Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mol Plant ; 17(7): 1054-1072, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807366

RESUMEN

Karrikins and strigolactones govern plant development and environmental responses through closely related signaling pathways. The transcriptional repressor proteins SUPPRESSOR OF MAX2 1 (SMAX1), SMAX1-like2 (SMXL2), and D53-like SMXLs mediate karrikin and strigolactone signaling by directly binding downstream genes or by inhibiting the activities of transcription factors. In this study, we characterized the non-transcriptional regulatory activities of SMXL proteins in Arabidopsis. We discovered that SMAX1 and SMXL2 with mutations in their ethylene-response factor-associated amphiphilic repression (EAR) motif had undetectable or weak transcriptional repression activities but still partially rescued the hypocotyl elongation defects and fully reversed the cotyledon epinasty defects of the smax1 smxl2 mutant. SMAX1 and SMXL2 directly interact with PHYTOCHROME INTERACTION FACTOR 4 (PIF4) and PIF5 to enhance their protein stability by interacting with phytochrome B (phyB) and suppressing the association of phyB with PIF4 and PIF5. The karrikin-responsive genes were then identified by treatment with GR24ent-5DS, a GR24 analog showing karrikin activity. Interestingly, INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID INDUCIBLE 29 (IAA29) expression was repressed by GR24ent-5DS treatment in a PIF4- and PIF5-dependent and EAR-independent manner, whereas KARRIKIN UPREGULATED F-BOX 1 (KUF1) expression was induced in a PIF4- and PIF5-independent and EAR-dependent manner. Furthermore, the non-transcriptional regulatory activity of SMAX1, which is independent of the EAR motif, had a global effect on gene expression. Taken together, these results indicate that non-transcriptional regulatory activities of SMAX1 and SMXL2 mediate karrikin-regulated seedling response to red light.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Arabidopsis , Arabidopsis , Furanos , Regulación de la Expresión Génica de las Plantas , Luz , Plantones , Arabidopsis/genética , Arabidopsis/metabolismo , Arabidopsis/efectos de la radiación , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/metabolismo , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/genética , Plantones/genética , Plantones/efectos de la radiación , Plantones/crecimiento & desarrollo , Plantones/metabolismo , Regulación de la Expresión Génica de las Plantas/efectos de la radiación , Furanos/farmacología , Furanos/metabolismo , Piranos/farmacología , Piranos/metabolismo , Proteínas Represoras/metabolismo , Proteínas Represoras/genética , Factores de Transcripción con Motivo Hélice-Asa-Hélice Básico/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción con Motivo Hélice-Asa-Hélice Básico/genética , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción/genética , Hipocótilo/genética , Hipocótilo/crecimiento & desarrollo , Hipocótilo/metabolismo , Mutación , Luz Roja , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intracelular
2.
Plant Cell Physiol ; 63(12): 1900-1913, 2023 Jan 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35681253

RESUMEN

Recent investigations in Arabidopsis thaliana suggest that SUPPRESSOR of MORE AXILLARY GROWTH 2 1 (SMAX1) and SMAX1-LIKE2 (SMXL2) are negative regulators of karrikin (KAR) and strigolactone (SL) signaling during plant growth and development, but their functions in drought resistance and related mechanisms of action remain unclear. To understand the roles and mechanisms of SMAX1 and SMXL2 in drought resistance, we investigated the drought-resistance phenotypes and transcriptome profiles of smax1 smxl2 (s1,2) double-mutant plants in response to drought stress. The s1,2 mutant plants showed enhanced drought-resistance and lower leaf water loss when compared with wild-type (WT) plants. Transcriptome comparison of rosette leaves from the s1,2 mutant and the WT under normal and dehydration conditions suggested that the mechanism related to cuticle formation was involved in drought resistance. This possibility was supported by enhanced cuticle formation in the rosette leaves of the s1,2 mutant. We also found that the s1,2 mutant plants were more sensitive to abscisic acid in assays of stomatal closure, cotyledon opening, chlorophyll degradation and growth inhibition, and they showed a higher reactive oxygen species detoxification capacity than WT plants. In addition, the s1,2 mutant plants had longer root hairs and a higher root-to-shoot ratio than the WT plants, suggesting that the mutant had a greater capacity for water absorption than the WT. Taken together, our results indicate that SMAX1 and SMXL2 negatively regulate drought resistance, and disruption of these KAR- and SL-signaling-related genes may therefore provide a novel means for improving crop drought resistance.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Arabidopsis , Arabidopsis , Arabidopsis/metabolismo , Proteínas de Arabidopsis/metabolismo , Resistencia a la Sequía , Germinación/genética , Ácido Abscísico/metabolismo , Sequías , Regulación de la Expresión Génica de las Plantas , Péptidos y Proteínas de Señalización Intracelular/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA