Structured Workshop for Repair of High-Grade Perineal Lacerations Among Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents, The Need for Repetition and Retraining.

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of structured workshops in improving the knowledge and skills of obstetrics and gynecology residents for repairing high-grade perineal lacerations. Materials and methods: This quasi-experimental multicenter study evaluated the baseline knowledge of obstetrics and gynecology residents using an online patient-management problem (PMP) tool. After the initial evaluation, a workshop was conducted using sponge models to teach the practical technique for repairing high-grade perineal lacerations, including external and internal anal sphincter repair. The residents' knowledge was reassessed by PMP exams at 3 and 6 months after the workshop, and the scores were compared to the baseline statistics. Result: Eighty residents participated in the study, including 26, 22, and 32 at the first, second, and third-year levels of residency, respectively. The total PMP scores significantly improved after three months of the workshop, with an increasing total score from 15.5 (baseline) to 31.3 (p = 0.027) (range of total score from - 63 to + 52). The senior residents performed better before and after three months of the intervention. However, in the six-month follow-up, the total PMP score of all residents decreased to 12.3 with no significant difference with pre-education scores at all levels. Similar significant results were also reported for each PMP question at all levels of residency. Conclusion: The study found that obstetrics and gynecology residents had substandard knowledge in repairing perineal lacerations. Although the training workshop significantly increased residents' knowledge, its effectiveness diminished over time, indicating a need for continuous or periodic training. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13224-023-01792-6.

Perineal injuries during vaginal birth in low-resource countries.

Birth related perineal trauma (BRPT) and obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are leading causes of anal incontinence in women, which negatively impacts on their quality of life, resulting in low self-esteem and abandonment. In low resource countries (LRC), the true incidence is not known and since most births are unattended or occur in community-based health care systems, one can anticipate that it is a significant problem. Dissemination of information to women, education of traditional birth attendants, improvement of resources and transport, and training of health professionals on the detection and appropriate surgical management of these injuries will reduce morbidity and improve outcome. Intrapartum measures such as controlled head descent and perineal support, correct episiotomy techniques and selective use of instruments to assist vaginal births is pivotal in avoiding these injuries. Policy makers should prioritize maternity care in LRC, and research is urgently needed to address all aspects of BRPT.

The association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery.

BACKGROUND: The risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in patients with obesity is relatively understudied and has mixed findings in existing literature. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal delivery. STUDY DESIGN: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample was retrospectively queried to examine 7,385,341 vaginal deliveries from January 2017 to December 2019. The exposure assignment was obesity status. The main outcomes were third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery. Statistical analysis examining the exposure-outcome association included (1) inverse probability of treatment weighting with log-Poisson regression generalized linear model to account for prepregnant and pregnant confounders for the exposure and (2) multinomial regression model to account for delivery factors in the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort. The secondary outcomes included (1) the temporal trends of fourth-degree laceration and its associated factors at cohort level and (2) risk factor patterns for fourth-degree laceration by constructing a classification tree model. RESULTS: In the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort, patients with obesity were less likely to have fourth-degree lacerations and third-degree lacerations than patients without obesity (fourth-degree laceration: 2.3 vs 3.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.69; third-degree laceration: 15.6 vs 20.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.82). In contrast, in patients with obesity vs those without obesity, forceps delivery (54.7 vs 3.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 17.73; 95% confidence interval, 16.17-19.44), vacuum-assisted delivery (19.8 vs 2.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 4.85-5.53), episiotomy (19.2 vs 2.8 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 3.95; 95% confidence interval, 3.71-4.20), and shoulder dystocia (17.8 vs 3.4 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 2.29-2.94) were associated with more than a 2-fold increased risk of fourth-degree perineal laceration. Among the group with obesity, patients who had forceps delivery and shoulder dystocia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (105.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). Among the group without obesity, patients who had forceps delivery, shoulder dystocia, and macrosomia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (294.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). The incidence of fourth-degree perineal laceration decreased by 11.9% over time (P trend=.004); moreover, forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, and episiotomy decreased by 3.8%, 7.6%, and 29.5%, respectively (all, P trend<.05). CONCLUSION: This national-level analysis suggests that patients with obesity are less likely to have obstetric anal sphincter injuries at the time of vaginal delivery. Furthermore, this analysis confirms other known risk factors for fourth-degree laceration, such as forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, episiotomy, and shoulder dystocia. However, we noted a decreasing trend in fourth-degree lacerations, which may be due to evolving obstetrical practices.

Is an episiotomy always necessary during an operative vaginal delivery with vacuum? A longitudinal study.

Objective: The use of episiotomy during operative vaginal birth (OVB) is rather debated among operators and in literature. It is also important to evaluate the indications for which episiotomy is performed. In fact, the consequences of an episiotomy can be invalidating for patients with long-lasting results. The aim of this study is the evaluation of the role of episiotomy during OVB with the vacuum extractor and its correlation with Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIs).Methods: On of 9165 vaginal births, a total of 498 OVB (5.4%) were enrolled in a longitudinal prospective observational study. The incidence of OASIs was evaluated in our population after OVB performed with the vacuum extractor, during which the execution of episiotomy was performed indicated by clinician in charge.Results: OASIs occurred in 4% of the patients (n = 20). Episiotomy was performed in 39% of them (n = 181). OASIs incidence was 6% (n = 17) in the No Episiotomy and 1.8% (n = 3) in Episiotomy group (p<.001). Performance of episiotomy during OVB determined a protective effect against OASIs (p = 0.025 in full cohort and p = 0.013 in the primiparous group). An expulsive phase under one hour was an almost significant protective factor (p = 0.052).Conclusions: The use of episiotomy during OVB was associated with much lower OASIs rates in nulliparous women with a vacuum extraction; OR 0.23 (CI 95% 0.07-0.81) p = 0.037 in nulliparous women and the number necessary to treat was 18 among nulliparous women to prevent 1 OASIs. A further risk factor that emerged from the analysis is a prolonged expulsive period, whereas fundal pressure does not seem to have a statistically significant influence.

Evaluation of Episiotomy Characteristics of EPISCISSORS-60 Scissors Compared with Mayo Scissors: A Single-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: It seems that angled scissors may be able to minimize the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) during vaginal delivery by correcting the angle of the episiotomy incision.For this purpose, this study aimed to evaluate the episiotomy characteristics of EPISCISSORS-60 scissors compared with Mayo scissors. Methods: In this single-blind clinical trial study, 64 pregnant women candidates for natural childbirth were included; 32 women underwent episiotomy with Mayo scissors and 32 underwent episiotomy with the EPISCISSORS-60 instrument. Then, post-suturing angle, incision length, episiotomy, postpartum pain, bleeding volume, and the incidence of OASIS and dyspareunia were assessed. The collected data were analyzed by independent sample t test, chi-square test, and the Fisher exact test. Results: Episiotomy incision length in the EPISCISSORS-60 group with a mean of 4.75 ± 0.72 cm was significantly longer than the Mayo group with a mean of 3.91 ± 0.52cm (P < 0.001). In addition, the incidence of dyspareunia was not significantly different between the 2 groups (6.3% vs 15.6%; P = 0.426). Sphincter damage did not occur at all in the EPISCISSORS-60 group and only 2 cases of grade 3 sphincter rupture occurred in the Mayo group (P = 0.238). The mean of post suturing angle in the EPISCISSORS-60 group (59.09° ± 3.47°) was significantly higher than the Mayo group, with a mean of 31.06° ± 7.21° (P < 0.001). Conclusion: According to the results of the present study, the use of EPISCISSORS-60 can be associated with a higher post-suture episiotomy angle compared with Mayo scissors. As a result, both the incidence of OASIS and its long-term side effects, like dyspareunia, were decreased. However, in our study, the incidence of these complications was very rare and not different between the 2 groups.

Is epidural analgesia an independent risk factor for OASIS? A population-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate whether epidural analgesia is an independent risk factor for OASIS. METHODS: A population-based cohort study including all women who delivered by spontaneous vaginal delivery or by instrumental delivery beyond 24 weeks gestation was conducted. Deliveries occurred between 1988 and 2016 at a large university tertiary medical center. Women with multiple gestations and those lacking prenatal care were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 252,542 women delivered at the Soroka University Medical Center and met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 583 (0.23%) were diagnosed with OASIS. Women with OASIS were more likely to be younger, nulliparous, with suspected fetal macrosomia, had higher rates of labor induction and vacuum extraction delivery, higher rates of conceiving after infertility treatments, more advanced gestational age at delivery, higher mean birth weight, higher rates of post-partum hemorrhage and need for blood transfusions. Use of epidural analgesia during pregnancy was significantly high among the OASIS group. Rates of episiotomy were not significantly different between the groups. Using a multimodal logistic regression model, after controlling for vacuum delivery, large for gestational age, nulliparity, gestational age, ethnicity, maternal age, induction of labor, fertility treatments, non-reassuring fetal heart rate and non-progressive second stage of labor, epidural analgesia was found to be significantly associated with OASIS. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia was found to be an independent risk factor for OASIS in our population.

Neonatal head circumference as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Between 53% and 79% of women will sustain some degree of perineal laceration during vaginal delivery. Third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations are known as obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Timely diagnosis and prompt treatment of obstetric anal sphincter injuries can help to prevent the development of severe consequences like fecal incontinence, urinary incontinence, and rectovaginal fistula. Neonatal head circumference is routinely measured postpartum but is often not mentioned as a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in clinical guidelines. Thus far, no review article on the risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries has discussed the role of neonatal head circumference. This study aimed to review and analyze the relationship between head circumference and the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries among previous studies to conclude whether head circumference should be recognized as an important risk factor. DATA SOURCES: Through study screening on Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Science Direct for articles published between 2013 to 2023, followed by assessment of eligibility, this study ended up reviewing 25 studies, 17 of which were included in the meta-analysis. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only studies that reported both the neonatal head circumference and the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries were included in this review. METHODS: The included studies were appraised using the Dartmouth Library risk of bias assessment checklist. Qualitative synthesis was based on the study population, findings, adjusted confounding factors, and suggested causative links in each study. Quantitative synthesis was conducted using calculation and pooling of odds ratios and inverse variance using Review Manager 5.4.1. RESULTS: A statistically significant association between head circumference and obstetric anal sphincter injuries was reported in 21 of 25 studies; 4 studies reported that head circumference was a true independent risk factor. A meta-analysis of the studies that reported neonatal head circumference as a dichotomous categorical variable with a cutoff point of 35±1 cm yielded statistically significant pooled results (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.04). CONCLUSION: The risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries increased as the neonatal head circumference increased-this should be considered in decision-making during labor and postpartum management to attain the best outcome.

Follow up of women after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI)-What is the role of anorectal testing?

AIMS: To evaluate the benefit of performing anorectal studies on all women following primary obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) repair over performing them on symptomatic women only. METHODS: Women who attended perineal clinic between 2007 and 2020 underwent symptom assessment and anorectal studies at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Anorectal studies including endo anal ultrasound (EAUS) and anal manometry (AM) were performed. The anorectal studies of symptomatic women who were the case group, were compared with asymptomatic women who were the control group. RESULTS: A total of 1348 women were seen in the perineal clinic over 13 years. A total of 454 (33.7%) women were symptomatic. A total of 894 (66.3%) women were asymptomatic. A total of 313 (35%) asymptomatic women had two abnormal anorectal studies, 274 (31%) had abnormal AM alone, and 86 (9.6%) had abnormal EAUS alone. A total of 221 (24.7%) asymptomatic women had normal anorectal studies. CONCLUSION: Almost 70% of women were asymptomatic 6 months following primary OASI repair. Most had at least one abnormal anorectal study result. Selectively performing anorectal tests on symptomatic women would not identify asymptomatic women at risk of future faecal incontinence following further vaginal birth. Without anorectal study results, women would not receive accurate counseling about the risks of vaginal birth. Anorectal studies should be offered to all women following OASI where resources allow.

Clinical, ultrasonographic, and functional outcomes after obstetric anal sphincter injury primary repair: A single-center experience.

OBJECTIVE: To present clinical and instrumental sequelae after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), evaluating correlations between intrapartum severity of lesions, postpartum symptoms, and sonographic and manometric findings; outcomes during subsequent deliveries were also evaluated. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated all consecutive women who sustained an OASIS between 2015 and 2020. Postpartum symptoms, anorectal manometry (ARM), and three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 107 women underwent OASIS primary repair; 84 (78.5%) of them were asymptomatic after 1 month. The presence and severity of symptoms showed a great correlation with instrumental outcomes in terms of maximum resting pressure, squeeze pressure increment (SPI), circumferential extension of defect for both external anal sphincter (EAS) and internal anal sphincter (IAS), and EAS, IAS and total Starck scores. There was a significant correlation between ARM and 3D-EAUS findings, with the exception of SPI, for which the abnormalities were not predictable based on EAUS results. CONCLUSION: Both ARM and EAUS findings after OASIS are directly related to each other, and associated with symptoms. These instrumental tools may be useful for OASIS assessment and counseling.

Correlation of anorectal symptoms and endoanal ultrasound findings after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

INTRODUCTION: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) predispose to development of anorectal symptoms that affect women's quality of life. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted for all women with singleton vaginal deliveries who had a primary OASIS repair and attended the Postpartum Perineal Clinic between July 1st 2017 and December 31st 2020. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board. The purpose of this study was (1) to determine correlation between endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) findings and anorectal symptoms quantified by the St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS), (2) to determine the incidence of residual anal sphincter defects, and (3) to determine the rate of clinical overdiagnosis of OASIS. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between anorectal symptoms and EAUS findings. RESULTS: A total of 247 participants with clinical diagnosis of OASIS met the inclusion criteria. A 3rd-degree tear was identified in 126 (51.0%) and 4th-degree tear was identified in 30 (12.1%) participants. In participants with sonographic evidence of OASIS, there was a statistically significant weak positive correlation between the size of residual defect and SMIS for both external anal sphincter (EAS) (r = .3723, p < .0001) and internal anal sphincter (IAS) (r = .3122, p = .0180). Residual defect in the anorectal sphincter of greater than 1 hour (> 30°) in width was present in 64.3% participants with 3rd-degree tear and 86.7% participants with 4th-degree tear. The rate of overdiagnosis was 36.8%. CONCLUSION: The size of residual defect of EAS and IAS has a weak positive correlation with anorectal symptoms, emphasizing the importance of EAUS for counselling regarding mode of subsequent delivery.

Implementation of Episcissors-60 for Prevention of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS) in a Centre with Low Episiotomy Rates.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether introduction of Episcissors-60 into a labour and birth unit would decrease the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). METHODS: A before and after quality improvement study was conducted between April 1, 2020, and March 31, 2021. All patients who had a vaginal delivery were included in this study. All healthcare providers who perform vaginal deliveries were offered an educational session. Episcissors-60 were then introduced into a labour and birth unit. The primary outcome measure was the change in incidence of OASIS before and after introduction of Episcissors-60. Secondary outcome measures were episiotomy rates before and after introduction of Episcissors-60, device-related adverse events, and provider satisfaction and feedback. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests, independent t tests, and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: A total of 1383 vaginal deliveries occurred before and 1254 vaginal deliveries after introduction of Episcissors-60. There was a decrease in the total OASIS rate from 7.37% of all vaginal deliveries before and 5.37% after introduction of Episcissors-60 (P = 0.037). The episiotomy rate was 11.42% before and 9.97% after introduction of Episcissors-60 (P = 0.228). OASIS rate in women who had an episiotomy was 12.02% before and 13.60% after introduction of Episcissors-60 (P = 0.421). CONCLUSION: Although introduction of Episcissors-60 was associated with a statistically significant decrease in total OASIS rate, there was no difference in OASIS rate within the subgroup that received an episiotomy. Therefore, reduction in the total OASIS rate in this study cannot be attributed to the use of Episcissors-60.

Regional and clinical guidelines for prevention and care of obstetric anal sphincter injuries - A critical frame analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Policy documents govern how the prevention and care of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are implemented. Thus, in the absence of Swedish national guidelines on OASIS, differing views may be visible in the regional and local policy documents. Therefore, we aimed to analyse regional and local policies, guidelines, and care programs on the prevention of OASIS and care for OASIS-affected women in a Swedish context by applying a critical frame analysis inspired by Verloo. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional study of existing policy documents from Swedish healthcare regions was performed. The documents were analysed using Verloo's critical frame analysis. FINDINGS: We found that OASIS was framed as a preventable problem addressed by skilled protective manoeuvres of the healthcare staff. Education, communication, and teamwork were three frames of crucial solutions to minimise the prevalence of OASIS. However, complicating power dimensions between professional groups and between professionals and birthing women were identified. Furthermore, several discursive struggles were found, predominantly regarding the scientific evidence for the suggested prevention and care. CONCLUSION: The policy documents emphasised that OASIS is preventable, and improved education, communication, and teamwork could diminish the OASIS prevalence. Nevertheless, power dimensions and discursive struggles may challenge the preventive efforts. Furthermore, each Swedish region has the sovereignty to develop its policies, which was reflected in our findings and may imply inequities in care provision. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop comprehensive national high-quality guidelines of high quality for OASIS prevention and care so that all women giving birth have access to equal care and treatment in Sweden.

Use of antibiotics in women undergoing correction of an obstetric anal sphincter injury: Results from a national Israeli survey.

OBJECTIVE: Obstetric anal sphincter injures (OASIS) have long-term implications on women's health. Administration of antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment following OASIS repair is controversial. We conducted a national survey to provide data about practice routines regarding antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment following OASIS repair in Israeli labor and delivery units. METHODS: A national survey was performed among obstetricians and gynecologists from 24 university-affiliated delivery centers within the jurisdiction of the Israeli Ministry of Health during 2020. Representatives from each center completed the "Google form" electronic survey. For each questionnaire item, the most common answer was chosen to represent the center's answer. RESULTS: The number of physicians who responded per center varied from 1 to 14 (median, 3.5). Preoperative and postoperative antibiotic treatment was given in 75% and 92% of the centers, respectively. While most centers (58.3%) recommend pelvic floor physical therapy on release, recommendations about functional radiologic tests vary. In all centers, there is a designated clinic for postpartum follow-up of OASIS. Most centers (83%) allow trial of vaginal delivery in the subsequent pregnancy, on an individual basis. CONCLUSION: Heterogeneity exists in managing OASIS in Israel, particularly regarding administration of antibiotics. Further studies are needed to examine the consequences of different management protocols.

Effects of a structural simulation curriculum for the repair of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short-term and skill-retention effects of a structural simulation curriculum for the repair of obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). METHODS: This prepost experimental study recruited 31 obstetrics and gynecology residents from Peking Union Medical College Hospital. OASIS repair skill evaluations (at all timepoints) comprised a task-specific checklist (TSC), global rating scale (GRS), and pass/fail grade. A beef-tongue model was adopted in the simulation curriculum. After baseline testing, residents completed a structured 1-h workshop. Two weeks later, a second test was performed, followed by a one-to-one teaching workshop, with the proper completion of a checklist as the end-point. Three months later, residents completed a third test. RESULTS: The overall pass rate at baseline was 16.1%, with higher GRS scores (p = 0.035) in senior residents. Additionally, previewing the procedure before class and a history of OASIS repair observation were associated with higher TSC and GRS scores. Significant skill improvement was observed in the second and third tests, with pass rates of 96.8% and 93.5% respectively. Both TSC and GRS scores were improved compared with baseline (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A structural simulation curriculum integrating deliberate practice under supervision improves OASIS repair competence and achieves satisfactory skill retention.

The incidence of anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury graded using the Sultan classification: a network meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically determine and compare the incidence of anal incontinence between those with different grades of obstetric anal sphincter injury. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to April 2021. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies investigating the incidence of anal incontinence following an obstetric anal sphincter injury that was graded using the Sultan classification were eligible for inclusion. To allow comparison between individual tear grades (3a, 3b, 3c, fourth), a network meta-analysis was performed using Stata (version 15.1). METHODS: For binary outcomes, odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were reported. Obstetric anal sphincter injury grades were ranked from the best clinical outcome to the worst clinical outcome. The percentage chance of each grade taking each rank with regards to outcome was calculated. Study quality and risk of bias was assessed using the relevant tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS: Of the 696 studies identified, 10 were eligible for inclusion and were included in the network meta-analysis (n=2467 women). The mean incidence of anal incontinence among those with 3a tears was 22.4% (range, 6.1%-51.2%), 24.9% (range, 6.9%-46.7%) among those with 3b tears, 26.8% (range, 0%-55.6%) among those with 3c tears, and 28.6% (0%-71.4%) among those with fourth-degree tears. Anal incontinence incidence was found to be significantly higher among those with 3c (odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.94) and fourth-degree tears (odds ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-4.02) than among those with 3a tears. In addition, anal incontinence incidence was significantly higher among those with fourth-degree tears (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.22) than among those with 3b tears. Those with 3a tears had the highest probability of having the best clinical outcome; those with 3b; second-, 3c; third- and fourth-degree tears had the highest probability of having the worst clinical outcome. Overall, all studies had a high or unclear risk of bias across 1 or more assessed element. CONCLUSION: This was a network meta-analysis comparing the incidence of anal incontinence among those with different grades of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Increasing tear-grade severity is associated with worse clinical outcomes. This study provides useful, clinically applicable information that can assist clinicians in the counseling of women following an obstetric anal sphincter injury. In addition, it highlights the importance of accurately diagnosing the obstetric anal sphincter injury grade and subsequently performing the appropriate repair.

The role of anal manometry in the follow-up of women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI).

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Mode of birth (MOB) following OASI is determined by choice, symptoms and anorectal study results in asymptomatic women. Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) is the gold-standard imaging modality. EAUS use in MOB counselling is supported by strong evidence. Less is understood about how anal manometry (AM) influences MOB counselling. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted from 2007 to 2020. Women underwent symptom assessment using validated ePAQ and St Mark's incontinence score (SMIS). Anorectal studies using EAUS and AM were performed. The case group was the normal ultrasound group and the control group was the abnormal ultrasound group. Both groups were compared with normal and abnormal AM result groups. RESULTS: A total of 1348 women were included over 13 years. Among these, 454 women were symptomatic, 894 were asymptomatic; 274 (31%) asymptomatic women had isolated abnormal AM results, 313 (35%) had two abnormal anorectal results and 221 (24.7%) had normal anorectal results. Eighty-six asymptomatic women (10.4%) had isolated abnormal EAUS results, 138 (30.4%) symptomatic women had isolated abnormal AM, 221 (48.7%) had two abnormal anorectal results and 57 (12.6%) had normal anorectal results. Thirty-eight symptomatic women (8.4%) had an isolated abnormal EAUS result. CONCLUSIONS: AM identifies more women with sphincter function impairment than EAUS alone. Without AM, almost one third of asymptomatic women would not have been identified and could have been inadequately counselled. Performing AM and EAUS together captured most women with compromised anal sphincter function. We conclude that AM should be performed in all women with OASI alongside EAUS to enable accurate MOB counselling.

Short and long term results of anatomical reconstruction of perineal body and sphincter complex in obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

Objectives: The effective way to reduce the risk of fecal incontinence (FI) in primary repaired obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) patients is to accurately detect the injury and provide complete anatomical reconstruction. The aim of the study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term results of OASIS cases that were diagnosed by an experienced surgical team and whose perineal body and anal sphincters were reconstructed separately. Material and Methods: Sixteen patients that required consultations due to anal sphincter damage during vaginal delivery and underwent anatomical reconstruction due to Grade 3c and Grade 4 sphincter damage between 2007 and 2019 were included in the study. These cases were divided into three groups [Group 1 (≤12 months), Group 2 (12-60 months), Group 3 (≥60 months)] according to the time elapsed until anal manometry, and incontinence questionnaires were conducted in the postoperative period. Recto-anal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), mean resting (IB) and squeezing (SB) pressures were measured by anal manometry. Anal incontinence (AI) and FI rates were determined by questionnaires. Anal sphincter damage repair techniques (overlapping, end-to-end) were determined. These parameters were compared between the three groups. Results: Mean age of the patients was 27.5 (16-35) years. Six (37.5%) patients had Grade 3c, while 10 (62.5%) had Grade 4 injury. The overall mean RP and SP were 35 (26-56) mmHg and 67 (31-100) mmHg, respectively. Mean RP and SP were 46/67 mmHg, 33.5/75.5 mmHg, and 37.5/70.5 mmHg in Groups 1, 2, and 3 respectively. There was no difference between the three groups in terms of mean RP and SP (p= 0.691, p= 0.673). The rate of AI and FI in all patients were 18.75% and 12.5%, respectively while the rate of severe AI incontinence was 6%. Severe AI was observed in 1 (16.7%) case in Group 1, mild AI was observed in 1 (25%) case in group 2, and in 1 (16.7%) case in Group 3. RAIR was positive in all patients. In Group 1, 5 (83.3%) patients underwent overlapping repair, and in Group 3, 6 (100%) patients underwent end-to-end repair. This difference was statistically significant (p= 0.011). Conclusion: In vaginal births, evaluation of anal sphincter damage, determination of perineal body structures and anal sphincters separately and performing anatomical reconstruction when needed significantly reduce the rate of FI in the short and long term.

Can transperineal ultrasound improve the diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Women with missed obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) are at an increased risk of anal incontinence. Our aim was to assess the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) compared with clinical examination for detecting OASIs. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of women undergoing their first vaginal delivery. Perineal trauma was initially assessed by the doctor or midwife performing the delivery (accoucheur) and women were then re-examined by the trained research fellow (KW). A 3D TPUS was performed immediately after delivery before suturing to identify OASIs. The research fellow's clinical diagnosis was used as the reference standard. A power calculation determined that 216 women would be required for the study. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-four women participated and 226 (86%) delivered vaginally. Twenty-one (9%) sustained OASIs. Six (29%) of these tears were missed by the accoucheur but were identified by the research fellow. TPUS identified 19 of the 21 (90.5%) OASIs. One percent (n = 2) had sonographic appearances of an anal sphincter defect that was not seen clinically. The positive and negative predictive value of TPUS to detect OASIs was 91% and 99% respectively. TPUS identified 91% of OASIs compared with 71% detected by the accoucheur, which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The detection rate of OASIs with TPUS and with the clinical findings of the accoucheur was similar. Given the training and financial implications needed for TPUS, attention needs to be focused on the training of midwives and doctors to identify anal sphincter injuries by clinical examination.

The clinical progression and wound healing rate of dehisced perineal tears healing by secondary intention: A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the clinical progression of dehisced perineal wounds healing by secondary intention and to investigate the incidence and factors associated with delayed healing. METHODS: Secondary analysis of women with perineal wound dehiscence recruited into the PERINEAL study between August 2020- August 2021 (NCT04480684). Three-dimensional wound measurements were taken with the Silhouette® camera. Significant bacterial colonisation was diagnosed using the MolecuLight i:X camera. As it is agreed that acute wounds should heal sufficiently within four weeks, diagnosis of delayed wound healing was made if a wound took longer than four weeks to heal. A wound was deemed to have healed if there was complete wound closure, with no evidence of granulation tissue or signs of infection on clinical examination. RESULTS: 55 women with perineal wound dehiscence participated. Wounds took an average of 3 weeks to heal (range 1-16) and 38 (69.1%) wounds healed in ≤ 4 weeks from the first clinical review. 17 (30.9%) wounds had significant bacterial colonisation, identified on bacterial fluorescence imaging. Women with a wound area of < 1.60 cm2 or wound perimeter of < 5.57 cm had a 70% probability of wound healing in ≤ 4 weeks. 47.1% of wounds with significant bacteria colonisation healed within 4 weeks, in comparison to 78.9% of wounds not colonised (p = 0.03). 25.0 % (n = 2) of wounds with OASI healed within 4 weeks, in comparison to 76.5% (n = 36) of wounds with no OASI (p = 0.02). Bacterial fluorescence (OR 0.21 (0.05-0.87)) and OASIs (OR 0.09 (0.01-0.66)) were independent risk factors associated with delayed wound healing. The model including wound area, fluorescence and OASIs had the greatest AUC (0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.94) indicating the best predictive model. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe healing outcomes of dehisced perineal wounds and factors associated with delayed healing. The study findings will help clinicians counsel women effectively and tailor follow-up care at the first assessment, based on individual risk factors.