Successful Treatment of Refractory Asthma Clinically Diagnosed As Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis in a Hairdresser Using Tezepelumab.

We report a case of a 53-year-old male hairdresser with refractory asthma clinically diagnosed as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) who showed remarkable improvement with tezepelumab after failing mepolizumab therapy. The patient presented with a three-year history of progressive multisystem involvement, including anosmia, asthma, hearing loss, and skin rash. The patient was clinically diagnosed as EGPA based on asthma, sinusitis with nasal polyps, eosinophilia, and purpura. Despite initial improvement with oral corticosteroids and mepolizumab, he experienced recurrent exacerbations of asthma. Tezepelumab was initiated, resulting in significant symptom improvement, successful corticosteroid tapering, and marked enhancement in pulmonary function tests. This case suggests that tezepelumab may be an effective treatment option for patients with refractory asthma, particularly those with suspected occupational exposure. Further research is needed to identify factors that predict response to different biologic therapies in refractory EGPA-related asthma and to explore the potential role of occupational exposures in treatment outcomes.

Real-World Studies of Biologics for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Asthma.

Presently, there are 6 biologic agents available for treatment of asthma. Each of these agents has undergone robust clinical trials in their approval programs. Such studies rely upon very rigid entry criteria that may not translate to real-world efficacy. Thus, exploring the efficacy of these agents in a larger, more heterogeneous, population brings a sense of comfort regarding their efficacy in the real-world. This review explores the available literature regarding the use of biologics in the real world, with a focus on markers of likely response to therapy.

Biologics in Asthma: Potential to Achieve Clinical Remission.

Establishing a universal definition for asthma remission has the potential to improve asthma outcomes and advance research. However, there is still no consensus definition despite broad multidisciplinary efforts to achieve this goal. This study explores the evolving concept of asthma remission, emphasizing the potential of biologics to achieve this state. We will discuss various proposed definitions of asthma remission, international guidelines, and studies evaluating the effectiveness of biologics at achieving clinical remission. We highlight the need for a consensus definition of asthma remission to standardize treatment goals and improve patient outcomes.

Tezepelumab for severe asthma: elevating current practice to recognize epithelial driven profiles.

BACKGROUND: An increasing amount of evidence supports the relevance of epithelium across the wide spectrum of asthma pathobiology. On a clinical ground tezepelumab, selectively binding TSLP, a major epithelial cytokine, has demonstrated to be effective in asthma patients regardless their specific phenotype. In order to avoid the risk of considering tezepelumab as a not-specific option, the present perspective aims to sketch the tezepelumab best eligible patient profile and to propose some hallmarks of epithelial-driven disease by reviewing the published evidence on the drug mechanism of action and efficacy data. MAIN BODY: Although it cannot rely on standardised or exclusive "markers", the relationship between environment and poor asthma control might suggest a major relevance of the epithelial barrier dysfunction. In that light, allergy and asthma exacerbations concomitant with specific exposures (pathogens, pollutants, chemicals), as well as increased susceptibility to infections can be considered as the hallmark of an impaired epithelial immune response. Tezepelumab is effective in allergic patients, being able to reduce asthma exacerbations precipitated by the exposure to seasonal or perennial aeroallergens, including fungi. In addition, tezepelumab reduced the incidence of co-occurring respiratory illness and asthma exacerbations. In terms of inflammation, epithelial immune response has been related to an impaired mucus hypersecretion and plugging. A placebo-controlled trial demonstrated a significant reduction of mucus plugging in treated patient. Airways hyperreactivity (AHR), airways obstruction and remodelling have been described as an expression of epithelial orchestrated immunological activation. Of note, a significantly higher incidence of mannitol negative test in patients treated with tezepelumab when compared to placebo group has been observed. In addition, A 130 mL improvement in pre-BD FEV1 has been described in patients assuming Tezepelumab. The above-mentioned data suggest that bronchial reversibility and AHR can be considered "functional biomarkers" supporting patients' phenotyping and the identification of tezepelumab best responders. CONCLUSION: Integrating "functional biomarkers" to the inflammatory ones and a better characterization of asthma exacerbations might pave the way to a different and more transversal phenotyping, which overcomes the "restrictive" labels including T2 high, allergic/atopic or T2 low asthma. Precisely defining the disease characteristics and potential targets for a better control even in tezepelumab eligible subjects is essential to avoid the block buster temptation and optimize the personalized medicine approach according to each patient's individuality.

Temporal variation in the effectiveness of biologics in asthma: Effect modification by changing patient characteristics.

BACKGROUND: The underlying population of patients selected for each respiratory monoclonal antibody might change as other biologics are approved. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effect modification by calendar time of the effectiveness of each respiratory biologics in asthma. METHODS: The Effectiveness of Respiratory biologics in Asthma (ERA) is a retrospective cohort of severe asthma patients from the Mass General Brigham clinics between January 2013 and September 2023. Periods were pre-specified as the anti-IgE (2013-2015), anti-IL5 (2016-2018), anti-IL4/13 (2019-2021) or anti-alarmin (2022-2023) era. We evaluated each biologic's effect on asthma-related exacerbations comparing the one-year period before and after therapy initiation using Poisson regression and Cox regression for time-to-first exacerbation. RESULTS: Of 647 biologic-naïve patients, 165 initiated omalizumab, 235 anti-IL5, 227 dupilumab, and 20 tezepelumab. Omalizumab's effectiveness improved as more biologics were approved: incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.16 [0.94-1.43] anti-IgE era vs. 0.54 [0.37-0.80] anti-IL4/13-alarmin era. Omalizumab patients in the anti-IL4/13-alarmin era had lower blood eosinophil counts and less chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). For anti-IL5s, effectiveness peaked in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.52 [0.42-0.64]) when patients had higher BMI and less concomitant CRSwNP. Dupilumab was most effective in the anti-IL4/13 era (IRR 0.60 [0.50-0.72]). There were fewer current smokers in dupilumab patients in the anti-IL4/13 era. Results were similar in time-to-event analyses and in sensitivity analyses accounting for the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: There are temporal variations in the effectiveness of biologics partly explained by the shift in the underlying population, particularly for omalizumab. Though having more choices was associated with better patient selection for omalizumab, this was inconsistent for other biologics.

'Efficacy of biologics in NSAID-ERD: United airways from the nose to the bronchi'.

NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD), the clinical triad of severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and respiratory reactions to cyclooxygenase 1 inhibitors, is often challenging to manage, with many patients failing first line therapies for CRSwNP and asthma. There are now six biologic mediations approved for asthma and/or severe CRSwNP: omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab and tezepelumab. With the availability of respiratory biologic treatment for both asthma and CRSwNP, clinicians now have a multitude of additional management options for patients with NSAID-ERD. Herein we will review the currently available clinical trial and real-world evidence for biologic efficacy and safety patients with NSAID-ERD, discuss the mechanisms of biologic therapy specific to NSAID-ERD, and review evidence regarding the use of biologic therapy versus endoscopic sinus surgery therapy for CRSwNP and NSAID-ERD. We will propose a management approach for choosing biologic therapy or endoscopic sinus surgery with aspirin therapy after desensitization for patients with NSAID-ERD.

Current Goals of NSAID-ERD Management: Patient-Centered Approaches Involving NSAID Desensitization With and Without Biologics.

The classic approach of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD) includes pharmaceutical and surgical treatments, as well as avoidance of cyclooxygenase 1-inhibitor NSAIDs. The introduction of biologics in the treatment of severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps represents an alternative therapeutic approach to the classical aspirin therapy after desensitization (ATAD) in some regions, and with convincing results. However, their use is limited due to approval and/or high-cost restrictions. NSAID-ERD is a mainly type 2 and highly eosinophilic disease, and mAbs targeting IgE or IL-5, IL-4, and IL-13 have been shown to be effective for both severe asthma and severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. So far, dupilumab demonstrated greater efficacy in patients with NSAID-ERD than in aspirin-tolerant patients with regard to several clinical outcomes. Patients with NSAID-ERD respond very rapidly to omalizumab also, with reduction in the release of prostaglandin D2 and cysteinyl leukotrienes. Patients favored biologic treatment over ATAD in multiple retrospective analyses, which must be acknowledged when choosing one or the other option. Although this review will summarize ATAD in general, it will more prominently focus on when ATAD should be considered, even when type 2 biologics are available. In addition, there are conflicting studies as to whether patients on a type 2 biologic become desensitized to NSAIDs, because omalizumab proved to restore tolerance to aspirin in only two-third of patients. This goal of NSAID tolerance should be considered as part of disease control future approaches, representing one of many aspects in a patient-centered care approach.

Short-term Tezepelumab effectiveness in patients with severe asthma: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Severe asthma presents significant management challenges, often requiring advanced treatments to control symptoms and reduce exacerbations. The use of monoclonal antibodies has revolutionized the clinical course of patients with severe asthma, showing a significant impact on exacerbations reduction, oral corticosteroids (OCS) cessation and on the improvement of lung function and quality of life. Tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a potential therapeutic option for these patients. METHODS: We conducted an observational, prospective, multicenter study including 20 patients with confirmed severe asthma according to ERS guidelines and GINA recommendations. Patients received Tezepelumab 210 mg every 4 wk due to uncontrolled asthma despite maximal inhalation treatment with ICS/LABA. Data were collected before treatment initiation (T0) and after three months from the first administration (T3). RESULTS: After three months of Tezepelumab treatment, we reported significant improvements in asthma symptoms and quality of life, as well as a consistent reduction in exacerbations and OCS use. We found no statistically meaningful differences among main clinical and functional outcomes according to inflammatory biomarkers, while lung function improved significantly in patients with less allergic sensitization. No serious adverse event was reported during the follow up, while the rates of mild adverse effects were comparable to those from registration trials. CONCLUSION: Tezepelumab demonstrated short-term efficacy in improving asthma control and quality of life, showing a favorable safety profile. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up would confirm these findings and identify predictors of response to Tezepelumab.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in allergy: Targeting IgE, cytokine, and alarmin pathways.

The etiology of allergy is closely linked to type 2 inflammatory responses ultimately leading to the production of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), a key driver of many allergic conditions. At a high level, initial allergen exposure disrupts epithelial integrity, triggering local inflammation via alarmins including IL-25, IL-33, and TSLP, which activate type 2 innate lymphoid cells as well as other immune cells to secrete type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13, promoting Th2 cell development and eosinophil recruitment. Th2 cell dependent B cell activation promotes the production of allergen-specific IgE, which stably binds to basophils and mast cells. Rapid degranulation of these cells upon allergen re-exposure leads to allergic symptoms. Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying allergic pathophysiology have significantly shaped the development of therapeutic intervention strategies. In this review, we highlight key therapeutic targets within the allergic cascade with a particular focus on past, current and future treatment approaches using monoclonal antibodies. Specific targeting of alarmins, type 2 cytokines and IgE has shown varying degrees of clinical benefit in different allergic indications including asthma, chronic spontaneous urticaria, atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, food allergies and eosinophilic esophagitis. While multiple therapeutic antibodies have been approved for clinical use, scientists are still working on ways to improve on current treatment approaches. Here, we provide context to understand therapeutic targeting strategies and their limitations, discussing both knowledge gaps and promising future directions to enhancing clinical efficacy in allergic disease management.

Tezepelumab for refractory eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis-related asthma.

Conventional immunosuppressants are ineffective for the management of EGPA-related asthma. Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TLSP) that has proven efficacy in several phase 3 studies for the treatment of asthma. We treated with off-label tezepelumab the first two patients with severe refractory EPGA-related asthma. These preliminary findings suggest that targeting upstream signaling of the T2 inflammatory pathway can improve symptoms, reduce BVAS and increase Asthma Control Test scores, even in patients with refractory asthma who have failed several previous lines of treatment. Nevertheless, by analogy with dupilumab-induced IL-4/13 blockade, the persistence of sputum eosinophilia (reported in both patients) raises questions as to whether TSLP inhibition could lead to a rebound of eosinophilia and potentially to eosinophil-related symptoms in patients with EGPA.

Long-term safety of tezepelumab in patients with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Tezepelumab has demonstrated its effectiveness in patients with asthma, but its safety, especially for long-term use, needs to be further explored. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety of long-term use of tezepelumab in patients with asthma. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was made of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov, without language restrictions. STUDY SELECTIONS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on treatment of asthma with tezepelumab, compared with placebo, were reviewed. Studies were pooled to weighted mean differences (WMDs) and risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Seven RCTs (enrolling 2050 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Serious adverse event (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.95), upper respiratory tract infection (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.96), and asthma (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.76) were more frequent in the placebo groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients with at least one adverse event (AE), AEs leading to discontinuation of study treatment, all-cause death, influenza, bronchitis, nasopharyngitis, headache, and hypertension between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Long-term (12-52 wk) use of tezepelumab in patients with asthma does not increase the incidence of adverse events.

Role of Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin in the Pathophysiology of Asthma and Clinical and Biological Effects of Blockade With Tezepelumab.

BACKGROUND: The airway epithelium is the first line of defense of the respiratory system against the external environment. It plays an active role in the initiation of immune and allergic responses against potential hazards. Among the various specialized cells and cytokines that participate in epithelium-induced responses, alarmins are particularly interesting, given their ample role in mediating T2 and non-T2 inflammatory mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of asthma. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) is an alarmin with broad effects in asthma that result from its widespread action on multiple cell types, including eosinophils, mast cells, dendritic cells, and group-2 innate lymphoid cells. Its role in allergy-mediated responses, eosinophilic inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness, mucus hyperproduction, viral tolerance, and airway remodeling is of the utmost importance, as more comprehensive asthma assessments have been developed to explore these pathogenic features. Therefore, blockade with targeting molecules, such as monoclonal antibodies, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option, particularly in patients with multiple pathogenic pathways. In this review, we examine the roles of alarmins (mainly TSLP) in the pathogenesis of asthma and clinical expression and discuss the effects of inhibiting TSLP on several inflammatory and clinical outcomes. We also review the literature supporting treatment with anti-TSLP biologics and the unanswered questions and unmet needs associated with targeting alarmins in asthma.

Real-World Data on Tezepelumab in Patients With Severe Asthma in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Tezepelumab is a novel biologic blocking thymic stromal lymphopoetin, approved for severe asthma irrespective of biomarker levels or phenotype. OBJECTIVE: To characterize a real-world tezepelumab patient cohort and the efficacy among various asthma phenotypes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study on patients with severe asthma initiating tezepelumab. Clinical response was evaluated at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: We included 129 patients with an average age of 52.5 ± 13.1 years, 59.7% were female. The majority (86.0%) had increased type 2 (T2) biomarkers, 68.2% an allergic and 31.8% an eosinophilic phenotype. 23.3% of patients were biologic-naive. 22 (18.2%) patients discontinued tezepelumab therapy owing to suspected side effects or insufficient efficacy. At 6 months' follow-up, median reduction in annualized exacerbation rate was-1 [25th percentile; 75% percentile {-2.9; 0.0}], the reduction of oral corticosteroid dose among patients with long-term oral corticosteroid therapy was -5 mg [-10; 0] and the Asthma Control Test (ACT) improved by 2 [0; 5] points. A treatment response according to Biologic Asthma Response Score of 80.8% was demonstrated. There were no significant differences in treatment response between T2-high versus T2-low, early- versus adult-onset and eosinophilic versus non-eosinophilic asthma. Prior treatment with other biologics was associated with inferior treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-life cohort, including a large proportion of patients with history of previous biologic use and encompassing various subgroups, the majority responded to tezepelumab. Our data further suggest a steroid-sparing effect of tezepelumab.

Tezepelumab improved chronic eosinophilic pneumonia in severe asthma patients with liver cirrhosis.

Systemic administration of corticosteroids is used in the treatment of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP). However, in patients with CEP as well as other comorbidities, the adverse effects of corticosteroids should be minimized as much as possible. A 71-year-old woman was presented with aggravating asthma with CEP and sinusitis, and she had uncompensated liver cirrhosis (LC) with a Child-Pugh score of 7. Initial treatment with a low dose of oral corticosteroids (OCSs) in combination with tezepelumab, an anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) antibody, resulted in rapid improvement of asthma and CEP without deteriorating LC. Sinusitis also improved after ceasing OCS. This case suggested that tezepelumab may be useful as a treatment option for patients with CEP, especially those with liver dysfunction.

Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin and Tezepelumab in Airway Diseases: From Physiological Role to Target Therapy.

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), is a protein belonging to a class of epithelial cytokines commonly called alarmins, which also includes IL-25 and IL-33. Functionally, TSLP is a key player in the immune response to environmental insults, initiating a number of downstream inflammatory pathways. TSLP performs its role by binding to a high-affinity heteromeric complex composed of the thymic stromal lymphopoietin receptor (TSLPR) chain and IL-7Rα. In recent years, the important role of proinflammatory cytokines in the etiopathogenesis of various chronic diseases such as asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP), chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPDs), and chronic spontaneous urticaria has been studied. Although alarmins have been found to be mainly implicated in the mechanisms of type 2 inflammation, studies on monoclonal antibodies against TSLP demonstrate partial efficacy even in patients whose inflammation is not definable as T2 and the so-called low T2. Tezepelumab is a human anti-TSLP antibody that prevents TSLP-TSLPR interactions. Several clinical trials are evaluating the safety and efficacy of Tezepelumab in various inflammatory disorders. In this review, we will highlight major recent advances in understanding the functional role of TSLP, its involvement in Th2-related diseases, and its suitability as a target for biological therapies.

Efficacy of Tezepelumab in Patients with Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma Across Multiple Clinically Relevant Subgroups in the NAVIGATOR Study.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with severe asthma continue to experience symptoms and exacerbations despite treatment with standard-of-care therapy. In the phase 3 NAVIGATOR study, tezepelumab significantly reduced exacerbations over 52 weeks compared with placebo in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma. This analysis assessed the efficacy of tezepelumab in reducing asthma exacerbations in various clinically relevant subgroups of patients in NAVIGATOR. METHODS: NAVIGATOR was a phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants (12-80 years old) with severe, uncontrolled asthma were randomized 1:1 to receive tezepelumab 210 mg or placebo subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. Pre-specified and post hoc analyses were performed to evaluate the annualized asthma exacerbation rate (AAER) over 52 weeks in clinically relevant subgroups of patients defined by baseline patient characteristics, medical history, exacerbation triggers, medication eligibility and medication use before and during the study. RESULTS: Tezepelumab reduced the AAER over 52 weeks compared with placebo across a wide range of patient subgroups assessed. Reductions in exacerbations were similar across subgroups defined by baseline patient characteristics, ranging from 48% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21, 65) to 60% (95% CI: 44, 71) in subgroups analysed by sex, smoking history and body mass index. Among the asthma-related comorbidity subgroups investigated, patients with aspirin or NSAID sensitivity had the greatest reductions in AAER with tezepelumab compared with placebo (83%; 95% CI: 66, 91). In patients eligible to receive dupilumab, tezepelumab reduced exacerbations compared with placebo by 64% (95% CI: 54, 71). Reductions in the AAER with tezepelumab compared with placebo were also observed irrespective of exacerbation trigger category and the number of asthma controller medications patients were receiving at baseline. CONCLUSION: These findings further support the benefits of tezepelumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma and can help to inform healthcare providers' treatment decisions. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NAVIGATOR (NCT03347279).

Early response to Tezepelumab in type-2 severe asthma patients non-responders to other biological treatments: a real-life study.

BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies play a crucial role in the treatment of severe asthma. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody (mAb), inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin, a pivotal factor in the pathophysiology of asthma. Although randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of Tezepelumab, evidence gaps remain in real-world scenarios. OBJECTIVE: We sought investigate Tezepelumab's response in a clinical setting, focusing on patients who previously failed to other asthma mAbs. METHODS: Real-life study with severe uncontrolled asthma patients despite mAb treatment, requiring a switch to Tezepelumab. Follow-up was done four to six months after initiation of Tezepelumab. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the response in patients with poor response or intolerance to other mAbs. RESULTS: Nine patients were followed up during 7 months. Patients were predominantly middle-aged females with eosinophilic or eosinophilic-allergic phenotypes. Patients had a median failure rate of 2 mAbs (IQR 2-3), with an uncontrolled asthma (median of 2 severe exacerbations the previous year, airflow obstruction and 78% corticosteroid dependence). Tezepelumab demonstrated after 4 to 6 months of treatment reduce corticosteroid dependence (complete withdrawal in 2/7 patients), no exacerbations in 6/9, symptoms control improvement (Asthma Control Test score improved in 5/9) and modulate lung function (improving in 3/9 patients). These findings align with clinical trial results, suggesting Tezepelumab's potential in real-world settings. CONCLUSION: In real-world scenarios, despite the study's limitations, our results underscore Tezepelumab's promise as a therapeutic option for uncontrolled severe asthma, and may be useful for non-responders to other mAbs. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Advancements in biologic therapy in eosinophilic asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma encompasses a spectrum of phenotypes often categorized into two groups- type 2 high (T2 high) and type 2 low (T2 low). T2 high includes atopic and eosinophilic presentations whereas T2 low is non-atopic, non-eosinophilic, and oft associated with neutrophilic inflammation. Eosinophilic asthma is often driven by IgE, IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and TSLP. This can lead to eosinophilic inflammatory response in the airways which in turn can be used as target for treatment. AREAS COVERED: The article will focus on biologic therapy that is currently being used in eosinophilic asthma management in mainly the adult population including clinical trials and co-morbidities that can be treated using the same biologics. A review on asthma biologics for pediatric population has been reviewed elsewhere. EXPERT OPINION: Biological therapy for asthma targeting the IgE, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and TSLP pathways are shown to have benefit for the treatment of eosinophilic asthma, as exemplified in real-world studies. When choosing the right biological agent factors such as phenotype, comorbidities, and cost-effectiveness of the biologic agent must be taken into consideration.