Effect of beta-blockers and exercise restriction on the prevention of sudden cardiac death in pediatric hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Risk assessment tools and effective prevention strategies for sudden cardiac death (SCD) in pediatric patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have not been established. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of beta-blockers and exercise restriction for SCD prevention in this population. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients aged <18 years who were diagnosed with HCM at our center between January 1996 and December 2021. SCD and aborted SCD were defined as SCD equivalents. We divided patients based on whether they were prescribed beta-blockers or exercise restriction and compared the outcomes among the groups. The primary outcome was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was the cumulative SCD equivalent rate. Outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard analysis. We also compared patients according to the occurrence of SCD equivalents to identify SCD risk predictors. RESULTS: Among the 43 included patients [mean age, 7.7 (1.6-12.1) years; 23 male individuals], SCD equivalents occurred in 13 patients over 11.2 (4.5-15.6) years of follow-up, among whom 12 were resuscitated and 1 died. The OS rate was significantly higher in the beta-blocker and exercise restriction groups than in the non-beta-blocker and non-exercise restriction groups (81.3 % vs. 19.1 %, p < 0.01 and 57.4 % vs. 12.7 %, p < 0.01, respectively). Among the 13 patients with SCD equivalents, 5 had 9 recurrent SCD equivalents. A significant difference was observed between the SCD equivalent and non-SCD equivalent groups in the history of suspected arrhythmogenic syncope (p < 0.01) in the univariable but not in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Beta-blockers and exercise restriction may decrease the risk of SCD in pediatric patients with HCM and should be considered for SCD prevention in this population, particularly because predicting SCD in these patients remains challenging.

Living with Congenital Aortic Stenosis: Exercise Restriction, Patterns of Adherence, and Quality of Life.

Modern consensus panel guidelines recommend restriction from most organized sports for patients with moderate or severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, there is little published data on how frequently physicians deviate from guidelines, how well patients adhere to exercise restrictions, or the effect of restriction on patient-reported quality of life. In this study, we surveyed 93 subjects with AS and their cardiologists regarding participation in organized sports, physical activity, weightlifting, and exercise restriction. Subjects completed the pediatric quality of life inventory (PedsQL) and the pediatric cardiac quality of life inventory (PCQLI). We found that subjects with severe AS (n = 3) were commonly, but not universally, restricted from organized sports (n = 2, 66%). Subjects with moderate AS (n = 40) were rarely restricted from organized sports (n = 6, 17%). No physician-specific characteristics were associated with increased likelihood of recommending exercise restriction. Subjects were more likely to be restricted if they were older (16 years vs. 13 years, p 0.02) and had moderate versus mild AS (p 0.013). PCQLI scores for teens and young adults with AS (age 13-25) were lower than a comparison group of patients with mild congenital heart disease. For all age groups, the PedsQL social functioning score was lower for subjects with exercise restriction (p 0.052). In summary, cardiologists apply consensus guidelines leniently when restricting patients with moderate/severe AS from organized sports and weightlifting. Patients with AS routinely adhere to exercise restriction recommendations. Children and young adults with AS and exercise restriction have lower QOL scores in the social functioning domain.

2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: Executive summary.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an arrhythmogenic disorder of the myocardium not secondary to ischemic, hypertensive, or valvular heart disease. ACM incorporates a broad spectrum of genetic, systemic, infectious, and inflammatory disorders. This designation includes, but is not limited to, arrhythmogenic right/left ventricular cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Chagas disease, and left ventricular noncompaction. The ACM phenotype overlaps with other cardiomyopathies, particularly dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmia presentation that may be associated with ventricular dilatation and/or impaired systolic function. This expert consensus statement provides the clinician with guidance on evaluation and management of ACM and includes clinically relevant information on genetics and disease mechanisms. PICO questions were utilized to evaluate contemporary evidence and provide clinical guidance related to exercise in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Recommendations were developed and approved by an expert writing group, after a systematic literature search with evidence tables, and discussion of their own clinical experience, to present the current knowledge in the field. Each recommendation is presented using the Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence system formulated by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association and is accompanied by references and explanatory text to provide essential context. The ongoing recognition of the genetic basis of ACM provides the opportunity to examine the diverse triggers and potential common pathway for the development of disease and arrhythmia.

2019 HRS expert consensus statement on evaluation, risk stratification, and management of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is an arrhythmogenic disorder of the myocardium not secondary to ischemic, hypertensive, or valvular heart disease. ACM incorporates a broad spectrum of genetic, systemic, infectious, and inflammatory disorders. This designation includes, but is not limited to, arrhythmogenic right/left ventricular cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, Chagas disease, and left ventricular noncompaction. The ACM phenotype overlaps with other cardiomyopathies, particularly dilated cardiomyopathy with arrhythmia presentation that may be associated with ventricular dilatation and/or impaired systolic function. This expert consensus statement provides the clinician with guidance on evaluation and management of ACM and includes clinically relevant information on genetics and disease mechanisms. PICO questions were utilized to evaluate contemporary evidence and provide clinical guidance related to exercise in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Recommendations were developed and approved by an expert writing group, after a systematic literature search with evidence tables, and discussion of their own clinical experience, to present the current knowledge in the field. Each recommendation is presented using the Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence system formulated by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association and is accompanied by references and explanatory text to provide essential context. The ongoing recognition of the genetic basis of ACM provides the opportunity to examine the diverse triggers and potential common pathway for the development of disease and arrhythmia.

Evolving Decisions: Perspectives of Active and Athletic Individuals with Inherited Heart Disease Who Exercise Against Recommendations.

Individuals with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and long QT syndrome (LQTS) are advised to avoid certain forms of exercise to reduce their risk of sudden death. Cardiovascular genetic counselors facilitate both adaptation to, and decision-making about, these exercise recommendations. This study describes decision-making and experiences of active adults who exercise above physicians' recommendations. Purposive sampling was used to select adults with HCM and LQTS who self-identified as exercising above recommendations. Semi-structured interviews explored participants' decision-making and the psychological impact of exercise recommendations. Fifteen individuals were interviewed (HCM: 10; LQTS: 5; mean age: 40). Transcripts were coded and analyzed for underlying themes. Despite exercising above recommendations, nearly all participants made some modifications to their prior exercise regimen. Often these decisions changed over time, underscoring the importance of shared decision-making conversations beyond the initial evaluation. The importance of exercise was frequently cited as a reason for continued exercise, as were perceptions of sudden death risk as low, acceptable, or modifiable. Many participants reported that family and friends supported their exercise decisions, with a minority having family or friends that expressed significant reservations. Genetic counselors, cardiologists, and nurses can use these data to inform their counseling regarding exercise recommendations.

Outcomes of surgical intervention for anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery: A large contemporary prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze the outcomes of patients with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery undergoing surgical intervention according to a standardized management algorithm. METHODS: All patients aged 2 to 18 years undergoing surgical intervention for anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery between December 2012 and April 2017 were prospectively included. Patients underwent stress nuclear perfusion imaging, stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography angiography preoperatively. Patients were cleared for exercise at 3 months postoperatively if asymptomatic and repeat stress nuclear perfusion imaging, stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography angiography showed normal results. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients, with a median age of 14 years (8-18 years), underwent surgical intervention: 9 (20%) for the anomalous left coronary artery and 35 (80%) for the anomalous right coronary artery. Surgical procedures included unroofing in 35 patients (80%), translocation in 7 patients (16%), ostioplasty in 1 patient (2%), and side-side-anastomosis in 1 patient (2%). One patient who presented with aborted sudden cardiac death from an anomalous left coronary and underwent unroofing presented 1 year later with a recurrent episode and was found to have an unrecognized myocardial bridge and persistent compression of the coronary requiring reintervention. At last follow-up, 40 patients (91%) are asymptomatic and 4 patients have nonspecific chest pain; 42 patients (95%) have returned to full activity, and 2 patients are awaiting clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment for anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery is safe and should aim to associate the coronary ostium with the correct sinus, away from the intercoronary pillar. After surgery, the majority of patients are cleared for exercise and remain asymptomatic. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the true efficacy of surgery in the prevention of sudden cardiac death.

Exercise restriction is not associated with increasing body mass index over time in patients with anomalous aortic origin of the coronary arteries.

Anomalous aortic origin of the coronary arteries is associated with exercise-induced ischaemia, leading some physicians to restrict exercise in patients with this condition. We sought to determine whether exercise restriction was associated with increasing body mass index over time. From 1998 to 2015, 440 patients ⩽30 years old were enrolled into an inception cohort. Exercise-restriction status was documented in 143 patients. Using linear mixed model repeated-measures regression, factors associated with increasing body mass index z-score over time, including exercise restriction and surgical intervention as time-varying covariates, were investigated. The 143 patients attended 558 clinic visits for which exercise-restriction status was recorded. The mean number of clinic visits per patient was 4, and the median duration of follow-up was 1.7 years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.5-4.4). The median age at first clinic visit was 10.3 years (IQR 7.1-13.9), and 71% (101/143) were males. All patients were alive at their most recent follow-up. At the first clinic visit, 54% (78/143) were exercise restricted, and restriction status changed in 34% (48/143) during follow-up. The median baseline body mass index z-score was 0.2 (IQR 0.3-0.9). In repeated-measures analysis, neither time-related exercise restriction nor its interaction with time was associated with increasing body mass index z-score. Surgical intervention and its interaction with time were associated with decreasing body mass index z-score. Although exercise restriction was not associated with increasing body mass index over time, surgical intervention was associated with decreasing body mass index z-score over time in patients with anomalous aortic origin of the coronary arteries.

Decision analysis to define the optimal management of athletes with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to use decision analysis to evaluate the impact of varying uncertainties on the outcomes of patients with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery. METHODS: Two separate decision analysis models were created: one for anomalous left coronary artery (ALCA) and one for anomalous right coronary artery (ARCA). Three strategies were compared: observation, exercise restriction, and surgery. Probabilities and health utilities were estimated on the basis of existing literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Surgery was the optimal management strategy for patients <30 years of age with ALCA. As age increased, observation became an equivalent strategy and eventually surpassed surgery as the treatment of choice. The advantage on life expectancy for surgery over observation ranged from 2.6 ± 1.7 years for a 10-year-old patient to -0.03 ± 0.1 for a 65-year old patient. In patients with ARCA, observation was the optimal strategy for most patients with a life expectancy advantage over surgery of 0.1 ± 0.1 years to 0.2 ± 0.4 years, depending on age. Surgery was the preferred strategy only for patients <25 years of age when the perceived risk of sudden cardiac death was high and the perioperative mortality was low. Exercise restriction was a suboptimal strategy for both ALCA and ARCA in all scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal management in anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery depends on multiple factors, including individual patient characteristics. Decision analysis provides a tool to understand how these characteristics affect the outcomes with each management strategy and thus may aid in the decision making process for a particular patient.

Exercise-induced cardiopulmonary arrest in a child with aortic stenosis.

The beneficial effect of exercise restriction in preventing sudden cardiac death in children with aortic stenosis remains unclear. We report the case of a 15-year-old boy with congenital aortic stenosis who was resuscitated after sudden cardiac arrest during exercise. The case led to the new concept that exercise restriction may prevent not only unpredictable ventricular ischaemic events and associated arrhythmias but also progressive ventricular hypertrophy.

Should women with incontinence and prolapse do abdominal curls?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urinary incontinence (UI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) occur in 30-50 % of women. It is proposed that increases in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) caused by high-intensity activities may contribute to symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunction. There is a lack of consensus as to the type of activity restrictions that may be necessary in this population. The objective was to determine the change in IAP (cm H20) during abdominal curl and cough in patients with UI and POP attending urodynamic evaluation. METHODS: In this exploratory descriptive study, 30 women with diagnosed POP and/or UI were recruited. IAP was measured by multichannel cystometry whilst participants performed three abdominal curls and three maximal coughs. RESULTS: Participants were aged 29-80 (mean 56.2) years, and mean ± standard deviation (SD) body mass index (BMI) was 29.9 (5.2) kg/m(-2). All participants had UI and 12 had POP in addition to UI. IAP increased significantly from rest to abdominal curl and cough (19.6-50.3 and 78.4, respectively; p < 0.001). Greater pressures were generated in the women with POP than in those with UI only (p = 0.02). There were large variations in change in pressure between participants (1.67-159.66 for cough; 4-81.67 for abdominal curl). CONCLUSION: The large variability in IAP generated during abdominal curl and cough suggests some current recommendations may be unnecessarily restrictive in some women but important in others. Advice for women with pelvic floor dysfunction undertaking tasks that increase IAP needs to be individualized.

Exercise and ß-blocker therapy recommendations for inherited arrhythmogenic conditions.

BACKGROUND: Management of individuals with long QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy may involve exercise restriction and/or ß-blocker therapy. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the practices of a group of paediatric electrophysiologists regarding the management of genotype-positive/phenotype-positive and genotype-positive/phenotype-negative individuals with these conditions. METHOD: An online survey was circulated to members of the Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society in May, 2014. The survey included questions addressing the respondents' approach regarding exercise recommendations and prescription of ß-blocker therapy. RESULTS: A total of 45 cardiologists completed the survey. The majority of respondents restricted symptomatic patients from competitive sports; however, only approximately half restricted phenotype-negative mutation carriers from this level of activity. Recommendations were less consistent regarding other types of activities. A trend was identified regarding physician physical activity and exercise recommendations for phenotype-negative mutation carriers. Less-active physicians were more likely to restrict exercise. ß-blocker therapy was discussed by the majority of respondents for symptomatic patients and a significant number of asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION: Exercise restriction for patients with long QT syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy varies based on several factors including phenotype, type of exercise, guidelines referred to, and physicians' own level of activity.