Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Asian Nat Prod Res ; 26(1): 154-176, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38321773

RESUMEN

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common, malignant, and lethal primary brain tumor in adults. Up to now, the chemotherapy approaches for GBM are limited. Therefore, more studies on identifying and exploring new chemotherapy drugs or strategies overcome the GBM are essential. Natural products are an important source of drugs against various human diseases including cancers. With the better understanding of the molecular etiology of GBM, the development of new anti-GBM drugs has been increasing. Here, we summarized recent researches of natural products for the GBM therapy and their potential mechanisms in details, which will provide new ideas for the research on natural products and promote developing drugs from nature products for GBM therapy.


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioblastoma , Humanos , Glioblastoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Glioblastoma/patología , Productos Biológicos/farmacología , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología
2.
Clin Proteomics ; 20(1): 41, 2023 Sep 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37770851

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Meningiomas are the most prevalent primary brain tumors. Due to their increasing burden on healthcare, meningiomas have become a pivot of translational research globally. Despite many studies in the field of discovery proteomics, the identification of grade-specific markers for meningioma is still a paradox and requires thorough investigation. The potential of the reported markers in different studies needs further verification in large and independent sample cohorts to identify the best set of markers with a better clinical perspective. METHODS: A total of 53 fresh frozen tumor tissue and 51 serum samples were acquired from meningioma patients respectively along with healthy controls, to validate the prospect of reported differentially expressed proteins and claimed markers of Meningioma mined from numerous manuscripts and knowledgebases. A small subset of Glioma/Glioblastoma samples were also included to investigate inter-tumor segregation. Furthermore, a simple Machine Learning (ML) based analysis was performed to evaluate the classification accuracy of the list of proteins. RESULTS: A list of 15 proteins from tissue and 12 proteins from serum were found to be the best segregator using a feature selection-based machine learning strategy with an accuracy of around 80% in predicting low grade (WHO grade I) and high grade (WHO grade II and WHO grade III) meningiomas. In addition, the discriminant analysis could also unveil the complexity of meningioma grading from a segregation pattern, which leads to the understanding of transition phases between the grades. CONCLUSIONS: The identified list of validated markers could play an instrumental role in the classification of meningioma as well as provide novel clinical perspectives in regard to prognosis and therapeutic targets.

3.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 33(4): 621-630, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28008781

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study addressed the benefit of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) compared with conventional neuronavigation-guided resection in patients with gliomas. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched up to 26 September 2015. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two-arm prospective studies, and retrospective studies in patients with glioblastoma/glioma who had received surgical treatment were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were the extent of tumor resection and tumor size reduction for using iMRI-guided or conventional neuronavigation-guided neurosurgery. Secondary outcomes included impact of surgery on 6 month progression-free survival (PFS), 12 month overall survival (OS) rates and surgical duration. RESULTS: We found that iMRI was associated with greater rate of gross total resection (rGTR) compared with conventional neuronavigation procedures (3.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07-4.83, P < .001). We found no difference between the two neuronavigation approaches in extent of resection (EOR), tumor size reduction, or time required for surgery (P values ≥.065). Intraoperative MRI was associated with a higher rate of progression-free survival (PFS) compared with conventional neuronavigation (odds ratio, 1.84; 95% CI 1.15-2.95; P = .012), but the rate of overall survival (OS) between groups was similar (P = .799). Limitations of the study included the fact that data from non-RCTs was used, the small study population, and heterogeneity of outcomes across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that iMRI more frequently resulted in more complete resections leading to improved PFS in patients with malignant gliomas.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Glioma , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Femenino , Glioma/mortalidad , Glioma/cirugía , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/mortalidad , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/mortalidad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/mortalidad , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA