Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Plant Sci ; 15: 1321900, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38375082

RESUMEN

Controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer (CRNF) has been expected to save labor input, reduce environmental pollution, and increase yield in crop production. However, the economic feasibility is still controversial due to its high cost. To clarify the suitable application strategy of CRNF in promoting the yield, nitrogen use efficiency and income on wheat grown in paddy soil, four equal N patterns were designed in 2017-2021 with polymer-coated urea (PCU) and common urea as material, including PCU applied once pre-sowing (M1), PCU applied 60% at pre-sowing and 40% at re-greening (M2), 30% PCU and 30% urea applied at pre-sowing, 20% PCU and 20% urea applied at re-greening (M3), and urea applied at four stage (CK, Basal:tillering:jointing:booting=50%:10%:20%:20%). In addition, M4-M6, which reduced N by 10%, 20% and 30% respectively based on M3, were designed in 2019-2021 to explore their potential for N-saving and efficiency-improving. The results showed that, compared with CK, M1 did not significantly reduce yield, but decreased the average N recovery efficiency (NRE) and benefits by 1.63% and 357.71 CNY ha-1 in the four years, respectively. M2 and M3 promoted tiller-earing, delayed the decrease of leaf area index (LAI) at milk-ripening stage, and increased dry matter accumulation post-anthesis, thereby jointly increasing spike number and grain weight of wheat, which significantly increased yield and NRE compared with CK in 2017-2021. Due to the savings in N fertilizer costs, M3 achieved the highest economic benefits. With the 20% N reduction, M5 increased NRE by 16.95% on average while decreasing yield and net benefit by only 6.39% and 7.40% respectively, compared with M3. Although NRE could continue to increase, but the yield and benefits rapidly decreased after N reduction exceeds 20%. These results demonstrate that twice-split application of PCU combined with urea is conducive to achieving a joint increase in yield, NRE, and benefits. More importantly, it can also significantly improve the NRE without losing yield and benefits while saving 20% N input.

2.
J Environ Manage ; 246: 283-288, 2019 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31181477

RESUMEN

The article focuses on the environmental and economic assessment of animal/poultry manure utilisation technologies as the sources of the greatest negative impact on environment from agriculture. This procedure is especially topical in the context of current transition to BAT system in Russia. Russian BAT reference books on intensive rearing of pigs and intensive rearing of poultry came into force on June 1, 2018. At present, the large-scale livestock farms face the difficult task of selecting efficient technologies for manure utilisation with due account for their performance potential and the opportunities for end products use. To address the relevant practical issues, the criteria for the environmental and economic assessment of technologies were developed for selecting the rational technological solutions adjusted to the conditions of particular agricultural enterprises. Environmental assessment was based on the nitrogen saving coefficient. The developed approaches were applied to a dairy farm for 2600 head, a poultry factory for 1 million head and a full-cycle pig rearing complex for 16,500 head. The best suited technologies of animal/poultry manure utilisation were substantiated for these enterprises, which would allow achieving the reduction in environmental pollution by nutrients at the economically justified costs.


Asunto(s)
Ganado , Estiércol , Animales , Granjas , Aves de Corral , Federación de Rusia , Porcinos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA