Mining and evaluation of adverse event signals for capmatinib based on the FAERS database.

Objective: To conduct a comprehensive data analysis based on the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to mine possible adverse event (AE) signals of Capmatinib, providing valuable references for its clinical application. Methods: Capmatinib was the primary suspected drug in the search of FAERS database from the second quarter of 2020 to the fourth quarter of 2023. Data processing, screening, and classification were performed using methods such as the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma Poisson Shrinker (MGPS). Results: A total of 1,991 AE reports directly related to Capmatinib were screened, identifying 269 Preferred Terms (PTs) involving 26 System Organ Classes (SOCs). Besides the AEs recorded in the drug label (such as edema, nausea, fatigue, and dyspnea), the study unearthed other high-risk AEs not listed in the label, including Renal and urinary disorders, Vocal cord paralysis, and Ear and labyrinth disorders. Among these, renal and urinary disorders, and ear and labyrinth disorders had a higher frequency and intensity of signals, suggesting that their mechanisms of occurrence could be a future research direction. Conclusion: This study uncovered new potential AEs of Capmatinib based on the FAERS database, providing reference for its safe clinical use. Special attention should be given to the occurrence of ear and labyrinth disorders and renal and urinary disorders, primarily presenting as pseudo-acute kidney injury, during treatment.

Targeted and cytotoxic inhibitors used in the treatment of lung cancers.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States and the world. It is divided into two major types: small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) cancer-staging classification system (Stages I/II/III/IV), the severity of neoplastic growth is characterized by the size of the tumor (T1 to T4), the extent of lymph node involvement (N0 to N3), and whether (M1) or not (M0) distant metastasis has occurred. Surgery is the treatment of choice for medically fit patients with Stage I/II NSCLC. Combination chemoradiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy are used across all NSCLC types. Oncogene-addicted tumors with sensitizing EGFR or BRAF mutations or activating ALK, ROS1 or NTRK translocations are treated with their cognate orally active small molecule protein kinase blockers. On the order of 20 % of NSCLCs bear activating mutations in EGFR and are treated with osimertinib and other kinase antagonists. SCLC, which accounts for approximately 15 % of lung cancer cases, is a deadly high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma with a poor prognosis. Limited-stage SCLC is confined to one hemi-thorax and one radiation port and extensive-stage disease signifies those cancers that do not meet the criteria for limited-stage disease. Local treatment options to control thoracic disease include radiotherapy and surgery. In patients with extensive-stage disease, a platinum agent (cisplatin or carboplatin) combined with etoposide and an anti-PDL1 inhibitor (atezolizumab or durvalumab) for four cycles followed by anti-PDL1 maintenance therapy is the recommended first-line regimen.

Functional interaction between receptor tyrosine kinase MET and ETS transcription factors promotes prostate cancer progression.

Prostate cancer, the most common malignancy in men, has a relatively favourable prognosis. However, when it spreads to the bone, the survival rate drops dramatically. The development of bone metastases leaves patients with aggressive prostate cancer, the leading cause of death in men. Moreover, bone metastases are incurable and very painful. Hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET) and fusion of genes encoding E26 transformation-specific (ETS) transcription factors are both involved in the progression of the disease. ETS gene fusions, in particular, have the ability to induce the migratory and invasive properties of prostate cancer cells, whereas MET receptor, through its signalling cascades, is able to activate transcription factor expression. MET signalling and ETS gene fusions are intimately linked to high-grade prostate cancer. However, the collaboration of these factors in prostate cancer progression has not yet been investigated. Here, we show, using cell models of advanced prostate cancer, that ETS translocation variant 1 (ETV1) and transcriptional regulator ERG (ERG) transcription factors (members of the ETS family) promote tumour properties, and that activation of MET signalling enhances these effects. By using a specific MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor in a humanised hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) mouse model, we also establish that MET activity is required for ETV1/ERG-mediated tumour growth. Finally, by performing a comparative transcriptomic analysis, we identify target genes that could play a relevant role in these cellular processes. Thus, our results demonstrate for the first time in prostate cancer models a functional interaction between ETS transcription factors (ETV1 and ERG) and MET signalling that confers more aggressive properties and highlight a molecular signature characteristic of this combined action.

Capmatinib efficacy for METex14 non-small cell lung cancer patients: Results of the IFCT-2104 CAPMATU study.

BACKGROUND: Capmatinib is a selective MET inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in a phase II study of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring METex14 mutations. However, the real-world outcomes of capmatinib are largely unknown. From June 2019, the French Early Access Program (EAP) provided capmatinib to METex14 NSCLC patients who were ineligible for or for whom first-line standard therapies had failed. METHODS: IFCT-2104 CAPMATU was a multicenter study that included all METex14 NSCLC patients who received capmatinib as part of the EAP until August 2021. The primary endpoints were time to treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: A total of 146 patients were included. The median age was 74.9 years, 56.6 % were never-smokers, and 32.4 % had brain metastases. The median TTF, median PFS and median OS from capmatinib initiation were 5.1 months (95 % CI 4.2-6.0), 4.8 months (95 % CI 4.0-6.0) and 10.4 months (95 % CI 8.3-13.2), respectively. Evaluation of the best response to capmatinib was available for 134 patients and resulted in an ORR of 55.3 % (95 % CI 46.8 %-63.6 %). The median PFS was 7.7 months for treatment-naïve patients and 6.0 and 4.1 months for patients who had received one or 2 + prior lines of treatment, respectively. For patients with brain metastases, the median PFS was 3.0 months. Capmatinib had a known and manageable safety profile, with grade 3 to 4 adverse events, mostly peripheral edema (8.2 %), occurring in 17.8 % of patients. CONCLUSION: In this large real-world study of METex14 NSCLC patients, the efficacy of capmatinib was confirmed, with a manageable safety profile, even in patients with brain metastases and in those who received several lines of treatment. This study reinforces the key role of capmatinib for these patients.

Current Trial Report: A Multicenter Phase I/Ib study of Capmatinib Plus Trametinib in Patients With Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Center Harboring MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations and Other MET-Alterations.

INTRODUCTION: MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is associated with improved outcomes in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a MET alteration, including MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutation, MET amplification, or MET fusion. However, primary or acquired resistance to TKI therapy ultimately develops. In preclinical models, hyperactivation of MAPK signaling was shown to promote resistance to MET TKI; resistance was overcome by co-treatment with a MET inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor. This phase I/Ib study offers a potential combination strategy simultaneously targeting MET (with capmatinib) and MEK signaling (with trametinib) to overcome resistance to MET inhibitor monotherapy in METex14 NSCLC. METHODS: In the dose escalation phase, a minimum of 6 and maximum of 18 patients will be enrolled using a conventional 3+3 design with the primary endpoint of identifying a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of capmatinib in combination with trametinib. Once the RP2D is identified, patients will continue to enroll in a dose expansion phase to a total of 15 patients. The primary endpoint of the dose expansion phase is to further characterize the safety profile of the combination. CONCLUSION: This phase I/Ib clinical trial will assess the safety and efficacy of combination capmatinib and trametinib in NSCLC patients whose tumors harbor METex14 skipping mutations, MET amplification, or MET fusion and had developed progressive disease on single agent MET inhibitor therapy.

Intracranial response to capmatinib after progression on crizotinib in a patient with MET exon 14 skipping non-small cell lung cancer-a case report.

Background: Capmatinib, a potent and selective MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), holds promise as a therapeutic agent due to its potentially elevated intracranial efficacy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring exon 14 skipping alterations in MET (MET Proto-Oncogene). This study aims to evaluate a targeted therapeutic approach to an MET exon 14 skipping (METex14) advanced NSCLC patient that progressed on Crizotinib and developed off target resistance alteration in PIK3CA. Case Discription: We present a case of advanced METex14 NSCLC patient wherein central nervous system (CNS) relapse occurred post complete surgical resection and remission of the lung tumor under first-line crizotinib treatment. Subsequent disease monitoring demonstrated a profound intracranial response to capmatinib in a crizotinib-resistant brain lesion. Molecular analysis unveiled the original METex14 D1028N driver mutation and a newly arisen PIK3CA bypass mutation, potentially contributing to off-target resistance. Conclusions: Before capmatinib was approved as a first line treatment option for metastatic NSCLC harboring somatic METex14 mutations, crizotinib conferred a potential option for targeted treatment. Switching to a selective MET-TKI like capmatinib with a better CNS penetration, it appears to be a promising approach for CNS metastasized NSCLC patients with METex14 mutations that failed on crizotinib. Further research is needed to more effectively understand and monitor resistance mechanisms using advanced diagnostic techniques such as DNA-based hybrid-capture (HC) next generation sequencing (NGS) to guide molecularly stratified therapy beyond the first line setting.

Synchronous Double Primary Lung Adenocarcinomas With EGFR L858R Point Mutation and MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation.

Various driver mutations and the corresponding molecular-targeted drugs have been detected and developed in non-small cell lung cancer. There were many cases in which surgical specimens had happened to find double primary cancers. However, to our knowledge, our case was the first report of synchronous double primary lung adenocarcinomas harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) L858R and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping mutations. A 75-year-old Japanese woman with chronic heart and renal failures was referred to our department because of a growing nodule in the right upper lung field on chest X-ray films. Chest computed tomography (CT) detected a nodule in the right S1 and another nodule in the left S1+2. Bronchoscopic biopsy diagnosed the right S1 nodule as moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Oncomine Dx Target Test Multi-CDx system of the right S1 adenocarcinoma detected EGFR L858R mutation. The 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT showed abnormal uptakes both in the right S1 and the left S1+2 nodules, and in the bilateral inferior paratracheal lymph nodes. We made a diagnosis of c-stage IIIA (cT1bN2M0) of adenocarcinoma in the right S1 and suspected another primary lung cancer in the left S1+2. Considering her general conditions, comorbidities and wishes, we started osimertinib. The right S1 cancer achieved partial response (PR), while the left S1+2 nodule and lymph nodes enlarged. Aspiration cytology from the left supraclavicular lymph node showed adenocarcinoma. The FoundationOne® Liquid CDx tumor profiling test detected not only EGFR L858R, but also MET exon 14 skipping mutation. We made a diagnosis of another primary adenocarcinoma from the left S1+2 nodule (cT1bN3M0, c-stage IIIB) with MET mutation, and changed osimertinib to capmatinib. Although the left S1+2 cancer achieved and maintained PR by capmatinib, the right S1 cancer increased, and several new metastases appeared. The subsequent switch from capmatinib to osimertinib could not control cancers. In this case, we tried to switch monotherapies from osimertinib to capmatinib for double primary adenocarcinomas harboring different two driver mutations, according to each cancer progression. The temporal and spatial heterogeneity reinforces the need for primary tissue biopsy if dual primaries are suspected. Temporally distinct liquid biopsies, not standard at present, may be considered.

MET exon 14 skipping mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: real-world data from the Italian biomarker ATLAS database.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutation is a rare alteration in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring in about 3%-4% of cases. Here we report disease and patient characteristics, and efficacy and tolerability of MET inhibitors among advanced METex14 NSCLC patients from the Italian real-world registry ATLAS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical-pathological and molecular data, and treatment efficacy/tolerability outcomes were retrospectively collected from the ATLAS registry. RESULTS: From July 2020 to July 2023 a total of 146 METex14 advanced NSCLC patients were included across 27 Italian centers. Median age was 74 years, and most patients were male (52%), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < 2 (72%) and adenocarcinoma subtype (83%). One hundred and twenty-five out of 146 (86%) patients received at least one line of systemic anticancer therapy. Fifty-six (38%) were treated with capmatinib and 34 (23%) with tepotinib. 29% and 52% of them received targeted treatment in the first and second line, respectively. In the cohort of patients treated with MET inhibitors, the response rate (RR) was 37% (33% in previously treated patients and 46% in treatment-naïve) with a disease control rate of 62%. With a median follow-up of 10.8 months, progression-free survival was 6.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-8.3 months] and overall survival was 10.7 months (95% CI 7.2-19.3 months). In patients with measurable brain metastases (17 cases), the intracranial RR was 41%. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 12% of patients with grade 3 peripheral edema in 7% of cases. A fatal adverse reaction occurred in one patient due to pneumonitis. TRAEs-related dose reduction and discontinuation were reported in 6% and 8% of cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Capmatinib and tepotinib represent an effective treatment option in NSCLC patients with METex14. Real-world efficacy outcomes are worse than those reported in prospective clinical trials. Their activity is more pronounced in the treatment-naïve population, suggesting that this is the right setting in the management of patients with METex14.

Efficacy and tolerability of capmatinib in a very elderly patient with metastatic NSCLC harboring a MET exon 14 mutation.

We report the case of an 87-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation (MET ex14) and PD-L1 expression of 60%. A first-line treatment with atezolizumab was started with primary resistance. Then, a second-line treatment with capmatinib, a selective type Ib MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was started, achieving a partial response. The patient is still alive and on treatment with capmatinib 300 mg twice daily after 20 months, with a good tolerability and no evidence of disease progression.In summary, our patient experienced a long-lasting response (>18 months) with capmatinib as second-line treatment. Further analyses evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors are warranted, especially in the elderly, a non-small-cell lung cancer population whose tumors could more frequently harbor MET ex14 mutation.

[Box: see text].

Remarkable response to capmatinib in a patient with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring TFG-MET fusion.

Dysregulation of mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) gene due to amplification, mutation, and fusion has been reported in various types of human cancers. Recently, the efficacy of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting MET has been demonstrated in a wide range of MET-dysregulated tumors. The majority of biliary tract cancers including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and the utility of conventional chemotherapy is limited. Here, we present a case of metastatic iCCA harboring TFG-MET gene fusion, which demonstrated a remarkable response to treatment with capmatinib, a selective MET inhibitor. The patient was a 46-year-old man diagnosed with iCCA with hepatic, intraabdominal lymph nodes, and peritoneal metastases. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) revealed TFG-MET gene fusion in his tumor. After becoming refractory to standard chemotherapy, he received capmatinib, which resulted in a marked shrinkage of the liver masses and lymph node metastases, as well as a drastic decrease in serum CA19-9 level. Our case reinforces the importance of CGP in exploring targeted therapy and supports the potential role of capmatinib in the treatment of tumors harboring MET fusions.

Targeted cancer therapy: the initial high concentration may slow down the selection for resistance.

Unfortunately, any targeted therapy is, always, started with low levels of the drug in the organism, selecting for drug resistance. One should propose that initial drug levels must be maximized, and durations may be minimized, ideally, as portions of preemptive combination of targeted drugs.

Capmatinib plus nazartinib in patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase 1b/2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of capmatinib plus nazartinib in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In phase 1b, patients with progression on first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs received escalating doses of capmatinib 200-400 mg bid plus nazartinib 50-150 mg qd. Once the MTD/RP2D was declared, phase 2 commenced with patient enrollment into groups according to mutation status and prior lines of treatment: group 1 (fasted; EGFR-TKI resistant; 1-3 prior lines; EGFRL858R/ex19del; any T790M/MET); group 2 (fasted; EGFR-TKI naïve; 0-2 prior lines; de novo T790M+; any MET); group 3 (fasted; treatment-naïve; EGFRL858R/ex19del; T790M-; any MET); group 4 (with food; 0-2 prior lines; EGFRL858R/ex19del; any T790M/MET). Primary endpoints in phase 2 were investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 (groups 1-3), safety, and tolerability of the combination with food (group 4). Efficacy was assessed by T790M and MET status for a subgroup of patients. RESULTS: The RP2D was capmatinib 400 mg bid plus nazartinib 100 mg qd. In phase 2 (n = 144), the ORR was 28.8 %, 33.3 %, 61.7 %, and 42.9 % in groups 1 (n = 52), 2 (n = 3), 3 (n = 47), and 4 (n = 42), respectively. In group 1 +phase 1b RP2D, the ORR was 45.8 %, 26.2 %, 37.9 %, and 32.4 % in MET+ (n = 24), MET- (n = 42), T790M+ (n = 29), and T790M- (n = 34) patients. Most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (≥25 %; n = 144) were peripheral edema (54.9 %), nausea (41.7 %), diarrhea (34.0 %), and maculopapular rash (25.0 %). CONCLUSION: Capmatinib plus nazartinib showed antitumor activity in patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The overall safety profile was acceptable. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02335944.

A novel disposable ultrasensitive sensor based on nanosized ceria uniformly loaded carbon nanofiber nanoceramic film wrapped on pencil graphite rods for electrocatalytic monitoring of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor capmatinib.

For the first time, we introduce a novel disposable and ultrasensitive sensing electrode made up of nanosized ceria uniformly loaded carbon nanofibers (CeNPs@CNF) sol-gel nanoceramic film (CF) wrapped on eco-friendly and inexpensive pencil graphite rods (PGRs) to explore their electro-catalytic detection of the anticancer drug capmatinib (CMB). The as-prepared CeNPs@CNF hybrid nanocomposite was described by XRD, SEM, TEM, HRTEM, and EDX analysis. The CV study clearly demonstrated that, the disposable CeNPs@CNF-CF/PGRE sensor exhibited excellent redox activities in the ideal probe [Fe(CN)6]3-/4-. Due to the outstanding electrochemical properties, larger electrochemically active surface area, and tremendous electro-catalytic activity of CeNPs@CNF, the reduction current of CMB on the CeNPs@CNF-CF/PGRE sensor is considerably higher than that of bare PGRE. The detection conditions, such as supporting electrolyte, pH of the buffer solution, amount of modifier, adsorption potential, and time, were studied and optimized. The sensing platform demonstrated high sensitivity (1.2 µA nM-1 cm-2), an ultralow detection limit (0.6 nM), and a wide linear range of 2.0 nM-400 nM of CMB compared to the bare PGRE. Additionally, the CeNPs@CNF-CF/PGRE sensor showed high selectivity, stability, and simple operation, which provided a promising alternative tool for fast detection of CMB in human body fluids with good recoveries.

Complete response to capmatinib in a patient with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma harboring CD47-MET fusion: a case report.

Comprehensive genomic profiling is highly recommended for treatment decision in nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, rare genomic alterations are still being unveiled, with scarce data to guide therapy. Herein, we describe the treatment journey of a 56-year-old, never-smoker Caucasian woman with a metastatic NSCLC harboring a CD47-MET fusion, initially classified as a variant of unknown significance. She had undergone 3 lines of therapy over the course of 3 years, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and anti-angiogenic therapy. After reanalysis of her next-generation sequencing data in our service, the fusion was reclassified as likely oncogenic. The patient was started with fourth-line capmatinib, with a good tolerance so far and a complete metabolic response in the active sites of disease, currently ongoing for 18 months. In conclusion, we highlight the sensitivity of a novel MET fusion to capmatinib and emphasize the need for comprehensive panels in NSCLC and molecular tumor board discussions with specialized centers when rare findings arise.

Indirect comparison of capmatinib treatment from GEOMETRY mono-1 trial to SOC in German patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring METex14 skipping mutations.

BACKGROUND: This study provides comparative evidence of the selective MET inhibitor capmatinib versus standard of care (SOC) in first-line (1 L) and second-line (2 L) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with METex14 mutations in German routine care. METHODS: SOC data were collected from German routine care via retrospective chart review. Analyses were conducted as naive and propensity score adjusted (PSA) comparisons to capmatinib-treated patients within the GEOMETRY mono-1 trial. Effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), time to CNS progression (CNSprog), and exploratory safety endpoints. RESULTS: The SOC arm included 119 patients in 1 L and 46 in 2 L versus 60 patients in 1 L and 81 in 2 L treated with capmatinib, with balanced baseline characteristics after PSA. In 1 L, the naive comparison showed a significant benefit of capmatinib versus SOC for OS (median: 25.49 vs 14.59 months; HR 0.58; 95 % CI 0.39-0.87; P = 0.011), PFS (median: 12.45 vs 5.03 months; HR: 0.44; 95 % CI: 0.31-0.63; P < 0.001), and ORR (event rate: 68.3 vs 26.9 %; RR 2.54; 95 % CI 1.80-3.58; P < 0.001). In 2 L, OS, PFS, and ORR showed positive trends favoring capmatinib over SOC. Capmatinib treatment in the 1 L and 2 L led to significant benefit in CNSprog. PSA analyses showed consistent results to naive analysis. Exploratory safety endpoints indicated a manageable safety profile for capmatinib. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the important role of capmatinib in providing robust clinically meaningful benefit to patients with NSCLC harboring METex14 mutations and its significant role in preventing the development of brain metastases.

Capmatinib is an effective treatment for MET-fusion driven pediatric high-grade glioma and synergizes with radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric-type diffuse high-grade glioma (pHGG) is the most frequent malignant brain tumor in children and can be subclassified into multiple entities. Fusion genes activating the MET receptor tyrosine kinase often occur in infant-type hemispheric glioma (IHG) but also in other pHGG and are associated with devastating morbidity and mortality. METHODS: To identify new treatment options, we established and characterized two novel orthotopic mouse models harboring distinct MET fusions. These included an immunocompetent, murine allograft model and patient-derived orthotopic xenografts (PDOX) from a MET-fusion IHG patient who failed conventional therapy and targeted therapy with cabozantinib. With these models, we analyzed the efficacy and pharmacokinetic properties of three MET inhibitors, capmatinib, crizotinib and cabozantinib, alone or combined with radiotherapy. RESULTS: Capmatinib showed superior brain pharmacokinetic properties and greater in vitro and in vivo efficacy than cabozantinib or crizotinib in both models. The PDOX models recapitulated the poor efficacy of cabozantinib experienced by the patient. In contrast, capmatinib extended survival and induced long-term progression-free survival when combined with radiotherapy in two complementary mouse models. Capmatinib treatment increased radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks and delayed their repair. CONCLUSIONS: We comprehensively investigated the combination of MET inhibition and radiotherapy as a novel treatment option for MET-driven pHGG. Our seminal preclinical data package includes pharmacokinetic characterization, recapitulation of clinical outcomes, coinciding results from multiple complementing in vivo studies, and insights into molecular mechanism underlying increased efficacy. Taken together, we demonstrate the groundbreaking efficacy of capmatinib and radiation as a highly promising concept for future clinical trials.

Effective treatment of MET exon 14 skipping mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer using capmatinib following serious maculopapular rash caused by two MET inhibitors: a case report.

Background: Multi-gene panel testing and advancements in molecular targeted therapy have improved the overall survival of patients with driver mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) exon 14 skipping mutation-positive NSCLC, which remains untreated with MET inhibitors, shows a poorer prognosis than do cases of NSCLC without MET mutations. However, serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) act as substantial treatment barriers. Case Description: Herein, we report a case of advanced NSCLC in a male in his 40s with MET exon 14 skipping mutation. A MET-inhibitory investigational drug was administered as first-line treatment; the development of grade 3 maculopapular rash necessitated dose reduction, which resulted in disease progression. Tepotinib was then administered with dexamethasone as a third-line treatment but was discontinued owing to the re-development of the grade 3 maculopapular rash. Finally, capmatinib administration as the fifth-line treatment appeared partially effective, with no serious adverse events. The patient could successfully resume work. Conclusions: This is the first report of MET exon 14 skipping mutation-positive NSCLC wherein partial response was achieved without severe TRAEs by alternating between two MET inhibitors. If no alternative treatments are available, cautious repeated re-administration of MET inhibitors after resolving serious rashes can be considered a potential approach.

Unfavorable response to capmatinib for MET exon14 skipping after first-line osimertinib in a patient with EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma: A case report and literature review.

MET exon14 skipping mutations (METex14s) are rarely reported as a potential resistance mechanism to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The efficacy of targeted therapy against METex14s emerging after osimertinib resistance is uncertain. Herein, we report a case of EGFR-mutated metastatic lung adenocarcinoma in which METex14 was detected in a re-biopsy upon first-line osimertinib resistance. The patient received capmatinib monotherapy as third-line therapy, which was ineffective, followed by an exceptional response to salvage therapy with afatinib. This report highlights the heterogeneity of EGFR-TKI resistance and that targeting rare resistance mechanisms remains challenging.

Capmatinib plus nivolumab in pretreated patients with EGFR wild-type advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Dysregulated MET is an established oncogenic driver in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MET signaling may also suppress anticancer immune responses. Concomitant MET inhibition with capmatinib (a MET inhibitor) synergistically enhanced the efficacy of immunotherapies in murine cancer models, regardless of tumor dependency to MET signaling. Here, we report results of a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study of capmatinib plus nivolumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) in patients with EGFR wild-type advanced NSCLC, previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients were allocated into high-MET or low-MET groups according to MET expression determined by immunohistochemistry, MET gene copy number as assessed by fluorescence in-situ hybridization, and presence of MET exon 14 skipping mutation, then received capmatinib 400 mg, oral, twice daily in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate per RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was met in both the high-MET (N = 16) and low-MET (N = 30) groups. In the high-MET and low-MET groups, respectively, the estimated mean 6-month PFS rate (95 % credible interval) by Bayesian analysis was 68.9 % (48.5-85.7) and 50.9 % (35.6-66.4). The Kaplan-Meier median PFS (95 % CI) was 6.2 months (3.5-19.2) and 4.2 months (1.8-7.4). The overall response rate (95 % CI) was 25.0 % (7.3-52.4) and 16.7 % (5.6-34.7). Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (≥30 % any grade, N = 46) were nausea (52.2 %), peripheral edema (34.8 %), and increased blood creatinine (30.4 %). CONCLUSIONS: Capmatinib plus nivolumab showed clinical activity and manageable safety in pretreated patients with advanced EGFR wild-type NSCLC, independent of MET status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02323126.