Is postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy necessary for patients with esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy? An analysis based on the SEER database.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). METHODS: The data of EC patients who received adjuvant therapy after NCRT between 2004 to 2019 was retrieved from the SEER database. The patients were split into the adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (RT±CT) and the adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) groups. The process of propensity score matching (PSM) was employed. RESULTS: Following PSM, 157 patients in total were recruited in each treatment group. There were no significant variations in either overall survival (OS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the RT±CT and CT groups (median OS: 28 months versus. 51 months, p=0.063; median CSS: 31 months versus. 52 months, p=0.16). Within the CT group, patients with ypI/II or cI/II tumor stage, positive lymph node ratio (LNR) ≤0.1, and tumor size ≥50 mm (p<0.05) had higher OS compared to the RT±CT groups. Among patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging group, the OS and CSS were significantly greater for those underwent RT±CT as opposed to the CT group (5-year OS:56.6% versus 19.4%, p=0.042; 5-year CSS:67.9% versus. 19.4%, p=0.023). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified the tumor histology grade as an independent prognostic factor of OS and CSS. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy-based adjuvant therapy does not significantly improve the prognosis of EC patients after NCRT, although it may provide a survival benefit for patients with cT3-4 tumors in N-stage downstaging.

Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains inconclusive, and the optimal regimen is still under investigation. METHODS: Prospective randomized clinical trials were systematically searched in electronic databases from inception to Oct 2023. A graphical reconstructive algorithm was employed to extract time-to-event outcomes from Kaplan-Meier curves presented in the original studies. Using reconstructed individual patient data, summary overall survival (OS) and disease progression-free survival (DFS) for nCRT versus nCT, primarily doublet chemotherapy were recalculated. Hazard Ratios (HRs) of OS and DFS reported were also pooled by the fixed-effects model. RESULTS: A total of 6 randomized clinical trials comprising 1162 patients were included in our analysis. In the individual patient data (IPD) pooled analysis, a significant OS benefit was found for nCRT in ESCC (HR=0.81, 95 %CI:0.67-0.98, p=0.029), compared with the treatment of nCT. The median overall survival time were 53 months (95 %CI:41.9-67.7 m) and 66 months(95 %CI:57.2-NA) respectively in the nCT and nCRT groups. Additionally, a significant improvement in PFS for nCRT compared to nCT in the IPD pooled analysis (HR=0.79,95 %CI:0.64-0.98; p=0.027). Consistent with above results, the pooled HRs of OS and DFS for nCRT versus nCT were 0.78 (95 % CI 0.65-0.92, p=0.004) and 0.79 (95 % CI: 0.65-0.97, p=0.02), respectively. Notably, no substantial heterogeneity across studies was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that nCRT offers better survival outcomes for ESCC, at least when compared to neoadjuvant doublet chemotherapy.This evidence continues to support the clinical practice of employing nCRT in locally advanced resectable ESCC.

Reduction in chemotherapy relative dose intensity decreases overall survival of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Many patients undergo dose reduction or early termination of chemotherapy to reduce chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity, which may increase their risk of survival. However, this strategy may result in underdosing patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LA-ESCC). This study aimed to analyze the relationship between the relative dose intensity (RDI) and survival outcomes in patients with LA-ESCC. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed patients with LA-ESCC (cT2N + M0, cT3-4NanyM0) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) with curative-intent esophagectomy. The patients received 2 courses of paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) combination radiotherapy prior to undergoing surgery. During NCRT, RDI was computed, defined as the received dose as a percentage of the standard dose, and the incidence of dose delays was estimated (≥ 7 days in any course cycle). The best RDI cutoff value (0.7) was obtained using ROC curve. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, the treatment effect was measured using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We included 132 patients in this study, divided into RDI < 0.7 and RDI ≥ 0.7 groups using cut-off value of 0.7. RDI grade was an independent prognostic factor for OS. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were well balanced between the groups. There was no evidence that patients with RDI < 0.7 experienced less toxicity or those with RDI ≥ 0.7 resulted in more toxicity. However, patients with RDI < 0.7 who were given reduced doses had a worse overall survival [HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.88, P = 0.015]. The risk of a lower RDI increased with a longer dose delay time (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The RDI below 0.7 for avoiding chemoradiotherapy toxicity administration led to a reduction in the dose intensity of treatment and decreased overall survival.

Relationships between postoperative recurrences and standardized uptake value on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative pancreatic resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to examine postoperative recurrence after curative pancreatic resection following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) in patients with resectable (R-) and borderline resectable (BR-) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), focusing on its relationship with the standardized uptake value (SUV) on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). METHOD: The postoperative initial recurrence patterns were examined in patients with R- and BR-PDAC who underwent NACRT followed by curative pancreatic resection. Data collected from three prospective clinical trials were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 29 months, 91 (60 %) of 151 patients experienced postoperative recurrence. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) for all patients was 18 months. The sites of first recurrence were lung-only in 24 (26 %) patients, liver-only in 23 (25 %), local-only in 11 (12 %), peritoneum-only in 10 (11 %), other single site in 5 (5 %), and multiple sites in 19 (21 %) patients. Multivariate analysis identified the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET at diagnoses ≥5.40 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.62; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.61; p = 0.045) and node-positive pathology (HR, 2.01; 95 % CI, 1.32-3.08; p = 0.001) as significant predictors of RFS. Furthermore, the SUVmax at initial diagnosis and after NACRT correlated with liver metastasis. CONCLUSION: R- and BR-PDACs with high SUV on FDG-PET at diagnosis are risk factors for postoperative recurrence. Among patients who undergo surgery after NACRT, those with a high SUVmax at diagnosis or post-NACRT require careful attention for postoperative liver recurrence.

Clinical effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy on complications and recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Objective: To compare the clinical effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) on complications and recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Method: This was a retrospective study. A total of 83 patients with AGC admitted to Chengde Central Hospital between Jan. 2019 and Jun. 2021 were selected and divided into the observation group(n=41) and the control group(n=42) using a random number table. Patients in the control group received XELOX chemotherapy, and those in the observation group received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent XELOX chemotherapy. Compared efficacy, pathological complete response rate (pCR), R0 resection rate, adverse reactions, and quality of life (QOL) before and after treatment between the two groups. Results: The efficacy, pCR, and R0 resection rate of the observation group were significantly increased compared with those of the control group. Comparison of complications showed the number of patients experiencing gastrointestinal (GI) reactions, increased BUN, increased GPT, alopecia, and pigmentation in the observation group was decreased compared with that in the control group, with no statistically significant differences(p>0.05), and the number of patients experiencing myelosuppression was statistically significant between the two groups(p<0.05). There were no significant differences in sub-scores of physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functions and the overall score of QOL between the two groups(p>0.05) before treatment. Conclusion: NCRT is safer and more effective in patients with AGC compared with NCT, and can significantly improve the QOL of patients. It can be widely used in clinical practice.

Effects of nutritional interventions on cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition commonly occurs in cancer patients, impacting their quality of life and survival duration. The objective of this meta-analysis and systematic review is to assess the effects of nutritional interventions on patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases to obtain randomized controlled trials of nutritional interventions in patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Outcomes assessed included toxicity reactions to neoadjuvant therapy, levels of inflammation-related markers, nutritional status, and relevant clinical outcomes. The relative risk (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect sizes. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies were included, involving 954 patients. Nutritional intervention significantly reduced the incidence of vomiting (RR = 0.37, 95%CI: 0.21-0.67, P = 0.001) and mucositis (RR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.67-1.00, P = 0.046) in patients with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. For the nutritional status of cancer patients, nutritional intervention significantly increased the proportion of well-nourished patients (RR = 12.74, 95%CI: 4.43-36.69, P < 0.001). In addition, nutritional intervention also reduced the length of hospital stay in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy patients after surgery (WMD = - 0.82, 95%CI: - 1.61- - 0.02, P = 0.043). However, there was no improvement in nausea (P = 0.534), diarrhea (P = 0.068), febrile neutropenia (P = 0.551), levels of albumin (P = 0.211), prealbumin (P = 0.063), C-reactive protein (P = 0.430), clinical remission (P = 0.148), or postoperative complications (P = 0.098). CONCLUSION: Nutritional intervention can reduce the toxicity of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (vomiting and mucositis), improve the nutritional status of patients, and shorten the length of postoperative hospital stay. Well-designed and high-quality studies are necessary to confirm the effect of nutritional interventions on cancer patients, with a specific focus on reaching nutritional goals and providing the right nutrients.

Comparison of the treatment outcomes of different neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by radical esophagectomy is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (LA-ESCC). However, various nCRT regimens have been used and their comparative efficacy and safety remain unclear. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed LA-ESCC who underwent nCRT followed by radical esophagectomy between January 2016 and February 2022 were enrolled in our study. Three different nCRT regimens were retrospectively compared: Conventional radiotherapy (RT) + cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (FP) (Conv-FP), hypofractionated RT + FP (Hypo-FP), and regimens from the CROSS trial (CROSS). The overall survival (OS), pathological complete response (pCR) rates, toxicities, and treatment compliance were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 600 patients, 225 received Conv-FP, 255 received Hypo-FP, and 120 received the CROSS regimen. OS at 1 year were 78.7%, 83.9%, and 88.1% in the Conv-FP, Hypo-FP, and CROSS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The pCR rates were 30.6%, 33.9%, and 35.0%, respectively (p = 0.653). The overall incidence of grade 3 toxicities was 10.2%. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities of grade ≥ 3 were observed in 8.4% and 11.4%, 0% and 7.6%, 5.5% and 0.8% in Conv-FP, Hypo-FP, and CROSS, respectively (p = 0.002 and 0.030). Weight loss > 5% was observed in 44.0%, 51.4%, and 32.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, clinical T-stage (p = 0.004), N-stage (p = 0.012), the use of FP chemotherapy regimen (p = 0.013), surgical resection (p < 0.001), hematologic toxicity (p = 0.001), and weight loss (p = 0.004) were significantly associated with poor OS. CONCLUSION: The choice of nCRT regimen did not significantly affect the pCR rates in patients with LA-ESCC. However, the CROSS regimen demonstrated better OS and lower toxicity, suggesting it may be the optimal treatment option among the groups. SYNOPSIS: This study compared three different neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) regimens for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (LA-ESCC): Conventional radiotherapy (RT) + cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (FP), hypofractionated RT + FP, and regimens from the CROSS trial. The overall survival (OS), pathological complete response (pCR) rates, toxicities, and treatment compliance were analyzed. Results showed that the choice of nCRT regimen did not significantly affect pCR rates, but the CROSS regimen showed better OS and lower toxicity, suggesting it may be the optimal treatment option. DATA AVAILABILITY: Data availability is limited due to institutional data protection law and confidentiality of patient data.

The addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy did not increase the risk of developing postoperative anastomotic leakage for ESCC: an analysis from a prospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: To compare the difference of postoperative anastomotic leakage (AL) rate between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) with pembrolizumab and NCRT group, and investigate the risk factors of developing AL for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The GF was contoured on the pretreatment planning computed tomography and dosimetric parameters were retrospectively calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent risk predictors for the entire cohort. A nomogram risk prediction model for postoperative AL was established. RESULTS: A total of 160 ESCC patients were included for analysis. Of them, 112 were treated with NCRT with pembrolizumab and 44 patients with NCRT. Seventeen (10.6%) patients experienced postoperative AL with a rate of 10.7% (12/112) in NCRT with pembrolizumab and 11.4% (5/44) in NCRT group. For the entire cohort, mean, D50, Dmax, V5, V10 and V20 GF dose were statistically higher in those with AL (all p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that tumor length (p = 0.012), volume of GF (p = 0.003) and mean dose of GF (p = 0.007) were independently predictors for postoperative AL. Using receiver operating characteristics analysis, the mean dose limit on the GF was defined as 14 Gy. CONCLUSION: Based on our prospective database, no significant difference of developing AL were observed between NCRT with pembrolizumab and NCRT group. We established an individualized nomograms based on mean GF dose combined with clinical indicators to predict AL in the early postoperative period.

Effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without PD-1 antibody sintilimab in pMMR locally advanced rectal cancer: A randomized clinical trial.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) was the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) proteins. In this randomized phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT04304209), 134 pMMR LARC patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to receive NACRT or NACRT and the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody sintilimab. As the primary endpoint, the total complete response (CR) rate is 26.9% (18/67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16.0%-37.8%) and 44.8% (30/67, 95% CI 32.6%-57.0%) in the control and experimental arm, respectively, with significant difference (p = 0.031 for chi-squared test). Response ratio is 1.667 (95% CI 1.035-2.683). Immunohistochemistry shows PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score is associated with the synergistic effect. The safety profile is similar between the arms. Adding the PD-1 antibody sintilimab to NACRT significantly increases the CR rate in pMMR LARC, with a manageable safety profile. PD-L1 positivity may help identify patients who might benefit most from the combination therapy.

Factors associated with pathological complete remission after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a real-world clinical setting.

Objective: This study aims to identify factors associated with achieving a pathological complete remission (pCR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Methods: We conducted a cohort analysis of 171 LARC patients who underwent curative resection post-nCRT at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University between January 2015 and December 2021. The data encompassed clinical and pathological information. Univariate and binary logistic regression multivariate analyses were employed to examine the factors influencing pCR achievement after nCRT. Kappa value tests were utilized to compare clinical staging after nCRT with postoperative pathological staging. Results: Postoperative histopathology revealed that of the 171 patients, 40 (23.4%) achieved TRG 0 grade (pCR group), while 131 (76.6%) did not achieve pCR, comprising 36 TRG1, 42 TRG2, and 53 TRG3 cases. Univariate analysis indicated that younger age (p=0.008), reduced tumor occupation of intestinal circumference (p =0.008), specific pathological types (p=0.011), and lower pre-nCRT CEA levels (p=0.003) correlated with pCR attainment. Multivariate analysis identified these factors as independent predictors of pCR: younger age (OR=0.946, p=0.004), smaller tumor occupation of intestinal circumference (OR=2.809, p=0.046), non-mucinous adenocarcinoma pathological type (OR=10.405, p=0.029), and lower pre-nCRT serum CEA levels (OR=2.463, p=0.031). Clinical re-staging post-nCRT compared to postoperative pathological staging showed inconsistent MRI T staging (Kappa=0.012, p=0.718, consistency rate: 35.1%) and marginally consistent MRI N staging (Kappa=0.205, p=0.001, consistency rate: 59.6%). Conclusion: LARC patients with younger age, presenting with smaller tumor circumferences in the intestinal lumen, lower pre-nCRT serum CEA levels, and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma are more likely to achieve pCR after nCRT. The study highlights the need for improved accuracy in clinical re-staging assessments after nCRT in LARC.

Mucinous histology is a negative predictor of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) is a potential poor prognosis subgroup of rectal cancer. However, the predictive value of MAC in NCRT treatment of LARC is controversial. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. All studies examining the effect of MAC on CRT response in LARC were included. Outcomes of MAC were compared with non-specific adenocarcinoma (AC) by using random-effects methods. Data were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The main outcomes were the rates of pathological complete response (pCR), tumor and nodal down-staging, positive resection margin rate, local recurrence, and overall mortality. RESULTS: Fifteen studies containing comparative data on outcomes in a total of 9,238 patients receiving NCRT for LARC were eligible for inclusion. MAC had a reduced rate of pCR (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.78) and tumor down-staging (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.22-0.44) following NCRT compared with AC. MAC did not significantly affect nodal down-staging (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.16-1.12) after NCRT. CONCLUSION: MAC of LARC was found to be a negative predictor of response to NCRT with lower rates of pCR and tumor down-staging for LARC. The nodal down-staging of MAC was relatively lower than that of AC, although the differences were not statistically significant.

Different impacts of adipose tissue dynamics on prognosis in patients with resectable locally advanced rectal cancer treated with and without neoadjuvant treatment.

Background: Body composition is recognized to be associated with clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study aimed to determine the prognostic role of regional adipose tissue distribution in patients with resectable LARC treated with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Methods: This retrospective study included 281 consecutive patients who underwent radical surgery for LARC with or without preoperative nCRT between 2013 and 2019. Patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT scans before nCRT and before surgery. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT), abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (aSAT), and gluteal subcutaneous adipose tissue (gSAT) were quantified on the CT images. The association of adipose tissue distribution with progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Results: A total of 102 nCRT-treated and 179 primarily resected patients were included. During a median follow-up period of 24 months, 74 (26.3%) patients experienced local recurrence or metastasis. Multivariable analysis showed that VAT was associated with PFS in all patients (hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.57; P = 0.021). This association was only maintained in primarily resected patients (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02-1.69; P = 0.037). For patients receiving preoperative nCRT, VAT was not significantly associated with PFS, while the dynamic change in gSAT (ΔgSAT) between nCRT and surgery was associated with PFS (HR 0.43, 95%CI 0.27-0.69, P = 0.001). Conclusion: Visceral obesity is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with resectable LARC treated by primary resection, while increased gluteal subcutaneous adiposity during preoperative nCRT may indicate favorable clinical outcomes.

Characterization and proteomic analysis of plasma-derived small extracellular vesicles in locally advanced rectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) stands as a pivotal therapeutic approach for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), yet the absence of a reliable biomarker to forecast its efficacy remains a challenge. Thus, this study aimed to assess whether the proteomic compositions of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) might offer predictive insights into nCRT response among patients with LARC, while also delving into the proteomic alterations within sEVs post nCRT. METHODS: Plasma samples were obtained from LARC patients both pre- and post-nCRT. Plasma-derived sEVs were isolated utilizing the TIO2-based method, followed by LC-MS/MS-based proteomic analysis. Subsequently, pathway enrichment analysis was performed to the Differentially Expressed Proteins (DEPs). Additionally, ROC curves were generated to evaluate the predictive potential of sEV proteins in determining nCRT response. Public databases were interrogated to identify sEV protein-associated genes that are correlated with the response to nCRT in LARC. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were enrolled. Among them, 8 patients achieved a pathological complete response (good responders, GR), while the remaining 8 did not achieve a complete response (poor responders, PR). Our analysis of pretreatment plasma-derived sEVs revealed 67 significantly up-regulated DEPs and 9 significantly down-regulated DEPs. Notably, PROC (AUC: 0.922), F7 (AUC: 0.953) and AZU1 (AUC: 0.906) demonstrated high AUC values and significant differences (P value < 0.05) in discriminating between GR and PR patients. Furthermore, a signature consisting of 5 sEV protein-associated genes (S100A6, ENO1, MIF, PRDX6 and MYL6) was capable of predicting the response to nCRT, yielding an AUC of 0.621(95% CI: 0.454-0.788). Besides, this 5-sEV protein-associated gene signature enabled stratification of patients into low- and high-risk group, with the low-risk group demonstrating a longer overall survival in the testing set (P = 0.048). Moreover, our investigation identified 11 significantly up-regulated DEPs and 31 significantly down-regulated DEPs when comparing pre- and post-nCRT proteomic profiles. GO analysis unveiled enrichment in the regulation of phospholipase A2 activity. CONCLUSIONS: Differential expression of sEV proteins distinguishes between GR and PR patients and holds promise as predictive markers for nCRT response and prognosis in patients with LARC. Furthermore, our findings highlight substantial alterations in sEV protein composition following nCRT.

Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Trimodality Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study.

The optimal management of patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma is unclear. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy (trimodality therapy) is supported as a standard of care, but definitive chemoradiotherapy is frequently given in practice to patients who may have been surgical candidates. This multi-institutional retrospective cohort study compared the outcomes of consecutive patients diagnosed with stage II to IVA esophageal adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2018 who planned to undergo trimodality therapy or definitive chemoradiotherapy. A total of 493 patients were included, of whom 435 intended to undergo trimodality therapy and 56 intended to undergo definitive chemoradiotherapy. After a median follow-up of 7.3 years, trimodality therapy was associated with a lower risk of locoregional failure (5-year risk, 30.5% vs. 61.3%; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.24-0.62; p<0.001) but not distant metastases (5-year risk, 58.2% vs. 53.9%; HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.77-1.91; p=0.40). There were no differences in overall survival (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.56-1.09; p=0.14) or cancer-specific survival (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.57-1.21; p=0.33). Findings were consistent on propensity score-matched sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, trimodality therapy was associated with a lower risk of locoregional failure, but this did not translate into a significantly lower risk of distant failure or improved survival. Further studies are required to accurately estimate the trade-offs between the two treatment strategies.

Significance of MRI-based radiomics in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer: A narrative review.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancers owing to its ability to downstage primary tumours. Some patients can achieve pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy, and can adopt a "watch and wait" treatment strategy to avoid overtreatment. Therefore, it is essential to develop strategies for predicting responses to neoadjuvant therapy. Radiomics has shown great potential in extracting tumour features from high-throughput medical images for the construction of mathematics models for predicting the effects of anticancerous therapies. Herein, we explored MRI-based radiomics and found that it can predict responses of locally advanced rectal cancers to chemoradiation. Efficient radiomics model allow early-stage prediction of the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced rectal cancers. It helps clinicians to make informed therapeutic decisions. In this review, we discuss the workflow of radiomics, and summarize the clinical application of MRI-based radiomics in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Hsa-miR-483-5p/mRNA network that regulates chemotherapy resistance in locally advanced rectal cancer identified through plasma exosome transcriptomics.

BACKGROUND: Chemoresistance is the primary contributor to distant metastasis in the context of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for rectal cancer. However, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. AIM: To detect the differential expression profiles of plasma exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) in poor and good responders and explore the potential mechanisms of chemoresistance. METHODS: In this study, the profiles of plasma exosomal miRNAs were compared in two dimensions according to treatment responses (poor/good responders) and treatment courses (pre/post-nCRT) using RNA sequencing. RESULTS: Exosome hsa-miR-483-5p was up-regulated in good responders post-nCRT. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that the target genes of hsa-miR-483-5p were mainly enriched in tumor-specific pathways, such as the MAPK signaling pathway, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, Toll-like receptor signaling pathway, VEGF signaling pathway, and mTOR signaling pathway. Further analysis indicated that MAPK3, RAX2, and RNF165 were associated with inferior recurrence-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, and the profiles of MAPK3, TSPYL5, and ZNF417 were correlated with tumor stage. In addition, the expression profiles of MAPK3, RNF165, and ZNF417 were negatively correlated with inhibitory concentration 50 values. Accordingly, an hsa-miR-483-5p/MAPK3/RNF 165/ZNF417 network was constructed. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into the mechanism of chemoresistance in terms of exosomal miRNAs. However, further research is required within the framework of our established miRNA-mRNA network.

Multi-parametric MRI radiomics for predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the application value of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics in predicting the response of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(nCRT), aiming to provide non-invasive biomarkers for clinical decision-making in personalized treatment. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data and imaging records of patients with LARC who received nCRT and total mesorectal excision (TME) in two medical centers from 2017 to 2023. The patients were divided into a training group and a test group in a 7:3 ratio. Through radiomics analysis, radiomics features of tumor volume and mesorectal fat at baseline, before and after neoadjuvant therapy were extracted. Radiomics models based on single sequences (T2WI, DWI) and multi-sequence fusion were constructed, and the logistic regression classifier model was used to evaluate the prediction performance. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included, with 30 in the good response group and 52 in the poor response group. Through the selection of radiomics features, radiomics models based on baseline MRI of tumor volume, mesorectal fat, and differences before and after treatment (Delta) were constructed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the multi-parametric radiomics fusion model in the training and test groups was 0.852 and 0.848, respectively, showing high prediction performance and good calibration. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the multi-parametric MRI radiomics model can effectively predict the response of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Especially, the fusion model provides high accuracy and good calibration. This result is conducive to the formulation of personalized treatment plans and optimization of treatment strategies.

Evolution of genome and immunogenome in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas driven by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by surgery is a standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs). However, the evolution of genome and immunogenome in ESCCs driven by NCRT remains incompletely elucidated. We performed whole-exome sequencing of 51 ESCC tumors collected before and after NCRT, 36 of which were subjected to transcriptome sequencing. Clonal analysis identified clonal extinction in 13 ESCC patients wherein all pre-NCRT clones disappeared after NCRT, and clonal persistence in 9 patients wherein clones endured following NCRT. The clone-persistent patients showed higher pre-NCRT genomic intratumoral heterogeneity and worse prognosis than the clone-extinct ones. In contrast to the clone-extinct patients, the clone-persistent patients demonstrated a high proportion of subclonal neoantigens within pre-treatment specimens. Transcriptome analysis revealed increased immune infiltrations and up-regulated immune-related pathways after NCRT, especially in the clone-extinct patients. The number of T cell receptor-neoantigen interactions was higher in the clone-extinct patients than in the clone-persistent ones. The decrease in T cell repertoire evenness positively correlated to the decreased number of clonal neoantigens after NCRT, especially in the clone-extinct patients. In conclusion, we identified two prognosis-related clonal dynamic modes driven by NCRT in ESCCs. This study extended our knowledge of the ESCC genome and immunogenome evolutions driven by NCRT.

Deep learning model based on endoscopic images predicting treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been the standard practice for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, the treatment response varies greatly among individuals, how to select the optimal candidates for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is crucial. This study aimed to develop an endoscopic image-based deep learning model for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: In this multicenter observational study, pre-treatment endoscopic images of patients from two Chinese medical centers were retrospectively obtained and a deep learning-based tumor regression model was constructed. Treatment response was evaluated based on the tumor regression grade and was defined as good response and non-good response. The prediction performance of the deep learning model was evaluated in the internal and external test sets. The main outcome was the accuracy of the treatment prediction model, measured by the AUC and accuracy. RESULTS: This deep learning model achieved favorable prediction performance. In the internal test set, the AUC and accuracy were 0.867 (95% CI: 0.847-0.941) and 0.836 (95% CI: 0.818-0.896), respectively. The prediction performance was fully validated in the external test set, and the model had an AUC of 0.758 (95% CI: 0.724-0.834) and an accuracy of 0.807 (95% CI: 0.774-0.843). CONCLUSION: The deep learning model based on endoscopic images demonstrated exceptional predictive power for neoadjuvant treatment response, highlighting its potential for guiding personalized therapy.

Clinical Outcomes in T4 and/or N2 Rectal Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: A Retrospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) did not show survival benefit over the standard long course chemoradiotherapy. Trials of TNT did not address the impact of each risk feature in isolation from other high-risk features. METHODOLOGY: In this retrospective study, we describe the clinical outcomes of patients with T4 and/or N2 rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated with chemoradiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). After obtaining the local regulatory approvals, demographic and clinical data were collected for patients in Manitoba between January 2007 and December 2019. RESULTS: The cohort included 331 patients. 61 patients had T4-only disease and 218 had N2-only disease. Mean age was 59.65 years. 74.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), but only 56.5% completed the planned course. R0 resection was achieved in 93.4% of patients (78.7% and 97.2% in T4 and N2, respectively). Median follow up was 4.93 years. 3-year overall recurrence rate was 29%. 3-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate was 8% (16% and 6% in T4 and N2, respectively). 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 84% in the whole cohort (72.6% and 87.1% in T4 and N2, respectively). Incomplete surgical resection was a poor prognostic factor for both OS and LRR. ACT was associated with a survival benefit in the whole cohort (P = .001) and in the N2 sub-cohort (P = 003) but there was no survival benefit observed in T4 sub-cohort. ACT did not have an impact on LRR. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving R0 resection in LARC with neoadjuvant therapy improves recurrence and survival rates. T4 disease carries a worse clinical outcome than N2 and consideration should be given to upstage T4 to stage III. Different high-risk features in LARC predict different clinical outcomes. In the era of TNT, personalization of treatment strategy based on these factors could potentially improve outcomes.