RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Serious mental illness (SMI) is a debilitating medical condition that causes stress and challenges for the family caregivers (FCs) of affected patients, increasing their caregiver burden (CB). This situation can activate attachment styles (AS) and trigger negative emotions, further contributing to CB. Given that AS and cognitive-emotional regulation (CER) can affect the CB of FCs of patients with SMI, the aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between CB with AS, and CER among the FCs. METHODS: This cross-sectional descriptive-correlational study was carried out in May-November 2022. Participants were 278 FCs of patients with SMI consecutively recruited from Roozbeh leading psychiatric hospital, Tehran, Iran. Data were collected using a patients' demographic and clinical characteristics questionnaire, an FCs' demographic characteristics questionnaire, the Attachment Style Questionnaire, the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, and the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers, and were analyzed using the SPSS software (v. 16.0). RESULTS: CB had significant inverse relationship with secure AS (r = - 0.262) and significant positive relationship with fearful AS (r = 0.194) and dismissive AS (r = 0.242) (P < 0.01). Moreover, CB had significant inverse relationship with adaptive CER strategies and significant positive relationship with maladaptive CER strategies (P < 0.001). Regression analysis also showed that CB had significant relationship with secure AS and catastrophizing, rumination, self-blame, and positive refocusing CER strategies (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study concludes that AS and CER can impact CB. There is a negative relationship between secure AS and CB, as well as between adaptive CER strategies and CB. Conversely, there is a positive relationship between avoidant AS and increased CB, as well as between maladaptive CER strategies and CB. It is recommended to adopt strategies that promote the use of secure AS and adaptive CER among the FCs of patients with SMI.
Asunto(s)
Carga del Cuidador , Cuidadores , Trastornos Mentales , Apego a Objetos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Transversales , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Cuidadores/psicología , Irán , Carga del Cuidador/psicología , Regulación Emocional , Emociones , Anciano , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cognición , Adulto Joven , Familia/psicología , Adaptación PsicológicaRESUMEN
Measuring quality of care is a critical first step towards improving the healthcare contributing to persistent poor outcomes experienced by many people living with schizophrenia. This scoping review aims to identify and characterize indicators for measuring the quality of care for people living with schizophrenia. We searched 6 academic databases, 4 grey literature databases, and 23 organization websites for documents containing quality indicators developed for or applied in a population with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. We identified 119 unique documents, yielding 390 distinct quality indicators. Most measures were process indicators (68 %; n = 267) commonly reflecting safety (30 %; n = 118) and effectiveness (35 %; n = 136) domains of quality of care. Quality indicators included measures of primarily mental healthcare (77 %; n = 299), as well as physical healthcare (23 %; n = 91). Indicators reflected aspects of care related to service delivery, pharmacotherapy, assessments, resources and policies, psychological interventions, social and other interventions. Indicator development was notable for a lack of well-described validation and selection processes. Gaps in indicator availability for comorbid substance use, reproductive health, and healthcare equity were also identified. Results reflect a growing recognition of the importance of quality measurement in this population but highlight the need for prioritization of indicators to guide future quality measurement and improvement.
RESUMEN
The cardiometabolic health outcomes and life expectancy of people living with serious mental illness (SMI) continue to significantly flag behind that of the general population. This study explores the possibility of using the evidence-based Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model and infrastructure to increase access to primary care and improve cardiometabolic outcomes of people with SMI. Four ACT teams in a large urban area received the services of a primary care consultant who was co-located at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC), met regularly with ACT team clinicians to review a cardiometabolic registry of participants, and engaged participants in primary care services. Health screening rates, primary care utilization, and cardiometabolic outcomes-body mass index, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, cholesterol, and tobacco smoking status-were monitored over the course of a year. The efficacy of this integrated care model was also explored through focus groups with ACT team staff and participants. Significant improvements in screening rates were found for the ACT teams that received this integrated care intervention; however, only modest improvements in cardiometabolic outcomes were found. Future longitudinal, multi-site studies are needed to fully determine the impact of integrated care models on the physical health outcomes of this vulnerable population.
RESUMEN
There are many group EBPs that are now listed as effective treatments for those with serious mental illness (SMI). Despite this, there are few of these group EBPs that are being delivered consistently in the public sector, causing disparity. This article reviews the challenges that relate to implementation science and those with SMI receiving group EBPs to help them live a life of meaning as they define. The article discusses the need for adaptations of EBPs as individuals with complex concerns need different approaches to implementation science. Next, the article conveys what core constructs of group EBPs have to be maintained as they are and what elements of EBPs need adapting to empower those with SMI in engagement. This article provides knowledge of practical application of implementation science approaches while providing dialectical behavior group therapy and cognitive behavior group therapy for psychosis adaptations for those with SMI in a public sector inpatient setting.
RESUMEN
Mental health disorders constitute a major global disease burden, especially in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Due to issues related to access, hygiene, economic pressures, and communication, the oral health of individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) receives little attention. This scoping review comprehensively maps and synthesises the existing literature on oral health primary preventive interventions (OHPPIs) in LMICs, highlighting key strategies and challenges encountered in addressing oral health disparities in resource-constrained settings. We systematically searched Cochrane Library, Ovid (MEDLINE), PsycINFO and Embase. The search strategy included keywords and MeSH terms related to oral health, SMI interventions, and LMICs. We included all types of OHPPI, (preventive, promotive, behavioural, and educational approaches) implemented in LMICs. We identified three studies focused on OHPPI for SMI patients that met our inclusion criteria. The interventions included were: (I) educational interventions; (II) behavioural interventions combining motivational and educational elements, and (III) self-assessment interventions combining educational and physical elements. Multifaceted barriers and challenges to effective oral health interventions were identified covering limited access to dental services, and socio-economic disparities. This scoping review underscores the need to develop and test context-specific strategies, capacity building, and policy support to improve oral health outcomes in LMICs.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Trastornos Mentales , Salud Bucal , Humanos , Prevención PrimariaRESUMEN
Introduction: Early detection of individuals at risk for onset of severe illness is crucial for prevention and early intervention, aiming to mitigate the long-term impact on both the individual and the community. While well-established models exist for predicting the onset and prolonged severity of illness, there is a gap in understanding illness-onset severity. This pilot study aimed to investigate premorbid objective and subjective dimensions of participation in daily life occupations, as well as sensory and cognitive functions as potential markers of the recent-onset mental illness severity. Methods: A total of 50 participants (men: N=26, 52%; women: N=24, 48%), aged 18-40 (M=26.2, SD=5.8) with recent-onset mental illness completed standard, well-established assessments of illness severity, cognitive biases and failures, neurocognitive status, participation in daily life, and sensory responsiveness thorough cross-sectional design. The differences between the groups of the illness severity were explored with descriptive statistics, followed by a Kruskal-Wallis test. Discriminant analysis was used suggesting a multi-varied model for the separation between the groups of illness severity. Results: Three groups of illness severity exhibited differences in premorbid cognitive functions (F(2)=5.8, p<.01) and participation diversity (F(2)=3.8, p<.05). Combining these two indices explained 92% of the variance between the groups (Wilks' Λ = .68, χ2(4) = 17.7, p=.001), accurately classifying mild to marked illness severity (62.5-88.5%). Conclusions: The study contributes to revealing factors involved in the formation of more severe mental illness and suggesting possible avenues for early intervention and prevention. Cognitive biases and sensory modulation dysfunction may contribute to the illness formation. Still, the most effective markers of more severe mental illness onset are functional cognition and limited participation diversity. Since addressing these markers is a unique specialization within occupational therapy, the findings highlight the potential contribution the profession can make to the early identification of the most vulnerable populations.
RESUMEN
Background: People with severe mental illness who experience co-occurring substance use experience poor outcome including suicide, violence, relapses and use of crisis services. They struggle to access care and treatment due to a lack of an integrated and co-ordinated approach which means that some people can fall between services. Despite these concerns, there is limited evidence as to what works for this population. Objectives: To undertake a realist evaluation of service models in order to identify and refine programme theories of what works under what contexts for this population. Design: Realist synthesis and evaluation using published literature and case study data. Setting: Mental health, substance use and related services that had some form of service provision in six locations in the United Kingdom (five in England and one in Northern Ireland). Participants: People with lived experience of severe mental illness and co-occurring substance use, carers and staff who work in the specialist roles as well as staff in mental health and substance use services. Results: Eleven initial programme theories were generated by the evidence synthesis and in conjunction with stakeholders. These theories were refined through focus groups and interviews with 58 staff, 25 service users and 12 carers across the 6 case study areas. We identified three forms of service provision (network, consultancy and lead and link worker); however, all offered broadly similar interventions. Evidence was identified to support most of the 11 programme theories. Theories clustered around effective leadership, workforce development and collaborative integrated care pathways. Outcomes that are meaningful for service users and staff were identified, including the importance of engagement. Limitations: The requirement for online data collection (due to the COVID-19 pandemic) worked well for staff data but worked less well for service users and carers. Consequently, this may have reduced the involvement of those without access to information technology equipment. Conclusion: The realist evaluation co-occurring study provides details on how and in what circumstances integrated care can work better for people with co-occurring severe mental health and alcohol/drug conditions. This requires joined-up policy at government level and local integration of services. We have also identified the value of expert clinicians who can support the workforce in sustaining this programme of work. People with co-occurring severe mental health and alcohol/drug conditions have complex and multifaceted needs which require a comprehensive and long-term integrated approach. The shift to integrated health and social care is promising but will require local support (local expert leaders, network opportunities and clarity of roles). Future work: Further work should evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of service models for this group. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020168667. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR128128) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 67. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
There are very few services in the United Kingdom that currently provide a service for people with co-occurring severe mental health and alcohol/drug conditions. We identified a set of factors that are likely to promote better outcomes for people with co-occurring severe mental health and alcohol/drug conditions including commitment from leaders across organisations to address this issue and support staff training. A local expert clinical leader was seen to be important in enabling closer working between mental health and substance use. Service users and carers recognised that when care was co-ordinated, and staff demonstrated empathy and compassion, they were more likely to engage in treatment. Further work will be needed to evaluate how helpful some of the aspects of the models of care are in helping people in their recovery goals.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Salud Mental , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Reino Unido , Irlanda del Norte , Femenino , Masculino , Grupos Focales , AdultoRESUMEN
The transition from hospital to home can be especially challenging for those with multiple chronic conditions and co-occurring serious mental illness (SMI). This population tends to be Medicaid-insured and disproportionately experiences health-related social needs. The aim of this scoping review was to identify the elements and outcomes of hospital-to-home transitional care programs for people diagnosed with SMI. A scoping review was conducted using Arksey and O'Malley's methodology. Three databases were searched; ten articles describing eight transitional care programs published from 2013 to 2024 met eligibility criteria. Five programs focused on patients being discharged from a psychiatric admission. Five of the interventions were delivered in the home. Intervention components included coaching services, medication management, psychiatric providers, and counseling. Program lengths ranged from one month to 90 days post-hospitalization. These programs evaluated quality of life, psychiatric symptoms, medication adherence, readmissions, and emergency department utilization. Notably, few programs appeared to directly address the unmet social needs of participants. While the focus and components of each transitional care program varied, there were overall positive improvements for participants in terms of improved quality of life, increased share decision making, and connections to primary and specialty care providers.
RESUMEN
Schizophrenia is the most strongly stigmatized psychiatric diagnosis, with negative stereotypes including assumptions of incompetence and inability to recover. Individuals with cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) have reported stigma experiences, suggesting that CIAS carries stigma in addition to the stigma associated with schizophrenia as a diagnostic label. While research has established that mental illness stigma more generally is linked with poor psychiatric and functional outcomes, no research has explored correlates of CIAS stigma. This study evaluated cognitive, psychiatric, and functional correlates of CIAS stigma among 54 individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders participating in a cognitive remediation trial. Participants with greater estimated cognitive decline reported higher levels of CIAS stigma experiences. Participants who reported higher levels of CIAS stigma also scored higher on a measure of depressive symptom severity. No significant associations were found between CIAS stigma and positive and negative psychosis symptoms or general psychopathology ratings. CIAS stigma was not associated with performance-based functional capacity or ratings of community functioning. Findings suggest that CIAS stigma is linked with the degree of cognitive decline and depressive symptom severity among individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Additional research is needed to elucidate directionality and the relationship between CIAS stigma and functioning outcomes.
RESUMEN
The impact of childhood abuse on the presentation of bipolar disorder could be further elucidated by comparing the networks of affective symptoms among individuals with and with no history of childhood abuse. Data from 476 participants in the Clinical Health Outcomes Initiative in Comparative Effectiveness for Bipolar Disorder study were used to fit several regularised Gaussian Graphical Models. Differences in the presentation of depressive and manic symptoms were uncovered: only among participants with a history of childhood abuse, inadequacy and pessimism were central symptoms in the network of depressive symptoms, while racing thoughts was an important symptom in the network of manic symptoms. Following network theory, focusing treatments at the symptom-level and on central symptoms - like inadequacy, pessimism, and racing thoughts - could be an effective approach for managing affective symptoms among the sizeable proportion of people with bipolar disorder who have experienced childhood abuse. This study contributes a thorough investigation of the networks of affective symptoms among participants with and with no history of childhood abuse, albeit limited by the use of a binary, self-report measure of childhood abuse, thereby emphasising the importance of assessing for childhood abuse and taking needed steps towards identifying novel targets for treating bipolar disorder.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Approximately 5.5% of the population live with serious mental illnesses (SMI). Older adults with SMI experience a high burden of serious medical illnesses and disparities in advance care planning, symptom management, and caregiver support. The objectives of this study are to explore interdisciplinary clinician perspectives on the palliative care needs of older adults with SMI and serious medical illnesses. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study utilized thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews of interdisciplinary clinicians practicing palliative care, geriatrics, or geriatric/consultation-liaison psychiatry at four hospitals within an urban health system. MEASUREMENTS: Themes related to care of older adults with serious mental illness and serious medical illness with respect to clinician experiences, challenges in care, and opportunities to improve care. RESULTS: The authors interviewed 45 clinicians. Major themes identified were: (1) Current paradigms of palliative care do not meet the needs of patients with SMI; (2) Clinicians are motivated to care for this population but require more training and interdisciplinary practice; (3) There is a need for structural integration of psychiatric and palliative care services. CONCLUSIONS: The study underscores the inadequacy of current palliative care models in meeting the unique needs of older adults with SMI. Models of integrated psychiatric and serious illness care and enhanced training are needed to improve the delivery of palliative care. Integrated care models and workforce development at the interface of serious illness care and psychiatric have the potential to improve outcomes for this vulnerable population.
RESUMEN
Community mental health centers (CMHCs) offer invaluable, publicly-funded treatment for serious mental illness (SMI). Unfortunately, evidence-based psychological treatments are often not delivered at CMHCs, in part due to implementation barriers, such as limited time, high caseloads, and complex clinical presentations. Transdiagnostic treatments may help address these barriers, because they allow providers to treat symptoms across multiple disorders concurrently. However, little research has investigated CMHC providers' experiences of delivering transdiagnostic treatments "on the ground," particularly for adults with SMI. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess CMHC providers' perspectives on delivering a transdiagnostic treatment - the Transdiagnostic Intervention for Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction (TranS-C) - to adults diagnosed with SMI. In the context of a larger parent trial, providers were randomized to deliver a standard version of TranS-C (Standard TranS-C) or a version adapted to the CMHC context (Adapted TranS-C). Twenty-five providers from the parent trial participated in a semi-structured interview (n = 10 Standard TranS-C; n = 15 from Adapted TranS-C). Responses were deductively and inductively coded to identify themes related to Proctor's taxonomy of implementation outcomes. Four novel "transdiagnostic take homes" were identified: (1) transdiagnostic targets, such as sleep, can be perceived as motivating and appropriate when treating SMI, (2) strategies to bolster client motivation/adherence and address a wider range of symptom severity may improve transdiagnostic treatments, (3) balancing feasibility with offering in-depth resources is an important challenge for transdiagnostic treatment development, and (4) adapting transdiagnostic treatments to the CMHC context may improve provider perceptions of implementation outcomes.
RESUMEN
Background: Spain healthcare system is decentralized, with seventeen autonomous regions overseeing healthcare. However, penitentiary healthcare is managed nationally, except in Catalonia, the Basque Country, and Navarra. These variations impact mental health care provision for inmates with serious mental illness (SMI). Objective: To delineate differences between regions in terms of mental health care provision for individuals with SMI, available resources, and the perspectives of healthcare professionals operating in the Spanish prison environment. Methods: Employing an explanatory sequential mixed-method approach, the study conducted an extensive literature review, quantitative data collection through structured questionnaires, and qualitative data collection via focus groups and four in-depth interviews. Analysis involved calculating percentages and ratios for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data interpretation to comprehensively understand mental healthcare provision. Results: In December 2021, about 4% of inmates in Spain had SMI. There are three distinct models of mental healthcare within the Spanish prison system. The traditional penitentiary model, representing 83% of the incarcerated population, operates independently under the General Secretariat of Penitentiary Institutions at a national level. This model relies on an average of 5.2 penitentiary General Practitioners (pGP) per 1,000 inmates for psychiatric and general healthcare. External psychiatrists are engaged for part-time psychiatric assessment. Acute psychiatric hospitalization occurs in general nursing modules within penitentiary centers or in Restricted Access Units (RAUs) in reference hospitals. Two penitentiary psychiatric hospitals provide care to unimputable SMI inmates from all over Spain. Innovative penitentiary models, constituting 17% of the prison population, integrate penitentiary healthcare within regional public health systems. The Basque Country features a Mental Health Unit with full-time care teams within the penitentiary center. Catalonia emphasizes community care, providing full-time dedicated psychiatric services within and outside prisons, ensuring continued care in the community. Both models prioritize personnel with specialized mental health training and compensation akin to non-prison healthcare settings. Conclusions: Regional disparities in penitentiary mental healthcare models in Spain result in resource inequalities, impacting specialized care for inmates with SMI and opportunities for healthcare professionals. The models in the Basque Country and Catalonia offer valuable experiences for penitentiary healthcare.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many older people are now living with co-occurring physical and mental health disorders, but these often managed separately. The aim of this systematic review was to explore integrated physical-mental health care services available internationally for older people living with mental health diagnoses, and whether these result in improved health outcomes. METHODS: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus were searched with a predefined search strategy (PROSPERO: CRD42022383824), generating 6210 articles. Studies were included where an integrated physical-mental health care service model was utilised in a population of older people (aged >60 years) with a mental health diagnosis (including dementia or cognitive impairment) and at least one concomitant physical health condition requiring physical health care input. All studies were assessed for risk of bias (ROB 2.0, ROBINS-I) and results were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: Nine studies were included across inpatient (n = 6, 1262 patients) and community (n = 3, 466 patients) settings. Studies were rated as low-moderate risk of bias. These covered joint physical-mental health wards, liaison services, embedded physicians in mental health wards, and joint multidisciplinary teams. Services with greater integration (e.g., joint wards) had more benefits for patients and carers. There were few benefits to traditional outcomes (e.g., hospital admissions, mortality), but greater care quality, carer satisfaction, and improved mood and engagement were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary integrated care resulted in improvement of a range of health outcomes for older people with combined physical and mental health needs. Larger and more robust studies are needed to explore the development of these service models further, with cost-effectiveness analyses.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Trastornos Mentales , Servicios de Salud Mental , Humanos , Anciano , Trastornos Mentales/terapiaRESUMEN
This prospective observational study aimed to evaluate the rate of change in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and to explore the factors associated with changes in FEV1 in people with serious mental illness (SMI). Sixty subjects diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder who were smokers and without history of respiratory illness agreed to participate. The mean (range) follow-up period was 3.54 (3.00-4.98) years. The mean (standard deviation) annual rate of change in FEV1 decreased by 39.1 (105.2) mL/year. Thirty-one (51.7 %) patients experienced a decrease in the FEV1 ≥40 mL/year (i.e. a rapid decline). The factors associated with the absolute change in FEV1 were the baseline International Physical Activity Questionnaire activity score in metabolic equivalents of tasks (ß 0.145, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.043 to 0.246; p = 0.005), baseline FEV1 (ß -0.025, 95 % CI -0.076 to 0.027; p = 0.352), and the interaction term of both variables (ß -3.172e-05, 95 % CI -6.025e-05 to -0.319e-05; p = 0.029). The factors associated with rapid FEV1 decline were income (odds ratio [OR] 0.999, 95 % CI 0.995 to 1.003; p = 0.572), the rate of change in abdominal circumference (OR 0.000, 95 % CI 0.000 to 0.890; p = 0.081), and the interaction term of both variables (OR 1.038, 95 % CI 1.010 to 1.082; p = 0.026). In conclusion, a substantial proportion of people with SMI experienced a rapid decrease in FEV1. If our results are confirmed in larger samples, the routine evaluation of lung function in people with SMI would be an opportunity to identify individuals at greater risk of morbidity and mortality.
RESUMEN
Objective: Serious mental illness (SMI) remains a leading cause of disability worldwide. However, there is limited Australian evidence of community-based programs to enhance the psychosocial wellbeing of adults experiencing SMI. Foundations is a long-term community-based psychosocial outreach support program delivered in Tasmania, Australia. A longitudinal non-randomised controlled trial was conducted to examine the effectiveness of the Foundations program on adults' psychosocial functioning, clinical symptomology, and hospital readmissions, in comparison to standard care only. Method: Participants were adults aged 18-64 years experiencing SMI. Control participants received standard clinical care only. Intervention participants were engaged in the Foundations program in addition to standard care. Data were collected at program commencement, midpoint, closure, and six-months post-closure. Linear mixed modelling was used to examine differences between groups. Results: Intervention participants achieved better psychosocial functioning in comparison to the control group by program closure and at six-month follow-up. No significant differences were observed for clinical mental health symptomology or hospital readmission rates. Length of readmission stay was significantly shorter for intervention participants. Conclusions: The findings highlight the additional value of community-based, recovery-oriented, psychosocial outreach support alongside clinical mental health care to enhance the psychosocial wellbeing of adults experiencing SMI.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Longitudinales , Tasmania , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Funcionamiento PsicosocialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sleep and mental health share a bidirectional relationship whereby problems in one exacerbate the other. Accordingly, sleep problems are frequent and severe in serious mental illness (SMI) populations, exacerbating SMI symptoms. This study examined the documentation and treatment of sleep problems within anonymised clinical records of SMI patients, and their association with attendance rates and number of appointments scheduled. METHODS: Patient records between 01.09.2021 and 31.08.2022 were identified and relevant records (n = 229) extracted from an NHS Trust database. Content analysis was used to assess documentation and treatment of sleep problems and Chi-square tests were used to assess demographic differences. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare attendance rates and number of appointments scheduled between patients with/without sleep problems. RESULTS: Most (n = 170; 84 %) patients with sleep problems had no or minimal assessment of the sleep problem within their records. Patients were primarily offered no (n = 115; 57 %) or non-recommended (n = 69; 34 %) sleep treatment. More outpatients were offered no sleep treatment (n = 89; 64 %) than inpatients (n = 26; 41 %) (p = .002) whilst more inpatients were offered non-recommended sleep treatments (n = 33; 52 %) than outpatients (n = 36; 26 %) (p < .001). No significant associations were found between sleep and attendance or appointments scheduled. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of routine clinical attention to sleep assessment and treatment in SMI groups. Where sleep is addressed, treatment often conflicts with guidelines. Improved sleep assessment and treatment could significantly enhance current SMI patient care.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rates of suicidality are high among young adults and minoritized groups are disproportionately affected. Despite evidence that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may increase suicide-related risk, the underlying mechanisms through which ACEs may impact suicidal ideation (SI) remain poorly understood, especially among marginalized young adults with serious mental illnesses (SMI) such as schizophrenia-spectrum, major depressive, and bipolar disorders. This study examines associations between ACEs and SI, and whether perceived stress, dispositional hope, and mental health hope may mediate the relationship. METHODS: The sample consisted of 114 young adults of color with SMI who participated in a larger randomized trial. Data were analyzed using a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach. RESULTS: Young adults with more ACEs reported higher perceived stress, which in turn, was associated with more SI. Higher perceived stress was associated with lower dispositional and mental health hope. Although dispositional hope was negatively associated with SI on a bivariate level, neither dispositional nor mental health hope was significantly associated with SI in the multivariate SEM. This suggests that over and above perceived stress, hope does not appear to be associated with SI. LIMITATIONS: Key limitations include a cross-sectional design, a modest sample size, and an assessment of select ACEs. CONCLUSION: Addressing stress-related processes may be one promising target for suicide prevention efforts in the context of ACEs. Policy interventions focused on the allocation of resources and changing environments that are stress and trauma-inducing are needed to reduce the occurrence of ACEs and their negative sequelae.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Stigma toward schizophrenia spectrum disorders is pervasive and negatively influences service access and delivery. Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) is common, but its association with stigma is unknown. In this study, the authors examined whether individuals with CIAS receiving cognitive remediation treatment report experiencing CIAS-related stigma and sought to establish associations between CIAS-related stigma and recovery-relevant outcomes. METHODS: Data from 48 individuals with schizophrenia spectrum diagnoses were drawn from a larger study evaluating cognitive remediation. Participants completed measures of CIAS-related stigma, internalized mental illness stigma, self-perceived cognitive impairment, cognitive performance, and interviewer-rated quality of life. RESULTS: CIAS-related stigma was commonly reported and significantly positively associated with internalized stigma and self-perceived cognitive impairment. CIAS-related stigma was also significantly negatively associated with motivation to engage in goal-directed behavior and daily activities. CONCLUSIONS: CIAS-related stigma exists and warrants additional exploration with regard to implications for psychiatric service delivery.