Patient preferences for the provision of NHS medicines helpline services: a discrete choice experiment.

Introduction: Patient medicines helpline services (PMHS) can reduce harm and improve medicines adherence and patient satisfaction after hospital discharge. There is little evidence of which PMHS attributes are most important to patients. This would enable PMHS providers to prioritise their limited resources to maximise patient benefit. Methods: Patient preferences for PMHS attributes were measured using a discrete choice experiment. Seven attributes were identified from past research, documentary analysis and stakeholder consultation. These were used to produce a D-efficient design with two blocks of ten choice sets incorporated into an online survey. Adults in the UK who took more than one medicine were eligible to complete the survey and were recruited via the Research for the Future database. Preferences were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Associations between participant characteristics and preferences were investigated with latent class models. Results: 460 participants completed the survey. The most valued attributes were weekend opening (willingness-to-pay, WTP: £11.20), evening opening (WTP: £8.89), and receiving an answer on the same day (WTP: £9.27). Alternative contact methods, immediate contact with a pharmacist and helpline location were valued less. Female gender and full-time work were associated with variation in preferences. For one latent class containing 27% of participants, PMHS location at the patient's hospital was the most valued attribute. Discussion: PMHS providers should prioritise extended opening hours and answering questions on the same day. Limitations include a non-representative sample in terms of ethnicity, education and geography, and the exclusion of people without internet access.

Public deliberation to assess patient views on biosimilar medication switching for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Biosimilars are highly similar, but not identical, versions of originator biologic medications. Switching patients to biosimilars presents an opportunity to mitigate rising drug costs and expand patient access to important biologic therapies. However, decreased patient acceptance and adherence to biosimilar medications have been reported, which can lead to loss of treatment response, adverse reactions, and inefficient resource utilization. Understanding patient perceptions of biosimilars and biosimilar switching is needed to inform patient-centered care strategies that promote efficient resource utilization. METHODS: We used democratic deliberation methods to solicit the informed and considered opinions of patients regarding biosimilar switching. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; n = 29) from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) participated in 5-hour deliberation sessions over two days. Following educational presentations with experts, participants engaged in facilitated small group discussions. Transcripts and facilitators' notes were used to identify key themes. Participants completed surveys pre- and post-deliberation to collect sociodemographic and clinical features as well as to assess IBD treatment knowledge and attitudes toward care and approaches to biosimilar switching. RESULTS: Five major themes emerged from the small group discussions in the context of biosimilar switching: 1) concerns about adverse consequences and unclear risk-benefit balance; (2) importance of communication and transparency; (3) desire for shared decision making and patient involvement in treatment decisions; (4) balancing cost-saving with competing priorities; and (5) advocating for individualized care and prioritization based on risk levels. These views led participants to favor approaches that prioritize switching the sickest patients last (i.e., those with poorly controlled disease) and that offer patients control and choices around biosimilar switching. Participants also expressed preferences for combining elements of different approaches to maximize fairness. CONCLUSIONS: Approaches to biosimilar switching should consider patients' desires for transparency and effective communication about biosimilar switching and engagement in their medical decision-making as part of patient-centered care. Incorporating patient preferences around biosimilar switching is critical when navigating the quality and affordability of care in resource constrained settings, both within the VHA and in other healthcare systems.

Exploring GP and patient attitudes towards the use and deprescribing of dietary supplements: a survey study in Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Dietary supplements are commonly used by older adults, but their inappropriate use may lead to adverse events. To optimise medication use, general practitioners (GPs) ideally are aware of all substances that patients use, including supplements. This cross-sectional study explored the use of dietary supplements by older patients with polypharmacy, the rate at which they disclosed this use to their GPs, and compared patients' and GPs' attitudes towards discontinuing dietary supplements. METHODS: Ten GPs in Swiss primary care recruited five to ten of their older patients taking ≥ 5 regular medications. Both GPs and their patients completed a survey on patients' use of dietary supplements and attitudes towards deprescribing those. We described and compared their responses. We assessed the association of supplement disclosure with patient characteristics using multilevel logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Three out of ten GPs (30%) were female, and GPs' average age was 52 years (SD = 8). 45% of patients were female (29/65). Most patients (n = 45, 70%) were taking ≥ 1 supplement. On average, patients reported to be using three supplements (SD = 2). In 60% (n = 39) of patients, GPs were unaware of ≥ 1 supplement used. We did not find evidence for an association between supplement disclosure to GPs and patient characteristics. Only 8% (n = 5) of patients and 60% (n = 6) of GPs reported ≥ 1 supplement they would be willing to deprescribe and none of the supplements reported by GPs and patients to deprescribe matched. CONCLUSION: Swiss GPs were unaware of many dietary supplements used by their older patients, which may affect medication optimisation efforts.

Different diseases, different needs: Patient preferences for gene therapy in lysosomal storage disorders, a probabilistic threshold technique survey.

BACKGROUND: Gene therapy is currently in development for several monogenetic diseases including lysosomal storage disorders. Limited evidence is available on patient preferences for gene therapy in this population. In this study, we compare gene therapy-related risk tolerance between people affected by three lysosomal storage diseases currently faced with different therapeutic options and prognoses. METHODS: A survey including the probabilistic threshold technique was developed in which respondents were asked to choose between gene therapy and the current standard of care. The attributes included to establish participants' risk tolerance were previously identified in focus groups of affected people or their representatives, namely: risk of mild side effects, severe side effects, the need for additional medication, and the likelihood of long-term effectiveness. The survey was distributed among people receiving outpatient care for type 1 Gaucher disease (good prognosis with current treatment options), Fabry disease (varying prognosis with current treatment options, XY-genotype on average more severely affected than XX), and parents representing people with severe forms of mucopolysaccharidosis type III A/B (poor prognosis, no disease-specific therapy available). RESULTS: A total of 85 surveys were completed (15 Gaucher disease respondents, 62 Fabry disease respondents (17 self-identifying male), eight parents of ten people with mucopolysaccharidosis type III). Disease groups with higher disease severity trended towards higher risk tolerance: Gaucher disease respondents were most cautious and predominantly preferred the current standard of care as opposed to MPS III representatives who were more risk tolerant. Respondents with Fabry disease were most heterogeneous in their risk tolerance, with male participants being more risk tolerant than female participants. Long-term effectiveness was the attribute in which respondents tolerated the least risk. CONCLUSIONS: People affected by a lysosomal storage disease associated with a poorer prognosis and less effective current treatment options trended towards more risk tolerance when choosing between gene therapy and the current standard of care. This study shows the importance of involvement of patient preferences before and during the development process of new treatment modalities such as gene therapy for rare diseases, to ensure that innovative therapies align with the wishes and needs of people affected by these diseases.

Sources and processes of social influence on health-related choices: A systematic review based on a social-interdependent choice paradigm.

BACKGROUND: Most choices in healthcare are not made in social isolation. However, current econometric models treat patients' preferences as the sole determinants of their choices. Through the lens of sociology and medical sociology theories, this paper presents a systematic literature review of identifiable social influences on patients' choices, serving as a first step in developing a social-interdependent choice paradigm. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guideline and using nine databases, we identified the individual agents or groups involved in health-related choices, the functional content through which social relationships influence patients, and the choice constructs affected by these processes. From 9036 screened articles, we selected 208 to develop an analytical framework connecting social relationships with choice constructs. RESULTS: Social influences predominantly come from family, friends, specialized physicians, and general practitioners. We decomposed the functional content of social relationships into functions and contents. Dyadic interactions and expert knowledge were prominent functions, followed by social control. Prescriptive and informational contents were prevalent, followed by instrumental and emotional ones. Expert knowledge and social norms aligned with prescriptive and informational signals, while dyadic interactions provide emotional and instrumental signals. Reference points for social norms included friends, coworkers, and patients. Social relationships primarily impact which alternatives are evaluated, followed by alternative evaluation strategies and goal selection. Distinctions between medical domains and dimensions emerged, highlighting how the medical area conditions the social influence process. CONCLUSION: This systematic review presents a comprehensive framework that elucidates the social influence process in healthcare patient decision-making. By detailing the functional content of social relationships into functions and contents and linking these components to the elements of the choice process, we created a structured approach to understanding how social relationships impact patient choices. This will facilitate the systematic integration of social relationships into econometric models of patient choice.

Urban-rural differences in preferences for traditional Chinese medicine services among chronic disease patients: a discrete choice experiment.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, the demand for medical services from chronic disease patients has become diversified and personalized. The advantages and role of traditional Chinese medicine in the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases gradually emerging. The preferences and willingness to pay for traditional Chinese medicine services (TCMS) among patients with chronic diseases, as well as any disparities between urban and rural patients, have not been examined in past studies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the preferences of chronic disease patients for TCMS, explore the value/importance that patients place on different treatment attributes, and evaluate whether there are urban-rural differences in their preferences and willingness to pay for TCMS. METHODS: A total of 317 patients from Jiangsu Province, China participated in a discrete choice experiment that elicited the preferences for TCMS. The choice questions were constructed by six attributes: out-of-pocket (OOP) cost, institution, medical provider, treatment method, treatment duration, treatment efficacy. Mixed logit models were used to estimate the stated preference and marginal willingness to pay for each attribute. RESULTS: The choice preferences of chronic disease patients for TCMS in this study were influenced by the four attributes: institution, treatment method, and treatment efficacy, and OOP cost. Improvements in treatment efficacy were the most concerning, followed by being treated in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) hospital. Patients were willing to pay more to get better treatment outcomes. Compared with primary care institutions, patients were willing to pay more for treatment in TCM hospitals. The preferences for economic attribute (OOP cost) varied between urban and rural areas, and rural patients tended to favor scenarios that imposed a lower economic burden on them. CONCLUSION: The chronic disease patients' preferences for TCMS were determined mainly by treatment efficacy but also by institution, treatment method and OOP cost. The urban-rural difference in preference identified in this study highlights that effective policy interventions should consider the characteristics of patients' demand in different regions.

Patient preferences for advanced therapies in ulcerative colitis using conjoint analysis.

Background/Aims: Selecting an optimal advanced therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC) is difficult because of the increasing number of available therapies. This study assessed UC patients' preferences for drug profiles in decision-making regarding advanced therapies using conjoint analysis. Methods: A web-based survey was conducted from October to November 2023 in patients with UC aged ≥ 18 years with prior oral 5-aminosalicylic acid treatment (UMIN000052327). We quantified the importance of drug attributes (location of administration, route/frequency of administration, speed of onset-of-action, maintenancesustainability, risk of serious adverse events within 1 year, and novelty of the drug) and the part-worth utility of attribute levels in mild and severe symptom scenarios, including among employed versus unemployed patients. Results: Of 372 patients who completed the survey, 365 were evaluated. Patient preferences were generally highly individualized. The route/frequency of administration was the most important attribute in both the mild and severe symptom scenarios. Oral administration was preferred in the mild symptom scenario, whereas no specific preference was observed in the severe symptom scenario. The route/ frequency of administration was more valued in the mild symptom scenario than in the severe one, whereas speed of onset of action was more valued in the severe symptom scenario. No significant difference was found in the preference for drug profiles between employed and unemployed patients. Conclusions: Patient preferences for the route/frequency of administration, as well as other drug profiles, change with disease severity but demonstrate substantial interindividual variability. Therefore, shared decision-making is important to incorporate patients' perspectives into the selection of advanced therapies.

Digital versus Speculum-Based Balloon Catheter Insertion for Labor Induction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Digital vs speculum-based balloon IOL.

OBJECTIVES: Induction of labor is commonly undertaken when ongoing pregnancy poses risk to either mother or fetus. Often cervical preparation is required with mechanical methods increasingly popular due to their improved safety. This study evaluates the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of digital versus speculum-based balloon insertion for cervical preparation, aiming to identify gaps and inform future research. DATA SOURCE: PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from database inception until 30 June 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Included studies were randomized controlled trials comparing digital versus speculum-based insertion of catheter-related balloons for labor induction in individuals with viable singleton pregnancies, in both inpatient and outpatient settings, written in English. Exclusions included studies not using cervical balloons, comparisons to non-balloon methods, non-human studies, and non-primary literature like guidelines, reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces. METHODS: Title and abstract screening were performed by four authors. Full-text articles were assessed against inclusion criteria. Selection was agreed upon by consensus among three authors, with a fourth consulted for disputes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 for randomized trials. A meta-analysis was also performed. RESULTS: Out of 3397 studies, four met the inclusion criteria, all being randomized controlled trials with some concerns in at least one domain but no high risk of bias. Two studies found digital insertion significantly less painful than speculum-based insertion (p<0.001), while one reported no difference (p=0.72). Maternal satisfaction was comparable, with one study favouring digital insertion (p=0.011). Meta-analysis findings for other outcome measures suggest no difference between speculum or digital insertion. However, due to substantial heterogeneity, findings for procedural time, time from induction-to-delivery, and epidural rate should be cautiously interpreted. CONCLUSIONS: Digital insertion for cervical preparation appears associated with reduced pain and higher patient acceptability compared to speculum-based insertion. Additionally, efficacy and safety were comparable, indicating it is a preferable option for clinical use. There was no difference in other procedural, obstetric, or neonatal outcomes, however, more rigorous research employing standardised outcome measures is needed to facilitate a clinically meaningful interpretation.

Development of a home-based pre-exposure prophylaxis care delivery system for long-acting injectable cabotegravir: a formative exploration of patient preferences.

Cabotegravir (CAB-LA), the only Food and Drug Administration-approved injectable pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), is effective and may address PrEP uptake disparities among Black and Latino sexual and gender minority (SGM) men. Uptake of CAB-LA may require developing innovative non-clinic-based care delivery strategies in home-based settings. We explored SGM men's opinions on a future home-based CAB-LA PrEP care service to guide the adaptation of PrEP@Home, an existing home-based PrEP system for oral PrEP. Through 14 in-depth interviews with current or former SGM male participants in the PrEP@Home study, we explored the acceptability of a home-based injectable PrEP system and examined visit and communication-related preferences. All participants considered home-based CAB-LA care to be acceptable and 8/14 would utilize the system if available. Convenience and comfort with using a home-based system impacted the overall acceptance of the approach. Factors influencing acceptability included clinical teams' affiliation with healthcare systems, a credentialed two-person team, and staff identity verification methods. Logistical preferences included communicating pre-visit patient instructions, allowing flexible scheduling hours, and the use of text, phone calls, or mobile app communication methods based on urgency. Conclusively, a home-based CAB-LA PrEP delivery system was acceptable among the interviewed SGM men, guiding its development and future implementation.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03569813.

Outcomes that matter to patients with cancer: living longer and living better.

Oncologists and cancer patients generally agree that the primary goals of advanced cancer treatment are to lengthen and/or improve patient survival. Yet over the last two decades, clinical trials of new cancer treatments have moved away from measuring outcomes that matter to patients. Increasingly, new drugs for advanced cancer treatment reach the market by demonstrating improvements in surrogate endpoints such as progression-free survival (PFS), which is not a measure of how a patient feels, functions, or survives. Research has shown that when patients are fully informed about the meaning of PFS, about half would not choose additional treatment for any magnitude of gain in PFS in the absence of an overall survival improvement. It's time to get back to designing trials that answer clinically meaningful questions and measure the outcomes that truly matter to patients. Engaging educated patient advocates in meaningful ways in clinical trial design and reporting would be a step in this direction.

Tools and Strategies to Integrate Multi-Domain Information for Personalized Decision-Making in Oncological Care Pathways: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: There is a growing interest in personalized decision-making in oncology. According to the Integrated Oncological Decision-Making Model (IODM), decisions should be based on information from three domains: (1) medical technical information, (2) patients' general health status and (3) patients' preferences and goals. Little is known about what kind of tool/strategy is used to collect the information, by whom this is collected (nurse, clinician) when this is collected (moment in the care pathway), and how this information should be collected and integrated within decision-making in oncological care pathways, and what its impact is. Methods: We searched PUBMED, Embase and Web of Science in October 2023 for studies looking at tools to collect and integrate information from the three domains of the IODM. We extracted data on the content and implementation of these tools, and on decision and patient outcomes. Results: The search yielded 2576 publications, of which only seven studies described collection of information from all three domains (inclusion criteria). In the seven included studies, information on the three domains was collected through dialogue, questionnaires, and assessments (what) by a nurse (2 out of 7 studies) or by other members of the Multi-Disciplinary Team (by whom) (5 out of 7 studies). Members of the Multi-Disciplinary Team subsequently integrated the information (5 out 7 studies) during their meeting (when), with patients and family attending this meeting in 2 studies (how). In terms of decision outcomes, 5 out of 7 studies compared the treatment recommendations before and after implementation of the tools, showing a modification of the treatment plan in 3% to 53% of cases. The limited data on patient outcomes suggest positive effects on well-being and fewer complications (3 out of 7 studies). Conclusion: The seven studies identified that integrated information from the three IODM domains into treatment decision-making lacked comprehensive information regarding the strategies, process, timing and individuals involved in implementing the tools. Nevertheless, the few studies that looked at patient outcomes showed promising findings.

Stakeholder-informed positivity thresholds for disease markers and risk scores: a methodological framework and an application in obstructive lung disease.

OBJECTIVES: A positivity threshold is often applied to markers or predicted risks to guide disease management. These thresholds are often decided exclusively by clinical experts despite being sensitive to the preferences of patients and general public as ultimate stakeholders. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We propose an analytical framework for quantifying the net benefit (NB) of an evidence-based positivity threshold based on combining preference-sensitive (eg, how individuals weight benefits and harms of treatment) and preference-agnostic (eg, the magnitude of benefit and the risk of harm) parameters. We propose parsimonious choice experiments to elicit preference-sensitive parameters from stakeholders, and targeted evidence synthesis to quantify the value of preference-agnostic parameters. We apply this framework to maintenance of azithromycin therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using a discrete choice experiment to estimate preference weights for attribute level associated with treatment. We identify the positivity threshold on 12-month moderate or severe exacerbation risk that would maximize the NB of treatment in terms of severe exacerbations avoided. RESULTS: In the case study, the prevention of moderate and severe exacerbations (benefits) and the risk of hearing loss and gastrointestinal symptoms (harms) emerged as important attributes. Four hundred seventy seven respondents completed the discrete choice experiment survey. Relative to each percent risk of severe exacerbation, preference weights for each percent risk of moderate exacerbation, hearing loss, and gastrointestinal symptoms were 0.395 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.338-0.456), 1.180 (95% CI 1.071-1.201), and 0.253 (95% CI 0.207-0.299), respectively. The optimal threshold that maximized NB was to treat patients with a 12-month risk of moderate or severe exacerbations ≥12%. CONCLUSION: The proposed methodology can be applied to many contexts where the objective is to devise positivity thresholds that need to incorporate stakeholder preferences. Applying this framework to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease pharmacotherapy resulted in a stakeholder-informed treatment threshold that was substantially lower than the implicit thresholds in contemporary guidelines. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Doctors often compare disease markers (such as laboratory results) or risk scores for a patient with cut-off values from guidelines to decide which patients need to be treated. For example, guidelines recommend that patients whose 10-year risk of heart attack is more than 10% be given statin pills. However, guidelines that recommend such treatment rules might not consider what matters most to patients (like how much they do not like side effects of the drugs). In this study, we propose a mathematical method where preferences of individuals on the trade-off between treatment benefits and harms can be used to determine the best treatment rule. We apply this method to the choice of antibiotic therapy for patients with lung airway diseases. We find that, given patient and public preferences on treatment benefit and risks, those with a 12% or more risk of experiencing a lung attack should receive antibiotic therapy. This patient-oriented cut-off is significantly lower than the cut-off values currently used by guidelines, which are in the 60%-70% range. We recommend applying this method whenever scientists must make recommendations on treatment rules where patient or public preferences might influence those rules.

Exploring Patient Preferences for Information About CT Radiation Exposure: Bridging the Gap Between Patient Preference and Physician Practice.

Background: CT scan utilizes ionizing radiation poses a danger to the patient's health. Thus, telling the patient about ionizing radiation would be critical in promoting shared decision-making and improving patient-doctor communication. However, few studies have examined this topic broadly. Objective: The study was conducted to identify the frequency of physicians informing patients about the radiation risk before ordering a CT scan, as well as to examine the association between patients' demographic characteristics and their awareness of the radiation risks associated with CT scans. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 387 patients who had undergone CT scans at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Data were collected via phone interviews using a structured questionnaire. Chi-squared tests were employed to assess associations between patients' demographic characteristics and their awareness of CT scan radiation risks. Results: When examining knowledge, 58% of patients knew that CT involves harmful radiation. This knowledge was significantly associated with higher education level and previous experience with CT scans. Regarding doctors' practice of providing information to patients about the scan, 344 (88.9%) patients indicated that their doctor had explained to them why they needed the scan. Only 28 (7.2%) patients stated that their doctor had mentioned the amount of radiation, and 74 (19.1%) patients indicated that doctors mentioned the risks associated with the radiation of the scan. Almost all patients (96.9%) preferred to be told about why they needed a CT scan. Conclusion: The vast majority of patients who underwent CT scans did not receive enough information about the harm of the scans. However, most of them preferred to know about this harm.

Musculoskeletal patients' preferences for care from physiotherapists or support workers: a discrete choice experiment.

BACKGROUND: Delegation of clinical tasks from physiotherapists to physiotherapy support workers is common yet varies considerably in musculoskeletal outpatient physiotherapy services, leading to variation in patient care. This study aimed to explore patients' preferences and estimate specific trade-offs patients are willing to make in treatment choices when treated in musculoskeletal outpatient physiotherapy services. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted using an efficient design with 16 choice scenarios, divided into two blocks. Adult patients with musculoskeletal conditions recruited from a physiotherapy service completed a cross-sectional, online questionnaire. Choice data analyses were conducted using a multinomial logit model. The marginal rate of substitution for waiting time to first follow-up physiotherapy appointment and distance from the physiotherapy clinic was calculated and a probability model was built to estimate the probability of choosing between two distinct physiotherapy service options under different scenarios. RESULTS: 382 patient questionnaires were completed; 302 participants were treated by physiotherapists and 80 by physiotherapists and support workers. There was a significant preference to be seen by a physiotherapist, have more follow-up treatments, to wait less time for the first follow-up appointment, to be seen one-to-one, to see the same clinician, to travel a shorter distance to get to the clinic and to go to clinics with ample parking. Participants treated by support workers did not have a significant preference to be seen by a physiotherapist and it was more likely that they would choose to be seen by a support worker for clinic scenarios where the characteristics of the physiotherapy service were as good or better. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight that patients treated by support workers are likely to choose to be treated by support workers again if the other service characteristics are as good or better compared to a service where treatment is provided only by physiotherapists. Findings have implications for the design of physiotherapy services to enhance patient experience when patients are treated by support workers. The findings will contribute to the development of "best practice" recommendations to guide physiotherapists in delegating clinical work to physiotherapy support workers for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.

Patient Perspectives in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gallstone Disease: A Qualitative Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Gallstone disease is one of the most common surgical diagnoses in the United States. Notably absent from the literature is the patient's perspective on priorities in management. Understanding patient values will assist surgeons and systems in achieving high-quality, patient-focused care for biliary disease. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective or urgent cholecystectomy were invited to participate in a semistructured interview to assess their experience. Interviews were performed over the phone or in person and recordings were transcribed. Each transcription was analyzed independently by two authors using the MAXQDA software, and a mixed deductive-inductive approach was used to develop themes. Anonymized quotes were used to illustrate themes and subthemes regarding the patient's experiences and priorities surrounding gallstone disease. RESULTS: A total of 29 interviews were completed. Most participants were female, but represented a diverse racial and educational group. The most common diagnosis was acute cholecystitis (48%), and 76% of patients underwent an emergency operation. Patients indicated that their main priority regarding treatment was prompt pain control with definitive management so they could return to their previous quality of life. Most patients wanted face-to-face communication with the surgical team both pre and postoperatively. Patients wished they had more information about postoperative care and expectations in the preoperative setting. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' priorities in their care for gallstone disease are centered around definitive management and quality of life. Improvements in communication were identified regarding meeting the surgeon, and postoperative communication. These results can inform surgeons how to prioritize patient perspectives in an acute care surgical system that was not designed with patient input.

Patient preferences for inflammatory bowel disease treatments: protocol development of a global preference survey using a discrete choice experiment.

Background: As the therapeutic landscape for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to expand, a need exists to understand how patients perceive and value different attributes associated with their disease as well as with current and emerging treatments. These insights can inform the development and regulation of effective interventions for IBD, benefiting various stakeholders including healthcare professionals, drug developers, regulators, Health Technology Assessment bodies, payers, and ultimately patients suffering from IBD. In response to this, the present patient preference study was developed with the aim to (1) determine the relative preference weights for IBD treatment and disease related attributes, and (2) explain how preferences may differ across patients with different characteristics (preference heterogeneity). Methods: The patient preference study (PPS) was developed through an 8-step process, with each step being informed by an advisory board. This process included: (1) stated preference method selection, (2) attribute and level development (including a scoping literature review, focus group discussions, and advisory board meetings), (3) choice task construction, (4) sample size estimation, (5) survey implementation, (6) piloting, (7) translation, and (8) pre-testing. The resulting discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey comprises 14 attributes with between two and five varying levels. Participants will answer 15 DCE questions with a partial profile design, where each of the choice questions encompasses two hypothetical treatment profiles showing four attributes. Additionally, questions about patients' socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as contextual factors are implemented. The survey is available in 15 different languages and aims to minimally recruit 700 patients globally. Discussion: This protocol gives valuable insights toward preference researchers and decision-makers on how PPS design can be transparently reported, demonstrating solutions to remaining gaps in preference research. Results of the PPS will provide evidence regarding the disease and treatment related characteristics that are most important for IBD patients, and how these may differ across patients with different characteristics. These findings will yield valuable insights applicable to preference research, drug development, regulatory approval, and reimbursement processes, enabling decision making across the medicinal product life cycle that is aligned with the true needs of IBD patients.

Digitalising Clinical Guidelines: The Challenge of Patient's Preferences.

Will digitalised clinical guidelines be compatible with individualised and personalised patient care if the disease definitions and classifications used within them contain embedded preferences? Taking bone health as a case study, we found the dominant definition of osteoporosis installs the consensus preference judgement of a 1992 International Expert Committee in the form of a threshold cut-off on the bone mineral density continuum. We found that subsequent UK clinical guidelines follow suit on this diagnostic threshold, but also endorse preference-sensitive thresholds for interventions to prevent fractures, including ones underpinned by cost-effectiveness analysis. The resulting pre-emption of patient's preferences needs to be removed if 'computable' guidelines are to be reconcilable with personalised care. The challenges to be met in digitalisation therefore include major conceptual ones as well as the technical ones that are currently the almost exclusive focus.

Views and preferences of food-insecure pregnant women regarding food insecurity screening and support within routine antenatal care.

BACKGROUND: Food insecurity is a public health concern that has profound impact on physical and mental health, and on social well-being. Pregnancy is a period in which food insecurity is likely to be particularly deleterious, due to the serious impact on both mother and child. Food insecurity is not routinely screened in antenatal healthcare settings, and the preferences of pregnant women regarding food insecurity screening and support are poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the views and preferences of food-insecure pregnant women regarding food insecurity screening and support within antenatal healthcare. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study used face-to-face semi-structured interviews, conducted in February and March 2023, to gain the views of purposively sampled food-insecure, pregnant women in Melbourne, Australia. Food insecurity was evidenced by an affirmative response to at least one of three assessment items in a screening questionnaire. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to summarise the views and preferences of women. RESULTS: Nineteen food-insecure pregnant women were interviewed. Three themes were identified: (1) acceptability of being screened for food insecurity, (2) concerns about the consequences of disclosure and (3) preferences regarding food insecurity screening and supportive strategies that could be offered within an antenatal healthcare setting. CONCLUSION: Women were accepting of food insecurity screening being conducted within routine healthcare. Women identified potential benefits of routine screening, such as feeling supported by their clinician to have a healthy pregnancy and less pressure to voluntarily ask for food assistance. Women gave suggestions for the implementation of food insecurity screening to optimise their healthcare experience, maintain their dignity and feel able to disclose within a safe and caring environment. These results indicate that food insecurity screening in the antenatal setting is likely to have support from pregnant women and is urgently needed in the interest of promoting optimal nutrition for women and children. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Pregnant women with lived experience of food insecurity were purposively sampled to obtain their insights regarding screening and support within a pregnancy healthcare setting. Member-checking occurred following data collection, whereby all participants were offered the opportunity to review their interview transcript to ensure trustworthiness of the data.

A Cross-Sectional Study on Patient Preferences for Selecting Surgeons for Joint Replacement Surgery in India.

Introduction This study aims to investigate the complex decision-making process of patients in India when choosing surgeons for joint replacement surgery, with a focus on both clinical and non-clinical factors influencing their preferences. Methods This was a cross-sectional observational study conducted at the KIMS-Sunshine Hospitals, Hyderabad, a high-volume tertiary care institute in India, in which patients with end-stage osteoarthritis requiring primary total knee arthroplasty were evaluated using a self-administered questionnaire, which assessed both patient-related and surgeon-related factors in choosing their joint replacement surgeon. Results A total of 210 participants were surveyed among whom the majority were females with an average age of 60.2 years with the majority belonging to the upper-middle-class socioeconomic status (48.6%, N=102). Fifty-nine percent preferred surgeons with over 20 years of experience, and 63.8% were willing to travel out-of-state for recognized expertise. Family recommendations (33.8%) and surgeon reputation (24.3%) were primary factors in surgeon selection. A vast majority (73.3%) preferred surgeons who were skilled in robotic surgery and had foreign training (32.9%). However, the majority (67.6%) did not express any gender preference. The survey highlighted a broad range of informational sources affecting decisions, including financial consideration (63.8%), personal referrals, and online platforms (17.1%). Preferences were also shaped by hospital reputation and insurance options (10.5%), illustrating a nuanced interplay of quality, cost, and personal connections in the selection process. Conclusion The findings of this survey illuminate the intricate and diverse preferences exhibited by patients when selecting a surgeon for joint replacement surgery. A significant rise in patient expectations is evident, underscoring a demand for more personalized, contemporary, and high-quality healthcare services. Importantly, geographical proximity appears to be a diminishing concern in their decision-making process. This trend presents an opportunity for centers of excellence to extend their influence and attract patients on both a regional and national level.