RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The current standard for the preoperative marking of non-palpable breast lesions is wire guided localization (WGL) which is associated with logistical efforts and patient discomfort. Non-radioactive seeds (NRS) recently challenged the use of WGL; but do they provide a better alternative from a logistical and environmental perspective? METHODS: WGL standard was compared with NRS available in Germany: Magseed®, Pintuition®, SAVI SCOUT ® and LOCalizer™ on a logistical and carbon-footprinting basis. In the logistical analysis the number of patient contacts with the healthcare system for lesion localization/removal and the number of breast punctures were evaluated in two different clinical scenarios (primary surgery and secondary surgery after neoadjuvant treatment). The carbon footprints of WGL and NRS (with exception of LOCalizer) were assessed based on their material compositions and operating energy in a streamlined approach. RESULTS: Application of NRS reduces the number of contacts by 33.3 % (2 vs. 3) in primary, by 50 % (2 vs. 4) in secondary surgery, and the number of breast punctures by 33.3 % (2 vs.3). Annual Germany-wide material- and energy-based carbon footprints of NRS (1.6-3.2 tons CO2eq) are significantly lower in comparison to WGL (10.3 tons CO2eq). The implementation of NRS would lead to a CO2eq reduction by around 79 % compared to WGL. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NRS for the localization of non palpable breast lesions is more favorable from the environmental and logistical perspective, when compared to WGL with possible benefits for patients, healthcare providers and the environment.
RESUMEN
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of lidocaine-saline solution compared to saline alone for washing out the lumpectomy cavity, focusing on its effect on acute postoperative pain-a prevalent and significant concern among patients undergoing breast surgery. Methods: In this comparative study, 72 patients scheduled for lumpectomy surgery were randomly assigned to either the lidocaine-saline or saline group. The lidocaine-saline group was administered a washout of the lumpectomy cavity with 2 % lidocaine at a dosage of 1.75 mg/kg in 0.9 % normal saline, whereas the saline group received a washout with an equivalent volume of 0.9 % normal saline. We recorded the participants' basic characteristics, heart rate, blood pressure, the incidence and intensity of pain (measured by the visual analogue scale), and the usage of postoperative analgesics. Results: The two study groups did not differ significantly in their basic characteristics, heart rate and blood pressure. The saline group had significantly higher pain intensity than the lidocaine-saline group at 30 min after surgery (4.61 vs. 2.88, P < 0.0001) and at all other time points (P < 0.001). The saline group also took the first dose of analgesics earlier than the lidocaine-saline (46.66 Vs. 170.55 min, P < 0.001) and used a significantly higher mean dose of meperidine (77.50 mg vs 33.47 mg, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of a lidocaine-saline wash during lumpectomy procedures can significantly reduce postoperative pain and lower the necessity for analgesics in patients who have undergone breast surgery.
RESUMEN
Background and Aims: General anaesthesia (GA) is the preferred modality for breast surgeries; however, neuraxial anaesthesia can be performed in cases where GA poses a significant risk. We hypothesise that neuraxial blockade is a safe and effective alternative to GA in short-duration breast surgeries. Methods: This randomised study included 30 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, who were scheduled for elective breast surgeries of a duration of less than 90 min. Group I received thoracic spinal anaesthesia, while in Group II, standardised GA was administered. The primary outcome was the time to the first rescue analgesic, and the secondary outcomes were time to recovery, patient satisfaction and the cost incurred. Results: The demographic characteristics of both groups were comparable (P > 0.05). The time to first rescue analgesic in Group I was more than in Group II (P = 0.001). Patient satisfaction score was superior in Group I compared to Group II (P = 0.002). The average cost was lower in Group I compared to Group II (P = 0.002). Recovery was quicker in Group I than in Group II (P = 0.001). There were no significant haemodynamic disturbances or major complications in either group. Conclusion: Thoracic spinal anaesthesia is an excellent alternative to GA in terms of analgesic efficacy, patient satisfaction, recovery and cost-effectiveness for short-duration breast surgeries.
RESUMEN
The article by Yang et al., titled "Breast Reconstruction-Developing a Volumetric Outcome Algorithm," offers a detailed review of current research on breast volume loss, comparing various reconstruction methods and proposing strategies for optimization. The study examines the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in fat transplantation, highlighting improved fat retention when PRP-enriched grafts are used. However, there is still limited strong clinical evidence supporting PRP's use in breast augmentation. Concerns are raised about the lack of standardized PRP preparation and characterization, as well as the omission of specific details such as platelet counts, leukocyte concentration, and the platelet-to-leukocyte ratio. Addressing these factors is crucial for reaching more reliable conclusions about PRP's role in breast augmentation procedures.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
RESUMEN
Background: Tumescent local anesthesia (TLA) is widely used in esthetic surgery due to its ability to reduce complications, eliminate the need for general anesthesia, provide effective pain control, and shorten hospitalization times. Methods: This study evaluates the use of TLA in 80 patients who underwent augmentation mastopexy between 2010 and 2022. A tumescent solution containing 500 mg lidocaine, 672 mg sodium bicarbonate, and 1 mg epinephrine in 1000 mL of saline was infiltrated, with an average of 300 mL per breast. The surgical technique involved creating a subpectoral pocket for textured round implants (250-400 cc), followed by careful hemostasis. Results: No patients required conversion to general anesthesia, and there were no signs of toxicity or major complications. Minor complications included wound dehiscence (6.2%), hematoma (2.5%), and capsular contracture (2.5%). Pain management satisfaction at 3 months post-surgery was rated as "outstanding" by 12.5% of patients, "excellent" by 67.5%, and "good" by 20%. The longest follow-up was 6 years, with no implant ruptures except one (1.2%). Conclusions: While the study did not include a control group or statistical analysis, the findings suggest that TLA is a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia for augmentation mastopexy, providing excellent pain control and a low rate of complications.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Excess opioid prescribing has societal impacts including addiction, dependence, and misuse. This study aims to investigate prescribing patterns and self-reported patient experiences with opioid use, pain control, and disposal of unused medication following common breast surgeries. Methods: A total of 46 patients undergoing 5 breast procedures were identified during a predefined 14-week period. All procedures were carried out at a single tertiary care hospital by 9 plastic surgeons. Provincial narcotic monitoring program provided linked prescription information for identified patients. All patients were invited to participate in a telephone interview regarding postoperative opioid use. Results: A total of 41.6% of patients received and filled an opioid prescription following a breast procedure. Hydromorphone was the most commonly prescribed narcotic. The average number of opioid tablets dispensed following breast procedures was 31.9. Four percent of breast patients required an opioid refill. A total of 75% of breast patients used at least 1 over-the-counter analgesic, most commonly acetaminophen alone. Average self-reported pain score and total pain period were not significantly different between those using opioids and those not. A total of 6.7% and 23.1% of patients report returning excess narcotics to a pharmacy, while the majority report still having or self-disposing of excess tablets. Conclusions: Opioids are prescribed in excess for the breast procedures we analyzed. The majority of unused opioids were noted to still be at home or disposed of inappropriately. This suggests a role for reviewing opioid-prescribing patterns for common plastic surgery procedures to reduce the burden of the ongoing opioid epidemic.
Objectif: L'excès de prescriptions d'opioïdes a des conséquences sociétales, y compris l'addiction, la dépendance et le mésusage. La présente étude vise à examiner les profils de prescription et les expériences déclarées par les patients à l'égard de l'utilisation d'opioïdes, du contrôle de la douleur et de l'élimination de médicaments non utilisés après des opérations mammaires courantes. Méthodologie: Au total, 46 patientes ont été soumises à cinq interventions mammaires pendant une période prédéfinie de 14 semaines. Toutes les interventions ont été réalisées par neuf chirurgiens plastiques d'un même hôpital de soins tertiaires. Le programme provincial de surveillance des narcotiques a fourni de l'information liée aux prescriptions de ces patientes. Toutes les patientes ont été invitées à participer à une entrevue téléphonique au sujet de l'utilisation d'opioïdes en période postopératoire. Résultats: Au total, 41.6% des patientes ont reçu et utilisé une prescription d'opioïdes après une intervention mammaire. L'hydromorphone était le narcotique le plus prescrit. En moyenne, 3.9 comprimés d'opioïdes ont été administrés après les interventions mammaires. Quatre pour cent des patientes ont demandé un renouvellement de prescription. Ainsi, 75% des patientes ont utilisé au moins un analgésique en vente libre, généralement sous forme d'acétaminophène seule. Le score moyen de douleur autodéclaré et la période totale de la douleur n'étaient pas sensiblement différents entre ceux qui prenaient des opioïdes et ceux qui n'en prenaient pas. Au total, 6.7% et 23.1% des patientes déclarent avoir retourné les excès de narcotiques à la pharmacie, tandis que la majorité d'entre elles indiquent les avoir conservés ou les avoir jetés elles-mêmes. Conclusions: Des excès d'opioïdes ont été prescrits lors des interventions mammaires analysées. La majorité des opioïdes non utilisés étaient encore chez les patientes ou avaient été éliminés de manière inappropriée. Ces constats font ressortir l'intérêt d'examiner les profils de prescription d'opioïdes lors des chirurgies plastiques courantes afin de réduire le fardeau de l'épidémie continue d'opioïdes.
RESUMEN
A woman in her 40s presented to the breast clinic with a 2-year history of an enlarging right breast lump. Examination revealed a 10 cm firm mass in the upper outer quadrant of the right breast. MRI and ultrasonography results revealed an 8 cm mass in the right breast and suspicious axillary nodes. Biopsy results of this mass revealed a sclerosed fibroadenoma (B2). Excision of the right breast lump had shown a benign phyllodes tumour, containing an incidental invasive ductal carcinoma and high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. The patient underwent a right breast cavitectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy, which revealed no further disease. She received adjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy and anti-HER2 treatment, and has remained disease-free at 20-month follow-up. The coexistence of an invasive carcinoma arising within a benign phyllodes tumour is rare. This case report underscores the importance of thoroughly examining excised specimens for phyllodes tumour to exclude malignant components.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Tumor Filoide , Humanos , Femenino , Tumor Filoide/patología , Tumor Filoide/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Adulto , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/patología , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático CentinelaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aims to map the point of emergence of the lateral cutaneous branch of the fourth intercostal nerve in both sexes, addressing gaps in the current literature. The findings are intended to support surgeons in restoring breast function by providing precise anatomical data, regardless of the specific surgical technique employed. METHODS: An anatomical study was conducted using 50 sides from 25 formalin-preserved full-body donors, with equal representation of male and female subjects. Measurements were taken to determine the fascial point of emergence of the lateral cutaneous branch of the fourth intercostal nerve relative to the anterior axillary line and the transverse line. Multiple linear regression models were applied to evaluate the influence of variables such as sex, height, and side. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that the fascial point of emergence of the lateral cutaneous branch of the fourth intercostal nerve is consistently located within 20 to 24 mm relative to the transverse line in 37 (74%) cases, and within 4 to 10 mm relative to the anterior axillary line in 39 (78%) cases, regardless of sex, height, or side. The multiple linear regression analysis showed no significant correlation between these variables and the position of the point of emergence (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results provide surgeons with a practical tool for nerve coaptation during breast reconstruction, showing that sex and height do not affect the anatomical localization of the point of emergence. Precise knowledge of this point can improve surgical accuracy and enhance sensory recovery, leading to better patient outcomes.
RESUMEN
Background: A common postoperative challenge following implant-based breast reconstruction surgery is lateral or inferior displacement of the implant, which ultimately requires surgical intervention to shape the pocket for improved symmetry. Capsulorrhaphy is traditionally performed with smooth sutures, but the use of barbed sutures has proven to be more efficient and effective in other plastic surgery procedures. This study aimed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of barbed sutures for breast reconstruction implant capsulorrhaphy. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed including all consecutive patients who underwent capsulorrhaphy by the senior author utilizing barbed sutures and, for comparison, another colleague utilizing smooth sutures from the years 2018-2021. Results: Twenty-eight patients were identified who underwent barbed suture capsulorrhaphy (a total of 36 breasts operated on), which was compared with 20 patients who had smooth suture capsulorrhaphy (a total of 34 breasts operated on). The average ages of the barbed and smooth suture cohorts were 55 and 53 years old (P = 1.00), respectively. The average BMI of the barbed and smooth suture cohorts were 26.7 and 25.0 kg/m2 (P = .15), respectively. The reoperation rates for both groups were similar at 5%. Overall complication rate was 13.9% in the barbed suture group and 8.8% in the smooth suture group, which was not statistically significant (P = .71). Patients with barbed sutures did not have an increased risk of complications compared with those who received smooth sutures (OR 1.67 (0.37-7.59), P = .51). Conclusions: In conclusion, performing implant-based breast reconstruction capsulorrhaphy with barbed sutures is a safe and effective procedure as compared with smooth sutures.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is widely used in patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Still, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is recommended for patients with any axillary residual disease after NAC. The necessity of ALND in patients with minimal axillary disease is unclear. We aim to investigate regional recurrence rates in patients with limited axillary residual disease after NAC underwent SLNB + image-tailored axillary surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: Patients with clinical stages were T1-3 and N1 at the time of diagnosis, clinically good or complete axillary response after NAC, and limited axillary residue (≤ 3 pathological lymph nodes) with favorable response to NAC in the final pathological examination were included in the study. All patients underwent SLNB + image-tailored axillary surgery. Peripheral lymphatic radiotherapy was applied, and no further surgery was performed in patients with compatible radiology and pathology results. RESULTS: Our study, which evaluated 139 patients with a median age of 47 years, found that the median number of excised lymph nodes was 4. Notably, 46% of patients had between 1 and 3 lymph nodes excised, while 45% had between 4 and 6. Only 9% of patients had ≥ 7 lymph nodes. 83(60%) of the patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS), and 56(40%) underwent mastectomy. The study's median follow-up period was 44 months. During this duration, one breast recurrence (0.7%), one supraclavicular recurrence (0.7%), and six systemic recurrences (4.3%) were observed. No axillary recurrence occurred within the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with pathological-suspicious ≤ 3 lymph nodes on imaging and showing a good response to NAC can be considered suitable candidates for SLNB + image-tailored axillary surgery, followed by adjuvant RT instead of ALND.
Asunto(s)
Axila , Neoplasias de la Mama , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasia Residual , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Neoplasia Residual/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Pronóstico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Metástasis Linfática , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This is a review of patients managed by our single-site breast surgery service for complications of cosmetic surgeries performed abroad and within the UK, across September 2022-2023. METHODS: A retrospective review of outpatient clinic and emergency theatre lists was used to identify patients; data was collected from their electronic records. RESULTS: 25 patients (23 female) were identified, 20 had surgery abroad. Turkey was the most common destination that patients travelled to (n = 15), with bilateral breast augmentation being the most common procedure (n = 15). Post-operative infection and wound dehiscence (n = 10 and n = 8, respectively) were the most common complications; 72% (n = 18) of patients presented within 8 weeks of their surgery. There was incomplete recording of surgical details including precise date (recorded for 48%), clinic name (8%), and name of the surgeon (0%). 17 microbiological samples were sent, with 11 resulting in a named organism - Staphylococcus aureus was most common (n = 5). 17 (68%) cases were treated conservatively, without radiological or surgical interventions. When surgical management occurred (n = 6), it was for removal of breast implants (n = 5) or evacuation of haematoma (n = 1). The cost of managing these complications was at least £37,000. CONCLUSION: Complications from cosmetic tourism present more commonly to the NHS than those resulting from private surgery performed in the UK. This has significant financial implications for the NHS. More accurate recording of relevant data, engagement in audits, and disseminating findings may help raise awareness of the risks and complications of cosmetic surgery performed abroad.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Autologous fat transfer (AFT) is increasingly used in breast reconstructive surgery. Due to post-surgical changes, in breast imaging after AFT, it can be challenging to differentiate between benign and suspicious findings. This systematic review aimed to present an overview of the literature on breast imaging after AFT-based breast reconstruction. The descriptive radiologic findings focus on different breast imaging modalities (i.e., mammography (MG), ultrasound (US), and breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)) to provide an overview of the most commonly reported benign and suspicious findings. Results: The literature search yielded 20 studies from 2006-2022 that reported AFT-based breast reconstructions and included the radiologic evaluation of the included breast imaging modalities. Only six of the 20 included studies provided qualitative descriptions of radiologic findings. Fat necrosis was most frequently reported. On MG, fat necrosis was described in a variety of stages such as oil cyst or cytosteatonecrosis with or without calcifications. On US, it was described as a nonvascular hypo- or anechoic mass, and on breast MRI, it was most frequently reported as hypointense homogenous architectural distortion. Additional biopsies to differentiate between benign and malignant findings after AFT-based breast reconstruction were reported in 13 of the 20 studies. Among all included studies in the current review, a total of 34 of 137 biopsies were considered malignant (24.8%). Conclusion: Qualitative descriptions of the reported radiologic findings after AFT for breast reconstruction were limited. Additional biopsies can be considered to differentiate between benign and suspicious findings. More experience and research are necessary to improve the interpretation of breast imaging after AFT-based breast reconstructions.
RESUMEN
Objective: To assess the accuracy, quality, and readability of patient-focused breast cancer websites using expert evaluation and validated tools. Background: Ensuring access to accurate, high-quality, and readable online health information supports informed decision-making and health equity but has not been recently evaluated. Methods: A qualitative analysis on 50 websites was conducted; the first 10 eligible websites for the following search terms were included: "breast cancer," "breast surgery," "breast reconstructive surgery," "breast chemotherapy," and "breast radiation therapy." Websites were required to be in English and not intended for healthcare professionals. Accuracy was evaluated by 5 breast cancer specialists. Quality was evaluated through the DISCERN questionnaire. Readability was measured using 9 standardized tests. Mean readability was compared with the American Medical Association and National Institutes of Health 6th grade recommendation. Results: Nonprofit hospital websites had the highest accuracy (mean = 4.06, SD = 0.42); however, no statistical differences were observed in accuracy by website affiliation (P = 0.08). The overall mean quality score was 50.8 ("fair"/"good" quality) with no significant differences among website affiliations (P = 0.10). Mean readability was at the 10th grade reading level, the lowest being for commercial websites with a mean 9th grade reading level (SD = 2.38). All websites exceeded the American Medical Association- and National Institutes of Health-recommended reading level by 4.4 levels (P < 0.001). Websites with higher accuracy tended to have lower readability levels, whereas those with lower accuracy had higher readability levels. Conclusion: As breast cancer treatment has become increasingly complex, improving online quality and readability while maintaining high accuracy is essential to promote health equity and empower patients to make informed decisions about their care.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among women, often necessitating surgical intervention. While surgeries like lumpectomy can be performed under local anesthesia, more extensive procedures typically require general anesthesia. Awake breast cancer surgery has emerged as an alternative due to risks associated with general anesthesia and patient preference. METHODS: This prospective observational study, conducted from July 2022 to July 2023, evaluated the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks for awake breast surgery. Patients aged 18-80 years undergoing unilateral breast surgery were included, following ethical committee approval and written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were prior breast surgery, coagulopathies, infections, allergies to local anesthetics, psychiatric disorders, body mass index over 40 kg/m², and chest deformities. The combination of interpectoral, pecto-serratus, and deep serratus plane blocks was used as the primary anesthetic method, with a superficial parasternal block added in cases where complete cutaneous coverage was not achieved. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled. The primary outcome, sufficient surgical anesthesia without deep sedation, was achieved in 15 patients. The combination of the aforementioned blocks proved effective, with an average surgery duration of 59.66 min, and propofol requirements averaging 1.77 mg/kg/hour. Most patients reported high satisfaction levels, and no early or late block-related complications were observed. CONCLUSION: The combination of fascial plane blocks is a viable option for awake breast cancer surgery, potentially eliminating the need for more invasive anesthesia techniques. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings in larger, homogeneous patient groups.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Bloqueo Nervioso , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Anciano , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Adulto , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual , Vigilia , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Satisfacción del PacienteRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is an uncommon soft tissue tumor which generally affects people from the second to the fifth decades of life, with the same incidence in both sexes. DFSP can appear as a slow-growing, flesh-colored or erythematous plaque or nodule, often becoming protuberant if untreated. CASE PRESENTATION: We report two cases of DFSP. The first case regards a 22-year-old woman with a 1.5-centimeter, mobile nodule of hard-elastic consistency in the left breast initially suspected to be a sebaceous cyst. Ultrasound and MRI suggested benign features, but histopathological examination post-excision confirmed DFSP. The second patient come to our attention is a 54-year-old woman with a 6 mm erythematous lump in the right breast, which reached 22 mm after two years. Mammography and histological examination post-excision confirmed DFSP. Both patients underwent to wide local excision and after four years of follow-up no recurrence or complications are observed. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: DFSP is a soft tissue sarcoma with low metastatic potential but requires early diagnosis and surgical excision to avoid malignant transformation. There are no standardized guidelines for its diagnosis and treatment. Imaging techniques, including ultrasound, CT, and MRI, are crucial to define tumor extension and planning surgical intervention. Surgical excision with clear margins is the primary treatment, but there are also emerging treatments as Mohs micrographic surgery or Imatinib Mesylate therapy for unresectable cases. CONCLUSION: Our cases highlight the importance of an accurate diagnostic evaluation and effective surgical management to achieve favorable outcomes.
RESUMEN
Background/Aim: This study examined the influence of preoperative MRI on the choice of implant volume in patients undergoing subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. It was postulated that preoperative MRI scans can adequately estimate glandular tissue, which in turn correlates with implant size. Patients and Methods: Preoperative and postoperative MRI scans were used in oncological and prophylactical subcutaneous mastectomy scenarios in 67 cases at the Department of Gynaecology, Breast Cancer Center, University of Cologne, Germany. The preoperative MRI was used to estimate the resected tissue and the postoperative MRI was used to scan for residual glandular tissue. In addition, a correlation found by Malter et al. in 2021 was evaluated with the available data. Results: Preoperative MRIs result in an adequate estimation of resected tissue. This in turn correlates with implant volume. The correlation by Malter et al. also holds when estimating implant volume. The likelihood of residual gland was low if the preoperatively estimate volume was removed. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the use of preoperative and postoperative MRI scans for subcutaneous mastectomies is advantageous. We suggest a routine estimation of glandular tissue, especially for small breasts.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Given the high incidence rate of breast cancer and shortage of fellowship trained specialists, general surgeons are frequently responsible for these patients. Residents have less operative exposure to breast surgery due to duty hour restrictions and decreased resident autonomy. We created a curriculum using human donors designed to teach junior residents to perform breast lumpectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsies. METHODS: All eighteen junior surgery residents were invited. We chose fresh human donors to represent tissue planes more accurately. We inserted Savi Scout reflectors (Merit Oncology, Inc) in each breast for tumor localization. An olive pit plus 1 mL of methylene blue was inserted in the axilla for SLN identification. In session 1, attendings discussed proper technique and residents performed the procedures and received feedback. In session 2 after 2 mo, residents performed the same operation without any guidance. They were graded on technique during both sessions and filled out a postsession survey to gauge confidence. RESULTS: Seven PGY1 and six PGY2 residents participated. Half of the respondents strongly felt this session improved their understanding of lumpectomies, sentinel lymph node biopsies, and axillary anatomy. Most felt strongly that their skills improved and these skills were transferable to the operating room. In attending evaluations, PGY1 residents significantly improved in all aspects of the procedures; PGY2 residents showed nonstatistical significant improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Residents find these sessions helpful in learning anatomy, improving confidence and efficiency, and facilitating skill acquisition that is transferable to the operating room. We believe this approach should be considered in general surgery training programs.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews (SR) of randomized controlled trials on esthetics and reconstructive breast surgery. METHODS: Meta-research study with a broad search strategy was developed to retrieve all relevant systematic reviews. We evaluated the methodological and reporting guidance adopted by these reviews and assessed their adequacy to items from AMSTAR-2 (methodological quality) and PRISMA 2020 (reporting quality). The protocol of this study was prospectively published in: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/ucpgd. RESULTS: After the selection process, 15 SR were included; eight (60%) referred the use of a methodological guide and five (33.3%) invertedly referred PRISMA as the methodological guide. Reporting guidelines were referred by none of the included systematic review. The median adequacy to PRISMA-2020 items was 42.9% (Q1 - 38.1%/Q3 - 95.2%) and to AMSTAR-2 items was 33.3% (Q1 - 23.3%/Q3 - 93.3%) which reflects overall low reporting and methodological quality of included SR. The overall confidence in the results using AMSTAR-2 framework was critically low in 73.3% of included SR. Although a small number of SR were included, a high correlation between the methodological and reporting quality was observed (Spearmean rho = 0.96, 95% bias-corrected confidence interval = 0.84 to 0.99). CONCLUSION: Methodological and reposting quality of SR of randomized clinical trials on esthetic or reconstructive breast surgery is poor. Half of the authors referred to the use of valid guidance to plan and conduct their reviews and none of them referred the use of a guidance for reporting their results.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer and its treatments can have a marked impact on the patient health-related quality of life. The aim of this study was to produce and validate Finnish versions of the breast-conserving treatment, mastectomy and breast reconstruction modules of the BREAST-Q, a patient-reported outcome tool designed specifically for women undergoing treatment for breast cancer. METHODS: The relevant BREAST-Q modules were translated to Finnish according to established guidelines. Altogether 777 preoperative women were recruited at the Breast Surgery Unit and the Plastic Surgery Unit of Helsinki University Hospital between December 2019 and March 2021. This included 541 patients scheduled for breast-conserving surgery, 86 for mastectomy, and 150 for breast reconstruction. Postoperative patients were recruited through a postal survey, approaching 500 women operated for breast cancer in 2017, including 250 women who had undergone breast-conserving surgery and 250 women who had undergone mastectomy, as well as 339 women who had undergone breast reconstruction between August 2017 and July 2019. The patients were invited to fill the BREAST-Q modules relevant to their treatment and the general health-related quality-of-life instrument SF-36. A repeat administration of the BREAST-Q was done 2 weeks later. RESULTS: A total of 665 (41%) women participated in the study, 339 (44%) preoperatively and 326 (39%) postoperatively. The BREAST-Q subscales showed high internal consistency with most Cronbach's alphas > 0.8. The repeatability of the subscales was excellent with most intra-class correlation coefficients > 0.75. Low or negligible correlation was observed between BREAST-Q subscales and SF-36 domains. CONCLUSIONS: The Finnish version of the BREAST-Q modules breast-conserving treatment, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction performs well in assessing the health-related quality of life of women undergoing surgery for breast cancer or breast reconstruction.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard procedure for patients with clinically assessed negative axillary lymph nodes (cN0) during early-stage breast cancer (EBC). However, the majority of EBC patients have a negative pathological confirmation of the sentinel lymph node (SLN), and axillary surgery is inevitably associated with postoperative complications. Considering that SLNB has no therapeutic benefit, this trial aims to determine the safety of omitting SLNB in patients with cN0 early invasive breast cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The OMSLNB trial is a prospective, single-arm, non-inferiority, phase II, open-label study design involving female breast cancer patients with a tumor of ≤3 cm in diameter, who are considered axillary lymph-node-negative based on two or more radiological examinations, including axillary lymph node ultrasonography. Eligible patients will avoid axillary surgery but will undergo breast surgery, which is not limited to breast-conserving surgery. The trial begins in 2023 and is scheduled to end in 2027. The primary endpoint is 3 year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). The secondary endpoints include the incidence of breast cancer-related lymphoedema, patient-reported outcomes, locoregional recurrence, local recurrence and regional recurrence. It is expected that the 3 year iDFS in patients undergoing SLNB is about 90%, combined with a non-inferiority cut-off of 5%, 80% power, 95% CIs, 0.05 test level, and 10% loss to follow-up rate, the planned enrollment is 311 patients. All enrolled patients will be included in the intention-to-treat analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (No.2023-SR-193). All participants must provide written informed consent to be eligible. The protocol will be described in a peer-reviewed manuscript, and the results will be published in scientific journals and/or at academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05935150.