Episiotomy practice in France and prevention of high-grade perineal tears at the time of operative vaginal delivery: a prospective multicentre ancillary cohort study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Evidence suggests that episiotomies reduce the risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) in operative vaginal deliveries (OVDs). However, there is limited evidence on the importance of episiotomy technique in this context. The primary objective of this study was to assess if an episiotomy suture angle >45° from the median line would be associated with a lower risk for OASIs at the time of OVD. METHODS: This was an ancillary study from the multicentre prospective cohort INSTRUMODA study. Of the 2,620 patients who had an OVD with a concomitant episiotomy between April 2021 and March 2022, a total of 219 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Post-suturing photographs were used to assess episiotomy characteristics. RESULTS: Based on suture angles of ≤45° and >45° the study cohort was categorized into groups A (n = 155) and B (n = 64) respectively. The groups had comparable demographic and birth-related characteristics. The mean episiotomy length was significantly longer in group A than in group B (3.21 cm vs 2.84 cm; p = 0.009). Senior obstetricians performed more acute angled episiotomies than junior residents (p = 0.016). The total prevalence of OASIS was 2.3%, with no significant difference in rate of OASI between the two study groups. Birthweight was significantly higher in OASI births (p = 0.018) and spatula-assisted births were associated with higher risk for OASIs than ventouse or forceps (p = 0.0039). CONCLUSIONS: This study did not demonstrate a significant reduction in risk for OASI at the time of OVD when the episiotomy suture angle was >45° from the median line. However, these results should be interpreted with caution owing to the low prevalence of OASIs in our cohort.

Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after implementing the Triepi-45 tool to improve episiotomy angle in instrumental deliveries.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of Triepi-45-a tool that enables an episiotomy angle of 45° to be marked on the perineum at rest-on the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) during operative vaginal delivery (OVD). METHOD: A retrospective-prospective cohort study was performed among successive women who underwent OVD at Complejo Asistencial Universitario de de León, Spain, between 2011 and 2013 (preintervention cohort, n=986) and between 2014 and 2016 (intervention cohort, n=986) after implementation of an interventional programme in 2013 to improve the episiotomy angle, including use of Triepi-45, in OVD. RESULTS: The intervention cohort had a lower incidence of OASIS than the preintervention cohort (70/986 [7.1%] vs 93/986 [9.4%]), but the difference was not significant, owing to the low use of Triepi-45 in the intervention cohort (n=375). However, the OASIS incidence was significantly lower in the Triepi-45 cohort than in the preintervention cohort (18/375 [4.8%] vs 93/986 [9.4%]; odds ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.86). CONCLUSION: Use of Triepi-45 had a positive impact on reducing OASIS in OVD. It remains essential to raise obstetricians' awareness of the importance of the episiotomy angle and to implement the systematic use of tools to reduce the incidence of OASIS.

Which characteristics of the episiotomy and perineum are associated with a lower risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in instrumental deliveries.

OBJETIVE: Operative vaginal delivery (OVD) is the most important risk fact for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). Knowledge of possible risk factors for their occurrence may therefore reduce the likelihood of faecal incontinence. The aim is to analyse the effect of mediolateral episitomy and perineum characteristics on the occurrence of OASI in OVD. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study, which included 958 OVD that were reviewed in Pelvic Floor and Puerperium Clinic. The episiotomy and perineum characteristics of those women who experienced OASIs (n = 150) were compared with those who had no evidence of anal sphincter injury (n = 788). RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression analysis the factors which were independently associated were nulliparity, persistent occipitoposterior position, birthweight >3500 g, an angle of episiotomy <30°, a distance episiotomy-fourchette <5 mm and a distance of perineal body <30 mm. The analysis of subgroups show that only the multiparous women does not benefit from any feature of the episiotomy, and an angle greater than 30° and a distance episiotomy-fourchette >5 mm are associated with a risk reduction of OASI in nulliparous, perineal bodies ≤30 mm and occipitoanterior position. CONCLUSIONS: Two modifiable risk factors at the time of performing the episiotomy, the angle and distance episiotomy-fourchette, have been identified as the risk modification of OASI. It is necessary to achieve an adequate angle to reduce the probability of OASIs in OVD, and in nulliparous women with an anterior position and a distance of perineal body ≤30 mm could benefit from increasing the episiotomy-fourchette distance.