Cognitive safety of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for tremor: 1-year follow-up results of the COGNIFUS part 2 study.

Introduction: In the COGNitive in Focused UltraSound (COGNIFUS) study, we examined the 6-month cognitive outcomes of patients undergoing MRgFUS thalamotomy. This study endorsed the safety profile of the procedure in terms of cognitive functions that cannot be evaluated in real-time during the procedure unlike other aspects. The aim of the COGNIFUS Part 2 study was to investigate the cognitive trajectory of MRgFUS patients over a 1-year period, in order to confirm long-term safety and satisfaction. Methods: We prospectively evaluated the cognitive and neurobehavioral profile of patients with essential tremor (ET) or Parkinson's Disease (PD) related tremor undergoing MRgFUS thalamotomy at 1 year-follow-up following the treatment. Results: The sample consists of 50 patients (male 76%; mean age ± SD 69.0 ± 8.56; mean disease duration ± SD 12.13 ± 12.59; ET 28, PD 22 patients). A significant improvement was detected at the 1 year-follow-up assessment in anxiety and mood feelings (Hamilton Anxiety rating scale 5.66 ± 5.02 vs. 2.69 ± 3.76, p ≤ <0.001; Beck depression Inventory II score 3.74 ± 3.80 vs. 1.80 ± 2.78, p = 0.001), memory domains (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, immediate recall 31.76 ± 7.60 vs. 35.38 ± 7.72, p = 0.001 and delayed recall scores 5.57 ± 2 0.75 vs. 6.41 ± 2.48), frontal functions (Frontal Assessment Battery score 14.24 ± 3.04 vs. 15.16 ± 2.74) and in quality of life (Quality of life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire 35.00 ± 12.08 vs. 9.03 ± 10.64, p ≤ 0.001 and PD Questionnaire -8 7.86 ± 3.10 vs. 3.09 ± 2.29, p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: Our study supports the long-term efficacy and cognitive safety of MRgFUS treatment for ET and PD.

Systematic review-based guideline "Parkinson's disease" of the German Society of Neurology: diagnostic use of transcranial sonography.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Transcranial brain parenchyma sonography (TCS) has been recommended as a tool for the early and differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) in German and European clinical guidelines. Still, the brain structures to be examined for the diagnostic questions and the requirements for being a qualified investigator were not specified in detail. These issues have now been addressed in the 2023 update of the clinical guideline on PD by the German Society of Neurology (DGN). METHODS: The recommendations were based on a systematic literature review following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. RESULTS: Three diagnostic questions were defined: (1) What is the accuracy of TCS in the differential diagnosis of PD versus atypical and secondary Parkinsonian syndromes? (2) What is the accuracy of TCS in the differential diagnosis of PD versus essential tremor? (3) What is the accuracy of TCS in the diagnosis of PD in persons with typical early symptoms, compared with the diagnosis established by clinical follow-up? The brain structures to be assessed and the level of recommendation were formulated for these questions. The training requirements for being regarded as qualified TCS investigator were stipulated by the responsible medical societies (German Society of Ultrasound in Medicine, DEGUM; German Society for Clinical Neurophysiology and Functional Imaging, DGKN). Finally, the recommendations for these diagnostic questions reached strong consensus (each ≥ 97%) of the guideline committee. Here, the details of review and recommendations are presented. CONCLUSION: The updated guideline clarifies the diagnostic uses and limitations of TCS in PD.

Tremor-associated short tandem repeat intermediate and pathogenic expansions in familial essential tremor.

There is an obvious clinical-pathological overlap between essential tremor and some known tremor-associated short tandem repeat expansion disorders. The aim is to analyse whether these short tandem repeat genes, including ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN3, CACNA1A, ATXN7, ATXN8OS, ATXN10, PPP2R2B, TBP, BEAN1, NOP56, DAB1, ATN1, SADM12 and FMR1, are associated with familial essential tremor patients. Genetic analysis of repeat sizes in tremor-associated short tandem repeat expansions was performed in a large cohort of 515 familial essential tremor probands and 300 controls. The demographic and clinical features among carriers of pathogenic expansions, intermediate repeats and non-carriers were compared. A total of 18 out of 515 (18/515, 3.7%) patients were found to have repeats expansions, including 12 cases (12/515, 2.5%) with intermediate repeat expansions (one ATXN1, eight TBP, two FMR1, one ATN1), and six cases (6/515, 1.2%) with pathogenic expansions (one ATXN1, one ATXN2, one ATXN8OS, one PPP2R2B, one FMR1, one SAMD12). There were no statistically significant differences in intermediate repeats compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in demographics and clinical features among individuals with pathogenic expansions, intermediate repeat expansions carriers and non-carriers. Our study indicates that the intermediate repeat expansion in tremor-associated short tandem repeat expansions does not pose an increased risk for essential tremor, and rare pathogenic expansion carriers have been found in the familial essential tremor cohort. The diagnosis of essential tremor based solely on clinical symptoms remains a challenge in distinguishing it from known short tandem repeat expansions diseases with overlapping clinical-pathological features.

Staged magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for the treatment of bilateral essential tremor and Parkinson's disease related tremor: a systematic review and critical appraisal of current knowledge.

Introduction: Essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson's Disease (PD) are debilitating neurodegenerative disorders characterized by tremor as a predominant symptom, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) Thalamotomy is an innovative therapeutic option for the treatment of unilateral medically refractory tremor with fewer adverse effects compared to traditional surgical interventions. A recent CE approval allows appropriate patients to have their second side treated. Objective: The objective of this systematic review was to analyze available current knowledge about the use of MRgFUS for the treatment of bilateral ET and PD related tremor, to identify the effectiveness and the risks associated with bilateral treatment. Methods: Eligible studies were identified by searching published studies in PubMed and Scopus databases from May 2014 to January 2024 and by identifying ongoing studies registered on the clinicaltrials.gov website. Data were summarized by considering the following information topics: the number of patients involved, the selected lesion target, the assessment tool used to evaluate clinical changes, the observed improvement, the reported side effects, and the time interval between the two treatments. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024513178). Results: Nine studies were eligible for this review, 7 for ET and 2 for PD. The involved population included a variable number of patients, ranging from 1 to 11 subjects for ET and from 10 to 15 subjects for PD. The main lesional targets were the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus, the pallidothalamic tract and the cerebellothalamic tract bilaterally. All studies investigated the tremor relief through the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) in patients with ET, and through the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in patients with PD. A variable degree of improvement was observed, with all patients expressing overall satisfaction with the bilateral treatment. Adverse events were mild and transient, primarily involving gait disturbances, dysarthria, and ataxia. A standardized protocol for administering the two consecutive treatments was not identifiable; typically, the timing of the second treatment was delayed by at least 6 months. Conclusion: Available evidence supports the effectiveness and safety of staged bilateral MRgFUS treatments for ET and PD-related tremor.

Validation of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision-Clinical Modification Diagnostic Code for Essential Tremor.

Background: The positive predictive value (PPV) of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code for "essential and other specified forms of tremor" in identifying essential tremor (ET) cases was found to be less than 50%. The ability of the ICD-10-CM G25.0 code for "essential tremor" to identify ET has not been determined. The study objective was to determine the PPV of the G25.0 code. Methods: Patients in a tertiary health system with a primary care encounter associated with ICD-10-CM code G25.0 in 2022 underwent medical record review to determine if the consensus criteria from the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society for an ET diagnosis were met. Results: 442 patients were included. The PPV of G25.0 in identifying probable ET cases was 74.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 70.4-78.5%). Among patients prescribed propranolol, the PPV improved to 87.8% (95% CI 78.0-93.6%). Discussion: Compared to the ICD-9-CM code 333.1, G25.0 is superior for identifying ET cases. A potential limitation of this study is that the consensus criteria applied relies on nonspecific physical exam findings which may lead to an overestimation of the PPV of G25.0. Highlights: The ICD-10-CM diagnosis code for essential tremor has not been previously validated. The objective of this study was to determine the PPV of the G25.0 code. The PPV in identifying essential tremor cases was 74.7%. The PPV improved among patients prescribed propranolol.

An Eye on the First Surgical Side: Appreciating the Potential Impacts of a Second DBS Lead on Ipsilateral Symptoms.

Clinical Vignette: A 63-year-old man with severe essential tremor underwent staged bilateral ventralis intermedius (Vim) deep brain stimulation (DBS). Left Vim DBS resulted in improved right upper extremity tremor control. Months later, the addition of right Vim DBS to the other brain hemisphere was associated with acute worsening of the right upper extremity tremor. Clinical Dilemma: In staged bilateral Vim DBS, second lead implantation may possibly alter ipsilateral tremor control. While ipsilateral improvement is common, rarely, it can disrupt previously achieved benefit. Clinical Solution: DBS programming, including an increase in left Vim DBS amplitude, re-established and enhanced bilateral tremor control. Gap in Knowledge: The mechanisms underlying changes in ipsilateral tremor control following a second lead implantation are unknown. In this case, worsening and subsequent improvement after optimization highlight the potential impact of DBS implantation on the ipsilateral side. Expert Commentary: After staged bilateral Vim DBS, clinicians should keep an eye on the first or original DBS side and carefully monitor for emergent side effects or worsening in tremor. Ipsilateral effects resulting from DBS implantation present a reprogramming opportunity with a potential to further optimize clinical outcomes. Highlights: This case report highlights the potential for ipsilateral tremor worsening following staged bilateral DBS and provides valuable insights into troubleshooting and reprogramming strategies. The report emphasizes the importance of vigilant monitoring and individualized management in optimizing clinical outcomes for patients undergoing staged bilateral DBS for essential tremor.

Assessing ChatGPT Ability to Answer Frequently Asked Questions About Essential Tremor.

Background: Large-language models (LLMs) driven by artificial intelligence allow people to engage in direct conversations about their health. The accuracy and readability of the answers provided by ChatGPT, the most famous LLM, about Essential Tremor (ET), one of the commonest movement disorders, have not yet been evaluated. Methods: Answers given by ChatGPT to 10 questions about ET were evaluated by 5 professionals and 15 laypeople with a score ranging from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) in terms of clarity, relevance, accuracy (only for professionals), comprehensiveness, and overall value of the response. We further calculated the readability of the answers. Results: ChatGPT answers received relatively positive evaluations, with median scores ranging between 4 and 5, by both groups and independently from the type of question. However, there was only moderate agreement between raters, especially in the group of professionals. Moreover, readability levels were poor for all examined answers. Discussion: ChatGPT provided relatively accurate and relevant answers, with some variability as judged by the group of professionals suggesting that the degree of literacy about ET has influenced the ratings and, indirectly, that the quality of information provided in clinical practice is also variable. Moreover, the readability of the answer provided by ChatGPT was found to be poor. LLMs will likely play a significant role in the future; therefore, health-related content generated by these tools should be monitored.

How Long Does Deep Brain Stimulation Give Patients Benefit?

INTRODUCTION: One of the most common questions patients ask when they are contemplating deep brain stimulation (DBS) is how long it will last. To guide physicians in answering this query, we performed a scoping review to assess the current state of the literature and to identify the gaps that need to be addressed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors performed a MEDLINE search inclusive of articles from January 1987 (advent of DBS literature) to June 2023 including human and modeling studies written in English. For longevity of therapy data, only studies with a mean follow-up of ≥three years were included. Using the Rayyan platform, two reviewers (JP and RM) performed a title screen. Of the 734 articles, 205 were selected by title screen and 109 from abstract review. Ultimately, a total of 122 articles were reviewed. The research questions we explored were 1) how long can the different components of the DBS system maintain functionality? and 2) how long can DBS remain efficacious in treating Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor (ET), dystonia, and other disorders? RESULTS: We showed that patients with PD, ET, and dystonia maintain a considerable long-term benefit in motor scores seven to ten years after implant, although the percentage improvement decreases over time. Stimulation off scores in PD and ET show worsening, consistent with disease progression. Battery life varies by the disease treated and the programming settings used. There remains a paucity of literature after ten years, and the impact of new device technology has not been classified to date. CONCLUSION: We reviewed existing data on DBS longevity. Overall, outcomes data after ten years of therapy are substantially limited in the current literature. We recommend that physicians who have data for patients with DBS exceeding this duration publish their results.

Estimating Disability in Patients with Essential Tremor: Comparison of Tremor Rating Scale, Spiral Drawing, and Accelerometric Tremor Power.

BACKGROUND: Although performance rating scales, spiral drawing, water pouring, and accelerometry are commonly used to assess tremor severity, the extent to which their results correlate with impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to identify the most effective predictors of ADL in essential tremor (ET). METHODS: Forty ET patients were examined using The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), spiral drawing, volume of water spilled, and accelerometric tremor power. Root-mean-square error, R2, and F-test were calculated for models predicting TETRAS ADL subscore. RESULTS: TETRAS Performance Subscale explained the variability in TETRAS ADL with an R2 value of 0.686. Models incorporating spiral rating and accelerometric tremor power (R2 = 0.731) and water spillage volume (R2 = 0.756) were not statistically superior. CONCLUSIONS: TETRAS performance subscore predicted nearly 70% ADL impairment in ET patients. Incorporating the spiral rating, accelerometric tremor power, and water pouring test did not enhance ADL estimation.

Prescription Drug Utilization among Patients with Essential Tremor: A Cross-Sectional Study of More Than 36,000 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Essential tremor (ET) is a chronic, progressive neurological disease that affects an estimated 7 million individuals in the United States (ie, 2.2% of the entire U.S. population). Despite its high prevalence, there are a few published studies on patterns of prescription medication use among patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to examine prescription drug medication use among ET patients. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of ET patients, age ≥40, with at least 1 prescription medication fill using the Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database from 2018 through 2019. We examined patterns of fills of key agents used to treat ET. RESULTS: The final sample comprised 36,839 ET patients in the United States; 89% had at least 1 prescription drug claim over a 2-year period, indicating that 9 of 10 ET patients take a medication to treat their disease. For each of the 3 most frequently prescribed medications, only a modest fraction (1/5 to 1/4) of patients were taking that medication. Adherence to these agents was 52% to 61%. A high percentage of patients had fills for more than 1 of the main agents we studied. CONCLUSION: These data illustrate a need for medication in the ET population. There is only 1 FDA-approved medication to treat ET, propranolol, and less than 25% of ET patients used this drug during our study period. At the same time, no single agent was utilized by more than one quarter of ET patients, adherence was low, and use of multiple agents was common. For such a common disease, the pharmacotherapeutic landscape is impoverished.

Double lesion MRgFUS thalamotomy for essential tremor: 4.5-year outcomes and framework for assessing loss of efficacy and tremor progression.

BACKGROUND: The essential tremor (ET) course to 54 months post-unilateral VIM/PSA magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) in the treated arm (TA) and non-treated arm (NTA) of 12 patients is reported. METHODS: Tremor severity was rated using Bain Findley spirography (BFS) scores in the TA and NTA. We divided follow-up into 'Early' (0-6 months) and 'Late' (6-54 months) phases, to minimise the effect of peri-lesion oedema resolution on the latter. RESULTS: The mean baseline BFS score was 6.2 in TA and 5.7 in the NTA. After unilateral VIM/PSA MRgFUS, mean BFS improved in TA at all subsequent time points (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between BFS scores at consecutive assessments or between 1 and 54 months, while the NTA BFS scores worsened between 12 and 24 months (p < 0.003). Three patients showed worsening of their TA BFS scores and an increasing NTA-TA BFS difference, indicating slower tremor worsening in TA compared to NTA, whilst one patient showed a greater rate of worsening in the TA compared to NTA BFS. CONCLUSION: After 54 months, the beneficial effect of MRgFUS is usually maintained with any worsening of BFS scores in TA slower than in NTA. Loss of treatment benefit is rare.

Distinguishing essential tremor from Parkinson's disease: clinical and experimental tools.

INTRODUCTION: Essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are the most common causes of tremor and the most prevalent movement disorders, with overlapping clinical features that can lead to diagnostic challenges, especially in the early stages. AREAS COVERED: In the present paper, the authors review the clinical and experimental studies and emphasized the major aspects to differentiate between ET and PD, with particular attention to cardinal phenomenological features of these two conditions. Ancillary and experimental techniques, including neurophysiology, neuroimaging, fluid biomarker evaluation, and innovative methods, are also discussed for their role in differential diagnosis between ET and PD. Special attention is given to investigations and tools applicable in the early stages of the diseases, when the differential diagnosis between the two conditions is more challenging. Furthermore, the authors discuss knowledge gaps and unsolved issues in the field. EXPERT OPINION: Distinguishing ET and PD is crucial for prognostic purposes and appropriate treatment. Additionally, accurate diagnosis is critical for optimizing clinical and experimental research on pathophysiology and innovative therapies. In a few years, integrated technologies could enable accurate, reliable diagnosis from early disease stages or prodromal stages in at-risk populations, but further research combining different techniques is needed.

Exploring serum α­synuclein and its autoantibodies in essential tremor: implications for diagnosis and symptom correlations.

There is no definite biomarker for confirming the diagnosis of essential tremor (ET) or differentiating it from other diseases, particularly Parkinson's disease. The present study aimed to investigate the serum levels of the α-synuclein protein (α-syn) and its autoantibodies in patients with ET compared with healthy controls and its relation to motor and non-motor symptoms in patients with ET. Serum α-syn and its autoantibodies were measured in 32 patients with ET and 32 age- and sex-matched controls. Both groups were assessed using the non-motor symptoms scale, MoCA, Beck Depression Inventory, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, and the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire. Tremor was assessed using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale. The serum α-syn concentration in patients with ET was significantly lower than that in healthy controls (P<0.001), with a positive predictive value of 0.81 and a negative predictive value of 0.75, while the serum anti-a-syn autoantibody concentration was not significantly different between the two groups. There were no correlations between serum α-syn or its autoantibodies and patients' clinical characteristics. Furthermore, patients with ET had worse cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, non-motor symptoms and quality of life. The serum α-syn concentration was lower in patients with ET than in controls, with favorable predictive values, suggesting that it could serve as a biomarker for ET diagnosis.

Testing for Alcohol Responsiveness in Familial Essential Tremor.

Background: Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder in adults and is considered to be highly heritable. A reduction of the tremor amplitude after alcohol consumption is reported in approximately half of the patients. In this study, we describe the alcohol response in our familial ET cohort by employing an alcohol responsivity test designed by Knudsen et al. outside its original research group for the first time. Methods: We recruited families with at least three trembling family members and confirmed ET diagnoses. During the in-hospital alcohol responsivity test, tremor was measured using Archimedes spirals before alcohol consumption (T0), one hour after alcohol intake (T1), and the next morning (T2). The spirals were rated by two independent raters using the Bain Findley scale. The average of these two scores was calculated as the Archimedes Spiral Rating (ASR) for each time point. Results: Twenty-four confirmed ET patients were included for analysis. The median ASR at T0 (5.0) and T2 (4.75) were significantly higher than the median ASR at T1 (3.25) (both p < 0.001). In 67% of patients, a difference in ASR between T0 and T1 (dASR) ≥ 2 pointed towards an improvement of tremor after consuming alcohol. Discussion: We confirmed that the alcohol responsiveness test of Knudsen et al. is useful in determining objective alcohol responsivity. We established a significantly reduced ASR after alcohol consumption in 67% of familial ET patients in our cohort. In the future, a larger population is needed to establish whether familial aggregation of alcohol responsivity occurs in essential tremor patients. Highlights: The test designed by Knudsen et al. effectively established objective alcohol responsiveness outside its original research group.We found an objective alcohol response in 67% of our familial ET cohort.Subjective VAS scores were significantly lower after alcohol consumption.There was no correlation between the objective and subjective alcohol responsiveness.Familial aggregation of alcohol responsiveness in ET should be studied in a larger cohort.

Early re-emerging tremor after MRgFUS thalamotomy: case-control analysis of procedural and imaging features.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify possible prognostic factors determining early tremor relapse after Magnetic Resonance guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (MRgFUS) thalamotomy in patients with essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods: Nine patients (six ET and three PD) who underwent Vim MRgFUS thalamotomy in a single institution and developed early re-emergent tremor were analyzed. A control group of patients matched pairwise for sex, pathology, age, disease duration, and skull density ratio (SDR) was selected to compare the technical-procedural data and MR imaging evidence. MR imaging findings compared between groups included lesion shape and volume in multiparametric sequences, as well as Fractiona Anisotropy (FA) and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values derived from Diffusion Tensor Imaging Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DTI) and Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) sequences. Results: We did not find statistically significant differences in gender and age between the two groups. Technical and procedural parameters were also similar in both treatment groups. In MRI analysis, we found lesions of similar size but with greater caudal extension in the control group with stable outcomes compared to patients with tremor relapse. Conclusion: In our analysis of early recurrences after thalamotomy with focused ultrasound, there were neither technical and procedural differences nor prognostic factors related to lesion size or ablation temperatures. Greater caudal extension of the lesion in patients without recurrence might suggest the importance of spatial consolidation during treatment.

Analysis of alpha-synuclein harvested from intracranial instruments used in deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease.

Alpha-synuclein (αSyn) forms pathologic aggregates in Parkinson's disease (PD) and is implicated in mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration. While pathologic αSyn has been extensively studied, there is currently no method to evaluate αSyn within the brains of living patients. Patients with PD are often treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery in which surgical instruments are in direct contact with neuronal tissue; herein, we describe a method by which tissue is purified from DBS surgical instruments in PD and essential tremor (ET) patients and demonstrate that αSyn is robustly detected. 24 patients undergoing DBS surgery for PD (17 patients) or ET (7 patients) were enrolled; from patient samples, 81.2 ± 44.8 µg protein (n=15) is able to be purified, with immunoblot assays specific for αSyn reactive in all tested samples. Light microscopy revealed axons and capillaries as the primary components of purified tissue (n=3). Further analysis was conducted using western blot, demonstrating that truncated αSyn (1-125 αSyn) was significantly increased in PD (n=5) compared to ET (n=3), in which αSyn misfolding is not expected (0.64 ± 0.25 vs. 0.25 ± 0.12, P = 0.046), thus showing that pathologic αSyn can be reliably purified from living PD patients with this method.

Ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus, dentatorubrothalamic tract, and caudal zona incerta: stimulation of which structure provides ongoing tremor control in patients with essential tremor?

OBJECTIVE: Essential tremor (ET) is the most common movement disorder. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) is known to improve symptoms in patients with medication-resistant ET. However, the clinical effectiveness of VIM-DBS may vary, and other targets have been proposed. The authors aimed to investigate whether the same anatomical structure is responsible for tremor control both immediately after VIM-DBS and at later follow-up evaluations. METHODS: Of 68 electrodes from 41 patients with ET, the authors mapped the distances of the active contact from the VIM, the dentatorubrothalamic tract (DRTT), and the caudal zona incerta (cZI) and compared them using Friedman's ANOVA and the Wilcoxon signed-rank follow-up test. The same distances were also compared between the initially planned target and the final implantation site after intraoperative macrostimulation. Finally, the comparison among the three structures was repeated for 16 electrodes whose active contact was changed after a mean 37.5 months follow-up to improve tremor control. RESULTS: After lead implantation, the VIM was statistically significantly closer to the active contact than both the DRTT (p = 0.008) and cZI (p < 0.001). This result did not change if the target was moved based on intraoperative macrostimulation. At the last follow-up, the active contact distance from the VIM was always significantly less than that of the cZI (p < 0.001), but the distance from the DRTT was reduced and even less than the distance from the VIM. CONCLUSIONS: In patients receiving VIM-DBS, the VIM itself is the structure driving the anti-tremor effect and remains more effective than the cZI, even years after implantation. Nevertheless, the role of the DRTT may become more important over time and may help sustain the clinical efficacy when the habituation from the VIM stimulation ensues.

Evaluating functional connectivity differences between DBS ON/OFF states in essential tremor.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus of the thalamus is an effective treatment for essential tremor (ET). We studied 15 â€‹ET patients undergoing DBS to a major input/output tract of the Vim, the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRTt), using resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI) to evaluate connectivity differences between DBS ON and OFF and elucidate significant regions most influential in impacting tremor control and/or concomitant gait ataxia. Anatomical/functional 1.5T MRIs were acquired and replicated for each DBS state. Tremor severity and gait ataxia severity were scored with DBS ON at optimal stimulation parameters and immediately upon DBS OFF. Whole brain analysis was performed using dual regression analysis followed by randomized permutation testing for multiple correction comparison. Regions of interest (ROI) analysis was also performed. All 15 patients had tremor improvement between DBS ON/OFF (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Whole brain analysis revealed significant connectivity changes between states in the left pre-central gyrus and left supplemental motor area. Group analysis of ROIs revealed that, with threshold p â€‹< â€‹0.05, in DBS ON vs. OFF both tremor duration and tremor improvement were significantly correlated to changes in connectivity. A sub-group analysis of patients with greater ataxia had significantly decreased functional connectivity between multiple ROIs in the cortex and cerebellum when DBS was ON compared to OFF. Stimulation of the DRTt and concordant improvement of tremor resulted in connectivity changes seen in multiple regions outside the motor network; when combined with both structural and electrophysiologic connectivity, this may help to serve as a biomarker to improve DBS targeting and possibly predict outcome.

Clinical neurophysiology in the treatment of movement disorders: IFCN handbook chapter.

In this review, different aspects of the use of clinical neurophysiology techniques for the treatment of movement disorders are addressed. First of all, these techniques can be used to guide neuromodulation techniques or to perform therapeutic neuromodulation as such. Neuromodulation includes invasive techniques based on the surgical implantation of electrodes and a pulse generator, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) or spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on the one hand, and non-invasive techniques aimed at modulating or even lesioning neural structures by transcranial application. Movement disorders are one of the main areas of indication for the various neuromodulation techniques. This review focuses on the following techniques: DBS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), low-intensity transcranial electrical stimulation, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), and focused ultrasound (FUS), including high-intensity magnetic resonance-guided FUS (MRgFUS), and pulsed mode low-intensity transcranial FUS stimulation (TUS). The main clinical conditions in which neuromodulation has proven its efficacy are Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and essential tremor, mainly using DBS or MRgFUS. There is also some evidence for Tourette syndrome (DBS), Huntington's disease (DBS), cerebellar ataxia (tDCS), and axial signs (SCS) and depression (rTMS) in PD. The development of non-invasive transcranial neuromodulation techniques is limited by the short-term clinical impact of these techniques, especially rTMS, in the context of very chronic diseases. However, at-home use (tDCS) or current advances in the design of closed-loop stimulation (tACS) may open new perspectives for the application of these techniques in patients, favored by their easier use and lower rate of adverse effects compared to invasive or lesioning methods. Finally, this review summarizes the evidence for keeping the use of electromyography to optimize the identification of muscles to be treated with botulinum toxin injection, which is indicated and widely performed for the treatment of various movement disorders.

Episodic mandibular tremor in dogs: an idiopathic movement disorder or a manifestation of pain.

OBJECTIVE: Episodic mandibular tremor (EMT), manifested as teeth chattering, is not well described in dogs. The aim of this study was to describe clinical signs, MRI findings, and outcome of dogs with EMT. ANIMALS: 11 dogs retrospectively and 31 dogs in an online survey. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study of dogs with EMT between 2018 and 2023 and prospective online questionnaire open to owners of pets with teeth chattering. RESULTS: All dogs had rapid and short-lasting (< 1 minute) episodes of EMT in the absence of other neurological signs. Lip smacking occasionally accompanied the tremor in 5 of 11 (45.5%) hospital dog cases. Excitement was a common trigger in 14 of 31 (45.2%) dogs from the survey. Cavalier King Charles Spaniel was the most common breed in both clinical and survey populations. Median age at presentation was 3 years for both hospital cases and the survey dogs. A concurrent medical condition was present in 8 of 11 (72.7%) hospital cases and 20 of 31 (64.5%) survey dogs. In 3 hospital dogs that underwent further investigations, no brain disease was present. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: EMT and its clinical features are presented for the first time, shedding light on a clinical sign that might resemble an idiopathic movement disorder or a manifestation of pain in dogs.