Nurse-led intervention to improve oral mucosal health of intubated patients in the intensive care unit: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study aimed to explore the effectiveness of an oral care intervention with Tegaderm on the oral mucosal health of intubated patients. METHODS: A total of 70 intubated patients were included and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups, clean water brushing teeth (n = 23), brushing teeth combined with mouthwash (BTM) (n = 23), and brushing teeth combined with mouthwash and Tegaderm (BTMT) (n = 24). The Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS) was applied to evaluate the patient's oral mucosal health before and after oral care intervention. RESULTS: The BTMT group had lower OMAS scores in almost all regions of the oral cavity, compared to the brushing teeth and BTM groups. The general linear model for repeated measurement indicated the BTMT group had the lowest total OMAS scores from Day 2 to Day 4 after the initiation of baseline OMAS evaluation. Of the 3 intervention groups, the BTMT group had the shortest length of endotracheal intubation. The BTMT group had the lowest incidence rate of ventilator-associated pneumonia; however, no significant between-group differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: BTMT effectively reduced the decline in oral mucosal health that was caused by endotracheal intubation and shortened the length of endotracheal intubation.

Comparing the Experiences of Participants With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia During an Oral Health Intervention.

Background and Objectives: Cognitive impairment is associated with poor oral health outcomes. Oral hygiene tasks are an essential target of interventions aiming to improve oral health for older adults with cognitive impairment. We aimed to examine whether experiences in an oral health intervention based on the Adaptive Leadership Framework for Chronic Illness differed between individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild dementia (MD) and their respective care partners. Research Design and Methods: This was a secondary analysis using directed content analysis and then an interpretive-description approach to analyze the data from a theory-driven intervention study. We included 10 people with MCI and their care partners (n = 20) and 8 people with MD and their care partners (n = 16) in the treatment arm of the intervention. For each participant, we analyzed audio recordings of 4 intervention coaching sessions, each ranging between 30 and 45 min. We managed the data and coding using ATLAS.TI software. Results: Participants in both the MCI and MD groups experienced similar challenges in adapting to changes in oral hygiene techniques, and both groups worked on learning new oral hygiene techniques taught by the dental hygienist and meeting individualized goals developed with their care partner, interventionist, and hygienist. On the other hand, there were subtle differences in technical challenges between participants in MCI and MD groups; participants in the MCI group reacted more actively to dental hygienist suggestions than the MD group. Discussion and Implications: Study findings provide information about how researchers and clinicians might tailor interventions to meet the learning needs of individuals and care partners in each group.

Evaluation of effects of perioperative oral care intervention on hospitalization stay and postoperative infection in patients undergoing lung cancer intervention.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study investigated the effect of perioperative oral care intervention on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lung cancer resection, in terms of the length of postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative respiratory infections. METHODS: In total, 585 patients underwent lung resection for lung cancer, 397 received perioperative oral care intervention, whereas the remaining 188 did not. This study retrospectively investigated the demographic and clinical characteristics (including postoperative complications and postoperative hospital stay) of each group. To determine whether perioperative oral care intervention was independently associated with either postoperative hospital stay or postoperative respiratory infections, multivariate analysis, multiple regression analysis, and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Parameters significantly associated with a prolonged postoperative hospital stay in lung cancer surgery patients were older age, postoperative complications, increased intraoperative bleeding, more invasive operative approach (e.g., open surgery), and lack of perioperative oral care intervention (standard partial regression coefficient (ß) = 0.083, p = 0.027). Furthermore, older age and longer operative time were significant independent risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative respiratory infections. Lack of perioperative oral care intervention was a potential risk factor for the occurrence of postoperative respiratory infections, although not statistically significant (odds ratio = 2.448, 95% confidence interval = 0.966-6.204, p = 0.059). CONCLUSION: These results highlight the importance of perioperative oral care intervention prior to lung cancer surgery, in order to shorten postoperative hospital stay and reduce the risk of postoperative respiratory infections.