Loose Intraperitoneal Spiral Tack Causing Small Bowel Obstruction Following Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair of Ventral Incisional Hernia: A Case Report.

This case report discusses a rare complication of small bowel obstruction occurring in the early course following Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) repair for an incisional hernia. The bowel obstruction, which failed to respond to conservative measures, was caused by band adhesions resulting from the presence of a loose intraperitoneal migrated surgical tack. This was successfully managed laparoscopically resulting in complete recovery. We present the clinical and radiological findings and review the relevant literature in this area.

TACKoMesh - A randomised controlled trial comparing absorbable versus non-absorbable tack fixation in laparoscopic IPOM + repair of primary incisional hernia using post-operative pain and quality of life - Reliatack™ versus Protack™.

There is a clinical need to better understand and improve post-operative pain for patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia. The aim of this single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was to compare post-operative pain between absorbable and non-absorbable tack fixation in patients undergoing IPOM + repair. Patients with primary incisional hernia (size 3-10 cm), were randomised to either Reliatack™ (n = 27), an articulating-arm device deploying absorbable polymer tacks, or Protack™ (n = 36), a straight-arm device deploying permanent titanium tacks. The primary outcome was reported pain on activity using a visual analogue scale at post-operative day 30. Clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed pre-operatively (day 0), and at 1-, 6-, 30- and 365-days post-surgery. No significant differences in reported pain 'on activity' were found at any timepoint. Less reported pain 'at rest' was found on post-operative day-1 with absorbable tacks (p = 0.020). Significantly longer mesh-fixation time (p < 0.001) and the use of more knots for fascial closure (p = 0.006) and tacks for mesh-fixation (p = 0.001) were found for the absorbable tack group. There were no differences in other clinical and PROMs between groups. For the whole trial cohort (n = 63) several domains in the Short-Form-36 showed a reduction from baseline scores at day 30 that improved at day 365. At post-operative day 30, 75.0% of patients reported 'a lot of pain' since discharge. This study found no difference in reported pain when choosing absorbable or non-absorbable tack fixation. The utility of "early" post-operative pain assessment as a comparator following incisional hernia repair needs clarification.

Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) in the Treatment of Ventral Hernias: Technique Discussion Points.

Incisional ventral hernias (IVH) are a common occurrence worldwide. The resolve is fundamentally surgical. In this regard, laparoscopic treatment has become the standard. This paper aims to review intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) as a surgical solution for IVH and to explore the limitations and advantages in relation to the technique of mesh fixation, defect suture, seroma formation, and recurrence in accordance with the data published. The article is structured as a narrative review and relies on the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) convention. In the analysis, we included articles published in the literature regarding the surgical treatment of ventral hernias (umbilical and incisional) through the IPOM technique. We explored data regarding the mesh fixation technique on the anterior abdominal wall (tacks or sutures), indications and limitations of defect closure, incidence of seroma formation, and recurrence rate. Laparoscopic IPOM is a better option for IVH up to 10 cm than the open technique with regard to aesthetics, length of hospital stay, and postoperative pain. There is no difference in recurrence rates. Suturing of the defect should be done to decrease seroma formation and maintain the functionality of the abdominal wall. Ideally, the suture should be done intraperitoneally or laparoscopically. Regarding pain in mesh fixation, there seems to be an increase in the short-term postoperative pain in the suture groups, but at six months, when compared to the tacks groups, there is no difference. New methods are being developed that include different types of glue but require large prospective, randomized trials if they are to be included in the guidelines.

Ventral hernia repair in India: a Delphi consensus.

PURPOSE: While research on inguinal hernias is well-documented, ventral/incisional hernias still require investigation. In India, opinions on laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) techniques are contested. The current consensus aims to standardize LVHR practice and identify gaps and unfulfilled demands that compromise patient safety and therapeutic outcomes. METHODS: Using the modified Delphi technique, panel of 14 experts (general surgeons) came to a consensus. Two rounds of consensus were conducted online. An advisory board meeting was held for the third round, wherein survey results were discussed and the final statements were decided with supporting clinical evidence. RESULTS: Experts recommended intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus/trans-abdominal retromuscular/extended totally extraperitoneal/mini- or less-open sublay operation/transabdominal preperitoneal/trans-abdominal partial extra-peritoneal/subcutaneous onlay laparoscopic approach/laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty as valid minimal access surgery (MAS) options for ventral hernia (VH). Intraperitoneal repair technique is the preferred MAS procedure for primary umbilical hernia < 4 cm without diastasis; incisional hernia in the presence of a vertical single midline incision; symptomatic hernia, BMI > 40 kg/m2, and defect up to 4 cm; and for MAS VH surgery with grade 3/4 American Society of Anaesthesiologists. IPOM plus is the preferred MAS procedure for midline incisional hernia of width < 4 cm in patients with a previous laparotomy. Extraperitoneal repair technique is the preferred MAS procedure for L3 hernia < 4 cm; midline hernias < 4 cm with diastasis; and M5 hernia. CONCLUSION: The consensus statements will help standardize LVHR practices, improve decision-making, and provide guidance on MAS in VHR in the Indian scenario.

[The results of clinical application of the mesh with anti-adhesive fluoropolymer coating in laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of primary ventral hernia]. / Rezul'taty klinicheskogo primeneniya setchatogo endoproteza s antiadgezivnym ftorpolimernym pokrytiem pri laparoskopicheskoi intraperitoneal'noi plastike pervichnykh ventral'nykh gryzh.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results of using fluoropolymer-coated mesh during intraperitoneal onlay mesh hernia repair in patients with primary ventral hernias. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The multicenter, non-randomized, controlled clinical study included 88 patients of both sexes who were operated on using a laparoscopic approach using the IPOM technique for a primary ventral hernia. The duration of observation ranged from 3 to 12 months. In the main group, 48 patients received fluoropolymer-coated meshes (Ftorex). A comparison was made with a retrospective group of 40 patients who were treated with anti-adhesive collagen-coated meshes (Parietene composite, Parietex Composite, Symbotex). RESULTS: The number of early and late postoperative complications in the groups did not have significant differences, at the same time, their number was lower in the group of patients in whom fluoropolymer-coated meshes were used. Most of the complications corresponded to Clavien-Dindo class I and II and did not pose a significant threat to health. There were no recurrences of hernias observed in patients included in the study. There were slightly more adhesions in the fluoropolymer-coated mesh group (35.4% vs. 25.0% in the collagen-coated mesh group). The quality of life of patients in the study groups did not differ. CONCLUSION: In laparoscopic IPOM hernia repair fluoropolymer-coated meshes are not inferior in effectiveness and safety to traditionally used collagen-coated meshes and can be recommended for use in patients with primary ventral hernias.

Open intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair with anterior component separation as a bail-out procedure in the management of complex hernias.

PURPOSE: Surgical repair of complex abdominal wall hernias remains technically demanding and is widely recognized as a risk factor for unfavorable outcomes with high recurrence and morbidity rates. The objective is to assess short- and long-term complications after open intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair combined with bilateral anterior component separation (ACS) for large and difficult incisional hernias, alongside evaluating hernia recurrence rates. METHODS: This retrospective analysis utilized data sourced from Hospital electronic health records and a prospective database at an academic tertiary referral center. Data collection was carried out from patients operated between January 2006 and December 2017. Eligible patients had complex incisional hernias measuring at least 10 cm in their transverse diameter and had an open IPOM repair with bilateral ACS. RESULTS: In our study group of 45 patients, the 30-day surgical site occurrence (SSO) rate was high (37.8%), primarily consisting of superficial postoperative complications as seroma (17.8%) and wound dehiscence (6.7%). Among six patients (13.3%), wound complications escalated to chronic infected mesh-related problems, leading to complete mesh removal in four cases (8.9%) and partial mesh removal in two cases (4.4%). Regarding long-term complications, five patients (11.1%) developed enterocutaneous fistula. The recurrence rate was modest [5 out of 41 (12.2%)] over a median follow-up period of 99 months. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high SSO rate, application of the open IPOM technique with ACS could serve as a valuable rescue option for managing large and complex hernias, with acceptable hernia recurrence rates at long-term follow-up.

Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) Repair Versus Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) Repair in Primary Ventral Hernias: Experience With 50 Cases in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background Primary ventral hernias are abnormal protrusions of abdominal viscera through the areas of weakness in the fascia of the abdominal wall. The aim of this study was to compare the benefits and complications, and the overall outcome in the Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) repair versus Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM Plus) repair in the management of primary ventral hernias. Methods After obtaining institutional ethical committee clearance, this prospective comparative study between IPOM Plus and eTEP-RS was conducted in a tertiary care hospital from December 2020 to January 2022. A total of 50 patients presenting with primary ventral hernias were included in the study, of whom 25 underwent IPOM Plus and 25 underwent eTEP-RS repairs. Group selection was done by simple randomization using the lottery method. Patients more than 18 years of age with primary ventral hernias presenting with a hernial defect width less than 6 cm, consenting to the study, were included in the study. Patients who did not fulfill the inclusion criteria, strangulated/obstructed hernias, recurrent/incisional hernias, connective tissue disorders, skin infections, enterocutaneous fistulas, pregnancy, morbid obesity, and parastomal hernias were exclusion factors. Results The mean intraoperative duration in the eTEP-RS group (192.3 ± 16.20 min) was significantly higher than in the IPOM Plus group (102.6 ± 16.78min, p=0.001). The mean duration of hospital stay in the IPOM Plus group (5.9 ± 2.19 days) was longer than in the eTEP-RS group (4.6 ± 3.17 days, p=0.02). The mean postoperative pain scores, from the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), on days 1, 7, and 90 were 3.2 ± 1.11, 2.64 ± 1.11, and 1.68 ± 1.46 in the IPOM Plus group and 1.84 ± 0.688, 0.76 ± 0.66 and 0.08 ± 0.40 in the eTEP-RS group, respectively (p=0.001). Conclusion Despite being a technically easy procedure requiring less intraoperative time, IPOM Plus had several disadvantages, such as increased postoperative pain, longer duration of hospital stays, higher chances of wound site seromas, and higher rates of postoperative paralytic ileus. On the other hand, eTEP-RS was a more challenging procedure requiring more intraoperative time; however, it had several advantages: less postoperative pain, less duration of hospital stay, early recovery, and fewer chances of seromas and paralytic ileus. However, more robust data is required to compare and validate the differences between both procedures' short- and long-term outcomes.

Laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique versus intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM plus) for ventral hernia repair: a comparative analysis.

PURPOSE: Primary aim of this study is to compare the postoperative outcomes of the laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) technique to the intraperitoneal onlay mesh closing the defect (IPOM plus), in terms of recurrence and bulging rates at one-year follow-up; secondary aim is to compare the postoperative complications, seroma and pain at 30 days and one-year after surgery. METHODS: Patients with midline ventral hernia of 4-10 cm in width were included. Computed tomography scan was performed before, 1 and 12 months after surgery. Pain was evaluated using the visual analogue scale. RESULTS: Forty-five and forty-seven consecutive patients underwent LIRA and IPOM plus, respectively. Preoperatively, smoke habits and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease rates were statistically significantly higher in the LIRA group (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.012, respectively). Two bulgings (4.4%) occurred in the LIRA group, while in the IPOM plus group occurred 10 bulgings (21.3%) and three recurrences (6.4%) (p = 0.017 and p = 0.085, respectively). Postoperatively, seven (15.6%, Clavien-Dindo I) and four complications (8.5%, two Clavien-Dindo I, two Clavien-Dindo III-b) occurred in the LIRA and in the IPOM plus group, respectively (p = 0.298). One month after surgery, clinical seroma, occurred in five (11.1%) and eight patients (17%) in the LIRA and in the IPOM plus group, respectively (p = 0.416). During follow-up, pain reduction occurred, without statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, even if we analysed a small series, LIRA showed lower bulging and recurrence rates in comparison to IPOM plus at one-year follow-up. Further prospective studies, with a large sample of patients and longer follow-up are required to draw definitive conclusions.

[Incisional hernias: minimally invasive surgical procedures]. / Narbenhernien: minimalinvasive Operationsverfahren.

BACKGROUND: In recent years many new surgical techniques for minimally invasive treatment of ventral hernias have been developed and introduced. This review article presents these new minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair, mini or less open sublay (MILOS), endoscopic-assisted linea alba reconstruction (ELAR), the ventral transabdominal preperitoneal patch (TAPP) technique, intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus and laparoscopic intracorporeal rectus aponeuroplasty (LIRA) and discusses recently published results. RESULTS: Modern minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of ventral hernias have the potential to reduce surgical site infections, lower postoperative pain and lead to a shorter duration of hospital stay compared to the classical open hernia repair; however, especially techniques with a retromuscular mesh position are technically challenging due to the preparation in a limited space and difficult to perform endoscopic sutures and necessitate detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the abdominal wall. The treatment of larger hernias in particular should therefore only be carried out under the prerequisite of extensive experience and case numbers. CONCLUSION: The new endoscopic and endoscopically assisted techniques for treatment of ventral hernias enable the experienced laparoscopic surgeon to primarily and secondarily treat ventral hernias with minimally invasive techniques.

A novel auxiliary fixation technique of meshes in intraperitoneal onlay mesh procedures for incisional hernia repair.

Introduction: Mesh fixation is an important step in incisional hernia repair. Weak fixation possibly results in postoperative pain, and even hernia recurrence. We innovated an auxiliary fixation approach, the magnet attraction technique (MAT), to achieve better mesh fixation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of MAT in intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) procedures for incisional hernia repair. Methods: Historical patient records were analyzed according to the clinical data of 16 patients with incisional hernias. Among them, 5 patients have undergone IPOM repair procedures in combination with MAT to assist in mesh fixation. As a control, 11 patients treated with IPOM and mesh fixation via conventional suspension were included. The clinical data collected include patients' basic characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative conditions, and follow-up results in both groups. Results: Compared with patients in the control group, patients in the MAT group were found to suffer from a larger hernia ring diameter and longer surgical duration, but shorter hospitalization length on average. And most importantly, no complication has been reported in the MAT group. Conclusion: MAT in IPOM operation was regarded as a feasible and safe technique for patients suffering from incisional hernias.

A randomised control trial study of early post-operative pain and intraoperative surgeon workload following laparoscopic mesh repair of midline ventral hernia by enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus approach.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the peri-operative outcomes, especially intraoperative surgeon workload and early post-operative pain, following midline ventral hernia repair by laparoscopic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus (IPOM plus) approach. Patients and Methods: This single-centre randomised control trial study was conducted from January 2020 to June 2022. A total of 60 adult patients undergoing elective ventral hernia surgery with small- and medium-sized midline defects were included. Intraoperative surgeon workload and early post-operative pain were systematically recorded and analysed for each procedure. Results: Out of 30 patients assigned to each group, 29 patients underwent eTEP mesh repair and 27 patients underwent successful IPOM plus repair. The intraoperative surgeon's workload, especially mental demand, physical demand, task complexity and degree of difficulty as reported and felt by the operating surgeon, was significantly higher in the eTEP mesh repair group compared to IPOM plus group (P < 0.001) with comparable operating room distractions (P = 0.039). The mean overall post-operative pain score on post-operative day 1 was slightly less in eTEP mesh repair (4.28 ± 1.12) group compared to IPOM plus group (4.93 ± 1.17), which was statistically insignificant (P = 0.042). The eTEP group had significantly longer operative time and length of hospital stay compared to the IPOM plus group. Conclusion: Our study revealed significantly longer operative time, higher surgical workload and increased length of hospital stay in the eTEP group with comparable early post-operative pain in both groups, thus making eTEP mesh repair a more difficult and challenging procedure.

[Histological changes in intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) with synthetic and biological meshes. Results of the chronic experiment]. / Gistologicheskie izmeneniya pri intraperitoneal'noi plastike (IPOM) sinteticheskimi i biologicheskimi endoprotezami. Rezul'taty khronicheskogo eksperimenta.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to analyze histological changes in the site of the meshes FTOREX, FTOREX coated with carboxymethylcellulose, Ventralight ST, Symbotex, REPEREN-16-2 and decellularized porcine peritoneum on the parietal peritoneum of the pig. MATERIAL AND METHODS: At laparoscopy, 6 different meshes were placed intraperitoneally in each of the 3 pigs. After 90 days, the animals were taken out of the experiment. After staining with hematoxylin and eosin, quantitative morphometry and counting the number of vessels and cells in the interstitium in the areas of the mesh and peritoneum were performed. An immunohistochemical study with an antibody to pancytokeratins assessed the state of the initial peritoneum and neoperitoneum. RESULTS: According to morphological characteristics, the meshes were divided into 3 groups: 1) with fluoropolymer coating FTOREX, 2) Ventralight ST and Symbotex, 3) REPEREN and decellularized peritoneum. In group 1, the surface area of the mesh threads was optimal in terms of the arrangement and arrangement of the threads relative to each other. This contributed to the formation of a relatively dense fibrous framework and a place to preserve the underlying peritoneum involved in the formation of the neoperitoneum. Despite the smallest surface area of the threads, in group 3, the greatest fibroblastic reaction was noted. Inflammatory changes were the least pronounced in group 1. They were the greatest in group 3, where there was a pronounced leukocyte reaction, combined with the processes of metaplasia, the development of fibrinoid necrosis, and the progression of the secondary inflammatory process. In group 1, the optimal ratio of newly formed vessels was noted, in group 2 - veins prevailed over arteries, in group 3 - the number of vessels was minimal. Immunohistochemical study showed that in group 1, mesothelial cells covered almost the entire surface of the implant, and there were also areas of preserved basic peritoneum. In group 2, mesothelium also covered most of the surface of the meshes, but the underlying peritoneum was absent. In group 3, on the contrary, a significant number of extended areas not covered with mesothelium were revealed. CONCLUSION: The conducted morphological and morphometric study showed that the most balanced ratio of the components of the newly formed fibrous tissue and blood vessels is observed when using implants with a fluoropolymer coating FTOREX. At the same time, the remaining basic peritoneum actively participated in the formation of the neoperitoneum. The Ventralight ST and Symbotex meshes also contributed to the formation of a full-fledged fibrous tissue and adequate vascular proliferation, however, they prevented the preservation of the underlying peritoneum, which practically excluded its participation in the formation of the neoperitoneum. The REPEREN mesh and decellularized porcine peritoneum led to the least balanced cell and vascular proliferation and the greatest fibroplastic reaction, which could further negatively affect the state of the formed scar.

A rare case of multiple port site incisional hernias repaired by laparoscopy-assisted intraperitoneal onlay mesh: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Port site herniation is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery, yet treatment strategies for multiple port site hernias are often difficult and case reports are rare. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 72-year-old woman, with a history of multiple abdominal surgeries, underwent laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse four years prior. Three 12 mm ports were inserted into the umbilical region, right upper quadrant and right lower abdomen, subsequently, incisional hernias developed at all three sites. In addition, an incisional hernia developed in the lower abdomen, for a total of four incisional hernias. She was taking apixaban for atrial fibrillation, and since the standard surgical method of placing the mesh in the extraperitoneal space was judged to be high risk for postoperative bleeding and hematoma formation, we performed a laparoscopy-assisted intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM). DISCUSSION: The key points of the surgery performed are: Laparoscopic surgery was initiated with a small incision in the umbilical region, using two 5 mm ports because we reasoned that using a 12 mm port could cause a new hernia. In the lateral hernia repair, a mesh was placed in the preperitoneal space on the dorsal side of the hernia, the mesh was sutured to the peritoneum because tucking cannot be performed if nerves are present on the dorsal aspect. The medial hernia was repaired by IPOM via a small laparotomy incision. CONCLUSION: For multiple incisional hernias, it is necessary to consider appropriate repair methods for each site.

Robotic Ventral Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Uncomplicated Spigelian Hernia.

Spigelian hernias are rare herniations through the Spigelian fascia, with an incidence rate of 0.12-2.0% of all hernias. Diagnosis may be difficult due to a potential lack of symptoms until complications arise. Therefore, imaging with either ultrasound or CT with oral contrast is recommended to confirm the diagnosis if a Spigelian hernia is suspected. Once the diagnosis has been established, it is essential that operative repair be performed as soon as possible because 24% of Spigelian hernias become incarcerated, and 27% of Spigelian hernias lead to strangulation. Management options include open surgery, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic surgery. This case report discusses the management of a 47-year-old man with an uncomplicated Spigelian hernia that was repaired with the robotic ventral transabdominal preperitoneal repair technique.

Comparison of outcomes of the extended-view totally extraperitoneal rives-stoppa (eTEP-RS) and the intraperitoneal onlay mesh with defect closure (IPOM-plus) for W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair-a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The eTEP technique is a new approach that has recently gained popularity in abdominal wall hernia surgery. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the eTEP-RS and IPOM-plus procedures in W1 and W2 midline incisional abdominal wall hernia (IAWH) repairs performed by the same surgeon. METHODS: Prospectively collected data of laparoscopic abdominal wall repairs performed on 61 patients with eTEP between November 2018 and April 2022 and on 67 patients with IPOM-plus between January 2016 and April 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 74 out of 128 patients, 30 in the eTEP-RS group and 44 in the IPOM-plus group, who underwent W1-W2 midline incisional hernia repair were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 24 months in the eTEP-RS group and 45 months in the IPOM-plus group. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, sex, BMI, ASA score, or active smoking. No difference was seen between the two groups in terms of the mean defect area (MDA, 28.17 cm2 vs. 27.41 cm2, p = 0.84), but the mean mesh area (MMA) and mesh/defect (M/D) ratio were higher in the eTEP-RS group (404.11 cm2 vs. 267.85 cm2, p < 0.001 and 20.96 vs. 12.36, p = 0.004). In the eTEP-RS group, the hospital length of stay (LOS) (1.48 days vs. 2.58 days, p < 0.001) and pain on the first and 10th postoperative days were significantly lower (p < 0.001), while the operative time was significantly longer (204.07 min vs. 88.33 min, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of intraoperative complications (p = 0.56), seroma formation (p = 0.83), or recurrence (p = 0.83). CONCLUSION: The eTEP-RS technique has advantages over the IPOM-plus approach, such as a shorter LOS and less early postoperative pain with W1-W2 midline IAWH repair. However, the eTEP technique has a longer operative time.

[Safety of mesh with fluoropolymer coating during intra-abdominal placement in large animals: results of the pilot study]. / Bezopasnost' setchatykh endoprotezov s ftorpolimernym pokrytiem: rezul'taty pilotnogo issledovaniya.

OBJECTIVE: When performing laparoscopic intraperitoneal hernioplasty (IPOM), endoprostheses made of fluoropolymers are often used. However, there is no data in the literature on the intra-abdominal use of inexpensive polyester prostheses with a fluoropolymer coating compared to composite implants. Thus, the aim of the pilot study was a preliminary assessment of the safety profile of FTOREX mesh endoprostheses during intra-abdominal placement in large animals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 6 endoprostheses were installed laparoscopically intraperitoneally in each of the 3 pigs: 1) FTOREX; 2) FTOREX with a layer of carboxymethylcellulose; 3) REPEREN-16-2; 4) SYMBOTEX; 5) VENTRALIGHT ST; 6) decellularized pork peritoneum. Fixation was performed with a herniator, transfascial sutures were not used. Relaparoscopy was performed after 45 days, and withdrawal from the experiment was performed after 90 days. Performance characteristics, signs of deformation and retraction, parameters of spike formation were evaluated. RESULTS: All the animals survived, no complications were observed. There were no clinical manifestations or behavioral reactions indicating the presence of adhesions. The most convenient to use were the SYMBOTEX and FTOREX implants (5.0 points each). By the end of the experiment, deformation and retraction were noted in both variants of the FTOREX implants and the REPEREN prosthesis. These changes were completely absent only when using the SYMBOTEX endoprosthesis. According to the number of implants with adhesions, by the end of the observation, both variants of FTOREX prostheses occupied an intermediate position between the Reference (the worst indicator) and VENTRALIGHT ST (the best indicator). However, both FTOREX endoprostheses showed the best performance among all implants in the integral assessment of adhesions, as well as in terms of parameters such as the area and appearance of adhesions, and in terms of the strength of the joints, they were second only to the VENTRALIGHT ST endoprosthesis (0.67 vs. 0.5 points). During the study, there was no reliable dependence of deformation, retraction and adhesion formation indicators on the type of implant. CONCLUSION: The results of the pilot study showed that all the implants used did not cause any clinically significant adverse reactions or complications. FTOREX endoprostheses with their intraperitoneal installation have anti-adhesive properties that are not inferior to VENTRALIGHT ST or SYMBOTEX composite implants. However, having less rigidity, they are more often deformed and subjected to retraction.

Predictive value of platelet-related hematological markers in indicating the outcomes after laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM).

BACKGROUND: The predictive value of hematological markers in the outcomes after laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) remains to be investigated. We aim to evaluate the role of platelet-related parameters after laparoscopic IPOM in patients with incisional hernias. METHODS: The data of 95 patients who underwent laparoscopic IPOM for appendicectomy-related incisional hernias were retrospectively analyzed. The complete blood count analyses were measured preoperatively, and the outcomes were obtained from hospital records and follow-up calls to patients. Platelet-multiple-lymphocyte index (PLM), neutrophil-leukocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) values were calculated. The patients were grouped based on the recurrence and the postoperative complications after surgery. RESULTS: Using cutoff values acquired by the Youden Index, we found platelet levels < 212.0 × 1000/µl, NLR > 2.33, LMR < 3.17, and PLM < 365.5 were revealed to be statistically significant in the recurrence of hernias based on univariant or multivariant analysis (p = < 0.05). We further divided the patients into two groups based on the cutoff value of PLM and found that a PLM value < 365.5 was significantly associated with the recurrence of incisional hernia (p = 0.018), the occurrence of postoperative seroma (p = 0.044), and there is a tendency that patients with PLM < 365.5 may suffer from other postoperative complications such as cardiopathy, respiratory infection, and hypoproteinemia (p = 0.089). CONCLUSION: The preoperative hematological values, especially PLM, may indicate the outcomes in incisional hernias after laparoscopic IPOM.

Primary closure of the midline abdominal wall defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: analysis of risk factors for failure and outcomes at 5 years follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this prospective study is to report bulging and recurrence rates and to analyze the risk factors responsible for failure, after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) with primary closure of defect (PCD) using a running suture and intraperitoneal mesh placement, at 5-year follow-up. The secondary endpoint is to evaluate 30-day postoperative complications, seroma, and pain. METHODS: PCD failure was defined as the presence of postoperative bulging and/or recurrence. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS). After surgery, fifty-eight patients underwent clinical examination and computed tomography scan to diagnose bulging, recurrence, and seroma (classified according to the Morales-Conde classification). RESULTS: At 60 months follow-up, recurrence was observed in five patients (8.6%), while bulging, not needing a surgical treatment, occurred in fifteen patients (25.9%). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the only risk factor responsible for both outcomes together, bulging and recurrences (p = 0.029), while other considered risk factors as gender, age, body mass index, diabetes, smoke habits, primary or incisional hernia and the ratio defect width/transverse abdominal axis did not achieve the statistically significance. Clinical seroma was diagnosed at one month in eight patients (13.8%). Seromas were observed at one year of follow-up. During the follow-up, pain reduction occurred. CONCLUSION: LVHR has evolved toward more anatomical concepts, with the current trend being the abdominal wall anatomical reconstruction to improve its functionality, reducing seroma rates. Based on results obtained, PCD is a reliable technique with excellent recurrence rate at 5 years follow-up, even when the defect closure may generate tension at the midline. On the other hand, this tension could be related with high bulging rate at long-term, particular in case of patients with COPD.

Full-thickness skin grafts to reinforce the abdominal wall: a cross-sectional histological study comparing intra- and extraperitoneal onlay positions in mice.

INTRODUCTION: In the repair of complex abdominal wall hernia, there can be a strong preference to avoid synthetic or biological implants as reinforcement material. Autologous full-thickness skin grafts (FTSG) have shown promising results. However, there are few clinical data on the use of FTSG in an intraperitoneal position and rudimentary knowledge about postoperative histological appearance of tissue remodelling and repair. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the histological appearance of FTSG in the intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) position. METHODS: Isogeneic FTSG was positioned in the IPOM (10 mice) and the onlay position (10 mice). After eight weeks, tissues were harvested for histological analysis. Tissue structure, inflammation and cell survival were investigated with histological and immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS: Morphology was similar in both positions. Luciferase staining indicated both onlay and IPOM graft cell survival, with microvascular networks present. In both positions, FTSG showed ongoing tissue remodelling processes and cystic formations containing hair and epidermis. Low-grade acute phase and chronic inflammation were present. Integration was observed in 50% of the mice with similar appearances in IPOM and onlay grafts. CONCLUSION: FTSG is tolerated, with comparable results either inside or outside the abdominal cavity, and in line with historic histological evaluations. The results suggest further research on FTSG as a potential future reinforcement material in selected cases of complex abdominal wall hernia repair.

A case of successful laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus technique repair for perineal hernia after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.

The frequency of secondary perineal hernia after abdominoperineal resection has been reported as 0.83%-26%. The optimal surgery for secondary perineal hernia and surgical indication remains controversial. An 87-year-old woman diagnosed with lower rectal cancer underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection. Follow-up computed tomography at 6 months postoperatively revealed secondary perineal hernia. She reported no discomfort and no incarceration was apparent, but she complained of perineal discomfort 3 months later. Laparoscopic repair surgery was performed using an intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus technique with VENTRALIGHT® ST mesh (Medicon, Osaka, Japan), a non-absorbable mesh with a biodegradable coating. No recurrence of peritoneal hernia was seen as of 3 months postoperatively. A time lag can exist between imaging findings and symptom appearance. This laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus technique might become the optimal treatment for perineal hernia.