Lipoprotein apheresis: an established therapeutic modality for homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients refractory to PCSK9 inhibitors: a case report and literature review.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), is a rare genetic disorder characterized by dual mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene, leading to dysfunctional or absent LDLRs, often accompanied by severe premature Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) and exhibiting refractoriness to aggressive pharmacological interventions. Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), a form of lipoprotein apheresis (LA), has been effectively utilized as an adjunctive treatment modality to reduce serum LDL-C levels in refractory cases of HoFH. Here, we report a case of a 36-year-old female with HoFH who developed xanthomas on her limbs and waist at age 7. Despite maximum-tolerated doses of statins from age 32, combined with ezetimibe and evolocumab, her LDL-C levels remained critically elevated at 12-14 mmol/L. Her genetic testing confirmed a homozygous LDLR mutation. At 35 years old, she experienced exertional chest pain, and percutaneous coronary intervention revealed severe calcific left main stenosis, necessitating stent implantation. Subsequently, she initiated once every 1-2 months DFPP. Pre-DFPP, her LDL-C and total cholesterol (TC) levels were 13.82 ± 3.28 and 15.45 ± 0.78 mmol/L, respectively. Post-DFPP, her LDL-C and TC levels significantly decreased to 2.43 ± 0.33 mmol/L (81.76 ± 4.11% reduction) and 3.59 ± 0.41 mmol/L (76.76 ± 2.75% reduction), respectively. Lipoprotein (a) and triglycerides also decreased by 89.10 ± 1.39% and 42.29 ± 15.68%,respectively. Two years later, there was no progression of coronary artery disease, and her symptoms and xanthomas regressed significantly. Collectively, DFPP effectively reduces LDL-C levels in refractory cases of HoFH and contributes to delaying ASCVD progression, representing an efficacious adjunctive therapeutic modality.

Effectiveness of double-filtration plasmapheresis in reducing immunoglobulin and culprit antibody levels in neuroimmune disorders: A single-center retrospective analysis from China.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in reducing immunoglobulins and culprit antibodies in neuroimmune disorders. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 patients with neuroimmune diseases treated with DFPP, immunotherapy, and symptomatic treatment. Immunoglobulin and antibody levels were measured pre- and post-treatment, along with neurological function assessments using scales like the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Clinical Assessment Scale for Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE), and Myasthenia Gravis-specific scales. RESULTS: The cohort included patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), autoimmune encephalitis (AIE), myasthenia gravis (MG), anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein associated disease (MOGAD), and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS). DFPP significantly reduced immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgA, IgM) by ∼70 %. Most patients showed decreased antibody titers and significant neurological improvement. The median mRS score improved from 2 (IQR 2-3) to 1 (IQR 1-2) post-treatment, with further improvement at 90 days. Notable improvements were observed across various scales specific to NMOSD, MOGAD, AIE, and MG. Minor adverse events were reported, with no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: DFPP is effective in reducing immunoglobulin and antibody levels, leading to improved neurological function in neuroimmune disorders. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Pleiotropic effects of double filtration plasmapheresis.

Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) is a semi-selective blood purification modality derived from the plasma exchange modality. DFPP can be applied to a variety of refractory disorders including metabolic disorders, organ transplants, rheumatic disorders, neurological disorders, and dermatologic disorders. Familial hypercholesterolemia and lipoprotein (a) hyperlipoproteinemia are major chronic metabolic disorders. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is applied for those patients to remove low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)). DFPP is used as one of the modalities in LA. In addition to removing LDL-C and Lp(a), DFPP has pleiotropic effects such as removal of lipid metabolism-related substances, C-reactive protein lowering effect, removal of adhesion molecules, removal of inflammatory cytokines, and anti-oxidative effect. This article summarizes the pleiotropic effects of DFPP based on recent clinical articles.

Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients treated with chronic double filtration plasmapheresis.

BACKGROUND: The impact of chronic therapeutic plasmapheresis on humoral response following COVID-19 vaccination is poorly documented, especially among patients treated with double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP). OBJECTIVES: This retrospective single-center study evaluated the humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and studied anti-SPIKE seropositivity and antibody dynamics in patients with chronic DFPP at our institution. METHOD: All patients undergoing chronic DFPP at a tertiary center in France from December 2020 to November 2022 were included. We defined one patient subgroup as Group 1 to evaluate anti-SPIKE seropositivity after vaccination, with three groups based on their anti-SPIKE titers: (Group 1A) nonresponders (<0.8 UI/mL), (Group 1B) weak responders (0.8 to <250 binding antibody unit [BAU]/mL), and (Group 1C) strong responders (>250 BAU/mL). Group 2 served to evaluate antibody dynamics with anti-SPIKE levels measured 3 months after initial vaccination, Group 2A having a sustained level and Group 2B a declining pattern. RESULTS: The 21 patients included had a median age of 63 years, and 13 (56%) were male. The indications for chronic DFPP mainly included dysimmune pathologies (15; 71%) and familial dyslipidemia (6; 29%). For the humoral response to vaccination in Patient Group 1, the only nonresponder was a patient who had undergone kidney transplantation 30 months earlier and was on immunosuppressive medication. For Patient Group 2, the median follow-up of antibody titers was 13 months [12-13]. Two distinct patterns of anti-SPIKE dynamics were observed: a rapid decline in anti-SPIKE antibody titers within 6 months following the initial vaccination or booster dose (n = 10 [71.4%] Group 2A) and stable anti-SPIKE levels above 250 BAU/mL over >6 months (n = 4 [28.6%] Group 2B) with more patients with familial dyslipidemia in the former. CONCLUSIONS: Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination appears robust in patients undergoing chronic DFPP and may be linked to patients' immune status rather than DFPTP itself. Our results support current recommendations for administering three doses of vaccine with a booster every 6 months.

Is There a Place for Apheresis in the Management of Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy? A Report of Three Cases and Literature Review.

Membranous nephropathy constitutes approximately 20% of adult nephrotic syndrome cases. In approximately 80% of cases, membranous nephropathy is primary, mediated by IgG autoantibodies primarily targeting podocyte antigens (PLA2R, THSD7A, etc.). The treatment involves a combination of corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide or anti-CD20-based therapies, e.g., rituximab. In the event of significant proteinuria and in order to avoid the urinary elimination of rituximab, therapeutic apheresis, in particular semi-specific immunoadsorption, may be an option allowing for a reduction in proteinuria and autoantibodies before initiating treatment with rituximab. We present the preliminary experience of three patients treated with semi-specific immunoadsorption for primary membranous nephropathy between January 2021 and March 2023. Two patients were anti-PLA2R-autoantibody-positive and one was seronegative. The average age was 59 ± 17 years. Semi-specific immunoadsorption did not reduce albuminuria, but it, nevertheless, led to an increase in serum albumin, contributing to the regression of edema. It effectively eliminated anti-PLA2R autoantibodies in the two anti-PLA2R-positive patients. Consequently, apheresis may not induce a rapid reduction in proteinuria, but could contribute to a more accelerated remission when combined with the anti-CD20 treatment.

The effects of double-filtration plasmapheresis on coagulation profiles and the risk of bleeding.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) can be used to remove circulating pathogenic molecules. By reclaiming filtered albumin, DFPP reduces the need for albumin and plasma replacement. Large proteins, such as fibrinogen, are removed. Our institution adopts a DFPP treatment protocol consisting of active surveillance of coagulation profiles and prophylactic supplementation of blood products containing fibrinogen. This study aims to investigate the effects of consecutive DFPP treatments on serial coagulation profiles and the risk of bleeding under this protocol. METHODS: Serial laboratory data and bleeding events at a single tertiary medical center were prospectively collected. Prophylactic transfusion of cryoprecipitate or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) was instituted if significant coagulopathy or a clinically evident bleeding event was observed. RESULTS: After the first treatment session, plasma fibrinogen levels decreased from 332 ± 106 mg/dL to 96 ± 44 mg/dL in the 37 study patients. In the following sessions, plasma fibrinogen levels were maintained at around 100 mg/dL under prophylactic transfusion. No major bleeding events were recorded, but five (14%) patients experienced minor bleeding. CONCLUSION: DFPP treatment might be performed safely along with active monitoring of coagulation profiles and prophylactic transfusion of cryoprecipitate or FFP.

Application of Lipid Apheresis in Acute Lipogenic Pancreatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia-associated pancreatitis (HTG-AP) has been increasing. The pathogenesis of lipogenic pancreatitis is not fully understood. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the laboratory data, clinical manifestations, and prognosis of patients with lipid-derived pancreatitis who received lipid purification, to explore whether lipid purification is a better treatment for acute hyperlipidemic pancreatitis. METHODS: In this study, we enrolled five subjects diagnosed with HTG-AP at the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University between 2021 and 2022. We collected demographic data, medical histories, clinical manifestations, and laboratory data. All patients received routine therapy. Blood lipid purification was conducted using the double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) method. Plasma was separated from blood cells and purified to remove cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). SPSS was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: Following a single lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment, significant improvements in serum lipid levels were observed. Three patients achieved triglyceride levels below 5.65 mmol/L within 24 h, while the remaining 2 patients experienced reductions of 82% and 78%, respectively. The average triglyceride level decreased from 36.82 to 7.27 mmol/L, representing an 80% reduction from baseline. Total cholesterol decreased by 59% on average, and LDL levels decreased by 69%. Statistically significant differences were observed in triglyceride and cholesterol levels before and after treatment. Four patients exhibited increased HDL levels posttreatment, while 1 patient showed a decrease. The average HDL/TC level was 21% higher after treatment. CONCLUSION: LA in HTG-AP effectively improves clinical symptoms, rapidly lowers lipid levels, and achieves good therapeutic outcomes.

The effect of double filtration plasmapheresis and corticosteroids on patients with anti-dipeptidyl-peptidase-like protein 6 encephalitis.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-dipeptidyl-peptidase-like protein 6 (DPPX) encephalitis is a rare condition with varied symptoms including gastrointestinal issues, weight loss, cognitive and mental dysfunction, and hyperexcitability of the central nervous system. METHODS: We studied five patients with anti-DPPX encephalitis who received immunotherapy, specifically DFPP, at our hospital. We analyzed their clinical symptoms, lab results, electrophysiological and imaging findings, and outcomes with immunotherapy. RESULTS: Patients presented with cognitive dysfunction, tremor, seizures, psychiatric disturbances, and cerebellar and brainstem dysfunction. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed brain abnormalities in one patient and elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein levels in two patients. Antibodies against DPPX were detected in all patients and in CSF in two patients. One patient had antibodies against anti-CV2/contactin response mediator protein 5 (CRMP5). All patients responded well to DFPP and corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: DFPP may be an effective treatment for anti-DPPX encephalitis. Further research is needed to understand disease progression and evaluate immunotherapy efficacy.

The role of apheresis and insulin therapy in hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis-a concise review.

Severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is the third most common cause of acute pancreatitis (AP) and is involved in its pathogenesis. Chylomicrons increase blood viscosity and induce ischemia, while free fatty acids induce inflammation and distant organ damage. Conservative treatment options include fasting and insulin; limited evidence shows their comparable efficacy. Plasma exchange might provide more rapid lowering of triglycerides and amelioration of systemic effects of severe AP. Available data from controlled studies show only moderately faster lowering of triglycerides with apheresis (about 70% vs. 50% with conservative treatment within 24 h) and limited data from non-randomized studies show no improvement in clinical outcomes. New evidence is expected soon from ongoing large randomized trials. Until then, insulin may be used in mild HTG-AP and plasma exchange should be considered only in severe HTG-AP, especially if the decline of triglycerides with conservative treatment is slow, and in HTG-AP during pregnancy.

Non-meningeal, non-pulmonary cryptococcosis with limited posterior uveitis in a kidney organ transplant recipient with antibody-mediated rejection: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Cryptococcosis is one of the most frequent fungal eye infections in patients with immunosuppression. Currently, treatment approaches for non-meningeal, non-pulmonary cryptococcosis are based on those used for cryptococcal meningitis or pneumonia. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a rare case of non-meningeal, non-pulmonary cryptococcosis with clinical manifestations limited to one eye of a cadaveric kidney transplant recipient with chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection. Typical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatments, including antifungal therapies, adjunctive therapies, and immunosuppression reduction, are discussed. After timely diagnosis and treatment, her visual acuity recovered to baseline without recurrence or sequelae of cryptococcosis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of rare presentations of fungal infections, especially when a kidney transplant recipient with rejection has been treated with intensive immunosuppressants. Early diagnosis with individualized therapies may have a favorable prognosis.

Feasibility, Efficacy, and Safety of Peripheral Venous Access for Chronic Double-Filtration Plasmapheresis with Regional Citrate Anticoagulation.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral venous access (PVA) is recommended as a first-line vascular approach for therapeutic plasmapheresis with centrifugation methods but not filtration, which usually requires high blood flow. We evaluated the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) with PVA, using ultrasound guidance and regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA), i.e., PVA-RCA-DFPP in patients undergoing chronic DFPP. Secondly, we assessed the number of central venous catheters (CVCs) avoided. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study evaluated 22 adult patients on chronic DFPP to perform PVA-RCA-DFPP. They were classified into 3 groups: successful (i.e., completion of sessions with PVA), primary failure (i.e., no sessions completed), secondary failure (i.e., ≥1 session with PVA completed but secondary return with CVC or arteriovenous fistula). RESULTS: Among the 22 patients included (64% men), 7 patients (32%) were classified as primary failures (2 patient refusals, 5 inadequate PVAs), 1 patient (5%) as a secondary failure (due to uncomfortable venipunctures), and 14 patients (64%) as successful. In the successful group including 12 patients treated for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and 2 patients for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (2 patients), 116 sessions were performed, with a median treated plasma volume of 4.3 L [IQR 3.6-4.6] (45 mL/kg) for a median duration of 134 min [IQR 122-144], and a median blood flow of 94 mL/min [IQR 87-103]. For the CIDP group, 90% of sessions achieved a plasma volume >1 TPV, and for the FH group 91% of sessions achieved an LDLc reduction >60%. Eleven sessions out of 116 (9%) were interrupted, mostly due to PVA dysfunction (5/11) and circuit clotting (4/11). Session interruptions decreased significantly between each patient's first and following sessions (29% to 7%, p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Chronic PVA-RCA-DFPP can be performed safely and efficiently, avoiding the use of CVCs.

Double filtration plasmapheresis combined with rituximab for donor-specific antibody desensitization in haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major cause of engraftment failure in patients receiving haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Haplo-HSCT). Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) avoids the unnecessary loss of plasma proteins and increases the efficiency of purification. To investigate the effectiveness of the desensitization protocol including DFPP and rituximab, we conducted a nested case-control study. Thirty-three patients who had positive DSA were desensitized by the protocol and 99 patients with negative DSA were randomly matched as control. The median DSA mean fluorescence intensity values before and after DFPP treatment were 7505.88 ± 4424.38 versus 2013.29 ± 4067.22 (p < 0.001). All patients in DSA group achieved haematopoietic reconstitution and the median neutrophils and platelets engraftment times were 13 (10-21) and 13 (10-29) days respectively. Although the cumulative incidence of II-IV aGVHD (41.4% vs. 28.1%) and 3-year moderate to severe cGVHD (16.8% vs. 7.2%) were higher in DSA cohort than in the control, no statistical significance was observed. The 3-year non-relapse mortality and the overall survival were 6.39% and 72.0%, respectively, in the DSA cohort, which were comparable to the negative control. In conclusion, DFPP and rituximab could be effectively used for desensitization and overcome the negative effects of DSA in Haplo-HSCT.

Clinical efficacy of centrifugal-membranous hybrid double filtration plasmapheresis and membranous double filtration plasmapheresis on severe lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVE: The study delves into the clinical efficacy and safety of centrifugal-membranous hybrid double filtration plasmapheresis (C/M hybrid DFPP) on severe lupus nephritis (LN) by comparing it with membranous DFPP (M DFPP). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 70 patients who were diagnosed with severe LN and had received DFPP treatment. RESULTS: A total of 181 DFPPs were performed, including 133 C/M hybrid DFPPs (51 patients) and 48 M DFPPs (19 patients).The ANA, A-dsDNA titer, quantitative urinary protein, and serum creatinine decreased significantly and hemoglobin increased significantly after the DFPP treatment and at third month after treatment. Two patients in the M DFPP group developed bleeding complications, and four patients in the C/M hybrid DFPP group developed perioral numbness. CONCLUSION: Although there was no significant difference in clinical efficacy between C/M hybrid DFPP and M DFPP on severe LN, the risk of bleeding complications was significantly lower in the C/M hybrid DFPP group.

Case report: Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) for severe rhesus-D alloimmunization in two pregnant patients.

Maternal erythrocyte alloimmunization is one of the most important causes of fetal anemia. The standard treatment for anemic fetuses is intrauterine blood transfusion (IUT). However, IUT may have adverse effects, particularly before 20 weeks of gestation. In this report, two women who had previously had severely affected alloimmunized pregnancy developed high titers of anti-D antibodies before 20 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Doppler showed severe fetal anemia, and intrauterine transfusion was expected to be unavoidable. To prolong pregnancy to a gestation in which intravascular IUT was possible, we used repeated double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) as a rescue therapy. The titers of IgG-D, IgG-A, and IgG-B decreased after DFPP treatment. One woman successfully prolonged pregnancy until 20 weeks of gestation. Subsequently, she underwent four cycles of IUTs and delivered at 30 weeks of gestation by emergency cesarean section due to fetal bradycardia during the fifth intrauterine transfusion. The other woman successfully delayed intrauterine transfusion until 26 weeks of gestation. The favorable results of the two patients indicate that DFPP may be an effective and safe treatment modality for RhD immunity in pregnant women. Moreover, DFPP is potentially helpful for reducing the occurrence of ABO hemolytic disease in neonates due to the clearance of IgG-A and IgG-B antibodies (e.g., O pregnant women harbored A/B/AB neonates). However, more clinical trials are needed to verify the results.

Double filtration plasmapheresis for children with different types of critical kidney diseases: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Background: Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) was initially used to facilitate the conduction of ABO-incompatible renal transplantation. The applicability of DFPP has recently expanded to cover the removal of various antibodies in adults with immune-mediated diseases. However, DFPP is seldom used in children, with few reports addressing its efficacy and safety in this population. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and adverse effects of DFPP for pediatric patients with renal indications. Methods: Children who received DFPP between December 2017 and December 2020 at Tongji Hospital were retrospectively studied, and sub-grouped for analysis according to the types of disease. All children received 3 to 6 DFPP sessions within 2 to 3 weeks, and were assessed for clinical outcomes according to glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria and extra-renal symptoms. Pre- and post-DFPP plasma were collected to measure the levels of pathogenic autoantibodies, immunoglobulins, fibrinogen, albumin, calcium, etc. In-hospital complications were also recorded. Results: Totally there were 10 children receiving 44 sessions of DFPP, including 2 males and 8 females, with a median age of 11.2 years old (5-13 years) and a median weight of 42.1 kg (20-59 kg). Five patients were treated for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), three patients for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), one for C3 glomerulopathy and one for ABO-incompatible renal transplantation. Plasma autoantibodies decreased substantially by 93% and 89% in those with SLE and AAV after the last session, respectively. Complete or partial responses were achieved in 80%, 33.3%, 100% and 100% of patients with SLE, AAV, C3 glomerulopathy, and ABO-incompatible renal transplantation, respectively. The proportion of cumulative IgG, fibrinogen, and albumin removal at the end of the last sessions were 58.8%, 67.69%, and 14.05% respectively. The removal of calcium, potassium and creatinine were not statistically significant. A few episodes (4.55%) of hypotension were observed when fresh frozen plasma was used as the replacement fluid, and no bleeding nor severe anaphylaxis was noted. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of DFPP treatment in children with SLE, AAV, C3 glomerulopathy and ABO-incompatible renal transplantation were described in the present study. DFPP is proven to be a safe apheresis method for children weighing more than 20 kg.

Failure of double filtration plasmapheresis to treat severe pemphigus vulgaris: A case report.

Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a chronic, mucocutaneous, autoimmune bullous disease. Double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) may be effective when PV fails to be controlled by conventional corticosteroid treatment. The patient was a 64-year-old man with erythema, blisters, and erosions on his head, face, mouth, trunk, limbs, and scrotum for over a month. He was diagnosed with severe PV, and the original rash area continued to expand after treatment with systemic corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and intravenous immunoglobulin, with massive exudate and ≥5 new blisters and macules still occurring daily. Subsequently, the patient completed three sessions of DFPP. After the first DFPP, the original erosion surface exudate was significantly reduced and gradually healed. After the second DFPP, the erosion area and exudate increased compared with the previous one. After the third DFPP, the rash did not improve further and had a tendency to continue to progress. During the entire three sessions of DFPP, the patient had new blisters and bullae on his limbs every day. The Nikolsky's sign of the limbs turned negative at the initial stage, and then the trunk and limbs Nikolsky's sign became positive again. The titer of autoantibodies did not decrease significantly after the plasmapheresis. The patient eventually died of secondary lung infection and septic shock. The efficacy of DFPP in this patient with refractory severe PV was poor.

Efficacy and cost of double filtration plasmapheresis in severe hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis: A retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The value of double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) in severe hypertriglyceridemia-induced pancreatitis (sHTGP) is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of DFPP on clinical outcomes in patients with sHTGP and the costs associated with the procedure. METHODS: Patients who underwent DFPP after admission between January 2016 and December 2021 were recruited. Data on lipid profile, clinical parameters, and costs were retrospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty sHTGP patients who received DFPP were enrolled. All of the lipid profile were significantly reduced and maintained a downward trend. The APACHE II score on admission was higher and the reduction after DFPP was more obvious (P < 0.05) in patients with higher triglyceride (TG) levels (≥33.9 mmol/L) than in patients with lower TG levels. More material fees were expended in the higher TG group due to more DFPP sessions (P < 0.05), but no significant differences existed in total hospital costs between the two groups. CONCLUSION: DFPP could rapidly and effectively reduce TGs to a safe level. APACHE II score reduction was obvious in patients with TGs ≥33.9 mmol/L and was associated with lipid profile changes. DFPP may benefit sHTGP patients with a TG level higher than the current initiation threshold.

Plasmapheresis compared with conventional treatment for hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP) induced by hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) remains controversial with regard to plasmapheresis vs conventional treatment. We reviewed relevant articles to explore the efficacy of plasmapheresis in the management of HTG-induced AP. METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies that compared plasmapheresis with conventional treatment for HTG-induced AP using three databases: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, as well as relevant references. The primary outcomes were 24 h triglyceride reduction rate and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 791 articles were retrieved. Finally, 15 observational studies (1080 participants) were included, most of which were historical cohort studies. Compared with conventional treatment, plasmapheresis assisted in the reduction of serum triglyceride (TG) levels in the first 24 h after hospital admission (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17 to 0.99; P = 0.005). However, it resulted in increased hospitalization costs (thousand yuan) (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 24.32; 95% CI: 12.96 to 35.68; P < 0.001). With regard to in-hospital mortality, although the mortality rate in the plasmapheresis group was higher than that in the conventional treatment group (relative risk [RR]: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.03 to 2.94; P = 0.038), the result was disturbed by confounding factors as per the subgroup and sensitivity analysis, as well as trial sequential analysis (TSA). No significant differences were found in other outcomes, including systematic complications, local complications, the requirement for surgery, and hospitalization duration. CONCLUSION: The effect of plasmapheresis in HTG-induced AP is not superior to that of conventional treatment, even resulting in a greater economic burden to patients and health care system. High quality randomized control trials are required to obtain a more a definitive understanding of this issue.

The fluctuation of skin perfusion pressure in hemodialysis patients treated with LDL apheresis therapy: A comparison of LDL adsorption and double filtration plasmapheresis.

BACKGROUND: There have been a number of reports suggesting that LDL apheresis, including LDL adsorption and double filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP), can be applied for the treatment of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in hemodialysis patients, whereas there is no definitive recommendation for the use of LDL apheresis. STUDY DESIGN: The change of skin perfusion pressure (SPP) during LDL apheresis was measured in every single treatment to determine the effect of LDL adsorption and DFPP on improving blood flow in lower extremity PAD hemodialysis patients. Eleven hemodialysis patients treated with more than two series of LDL apheresis were involved in the study. "One series" included 10 treatments of LDL apheresis according to the Japanese health care insurance system. RESULTS: In total, 320 treatments (32 series) of LDL apheresis were performed utilizing either LDL adsorption or DFPP treatment in 11 patients. The SPP values pre- and post-apheresis were recorded in 315 treatments (228 LDL adsorption and 87 DFPP). The SPP was significantly improved after both LDL adsorption (P < .001) and DFPP (P = .002) treatment. The median change of SPP was significantly larger in the LDL adsorption group (12.6 mm Hg, range: -48.5, 77.0 mm Hg) than in the DFPP group (6.7 mm Hg, range: -42.0, 72.5 mm Hg) (P = .003). The LDL adsorption consistently offered a significant increase in the SPP, whereas DFPP treatment seemed to have modest effects on the improvement of SPP compared to the LDL adsorption. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that LDL adsorption should be considered the primary LDL apheresis therapy for lower extremity PAD in hemodialysis patients to achieve improvement of blood flow.