Comparison of the effect of use of preoperative mexiletine tablets and control on reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Objective: Postoperative pain is a major concern for patients and healthcare providers following abdominal surgery. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of mexiletine in reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Methods: In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, 34 patients were divided into two groups. One group received 600 mg of mexiletine tablets, while the other group received vitamin C tablets (control) two hours before surgery. Postoperative pain levels were assessed at 6, 12, and 24 h by using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Additionally, the amount of narcotics received within the first 24 h after surgery was recorded. Results: The results showed that the average postoperative pain score in patients who received mexiletine was significantly lower than in those who received vitamin C tablets (P<0.001). Furthermore, the average amount of narcotics received after surgery was significantly lower in the mexiletine group compared to the control group (P=0.03). Pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 h after surgery were also significantly lower in the mexiletine group (P<0.001). Conclusion: Mexiletine was effective in reducing postoperative pain and the need for narcotics in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. This study highlights the potential of mexiletine as a valuable preoperative intervention for postoperative pain management.

Recommendations of an expert group for the cardiac assessment of non-dystrophic myotonia adult patients treated with mexiletine.

Mexiletine (NaMuscla™) is indicated for the symptomatic treatment of myotonia in adults with non-dystrophic myotonia. A cardiac assessment is required as mexiletine may have a pro-arrhythmic effect. Long-term safety data supporting the use of mexiletine in patients with non-dystrophic myotonia combined with the extensive clinical experience of an expert group resulted in creation of an algorithm for cardiac monitoring of patients treated with mexiletine. To define the treatment algorithm, several expert workshops including three neurologists, five cardiologists from different French neuromuscular reference centers and one pharmacologist from Italy were set up. These workshops aimed to define the screening and surveillance tools required to ensure the safe use of mexiletine in patients. The recommendations are based on the summary of product characteristics (SmPC), a review of the literature on the safety of mexiletine-treated patients with non-dystrophic myotonia, and the expertise of the authors. The expert group concluded that the cardiac safety profile of mexiletine in these patients appears to be similar to that in the general population. Therefore, patients with non-dystrophic myotonia treated with mexiletine should be monitored as per any patient with cardiac problems who are prescribed a class 1b anti-arrhythmic.

Preclinical study of the antimyotonic efficacy of safinamide in the myotonic mouse model.

Mexiletine is the first choice drug in the treatment of non-dystrophic myotonias. However, 30% of patients experience little benefit from mexiletine due to poor tolerability, contraindications and limited efficacy likely based on pharmacogenetic profile. Safinamide inhibits neuronal voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels and shows anticonvulsant activity, in addition to a reversible monoamine oxidase-B inhibition. We evaluated the preclinical effects of safinamide in an animal model of Myotonia Congenita, the ADR (arrested development of righting response) mouse. In vitro studies were performed using the two intracellular microelectrodes technique in current clamp mode. We analyzed sarcolemma excitability in skeletal muscle fibers isolated from male and female ADR (adr/adr) and from Wild-Type (wt/wt) mice, before and after the application of safinamide and the reference compound mexiletine. In ADR mice, the maximum number of action potentials (N-spikes) elicited by a fixed current is higher with respect to that of WT mice. Myotonic muscles show an involuntary firing of action potential called after-discharges. A more potent activity of safinamide compared to mexiletine has been demonstrated in reducing N-spikes and the after-discharges in myotonic muscle fibers. The time of righting reflex (TRR) before and after administration of safinamide and mexiletine was evaluated in vivo in ADR mice. Safinamide was able to reduce the TRR in ADR mice to a greater extent than mexiletine. In conclusion, safinamide counteracted the abnormal muscle hyperexcitability in myotonic mice both in vitro and in vivo suggesting it as an effective drug to be indicated in Myotonia Congenita.

Severe caffeine poisoning with mexiletine successfully treated by extracorporeal methods: A case report.

A 20-year-old woman was brought to the hospital in an ambulance after ingesting 18 g of caffeine and 3500 mg of mexiletine 80 min earlier. On arrival at the emergency room, her vital signs were as follows: blood pressure, 65/37 mmHg; heart rate, 140 beats/min; and Glasgow Coma Scale, E4V4M6. Laboratory analyses revealed hypokalemia and lactic acidosis. The patient was treated with mechanical ventilation after intratracheal intubation, intravenous noradrenaline infusion, gastric lavage, and activated charcoal administration. Shortly afterwards, she developed pulseless ventricular tachycardia, and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) was initiated. As the circulatory collapse continued, hemodialysis (HD) was performed with continuous intravenous infusion of noradrenaline. After the completion of HD, the noradrenaline dose was reduced. On hospital day 2, HD was performed on the second day of hospitalization. On hospital days 3 and 4, the patient was weaned off VA-ECMO and ventilator. The blood concentrations of caffeine and mexiletine at presentation were 387 µg/mL and 1.1 µg/mL respectively. During the first HD, blood concentrations of both drugs were markedly reduced. It has been reported that mexiletine may reduce the clearance of caffeine probably via inhibition of N-demethylation. In this case, the endogenous clearance of caffeine, calculated from blood concentrations, was considerably lower than estimated. If HD had not been performed, it may have taken longer to wean off the VA-ECMO because of reduced caffeine clearance in the presence of mexiletine. Notably, caffeine poisoning is more severe and prolonged when mexiletine is administered.

Development, validation and long-term evaluation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous quantification of amiodarone, desethylamiodarone and mexiletine in human plasma and serum.

Amiodarone and mexiletine are used for ventricular arrhythmias, for which a combination therapy of both anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) is not uncommon. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can be beneficial for clinical guidance of therapy, especially to correctly identify adverse events. Desethylamiodarone, the active metabolite of amiodarone, accumulates over time and is associated with serious adverse events. Therefore, simultaneous TDM for amiodarone, desethylamiodarone and mexiletine is advantageous in clinical practice. The presented LC-MS/MS method was validated for selectivity, matrix effect, linearity, accuracy, precision, carry-over and stability. The method was continuously evaluated during eight months of clinical use. The method was shown to be linear within the measured range of 0.1 to 10 mg/L for each component. The matrix effect was considered negligible. No interfering responses were found for amiodarone, desethylamiodarone and the isotopic-labeled internal standards. A constant and reproducible within-run contribution of 45.3 %, originating from the system, was identified for mexiletine. The systemic contribution to the peak area of the lowest quantifiable concentration of mexiletine affected the selectivity and carry-over effect measurements. Multiple measurements showed that regression adjusted concentrations were accurate and reproducible, indicating calibration correction was applicable. Sample stability was found to be within limits for all storage conditions and freeze-thaw cycles. Furthermore, long-term method evaluation with external controls resulted in stable measurements with a percentage coefficient of variance between 1.3 % and 6.3 %. The presented practical and reliable method is applicable for clinical TDM and will allow clinical practitioners to guide drug therapy of amiodarone and mexiletine.

Clinical presentation and genetic characterization of early-onset atrial fibrillation in patients affected by long QT syndrome: A single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION: Early-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) has already been observed in approximately 2% of patients with genetically proven long QT syndrome (LQTS). This frequency is higher than population-based estimates of early-onset AF. However, the concomitant expression of AF in LQTS is likely underestimated. The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical presentation, genetic background, and outcomes of a cohort of patients with LQTS and early-onset AF referred to a single tertiary center. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients diagnosed with congenital LQTS were included in the study based on the documentation of early-onset (age ≤50 years) clinical or subclinical AF episodes in all available medical records, including standard electrocardiograms, wearable monitor or cardiac implantable electronic devices. RESULTS: Seventeen patients experienced clinical AF during the follow-up period. Subclinical AF was detected in 10 patients through insertable or wearable cardiac monitors. In our series, the mean heart rate during AF episodes was found to be relatively low despite the patients' young age and the low or minimal effective doses of beta-blockers used for QTc interval control. All patients exhibiting LQTS and early-onset AF were genotype positive, carrying mutations in the KCNQ1 (66%), KCNH2, KCNE1, and SCN5A genes. Notably, most of these patients carried the same p.(R231C) mutation in the KCNQ1 gene (59%) and were from the same families, suggesting concurrent expression of familial AF and LQTS. CONCLUSION: LQTS patients are prone to developing clinical and subclinical AF, even at a younger age. The occurrence of early-onset AF in the LQTS population could be more frequent than previously assumed. AF should be considered as a potential dysrhythmia related to LQTS. Our study emphasizes the importance of carefully researching clinical and/or subclinical episodes of AF through strict heart rhythm monitoring in the LQTS population.

Therapeutic Efficacy of Mexiletine for Long QT Syndrome Type 2: Evidence From Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes, Transgenic Rabbits, and Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite major advances in the clinical management of long QT syndrome, some patients are not fully protected by beta-blocker therapy. Mexiletine is a well-known sodium channel blocker, with proven efficacy in patients with sodium channel-mediated long QT syndrome type 3. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of mexiletine in long QT syndrome type 2 (LQT2) using cardiomyocytes derived from patient-specific human induced pluripotent stem cells, a transgenic LQT2 rabbit model, and patients with LQT2. METHODS: Heart rate-corrected field potential duration, a surrogate for QTc, was measured in human induced pluripotent stem cells from 2 patients with LQT2 (KCNH2-p.A561V, KCNH2-p.R366X) before and after mexiletine using a multiwell multi-electrode array system. Action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90) was evaluated in cardiomyocytes isolated from transgenic LQT2 rabbits (KCNH2-p.G628S) at baseline and after mexiletine application. Mexiletine was given to 96 patients with LQT2. Patients were defined as responders in the presence of a QTc shortening ≥40 ms. Antiarrhythmic efficacy of mexiletine was evaluated by a Poisson regression model. RESULTS: After acute treatment with mexiletine, human induced pluripotent stem cells from both patients with LQT2 showed a significant shortening of heart rate-corrected field potential duration compared with dimethyl sulfoxide control. In cardiomyocytes isolated from LQT2 rabbits, acute mexiletine significantly shortened APD90 by 113 ms, indicating a strong mexiletine-mediated shortening across different LQT2 model systems. Mexiletine was given to 96 patients with LQT2 either chronically (n=60) or after the acute oral drug test (n=36): 65% of the patients taking mexiletine only chronically and 75% of the patients who performed the acute oral test were responders. There was a significant correlation between basal QTc and ∆QTc during the test (r= -0.8; P<0.001). The oral drug test correctly predicted long-term effect in 93% of the patients. Mexiletine reduced the mean yearly event rate from 0.10 (95% CI, 0.07-0.14) to 0.04 (95% CI, 0.02-0.08), with an incidence rate ratio of 0.40 (95% CI, 0.16-0.84), reflecting a 60% reduction in the event rate (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Mexiletine significantly shortens cardiac repolarization in LQT2 human induced pluripotent stem cells, in the LQT2 rabbit model, and in the majority of patients with LQT2. Furthermore, mexiletine showed antiarrhythmic efficacy. Mexiletine should therefore be considered a valid therapeutic option to be added to conventional therapies in higher-risk patients with LQT2.

Self-reported outcomes and quality of life of patients with non-dystrophic myotonia: The French IMPACT 2022 survey.

Non-dystrophic myotonias (NDM) are disabling genetic diseases that impact quality of life. To reduce the impact of NDM, patients develop coping strategies such as lifestyle adaptation and avoiding key triggers. To understand how myotonia affects patients' lives, the IMPACT survey, an online questionnaire on patient-reported outcomes, was developed based on international IMPACT questionnaire. The French IMPACT 2022 survey was completed by 47 NDM French patients. Besides muscle stiffness (98%), patients reported muscle pain (83%), falls (70%) and anxiety (77%). These issues negatively impacted abilities to work/study (49%), daily life at home (49%) and overall mobility outside (49%). Most patients (96%) reported ongoing pharmacological treatment (mexiletine, 91%) associated with improvement in muscle stiffness (100%) and reduction in falls (94%), muscle pain (87%) and anxiety (80%). Patients were moderately satisfied (19.1%), satisfied (42.6%) and very satisfied (29.8%) with the current management; 32% rated their quality of life positively (≥ 8 on 10-point scale). In conclusion, this French survey confirms the impact of myotonia on daily life and quality of life. The improvement in patient-reported outcomes in treated participants highlights the importance of managing myotonia with effective treatments. More work should be initiated to assess the importance of NDM symptom management and patients' adherence and compliance to treatment.

Functional effects of drugs and toxins interacting with NaV1.4.

NaV1.4 is a voltage-gated sodium channel subtype that is predominantly expressed in skeletal muscle cells. It is essential for producing action potentials and stimulating muscle contraction, and mutations in NaV1.4 can cause various muscle disorders. The discovery of the cryo-EM structure of NaV1.4 in complex with ß1 has opened new possibilities for designing drugs and toxins that target NaV1.4. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of channelopathies, the binding sites and functions of chemicals including medicine and toxins that interact with NaV1.4. These substances could be considered novel candidate compounds or tools to develop more potent and selective drugs targeting NaV1.4. Therefore, studying NaV1.4 pharmacology is both theoretically and practically meaningful.

Expert opinion on mexiletine treatment in adult patients with myotonic dystrophy.

In France, mexiletine - a class I antiarrhythmic drug - can be prescribed for the symptomatic treatment of myotonia of the skeletal muscles in adult patients with myotonic dystrophy under a compassionate use programme. Mexiletine is used according to its summary of product characteristics, which describes its use for myotonia treatment in adult patients with non-dystrophic myotonia, a different neuromuscular condition without cardiac involvement. A cardiac assessment is required prior to initiation and throughout treatment due to potential proarrhythmic effects. The presence of conduction system disease, the most common cardiac manifestation of myotonic dystrophy, mandates repeated cardiac evaluations in patients with this condition, and becomes even more important when they are given mexiletine. A group of experts, including three neurologists and five cardiologists from French neuromuscular reference centres, were involved in a task force to develop a treatment algorithm to guide mexiletine use in myotonic dystrophy. The recommendations are based on data from a literature review of the safety of mexiletine-treated patients with myotonic dystrophy, the compassionate use protocol for mexiletine and the personal clinical experience of the experts. The main conclusion of the expert group is that, although existing safety data in mexiletine-treated patients with myotonic dystrophy are reassuring, cardiac assessments should be reinforced in such patients compared with mexiletine-treated patients with non-dystrophic myotonia. This expert opinion to guide mexiletine treatment in patients with myotonic dystrophy should help to reduce the risk of severe adverse events and facilitate interactions between specialists involved in the routine care of patients with myotonic dystrophy.

Autosomal Recessive Myotonia Congenita in an Adolescent Boy With Novel Mutation: A Case Report With Discussion on Management.

Congenital myotonia represents a rare group of genetically inherited conditions. It can be either autosomal dominant (Thomsen) or autosomal recessive (Becker). It is characterized by muscular hypertrophy, proximal weakness, and myotonia, or impaired relaxation after contraction. These are due to mutations in the CLC1 gene. A 14-year-old male child presented with complaints of gradually progressive weakness for five years. Weakness was more pronounced in the proximal muscle groups. The weakness worsened after rest and improved with activity. This led to absenteeism and affected his school performance. Clinical examination showed generalized muscular hypertrophy with pronounced hypertrophy of the calf muscles. A neurological examination showed significant myotonia and impaired relaxation after making a fist. The diagnosis of myotonia was confirmed by electromyography, which produced a dive-bomber sound on insertion. Next-generation sequencing revealed a homozygous eight-base pair insertion in exon 19 of the CLCN1 gene. This mutation has not been reported in the existing literature for myotonia congenita. The child was started on mexiletine and improved significantly. Presently, the patient is on regular medications and doing well on follow-up. Though rare, congenital myotonia is an important cause of neuromuscular weakness. It can be easily diagnosed with a thorough clinical examination and routine testing for myotonia in all children with weakness. The treatment is relatively simple and can give the patient significant relief. Myotonia can be easily diagnosed clinically, and pharmacotherapy and proper monitoring can remarkably improve patients' quality of life.

Effectiveness and safety of mexiletine versus placebo in patients with myotonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The rare nature of dystrophic and non-dystrophic myotonia has limited the available evidence on the efficacy of mexiletine as a potential treatment. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of mexiletine for both dystrophic and non-dystrophic myotonic patients. METHODS: The search was conducted on various electronic databases up to March 2023, for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing mexiletine versus placebo in myotonic patients. A risk of bias assessment was carried out, and relevant data was extracted manually into an online sheet. RevMan software (version 5.4) was employed for analysis. RESULTS: A total of five studies, comprising 186 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Our findings showed that mexiletine was significantly more effective than placebo in improving stiffness score (SMD = - 1.19, 95% CI [- 1.53, - 0.85]), as well as in reducing hand grip myotonia (MD = - 1.36 s, 95% CI [- 1.83, - 0.89]). Mexiletine also significantly improved SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Score in patients with non-dystrophic myotonia only. Regarding safety, mexiletine did not significantly alter ECG parameters but was associated with greater gastrointestinal symptoms (GIT) compared to placebo (RR 3.7, 95% CI [1.79, 7.64]). Other adverse events showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: The results support that mexiletine is effective and safe in myotonic patients; however, it is associated with a higher risk of GIT symptoms. Due to the scarcity of published RCTs and the prevalence of GIT symptoms, we recommend further well-designed RCTs testing various drug combinations to reduce GIT symptoms.

Relevance of mexiletine in the era of evolving antiarrhythmic therapy of ventricular arrhythmias.

Despite impressive developments in the field of ventricular arrhythmias, there is still a relevant number of patients with ventricular arrhythmias who require antiarrhythmic drug therapy and may, e.g., in otherwise drug and/or ablation refractory situations, benefit from agents known for decades, such as mexiletine. Through its capability of blocking fast sodium channels in cardiomyocytes, it has played a minor to moderate antiarrhythmic role throughout the recent decades. Nevertheless, certain patients with structural heart disease suffering from drug-refractory, i.e., mainly amiodarone refractory ventricular arrhythmias, as well as those with selected forms of congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) may nowadays still benefit from mexiletine. Here, we outline mexiletine's cellular and clinical electrophysiological properties. In addition, the application of mexiletine may be accompanied by various potential side effects, e.g., nausea and tremor, and is limited by several drug-drug interactions. Thus, we shed light on the current therapeutic role of mexiletine for therapy of ventricular arrhythmias and discuss clinically relevant aspects of its indications based on current evidence.

Expert Insights from a Delphi-driven Neurologists' Panel: Real-world Mexiletine use in Patients with Myotonic Disorders in Italy.

Background: Myotonic disorders, such as non-dystrophic myotonias (NDMs) and myotonic dystrophies (DMs) are characterized by a delay in muscle relaxation after a contraction stimulus. There is general consensus that protocols to treat myotonia need to be implemented. Objective: Mexiletine is the only pharmacological agent approved for the symptomatic treatment of myotonia in adult patients with NDM and is considered to be the first-line treatment for DMs; however, its production in Italy was halted in 2022 making its availability to patients problematic. Methods: A panel of 8 Italian neurologists took part in a two-round Delphi panel between June and October 2022, analyzing the current use of mexiletine in Italian clinical practice. Results: The panelists assist 1126 patients (69% DM type1, 18% NDM and 13% DM type2). Adult NDM patients receive, on average, 400-600 mg of mexiletine hydrochloride (HCl) while adult DM patients receive 100-600 mg, per day in the long-term. The severity of symptoms is considered the main reason to start mexiletine treatment for both NDM and DM patients. Mexiletine is reckoned to have a clinical impact for both NDM and DM patients, but currently drug access is problematic. Conclusions: Mexiletine treatment is recognized to have a role in the reduction of the symptomatic burden for NDM and DM patients. Patient management could be improved by facilitating access to therapy and developing new drug formulations.

Effects of intramolecular hydrogen bonding on nuclear magnetic resonance, electron paramagnetic resonance and molecular docking studies: Mexiletine molecule.

CONTEXT: In this study, the molecular structure of the mexiletine molecule was investigated. Since the Mexiletine molecule is a drug active ingredient, its molecular structure and spectroscopic properties are important. The effects of intramolecular hydrogen bonding on Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Parameters (NMR), Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) parameters and molecular docking studies were examined in the mexiletine molecule. The effects of intramolecular hydrogen bonding on EPR parameters and molecular docking studies are the most important steps for this study. METHOD: Conformational space scanning required for molecular structure calculations was carried out with the Molecular Mechanic Force Field method. DFT method with 6-311 + + G(d,p) basis set level was used to obtain the most stable structure among the conformations. NMR parameters (1H and 13C chemical shift values) were also performed using the same basis set as the DFT method. The radicals created to calculate the Electron Paramagnetic Resonance parameters were modeled using the DFT/B3LYP/6-311 + + G(d,p) method basis set level. Molecular Docking studies were carried out with the Autodock vina program.

Loss of sodium current caused by a Brugada syndrome-associated variant is determined by patient-specific genetic background.

BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is an inherited cardiac arrhythmogenic disease that predisposes patients to sudden cardiac death. It is associated with mutations in SCN5A, which encodes the cardiac sodium channel alpha subunit (NaV1.5). BrS-related mutations have incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity within families. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the role of patient-specific genetic background on the cellular and clinical phenotype among carriers of NaV1.5_p.V1525M. METHODS: We studied sodium currents from patient-specific human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) and heterologously transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) tsA201 cells using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. We determined gene and protein expression by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, RNA sequencing, and western blot and performed a genetic panel for arrhythmogenic diseases. RESULTS: Our results showed a large reduction in INa density in hiPSC-CM derived from 2 V1525M single nucleotide variant (SNV) carriers compared with hiPSC-CM derived from a noncarrier, suggesting a dominant-negative effect of the NaV1.5_p.V1525M channel. INa was not affected in hiPSC-CMs derived from a V1525M SNV carrier who also carries the NaV1.5_p.H558R polymorphism. Heterozygous expression of V1525M in HEK-293T cells produced a loss of INa function, not observed when this variant was expressed together with H558R. In addition, the antiarrhythmic drug mexiletine rescued INa function in hiPSC-CM. SCN5A expression was increased in the V1525M carrier who also expresses NaV1.5_p.H558R. CONCLUSION: Our results in patient-specific hiPSC-CM point to a dominant-negative effect of NaV1.5_p.V1525M, which can be reverted by the presence of NaV1.5_p.H558R. Overall, our data points to a role of patient-specific genetic background as a determinant for incomplete penetrance in BrS.

Use of mexiletine in therapy-refractory recurrent ventricular tachycardia storm.

Electrical storm due to recurrent ventricular tachycardias (VTs) is a life-threatening arrhythmic emergency. The authors present a case report of a 69-year-old male patient with VT storm of non-ischemic etiology. Despite optimal medical treatment escalated by amiodarone antiarrhythmic drug therapy, the patient experienced multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. An electrophysiological study revealed an epicardial substrate; however, considering the patient's extreme obesity and active anticoagulant effect, catheter ablation was deemed to be unfeasible. Subsequently, mexiletine was added to the patient's drug regimen, resulting in successful control of arrhythmias during the following 6 months. Although the most recent European guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias mention mexiletine only for the treatment of LQT3 patients, its use for treatment-refractory VT storm seems to also be an important indication area.

Mexiletine: Antiarrhythmic mechanisms, emerging clinical applications and mortality.

Mexiletine, a class Ib antiarrhythmic drug, exhibits its major antiarrhythmic effect via inhibition of the fast and late Na+ currents in myocardial tissues that are dependent on the opening of Na+ channels for their excitation. Through a comprehensive examination of mexiletine's therapeutic benefits and potential risks, we aim to provide valuable insights that reinforce its role as a vital therapeutic option for patients with ventricular arrhythmias, long QT syndrome, and other heart rhythm disorders. This review will highlight the current understandings of the antiarrhythmic effects and rationales for recent off-label use and address the mortality and proarrhythmic effects of mexiletine utilizing published basic and clinical studies over the past five decades.

Unravelling Novel SCN5A Mutations Linked to Brugada Syndrome: Functional, Structural, and Genetic Insights.

Brugada Syndrome (BrS) is a rare inherited cardiac arrhythmia causing potentially fatal ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, mainly occurring during rest or sleep in young individuals without heart structural issues. It increases the risk of sudden cardiac death, and its characteristic feature is an abnormal ST segment elevation on the ECG. While BrS has diverse genetic origins, a subset of cases can be conducted to mutations in the SCN5A gene, which encodes for the Nav1.5 sodium channel. Our study focused on three novel SCN5A mutations (p.A344S, p.N347K, and p.D349N) found in unrelated BrS families. Using patch clamp experiments, we found that these mutations disrupted sodium currents: p.A344S reduced current density, while p.N347K and p.D349N completely abolished it, leading to altered voltage dependence and inactivation kinetics when co-expressed with normal channels. We also explored the effects of mexiletine treatment, which can modulate ion channel function. Interestingly, the p.N347K and p.D349N mutations responded well to the treatment, rescuing the current density, while p.A344S showed a limited response. Structural analysis revealed these mutations were positioned in key regions of the channel, impacting its stability and function. This research deepens our understanding of BrS by uncovering the complex relationship between genetic mutations, ion channel behavior, and potential therapeutic interventions.