Pathway to cardiothoracic surgery: A primer for aspiring students.

Objective: The pathway to cardiothoracic surgery is often obscure for premedical students and aspiring applicants and requires navigating various known and unknown obstacles. Recognizing the challenges encountered on the path to a career in cardiothoracic surgery in the United States, we present this guide for students interested in the field to maximize success in their premedical, preclinical, and preresidency years. Methods: This is a joint collaboration between the Thoracic Surgery Residents Association and the Thoracic Surgery Medical Student Association. Drawing from firsthand experiences and insights gathered from numerous student applicants and current surgical residents, a comprehensive guide was constructed for students from the point of undergraduate school to advanced training options, including super-fellowship training. Results: Several intricacies to cardiothoracic surgery career planning were discussed, including differences between traditional and integrated/fast-track pathways, college and medical school selection, networking, performing during clinical rotations, extracurricular and research activities, building mentorship relationships, and pursuing alternate career and advanced training opportunities. Conclusions: For premedical students and aspiring applicants, the road to cardiothoracic surgery requires meticulous planning, grit, and thoughtful dedication. This document consolidates firsthand insights and advice from numerous aspiring and matched applicants to serve as a comprehensive guide for students seeking a career in cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

Cross sectional survey of Ob/Gyn residents' graduated experience with robotic surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Ob/Gyn resident experience with robotic gynecologic surgery has been evaluated at time of graduation, but no specific surgical procedures were identified to differentiate the experiences of residents at each level. This study proposes to determine which factors are correlated with more hands-on robotic surgery experience and resident satisfaction. DESIGN: An IRB-approved, 15-question survey was distributed electronically. 98 responses were received for a rate of 44%. Linear regression and ANOVA statistical analysis were performed. SETTING: Current residents at eight Ob/gyn residency programs in the US were surveyed. PATIENTS: N/A INTERVENTIONS: Survey administration MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The majority of respondents were satisfied (48%) or had neutral feelings (20%) with regard to their robotic surgery experience. All respondents reported experience with uterine manipulation or bedside assisting by PGY2. Earliest experience performing hysterectomy was most common in PGY2 or PGY3. Seventy-six percent of PGY3 or PGY4 residents report operating on the console for some or all major robotic surgeries, with 69% having participated in greater than 20 robotic surgery cases during residency. Only exposure to MIGS faculty is significantly associated with high robotic surgery experience (p=.022). Overall satisfaction with robotic surgery experience increased significantly with higher level of participation (p<.0001), particularly operating at the console during some or most of the surgery; longitudinal experiences with hysterectomy, myomectomy, and salpingectomy/oophorectomy (p<.05); but not with solely bedside assisting or vaginal cuff closure. Factors limiting robotic console experience included case time constraints, lack of first assists, case complexity, and attending comfort. CONCLUSIONS: Ob/Gyn resident satisfaction with training is significantly related to level and duration of robotic surgery participation. MIGS faculty contribute to more resident experience, and limiting factors include time constraints, case complexity and lack of first assists. These results can provide a framework for structuring resident training in robotic surgery.

Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Geographic Match Location Patterns: Comparison of Pre and Post Virtual Interviews.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of virtual interviews on geographic trends for applicants and programs in the obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) resident match. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of a random 50% sample of all OBGYN residency programs listed by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) for the 2023 to 2024 academic year. Data collected from each program included geographic location, number of residents per year, and total number of residents. Residents were categorized into 4 mutually exclusive geographic match categories: matched into the same institution, matched into same state (but different institution), matched into the same US Census region but a different state/institution, or matched into a different US Census region. RESULTS: A total of 148 of 295 (50.2%) residency programs were included (known total number of residents = 2,928 from four US census regions and Puerto Rico). Most programs were considered small (≤16 residents; n = 52, 35.1%). In general, 43.9% (1148 of 2617) residents matched in a different region from their medical school training. For the primary outcome, no differences in the geographic placement in the previrtual (2020) and virtual application cycles (2021-2023) were observed (p = 0.51). When analyzed by program size or program region, there was no difference in the geographic placement in the previrtual and virtual application cycles. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the virtual interview process did not demonstrate an impact on geographical placement of OBGYN residents, regardless of the size of the residency program or the program's geographic region.

General Surgery Residency Applicant Perspectives on Alternative Residency Interview Models with Implementation of an Optional Second Look Day.

OBJECTIVE: In response to Covid-19, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) recommended for residency interviews to take place virtually. Benefits of virtual interviews include substantial cost saving and scheduling flexibility. However, it is more difficult to understand program culture and there is concern that more emphasis will be placed on board examination scores and class rank. Programs are split in their decision to keep virtual interviews in the future. This study aims to provide more clarification on students' perspectives and explore the role of an optional second look day to bridge the gap left by the lack of in-person interaction. DESIGN: This cross-sectional study surveyed applicants at our general surgery residency program during the 2022 to 2023 cycle. An optional second look day event was held after submission of the program's rank list. The first survey was sent to all applicants who interviewed with the residency program and asked to pick an interview style that they favored (in person vs virtual) and then asked to rate factors that impacted their decision. It also asked if an optional second look day event was made available, what factors would applicants consider to be important in their decision to attend. The second survey was sent to applicants who attended second look day and asked applicants to state importance of factors that led to their decision to attend. RESULTS: About 50/110 completed the first survey. Applicants preferred virtual over in-person interviews (52% vs 28%). Those who chose virtual selected factors of time commitment and financial burden to be very important compared to those who chose in-person. Applicants who preferred in-person interviews placed most importance on avoiding technical issues and having personal interactions such as: with attending surgeons, with residents, assessment of program culture, visiting facilities, and visiting the town. Applicants were asked to pick important factors if they were to attend an optional second look day after their virtual interview. The following factors were chosen as very important: time commitment, financial burden, interaction with program leadership, interaction with attending surgeons, interaction with residents, visiting facilities, and visiting the town. We then held a second look event after the submission of our rank list. 34/110 attended and 17 complete the survey. Cost and time commitment were not as important to this group who actually attended; they chose in-person interactions with leadership and residents and assessing the program culture to be most important. CONCLUSION: This study aimed to determine the best interview method based on student perceptions. We also piloted an optional second look day to determine whether or not it fills the gaps left by the suspension of in-person interviews. We recommend continuing with virtual interviews as this is what applicants prefer. It alleviates the financial burden of travel and allows for better time management. However, the significance of in-person interactions cannot be ignored. We propose that second look days should be incorporated after submission of the program's rank list to allow applicants the opportunity for in-person interactions, exploration of the town, and enhance their overall interviewing experience.

Evolving Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine fellowship application process: a program director survey.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most Regional Anesthesiology and Acute Pain Medicine (RAAPM) fellowship programs transitioned to virtual interviews in 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Then, the RAAPM fellowship match started in 2023 in order to make the application process more equitable. In this study, we surveyed RAAPM fellowship program directors (PDs) to determine how such major events of the early 2020s shaped the fellowship application process. METHODS: A 16-question survey was distributed to US RAAPM program directors. The survey aimed to assess whether PDs prefer the fellowship match over the previous rolling application format and to gauge PDs' confidence in using virtual interviews to evaluate applicants. RESULTS: 56 (71%) RAAPM program directors completed the survey. 79% of respondents participated in the inaugural match. 59% of PDs preferred the fellowship match over the rolling application format. The interview was rated the most important selection criterion. Of the 93% of PDs who switched to virtual interviews during the pandemic, only 4 PDs (7%) resumed in-person interviews in some capacity. Majority of PDs believed that virtual interviews were not inferior to in-person interviews for assessing applicants; 48% of respondents preferred virtual interviews over in-person interviews. CONCLUSIONS: Most RAAPM programs continued to conduct virtual interviews exclusively. Majority of program directors preferred the fellowship match. PDs ranked the interview as the most important selection factor. Most PDs thought virtual interviews were not inferior to in-person interviews, but they remained divided on which format they prefer.

Fellow perceptions of robotic surgery preparedness for fellowship.

INTRODUCTION: Many surgical fellowship programs incorporate robotic surgery, yet not all residency programs offer robotic training for residents. Given the variability of pre-fellowship robotic exposure, the goal of this study was to explore whether standardized robotic skills assessment would be useful to fellows at the start of their training. METHODS: In partnership with the Fellowship Council, we surveyed current fellows of accredited Thoracic, Colorectal, HPB, and Advanced GI/MIS/Bariatrics/Foregut Fellowship programs. Main outcome measurements included amount of robotic exposure during residency, fellows' robotic skills at the start of fellowship, and fellows' attitudes towards a standardized skills assessment. RESULTS: In total, 78 fellows completed the survey. Mean percentage of cases performed robotically during fellowship was 38.1% (SD ± 32.25%). From our respondents, 46% had no robotic curriculum during residency and 86.9% felt a standardized robotic curriculum during residency would have been beneficial. When asked if they started fellowship with adequate robotic skills to operate autonomously, 31% strongly agreed, but 24.4% strongly disagreed. The majority of fellows reported their fellowship program did not conduct an assessment of their robotic skills (71.5%), or provide a specific robotic curriculum (75.6%). On the other hand, 73.3% felt a formal proficiency assessment at the start of fellowship would be helpful for individualized support and training. CONCLUSIONS: Given the significant variability in resident exposure to robotic surgery, a standardized robotic curriculum during residency would likely be beneficial. Additionally, a robotic skills assessment at the start of fellowship could help provide a tailored training experience for fellows interested in this skillset.

How Do I Match? A Survey Study on the Impact of Step 1 Becoming Pass/Fail.

BACKGROUND: Step 1 has historically been a major criterion to evaluate students for residency match. With Step 1 now being pass/fail (P/F), students are uncertain how to distinguish their applications. We aim to understand student's opinions surrounding the scoring change as this is the first class of students applying to residency in the P/F era. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to 3rd and 4th year American medical students. RESULTS: Of the 255 students surveyed, 61.6% prefer Step 1 in the P/F format. Students applying for highly competitive specialties (HCS) preferred numerical scoring (55.6%). On a 5-point Likert scale, students entering HCS believed more strongly that they would have a better chance at matching if Step 1 was graded numerically (3.47 vs 2.71) and creates an unfair advantage for those who can afford to pursue a research year (3.46 vs 2.95). Students entering HCS felt finances played a significant role in whether they took a research year and felt added pressure to engage in research. Respondents believe that students from prestigious medical schools, well-connected students, and MD students will benefit most. CONCLUSIONS: While students mostly prefer P/F scoring, there were differences of opinion between those going into HCS and LCS. Students indicated that those who have financial means are at a distinct advantage as they can afford to utilize a research year to distinguish their applications. Future efforts should be made to address student concerns and unintended consequences of the scoring change to create an equitable system.

The Impact of Signaling in Diagnostic Radiology Residency.

Signaling in the US Residency MATCH process allows medical students to indicate preference for specific programs. In diagnostic radiology, "Gold" and "Silver" signals significantly increase the chances of securing interviews from targeted programs. Specialty advisors should strategically evaluate applicant competitiveness and program desirability to optimize signal placement. METHODS: This study included fourth-year medical students and US or Canadian medical school graduates applying for the 2024 Match. Participants completed a survey on signaling use, interview invitations, and the resources and advice received. RESULTS: Interview invitations for programs with gold, silver, and non-signaled programs were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and generalized estimating equation models. CONCLUSION: Signaling significantly increases the likelihood of receiving interviews in diagnostic radiology, emphasizing the importance of strategic signal placement. Further research is needed to assess its overall impact on the MATCH process.

Post Night Shift Education for Interns: A Pilot Program.

BACKGROUND: Night float rotations are associated with decreased feedback, educational conference attendance, and operative time. Interns are also more isolated and spend less time on teams. We therefore developed a novel post night shift initiative to address these shortcomings and examined its impact on the educational experience and sense of belonging among interns. METHODS: A program of weekly senior resident-led post night shift sessions was instituted at a university-based general surgery residency program for the first quarter of the academic year. Four interns and one senior resident participated in each session. Feedback surveys were administered. A previously validated Belonging in Surgery survey was also administered to all general surgery interns at the end of the quarter. RESULTS: Eleven interns had night float rotations within the first 3 months of the academic year. The intern feedback survey response rate was 93% (10/11). All intern respondents attended at least 3 sessions. Interns felt that the sessions increased familiarity with each other (85%) and senior residents (92%), improved clinical decision making (77%), and provided a safe space for discussion (69%). The senior resident survey response rate was 86% (n = 14). All senior residents enjoyed teaching the sessions and felt that they improved their familiarity with interns. The intern belonging survey response rate was 84% (16/19). Categorical interns had significantly higher belonging scores than preliminary interns at the end of the first quarter (mean 48.1 vs 41.6, p = 0.009). There was a trend toward decreased belonging scores for interns who had night float rotations early in the year which did not meet statistical significance (42.9 vs 47.4, p = 0.059). CONCLUSION: This novel program improved intern decision-making, familiarity with other residents, and comfort calling senior residents for assistance overnight. There was no statistically significant difference in belonging between interns who started residency on night float versus those who did not. Similar programs may help address concerns regarding missed learning opportunities and decreased sense of community during these rotations.

Military Medical Student Specialty Preferences During the DHA Transition: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Military Health System is a unique subsector within the nation's Graduate Medical Education (GME), with a different incentive structure for specialty selection for military medical students compared with their civilian counterparts. Changes by the Defense Health Agency (DHA) in 2017 emphasized a shift in military GME to training "operational" medical specialties. This study sought to gain insight into military medical students' reactions to the 2017 DHA transition by examining whether students continued to select "operational" specialties at similar rates as well as whether students remained satisfied with attending medical school. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of Uniformed Services University (USU) post-match students from 2015 to 2020 using anonymized data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Graduation Questionnaire, separated into pre-DHA (2015-2017) and post-DHA (2018-2020) transition groups. RESULTS: Regarding both intent to practice an operational specialty and satisfaction with choosing medical school, there was no statistically significant difference between the preand post-DHA transition groups. CONCLUSIONS: Whether preor post-DHA transition, USU medical students demonstrated similar preferences for operational specialties as well as similar levels of satisfaction with medical school attendance, suggesting that this transition may not significantly influence medical students' career preferences nor blunt their desire to enter military medicine.

Assessment of the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Orthopaedic Surgery Training Among Orthopaedic Residents in Southern Nigeria.

Background: Surgical training is hands-on, with residents requiring optimal exposure to patients for optimal training and adequate experience. Thus, despite the increased usage of virtual, non-physical resources for medical education during the pandemic, orthopaedic surgical training still suffered adversely. Objectives: To explore the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Orthopaedic surgery training, teaching and practice amongst residents in southern Nigeria. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional prospective study involving 54 senior orthopaedic surgery residents in southern Nigeria. Data were collected using a semi-structured online-based questionnaire created on the Google Forms and sent via online platforms (e.g., WhatsApp and Telegram). Descriptive and inferential analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Consent was also obtained from all respondents. Results: A total of 54 orthopaedic surgery residents responded to our questionnaire. About 71.7% of the residents surveyed reported reduced exposure to surgical cases in general, and 70.3% reported reduced operative teaching exposure. About 68.5% of the respondents reported reduced opportunities for surgical skills acquisition training. More than half of respondents (63%) reported no changes in morbidity/mortality of orthopaedic cases witnessed and performed. The majority of the respondents agreed to a slight decrease in the availability of implants and courses (40.7%) whereas 44.4% affirmed an increase in the cost of training. Overall, 70.4% believed that the impact of COVID-19 on orthopaedic surgical training has been slightly negative. The average rating for experience on alternative learning methods - virtual video conferences, pre-recorded lectures, in-person small group meetings and surgical simulation activities was 2.26 on a scale of 1-4 (decreasing order of satisfaction). Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant changes in orthopaedic surgery training, with low cases exposure and reduction in operative teaching being the most significant changes and the resultant increase in alternative forms of training and skill acquisition.

Characteristics Associated with Successful Residency Match in General Surgery.

Objective: To evaluate characteristics of matched and unmatched general surgery residency (GSR) applicants. Background: Given the recent change of the United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1 grading to pass/fail, understanding the factors that influence GSR match success is integral to identifying potential interventions to improve match rates for diverse medical students. Methods: Retrospective review of GSR National Residency Matching Program (NRMP) applicant and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) active resident data between 2011 and 2022. Data included application characteristics for United States ("US") and "independent" applicants, factors cited by program directors in the interview and ranking process, paths pursued if applicants went unmatched, and racial/ethnic representation. Results: A total of 9149 US and 3985 independent applicants applied to GSR between 2011 and 2021. Matched versus unmatched applicants had higher step 1 scores (US: 236 vs 218, P = 0.005; independent: 237 vs 228, P = 0.001), higher step 2 scores (US: 248 vs 232, P = 0.006; independent: 245 vs 234, P < 0.001), more likely to belong to alpha omega alpha (US: 17.1% vs 1.6%, P = 0.002) or to attend a top 40 National Institutes of Health-funded school (US: 31.0% vs 19.4%, P = 0.002) compared to unmatched applicants. Program directors heavily factored step 1 and step 2 scores, letters of recommendation, interactions with faculty and trainees, and interpersonal skills when interviewing and ranking applicants. The proportion of active general surgery residents versus applicants was lower for Asians (12.3% vs 20.9%, P < 0.001), Black/African American (5.0% vs 8.8%, P < 0.001), Hispanic/Latino (5.0% vs 9.4%, P = 0.001), and underrepresented in medicine students (10.3% vs 19.1%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: In the pass/fail step 1 era, factors including step 2 score and other subjective metrics may be more heavily weighted in the GSR match process.

Increasing Importance and Costs Associated With Publishing for Dermatology Residency Applicants.

The financial costs associated with publishing in academic journals have steadily risen in recent years, reflected by higher publishing fees and the emergence of open access (OA) publishing models. Research remains an essential part of academia and has special significance for residency applicants. Due to recent changes in some objective measures used to rank residency applicants, such as abandoning numerical United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores and transitioning pre-clinical grades to Pass/Fail, other objective measures have gained significance: in particular, the quality and quantity of research activities including manuscripts, abstracts, and presentations have become more important in residency applications. This has led to a significant increase in the reported number of research experiences and publications to more competitive specialties, including dermatology. Our study analyzes the current financial landscape of publishing in the field of dermatology and the financial burden placed on applicants as well as programs to meet the expected number of research experiences in order to successfully match into a dermatology residency. Through a comprehensive examination of 85 dermatology-based academic journals, we assess the costs and differences of publishing in OA and hybrid OA journals while also exploring potential avenues for mitigating the financial burden of publishing. Our findings indicate that while cost-effective options exist, the financial burden of article processing charges remains substantial.

Sending a Signal: Evaluating the Impact of Program and Geographic Preference Signaling on the Internal Medicine Residency Match.

Background For over a decade, the number of residency applications has surged, a trend known as "application inflation." COVID-19 further intensified this trend, leading the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) to address the issue by introducing a supplemental application in the 2021-2022 cycle, allowing programs to identify applicants with a connection to their program or geographic region. For the 2022-2023 cycle, the number of program signals increased from five to seven. The impact of the supplemental application and the increase in signals on the likelihood of an applicant matching with a program has yet to be evaluated. Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of program signaling and geographic preference on the matching likelihood in our internal medicine residency program. Data from MyERAS® and the Supplemental Application for 640 applicants who applied to our large, urban, university-based program in the Southeastern United States during the 2020-2021 and 2022-2023 application cycles were included. Using univariate and multivariate analysis, we examined the correlation between program signal, geographic preference, and final match location. Results Applicants who sent a program signal had nearly three-fold higher odds of matching with our program. Geographic preference was numerically but not statistically associated with higher odds of matching. Both signaling a preference for matching with a program in an urban environment and couples matching correlated with decreased odds of matching with our program. Geography was an important predictor of match location as residing in our AAMC geographic region, our four-state area, and our specific state had increased odds of matching with our program. Conclusions Signaling our program was associated with increased odds of matching with our program. Geographic preferences were less predictive of a match with our program; however, they did predict the likelihood of a match at a program within that region. Future studies are needed to ensure external validity.

Creation of an Automated and Comprehensive Resident Progress System for Residents and to Save Hours of Faculty Time: Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: It is vital for residents to have a longitudinal view of their educational progression, and it is crucial for the medical education team to have a clear way to track resident progress over time. Current tools for aggregating resident data are difficult to use and do not provide a comprehensive way to evaluate and display resident educational advancement. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the creation and assessment of a system designed to improve the longitudinal presentation, quality, and synthesis of educational progress for trainees. We created a new system for residency progress management with 3 goals in mind, that are (1) a long-term and centralized location for residency education data, (2) a clear and intuitive interface that is easy to access for both the residents and faculty involved in medical education, and (3) automated data input, transformation, and analysis. We present evaluations regarding whether residents find the system useful, and whether faculty like the system and perceive that it helps them save time with administrative duties. METHODS: The system was created using a suite of Google Workspace tools including Forms, Sheets, Gmail, and a collection of Apps Scripts triggered at various times and events. To assess whether the system had an effect on the residents, we surveyed and asked them to self-report on how often they accessed the system and interviewed them as to whether they found it useful. To understand what the faculty thought of the system, we conducted a 14-person focus group and asked the faculty to self-report their time spent preparing for residency progress meetings before and after the system debut. RESULTS: The system went live in February 2022 as a quality improvement project, evolving through multiple iterations of feedback. The authors found that the system was accessed differently by different postgraduate years (PGY), with the most usage reported in the PGY1 class (weekly), and the least amount of usage in the PGY3 class (once or twice). However, all of the residents reported finding the system useful, specifically for aggregating all of their evaluations in the same place. Faculty members felt that the system enabled a more high-quality biannual clinical competency committee meeting and they reported a combined time savings of 8 hours in preparation for each clinical competency committee as a result of reviewing resident data through the system. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reports on the creation of an automated, instantaneous, and comprehensive resident progress management system. The system has been shown to be well-liked by both residents and faculty. Younger PGY classes reported more frequent system usage than older PGY classes. Faculty reported that it helped facilitate more meaningful discussion of training progression and reduced the administrative burden by 8 hours per biannual session.

Development of a bleeding arteriovenous fistula task trainer.

BACKGROUND: As end-stage renal disease becomes more prevalent in the United States, the number of Americans with arteriovenous (AV) fistulas continues to increase. One of the most feared complications of AV fistulas is life-threatening hemorrhage, as patients can exsanguinate within minutes. OBJECTIVES: As frontline healthcare workers, emergency medicine (EM) providers need to be able to provide rapid and effective treatment for this rare presentation. We developed a task trainer model to simulate AV fistula hemorrhage to prepare and train EM residents. METHODS: This task trainer model was constructed with readily available materials and takes about 30 minutes to make. Twenty-one EM residents participated in the training session. The session consisted of a brief didactic on AV fistula hemorrhage control followed by hands on usage of the task-trainer model. The participants filled out an anonymous survey afterwards rating the model. RESULTS: Residents completed anonymous postcourse surveys rating the session on a five-point Likert scale. Both the overall teaching session and the task trainer were rated very highly. Compared to precourse ratings, residents reported statistically significant postcourse improvements in their level of confidence in managing AV fistula hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first published task trainer model to simulate a bleeding AV fistula for EM residents. The model was well received by our trainees, is relatively inexpensive, and made from easily sourced materials. We believe this model can be used for trainees of all disciplines to prepare them for this potentially catastrophic patient presentation.

The Israeli anesthesiology workforce crisis: a reassessment survey.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesiologists provide crucial anesthesiology services in the operating room and non-operating room locations. Combined with an aging and growing Israeli population, there is an increasing demand for anesthesiology services. A previous study performed in 2005 showed that most anesthesiologists are immigrant physicians with few Israeli medical school graduates. Since then, physician immigration decreased, many have retired and demand for anesthesia services has increased while insufficient numbers of new anesthesiologists were trained, leading to a shortage, limiting surgeries and other procedures in many hospitals. The present study examined the composition of the Israeli anesthesiology workforce in 2021and compared it to the 2005 workforce. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of demographic and professional information about each Israeli hospital anesthesiologists was solicited from 34 anesthesiology department chairs responsible for 36 Israeli acute care hospitals. RESULTS: There are 1313 anesthesiologists in the 36 hospitals, resulting in a ratio of 14.2 anesthesiologists per 100,000 population. 22.6% of anesthesiologists will reach retirement age over the next ten years. The proportion of female anesthesiologists was 28.7%. While Israeli medical school graduates increased to 18.1% from 12.2% in 2005, non-Israeli citizens and non-permanent residents comprised 8.5% of the workforce. CONCLUSIONS: Despite growth in the ratio of anesthesiologists per population, a workforce shortage is expected to worsen over the next ten years due to retirements, shortened call hours, and the Yatziv reform which bans graduates of certain overseas medical schools from obtaining Israeli Medical Licenses. The current workforce has compensated for the existing shortage of anesthesiologists by enlisting non-Israeli trainees from overseas. Yet, it is crucial to maintain and enlarge the local Israeli workforce to forestall a worsening shortage.

Moral Harassment and Mental Health in Medical Residents: A Longitudinal Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates if moral harassment contributes to anxiety, depression and burnout among medical residents. METHODS: This three-stage longitudinal study involves 218 first-year residents, with 76 (34.9%) participating throughout all stages. The questionnaire covered demographics, mental health (using Patient Health Questionnaire - 4 - PHQ-4), burnout (using Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey - MBI-HSS), and harassment experiences. Logistic regression analyzed mental health outcomes and harassment. RESULTS: The study found significant variations in anxiety and depression scores, along with a notable decrease in the personal accomplishment dimension of burnout. Harassment prevalence was above 90%, and most victims were disturbed by harassment suffered. While a direct correlation between harassment victimization and decreased mental health was not found, seeking help exacerbated suffering, and surgical program residents had a smaller increase in depression and emotional exhaustion. CONCLUSIONS: To the extent of our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study on mental health and harassment among medical residents. Mental suffering after taking action against harassment suggests that safe environments for addressing these issues are lacking in residency. Further studies concerning surgical residents could shed light on their lower levels of suffering. Institutional changes are necessary to embrace victims and create a healthy environment.