD in disease activity, in RA patients in whom previous cDMARD therapy had failed.

Factors determining resistance to conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Our study was designed to investigate the reasons for starting the conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and the variables that impact the response to DMARD treatment in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients. METHODS: Oligoarticular JIA patients (n = 187) were categorized into two groups: Group A consisted of patients who achieved remission with DMARD, and Group B comprised those who did not respond to DMARD therapy. RESULTS: DMARDs were initiated for various reasons: 68 (36.4%) due to active disease despite nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (± intra-articular corticosteroid) treatment, 59 (31.6%) due to uveitis, 49 (26.2%) due to extended oligoarticular JIA, and 11 (5.9%) due to inflammatory bowel disease. One hundred twenty-three patients (65.8%) achieved remission with DMARDs (Group A), while 64 patients (34.2%) did not respond to DMARD therapy (Group B). In Group B, patients had higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as well as higher Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Disease Activity Scores-71 (JADAS-71) at diagnosis (both p < 0.001). Moreover, extended oligoarticular JIA subtype (p = 0.017) and involvement of small joints at diagnosis (p = 0.043) were more prevalent among these patients. Group A exhibited a higher frequency of antinuclear antibody positivity (p = 0.014). Elevated CRP levels (> 1.1 mg/dL) (OR 1.308, 95% CI 1.203-3.574; p < 0.001) and high JADAS-71 at diagnosis (> 15.8) (OR 1.659, 95% CI 1.179-2.941; p < 0.001) were associated with DMARD resistance. CONCLUSION: Elevated CRP and high JADAS-71 at diagnosis were the main factors associated with DMARD resistance in oligoarticular JIA. Prospective long-term studies may help verify the role of these factors associated with DMARD resistance in oligoarticular JIA. Key Points • Conventional DMARDs were most commonly started due to active disease despite NSAID (± intra-articular corticosteroids). • Remission was achieved with DMARD in 65.8% of oligoarticular JIA patients. • Elevated CRP and high JADAS-71 at diagnosis were associated with DMARD resistance.

Comparison of retention of biologics in Japanese patients with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis-the ANSWER cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This multicentre, retrospective study aimed to compare retention and reasons for discontinuation between Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA). METHODS: Patients with RA enrolled in a Japanese multicentre observational registry between 2015 and 2022 were included. EORA was defined as RA with onset at 60 or over. To adjust confounding factors by indication for initiation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), interleukin-6 inhibitors (IL-6i), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen 4 immunoglobulin (CTLA4-Ig) blockers, or JAKi, a propensity score based on baseline characteristics was used to compare drug retention. To assess the reasons for discontinuation, retention rates for ineffectiveness, adverse events, and remission were analyzed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 572 patients with 835 treatment courses were identified (314 TNFi, 175 IL-6i, 228 CTLA4-Ig, and 118 JAKi). After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, drug retention was significantly higher for IL-6i (HR = 0.38, 95%CI = 0.27-0.55, p< 0.01) as compared with TNFi. Discontinuation due to lack of effectiveness was lower with the JAKi (HR = 0.38, 95%CI = 0.22-0.66, p< 0.01) and the IL-6i (HR = 0.29, 95%CI = 0.19-0.46, p< 0.01) as compared with the TNFi although the CTLA4-Ig had a similar HR to TNFi. The adjusted incidence of discontinuation due to adverse event was higher in the JAKi (HR = 2.86, 95%CI = 1.46-5.59, p< 0.01) than the TNFi. CONCLUSIONS: In EORA patients, IL-6i and JAKi had longer retention and less discontinuation due to ineffectiveness than TNFi. The potential risks of JAKi should be approached with an individualized perspective.

Dose Tapering and Discontinuation of Biologic DMARDs in Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Narrative Review (2023 SPARTAN Annual Meeting Proceedings).

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Limited data is available for tapering or discontinuation of biologic therapy in patients with axSpA who are in disease remission. The current review concentrates on published studies regarding dose tapering or withdrawal of biologics in axSpA. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent evidence in light of randomized controlled trials suggests that tapering of b-DMARDs is a feasible strategy to maintain remission or low disease activity in axSpA patients. TNF inhibitors were the studied biologics in most of these trials. The disease flare rates were comparable to those maintained on standard dose in most of these studies, although with variable tapering strategies and follow-up. Additionally, the duration of disease in remission prior to tapering, studied primary outcome, and flare definitions were heterogeneous. Female sex, HLA-B*27 negativity, high physician global score, and high CRP were negative predictors of successful tapering, but not consistently reported in all the trials. Although designed to address efficacy, there were no safety concerns with b-DMARD tapering. Withdrawal or complete discontinuation of biologics met with increased risk of flares compared to standard dosing. Tapering of TNF inhibitors may be feasible in certain axSpA patients with an acceptable disease state; however, discontinuation is not currently recommended owing to increased risk of flare. Future studies with axSpA patients with longer remission duration prior to taper and different doses and types of b-DMARDs may provide more guidance.

Risk of incident cardiovascular events with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs among adults with rheumatoid arthritis: a nested case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with the disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD: This nested case-control study used the MarketScan database (2012-2014), involving adult RA patients (aged ≥18 years) initiating either a conventional synthetic (cs) DMARD, biologic DMARD, or targeted synthetic (ts) DMARD between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2014 (cohort entry) and had no CVD history. Cases were individuals with incident CVD identified using diagnosis codes or procedure codes from medical claims. For each case, 10 age- and sex-matched controls were selected using the incident density sampling with replacement. Prescriptions of DMARDs were measured 90 days before the event date. Conditional logistic regression examined the association of risk of CVD with DMARDs in combination treatment or individual use, with reference to methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy, adjusting for baseline confounders. Subgroup analyses were performed separately in DMARD combination therapy users or individual DMARD users, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 270 cases of incident CVD and 2700 controls were included (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age: 54 [1]; 75.6% women). The commonly prescribed DMARD therapies were csDMARD monotherapy (n = 795, 27.04%), followed by  tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) monotherapy (n = 367, 12.48%), and TNFi in combination with MTX (n = 314, 10.68%). Compared with MTX monotherapy, overall use of DMARD agents was not associated with the differential risk of CVD, including various types of DMARD combination regimens. The findings were similar across subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: The study found no differential risk of CVD with DMARDs in combination therapy or monotherapy compared to MTX monotherapy in patients with RA. Key Points • This study evaluated the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with the disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). • Findings suggest no differential CVD risk with DMARDs in combination with MTX or used individually compared with MTX monotherapy in patients with early RA. • Further efforts should focus on a better understanding of the mechanism of DMARD combination treatments with MTX in modifying CV risk.

Development of a nursing practice scale for rheumatoid arthritis treatment with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to develop a nursing practice scale for rheumatoid arthritis treatment with biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. METHODS: An anonymous self-administered questionnaire survey was administered to 1826 nurses, 960 of whom were Certified Nurses by Japan Rheumatism Foundation (CNJRFs) and 866 were registered nurses (RNs). Using exploratory factor analysis, criterion validity, and known-groups technique, we assessed the reliability and validity of the self-created 19-item nursing practice scale to evaluate the care provided to patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs based on the nurse's role as clarified from a literature review of relevant studies. RESULTS: A total of 698 (38.4%) responses were collected from 407 CNJRFs and 291 RNs. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on 18 items to examine three factors: 'nursing to enhance patients' capacity for self-care', 'nursing in which patients participate in decision-making', and 'nursing in which team medical care is promoted'. Cronbach's α was .95. The Spearman's coefficient was ρ = .738 for criterion validity. Using the known-groups technique, CNJRFs had higher total scale scores than RNs (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The results confirmed the reliability, criterion validity, and construct validity of the scale.

Start RA treatment - Biologics or JAK-inhibitors?

Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have been approved for the treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) for several years. They are the first oral advanced treatment with efficacy similar to, if not greater than, biologic agents. Recently, concerns over their safety was raised by the results from Oral Surveillance trial suggesting that tofacitinib, one of the JAKi, was associated with higher cardiovascular adverse events and malignancies than TNF inhibitors (TNFi). Since then, regulatory authorities have added warnings to the labels of JAKi. On this purpose, whether rheumatologists should use JAKi as first line advance treatment has become a controversial topic. Some rheumatologists have argued that biologics should be first line advance treatment since there are extensive effectiveness and safety data. In addition, with the advent of biosimilar drugs, they are the most cost-effective treatment. On the other hand, JAKi are very efficacious and are generally safe apart from older and high-risk patients. When TNFi are contraindicated and in certain RA patients ,especially when an oral drug is preferable, JAKi have significant advantage providing patients are involved in the decision-making process.

The Effects of Periodontal Treatment on Rheumatoid Arthritis and of Anti-Rheumatic Drugs on Periodontitis: A Systematic Review.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and periodontitis are chronic inflammatory diseases that widely spread and share the same patterns of pro-inflammatory cytokines. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effects of non-surgical periodontal treatment (NSPT) on RA and, conversely, the impact of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on periodontitis. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched using the MESH terms "periodontitis" and "rheumatoid arthritis" from January 2012 to September 2023. A total of 49 articles was included in the final analysis, 10 of which were randomized controlled trials. A total of 31 records concerns the effect of NSPT on parameters of RA disease activity, including a 28-joint disease activity score, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, rheumatoid factor, C reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, pro-inflammatory cytokines and acute phase proteins in serum, saliva, gingival crevicular fluid, and synovial fluid. A total of 18 articles investigated the effect of DMARDs on periodontal indexes and on specific cytokine levels. A quality assessment and risk-of-bias of the studies were also performed. Despite some conflicting results, there is evidence that RA patients and periodontitis patients benefit from NSPT and DMARDs, respectively. The limitations of the studies examined are the small samples and the short follow-up (usually 6 months). Further research is mandatory to evaluate if screening and treatment of periodontitis should be performed systematically in RA patients, and if the administration of DMARDs is useful in reducing the production of cytokines in the periodontium.

Current Immunosuppressive Treatment for Takayasu Arteritis.

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a rare disease characterized by inflammation of large blood vessels, which results in vascular stenosis, occlusion, and aneurysm formation. The principal treatment has been glucocorticoids, but the recent emergence of biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), represented by tocilizumab (TCZ), has significantly changed the treatment landscape. Both cardiologists and cardiovascular surgeons will encounter patients receiving these drugs who require catheterization, other invasive procedures, or surgery. Several bDMARDs have shown promise against TAK in clinical studies and their use is expected to increase in the future. Janus kinase inhibitors may also be effective. Here, we review the evidence supporting the use of TCZ and other immunosuppressants in TAK and provides an update on their status as well as the relevant guidelines.

Comparison between rheumatoid arthritis with malignant lymphoma and other malignancies: Analysis of a National Database of Rheumatic Disease in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The background status and the current treatment options of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who develop malignant lymphoma (ML) and other malignancies are unclear. This study investigated the differences in background factors between ML and other malignancies that occur in RA patients and post-malignancy treatment. METHODS: We identified 935 RA patients with new-onset malignancies among 110,571 person-years registered in the National Database of Rheumatic Disease in Japan from 2012 to 2018. Analysis cohorts 1 and 2 included 597 and 490 patients with available data for 1 year before and after the development of malignancies, respectively. Factors associated with the development of ML were longitudinally evaluated by multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 935 patients (mean age 70.5, standard deviation 9.9), 15.5% had ML; this was comparable to the rate of lung cancer (14.3%). In cohort 1, methotrexate (MTX), biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were used in 74.4%, 23.4%, and 56.7% of ML and in 56.8%, 25.4%, and 35.3% of other malignancies 1 year before the occurrence of malignancies. Clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and C-reactive protein were similar between the two groups. Multivariable analysis showed that MTX use (odds ratio [OR]: 2.22, 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.32-3.73, p=0.003) and NSAID use (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.58-3.98, p <0.001) were significantly associated with the development of ML versus other malignancies. However, this association was not observed with bDMARDs. In cohort 2, one year after the development of malignancies, MTX was used in none of ML and 41.8% of patients who developed other malignancies. In both malignancy groups, approximately 15% of patients received bDMARDs and 50% received glucocorticoids. IL-6 inhibitors were preferentially prescribed in patients with ML versus those with other malignancies. At year 1, CDAI remission was achieved in 37.3% and 31.1% of patients in the ML and other malignancy groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving long-term treatment with MTX and NSAIDs may be at a relatively high risk of developing ML. The treatment landscape after developing malignancies differed considerably between patients with ML and other malignancies, and different treatment strategies should be established.

Trends of disease activity in Japanese patients over 75 years with rheumatoid arthritis from 2014 to 2021- the ANSWER cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if disease activity among elderly RA patients over 75 years has changed over time in the real-world clinical setting. METHODS: Data from an observational multicentre registry of RA patients in Japan were analyzed. The primary outcome was to evaluate the changes in the proportion of very elderly RA patients (over 75 years) who achieved remission and low disease activity, from 2014 to 2021. The secondary outcome was to identify factors associated with remission and low disease activity by comparing demographic and clinical characteristics among the patients who had a study visit within the study period, using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 32 161 patient visits were identified from 2014 to 2021. The proportion of patients over 75 years increased from 16.5% to 26.9%, with biologics and targeted-synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) usage increasing and glucocorticoids usage decreasing, while conventional-synthetic DMARDs usage remained relatively stable. The proportion of RA patients over 75 years achieving remission and low disease activity significantly increased from 62.2% to 78.2% (p for trend < 0.001). A negative factor associated with achieving remission and low disease activity was glucocorticoid usage, seropositivity, and history of previous b/tsDMARDs use while MTX usage was associated positively, independent of other predictors. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, disease activity among very elderly RA patients has improved over time. The study suggests the importance of using a treat-to-target approach in very elderly RA patients to improve clinical outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis After Switching Between Interleukin-6-Receptor Inhibitors and Janus Kinase Inhibitors: Findings from an Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: This observational study evaluated response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who switched from an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri) to a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) and vice versa. METHODS: Adult patients with RA, who initiated IL-6Ri or JAKi (following discontinuation of JAKi or IL-6Ri, respectively) during/after December 2012 and had a 6-month follow-up visit were enrolled. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at baseline and the follow-up visit. Continuous outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), pain, fatigue, tender joint count, swollen joint count, Physician Global Assessment (MDGA), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), and morning stiffness duration. Categorical outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving CDAI low disease activity (LDA), remission, and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for HAQ, pain, fatigue, MDGA, and PtGA. Continuous outcomes were summarized as mean changes from baseline, and categorical outcomes as response rates. Differences in the outcome measures between groups were evaluated using linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Between IL-6Ri (n = 100) and JAKi initiators (n = 129), no significant differences were noted for continuous outcomes. Within both groups, a significant proportion of patients achieved LDA, remission, and MCIDs for other measures, although the odds of achieving LDA were higher among IL-6Ri (vs. JAKi) initiators with moderate-to-severe disease (adjusted odds ratio: 3.30 [1.01, 10.78]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA can achieve improvement in response when switching between IL-6Ri and JAKi. Although both therapies affect the IL-6 pathway, there are distinct mechanisms of action, which likely contribute to their clinical improvement, when reciprocally switched as follow-on treatments.

Methodology for the adolopment of recommendations for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there are no guidelines for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) tailored to the context of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Adaptation of guidelines accounts for contextual factors and becomes more efficient than de novo guideline development when relevant, good quality, and up-to-date guidelines are available. The objective of this study is to describe the methodology used for the adolopment of the 2021 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) guidelines for the treatment of RA in the KSA. METHODS: We followed the 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation' (GRADE)-ADOLOPMENT methodology. The adolopment KSA panel included relevant stakeholders and leading contributors to the original guidelines. We developed a list of five adaptation-relevant prioritization criteria that the panelists applied to the original recommendations. We updated the original evidence profiles with newly published studies identified by the panelists. We constructed Evidence to Decision (EtD) tables including contextual information from the KSA setting. We used the PanelVoice function of GRADEPro Guideline Development Tool (GDT) to obtain the panel's judgments on the EtD criteria ahead of the panel meeting. Following the meeting, we used the PANELVIEW instrument to obtain the panel's evaluation of the process. RESULTS: The KSA panel prioritized five recommendations, for which one evidence profile required updating. Out of five adoloped recommendations, two were modified in terms of direction, and one was modified in terms of certainty of the evidence. Criteria driving the modifications in direction were valuation of outcomes, balance of effects, cost, and acceptability. The mean score on the 7-point scale items of the PANELVIEW instrument had an average of 6.47 (SD = 0.18) across all items. CONCLUSION: The GRADE-ADOLOPMENT methodology proved to be efficient. The panel assessed the process and outcome positively. Engagement of stakeholders proved to be important for the success of this project.

Targeted Therapy in Rheumatoid-Arthritis-Related Interstitial Lung Disease.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune multisystem inflammatory disease in which lung involvement is the most common extra-articular manifestation. Parenchymal lung involvement or interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality and there is a paucity of evidence-based guidance on how to best treat RA-ILD. This review article aims to evaluate the evidence from cohort studies and best real word data from registries. Extensive discussion of the relative merits and drawbacks of glucocorticoids, various biologics, small molecules and anti-fibrotics is presented. The limited available guidelines in RA-ILD are also discussed and a rational treatment algorithm is offered.

A prospective observational cohort study of the efficacy of tofacitinib plus iguratimod on rheumatoid arthritis with usual interstitial pneumonia.

Objectives: This study aims to assess the efficacy of tofacitinib (TOF) plus iguratimod (IGU) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) (RA-UIP). Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort, single-center study. Data from 78 RA-UIP patients treated with TOF plus IGU, IGU plus conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), and csDMARDs were analyzed. Clinically relevant responses in RA activity assessment, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) assessment at baseline and follow-up were compared between groups to evaluate the efficacy of TOF plus IGU. Results: A total of 78 patients were followed up for at least 6 months after treatment. There were significant changes in sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein (CRP), and disease activity score (DAS) 28-CRP during the follow-up within each treatment group, but there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. After 6 months of TOF plus IGU treatment, forced vital capacity (FVC)% (84.7 ± 14.7 vs. 90.7 ± 15.4) and HRCT fibrosis score (7.3 ± 3.4 vs. 7.0 ± 5.6) showed a significant improvement compared to the csDMARDs group (P = 0.031, P = 0.015). The TOF plus IGU-treated patients had a significantly higher regression and lower deterioration than the csDMARDs-treated patients (P = 0.026, P = 0.026) and had a significantly higher response (regression + stability), with overall response rates of 66.7% (16/24) vs. 35.7% (10/28) (P = 0.027), respectively. Conclusion: Our results indicate that TOF plus IGU can simultaneously relieve RA and RA-UIP and be better than the csDMARDs with a higher response rate in RA-UIP, which may be a potential choice for "dual treat-to-target".

Utilizing biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic treatment sequences to subphenotype rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) require a trial of multiple biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) to control their disease. With the availability of several bDMARD options, the history of bDMARDs may provide an alternative approach to understanding subphenotypes of RA. The objective of this study was to determine whether there exist distinct clusters of RA patients based on bDMARD prescription history to subphenotype RA. METHODS: We studied patients from a validated electronic health record-based RA cohort with data from January 1, 2008, through July 31, 2019; all subjects prescribed ≥ 1 bDMARD or targeted synthetic (ts) DMARD were included. To determine whether subjects had similar b/tsDMARD sequences, the sequences were considered as a Markov chain over the state-space of 5 classes of b/tsDMARDs. The maximum likelihood estimator (MLE)-based approach was used to estimate the Markov chain parameters to determine the clusters. The EHR data of study subjects were further linked with a registry containing prospectively collected data for RA disease activity, i.e., clinical disease activity index (CDAI). As a proof of concept, we tested whether the clusters derived from b/tsDMARD sequences correlated with clinical measures, specifically differing trajectories of CDAI. RESULTS: We studied 2172 RA subjects, mean age 52 years, RA duration 3.4 years, and 62% seropositive. We observed 550 unique b/tsDMARD sequences and identified 4 main clusters: (1) TNFi persisters (65.7%), (2) TNFi and abatacept therapy (8.0%), (3) on rituximab or multiple b/tsDMARDs (12.7%), (4) prescribed multiple therapies with tocilizumab predominant (13.6%). Compared to the other groups, TNFi persisters had the most favorable trajectory of CDAI over time. CONCLUSION: We observed that RA subjects can be clustered based on the sequence of b/tsDMARD prescriptions over time and that the clusters were correlated with differing trajectories of disease activity over time. This study highlights an alternative approach to consider subphenotyping of patients with RA for studies aimed at understanding treatment response.

Response to treatment in psoriatic arthritis, the effect of age: analysis of patients receiving ustekinumab in the PsABio real-world study.

BACKGROUND: This post-hoc analysis of PsABio (NCT02627768) evaluated safety, effectiveness and treatment persistence in patients < 60 and ≥ 60 years of age receiving ustekinumab over 3 years. METHODS: Measures included adverse events (AE), clinical Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) low disease activity (LDA) including remission, Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-12 (PsAID-12), Minimal Disease Activity, dactylitis, nail/skin involvement and time to treatment stop. Data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS: Overall, 336 patients < 60 and 103 ≥ 60 years received ustekinumab, with a similar gender balance. A numerically lower proportion of younger patients reported at least one AE: 124/379 (32.7%) vs 47/115 (40.9%) for patients < 60 and ≥ 60 years, respectively. Serious AEs were low (< 10%) in both groups. At 6 months, the proportion of patients with cDAPSA LDA was 138/267 (51.7%) and 35/80 (43.8%) for patients < 60 and ≥ 60 years, respectively, with the effectiveness being maintained through 36 months. PsAID-12 mean scores reduced for both groups from a baseline mean of 5.73 and 5.61 for patients < 60 and ≥ 60 years, respectively, to 3.81 and 3.88, respectively, at 6 months, and 2.02 and 3.24, respectively, at 36 months. Regarding treatment persistence, 173/336 (51.5%) vs 47/103 (45.6%) patients < 60 and ≥ 60 years, respectively, stopped or switched treatment. CONCLUSION: Fewer AEs were observed over 3 years for younger versus older patients with PsA. There were no clinically meaningful treatment response differences. Persistence was numerically higher in the older age group.