Cost minimisation analyses of birth care in low-risk women in Norway: a comparison between planned home birth and birth in a standard obstetric unit.

BACKGROUND: Evidence exists that planned home births for low-risk women in settings in which they have access to hospital transfer if needed are safe. The costs of planned home births, compared to low-risk births in obstetric units, are not clear. The aim of this study was to compare costs associated with hospital births versus home births under different home birth organizations. METHODS: We performed a cost minimisation analysis (CMA) based on decision-analytic modelling while assuming that health outcomes were not affected by place of birth. Estimations of resource use were mainly based on three existing Norwegian datasets: (1) women with planned home births (n = 354), (2) women with planned home births (n = 482) of which 63 were transferred to a hospital, and (3) women with planned births in a hospital (n = 1550). RESULTS: Planned home birth costs 45.9% (credibility interval [CrI] 39.1-54.2) of a low-risk birth at a hospital. For planned home birth, the birth was the costliest activity (32.1%). The costs for planned home birth were estimated to be €1872 (CrI 1694-2071) and included hospitalisations for some. Costs for only those with actual home birth was €1353 (CrI 1244-1469). Costs of a birth, including possible birth-related complications, in low-risk women in a hospital was €4077 (CrI 3575-4615). When including the costs of being on call for one woman at a time, a planned home birth costs €5,531 (CrI 5,171-5,906), which is 135.7% (CrI 117.7-156.8) of low-risk births at a hospital. When organizing midwives in the on call teams for multiple women at a time, a planned home birth costs € 2,842 (CrI 2,647-3,053), which is 69.7% (CrI 60.3-80.9) of a low-risk birth in a hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Home birth can be cost-effective if the midwives who facilitate home births are organised into larger groups, or they work for hospitals that also facilitate home births. A model in which midwives work separately or in pairs to assist with a home birth and are on call for one birth at a time may not be cost-effective.

Does living in major towns favor institutional delivery in Somalia?

Background: In developing countries, institutional delivery is a key proven intervention that reduces maternal mortality and can reduce maternal deaths by approximately 16%-33%. In Somalia, only 32% of births are delivered in a health facility with the assistance of a skilled healthcare provider. We aimed to investigate the factors hindering women from giving birth at healthcare facilities in major towns in Somalia, where most of the health facilities in the country are concentrated. Methods: A community-based health survey was carried out in 11 major towns in Somalia between October and December 2021. A structured and pretested questionnaire was used to collect data from 430 women who gave birth in the last five years. Women were recruited through convenient sampling. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, and binary and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% CI were estimated to assess the associations. Results: The overall prevalence of institutional delivery was 57%. Approximately 38% of women living in Mogadishu and 53% living in another ten towns give birth at home. Women who had poor knowledge of the importance of health facility delivery had nearly four times higher odds of delivering at home (AOR 3.64 CI: 1.49-8.93). Similarly, those who did not receive antenatal care (AOR 2.5, CI: 1.02-6.39) and those who did not receive a consultation on the place of delivery (AOR 2.15, CI: 1.17-3.94) were more likely to give birth at home. The reasons for home delivery included financial reasons, the long distance to the health facility, and the fact that it was easier to give birth at home. Conclusion: The study found that home delivery is high in major towns in Somalia and is associated with a lack of understanding of the importance of health facility delivery, not using ANC, and not receiving consultancy about where to give birth. Primary health care should strengthen information, education, and communication activities. Since the health care system in Somalia is overwhelmingly private, the government may consider access to free and within-reach ANC and health facility delivery for women and girls from families who cannot pay the ANC and childbirth delivery cost.

Validation of the Greek version of Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale.

INTRODUCTION: Ensuring expectant mothers have the capacity to make well-informed decisions regarding their prenatal care, encompassing medical interventions, and birthing preferences are crucial for fostering favorable health outcomes for both mother and newborn. The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale serves as a commonly utilized tool for evaluating the autonomy of pregnant women in the decision-making processes related to prenatal care and childbirth. The aim of this study is to validate the MADM scale in women who had at least one home childbirth experience in Greece. METHODS: A retrospective online survey collected data from Greek women with home childbirth experience (January 2010 - December 2023). We utilized a self-administered questionnaire and the Greek version of the MADM scale. RESULTS: The study included 162 women, predominantly of Greek nationality (94.4%) and residing in Attica (54%). The MADM scale showed a median score of 38. The confirmatory factor analysis indicated acceptable fit and reliability (comparative fit index, CFI=0.92; Tucker-Lewis index, TLI=0.91; root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA=0.07; Cronbach's α=0.92). Age correlated weakly negatively with the MADM scale score (Spearman's rho= -0.166, p=0.035). Additionally, women attending antenatal preparation courses with a midwife before their first home birth had higher MADM scores (median 39 vs 35, p=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: The study underscores the importance of the MADM scale, demonstrating its reliability and validity for women living in Greece. Younger age and attending antenatal preparation courses with a midwife were associated with higher MADM scores, highlighting education's role in maternal autonomy.

Midwife-attended planned home births versus planned hospital births in Spain: Maternal and neonatal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The debate on the safety and outcomes of home versus hospital births highlights the need for evidence-based evaluations of these birthing settings, particularly in Catalonia where both options are available. AIM: To compare sociodemographic characteristics and maternal and neonatal outcomes between low-risk women opting for home versus hospital births in Catalonia, Spain. METHODS: This observational cross-sectional study analysed 3,463 low-risk births between 2016 and 2018, including 2,713 hospital and 750 home births. Researchers collected sociodemographic data, birthing processes, and outcomes, using statistical analysis to explore differences between the settings. FINDINGS: Notable differences emerged: Women choosing home births typically had higher education levels and were predominantly Spanish. They were 3.43 times more likely to have a spontaneous birth and significantly less likely to undergo instrumental births than those in hospitals. Home births were associated with higher utilization of non-pharmacological analgesia and a more pronounced tendency to iniciate breastfeeding within the first hour post birth and stronger inclination towards breastfeeding. Hospital births, conversely, showed higher use of the lithotomy position and epidural analgesia. There were no significant differences in neonatal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Home births managed by midwives offered better obstetric and neonatal outcomes for low-risk women than hospital births. These results suggest home birth as a safe, viable option that promotes natural birthing processes and reduces medical interventions. The study supports the integration of midwife-led home birth into public health policies, affirming its benefits for maternal and neonatal health.

Home birth in Croatia - a medico-legal perspective today.

In Croatia, the model of obstetrics-midwifery management of childbirth in maternity hospitals is still in effect, and this is how > 99% of Croatian women give birth. However, in my view, midwives are still not sufficiently educated for completely independent work notwithstanding their university education. The Law on Midwifery defined the role of the midwife in home birth without, however, setting out other organisational-communication and professional provisions. Then it began with sporadic midwifery home births of a few per year, which grew quite rapidly, especially with the impact of the Covid-19 virus pandemic, to about 100 out of a total of about 38,000 births that are performed annually in the Republic of Croatia in maternity hospitals. Since the start of planned home births many bad perinatal outcomes have been recorded in hospital maternity wards who have admitted women after such deliveries. These include puerperal sepsis, protracted labour of several days, neglected protracted labour with perinatal asphyxia and aspiration of meconium amniotic fluid and resuscitation of the newborn (who later developed cerebral palsy), severe postpartum haemorrhage with obstetric shock and postpartum hysterectomy, episiotomy infection, and stillbirth at term pregnancy. Therefore, planned home birth in Croatia should now be regarded as an unsafe birth in extraordinary circumstances and the person who takes charge of it must be professionally prepared, educated and have numerous social skills. Most Croatian gynaecologists and obstetricians give support to midwives in their efforts to be professional and independent when at work, including the controlled and legal implementation of the planned home birth. We unreservedly support self-aware midwives to maintain their profession as highly ethical and professional as possible above the wishes of non-professionals who call for autonomy, so that we do not have to discuss such problems of malpractice of Croatian midwifery in the 21st century.

How Do Women Vote: What Women Post About Home Birth Versus Hospital Birth on Popular Social Media Platforms.

INTRODUCTION: The rates of home birth have been increasing; reliance on social media as a source of medical advice and support for patients has also been increasing. This is the first study that directly evaluates birthing people's perceptions, attitudes, and advice about planned home births expressed in public posts and comments on two popular social media platforms - Reddit and TikTok. METHODS: Posts on each platform were searched from January 2017 through July 2022 using the terms "home birth" and "home vs. hospital birth". Included posts were from the United States written in English, with at least 10 comments and 10 upvotes or likes. Up to five themes were collected per post or comment and were categorized as supportive, opposing, or neutral. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) determined that the project did not include human subjects. RESULTS: Collectively, 777 posts and 47,452 comments were evaluated for inclusion; 257 posts and 2,408 comments met the inclusion criteria for analysis. In posts, 69% supported, 20% opposed, and 11% were neutral toward home birth (n = 257). Similarly, in comments, 53% supported, 28% opposed, and 19% were neutral (n = 2,408). Supportive themes included concerns about the safety of hospital delivery and reassurance about home birth safety, enhanced patient control with home deliveries, positive personal stories reinforcing home birth, concerns about excessive interventions in hospital birth, and advice about preparing for home birth. Opposing themes included concerns about risks of home birth, negligence of those attempting it, reassurance that hospital birth does offer women control, greater financial costs of home birth and that medical interventions can be lifesaving. CONCLUSION: These results can help physicians recognize some of the women's concerns about hospital births and what information they may find on social media guiding them as they formulate their birth plans. Overall, this information helps with the goal of balancing patient safety with the need to respect patient autonomy.

Why do women choose home births.

In recent years, the US has seen a significant rise in the rate of planned home births, with a 60 % increase from 2016 to 2023, reaching a total of 46,918. This trend positions the US as the leading developed country in terms of home birth prevalence. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) suggests stringent criteria for selecting candidates for home births, but these guidelines have not been adopted by home birth midwives leading to poor outcomes including increased rates of neonatal morbidity and mortality. This paper explores the motivations behind choosing home births in the US despite the known risks. Studies highlight factors such as the desire for a more natural birth experience, previous negative hospital experiences, and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceptions of hospital safety. We provide new insights into why women choose home births by incorporating insights from Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman's theories on decision-making, suggesting that cognitive biases may significantly influence these decisions. Kahneman's work provides a framework for understanding how biases and heuristics can lead to the underestimation of risks and overemphasis on personal birth experiences. We also provide recommendations ("nudges according to Richard Thaler") to help ensure women have access to clear, balanced information about home births. The development of this publication was assisted by OpenAI's ChatGPT-4, which facilitated the synthesis of literature, interpretation of data, and manuscript drafting. This collaboration underscores the potential of integrating advanced computational tools in academic research, enhancing the efficiency and depth of our analyses.

Decline in home births associated with faster increase in trend of postpartum haemorrhage and manual removal of the placenta.

In this study we explored the relationship between home birth rates and increasing rates of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and manual removal of the placenta (MROP). Data were used from the Dutch national perinatal registry (2000-2014) of women in midwife-led care. Adjusting for place of birth flattened the increasing trends of PPH and MROP. By adjusting for place of birth, the rising trend of MROP among multiparous women disappeared. This suggests that if home birth rates had not declined, PPH and MROP rates might not have increased as much. This study supports policies of enabling women to choose home births.

Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes Following Hospital Transfers of Home Births and Births in Midwife-led Units in Austria.

Introduction: Home births and births in midwife-led units and the associated potential risks are still being debated. An analysis of the quality of results of planned home births and births in midwife-led units which require intrapartum transfer of the mother to hospital provides important information on the quality of processes during births which occur outside hospital settings. The aim of this study was to analyze neonatal and maternal outcomes after the initial plan to deliver at home or in a midwife-led unit had to be abandoned and the mother transferred to hospital. Material and Methods: The method used was an analysis of data obtained from the Austrian Birth Registry. The dataset consisted of singleton term pregnancies delivered in the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 (n = 286056). For the analysis, two groups were created for comparison (planned hospital births and hospital births recorded in the Registry as births originally planned as home births or births in midwife-led units but which required a transfer to hospital) and assessed with regard to previously defined variables. Data were analyzed using frequency description, bivariate analysis and regression models. Results: In Austria, an average of 19% of planned home births have to be discontinued and the mother transferred to hospital. Home births and births in midwife-led units which require transfer of the mother to hospital are associated with higher intervention rates intrapartum, high rates of vacuum delivery, and higher emergency c-section rates compared to planned hospital births. Multifactorial regression analysis showed significantly higher risks of poorer scores for all neonatal outcome parameters (Apgar score, pH value, transfer rate). Conclusion: If a birth which was planned as a home delivery or as a delivery in a midwife-led unit fails to progress because of (possible) anomalies, the midwife must respond and transfer the mother to hospital. This leads to a higher percentage of clinical interventions occurring in hospital. From the perspective of clinical obstetrics, it is understandable, based on the existing data, that giving birth outside a clinical setting cannot be recommended.

Effect of COVID-19 Lockdown on Maternal and Infant Healthcare Services in an Urban Resettlement Area of East Delhi.

INTRODUCTION:  The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has substantially disrupted essential maternal and infant healthcare services due to the diversion of resources. The imposition of lockdown was one of the critical strategies to flatten the curve in several countries, including India. This led to restricted access to pregnancy-related care, immunization services, and had an impact on home-based newborn care. We aimed to determine the effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on institutional deliveries and child healthcare services in a residential community of East Delhi. METHODS: This community-based, comparative study was conducted between January 2021 and August 2022. Seventy-seven families experiencing childbirth during the COVID-19 lockdown period (24th March 2020 to 30th November 2020) were compared with an equivalent number of families having childbirth during the corresponding period preceding the lockdown (24th March 2019 to 30th November 2019). The study involved face-to-face interviews conducted using a pretested and pre-validated interviewer-administered schedule. RESULTS: We found that non-institutional deliveries were substantially higher in the during-lockdown group (n=11, 14.3%) compared to the before-lockdown group (n=1, 1.3%) (OR=12.67 [1.59, 100.73]). Additionally, a significantly lower proportion of pregnant women received a minimum of four antenatal checkups (OR=8.26 [2.71, 25.23]), as well as iron and calcium supplementation during the lockdown. Reasons for non-institutional deliveries primarily included unavailability and denial of delivery services, as well as the fear of exposure to COVID-19 infection, as highlighted in our study. A significantly lower proportion [OR=6.07 (2.56, 14.42)] of children were found to be immunized-for-age, along with a substantial delay in vaccination among those born during the lockdown period. There was a significant decrease in home visits by community health workers during both the antenatal and postnatal periods amidst the lockdown. Moreover, the proportion of children exclusively breastfed for six months was notably lower [OR=2.32 (1.17, 4.63)], and the age until which exclusive breastfeeding was continued was lower in the during-lockdown group. Regarding healthcare-seeking behavior, services were sought by the families of 95.5% of children who fell sick during the lockdown period. Approximately 45.2% of families procured medicines from private health facilities, while about one-third acquired them from non-registered medical practitioners (NRMPs). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 lockdown significantly affected maternal and child healthcare services, leading to adverse outcomes across various crucial aspects. Institutional deliveries, antenatal care, community health worker visits, child immunization, and healthcare-seeking behavior were all adversely affected. In times of natural disasters like pandemics, it is crucial to establish specific provisions ensuring uninterrupted maternal and child healthcare throughout the lockdown. Integrating health education into essential services becomes imperative within the pandemic preparedness plan.

Predictors of planned home birth before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To determine how demographic and clinical predictors of home birth have changed since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. METHODS: Using National Vital Statistics birth certificate data, a retrospective population-based cohort study was performed with planned home births and hospital births among women age ≥18 years during calendar years 2019 (pre-pandemic) and 2021 (pandemic-era). Birth location (planned home birth vs. hospital birth) was analyzed using univariate and multivariable logistic regression, systematically examining the interaction of each demographic and clinical covariate with study year. RESULTS: After exclusions, a total of 6,087,768 birth records were retained for analysis, with the proportion of home births increasing from 0.82 % in 2019 to 1.24 % in 2021 (p<0.001). In the final multivariable logistic regression model of planned home birth, five demographic variables retained a statistically significant interaction with year: race and ethnicity, age, educational attainment, parity, and WIC participation. In each case, demographic differences between those having planned home births and hospital births became smaller (odds ratios closer to 1) in 2021 compared to 2019. CONCLUSIONS: Planned home births increased by more than 50 % during the pandemic, with greater socioeconomic diversity in the pandemic-era home birth cohort. The presence of clinical risk factors remained a strong predictor of hospital birth, with no evidence that pandemic-era home births had a higher clinical risk profile as compared to the pre-pandemic period.

Intrapartum time intervals and transfer of nulliparae from community births to maternity care units in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Over one-third of nulliparae planning births either at home or in freestanding midwife-led birthing centers (community births) in high-income countries are transferred during labor. Perinatal data are reported each year in Germany for women planning community birth. So far, data sets have not been linked to describe time-related factors associated with nulliparous transfer to hospital. OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of referral for nulliparae and assess maternal and labor characteristics associated with intrapartum transfer. METHODS: Perinatal data from 2010 to 2015 were linked (n = 26,115). Women were reviewed with respect to international eligibility criteria for community birth; 1997 women were excluded (7.6%). Descriptive statistics were reported; unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) tested the predictive effect of demographic and labor factors on rates of intrapartum transfer. RESULTS: One in three nulliparous women (30.6%) were transferred to hospital. Compared with community births, transferred women were significantly more likely to experience longer time intervals during labor: from rupture of membranes (ROM) until birth lasting 5 to 18 h (OR 6.05, CI 5.53-6.61) and 19 to 24 h (OR 10.83, CI 9.45-12.41) compared to one to 4 h; and from onset of labor until birth 11 to 24 h (OR 6.72, CI 6.24-7.23) and 25 to 29 h (OR 26.62, CI 22.77-31.11) compared to one to 10 h. When entering all factors into the model, we found the strongest predictors of transfer to be fetal distress, longer time intervals between ROM until birth and onset of labor until birth. CONCLUSIONS: Nulliparous transfer rates were similar to rates in other high-income countries; 94% of referrals were non-urgent. Time was found to be an independent risk factor for the transfer of nulliparae planning community birth.

Experiences of Midwives Attending Home Births in Massachusetts During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Public interest in home birth in the United States increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Midwives attend the vast majority of home births and are experts in providing home birth care. However, limited data are available about the experiences of midwives attending home births during the pandemic in the United States. METHODS: We developed a cross-sectional survey comprising 34 questions, which included 5 open-ended questions. The survey was distributed online in June 2021 to midwives attending home birth in Massachusetts. We calculated descriptive statistics for the quantitative survey responses and identified qualitative free-text responses illustrating the results. RESULTS: Eighteen midwives and 2 midwife apprentices responded to the survey, approximately 50% of Massachusetts' total number of midwives known to attend homebirths. The majority of the 20 respondents reported an increase in public interest in home birth (n = 17) and higher caseloads (n = 14) since the start of the pandemic. Respondents reported an increase in the number of clients transferring to their practices at a later gestational age (n = 13) and who identified as people of color (n = 8). They described both better and worse transfer of care to hospital experiences. Work-life balance and unpredictable income were the top 2 reported obstacles to home birth practice. DISCUSSION: The results of our study indicate that midwives providing home birth care in Massachusetts witnessed a surge in demand for their services during the pandemic. Implementing policies and practices that provide support for certified professional midwives could strengthen the home birth workforce, enhance access to home birth options, and optimize transfers to hospital settings when necessary.

Perceptions and Attitudes Toward Genetic Counselors and Genetic Testing Among Certified Professional Midwives in Vermont: A Modified Grounded Theory Study.

Increasingly, pregnant people in the United States are choosing to give at birth at home, and certified professional midwives (CPMs) often attend these births. Care by midwives, including home birth midwives, has the potential to decrease unnecessary medical interventions and their associated health care costs, as well as to improve maternal satisfaction with care. However, lack of integration into the health care system affects the ability of CPMs to access standard medications and testing for their clients, including prenatal screening. Genetics and genomics are now a routine part of prenatal screening, and genetic testing can contribute to identifying candidates for planned home birth. However, research on genetics and midwifery care has not, to date, included the subset of midwives who attend the majority of planned home births, CPMs. The purpose of this study was to examine CPMs' access to, and perspectives on, one aspect of prenatal care, genetic counselors and genetic counseling services. Using semi-structured interviews and a modified grounded theory approach to narrative analysis, we identified three key themes: (1) systems-level issues with accessing information about genetic counseling and genetic testing; (2) practice-level patterns in information delivery and self-awareness about knowledge limitations; and (3) client-level concerns about the value of genetic testing relative to difficulties with access and stress caused by the information. The results of this study can be used to develop decision aids that include information about genetic testing and genetic counseling access for pregnant people intending home births in the United States.

Características de la atención prenatal y su asociación con el lugar y tipo de parto de mujeres peruanas / Characteristics of prenatal care and its association with the place and type of delivery of peruvian women

Resumen OBJETIVO: Establecer la asociación entre las características de la atención prenatal y el lugar y tipo de finalización del embarazo de mujeres peruanas. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, analítico y transversal, de enfoque cuantitativo, efectuado a partir del análisis de una base secundaria de datos de la Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar (ENDES) del año 2021 en la que participaron mujeres peruanas que cumplieron los criterios de selección. La asociación se evaluó mediante regresión de Poisson. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron los datos de 17,371 mujeres peruanas. El 5.55% de los partos fueron domiciliarios y el 33.75% culminaron por cesárea. La probabilidad de parto domiciliario se incrementó ante la carencia de control prenatal (p < 0.001; razón de prevalencia ajustada (RPa): 5.23), haber recibido información de sus derechos (p < 0.001; RPa:1.27) y debido a la atención encargada a enfermeras (p < 0.001; RPa:5.06) o promotores de salud (p < 0.001; RPa:1.39). La finalización del embarazo mediante cesárea fue mayor cuando la primera atención prenatal se inició durante el primer trimestre (p < 0.001; RPa:1.22), con examen de sangre (p = 0.004; RPa:1.19), escucha de latidos fetales (p = 0.001; RPa:1.48), pruebas para sífilis (p < 0.001; RPa:1.09) y VIH (p < 0.001; RPa:1.45), prescripción de hierro (p < 0.001; RPa:1.18), información para su alimentación (p < 0.001; RPa:1.21), control por parte del médico (p < 0.001; RPa:1.37) o técnico en enfermería (p < 0.001; RPa:1.26). CONCLUSIÓN: Se identificaron lascaracterísticas de la atención que determinaron el tipo y lugar de finalización del embarazo.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between the characteristics of prenatal care and the place and type of abortion in Peruvian women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational, analytical and cross-sectional study, with a quantitative approach, carried out from the analysis of a secondary database of the Demographic and Family Health Survey (ENDES) of the year 2021, in which Peruvian women who met the selection criteria participated. The association was assessed using Poisson regression. RESULTS: Data from 17,371 Peruvian women were analyzed. A total of 5.55% of deliveries were home births and 33.75% were caesarean sections. The odds of home delivery were increased by lack of prenatal care (p < 0.001; adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR): 5.23), having received information about their rights (p < 0.001; aPR: 1.27), and having received care from nurses (p < 0.001; aPR: 5.06) or community health workers (p < 0.001; aPR: 1.39). Termination of pregnancy by cesarean section was higher when the first prenatal care visit was initiated during the first trimester (p < 0.001; RPA: 1.22), with blood testing (p = 0.004; RPA: 1.19), fetal heart rate monitoring (p = 0.001; RPA: 1. 48), testing for syphilis (p < 0.001; RPa:1.09) and HIV (p < 0.001; RPa:1.45), prescription of iron (p < 0.001; RPa:1.18), information on nutrition (p < 0.001; RPa:1.21), monitoring by physician (p < 0.001; RPa:1.37) or nurse. CONCLUSION: Characteristics of care that determined the type and location of pregnancy termination were identified.

Exploring home births in Catalonia (Spain): A cross-sectional study of women's experiences and influencing factors.

AIM: The study explores the experiences of women with low-risk pregnancies and no complications who planned a home birth. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire. METHODS: The questionnaire included socio-demographic, obstetric and perinatal variables. Birth satisfaction was evaluated via the Spanish version of the childbirth experience questionnaire. The study group comprised home-birthing women in Catalonia, Spain. Data were collected from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. RESULTS: A total of 236 women responded. They reported generally positive experiences, with professional support and involvement being the most highly rated dimensions. Better childbirth experiences were associated with labour lasting less than 12 h, no perineal injuries, no intrapartum transfers to hospital, euthocic delivery and the presence of a midwife. CONCLUSIONS: Women's positive home birth experiences were linked to active participation and midwife support. Multiparous women felt safer. Medical interventions, especially transfers to hospitals, reduced satisfaction, highlighting the need for improved care during home births. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: Home births should be included among the birthplace options offered by public health services, given the extremely positive feedback reported by women who gave birth at home. IMPACT: Home birth is not an option offered under Catalonia's public health system only as a private service. The experience of home-birthing women is unknown. This study shows a very positive birth experience due to greater participation and midwife support. The results help stakeholders assess home birth's public health inclusion and understand valued factors, supporting home-birthing women. REPORTING METHOD: The study followed the STROBE checklist guidelines for cross-sectional studies. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Women who planned a home birth participated in the pilot test to validate the instrument, and their contributions were collected by the lead researcher. The questionnaire gathered the participants' email addresses, and a commitment was made to disseminate the study's results through this means.

"I had no choice": A mixed-methods study on access to care for vaginal breech birth.

INTRODUCTION: Although current recommendations support vaginal breech birth as a reasonable option, access to breech birth in US hospitals is limited. This study explored the experiences of decision-making and perceptions of access to care in people who transferred out of the hospital system to pursue home breech birth. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study of people with a singleton, term breech fetus who transferred out of the US hospital system to pursue home breech birth. Twenty-five people completed an online demographic and psychosocial survey, and 23 (92%) participated in semi-structured interviews. We used an interpretive description approach informed by situational analysis to analyze qualitative data about participants' experiences and perceived access to care. RESULTS: Of 25 individuals who left the hospital system to pursue a home breech birth, most felt denied informed choice (64%) and threatened or coerced into cesarean (68%). The majority reported low or very low autonomy in decision-making (n = 20, 80%) and high decisional satisfaction using validated measures. Many participants felt safer in a hospital setting but were not able to access care for planned vaginal breech hospital birth, despite extensive efforts. Participants felt "backed into a corner" and "forced into homebirth," perceiving a lack of access to safe and respectful care in the hospital system. CONCLUSION: Some service users believe that home birth is their only option when they cannot access hospital-based care for vaginal breech birth. Current barriers to care for breech birth limit birthing people's autonomy and may be placing them and their infants at increased risk.

Home births as a "right" of female patients in the context of medicine, legislation and court jurisprudence.

Currently, in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, more and more women prefer a planned home birth to a hospital birth, despite the fact that the hospital provides a safe environment for laboring women, thanks to the possibility to intervene at any time in case of complications. These women consider childbirth a natural process, while obstetric care is often considered unnecessary. According to the World Health Organization, birth can only be defined as physiological after birth. Even though women can give birth without medical assistance, it is not possible to identify in advance the mothers and newborns who will need some kind of intervention during childbirth. Although a planned home birth is associated with fewer maternal interventions and the probability of a spontaneous vaginal birth, compared to a planned hospital birth, the risk of neonatal death is two- to three-times higher.