Cladribine tablets in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis preferentially target B-cells.

Recent studies demonstrate the efficacy of B cell-targeting therapies in managing multiple sclerosis (MS) activity, emphasizing the critical role of B cells in MS pathogenesis. CladB study aimed to quantify the temporal changes in peripheral immune cells and their activity over 96 weeks of Cladribine tablets (CladT) treatment in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Ten participants (3 males, 7 females) had blood samples collected at multiple intervals (Day 0, 1, 5, then weekly for 8 weeks, biweekly for up to 24 weeks, and monthly for up to 96 weeks) for immune cell analysis, compared to a historical alemtuzumab-treated cohort. Paired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was also taken for various analyses, alongside clinical and brain imaging assessments. CladT depleted memory B cells, while alemtuzumab rapidly depleted T and B cells. The кFLC index decreased from 164.5 ± 227.1 to 71.3 ± 84.7 at 48 weeks (p = 0.002) and to 64.4 ± 67.3 at 96 weeks (p = 0.01). The IgG index dropped from 1.1 ± 0.5 at baseline to 0.8 ± 0.4 at 48 weeks (p = 0.014) and to 0.8 ± 0.3 at 96 weeks (p = 0.02). CSF CXCL-13 decreased from 88.6 ± 68.4 pg/mL to 39.4 ± 35.2 pg/mL at 48 weeks (p = 0.037) and 19.1 ± 11.7 pg/mL at 96 weeks (p = 0.027). CSF NfL levels were reduced at 48 weeks (p = 0.01). CladT primarily depletes memory B cells and antibody-secreting cell precursors in RRMS, leading to sustained effects on intrathecal antibody production and total IgG, and a reduction in CSF CXCL-13.

Harmonized Data Quality Indicators Maintain Data Quality in Long-Term Safety Studies Using Multiple Sclerosis Registries/Data Sources: Experience from the CLARION Study.

Purpose: Understanding the long-term safety of disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) in routine clinical practice can be undertaken through registry-based studies. However, variability of data quality across such sources poses the challenge of data fit for regulatory decision-making. CLARION, a non-interventional cohort safety study of cladribine tablets, combines aggregated data from MS registries/data sources, except in Germany (which utilizes primary data collection). We describe the application of key data quality indicators (DQIs) within CLARION to evaluate data quality over time, as recommended by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) guideline on registry-based studies. Methods: DQIs were defined with participating registries/sources; they were used to assess data quality according to the EMA Data Quality Framework, addressing consistency, accuracy, completeness, and study representativeness. DQIs were associated with potential remedial measures if data quality was not met. DQIs were summarized overall and for individual MS registries/data sources to November 1, 2022. Results: A total of 28 DQIs were analyzed using data from 5069 patients arising from eight MS registries/data sources and 14 countries. The Representativeness DQIs showed that 72.0% of patients were female, median age at MS diagnosis was 29.0 to 43.3 years, and 93.5% had relapsing-remitting MS. Consistency DQIs showed a total of 2899 patients had achieved at least two years of follow-up; 6.9% did not have any recorded visits during this timeframe. Discrepant values were assessed as part of Accuracy DQIs, and improvements over time were noted for recorded dates of MS onset and diagnosis. Regarding Completeness DQIs, 191/5069 (3.8%) patients were lost to follow-up. Conclusion: The application of 28 DQIs within the CLARION study has helped with understanding, not only intrinsic and question-specific determinants of data quality, but also tracking the quality of post-authorization safety data obtained from MS registries/data sources, thereby providing a foundation for the regulatory decision-making process.

Cladribine use trend in Latin America: the changes in patient profile impact in the drug effectiveness.

INTRODUCTION: Cladribine was approved for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) in our country in 2018. A previous study by our group showed that its use among high efficacy therapies options has been increasing along the years. OBJECTIVE: to analyze the cladribine use trend across time since its approval. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was performed. People with MS (pwMS) treated with cladribine were included. Two periods were defined: P1 = 2018 - 2020 and P2 = 2021 - 2023. A comparative analysis was carry out between P1 and P2 to assess the trend of use, clinical/demographic characteristics, and effectiveness. RESULTS: One hundred ninety- seven people with MS (pwMS) were included, mean EDSS: 2.2 ± 3.08, 72.6% female, mean age: 35.2 ± 9 years, mean disease duration: 6.6 ± 5.6 years, mean time lapse under cladribine: 26.1 ± 12.4 months. Regarding patient profile, we found significant differences between P1 and P2 in the MS evolution (p = 0.001) and EDSS ( p = 0.018) prior to initiation of cladribine. In the individualized analysis by year, we found a decrease in relapse number in the year prior to starting cladribine (p = 0.02). A higher proportion of No Evidence of Disease Activity (NEDA) was found in patients treated at P2 compared to those treated at P1 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An earlier use of cladribine achieved a significant increase in reaching NEDA. This learning curve in the use of cladribine allows a better identification of the candidate patient and influences the treatment effectiveness.

Practical Recommendations from the Gulf Region on the Therapeutic Use of Cladribine Tablets for the Management of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Impact of the Latest Real-World Evidence on Clinical Practice.

Cladribine tablets (CladT), like alemtuzumab, acts as an immune reconstitution therapy. However, CladT is administered orally (alemtuzumab is given by infusion) and without the potential for serious side effects that limit the therapeutic use of alemtuzumab in multiple sclerosis (MS). Treatment with CladT, given initially as short courses of treatment 1 year apart, provides years of freedom from MS disease activity in responders to treatment. The appearance of mild or moderate MS disease activity after the initial 2 years of treatment may prompt careful follow-up or a further course of CladT, depending on the nature of the activity and individual circumstances. The appearance of severe MS disease activity requires a switch to an alternative high-efficacy disease-modifying treatment (DMT). The accumulating data from CladT-treated people with MS in real-world studies, including those with follow-up durations extending for years beyond the initial treatment, have demonstrated long-term freedom from MS disease activity in a good proportion of patients. This clinical experience has also confirmed that treatment with CladT is generally safe and well tolerated. The best time to prescribe a high-efficacy DMT is the subject of debate, with evidence that earlier versus later use of such agents may provide more effective long-term protection from disability progression. High-efficacy DMTs have traditionally been reserved for use in people with MS and high disease activity on presentation or breakthrough disease on one or more DMTs, as per the current product labels. The latest evidence from real-world studies suggests that CladT is effective and safe in DMT-naïve patients, including those with shorter disease duration.

Evaluation of therapy satisfaction with cladribine tablets in patients with RMS: Final results of the non-interventional study CLEVER.

BACKGROUND: Cladribine tablets for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) are administered in two pulsed treatment courses in two consecutive years, totalling a maximum of 20 treatment days. Here we present data collected shortly after the launch of cladribine tablets, focusing on the patient's perspective. The objective was to investigate patients' perceived effectiveness, tolerability, and convenience, as well as global satisfaction of and with cladribine tablets. METHODS: CLEVER was a non-interventional multicentre study conducted in Germany from 12/2017 to 7/2020. Adult patients with RMS initiating therapy with cladribine tablets were included. Observation time per patient was 24 weeks, comprising 3 visits (baseline, week 4 and 24). The primary endpoint was overall treatment satisfaction at week 24, assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication 14 items (TSQM 1.4). Subgroup analyses included stratification by prior treatment. RESULTS: In total, 491 patients (69.2 % female; mean (±SD) age 40.3 (±11.5) years, 85.1 % pre-treated, median EDSS 2.5) initiated therapy with cladribine tablets and were included in the analysis. At week 24, the mean (±SD) global TSQM satisfaction score was 75.6 (±19.0). For patients switching from either injectables or oral medication, the change in therapy satisfaction from baseline to week 24 was positive in all TSQM domains with clinically meaningful effect sizes in the global satisfaction and side effects domains. Most patients (85.5 %) remained relapse-free over 24 weeks. Out of 491 patients, 187 (38.1 %) experienced at least one adverse event and 8 patients (1.6 %) one serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: Treatment satisfaction with cladribine tablets was high. The switch from prior injectables or oral medication translated into increased treatment satisfaction at week 24 with clinically meaningful effects in the global satisfaction and side effects domains. Effectiveness and safety were consistent with results from clinical studies.

Treatment continuation with cladribine at 5 years after initiation in people with multiple sclerosis: A case series and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Cladribine is an oral disease-modifying drug approved for the treatment of highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). The recommended number of treatment courses is two, with the courses given 1 year apart (i.e., in year 1 and year 2), followed by 2 years without treatment. Pivotal clinical trials showed that, compared with placebo, cladribine significantly reduced relapse rates, risk of disability progression and magnetic resonance imaging measures of disease activity for up to 4 years in treatment-naïve or -experienced adults with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). The management of patients and requirement for retreatment with cladribine beyond year 4 is unclear. METHODS: We describe the treatment history and outcomes of three people with MS retreated with cladribine, given as a third course 5 years after treatment initiation. We also include a review of evidence on retreatment with cladribine from year 3 onwards and a discussion of patient selection criteria for retreatment. RESULTS: The cases included a 53-year-old female patient with RRMS, a 43-year-old female patient with RRMS, and a 42-year-old male patient with RRMS. Six months after the third course of cladribine, all three patients were relapse-free and stable on magnetic resonance imaging, with no evidence of disease activity. At 11-12 months follow-up, all patients had clinical and radiological stability (i.e., no evidence of disease activity). CONCLUSION: Continuation of oral cladribine treatment may be considered for people with MS beyond year 5 following completion of the initial two courses. Our real-world experience is ongoing and additional data are required to obtain insight into patient phenotypes which predict response to cladribine treatment.

Early clinical effect of cladribine in patients with highly active multiple sclerosis in Mexico.

Background: Cladribine shows efficacy in multiple sclerosis (MS), but Latin American (LATAM) real-world data is limited, despite potential sociodemographic variations. Objective: Investigate baseline characteristics and clinical response in highly active MS patients in Mexico, identifying predictors of early treatment response. Method: A multicenter cohort study analyzed retrospective data from individuals with "highly active" MS in the Cladribine Patient Support Program across 11 Mexican clinics. Criteria included one-year prior treatment with another disease-modifying treatment and recent relapse with specific MRI findings. Primary outcomes focused on achieving NEDA-3 status after 12 months. Results: In the follow-up, 67.5% maintained NEDA-3 status. Baseline EDSS scores decreased significantly from 1.50 to 1.00 (p = 0.011), with no confirmed disability worsening. No significant differences were observed between NEDA-3 achievers and non-achievers in demographic and clinical variables. No severe adverse events were reported. Conclusion: Cladribine showed early and effective control of active MS in Mexican patients, demonstrating a secure profile with minimal adverse events. This study provides valuable real-world evidence in the LATAM context.

Cladribine effects on patient-reported outcomes and their clinical and biometric correlates in highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis at first switch: the observational, multicenter, prospective, phase IV CLADFIT-MS study.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are essential for understanding the effects of MS and its treatments on patients' lives; they play an important role in multiple sclerosis (MS) research and practice. We present the protocol for an observational study to prospectively assess the effect of cladribine tablets on PROs and their correlation to disability and physical activity in adults with highly active relapsing MS switching from a first disease modifying drug (DMD) to cladribine tablets in routine clinical practice at study sites in Italy. The primary objective will be to evaluate changes from baseline in the impact of highly active MS on self-assessed physical functioning 52 weeks after the switch to cladribine tablets using the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29). Secondary objectives will include self-assessed psychological impact of highly active MS in daily life and general health after the switch to cladribine tablets as well as changes in cognitive function, anxiety, and depression symptoms. Additional PRO measures will include the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Multiple Sclerosis (WPAI:MS), and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Wearable devices will acquire activity data (step counts, walking speed, time asleep, and energy expenditure). Additional clinical, radiological, and laboratory data will be collected when available during routine management. The findings will complement data from controlled trials by providing insight from daily clinical practice into the effect of cladribine tablets on the patient's experience and self-assessed impact of treatment on daily life.

Effectiveness of cladribine compared to fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Comparisons between cladribine and other potent immunotherapies for multiple sclerosis (MS) are lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of cladribine against fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab and alemtuzumab in relapsing-remitting MS. METHODS: Patients with relapsing-remitting MS treated with cladribine, fingolimod, natalizumab, ocrelizumab or alemtuzumab were identified in the global MSBase cohort and two additional UK centres. Patients were followed for ⩾6/12 and had ⩾3 in-person disability assessments. Patients were matched using propensity score. Four pairwise analyses compared annualised relapse rates (ARRs) and disability outcomes. RESULTS: The eligible cohorts consisted of 853 (fingolimod), 464 (natalizumab), 1131 (ocrelizumab), 123 (alemtuzumab) or 493 (cladribine) patients. Cladribine was associated with a lower ARR than fingolimod (0.07 vs. 0.12, p = 0.006) and a higher ARR than natalizumab (0.10 vs. 0.06, p = 0.03), ocrelizumab (0.09 vs. 0.05, p = 0.008) and alemtuzumab (0.17 vs. 0.04, p < 0.001). Compared to cladribine, the risk of disability worsening did not differ in patients treated with fingolimod (hazard ratio (HR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-2.47) or alemtuzumab (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.26-2.07), but was lower for patients treated with natalizumab (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.94) and ocrelizumab (HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.26-0.78). There was no evidence for a difference in disability improvement. CONCLUSION: Cladribine is an effective therapy that can be viewed as a step up in effectiveness from fingolimod, but is less effective than the most potent intravenous MS therapies.

Cladribine Use in Xanthoma Disseminatum: A Rare Case Presentation and Brief Updated Literature Review.

Xanthoma disseminatum (XD) is a rare, non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. While treatment is notoriously difficult, 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (cladribine) has recently emerged as a potential effective therapeutic option. Here, we describe the case of a 65-year-old male with XD who experienced significant cutaneous improvement after cladribine treatment. We also provide an updated literature review on cladribine use in patients with XD in light of reported adverse effects (AEs). While the efficacy of cladribine in XD is clear, no consensus exists for treatment duration and AE management. Hence, we strongly encourage interdisciplinary discourse involving dermatology and oncology in these cases.

Real-world effectiveness of cladribine as an escalation strategy for MS: Insights from the Czech nationwide ReMuS registry.

Background: Cladribine, a selective immune reconstitution therapy, is approved for the treatment of adult patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). Objectives: Provide experience with cladribine therapy in a real-world setting. Methods: This is a registry-based retrospective observational cohort study. First, using data from the Czech nationwide registry ReMuS, we analysed patients who initiated cladribine from September 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021. Second, we analysed a subgroup of patients who initiated cladribine between September 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020, thus possessing a follow-up period of at least 2 years. We evaluated demographic and MS characteristics including disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) before and after cladribine administration, relapses, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and adherence. Results: In total, 617 patients (335 with follow-up of at least 2 years) started cladribine therapy in the study period (mean age 37.0, mean disease duration 8.4 years, 74.1% females). In most cases, cladribine was administered as a second-line drug, a total of 80.7% had been escalated from a platform DMT. During 2 years before cladribine initiation, the average annualised relapse rate (ARR) was .67. Following cladribine initiation, the ARR decreased to .28 in the first year and .22 in the second year. Overall, across the entire two-year treatment period, 69.0% of patients were relapse-free and the average ARR was .25. As for EDSS development, the median baseline EDSS was 2.5 and remained stable even after 24 months. The adherence to treatment ranged of around 90%. Conclusion: This nationwide study confirms the efficacy of cladribine in real-world settings, especially in patients who are not treatment-naïve. In addition, the study shows an exceptionally high adherence rate, a finding that underscores the invaluable role of cladribine, but also the value of registry-based studies in capturing real-world clinical practice.

[Experience in the use of cladribine for the treatment of patients with highly active forms of multiple sclerosis in the Moscow region]. / Opyt ispol'zovaniya kladribina dlya lecheniya patsientov s vysokoaktivnym techeniem rasseyannogo skleroza v Moskovskoi oblasti.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of cladribine in patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS) in the Moscow region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was based on data from 62 patients treated with cladribine between March 2021 and January 2024. The diagnosis of VAMS was confirmed in 51 patients, PPMS in 4 patients, and SPMS with exacerbations was diagnosed in 7 cases. Of these, 3 patients completely completed therapy more than a year ago, 20 people received 2 courses of the drug less than a year ago, 39 patients underwent 1 course of therapy. The effect of cladribine on reducing disease activity and progression, as well as the safety of therapy, was evaluated. RESULTS: After 1 course, the number of patients with activity decreased by 66.4%, after 2 years of therapy - by 72.7%. The mean annual frequency of exacerbations decreased from 1.32 to 0.2 after 12 months, and to 0.086 exacerbations per year after 24 months. The level of disability assessed by the EDSS scale remained virtually unchanged throughout the follow-up. The most common adverse events were haematological abnormalities in the form of lymphopenia and leukopenia. Most patients had mild grade 1-2 lymphopenia on the toxicity scale and recovered to the recommended values (>0.8·109/l) by the beginning of the second course of therapy. No cases of serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained indicate the high efficacy and favorable safety profile of cladribine and are consistent with the data of clinical trials of the drug.

CLADIN- CLADribine and INnate immune response in multiple sclerosis - A phase IV prospective study.

Cladribine (Mavenclad®) is an oral treatment for relapsing remitting MS (RRMS), but its mechanism of action and its effects on innate immune responses in unknown. This study is a prospective Phase IV study of 41 patients with RRMS, and aims to investigate the mechanism of action of cladribine on peripheral monocytes, and its impact on the P2X7 receptor. There was a significant reduction in monocyte count in vivo at week 1 post cladribine administration, and the subset of cells being most impacted were the CD14lo CD16+ 'non-classical' monocytes. Of the 14 cytokines measured in serum, CCL2 levels increased at week 1. In vitro, cladrabine induced a reduction in P2X7R pore as well as channel activity. This study demonstrates a novel mechanism of action for cladribine. It calls for studying potential benefits of cladribine in progressive forms of MS and other neurodegenerative diseases where innate immune related inflammation is implicated in disease pathogenesis.

Real-world therapy management of patients with multiple sclerosis receiving cladribine tablets beyond year 4 - Results from a German cladribine cohort.

BACKGROUND: The current approval of oral cladribine covers four years, with two treatment courses in the first two years, followed by two treatment-free years. For decision-making in year 5, experts recommend three scenarios: Extending the treatment-free period, retreatment with cladribine, or therapy switch. OBJECTIVE: To assess the implementation of the three year-5-scenarios in clinical practice in a large multicentric real-world cohort in Germany. METHODS: Data from adult patients diagnosed with highly active RMS (first dose between 8/2017 and 8/2018) were included. The primary outcome was the percentages of patients who remained treatment-free in year 5, were retreated with cladribine, or switched to another therapy. RESULTS: In total, 187 patients (75 % female, mean age 38.6 years, median EDSS 2.5, 21 % DMT-naive) were evaluated. Overall, 27 (14 %) switched treatment within year 1-4, 36 (19 %) continued therapy with cladribine tablets in year 5, and 8 (4 %) switched therapy in year 5. All other patients (n = 118, 63 %) continued to be monitored without therapy in year 5. CONCLUSION: The recommended three treatment scenarios in year 5 appear to be feasible in clinical practice. Treatment-free structured monitoring is the most frequently applied strategy, highly likely due to the prospect of continuing low disease activity under cladribine treatment.

A multi-centre longitudinal study analysing multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy prescribing patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic raised concern amongst clinicians that disease-modifying therapies (DMT), particularly anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and fingolimod, could worsen COVID-19 in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). This study aimed to examine DMT prescribing trends pre- and post-pandemic onset. METHODS: A multi-centre longitudinal study with 8,771 participants from MSBase was conducted. Two time periods were defined: pre-pandemic (March 11 2018-March 10 2020) and post-pandemic onset (March 11 2020-11 March 2022). The association between time and prescribing trends was analysed using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression. DMT initiation refers to first initiation of any DMT, whilst DMT switches indicate changing regimen within 6 months of last use. RESULTS: Post-pandemic onset, there was a significant increase in DMT initiation/switching to natalizumab and cladribine [(Natalizumab-initiation: OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.39-2.13; switching: OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.40-1.98), (Cladribine-initiation: OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.09-1.87; switching: OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.41-1.98)]. Anti-CD20mAb initiation/switching decreased in the year of the pandemic, but recovered in the second year, such that overall odds increased slightly post-pandemic (initiation: OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.49; Switching: OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.29. Initiation/switching of fingolimod, interferon-beta, and alemtuzumab significantly decreased [(Fingolimod-initiation: OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.73; switching: OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.41-0.58), (Interferon-gamma-initiation: OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.41-0.57; switching: OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99), (Alemtuzumab-initiation: OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.48; switching: OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.44)]. CONCLUSIONS: Post-pandemic onset, clinicians preferentially prescribed natalizumab and cladribine over anti-CD20 mAbs and fingolimod, likely to preserve efficacy but reduce perceived immunosuppressive risks. This could have implications for disease progression in pwMS. Our findings highlight the significance of equitable DMT access globally, and the importance of evidence-based decision-making in global health challenges.

Clinical and biological predictors of Cladribine effectiveness in Multiple Sclerosis: A real-world, single Centre study considering a two-year interval from year-2 dosing.

OBJECTIVES: Cladribine tablets (CLAD) for adult patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) have been available in Italy since 2018. We aimed to assess predictors of no-evidence-of-disease-activity-3 (NEDA-3) status after 24 months of the last dose of CLAD. RESULTS: We included 88 patients (70.5% female, mean age at CLAD start 35.4 ± 11.4). Eighteen patients were treatment naïve, 48 switched to CLAD from a First line Disease Modifying Drug (DMD), and 22 from Second line DMDs. All patients were observed for a median follow-up time of 2.4 (1-4) years after the last dose of CLAD. Forty-nine patients (55.7%) showed NEDA at the last available follow-up. Naïve patients (p = 0.001), those with a lower number of previous DMDs (p < 0.001) and, even though not significantly, those switching from first line DMDs (p = 0.069) were more likely NEDA3 at the last available follow-up. In a subgroup of 30 patients (34%), Serum Light Neurofilaments (sNFL) levels showed a decrease from baseline to the 24 months of follow-up, statistically significant from baseline to the sixth month, and from the first to the second year detection. sNFL levels at 12th month showed a strong inverse correlation with the time to NEDA3 loss. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience provides information for the 2-years after the last dose of CLAD, confirming a higher effectiveness of CLAD when placed early in the treatment algorithm. Given the ongoing expansion of the therapeutic landscape in MS, sNfL could support individualized decision-making, used as blood-based biomarker for CLAD responses in clinical practice.

Detangling the Threads of Hairy Cell Leukemia, Beyond the Morphology and Into the Molecular.

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) makes up 2% of leukemias in the United States and encompasses great molecular heterogeneity. The standard treatment paradigm involves purine nucleoside analogues in the upfront setting with high complete response rate to initial therapy but frequent relapses. There is an increasing role for BRAF inhibitors, with or without rituximab, in refractory and even in untreated patients. The response to purine analogues in HCL variant cases, otherwise classified as splenic lymphoma with prominent nucleolus in the 5th WHO edition classification, is less robust. Several antibodies, small molecular inhibitors, and combination regimens have been explored in HCL but data is frequently limited by case reports or small case series. Here we review available treatment options including their efficacy and safety profiles. We also explore investigational agents and potential future targets. The goal is to present a comprehensive therapeutic review of this rare disease entity and outline the ever increasing and novel therapeutic management options which interrupt key pathways in the pathogenesis of this malignancy.

Making Information About Cladribine Tablets Accessible to People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Patient-Survey-Led Narrative Review for Healthcare Professionals.

Cladribine tablets have been granted marketing authorization in Europe and approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, people with MS (PwMS) may be more familiar, and therefore more confident, with treatments requiring long-term and frequent dosing. Differences in such treatment strategies can lead to questions relating to how short-course non-continuous treatments, such as cladribine tablets, can work and how well they are tolerated. In response to this, we aimed to create an evidence-based report on patient-focused aspects of treatment with cladribine. To inform development, MS experts, including healthcare professionals (HCPs) and PwMS, proposed topics that PwMS and their families and caregivers would most like to discuss with HCPs during consultations to help them better understand cladribine treatment. The statements regarding each topic were then ranked by PwMS and used to inform the topics covered in this report. We explain here the use of cladribine tablets, which includes explanations of how cladribine tablets work, how to take cladribine tablets, and considerations required prior to and while taking cladribine tablets. We also describe how cladribine tablets affect relapse rate and quality of life and detail side effects, when they are likely to happen, and for how long. We also discuss how cladribine tablets affect family planning, fertility, and the use of vaccines. Alongside each section is a brief, plain language description of what is covered and an accompanying visual to aid conversations between HCPs and PwMS. Improved understanding by PwMS of treatments, such as cladribine, can empower them to play a bigger role in shared decision-making regarding their treatment. Additionally, the open dialogue we aim to promote with this type of report could lead to treatment choices being better tailored for individuals with chronic diseases on the basis of personal experiences, preferences, and circumstances.

Impact of cladribine, cytarabine, and G-CSF (CLAG) as a bridging therapy prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.

The combination of cladribine, cytarabine, and G-CSF (CLAG) has exhibited robust synergistic anti-leukemia activity as an induction therapy (IT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, the impact of CLAG as a bridging therapy (BT) administered between IT and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML remains uncertain. In this retrospective study, we examined the efficacy of CLAG as a transitional strategy prior to allo-HSCT in R/R AML. We included 234 patients with R/R AML who received the modified busulfan plus cyclophosphamide conditioning regimen for allo-HSCT in our center during the past 6 years, performed a propensity-score matching analysis, partitioned them into four distinct cohorts, and further integrated them into the CLAG group and non-CLAG group based on response to IT and utilization of CLAG. Our cohorts encompassed 12 patients in Cohort A (modified composite complete remission (mCRc) after IT, CLAG), 31 in Cohort B (mCRc after IT, non-CLAG), 35 in Cohort C (non-complete remission (non-CR) after IT, CLAG), and 80 in Cohort D (non-CR after IT, non-CLAG). Intriguingly, among patients with non-CR status, the administration of CLAG correlated with a notably statistically diminished risk of relapse and improved survival at 2-year follow-up (Cohort C vs. Cohort D). Employing CLAG as a BT prior to allo-HSCT demonstrates substantial effectiveness, a relative degree of safety, and manageable toxicity in selected R/R AML cases.

Long-term results of the sequential combination of cladribine and rituximab in Hairy cell leukemia.

We report on the long-term efficacy and safety of a phase 2 trial of sequential cladribine and rituximab in hairy cell leukemia (HCL). One-hundred and thirty-nine patients were enrolled: 111 in the frontline setting, 18 in first relapse, and 10 with variant HCL (HCLv). A complete response (CR) was achieved in 133 of 137 evaluable participants (97%) with measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity in 102 (77%). MRD status was not associated with significant differences in event-free survival (EFS) or overall survival (OS). With a median follow-up of 7.8 years (range: 0.40-18.8), eight patients have experienced disease relapse (5.8%), 4/111 with newly diagnosed HCL (3·6%) and 4/10 with HCLv (40%) (p = 0.002). The 10-year EFS and OS rates were 86.7% and 91.1%, respectively. Grade 3 adverse events were observed in 28 participants (20·1%), mostly due to infections. Treatment of HCL with sequential cladribine followed by rituximab is associated with excellent efficacy and safety results both in the frontline and relapsed settings.