Black identity and internal health attributions of second generation black immigrant women.

OBJECTIVE: Despite second generation Black immigrants being a rapidly growing population, they are often overlooked in health attribution research that treats Black populations as a monolithic group. Very few studies focus on how discrimination, societal pressure, and racial identity play a role in the health attributions of Black immigrant women. Even fewer studies have examined this relationship solely with second generation Black immigrant women. Research has shown, however, that increased racial and ethnic identity but decreased experiences with racism are related to higher internal health attributions in Black populations. Thus, we addressed this dearth in research in the current study by examining the relationship between racial centrality, racism stress, and internal health attributions in a sample of 123 second generation Black immigrant women. DESIGN: Health attributions were assessed using the Illness Attribution Scale, racism stress using the Schedule of Racist Events, and racial centrality using the Multidimensional Inventory of Black Identity. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to test the hypotheses that lower levels of racism stress, but higher ratings of racial centrality would relate to higher scores of internal health attributions. RESULTS: A positive relationship was found between racial centrality and internal health attributions but not racism stress. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that stronger affirmations with Black identity are associated with a greater importance of the causes of illness to be within one's perceived control for second generation Black immigrant women, which highlights the importance of examining wthin-group differences via collective identity measures to better explain health attribution behavioirs.

Disparities in Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Analysis of Hispanic and Non-Hispanic White Individuals.

Objective: We sought to examine possible differences in BCC characteristics and treatment patterns between two matched cohorts of Hispanic White and non-Hispanic White individuals. Methods: In this single institution, retrospective matched cohort study, data from patients with biopsy proven BCC from June 2005 to May 2022 was collected. Demographic, BCC, and treatment characteristics were compared between Hispanic White and non-Hispanic White individuals using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, for continuous and ordinal variables, and Fisher's exact test, for categorical variables. Results: A total of 604 individuals with a diagnosis of biopsy-proven BCC were matched in a 1:1 fashion by age (± 0 years) and sex, based on self-identified ethnicity as Hispanic or non-Hispanic. Since all patients self-identified as White race, the two cohorts were labeled Hispanic White (n=302) and non-Hispanic White (n=302). The most frequent location for BCC was in the H area, 129 [42.7%] White Hispanic group vs 132 [43.7%] White non-Hispanic group (p = 0.87). In both Hispanic White and non-Hispanic White groups, the predominant subtype of BCC was the nodular (149 [50.2%] vs 164 [54.7%], p = 0.25). The median BCC pre-operative size in the Hispanic White group was 0.9 cm, whereas in the non-Hispanic White group, it was 1.0 cm (p = 0.004). Furthermore, the MMS defect size in the Hispanic White group had a median of 1.3 cm, while in the non-Hispanic White group, it was 1.6 cm (p < 0.001). Limitations: Retrospective design, single-center study, and self-reported race and ethnicity. Conclusion: Both groups had similar demographics, tumor features, treatments, and post-operative complications. Notably, preoperative lesion and MMS defect sizes were larger in non-Hispanic Whites than in Hispanic Whites, contrary to expectations. Despite assumptions of poorer skin cancer outcomes among Hispanics, our findings indicate increased sizes in non-Hispanic Whites. Given the diversity in genetics and clinical traits within ethnicities, especially Hispanics, more research is needed for precise insights into disease outcomes across diverse backgrounds.

Racial Disparities in Incident and Recurrent Cardiovascular Events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Most prior studies of cardiovascular (CVD) events have focused on incident events. We analyzed differences by race/ethnicity in incident and recurrent CVD events in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis from baseline in 2000-2002 through 2019 using joint and multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling. Among 6,814 men and women aged 45-85 years without known CVD at enrollment, during median follow up of 17.7 years, 1206 incident and 695 recurrent CVD events were observed; 891 individuals with a non-fatal incident event were at risk for recurrent events. Rates of combined incident and recurrent CVD events among Black, White, Chinese, and Hispanic participants were 16.8, 18.6, 13.3, and 19.3 per 1000 person-years, respectively. First recurrent CVD event rates in Black, White, Chinese, and Hispanic participants were 87.7, 68.7, 78.1, and 80.7 per 1000 person-years, respectively. Revascularization rates were lower in Black versus White participants (3.8 vs 6.4 per 1000 person-years, p<0.0001). Adjusted hazard for CVD mortality was higher for Black vs. White participants (hazard ratio 1.85; 95% CI: 1.03, 3.29). In this multi-ethnic cohort, Black participants had a lower or similar rate of incident and recurrent CVD events, lower rate of revascularization, and higher rate of fatal CVD compared to White participants.

In-Center Hemodialysis Experiences Among Latinx Adults: A Qualitative Study.

Rationale & Objective: Latinx individuals are more likely to start and remain receiving in-center hemodialysis, over home dialysis, than non-Latinx White individuals. The objective of our study was to understand the drivers of sustained in-center dialysis and deterrents of switching to home dialysis use for Latinx individuals receiving in-center dialysis. Study Design: This qualitative study used semistructured one-on-one interviews. Setting and Participants: Latinx adults receiving in-center hemodialysis therapy at 2 urban dialysis clinics in Denver, Colorado between November 2021 and March 2023. Exposures: In-center hemodialysis, Latinx ethnicity. Outcomes: Qualitative. Analytical Approach: Interviews were analyzed with thematic analysis using inductive coding. Theoretical framework development used principles of grounded theory. Results: In total, 25 Latinx adults (10 [40%] female and 15 [60%] male) receiving in-center hemodialysis therapy participated. One theme demonstrated that Latinx individuals experienced hardship with in-center dialysis but used Latinx values to persevere: Psychosocial resilience using Latinx cultural values (faith and spiritual coping, belief in predestination and acceptance, optimism and positive attitude toward treatment, and positive relationships with health care professionals and peers). Two themes illustrate barriers to starting or switching to home dialysis: Insufficient knowledge of kidney replacement therapy (lack of awareness of kidney disease, lack of preparation for dialysis) and Barriers to patient-centered decision making in dialysis treatment (lack of peer perspective to guide dialysis decision making, fear and apprehension of home dialysis, lack of socioemotional support, perception of housing issues). Limitations: Most participants were from the same geographic area and country of origin, and some may have been uninsured because of immigration status. Conclusions: As Latinx people are less likely to be treated with home dialysis modalities, this study offers important context as to what factors drove sustained in-center dialysis use for this population. Coping mechanisms that promoted resilience with in-center dialysis treatment motivated individuals to remain on in-center hemodialysis, and positive dialysis relationships in the dialysis center strengthened this experience. Switching to home dialysis is hindered by lack of knowledge as well as lack of patient-centered dialysis decision making. Understanding the drivers of sustained in-center hemodialysis use for Latinx individuals is important for future efforts at improving patient-centered education, framing conversations around modality choice, and care for this population.

Latinx individuals are more likely to receive in-center hemodialysis over home dialysis (peritoneal and home hemodialysis) compared with non-Latinx White individuals. This study interviewed Latinx individuals undergoing in-center hemodialysis in Denver, Colorado. Coping mechanisms driving by a cultural belief system of faith, fatalism, and optimism encouraged staying on in-center hemodialysis, and patients enjoyed the social element of hemodialysis. We found lack of awareness and preparation for kidney disease influenced starting and remaining on in-center dialysis. Switching to home dialysis was hindered by a fear, as well as lack of support and housing issues. Understanding these factors is crucial for improving education and conversations about dialysis options for Latinx individuals, particularly those already receiving in-center dialysis.

Racial and ethnic disparities in dupilumab for pediatric atopic dermatitis in Florida.

Background: Dupilumab is an mAb that has been shown to decrease symptoms and severity of atopic dermatitis (AD). It was approved for use in adolescents and children in a stepwise manner from 2019 to 2022. Racial and ethnic disparities have been described in access to emerging therapies in many conditions, including treatment with dupilumab for AD in adult patients. Objective: We sought to assess racial and ethnic disparities in moderate to severe AD treatment with dupilumab in the pediatric population. Methods: This retrospective study identified 12,918 patients with AD aged 0 to 17 years who had at least a 6-month follow-up period between January 2020 and September 2023. The primary end point of dupilumab prescription was compared between racial and ethnic groups and a reference group of non-Hispanic White patients while adjusting for confounders. Results: Among the patients, 18.1% were Black, 40.5% Hispanic, 28.9% non-Hispanic White, and 12.4% Other race. Black (odds ratio, 0.43; P = .006) and Hispanic (odds ratio, 0.46; P < .001) patients had significantly lower odds of receiving dupilumab compared with the reference group. Conclusions: This study may indicate a racial and ethnic disparity negatively affecting access to treatment with dupilumab for Black and Hispanic children and adolescents with AD. Because previous studies have not indicated decreased severity of AD in these patient populations, less frequent use is likely due to other underlying factors such as differential access to care, cultural differences, language barriers, and socioeconomic factors. The contributing factors must be further identified and addressed to ensure health equity in pediatric AD.

Rates of Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Athlete-Specific Sports Medicine Research: A Systematic Review.

Background: Race- and ethnicity-based differences in treatment access and outcomes have been reported in the orthopaedic sports medicine literature. However, the rate at which race and ethnicity are reported and incorporated into the statistical analysis of sports medicine studies remains unclear. Purpose: To determine the rate at which race and ethnicity are reported and analyzed in athlete-specific sports medicine literature. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, articles published by the 3 journals of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine between 2017 and 2021 were considered for inclusion. Original sports medicine research studies that focused on athletes were included. Outcome measures included reporting and analysis of patient demographics (age, sex, race, ethnicity). Studies that included demographic variables in a multivariate analysis or that performed a race-/ethnicity-based stratified analyses were considered to have analyzed that variable. Studies that reported and/or analyzed patient demographics were examined. Chi-square tests were performed to determine statistical significance. Results: A total of 5140 publications were screened, and 842 met the inclusion criteria. Age and sex were well reported (84.1% and 87.0%, respectively), while race (3.8%) and ethnicity (2.0%) were poorly reported. There was no difference in rates of reporting age, sex, race, or ethnicity between the American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM), the Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), or Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach (Sports Health). The rate of analysis was also calculated as a percentage of the studies that reported that variable. Of the studies that reported age, 38.5% analyzed age. Using this method, 26.2% of studies analyzed sex, 40.6% analyzed race, and 17.6% analyzed ethnicity. Although there was no difference in the overall rate at which studies from the 3 journals analyzed ethnicity, Sports Health studies analyzed age (P = .044), sex (P = .001), and race (P = .027) more frequently than studies published in AJSM and OJSM. Of the studies that analyzed race, most of those studies (8/13, 61.5%) found significant race-based differences in reported outcomes. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated that race and ethnicity are poorly reported and analyzed in athlete-specific sports medicine literature, despite the fact that a majority of studies analyzing race found significant differences between racial groups. Improved reporting of race and ethnicity can determine whether race- and ethnicity-based differences exist in patient interventions to ameliorate disparities in patient outcomes.

U.S. Adolescents' Exposure to Alcohol Marketing: Self-Reported Exposure on the Internet and Traditional Media.

Introduction: Youth exposure to alcohol marketing is a risk factor for underage drinking. In the U.S., research documents the impact of youth exposure to alcohol marketing through traditional media (e.g., TV, radio) on underage drinking, with less known about digital alcohol marketing exposure. This study aims to examine adolescents' self-reported exposure to alcohol marketing on various types of media, including the internet, by their demographic characteristics. Methods: Data were from the 2021 YouthStyles survey administered by Porter Novelli. Adolescents aged 12-17 years (N=833) completed this national online survey. Two multivariable logistic regression models were conducted in October 2022-April 2023 to examine exposure to alcohol marketing on 2 categories of media (watching TV, streaming videos, or going to the movies or browsing the internet). Models included race/ethnicity, age, gender, and past-week number of hours using the media category being assessed. Results: More than half of the U.S. adolescents reported being sometimes or often exposed to alcohol marketing. Hispanic adolescents had approximately 1.6 greater adjusted odds than non-Hispanic White adolescents of reporting sometimes or often being exposed to alcohol marketing while watching TV, streaming videos, or going to the movies and while browsing the internet. As adolescents' age increased, self-reported alcohol marketing exposure also increased for both media categories assessed. Conclusions: Monitoring alcohol marketing exposure, including exposure on the internet, can inform efforts for reducing racial/ethnic disparities in underage drinking risk factors.

Self-identified Race and Ethnicity and How this is Perceived: Associations with the Physical and Mental Health of Incarcerated Individuals.

OBJECTIVES: The singular focus on self-identified race and ethnicity in health disparities research may not fully convey the individual and structural components of experiencing race in society, or in a racialized context such as prison. Processes of racialization create boundaries between incarcerated individuals and regulate their daily interactions and access to resources, with possible effects on well-being. However, the relationship between perceived race and health has not been examined within the imprisoned population. DESIGN: We used data from the 2016 Survey of Prison Inmates (n = 23,010) to assess how self-identified race, perceived race, and the discordance between racial self-identification and perception were associated with the physical (number of chronic conditions) and mental health (psychological distress) of American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, Black, Latino, White, and multiracial incarcerated individuals. RESULTS: Reported perception as Latino was associated with better mental and physical health relative to perception as White. Perceived Latino identity was more strongly associated with physical and mental health than a Latino self-identity. Reported perception as Black was associated with less psychological distress than perception as White, but this relationship dissipated after accounting for self-identified race. In contrast, perceived and self-identified multiracial incarcerated individuals reported worse health than their White counterparts. Having a discordant (vs. concordant) racial identity was associated with worse physical and mental health among imprisoned persons regardless of race. CONCLUSION: The use of a single, unidimensional measure of race and ethnicity in health disparities research does not fully reveal racialization's influence on health, specifically for those experiencing incarceration.

Subsidized Versus Unsubsidized Senior Housing Communities in PA: A Window on Variation in Health, Function, and Access to Services in Old Age.

Introduction: Independent Living residences for older adults can be divided into two categories and require better definitions for research purposes; the purpose of this manuscript is to provide those definitions and explore variation in provided services and resident characteristics: (a) Subsidized age-based housing (55+) (Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) housing units for low-income adults), and (b) non-subsidized age-based housing. Methods: Residents in the two settings were compared: 37 subsidized locations (p = 289 residents) and 19 non-subsidized (p = 208). Aging support services in each housing type were quantified. Results: Subsidized residents are more likely to be female (84.6% vs. 70.2%, p = .0002) and have fair-poor health (36.5% vs. 12.5%, p < .0001), frequent pain (28.4% vs. 12.8%, p < .0001), and fair-poor mobility (37.5% vs. 23.5%, p = .0298). Non-subsidized locations are more likely to offer support services; on average, residents are older (mean age 83vs. 75; p < .0001) and white (97.6% vs. 69.2%, p < .0001). Conclusion: Significant differences exist between populations living in subsidized and non-subsidized housing, suggesting the effect of cumulative disadvantage over the lifespan; populations in poorer health have access to fewer services. Research is needed to explore generalizability on a national level.

Race and ethnicity expression in reproductive endocrinology and infertility research studies compared with other obstetrics and gynecology subspecialty studies.

Objective: To compare the percentage of patients per race and ethnicity group in the most cited reproductive endocrinology and infertility studies with the most cited studies in 3 other obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN) subspecialties: gynecologic oncology, urogynecology (URO), and maternal-fetal medicine. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Not applicable. Patients: Patients previously recruited in research studies. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Expression of minorities in research studies. Results: Individual searches were conducted for the most cited articles in OBGYN subspecialties until 50 studies met the inclusion criteria for each OBGYN subspecialty. A total of 29,821,148 patients were included and compared between subspecialty and US Census data. Reproductive endocrinology and infertility studies had the highest percentage of White patients (80.5%), although URO studies had fewer Black patients (6.6%) compared with other subspecialties. Reproductive endocrinology and infertility studies had the lowest percentage of Hispanic patients (4.9%), yet more Asian patients were present in URO studies (3.3%) than in other subspecialties. Gynecologic oncology studies were most likely to have missing data in race expression (19.3%). Comparing study types, retrospective studies had the highest percentage of White patients (61.9%), although randomized controlled trials had the lowest expression of Hispanic patients (8.8%). Conclusions: Reproductive endocrinology and infertility studies featured the highest rates of White patients compared with other OBGYN subspecialty studies, although URO studies had the lowest rates of Black patients. Randomized controlled trials featured higher rates of White patients and lower levels of Hispanic patients compared with US Census data.

Investigating inequalities in patient outcomes for first-episode psychosis.

BACKGROUND: Understanding inequalities in outcomes between demographic groups is a necessary step in addressing them in clinical care. Inequalities in treatment uptake between demographic groups may explain disparities in outcomes in people with first-episode psychosis (FEP). AIMS: To investigate disparities between broad demographic groups in symptomatic improvement in patients with FEP and their relationship to treatment uptake. METHOD: We used data from 6813 patients from the 2021-2022 National Clinical Audit of Psychosis data-set. Data were grouped by category type to obtain mean outcomes before adjustment to see whether disparities in outcomes remained after differences in treatment uptake had been accounted for. After matching, the average effect of each demographic variable in terms of outcome change was calculated. Moderator effects on specific treatments were investigated using interaction terms in a regression model. RESULTS: Observational results showed that patients aged 18-24 years were less likely to improve in outcome, unless adjusted for intervention uptake. Patients classified as Black and Black British were less likely to improve in outcome (moderation effect 0.04, 95% CI 0-0.07) after adjusting for treatment take-up and demographic factors. Regression analysis showed the general positive effect of supported employment interventions in improving outcomes (coefficient -0.13, 95% CI -0.07 to -0.18, P < 0.001), and moderator analysis suggested targeting particular groups for interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Inequalities in treatment uptake and psychotic symptom outcome of FEP by social and demographic factors require monitoring over time. Our analysis provides a framework for monitoring health inequalities across national clinical audits in the UK.

Motivators and Barriers to Joining a Lifestyle Change Program for Disease Prevention.

Introduction: Lifestyle change programs (LCPs) are effective in helping people adopt healthy lifestyles and maintain healthy weight for disease prevention. LCPs are known to be underutilized, but the nuances surrounding women's interest in using these programs for disease prevention need to be further explored so that enrollment and retention in these programs can be improved. Methods: The purpose of this study was to explore women's interest in and knowledge of LCPs and identify their motivators and barriers to joining these types of programs through a survey. The survey was administered both online and in person. The survey had 22 questions and included demographics, medical and family history, knowledge and interest in LCPs, and barriers and motivators to participating in LCPs. Results: Participants in this study included 1,606 women from 40 to 74 years of age. We found that respondents had limited knowledge about the benefits of LCPs in reducing risks of specific diseases, such as breast cancer and osteoarthritis. Respondents reported low-to-moderate interest in LCPs. We found that their interest in these programs was negatively associated with their weekly physical activity and positively associated with their body mass index (BMI) and the number of reported barriers to joining LCPs. The most common barriers cited were cost, location, time, and too many meetings. In addition, we found that respondents who had or were unsure about their family history of diabetes were more interested in LCPs compared with individuals who had no family history of diabetes. We did not find significant differences in respondent interest in LCPs across ethnicity. Conclusions: Our study suggests that specific barriers to LCPs-including women's knowledge of such programs-will need to be addressed before enrollment and retention in LCPs are increased.

Breastfeeding Behaviors by Race/Ethnicity and Foreign-Born Status in the United States: An Analysis of the U.S. National Survey of Children's Health.

Objective: The foreign-born population is growing in the United States, but no nationally representative statistics of breastfeeding behavior disaggregated by race/ethnicity and foreign-born status have been published in recent years. This study examines breastfeeding initiation, any breastfeeding, and exclusive breastfeeding at 3 and 6 months among foreign-born and U.S.-born Non-Hispanic (NH) Black, NH White, and Hispanic women in the United States. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study utilizing years 2021 and 2022 of the National Survey of Children's Health. Sample children identified as NH White, NH Black, and Hispanic who were 6 months to 5 years old and residing with their biological or adoptive mother were included (n = 27,818). Results: Foreign-born women in all racial/ethnic groups (NH Black, NH White, and Hispanic) had significantly higher odds of any breastfeeding at 6 months relative to U.S.-born NH White women. However, they did not have significantly different odds of exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months relative to U.S.-born NH White women. U.S.-born Hispanic women had rates of exclusive breastfeeding for 6 months (23.2%) that were much closer to U.S.-born NH Black women (23.4%) than to foreign-born Hispanic women (29.4%) or U.S.-born White women (32.1%). Conclusions: The large percentage of foreign-born women who reported some breastfeeding at 6 months indicates a strong commitment to breastfeeding and may be a leverage point for future exclusive breastfeeding interventions among this group. U.S.-born Hispanic women appear to be struggling with exclusive breastfeeding and may need additional interventions.

Patient-Reported Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Results From the National Health and Wellness Survey.

Background: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory condition characterized by chronic, disabling gastrointestinal symptoms that can have detrimental effects on psychological, social, and professional quality of life. Few studies have examined patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and economic outcomes among individuals with varying UC severity and across different racial/ethnic groups. Methods: This cross-sectional study assessed sociodemographic data, PROs, and economic outcomes for participants from the National Health and Wellness Survey (2018, 2019, and 2020) with UC. Multivariable analyses were used to assess the association of self-reported UC severity and race/ethnicity with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity and activity impairment (WPAI), healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and medical costs. Results: This study included 1500 participants with UC (1150 non-Hispanic White, 99 non-Hispanic Black, and 251 Hispanic). Moderate/severe disease was associated with significantly worse HRQoL and WPAI, greater HCRU, and higher direct medical costs than mild UC. Compared with non-Hispanic White participants, non-Hispanic Black participants reported better HRQoL, whereas Hispanic participants reported more HCRU and higher medical costs. Race/ethnicity significantly interacted with UC severity level in predicting labor force participation. Conclusions: Participants with moderate/severe disease had worse outcomes than those with mild UC. Additionally, racial/ethnic differences were found in HRQoL, employment, WPAI, HCRU, and direct medical costs. Notably, Hispanic participants showed distinct patterns, particularly in how disease severity influenced employment outcomes. Further research is needed to better understand the differential burden among patients across racial/ethnic groups.

Does Ethnicity Moderate the Union Dissolution Penalty for Women? A Register-based Analysis of Changes in Income Components.

Union dissolution has severe consequences for women's economic well-being. Theoretical work links these consequences to ethnic inequality. Ethnic groups vary in terms of separation rates, female employment, repartnering trajectories, kin support, and reliance on welfare benefits. The current study examines whether ethnicity moderates the dissolution penalty. To do so, the authors draw on register data, covering women from five major ethnic groups in the Netherlands: Dutch, Antillean, Surinamese, Moroccan, and Turkish. The authors describe women's income trajectories from 1 year before to 5 years after union dissolution. Using decomposition techniques, changes in household income are decomposed into changes in six underlying income sources (i.e., earnings, benefits, alimony, partner income, and coresident family income). The results show that ethnicity moderates the dissolution penalty and, especially, the contribution of the various income sources when recovering from dissolution.

Exploring racial and ethnic disparities in the hidradenitis suppurativa patient disease journey: Results from a real-world study in Europe and the USA.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an inflammatory skin disease associated with high morbidity and disability that has limited treatment options. People from racial and ethnic minority groups may experience greater disease severity and delay to diagnosis. This study assessed the impact of race/ethnicity on HS diagnosis and management in real-world clinical settings. Data were derived from the Adelphi Real World Hidradenitis Suppurativa Disease Specific Programme, a survey of dermatologists and their consulting HS patients in five European countries and the USA in 2020/2021. Dermatologists returned demographic and clinical data, and treatment goals and satisfaction for their next five to seven consulting patients. Patients completed a questionnaire on disease history and diagnosis, disease burden, and treatment satisfaction. Groups were compared with bivariate tests. In total, 312 physicians returned data on 1787 patients; 57.6% were female and 77.7% White. People from racial and ethnic minority groups were younger than White patients (32.9 ± 11.6 vs. 34.9 ± 12.4, mean ± standard deviation) and reported symptoms at a younger age (23.3 ± 10.8 vs. 26.2 ± 11.1), but their time to first consultation was longer than for White patients (2.6 ± 5.7 vs. 1.2 ± 2.5 years). People from racial and ethnic minority groups took longer to receive a correct diagnosis following first consultation (2.7 ± 5.3 vs. 1.5 ± 4.1 years) and were more likely to be misdiagnosed with boils (73.5% vs. 40.4%). People from racial and ethnic minority groups had a greater disease awareness at diagnosis and reported wanting greater support. People from racial and ethnic minority groups reported a greater impact on life, more severe pain, and a greater level of activity impairment in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: General Health (27.0 ± 25.2 vs. 20.0 ± 20.6). All P values were ≤0.05. These data show evidence of delayed diagnosis and higher HS symptom burden amongst people from racial and ethnic minority groups, highlighting health disparities in HS.

Health disparities and injection drug use behaviors among adults with and without disabilities in the National Survey on drug use and health, 2015-2019.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the prevalence of injection drug use in people with disabilities (PWD) when compared by disability type and to other adults without disabilities. OBJECTIVE OR HYPOTHESIS: The prevalence of past-year injection drug use will be higher in adults with a reported disability than adults without any reported disability. METHODS: This study consisted of secondary analyses of data from the 2015-2019 National Survey of Drug Use and Health. The analytic sample comprised 214,505 US adults. Self-reported past-year injection drug use represented the outcome of interest. Disability status and socioeconomic characteristics were conceptualized as predictors, and sex and age were used as controls. RESULTS: Past-year prevalence of self-reported injection drug use was 0.24 % (95 % CI, 0.22-0.27) in adults without a disability but 0.66 % (95 % CI, 0.59-0.73) in adults with a disability. All disability types examined were associated with increased odds of reporting past-year injection drug use, but the strongest association was observed for disability related to difficulty concentrating (AOR, 4.90; 95 % CI, 3.92-6.14). Adjusted odds of past-year methamphetamine injection were more than three times as high in adults with a disability, compared to those without a disability (AOR, 3.21; 95 % CI, 2.37-4.33) and more than two times as high in adults with a disability for cocaine injection (AOR, 2.77; 95 % CI, 1.84-4.15). CONCLUSION: Disability status is associated with injection of various types of drugs, and a variety of disability types are associated with higher odds of injection drug use.

Pandemic changes in U.S. contraceptive use: National survey estimates reveal significant differences by demographic subgroups.

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic brought multiple simultaneous consequences, with high potential to change fertility-related behaviors. We use nationally representative sex and contraceptive use event history calendar measures to demonstrate person-specific changes in contraceptive use after the pandemic, showing differences across demographic subgroups. STUDY DESIGN: We use data from the first nationally representative web survey of U.S. fertility, fielded in 2020-2022: the American Family Health Study (AFHS). Using responses from 1357 female-identifying respondents ages 18-49, we analyze 26,274 person-months of sex and contraceptive use data spanning directly before and after the beginning of the pandemic to detect change. RESULTS: Individual-level hazard models of starting and stopping contraception revealed no pandemic-related changes in starting contraception, but significant reductions in the rate of stopping contraception for specific subgroups. Hispanic females reduced their rates of stopping contraceptive use during the pandemic (lowering their odds of stopping use by 71%), ultimately behaving more similarly to individuals from other racial or ethnic subgroups. Additionally, those aged 41 and older significantly reduced their rates of stopping contraceptive use (lowering their odds of stopping use by 78%) relative to other age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Sudden large-scale health policy changes can produce significant changes in contraceptive use behaviors. The COVID-19 changes interacted with race, ethnicity, and age to produce different changes in contraceptive behaviors among different subgroups of the U.S.