Invisibilização e preconceitos velados: barreiras para o acesso aos serviços de atenção básica pela população trans / Invisibilization and veiled prejudices: barriers to access to primary care services for the transgender population / Invisibilización y prejuicios velados: barreras para el acceso de la población trans a los servicios de atención primaria

Introdução: No processo de edificação da Política Nacional de Saúde Integral LGBT+, a Atenção Básica ganha importante destaque, pois deveria funcionar como o contato preferencial dos usuários transgênero (trans). Objetivo: Investigar quais as percepções dos profissionais da Atenção Básica quanto às situações de vulnerabilidade enfrentadas pelas pessoas trans, bem como pesquisar os impedimentos que eles consideram existir na busca dessa população por acesso a esses serviços. Métodos: Utilizou-se uma abordagem qualitativa por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas com 38 profissionais de saúde atuantes das Estratégias Saúde da Família de dois municípios do interior do estado de São Paulo. O material obtido foi submetido à análise de conteúdo de Bardin. Resultados: Os resultados apontaram para o desconhecimento quanto aos reais empecilhos que dificultam o acesso e seguimento de pessoas trans nos serviços de saúde. Observou-se ainda a manutenção de preconceitos e ideias que reforçam estereótipos ligados ao tema e que se estendem ao exercício da profissão. Isso se relaciona diretamente com a falta da abordagem de assuntos relacionados à sexualidade humana na graduação desses profissionais, além da falta de atualização quanto ao tema, o que impacta a qualidade do serviço que é ofertado à população em estudo. Conclusões: As normativas e portarias já existentes precisam ser efetivamente postas em prática, fazendo-se imperativas a ampliação e difusão do conhecimento a respeito da temática trans no contexto dos serviços públicos de saúde, o que pode servir como base para subsidiar a formação dos profissionais que atuam nesse setor, bem como políticas públicas efetivas.

Introduction: In the process of creating the National LGBT+ Comprehensive Health Policy, primary care has important prominence as it must work as the preferential contact of transgender (trans) users. Objective: To investigate the perceptions of primary care professionals about the vulnerability situations faced by trans persons and also hindrances they consider existing in this population's search for access to these services. Methods: A qualitative approach was used through semi-structured interviews with 38 health care professionals working in the Family Health Strategy of two cities in the countryside of the state of São Paulo. The material obtained was submitted to analysis of Bardin content. Results: The results pointed to a lack of knowledge about real hindrances that obstruct the access to and follow-up by health services for trans persons. It was also observed the maintenance of prejudices and ideas that reinforce stereotypes connected to the matter and extend to the practice of professionals. It is directly related to the lack of approach of issues related to human sexuality in the education of those professionals, in addition to lack of update about it, which impacts the quality of service offered to the population under study. Conclusions: The standards and ordinances already existing need to be effectively practiced, being crucial the extension and spread of knowledge about trans matters in the context of public health services. It can be the basis for subsidizing the education of professionals who work in this field, as well as effective public policies.

Introducción: En el proceso de edificación de la Política Nacional de Salud Integral LGBT+, la Atención Básica tiene importante destaque, pues debería funcionar como contacto preferente de los usuarios transgénero (trans). Objetivo: Investigar las percepciones de los profesionales de Atención Básica sobre las situaciones de vulnerabilidad que enfrentan las personas trans, así como investigar los impedimentos que consideran que existe en la búsqueda de esta población por el acceso a estos servicios. Métodos: Se utilizó un abordaje cualitativo por medio de entrevistas semiestructuradas con 38 profesionales de salud actuantes de las Estrategias de Salud de la Familia de dos municipios del interior del estado de São Paulo. El material obtenido fue sometido a análisis de contenido de Bardin. Resultados: Los resultados apuntaron al desconocimiento sobre los reales obstáculos que dificultan el acceso de personas trans a los servicios, además del segmento de los cuidados en las unidades. Se observó además que se mantienen los prejuicios e ideas que refuerzan estereotipos vinculados al tema y que se extienden al ejercicio de la profesión. Esto se relaciona directamente a la falta da abordaje de asuntos relacionados a la sexualidad humana en la graduación de estos profesionales, además de la falta de actualización sobre el tema, lo que impacta en la calidad del servicio que se ofrece a la población en estudio. Conclusiones: Las normas y ordenanzas ya existentes deben ser efectivamente puestas en práctica, por lo que es imperativo ampliar y difundir el conocimiento sobre la temática trans en el contexto de los servicios públicos de salud, que pueda servir de base para apoyar la formación de profesionales que actúan en este sector, así como políticas públicas efectivas.

The Effects of an Electronic Medical Record Prompt on Documentation of Firearm Screening in and Adolescent Primary Care Setting.

PURPOSE: There is limited evidence as to how to facilitate health care providers (HCPs) addressing firearm injury prevention during routine visits. The purpose of this project was to examine whether including a screening question about firearms in the home in the routine care template increases the screening of youth access to firearms. METHODS: A pre-post approach chart review was conducted for youth 12-21 years old. Outcomes included HCP documentation of screening for the presence of firearms and whether counseling caregivers on safer storage practices was delivered. RESULTS: HCPs documented screening adolescents for firearms 85% after the addition of the prompt compared to 25% prior to the change (p < .001). The presence of the screening prompt also led to an increase in the delivery of safe storage counseling (p = .035). DISCUSSION: Altering the EMR template increased HCP documentation of the presence of firearms in the home while also increasing firearm injury prevention counseling delivered to caregivers.

Impact of C-reactive protein point-of-care testing on antibiotic prescriptions for children and adults with suspected respiratory tract infections in primary care: a French patient-level randomised controlled superiority trial.

OBJECTIVES: The value of C-reactive protein point-of-care testing (CRP POCT) to guide antibiotic prescriptions in adults has previously been emphasized. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of CRP POCT on antibiotic prescriptions by general practitioners (GPs) for suspected lower respiratory tract infections in children ≥3 years old and in adults. METHODS: This was an open-label randomised trial (NCT03540706) conducted in 26 GPs in France between October 2019 and March 2023. Of the 404 participating patients, 207 (51.2%) were randomised to the CRP POCT group and 197 (48.8%) to the control group (i.e. no CRP POCT). During consultations, GPs measured CRP levels in patients randomised to the CRP POCT group. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in each group prescribed antibiotics by their GP during the consultation. Z-tests were used for comparisons. RESULTS: The overall proportion of patients treated with antibiotics was similar in the CRP POCT (n=89/207, 43% CI[36.2;50.0]) and in the control group (n=94/197, 47.7% CI[40.6;54.9]), difference: -4.7CI[-14.4; 5.0]; p = 0.3. Overall, 75% of the GPs followed CRP-based antibiotic prescription recommendations in the CRP POCT group. CONCLUSION: CRP POCT did not reduce antibiotic prescriptions in this trial.

Which Types of Providers Have Firearm Discussions in a Pediatric Primary Care Clinic?

OBJECTIVE: Safe firearm storage decreases self-inflicted and unintentional firearm injury in youth. Medical providers are well-positioned to discuss safe firearm storage with families. The primary objective of this study was to determine which providers are most likely to discuss firearms with their patients. Our secondary objective was to determine whether providers were more likely to discuss firearms with patients at elevated suicide risk. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of primary care well child visits occurring January-December 2019 in a large, urban academic clinic. We documented provider-type and training level (exposure); any documentation of firearms in the chart (counseling, screening) was considered as having a firearm discussion (outcome). We also collected demographics, patient mental health history, PHQ-9 scores, and assessed suicide risk. RESULTS: Of the 743 charts reviewed, firearms were discussed in 9% (n=66). Medical students were most likely to discuss firearms (15%), attending physicians were least likely (1%, p < 0.001). Providers did not discuss firearms more frequently among youth at elevated suicide risk. CONCLUSION: Though providers do not frequently discuss and document firearm discussions overall, the higher rates among medical students is promising. Given the lethality of firearms in a suicide attempt, the lack of firearm safety discussions with those at elevated suicide risk was concerning. Further study should evaluate factors that facilitate discussions in this cohort and identify strategies to improve counseling among more senior providers. WHAT'S NEW: Pediatric providers have an opportunity to counsel families about the risk of firearm access. We found that trainees are most likely to counsel families about firearms, and that providers are not more likely to counsel youth at elevated suicide risk.

Calcium Disorders.

This article provides a comprehensive overview of calcium physiology, clinical presentation with physical examination findings, laboratory assessment, differential diagnosis, and management of hypocalcemia and hypercalcemia for the primary care provider.

Gender Disparities in Adverse Events Resulting From Low-Value Practices in Family Practice in Spain: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate gender-based disparities in preventable adverse events due to low-value practices (LVPs) in primary care. Methods: A retrospective cohort study in Alicante, Spain. Results: A total of 1,516 patient records were examined, finding that older individuals and women experienced more LVP-related events. Female patients faced a higher volume of such events than males with the same health issue. Interaction analysis revealed patients treated by male physicians had more severe events, while those attended by females experienced milder ones. Adverse events were more frequent in LVPs associated with gender-based reasons. Conclusion: These results highlight the need for tailored healthcare professional awareness programs on overuse's impact on safety. Addressing outcome differences between male and female patients should inform awareness campaigns.

Which pediatric practices use substance use consultation services?

Substance use disorders (SUD) are common in adolescents and young adults, though few youth with SUD receive treatment, and rates of medication for substance use disorder treatment are much lower in youth compared to adults. Pediatric primary care could present an opportunity for youth with SUD to access medication, though pediatric providers may need support. Massachusetts has provided a substance use consultation line for pediatric providers since 2018. One large network of independent primary care practices within the state has been further supported by access to resources provided through a grant from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. In this paper, we describe the services provided in Massachusetts and examine whether additional resources are associated with increased use of the consultation line as a marker of provider engagement in SUD treatment.

Increasing interprofessional collaboration in community-based palliative care: a pilot study of the CAPACITI education program for primary care providers.

Interprofessional collaboration in palliative care is essential to ensuring high-quality care for seriously ill patients. Education interventions to increase competency in palliative care should incorporate team-building skills to encourage an interprofessional approach. We developed and piloted a virtual educational program named CAPACITI for interprofessional teams to promote a community palliative approach to care. Primary care teams from across Ontario, Canada, participated in CAPACITI which consisted of 10 facilitated sessions that emphasized how to operationalize a palliative care approach as a team. Pre- and post-study questionnaires were completed by each team, including the AITCS-II, a validated instrument that measures interprofessional collaboration. We analyzed individual paired differences in summary scores and in each of three subdomains of the AITCS-II questionnaire: partnership, cooperation, and coordination. Seventeen teams completed the AITCS-II post survey, representing 133 participants. Teams varied demographically and ranged from 5 to 16 members. After CAPACITI, the overall mean AITCS-II summary score among teams increased to 96.0 (SD = 10.0) for a significant paired mean difference increase of 9.4 (p = .03). There were also significant increases in the partnership (p = .01) and in the cooperation subdomains (p = .04). CAPACITI demonstrated the potential for improving collaboration among primary care teams, which can lead to improved provider and patient outcomes in palliative care.

Recommendations for postpartum athletes returning to sport: the past, present, and future.

INTRODUCTION: There is a growing percentage of elite female athletes who choose to start a family during their athletic careers. Current guidelines to manage postpartum elite athletes returning to sport are weakly rooted in athlete-centered evidence and/or are restricted by small sample sizes. The purpose of this review was to collect and compare existing protocols and guidelines for elite athletes returning to sport following childbirth and to highlight the current culture surrounding postpartum athletes. METHODS: Online databases including PubMed and BioMed Central were searched from September 2023 to May 2024. Studies of any design were included if they contained information on pregnancy and postpartum. Peer-reviewed research studies, systematic reviews, case reports, and data from organizational websites (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the World Health Organization, and the Official Olympics) were included. RESULTS: Athlete-mothers face numerous challenges in their transition back to competitive sport following childbirth, including the societal expectations of a 'good' mother, potential loss of financial sponsorships, and limited guidance on postpartum training. Additionally, the healthcare community historically managed postpartum athletes in a reactionary manner by treating symptoms from pregnancy and childbirth as they arise. Recent literature is pointing toward adopting a preventive and proactive model of care to optimize an athlete's health prior to pregnancy and therefore support their safe return to sport postpartum. CONCLUSION: Increased support for female participation in sports must also be met by increased support for pregnant and postpartum athletes. There is a continued need for research regarding return-to-sport guidelines for postpartum athletes, and their proper implementation.

Integrated Service Delivery Model in Primary Care to Improve Frailty in Older Malaysians: GeKo Integrated Service Delivery.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the implementation stage of Malaysia's GeKo-Integrated Service Delivery (ISD) model for frailty management in primary care and explore its effectiveness in improving frailty scores. METHODS: The implementation stage of Malaysia's first three GeKo- ISD clinics was assessed using the WHO-ICOPE (Integrated Care of the Older Persons) scorecard. This involved evaluating documents related to the GeKo services and conducting in-depth interviews with key informants identified from those documents. The efficacy of GeKo-ISD was assessed by documenting the change in mean frailty scores between baseline and 3 months post intervention, measured by the Pictorial Fit Frail Scale Malay Version (PFFS-M), in patients who received GeKo-ISD care from October 2022 to April 2023. RESULTS: All three GeKo clinics achieved the sustaining implementation level, scoring a total of 50 out of 52. The paired t-test reported a significant reduction (p= 0.001) in the PFFS-M scores from baseline to 3 months after the GeKo-ISD intervention. The mean (SD) scores were 8.6 (4.6) at baseline and 7.0 (4.1) at 3 months post-intervention. CONCLUSION: GeKo-ISD is a comprehensive approach of integrated care for older people, leveraging existing public funded primary care infrastructure. It shows promise, was impacted by the pandemic but now, with support from the government, exists in 32 centers across one state in Malaysia.

Multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer in France: The SINPATIC qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Health policymakers have tried to improve the care pathway for cancer patients by improving collaboration between participating healthcare professionals by involving the general practitioner (GP). OBJECTIVE(S): To explore how patients, GPs, oncologists and nurses interacted and how they perceived, in their practice, professional roles, collaboration, and cancer care pathways. METHODS: Between January 2018 and December 2021, we conducted a qualitative study that combined phenomenology and a general inductive analysis, based on semi-structured interviews with cancer patients and their GPs, oncologists, and nurses in France. RESULTS: Our analysis of 59 interviews showed that the stakeholders had different perceptions of the cancer care pathway. Task division was implicit and depended on what each health professional thought he/she should be doing; this led to the blurring of certain tasks (announcement of the diagnosis, coordination, and follow-up). The healthcare professionals were stuck in frameworks centred on their own needs and expectations and were unaware of the other health professionals' needs and expectations. Outside the hospital, GPs and nurses worked in isolation; they were not aware of the other stakeholders and did not communicate with them. GPs and nurses justified this attitude by the lack of a perceived need. Interprofessional communication varied as a function of the needs, involvement and knowledge of the other health professionals and was often mediated by the patient. CONCLUSION: In the cancer management in France, to improve cancer care pathway, there is a need to train healthcare professionals in interprofessional collaboration delivering care tailored to patient needs and preferences.

In the management of patients with cancer, the division of tasks between health professionals was not clear and was not discussed by the group.Communication within the health professionals was mediated often by the patient.Interprofessional collaboration is strongly encouraged by France's public health policies but was not mentioned or put into practice by the health professionals.

"A day in the life" - telemedicine in family medicine and its relationship with practicing physicians' satisfaction: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has expanded rapidly in recent years, and many encounters that were conducted in person now take place remotely. This study aimed to assess primary care physicians' (PCPs) attitudes towards the different modalities of patient care. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional nationwide descriptive study conducted in Israel. We asked PCPs to document an entire workday and answer a short questionnaire after each visit. The questions addressed the type of visit (face-to-face, remote synchronous [telephone/video], or remote asynchronous [online requests]), the perceived quality of the visit, and the physicians' feelings at the end of each visit. Before documenting their working day, we asked the participants to answer a questionnaire about their general attitudes toward different modalities of medical visits and how they affect their well-being and burnout. RESULTS: Sixty physicians documented 2,025 visits, of which 39% took place in person, 36% stemmed from online patient requests, 18% were telephone meetings, < 1% were video meetings, and 6% consisted of other types of contact. Mixed effects logistic regressions were used to model the visits' evaluation. The odds ratios (ORs) for perceived medical quality of visits focused on medical tasks were lower for non-face-to-face visits: OR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.59 for remote synchronous, and OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.09-0.23 for remote asynchronous. The perceived medical quality of visits focused on administrative tasks was lower for remote asynchronous than for face-to-face visits (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.65). We found no association between medical quality and patients, physicians, or clinic characteristics. The inappropriateness of the visit modality was also associated with lower medical quality (OR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.09-0.18). We found a correlation between perception of medical quality and physicians' feelings at the end of the visits, Spearman's r = 0.82 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial portion of the visits was dedicated to administrative tasks and remote medicine. In comparison, physicians rated face-to-face visits' quality higher than remote visits. Policymakers should intervene to minimize administrative work, reduce PCPs' administrative workload, and direct patients to the optimal visit modality for their complaints. These steps would increase medical quality, reduce burnout, and mitigate the shortage of PCPs.

Validity of the Chinese multimorbidity-weighted index in measuring disease burden using health check-ups data in primary care.

BACKGROUND: As multimorbidity becomes common that imposes a considerable burden to patients, but the extent to which widely-used multimorbidity indexes can be applied to quantify disease burden using primary care data in China is not clear. We applied the Chinese Multimorbidity-Weighted Index (CMWI) to health check-ups data routinely collected among older adults by primary care, to examine its validity in measuring multimorbidity associated risks of disability and mortality in annual follow-ups. METHODS: The study utilized data from annual health check-ups of older adults, which included information on individual age, sex, and 14 health conditions at primary care in a district of Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. The risk of CMWI for mortality was analysed in a total sample of 45,009 persons 65 years and older between 2014 and 2020 (average 2.70-year follow-up), and the risk for disability was in a subsample of 18,320 older adults free of physical impairment in 2019 and followed-up in 2020. Risk of death and disability were assessed with Cox proportional hazard regression and binary logistic regression, respectively, with both models adjusted for age and sex variables. The model fit was assessed by the Akaike information criterion (AIC), and C-statistic or the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: One unit increase in baseline-CMWI (Median= 1.70, IQR: 1.30-3.00) was associated with higher risk in subsequent disability (OR = 1.12, 95%CI = 1.05,1.20) and mortality (OR = 1.18, 95%CI = 1.14, 1.22). Participants in the top tertile of CMWI had 99% and 152% increased risks of disability and mortality than their counterparts in the bottom tertile. Model fit was satisfied with adequate AUC (0.84) or C-statistic (0.76) for both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: CMWI, calculated based on primary care's routine health check-ups data, provides valid estimates of disability and mortality risks in older adults. This validated tool can be used to quantity and monitor older patients' health risks in primary care.

Implementation of a Multifaceted Program to Improve the Rational Use of Antibiotics in Children under 3 Years of Age in Primary Care.

A multifaceted, participatory, open program based on a qualitative and quantitative approach was developed in the Region of Murcia (Spain) aimed to reduce antibiotic use in children under 3 years of age diagnosed with upper respiratory tract infections (acute otitis media, pharyngitis, and common cold). Antibiotic consumption was measured using the defined daily dose per 1000 inhabitants per day (DHD). Pre-intervention data showed a prevalence of antibiotic prescriptions in the primary care setting of 45.7% and a DHD of 19.05. In 2019, after the first year of implementation of the program, antibiotic consumption was 10.25 DHD with an overall decrease of 48% as compared with 2015. Although antibiotic consumption decreased in all health areas, there was a large variability in the magnitude of decreases across health areas (e.g., 12.97 vs. 4.77 DHD). The intervention program was effective in reducing the use of antibiotics in children under 3 years of age with common upper respiratory diseases, but reductions in antibiotic consumption were not consistent among all health areas involved.

Evaluating equity in a national virtual care management intervention: Delivery and outcomes by race/ethnicity among Veterans with hypertension and diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the Preventive Health Inventory (PHI)-a virtual care management intervention addressing hypertension and diabetes management implemented nationally in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA)-was delivered equitably among racial/ethnic groups and if existing inequities in hypertension and diabetes outcomes changed following PHI receipt. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: We used data from the VHA Corporate Data Warehouse among Veterans enrolled in primary care nationally from February 28, 2021 to March 31, 2022. STUDY DESIGN: We used logistic regression to evaluate PHI receipt and hypertension and diabetes outcomes after PHI implementation among Veterans with hypertension and/or diabetes. We conducted unadjusted analyses and analyses adjusting for clinic fixed effects using dummy variables. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We identified Veterans engaged in primary care with documented race/ethnicity and hypertension and/or diabetes diagnoses in all months during the study period. PRINCIPLE FINDINGS: Prior to PHI, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) (42.2%) and Hispanic (39.5%) Veterans were less likely to have controlled hypertension vs. Non-Hispanic White (NHW) Veterans (47.5%); NHB Veterans (32.9%) were more likely to have uncontrolled diabetes vs. NHW Veterans (25.1%). Among 1,805,658 Veterans, 5.7% NHW (N = 68,744), 5.6% NHB (N = 22,580), 10.2% Hispanic (N = 13,313), 6.2% Asian/Pacific Islander/Native Hawaiian (N = 1868), 5.1% American Indian/Native Alaskan (N = 744), and 5.6% multiple races or other race (N = 1647) Veterans received PHI. We found no significant racial inequities in PHI receipt in unadjusted and adjusted models. Hypertension and diabetes measures improved more in the intervention group compared with the group who did not receive the intervention. There were no new or worsened inequities after PHI, and in pre-/post-intervention analysis, among NHB Veterans, the inequity in uncontrolled diabetes improved by 1.9 percentage points (95% CI 0.2, 3.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest the PHI intervention was equitably deployed across race/ethnicity groups without significantly impacting most existing inequities in diabetes and hypertension.

Food Consumption Inequalities in Primary Care in a Large Metropolis.

The aim of this study was to examine the association between health vulnerability and food consumption according to the NOVA classification within primary care in a major Brazilian city. A cross-sectional study was conducted among adults over 20 years old. These participants were part of a representative sample from the Health Academy Program (PAS) in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. We evaluated socio-demographic variables, self-reported illnesses, perceived health and quality of life, and the length of participation in PAS. Health vulnerability was gauged through the Health Vulnerability Index (HVI), which is calculated for each census sector and classified as low, medium, and high/very high. On the other hand, food consumption was determined by evaluating the average consumption described in a 24 h diet recall (24HR) and categorizing it under the NOVA classification: culinary preparations, processed foods, and ultra-processed foods (UPFs). The average calorie intake was 1429.7 kcal, primarily from culinary preparations (61.6%) and UPFs (27.4%). After adjustments, individuals residing in high/very high-HVI areas consumed more culinary preparations (ß = 2.7; 95%CI: 4.7; 0.7) and fewer UPFs (ß = -2.7; 95%CI: -4.7; -0.7) compared to those from low-vulnerability areas. PAS participants residing in more vulnerable areas reported healthier dietary habits, consuming more homecooked meals and fewer UPFs. These findings underscore the importance of concentrating efforts on promoting and preserving healthy eating habits and emphasizing the value of home cooking in the most vulnerable regions.

Defining a screening tool for post-traumatic stress disorder in East Africa: a penalized regression approach.

Background: Scalable PTSD screening strategies must be brief, accurate and capable of administration by a non-specialized workforce. Methods: We used PTSD as determined by the structured clinical interview as our gold standard and considered predictors sets of (a) Posttraumatic Stress Checklist-5 (PCL-5), (b) Primary Care PTSD Screen for the DSM-5 (PC-PTSD) and, (c) PCL-5 and PC-PTSD questions to identify the optimal items for PTSD screening for public sector settings in Kenya. A logistic regression model using LASSO was fit by minimizing the average squared error in the validation data. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) measured discrimination performance. Results: Penalized regression analysis suggested a screening tool that sums the Likert scale values of two PCL-5 questions-intrusive thoughts of the stressful experience (#1) and insomnia (#21). This had an AUROC of 0.85 (using hold-out test data) for predicting PTSD as evaluated by the MINI, which outperformed the PC-PTSD. The AUROC was similar in subgroups defined by age, sex, and number of categories of trauma experienced (all AUROCs>0.83) except those with no trauma history- AUROC was 0.78. Conclusion: In some East African settings, a 2-item PTSD screening tool may outperform longer screeners and is easily scaled by a non-specialist workforce.

Evaluation of the Implementation of Integrated Primary Care for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension in Belgium, Cambodia, and Slovenia.

Introduction: Integrated care of chronic patients improves quality of their management, but there is scarce evidence of its implementation in different healthcare settings. With this article, we wanted to determine the level of integrated care implementation in the management of T2D (diabetes) and HT (hypertension) in three different settings: Belgium, Slovenia, and Cambodia. Methods: This was an observational study with integrated approach. It was conducted in primary health care organisations in three countries. In each primary health care organisation, we aimed to include primary care workers that worked with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) and hypertension (HT) patients. Data was collected with the Integrated Care Package (ICP) grid (consisting of six elements: identification, treatment, health education, self-management, caregiver collaboration, and care organisation). Results: ICP is almost completely implemented without major differences within Slovenia. There is a considerable variability across practice types in Belgium. Implementation is constrained by health system resources in Cambodia. Some elements, especially identification, are better implemented then others, across health systems. Conclusion: Countries can enhance integrated care for chronic diseases by implementing central policies, standardized protocols, and local adaptation, addressing resource constraints, promoting systematic screening and health education, and providing training for healthcare workers, tailored to community needs, to improve patient outcomes and healthcare delivery.

The role of primary care in rare disorders: A qualitative study of parents and patients managing complex vascular anomalies.

Background: Patients with complex rare disorders often require the care of multiple specialists. Effective coordination between primary and specialty care is needed to ensure patients receive high-quality care. Previous research has documented the importance of primary care clinicians providing referrals to specialty care and the importance of specialists in helping patients reach a diagnosis. However, little is known about primary care clinicians' roles in the ongoing care of patients with rare disorders. In the current study, we explored the role of primary care clinicians in the care of rare and complex vascular anomalies. Materials and Methods: Data were collected using semi-structured qualitative interviews with 34 parents and 25 adult patients recruited from advocacy groups for patients with complex vascular anomalies participated. We asked participants about their diagnosis, care experiences, and communication with clinicians. We used thematic analysis to identify themes illustrating the roles of primary care clinicians. Results: PCC roles were characterized by four behaviors. Supporting behaviors included learning more about vascular anomalies and asking participants about the care they received from specialists. Facilitating included providing referrals, ordering tests, and engaging in problem-solving. Interfering included failing to provide referrals or help participants coordinate care, ordering incorrect tests, or making inappropriate recommendations. Disregarding included focusing narrowly on primary care needs and not showing concern about the vascular anomaly. Conclusions: The results reveal opportunities to improve primary care for patients with vascular anomalies. Disregarding and interfering behaviors furthered the division between primary and specialty care for patients with vascular anomalies and prevented patients from receiving comprehensive primary care. Supporting and facilitating behaviors convey genuine interest in the care of the vascular anomaly and a commitment to helping the patient and parent.